Repair of giant incisional abdominal wall hernias using open intraperitoneal mesh

Background Very large and complex incisional hernias, especially those involving loss of abdominal wall, present a particular challenge to the surgeon. Aims The open intraperitoneal technique was used prospectively for the repair of incisional hernias in a selected group of patients with large defects, often those with major loss of abdominal wall, overweight patients, and previous failures of incisional repair. Materials and methods Between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2005, out of 275 patients operated on for incisional hernia repair, 61 of them, most of whom were obese with multiorificial recurrent or giant hernias and contraindicated for laparoscopy, were treated using an open intraperitoneal mesh technique. There were 50 females and 11 males, with a mean age of 61. The median ASA score of the group was 2.3, with a mean BMI of 34 kg/m² and a mean hernia surface of 182 cm². Sixty-four percent of the patients had undergone one or more previous incisional hernia repairs. Results Mean operating time was 130 min, with an average hospital stay of 13 days. None of the patients died. Postoperative complications occurred in 21% of the patients; most of which were minor, but two cases (3.3%) developed deep abscesses requiring surgery and removal of the mesh. A recurrence rate of 5% was found after a mean follow-up of 35 months (8–88). Conclusion Open intraperitoneal mesh repair appears to be a good option for the treatment of complex incisional hernia (at least 10 cm in diameter or multiorificial) in obese patients contraindicated for laparoscopy.     

Incisional hernia treatment with progressive pneumoperitoneum and retromuscular prosthetic hernioplasty

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Major incisional hernias of the abdominal wall often pose a serious surgical problem. The choice between simple suture repair and mesh repair remains uncertain. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients underwent surgery to repair large abdominal incisional hernias, i.e., with parietal defects of 10 cm or more, by retromuscular prosthetic hernioplasty between 1996 and 1999. All patients were treated preoperatively by progressive pneumoperitoneum and were followed up for 2-5 years (mean 38.3 months). RESULTS: Almost all patients tolerated the pneumoperitoneum; no postoperative death occurred. Six patients developed a subcutaneous infection but none of them required removal of the mesh. Two patients (2.6%) had recurrent incisional hernia. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that pneumoperitoneum is useful in preparing patients for incisional hernioplasty. Retromuscular mesh repair represents an appropriate surgical procedure, particularly in view of its low rate of recurrence.     

Review of technique for combined closed incisional hernia repair and panniculectomy status post-open bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: After open bariatric surgery, many patients develop incisional hernia. Patients who were once morbidly obese provide a unique challenge to hernia repair, given the larger nature of their fascial defects and the concomitant problem of extreme amounts of abdominal wall laxity. We reviewed a technique for surgical repair of incisional hernias combined with panniculectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients status post-open bariatric surgery who underwent incisional hernia repair with overlay mesh and combined panniculectomy between 2000 and 2003. RESULTS: Hernia repair and panniculectomy were performed 18 months after open bariatric surgery. The patients had an average weight loss of 58.6 kg. Mean follow-up after hernia repair and panniculectomy was 18 months. Patients underwent prefascial hernia repair with plication of the fascial edges followed by midline anchoring of overlay mesh. The averave amount of excess tissue excised via panniculectomy was 3,001 g. The average hospital stay was 4 days. Minor wound problems (eg, suture abscess, seroma) occurred in 20 patients. Seromas were treated with serial aspiration in the office. There were no intra-abdominal complications or recurrences of the incisional hernias. CONCLUSION: Closed hernia repair with prefascial plication and overlay mesh is a safe, effective alternative to traditional incisional hernia repair. It provides adequate hernia repair without recurrence and eliminates intra-abdominal complications. It is our belief that combining the hernia repair and panniculectomy minimizes the risk of hernia recurrence through alleviation of stress on the repair by removing excess abdominal wall tissue.     

Nuttall technique: A method for subumbilical incisional hernia repair revised

Background Large ventral incisional hernias are frequently repaired either by open or by laparoscopic mesh technique. The technique recommended by Nuttall has been used for the repair of large subumbilical incisional hernias but has not been popularized. Materials and methods From 1991 to 2005, 21 patients, mean age 64.6 ± 13 (44–86) years, underwent repair of large subumbilical incisional hernia with the Nuttall technique by which the rectus muscles are detached from the symphysis pubis and transposed to the opposite side. The exerted tension is minimal to the underlying tissues, and no prosthetic material is required to reinforce the abdominal wall. Results Morbidity was recorded in five patients (23.8%). The median follow-up time was 84 months, and the recurrence rate was 4.8% (one patient). Conclusions Although a small number of patients have undergone repair with the Nuttall technique, the long-term results of the method seem to be encouraging for the repair of large subumbulical incisional hernias.     

Surgical treatment of large incisional hernias by an intraperitoneal Dacron mesh and an aponeurotic graft

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic problems of giant incisional hernias of the abdominal wall are difficult to resolve. The technique of repair must make up for the loss of abdominal wall substance and reestablish the interplay of the abdominal musculature. The use of prosthetic materials complies with these two imperatives. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of postoperative incisional hernias by intraperitoneal insertion of Dacron (DuPont) mesh and an aponeurotic graft. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively studied 350 consecutive patients who were operated on for giant postoperative incisional hernia. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was 0.6%. Seven patients (2%) developed subcutaneous infections that did not affect the prostheses. Another seven patients (2%) developed deep-seated infections that necessitated removal of the mesh in five cases. Eleven patients (3.1%) had recurrence of incisional hernia. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study shows that the intraperitoneal positioning of Dacron mesh and an aponeurotic graft can efficiently treat giant abdominal wall hernias.     

Outcomes of the open mesh repair of large incisional hernias using an intraperitoneal composite mesh: our experience with 100 cases

Incisional hernia repair sometimes requires intraperitoneal implantation of a mesh. This becomes necessary when the hernia opening is large, in particular, in patients with a low abdominal wall surface/wall defect surface (AWS/WDS) ratio, in large boundary incisional hernias where the proximity to bone structures or cartilage often complicates retromuscular mesh implantation and in multi-recurrent incisional hernias that are sometimes characterised by an actual loss of abdominal wall tissue. The authors report on the results of a series of 100 incisional hernias treated between 1999 and 2006 using the open technique to implant an intraperitoneal mesh (Parietex Composite). Mean follow-up time was 42 months (range 12–96 months). The mean wall defect surface was 95 cm² (range 60–210 cm²). Twelve percent of patients suffered minor complications: 5 seromas (5%), 3 haematomas (3%) and 4 parietal suppurations (4%). No mesh had to be removed. The recurrence rate was 6%. At 6 months after surgery, no patient lamented pain or discomfort due to foreign body sensation. None of these patients presented intestinal occlusion or enterocutaneous fistulae. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the mesh should be implanted in direct contact with the viscera only where absolutely necessary, i.e., when it cannot be implanted in the retromuscular area without creating excessive parietal tension. Our experience with PC mesh, over the short-to-medium term, was positive. Naturally, further studies are required to evaluate long-term biocompatibility.     

Surgical treatment of postoperative incisional hernias by intraperitoneal insertion of dacron mesh and an aponeurotic graft: a report on 250 cases.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic problems of giant incisional hernias of the abdominal wall are often difficult to resolve. The technique of repair must make up for the loss of abdominal wall substance and reestablish the interplay of the abdominal musculature. The use of prosthetic materials complies with these 2 imperatives. HYPOTHESIS: The results of surgical treatment of postoperative incisional hernias by intraperitoneal insertion of Dacron mesh and an aponeurotic graft were evaluated. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study of 250 patients in a university hospital. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was 0.8%. Five patients (2%) developed a subcutaneous infection that did not affect the prosthesis. Another 5 patients (2%) developed a deep-seated infection that necessitated removal of the mesh in 3 cases. Eight patients (3.2%) had recurrence of incisional hernia. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study shows that giant abdominal wall hernias can be efficiently treated by the intraperitoneal positioning of Dacron mesh and an aponeurotic graft.     

Long-term results of 186 patients with large incisional abdominal wall hernia treated by intraperitoneal mesh

Massive incisional abdominal wall hernias are frequent and difficult to repair, especially when they are large, multiply recurrent and when associated high with risk factors. We report the long-term results of 192 hernia repairs (in 186 patients) by non-resorbable mesh placed intraperitoneally and fixed by fascia stapler. We describe the details of the technique. There were no deaths. Early and late wound infections occurred in 11.7%, late occlusions in 6.3% and recurrence in 16%. Four percent of patients required removal of the mesh. The main caracteristic of this study was the long follow-up period (mean duration = 77 months). In view of the good results (70%), simplicity and quite execution of this technique, intraperitoneal mesh placement should be considered in the repair of large hernias when a prothesis is required.     

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: an initial institutional experience

BACKGROUND: Ventral and incisional hernias remain a problem for surgeons with reported recurrence rates of 25-50% for open repairs. Laparoscopic approaches offer several theoretical advantages over open repairs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing a laparoscopic ventral hernia repair from April to December 2000 were prospectively entered in a database. Patients underwent repair with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene dual mesh. Full-thickness abdominal wall nonabsorbable sutures and 5-mm tacks were placed circumferentially. RESULTS: Of 32 patients, 15 underwent incisional repair, 13 had repair of a recurrent incisional hernia, and 4 had repair of a primary abdominal wall defect. Two procedures [2/32; 6.3%] were converted to open, one for loss of abdominal domain and one for neovascularization due to cirrhosis. There were two early recurrences [2/30; 6.7%]. Both of these failures occurred in patients with hernia defects extending to the inguinal ligament, preventing placement of full-thickness abdominal wall sutures inferiorly. Average operating time was 128 +/- 42 min (range 37-225 min). Average length of stay was 1.8 days [range 0-7 days]. There were no transfusion requirements or wound infections. One patient underwent a small bowel resection after completion of repair. One patient required drainage of a seroma 4 weeks after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair can be safely performed with an acceptable early recurrence rate, operative time, length of stay, and morbidity. Securing the mesh with full-thickness abdominal wall sutures in at least four quadrants remains a key factor in preventing early recurrence.     

The feasibility of adopting laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in general surgery practice: early outcomes in an unselected series of patients

A laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia repair has been shown to be safe and effective in selected patients. We report our early outcomes following laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair (LVHR) in an unselected series of patients encountered in general surgery practice. All patients referred with incisional hernia were offered a laparoscopic repair using prosthetic mesh. Patients were not excluded from laparoscopic approach on the basis of age, previous surgery, defect size, intraperitoneal mesh, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, or abdominal wall stomas. We followed 28 consecutive patients who underwent LVHR (17 primary, 11 recurrent hernias). Laparoscopic repair was completed in 27 patients with a mean operative time of 141.6 +/- 11.9 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. The mean size of the abdominal wall defects was 153.4 +/- 27.5 cm and the mean mesh size was 349.2 +/- 59.1 cm. The mean hospital stay was 3.7 +/- 0.3 days. Nine patients developed large wound seromas; all spontaneously resolved. Our experience suggests that LVHR is feasible as a primary approach to most incisional hernias encountered in general surgery practice.     

Ventral Hernia Repair in Bariatric Surgery

Background: Obesity is an important risk factor for perioperative complications including the development of ventral hernias. Methods: This retrospective study comprises patients who underwent abdominal hernia repair simultaneously with or following implantation of a Swedish Adjustable Gastric Band? (SAGB). Results: 9 out of 415 patients (2.2%) who received a SAGB between January 1996 and June 2001 underwent ventral hernia repair. In 6 patients, hernias preexisted from previous abdominal surgery at the time of the bariatric procedure, and another 3 hernias occurred at the median and left upper abdominal trocar position following SAGB placement. Median BMI at time of SAGB implantation was 44 (range 35-52), and at time of hernia repair was 36 (range 25-46). 2 hernias were repaired during SAGB placement, 3 during redo surgery, and 2 during abdominoplasty. In 2 patients, significant weight loss with loss of soft tissue support of the hernia sac led to recurrent episodes of small bowel obstruction necessitating emergency repair. Repair included direct defect closure in 7 patients and sublay polypropylene net implantation in 2 patients. Recoveries have been uneventful without wound infections or recurrence in all patients after a median follow-up of 34 months (range 13-69). Conclusion: In morbidly obese patients, the optimal management and timing of incisional hernia repair should weigh the risk of recurrence and perioperative complications against the risk of hernia-associated complications.     

The use of an underlay polypropylene mesh in complicated incisional hernias: sucessful French surgical technique

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia repair with conventional techniques is associated with high recurrence rates of 30-50%. Surgical repair using different prosthetic biomaterials is becoming increasingly popular. On the basis of the favourable results by French surgeons, the results of underlay prosthetic mesh repair using polypropylene mesh in complicated and recurrent incisional hernias have been studied. METHODS: After preparation and excision of the entire hernia sac, the peritoneum and posterior rectus sheath are closed with a continuous looped polyglyconate suture. The prosthesis used for the midline hernias is positioned on the posterior rectus sheath and extends far beyond the borders of the myoaponeurotic defect. The prosthesis for lumbar and subcostal hernias is placed in a prepared space between the transverse and oblique muscles. Intraperitoneal placement of the mesh must be avoided. Between January 1997 and September 1998 a total of 57 incisional hernia repair (25 primary hernias, 32 recurrent hernias) have been performed using this technique (28 women, 29 men, mean age 56+/-13 years). RESULTS: Local complications occurred in 6 patients (11%). One patient suddenly died on the 3rd postoperative day from severe pulmonary embolism (mortality 1,7%). Thirthy-seven patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were reexamined clinically (follow up time 6-33 months). Till now one recurrent hernia has been observed. There were only minor complaints like a feeling of tension in the abdominal wall (n = 3) and slight pain under physical stress (n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: The aforementioned technique of underlay prosthetic repair allows an anatomical and consolidated reconstruction of the damaged abdominal wall with excellent results and low complication rates especially in high risk patients and complicated hernias.     

Reconstruction of the abdominal wall for incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall reconstruction with mobilization of autologous tissue has evolved as a reliable option for patients with incisional hernias. METHODS: With the aim of evaluating morbidity and recurrence rates in patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction for incisional hernia repair, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 188 patients treated between 1996 and 2003. RESULTS: Primary approximation of the fascial defect was achieved in 77% and was reinforced by either mesh placement or rectus muscle advancement. The remaining 23% were reconstructed either by mesh placement, components separation, or distant flap mobilization. Median follow-up was 15 months. Overall morbidity rate was 38%; recurrence rate was 13%. Dimensions of the hernia and intraoperative enterotomies were associated with postoperative complications. Lack of complete restoration of the myofascial abdominal wall continuity was associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with incisional hernias, techniques involving autologous tissue mobilization are safe and associated with low recurrence rates.     

Incisional hernia—comparison of mesh repair with Cardiff repair: an university hospital experience

Background: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. Various types of repair are recommended for incisional hernia. Suture and mesh repair are compared in the present study. Method: One hundred seventy one patients with incisional hernia underwent Cardiff repair (far and near sutures with reinforcement sutures) which was used as an open suture repair while onlay polypropylene mesh was used in the mesh repair technique. Result: Cardiff repair was performed in 116 patients with no mortality with recurrence in two patients with mean follow up of 7.1 years. Both these patients with recurrence had a defect measuring more than 10 cm in width. Mesh repair was carried out in 55 patients with no recurrence in mean follow up of 37 months. Seroma formation was noted in 7 (12.72%) with mesh repair as compared to 4 (3.44%) patients with Cardiff repair. Conclusion: We recommend Cardiff repair for primary and small to medium size incisional hernias. Onlay polypropylene mesh is ideal for tension-free hernia repair, recurrent incisional hernia and hernia defects wider than 10 cm.     

Repair of large complex recurrent incisional hernias with retromuscular mesh and panniculectomy

BACKGROUND: Recurrent incisional hernia repair is associated with high recurrence and wound complication rates. METHODS: The clinical courses of patients who underwent recurrent incisional hernia repair via retromuscular mesh placement with concomitant panniculectomy at a university teaching hospital from 1999 to 2004 were reviewed retrospectively. Postoperative evaluation included a quality of life survey. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (13 male, 34 female) with an average body mass index of 34.4 kg/m2, an average midline hernia defect of 31.4 cm, and at least 1 and on average 2.5 previous repair attempts underwent hernia repair. Wound infections occurred in 4 patients (8%) and seromas requiring aspiration occurred in 1 patient (2%). Four patients (8%) had re-recurrences of their hernias. All patients rated the postoperative appearance of their abdomen as at least satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent incisional hernia repair with a retromuscular mesh and panniculectomy has low recurrence and wound complication rates and excellent patient satisfaction.     

Pregnancy and ventral hernia repair

Summary Reluctance to repair anterior abdominal wall hernias in women of childbearing age is probably unjustified. A unique series is described of 27 women who gave birth to 41 full-term babies following repair of an anterior abdominal wall hernia with no recurrence of the hernia. Nineteen had primary and recurrent umbilical hernias and an incisional hernia in a low transverse incision repaired by the onlay darn technique and have produced 29 babies. Eight had umbilical hernias, gross diastasis of the recti and post-cesarean section vertical incisional hernias repaired by the Shoelace technique followed by 12 full-term pregnancies. Little is written about the fate of the abdominal wall subjected to pregnancies following repair of ventral hernias, since the majority of women having these hernias repaired are past the child-bearing age or are warned off further pregnancies by their doctors or undergo tubal ligation with the hernia repair. The Shoelace repair is described, stressing its advantages over mesh hernioplasties in women who wish to have further pregnancies. There is apparently no reason to refuse to repair these hernias. There are even positive indications in view of serious complications associated with pregnancy in the presence of an anterior wall hernia. Prosthetic mesh tends to contract and harden and may seriously interfere with abdominal expansion in pregnancies so these hernias are probably best repaired by the Shoelace technique.     

Laparoscopic ePTFE mesh repair of incisional and ventral hernias

Incisional hernia is a relatively frequent complication of abdominal surgery. The use of mesh to repair incisional and ventral hernias results in lower recurrence rates compared with primary suture techniques. The laparoscopic approach may be associated with lower postoperative morbidity compared with open procedures. Long-term recurrence rates after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernias are not well defined. A prospective study of the initial experience of a standardized technique of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair carried out in a tertiary referral hospital was undertaken between January 2003 and February 2007. Laparoscopic hernia repair was attempted in 71 patients and was successful in 68 (conversion rate 4%). The mean age of the patients identified was 63.1 years (39 men and 31 women). Multiple hernial defects were identified in 38 patients (56%), and the mean overall size of the fascial defects was 166 cm(2). The mean mesh size used was 403 cm(2). The mean operative time was 121 minutes. There were six (9%) major complications in this series, but there were no deaths. Hernia recurrence was noted in four patients (6%) at a mean follow up of 20 months. Our preliminary experience indicates that laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair is technically feasible and has acceptable postoperative morbidity and low early recurrence rates.     

老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发的危险因素探讨及风险列线图模型的建立

目的探讨老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发的危险因素，并建立预测老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发的风险列线图模型。 方法选取2014年1月至2019年12月于南京大学附属鼓楼医院进行诊治的260例行腹壁切口疝修补术老年患者作为研究对象，分析所选患者的临床资料，根据是否复发将所选患者分为复发组和正常组，采用Logistic回归分析筛选老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发的危险因素，并建立老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发的风险列线图模型。 结果260例腹壁切口疝修补术老年患者中术后复发患者36例（13.85%）。单因素分析结果显示，复发组和正常组患者性别、年龄、疝类型、疝部位、补片型号、固定补片、手术类型及饮酒史等资料差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05），而手术时间、医师水平、术后血肿、吸烟史及肥胖等资料差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。Logistic回归分析结果显示，手术时间≥120 min、医师水平、术后血肿、有吸烟史及肥胖等为老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素（P<0.05），均和老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发高度相关。基于手术时间、医师水平、术后血肿、吸烟史及肥胖等老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素，建立预测老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发的风险列线图模型，C-index指数为0.775（95% CI：0.728~0.823），预测值与实测值基本一致，说明本列线图的辨别力较好，列线图模型预测老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发的受试者工作特征曲线显示，曲线下面积为0.807，表明本研究列线图的预测价值较高。 结论手术时间≥120 min、医师水平、术后血肿、有吸烟史及肥胖等为老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素，本研究所建立的列线图有助于预测老年患者腹壁切口疝修补术后复发的发生风险。     

Combined Laparoscopic and Open Technique for the Repair of Large Complicated Incisional Hernias

Background

During laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, conversion to open surgery is sometimes needed, especially in cases of large complicated incisional hernias. No guidelines exist for determining when conversions should be considered. This study aimed to investigate the safety of a combined technique as an alternative to conversion in the laparoscopic repair of large complicated incisional hernias and to evaluate the impact of early conversion to the combined technique on patient outcome.

Methods

Beginning in November 2008, early conversion was initiated for patients with large complicated incisional hernia when dense extensive intraabdominal adhesions were present. Two cohorts of patients with large complicated incisional hernia were retrospectively analyzed: 21 patients before the initiation of early conversion (group 2) and 21 patients after its inception (group 1). The data analyzed included patient demographics, operative parameters, complications, and recurrence.

Results

No significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to age, gender, body mass index, coexisting conditions, number of previous laparotomies, number of previous repairs, or features of the hernia. Groups 1 and 2 differed significantly in terms of mean operative time (110.7 vs 138.8 min), enterotomy rate (0 vs 29 %), and postoperative hospital stay (4.7 vs 6.1 days). In group 1, early conversion to the combined technique was necessary for 16 patients (76 %), and no delayed conversion occurred. In group 2, delayed conversion to the combined technique was necessary for 11 patients (52 %), and no early conversion occurred. During the follow-up period, neither wound/mesh infection nor trocar-site hernia occurred.

Conclusion

The combined technique proved to be a safe and minimally invasive alternative to conversion in laparoscopic repair of large complicated incisional hernias. Early conversion to the combined technique was associated with less technical difficulty, deceased operative time, lower enterotomy rate, and shorter postoperative hospital stay.     

Long-Term Outcome of 254 Complex Incisional Hernia Repairs Using the Modified Rives-Stoppa Technique

Background Repair of complex incisional hernias poses a major challenge. Aim The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of the modified Rives-Stoppa repair of complex incisional hernias using a synthetic prosthesis. Methods We reviewed patients undergoing a modified Rives-Stoppa repair of complex incisional hernias from 1990 to 2003. Patients were followed through clinic visits and mailed questionnaires. Follow-up data were complete in all patients (mean 70 months, range 24–177 months), and 87% of patients completed a mailed questionnaire. Primary outcome included mortality, morbidity, and hernia recurrence. Secondary outcome measures were duration of hospital stay, long-term abdominal wall pain, and self-reported patient satisfaction. Results Altogether, 254 patients underwent a modified Rives-Stoppa repair. Among them, 60% had a significant co-morbidity, and 30% had one or more previously failed hernia repairs. Mortality was zero, and overall morbidity was 13% (wound infection 4%, prosthetic infection 3%, seroma/hematoma 4%). The overall hernia recurrence rate was 5%, including explantation of mesh because of infection. Wound/prosthetic infection was predictive for hernia recurrence (31% vs. 4%, p = 0.003). Among the respondents, 89% reported overall satisfaction with their repair. Conclusion The Rives-Stoppa repair of complex incisional hernias using synthetic prosthetic materials is safe with a low recurrence rate (5%) and high patient satisfaction. Postoperative wound infection is a risk factor for hernia recurrence. This work was presented in part at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract during Digestive Disease Week, Los Angeles, CA, May 2006. The abstract was published in Gastroenterology 2006;130:A891.