Paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination in a biweekly schedule in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer: a phase i study

Purpose: This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the paclitaxel–gemcitabine combination in a biweekly schedule in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Treatment was administered on an outpatient basis every 2 weeks: paclitaxel over a 1-h IV infusion and gemcitabine as a 30-min IV infusion immediately following paclitaxel. Results: Twenty-nine patients were treated at six different dose levels, ranging from paclitaxel 135–175 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1,500–3,000 mg/m². A total of 198 cycles were administered (median 7, range 1–13). DLTs in the first two cycles were grade 4 neutropenia and myocardial ischemia at the dose level paclitaxel/gemcitabine 150/2,000 mg/m², febrile neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia at the dose level paclitaxel/gemcitabine 175/2,500 mg/m², fatal pneumonitis, sudden death and grade 3 neutropenia at the dose level paclitaxel/gemcitabine 175/3,000 mg/m². The MTD was paclitaxel 175 mg/m² and gemcitabine 2,500 mg/m². The average dose intensity at this dose level was 98%. The overall intent-to-treat response rate was 35.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.97% - 53.47%). Overall median survival was 36 weeks (95% CI, 24-48). Conclusion: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine can be safely administered at a high dose intensity on an every-other-week schedule. The recommended phase II dose is paclitaxel 175 mg/m² and gemcitabine 2,500 mg/m².     

Phase I trial of gemcitabine,administered as a standard and constant dose-rate infusion,in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors (LOA-2)

The major purposes of this study were to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), toxicity profile, and antitumor activity of gemcitabine and paclitaxel combination therapy when administered to patients with advanced solid tumors, using two infusion schedules of each agent. Paclitaxel was administered on day 1, followed by gemcitabine, and gemcitabine alone was administered on day 8, of each 21-day treatment course. In the initial phase of the trial, paclitaxel was administered during 3 hours and gemcitabine during 30 minutes (schedule A). After the MTD was determined on this schedule, patients were then treated with paclitaxel during 1 hour and gemcitabine at a fixed dose-rate of 10 mg/m(2)/min (schedule B). Forty-six patients were treated with 176 courses at 7 dose levels. The MTD for schedule A was 1,300 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2) and for schedule B was 1,000 mg/m(2) and 200 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine and paclitaxel, respectively. The DLT for schedule A was neutropenia and for schedule B was neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was relatively mild. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel, using both schedules of administration in the current trial, is a promising chemotherapeutic regimen.     

Clinical phase I study with one-hour paclitaxel infusion

Background: Paclitaxel (PAC) is one of the major anti-cancer drugs,effective in different tumors. Studies with 24-hour infusion with 135mg/m² and a three-hour infusion with 175 mg/m²showed a significant schedule-dependent toxicity. We evaluated a one-hourinfusion schedule within a phase I study to determine the dose limitingtoxicity (DLT), the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and the anti-cancerefficacy.Patients and methods: Patients with advanced malignant tumors weretreated within cohorts by one-hour infusional paclitaxel starting with 150mg/m² and stepwise escalation with 25 mg/m²increments. Therapy was repeated in three-week intervals. Cycles wererepeated until progression. Toxicity was closely monitored, anti-cancerefficacy was only evaluated in those patients who received at minimum twotreatment cycles.Results: Thirty-four patients entered the study (11 NSCLC, five SCLC,seven ovarian cancer, one cervix cancer, nine MBC, one HN cancer). The MTDwas PAC 250 mg/m². The DLT was central and peripheralneuropathy (WHO grade 3). Other significant toxicities were fatigue,myalgia/arthralgia and paraesthesia. No significant myelotoxicity wasobserved. Totally twentyone patients were evaluable for response. A partialresponse was observed in five (24%) patients (two NSCLC, two ovariancancer, one head and neck cancer). Three (14%) patients had stabledisease and in 13 (62%) patients progressive disease was observed.Conclusions: Paclitaxel 225 mg/m² on day 1 administered asone-hour infusion and repeated every three weeks can be given safely, featuredno relevant myelotoxicity, and is the recommended dose for phase II studies.     

Phase I/II study of the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Purpose: We performed a phase I/II study evaluating the combination ofpaclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients withadvanced ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to define a feasible andsafe combination regimen that could be recommended for future phase IIIstudies.Design: This study was a parallel two-arm, non-randomized, open trial. Ina first step, carboplatin was administered at a fixed dose of AUC 5 andpaclitaxel was escalated in 25 mg/m² steps starting at 135mg/m². Paclitaxel was given as a three-hour infusion.Carboplatin was administered on day 1 following paclitaxel in one study armand 24 hours after paclitaxel infusion on day 2 in the other study arm.Carboplatin was escalated to AUC 6 and AUC 7.5 after the MTD for paclitaxelhad been defined. Treatment was repeated every three weeks.Patients: Sixty-one patients with untreated histologically confirmedepithelial ovarian cancer were recruited of whom 59 were found eligible andevaluable for toxicity. Thirty-three patients with bidimensionally measurabledisease were evaluable for tumor response.Results: We could not detect any advantage of the two-day schedule comparedwith the more convenient one-day schedule. Dose limiting toxicities wereneutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and neurotoxicity. Except for two patients,toxicity was acceptable and clinically managable. One patient died ofneutropenic sepsis and one further patient developed grade III peripheralneurotoxicity that did not resolve within two months after chemotherapy hadbeen terminated. Overall objective response rate was 70%. The MTD forpaclitaxel was 185 mg/m² and AUC 6 for carboplatin,respectively. Secondary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not allow further doseescalation and therefore is not generally recommended.Conclusions: Paclitaxel 185 mg/m² given as three-hourinfusion followed by carboplatin AUC 6 is a feasible and safe regimen and canbe recommended for phase III trials. Observed response rates justify furtherevaluation of this combination. A randomized phase III trial comparing athree-hour infusion of paclitaxel 185 mg/m² combined witheither carboplatin AUC 6 or cisplatin 75 mg/m² as first-linechemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer has recently been initiated by ourgroup.     

A phase-I study evaluating the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and paclitaxel as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline

Purpose The two main goals of this phase-I study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to characterize the toxicity of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD; Lipo-Dox) and paclitaxel (PTX) administered on a 3-week schedule in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had previously been treated with anthracycline-based therapy. Methods This phase-I study was performed via a two-staged dose escalation schema. The initial doses were PLD 30 mg/m² and PTX 150 mg/m², administered intravenously once every 21 days. The dose of PLD was escalated in increments of 5 mg/m² until the MTD was reached, at which time the PTX was then increased in increments of 10 mg/m² until the MTD was reached. Results Twenty-three patients received between 1 and 13 treatment cycles. In stage I of the study, 14 patients received a fixed dose of PTX 150 mg/m² while PLD escalated from 30 mg/m². At 40 mg/m², PLD resulted in dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) including febrile neutropenia and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia that occurred in two of five patients. In stage II of the study, nine patients received fixed dose of PLD 35 mg/m² and escalating doses of PTX starting at 160 mg/m². At PTX 170 mg/m² and dose-limiting neutropenic fever occurred in two of five patients. Out of 19 evaluable patients, 10 (52.6%) achieved objective response (one complete response and nine partial response), and 5 had stable disease. Conclusions The maximal tolerated doses of PLD and PTX are 35 and 160 mg/m², respectively, administered every 3 weeks. The combination of PLD (30–35 mg/m²) and PTX (150–160 mg/m²) constitutes an active regimen with mild toxicity that merits further study.     

A phase I study of oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine: correlation of clinical outcome with gene expression

Purpose Oxaliplatin has in vitro activity similar to or higher than other platinum agents. Preclinically, gemcitabine has demonstrated synergy when combined with platinum compounds. These facts formed the rationale for determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin. Methods Eligible patients with advanced incurable solid tumors were given oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² as a 2-h infusion on day 1 followed by escalating doses of gemcitabine given over 30 min on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Results A total of 43 patients were enrolled, including 30 patients at the MTD in an expanded cohort. At a gemcitabine dose of 800 mg/m², 1/6 patients had a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 blurred vision and memory loss). At 1,000 mg/m², 1/6 patients had a DLT (grade 3 increase in AST). At 1,200 mg/m², 2/3 patients had a DLT (grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 confusion). The MTD of gemcitabine with 130 mg/m² of oxaliplatin was therefore 1,000 mg/m². The clearances of gemcitabine and ultrafilterable platinum are within the ranges previously reported for single agents. A patient with colon cancer had a partial response, and 21 patients had a best response of stable disease. In patients with tumor biopsies treated at the MTD, decreased ribonucleotide reductase M2 expression correlated with response. Conclusion Treatment with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin was well tolerated with primarily hematologic toxicity at the MTD. Study of biochemical correlates of response remain of interest althought current results remain exploratory. This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grants U01 CA62505 and P30 CA33572.     

A phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with solid tumors

Purpose: This dose escalation study aimed to determine the recommended doses, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin and gemcitabine given on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. This schedule may maximize dose intensity of both drugs with acceptable or reduced toxicity. Patient and methods: Eligible patients had solid malignancies, no more than two prior courses of chemotherapy, ECOG performance status 0–2, neurotoxicity ≤ NCI-CTC grade 1 and adequate organ function. Dose escalation commenced at oxaliplatin 40 mg/m² and gemcitabine 750 mg/m², both given on days 1 and 8 every 21 days, and reached oxaliplatin 80 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m². The two highest dose levels were each expanded to six patients to gain additional toxicity data. Results: There were no dose limiting toxicities related to treatment and an MTD was not reached. Five patients (24%) had grade 3 neutropenia, without associated infection, and seven patients (33%) had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Neurotoxicity was mild and no worse than grade 1. Two patients with mesothelioma (10%) had partial responses and 11 patients (52%) had disease stabilization. No pharmacokinetic interaction between oxaliplatin and gemcitabine was detected. Dose intensity was maximal at level 4 (oxaliplatin 70 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m²). Conclusions: This schedule allows oxaliplatin and gemcitabine to be delivered at the full dose intensity of each drug with excellent tolerability and predictable pharmacokinetics. The recommended doses for phase II studies are oxaliplatin 70 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 every 21 days.     

Weekly administration of topotecan and paclitaxel in pretreated advanced cancer patients: a phase I/II study

Purpose This study was a phase I/II, cohort, dose-escalation trial of topotecan and paclitaxel. Its aim was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the combination and to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), as a recommended dose for phase II, as well as to get preliminary data on the efficacy (activity) of the drug in pretreated patients with ovarian cancer, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods Included in the study were 52 pretreated patients, 19 with ovarian cancer, 20 with SCLC and 13 with NSCLC. The doses of topotecan were escalated from 1.25 to 2 mg/m² and of paclitaxel from 60 to 80 mg/m². A minimum of four patients were included at each of the six levels of dose escalation.Results We found that DLT due to grade 3 and 4 myelotoxicity was at levels 5 and 6 at doses of 1.75 and 80 mg/m² (level 5) and 2 and 80 mg/m² (level 6) for topotecan and paclitaxel, respectively. The MTD and recommended accepted doses are 1.75 mg/m² for topotecan and 70 mg/m² for paclitaxel. Of the 52 patients, 17 (33%) showed a response: 1 complete response (1.92%) and 16 partial responses (30.77%).Conclusions Topotecan combined with paclitaxel administered once weekly for three consecutive weeks repeated for every 28 days resulted in well-tolerated toxicity at doses of 1.75 and 70 mg/m², respectively, and a response rate of 33% in pretreated cancer patients.     

Fever-range whole-body thermal therapy combined with cisplatin,gemcitabine, and daily interferon-α: A description of a phase I-II protocol

Purpose: The purpose of the Phase I component of this study was to find the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin administered within a regimen of fever-range whole body thermal therapy (FR-WB-TT), cisplatin, gemcitabine, and low-dose interferon-alpha (IFN-α). The Phase II component aimed to assess which cancer diagnoses responded to the regimen, the response rate, and response duration.

Materials and methods: The protocol design derived from a schedule-optimized preclinical regimen. Drugs were administered together, and also with thermal therapy in a schedule that optimized the therapeutic index. Eligible patients were those with therapy-resistant, metastatic or advanced solid malignancies. Beginning at 40 mg/m², the cisplatin dose was escalated by 10 mg/m² to the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) in successive cohorts of 3 patients. A treatment cycle consisted of cisplatin on day one, followed by thermal therapy and simultaneous gemcitabine 36 hours later; then a second dose of gemcitabine one week later; and daily IFN- α.

Results: Thirty-seven patients were treated on protocol. The MTD of cisplatin in the thermochemotherapy regimen was established to be 60 mg/m². The dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were peripheral neuropathy and ototoxicity. Complete and partial responses combined were 43%. The therapy improved the quality of life of responding patients.

Conclusion: The protocol was well tolerated and was associated with antitumor activity in patients with a variety of advanced metastatic solid tumors. Tumor response occurred with the thermochemotherapy treatment despite treating malignancies that had progressed on the same chemotherapy drugs administered as standard treatment. Notably, good responses were observed in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine and pancreas cancers. This regimen will be tested in a phase II study.     

A phase I and pharmacologic study of capecitabine and paclitaxel in?breast?cancer patients

Background:Based on preclinical studies demonstrating that treatment with paclitaxel upregulates intratumoral thymidine phosphorylase (dTHdPase), which catalyzes the final step in the conversion of the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), as well as the overlapping spectra of activity for these agents, particularly in metastatic breast cancer, this phase I study evaluated the feasibility of administering capecitabine on an intermittent schedule in combination with paclitaxel in previously-treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The study also sought to recommend doses for subsequent disease-specific studies, identify clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions, and detect preliminary antitumor activity. Patients and methods:Nineteen previously treated women with metastatic breast cancer whose prior treatment included neither paclitaxel or capecitabine received one hundred one courses of capecitabine and paclitaxel. Paclitaxel was administered as a three-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion at a fixed dose of 175 mg/m² and capecitabine was administered as 2 divided daily doses for 14 days followed by a seven-day rest period every 3 weeks. The dose of capecitabine was increased from a starting dose of 1650 mg/m²/d. The plasma sampling scheme in the first course permitted characterization of the pharmacokinetics of each agent given alone and concurrently to detect major pharmacokinetic interactions. Results:Palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia (hand–foot syndrome) and neutropenia were the principal dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Other toxicities included diarrhea and transient hyperbilirubinemia. Three of eight new patients treated with capecitabine 2000 mg/m²/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m² experienced DLT in the first course, whereas none of eleven new patients treated with capecitabine 1650 mg/m²/d and paclitaxel 175 mg/m² developed DLT. Pharmacokinetic studies indicated that capecitabine did not grossly affect the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, and there were no major effects of paclitaxel on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and capecitabine metabolites. However, AUC values for the major 5-FU catabolite, fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL), were significantly lower in the presence of paclitaxel. Two complete and seven partial responses (56% response rate) were observed in sixteen patients with measurable disease; four of six patients whose disease was previously treated with high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem-cell support had major responses. Seven of nineteen patients had stable disease as their best response. Conclusions:Recommended combination doses of capecitabine on an intermittent schedule and paclitaxel are capecitabine 1650 mg/m²/d orally for 14 days and paclitaxel 175 mg/m² i.v. every 3 weeks. The favorable preclinical interactions between capecitabine and paclitaxel, as well as the acceptable toxicity profile and antitumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer, support further clinical evaluations to determine an optimal role for the combination of capecitabine and paclitaxel in breast cancer and other relevant malignancies.     

Induction Chemotherapy to Weekly Paclitaxel Concurrent with Curative Radiotherapy in Stage IV (M0) Unresectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Dose Escalation Study

Abstract

The purpose was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly paclitaxel with concurrent, daily irradiation in patients with unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma previously submitted to induction chemotherapy. Patients with stage IV, and unresectable tumor and/or node/s were enrolled. Nine male patients were submitted to a course of paclitaxel 175 mg/m² day 1 and cis-platin 75 mg/m² day 2 given every 3 weeks for three courses. Curative radiothera-py (RT) started 3 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy with the goal of deliv-ering a total dose of 66-70 Gy. During RT weekly paclitaxel was administered for 6 courses if feasible; paclitaxel was given according to a dose escalation schema in cohorts of three patients. Dose level A, 30 mg/m²; dose level B, 40 mg/m²; dose level C, 50 mg/m². During weekly paclitaxel the major toxicity was mucositis that required a treatment break in two of three patients in dose level C; mucositis grade 4 required interruption of paclitaxel administration in all these patients. RT can be given in a continuous fashion with weekly paclitaxel after induction chemotherapy. The MTD of weekly paclitaxel was 40 mg/m².     

A phase I study of gemcitabine and epirubicin for the treatment of platinum-resistant or refractory advanced ovarian cancer

Background:Gemcitabine is active in patients with otherwiseresistant or refractory ovarian cancer. As the drug is well tolerated, studiesusing gemcitabine combined with other antineoplastic agents are needed. Theaim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) ofepirubicin combined with gemcitabine, with and without support of G-CSF. Patients and methods:Patients with platinum-resistant orrefractory ovarian cancer were eligible. Gemcitabine (G) (starting dose 800mg/m² day 1 and 8; 200 mg/m² escalation per level) andepirubicin (E) (starting dose 60 mg/m² day 1; 15 mg/m²escalation per level) were given every 21 days for four to six cycles. G-CSF(filgrastim 5 µg/kg/die) was given in case of grade 4 neutropenia(levels without support) or from day 9 up to leukocyte count>10,000/mm³ after nadir (levels with support). Cohorts of threepatients were enrolled at each level, and another three patients were planned,if one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was registered. MTD was determined firstwithout and then with G-CSF. Results:Four levels were studied (G 800 + E 60; G 1000 + E 60;G 1000 + E 75; G 1000 + E 75 + G-CSF) with four, four, three and threepatients enrolled, respectively. DLT (grade 4 febrile neutropenia) wasobserved in two patients at level 3. Thus, G1000 + E 60 mg/m² wasthe MTD without G-CSF. The addition of prophylactic G-CSF did not allow afurther increase of the dose and grade 4 thrombocytopenia was the DLT at level4. Non-hematological toxicity was mild. Grade 2 mucositis was reported in fourpatients. Among the 13 patients with measurable or evaluable disease, 3partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 23.1%. Conclusions:The combination of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m²(day 1, 8) and epirubicin at 60 mg/m² (day 1) is a feasibletherapy. Grade 4 neutropenia is frequent and G-CSF support is often required.With prophylactic support of G-CSF, the DLT is thrombocytopenia.     

Phase I dose escalation study of weekly ixabepilone, an epothilone analog, in patients with advanced solid tumors who have failed standard therapy

Purpose  To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), safety and recommended Phase II dose of ixabepilone, administered weekly as an intravenous (IV) infusion to patients with solid tumors who have failed standard therapy. Method  This was an open-label, single-arm, Phase I, dose-escalation study. Results  The MTD of ixabepilone [30-min, weekly IV infusion on a 21-day schedule (N = 33)] was established at 25 mg/m². Grade 3 fatigue was the DLT in 2/4 patients treated at 30 mg/m². Ixabepilone was well tolerated at the MTD. Myelosuppression was rare, with no Grade 3/4 neutropenia. Due to the potential for cumulative neurotoxicity, the protocol was amended to a 1-h infusion, weekly for 3 weeks with a 1-week break. No DLT occurred at starting doses of 15, 20 and 25 mg/m² on this modified schedule (N = 51), although overall toxicity was less at 15 and 20 mg/m² than 25 mg/m². Five patients (2 on the 30-min/21-day schedule and 3 on the 60-min/28-day schedule) achieved durable objective partial responses across a variety of tumor types. Conclusions  Ixabepilone had an acceptable safety profile at the MTD of 25 mg/m² (as a 30-min weekly infusion on a continuous 21-day schedule) and at 20 mg/m² (as a 1-h weekly infusion on a modified 28-day schedule). The clinical activity and acceptable tolerability profile warrant further single- or combination-agent evaluation.     

Phase I/II trial of combination therapy with S-1 and weekly paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer

Purpose  We aimed to examine the safety and antitumor effects of a combination of S-1 and paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer in a phase I/II setting. Patients and methods  The study was designed as a phase I/II clinical trial. In phase I portion, the dose of paclitaxel was escalated to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel with fixed dose of S-1. S-1 (daily dose, 80 mg/m²) was given orally on days 1–21 every 35-day cycle (rest on days 22–35). Paclitaxel was administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15, at an initial dose of 40 mg/m², stepping up to 70 mg/m² in 10-mg/m² increment. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 hematological toxicity, grade 3 or higher nonhematological toxicity, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions during the first course of treatment. In phase II portion, the efficacy and toxicity at the RD of paclitaxel with S-1 were assessed. Results  The MTD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 60 mg/m², because >33.3% of patients (2/3) developed DLTs. DLT included postponement of treatment due to grade 2 neutropenia, and grade 3 stomatitis, anorexia, and nausea. Therefore, the RD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 50 mg/m². In the phase II portion, 22 patients were evaluated with 50 mg/m² paclitaxel and 80 mg/m² S-1 in a 35-day cycle. The response rate was 54.5% (95% CI, 32.2–75.6%). The median survival time was 283 days (95% CI, 218–508 days). The median number of treatment courses was 4 (range 1–10), indicating that this regimen could be given repeatedly. Conclusions  This phase I/II trial of combination therapy with S-1 and paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer showed that this regimen has substantial antitumor activity and can be given safely.     

Weekday on-weekend off oral capecitabine: a phase I study of a continuous schedule better simulating protracted fluoropyrimidine therapy

Background Although protracted intravenous 5-fluorouracil is superior to bolus regimens in terms of tumour exposure to the drug during DNA synthesis as well as activity and safety, the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is administered intermittently. In this phase I study, we investigated an alternative, dose-intense continuous regimen. Materials and methods Oral capecitabine was administered twice daily continuously with weekend breaks, in patients with advanced solid tumours refractory to standard therapy. Dose escalation proceeded from 1,331 to 2,510 mg/m² daily. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) consisted of any grade-3 or 4 adverse event except for alopecia and skin toxicity resolving within 7 days. Results Twenty-five heavily pretreated patients participated in the study. No DLT occurred in the first four cohorts. Two out of four patients developed grade III diarrhoea in the fourth week of capecitabine at 2,510 mg/m² (DLT). The most common toxic episodes during all cycles of treatment were grade 1–2 fatigue, skin erythema, abdominal cramps, nausea, constipation and neutropenia. Disease regression was seen in three and stabilisation with clinical benefit in ten patients (clinical benefit response 54%). Pharmacokinetic studies of capecitabine and metabolites in four patients at 2,250 mg/m² daily showed rapid absorption, short plasma half-lives with the exception of FBAL and absence of accumulation or conversion saturation during the course of therapy. At this dose, administered dose intensity in eight patients was 99.3% of the planned one. Conclusions Weekday on-weekend off capecitabine maximizes cytotoxic impact on tumour cells during S-phase by safely simulating protracted fluoropyrimidine therapy at a recommended dose (2,250 mg/m²) close to that of the intermittent schedule and clearly higher than the continuous one of 1,331 mg/m². This study was supported by a research grant from Roche Hellas, Athens, Greece.     

A dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of the biweekly administration of paclitaxel, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of the paclitaxel, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin combination administered biweekly in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Patients and methods

Patients received escalated doses of paclitaxel (starting dose: 100 mg/m²), gemcitabine (starting dose: 800 mg/m²) and oxaliplatin (starting dose: 50 mg/m²) on days 1 and 15 in cycles of every 4 weeks. DLTs were evaluated during the first cycle.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (median age 65 years) with performance status 0–1 were treated on six dose escalation levels. Eleven patients (40.7%) were chemotherapy naïve, six (22.2%) had received 1 prior chemotherapy regimen and ten (37.1%) 2 or more. The DLT level was reached at the doses of paclitaxel 110 mg/m², gemcitabine 1,150 mg/m² and LOHP 70 mg/m². The dose-limiting events were grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event. A median of 3 cycles per patient was administered. One complete and five partial responses were observed in patients with ovarian carcinoma, NSCLC, urothelial cancer, mesothelioma and cancer of unknown primary. No pharmacokinetic drug interactions were detected.

Conclusions

The recommended doses for future phase II studies of this combination are paclitaxel 110 mg/m², gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² and oxaliplatin 70 mg/m² every 2 weeks. The regimen is generally well tolerated and merits further evaluation.     

A phase I trial of 96-hour paclitaxel infusion plus accelerated radiotherapy of unrespectable head and neck cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel given as a 96-hour continuous infusion during Weeks 1 and 5 of an accelerated radiotherapy schedule for the definitive treatment of advanced (nonmetastatic) unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirteen patients with Stage IV SCCHN were enrolled. Radiotherapy consisted of 70-72 Gy over 6 weeks, with a fractionation scheme of 2 Gy q.d. for 4 weeks followed by 1.6 Gy b.i.d. for 2 weeks, with no planned interruptions. Paclitaxel was administered over a 96-hour continuous infusion during Weeks 1 and 5 of radiotherapy at the following dose levels: Dose Level 1: 40 mg/m(2)/96-hours (3 patients); Dose Level 2: 80 mg/m(2)/96-hrs (5 patients); Dose Level 3: 120 mg/m(2)/96-hours (2 patients); and Dose Level 2A: 100 mg/m(2)/96-hours (3 patients). RESULTS: The MTD of Paclitaxel was 100 mg/m(2)/96-hours. All but one patient (who experienced progressive disease after receiving 61 Gy and both cycles of paclitaxel) completed therapy as planned. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in both patients enrolled at Dose Level 3, with one patient experiencing Grade 4 diffuse moist desquamation and the other patient experiencing Grade 4 mucositis and febrile neutropenia. Thus, Dose Level 2A was opened and no dose limiting toxicity was noted. Grade 3 non-dose limiting mucositis and dermatitis occurred at all paclitaxel dose levels. There were no treatment-related deaths. All Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reversible. Complete responses were seen in 8 of 13 patients, 4 patients achieved partial responses, and 1 patient had no response/progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Infusional paclitaxel over 96 hours during Weeks 1 and 5 of this accelerated radiotherapy schedule is feasible. The MTD of paclitaxel in this protocol was 100 mg/m(2)/96-hours. Dose-limiting toxicities were primarily enhanced epithelial reactions, but febrile neutropenia also occurred. All patients develop non-dose limiting Grade 3 skin and mucosal reactions, reflecting the high treatment intensity. This regimen merits further investigation.     

Dose-escalation study of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine combined with capecitabine in advanced solid malignancies

Purpose  To define dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine with fixed-dose rate (FDR) gemcitabine. Methods  Eligible adults (advanced solid tumor; performance status ≤2) received capecitabine 500 mg/m² PO BID days 1–14 and FDR gemcitabine (400–1,000 mg/m² escalated by 200 mg/m² increments) at 10 mg/m²/min days 1 and 8 on a 21-day cycle. A traditional 3 + 3 cohort design was used to determine the MTD. Results  Thirty patients (median age 59 years) were enrolled. The predominant grade ≥3 toxicity was myelosuppression, particularly neutropenia. At dose level 4 (1,000 mg/m² gemcitabine), two out of five evaluable patients had a DLT (grade 4 neutropenia ≥7 days). At dose level 3 (800 mg/m² gemcitabine), one patient had a DLT (grade 3 neutropenia ≥7 days) among six evaluable patients. Therefore, the MTD and recommended phase II dose was designated as capecitabine 500 mg/m² PO BID days 1–14 with 800 mg/m² FDR gemcitabine days 1 and 8 infused at 10 mg/m² per min on a 21-day cycle. Partial responses occurred in pretreated patients with esophageal, renal cell and bladder carcinomas. Conclusions  This regimen was well tolerated and may deserve evaluation in advanced gastrointestinal and genitourinary carcinomas. The results of this research appeared as abstract ID 13509 at the 2008 American Association of Clinical Oncology meeting in Chicago, IL, USA.     

Paclitaxel by 72-hour continuous infusion followed by bolus intravenous ifosfamide or epirubicin: results of two phase I studies

STUDY PURPOSES: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered by 72-hour continuous infusion followed by bolus intravenous ifosfamide on days 4 and 5 or epirubicin on day 4, every 21 days. To assess the toxicity and preliminary activity in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with progressive disease after standard chemotherapy for advanced disease were treated with the combination paclitaxel-ifosfamide and 10 patients with the combination paclitaxel-epirubicin. RESULTS: In the first phase I study the MTDs were: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 2.5 mg/m2/day; hematologic toxicity was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first cycle of therapy at dose level 4. Paclitaxel administered at 135 mg/m2 and epirubicin 50 mg/m2 were the MTDs in the second phase I study; grade 4 stomatitis was the DLT of this combination. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel by 72-hour continuous infusion followed by bolus ifosfamide was a manageable regimen with an acceptable hematologic toxicity in the absence of neurotoxicity. Preliminary activity of this combination was encouraging in a group of patients with ovarian cancer. The optimal way to combine paclitaxel and epirubicin and the best schedule relative to such a long paclitaxel infusion time in this combination regimen remain to be determined.     

Phase I trial of dose escalation of capecitabine combined with fixed docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

Capecitabine combined with docetaxel have demonstrated antitumor synergy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to absence of phase I trial in China, we conducted this study to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine with fixed docetaxel for Chinese patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Methods

Previously treated patients with NSCLC were entered into this study. Escalating doses of capecitabine with fixed docetaxel were administered in a modified Fibonacci sequence. The initial doses were capecitabine 625 mg/m², bid, on days d5?Cd18, and docetaxel 30 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, respectively. The regimen was repeated every 21 days. If no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed, the next dose level was applied. The procedures were repeated until DLT appeared. The MTD was declared to be one dose level below the level at which DLT appeared.

Results

Eighteen patients received 67 cycles at capecitabine of level I (1250 mg/m², divided into 625 mg/m², bid) and level II (1500 mg/m², 750 mg/m², bid). The most common toxicities were neutropenia, hand and feet syndrome, fatigue and nausea. Eight DLTs occurred in 5 patients in the whole group, including 1 DLT in dose level I and 7 DLTs in dose level 2. Since 4 of 6 patients in level II experienced DLTs, we declared thus level I was MTD.

Conclusion

MTD of our phase I trial was capecitabine of 1250 mg/m²/d combined with docetaxel of 30 mg/m²/wk. This combination regimen was well tolerated for previously treated patients with NSCLC. The efficacy of this schedule is currently being further evaluated in a prospective phase II trial.