Factors influencing discussion of smoking between general practitioners and patients who smoke: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Anti-smoking advice from general practitioners (GPs) is effective and recent evidence-based guidelines urge GPs to advise all patients against smoking at every opportunity. GPs do not exploit many opportunities to discuss smoking with patients and the reasons for this are unclear. AIM: To elicit, relate, and interpret GPs' accounts of why they discuss smoking with some patients and not others. METHOD: Thirty-nine Leicestershire GPs were purposively selected so as to have a range of attitudes towards discussing smoking with patients. Each GP had one surgery session video-recorded and afterwards participated in a qualitative, semi-structured interview. Prior to each interview, GPs were shown a video-recording of one of their consultations with a smoker to enhance their recall of events. RESULTS: Being aware of patients' smoking status did not necessarily result in GPs discussing smoking with patients. GPs were keen to preserve good doctor-patient relationships and avoid negative responses from patients once the topic of smoking had been raised, and this was felt to be best achieved by restricting most discussions about smoking to situations where patients presented with smoking-related problems and in circumstances where the doctors perceived the doctor-patient relationship was strong. Doctors also thought it important to address patients' agendas relating to the current consultation before discussing smoking. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners have strong reasons for preferring to discuss smoking when patients present with smoking-related problems. Those wishing to increase the amount of advice-giving by GPs might be more successful if they encouraged GPs to make greater use of problem-orientated opportunities to discuss smoking.     

Factors associated with the provision of anti-smoking advice by general practitioners.

The acceptability of advice about smoking in the consultation has recently been questioned. We report a study that explored patients' attitudes to general practitioners' (GPs) anti-smoking advice and the characteristics of patients with whom GPs chose to discuss smoking. Patients who recalled the advice were generally positive about stopping smoking. This could be explained by the observation that GPs were more likely to advise smokers who perceived their problems to be smoking-related and were more motivated to stop smoking. The implications of this finding are discussed.     

Qualitative study investigating the process of giving anti-smoking advice in general practice

General practitioners' (GPs') anti-smoking advice promotes patients' smoking cessation but little is known about how GPs use their short consultations to give advice. We used semi-structured interviews with 27 UK GPs to investigate how GPs believe they should advise smokers to stop and the reasons underpinning these beliefs. GPs reported a limited repertoire of techniques for dealing with smokers who were not motivated to stop. They also reported using confrontational advice-giving styles with patients who continued to smoke despite suffering from smoking-related illnesses. GPs might find it easier and more rewarding to discuss smoking with patients if they possessed a greater range of skills for dealing with non-motivated smokers.     

Anti-smoking advice from general practitioners: is a population-based approach to advice-giving feasible?

General practitioners' (GPs') advice against smoking has a small, beneficial effect on patients' smoking. Consequently, GPs have been urged to adopt a population-based approach to advice-giving that involves discussing smoking repeatedly with the maximum possible number of smokers. This discussion paper assesses how far GPs' current clinical practice is from a population-based approach to advice-giving and finds that GPs prefer a problem-orientated approach to advising those who present with smoking-related problems. Discussion focuses on the feasibility of suggesting that GPs adopt a population-based approach instead.     

Triggering anti-smoking advice by GPs: mode of action of an intervention stimulating smoking cessation advice by GPs

OBJECTIVE: To assess the mode of action of an intervention (GP desktop resource, GDR) that increased the frequency of general practitioner (GP) advice to stop smoking. METHODS: Analyses were undertaken to differentiate between three hypotheses regarding the mode of action of the GDR. That the GDR acts: (1) by altering GPs' attitudes, (2) independently of attitudes in prompting GPs to intervene with smokers or (3) by altering the relationship between attitudes and behaviour. RESULTS: The GDR was an independent predictor of the number of patients advised to stop smoking (beta = .345, p < .001). Concern about the doctor-patient relationship was the only attitude variable that independently predicted advice giving, in this case negatively (beta = -.465, p < .001). Possession of the GDR did not alter GPs' views on whether intervening with smokers harmed the doctor-patient relationship, but did weaken the relationship between this attitude item and the number of patients advised to stop smoking (beta = .595, p < .001 for the interaction). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to show that concern over the doctor-patient relationship was an independent predictor of advice giving while in other studies it has merely been noted as something that GPs express concern about. A simple device designed to trigger action on the part of GPs appeared to work by mitigating the negative effect of an attitudinal barrier to action. It would be interesting to explore this phenomenon more generally in relation to health promotion activities on the part of health professionals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Recommendations that GPs engage in health promotion activities with their patients need to consider that GPs' concerns over harming the doctor-patient relationship may deter them from making such interventions. The GDR appears to be effective in prompting GPs to advise their smoking patients to stop and its widespread distribution to GPs should be considered.     

Comparison of the smoking behaviour and attitudes of smokers who attribute respiratory symptoms to smoking with those who do not.

General practitioners' (GPs') advice against smoking helps smokers to stop; unfortunately, GPs cannot predict which patients will quit following advice. This postal questionnaire survey suggests that where smokers attribute their respiratory symptoms to smoking, they are eight times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.0-23.3) more likely to believe that their health will improve if they stop smoking and six times (95% CI = 1.4-23.3) more likely to intend to stop smoking.     

Physician delivery of smoking prevention counseling to young patients in the United Arab Emirates

OBJECTIVE: To describe the delivery of smoking preventive counseling to preadolescent, adolescent, and young adult patients in an Arab population, and to examine counseling behavior according to physician demographic characteristics and perceived barriers to counseling. METHODS: A cross-sectional mail survey was carried out among general practitioners (GPs) in private practice in the Emirates of Sharjah, Dubai and Abu Dhabi. RESULTS: Of 391 eligible GPs, 218 (56%) completed the questionnaire. Overall 29, 50 and 65% of GPs offered preventive advice to preadolescents (9-12 years), adolescents (13-19 years) and young adults (20-24 years), respectively. Lack of patient educational materials was cited by 71.8% of GPs as a very important barrier to offering smoking prevention counseling, followed by lack of community resources (66.5%) and lack of time (62.2%). Older age, male gender, and having knowledge of the stages of change were positively associated with offering preventive advice. CONCLUSION: Physician self-reports of their smoking prevention counseling practices suggest there is opportunity for improvement. More training and support is needed to improve and encourage physician adherence to current smoking prevention counseling guidelines. PRACTICE IMPLICATION: More research is needed to determine the most effective method to improve delivery of preventive care by GPs, and to communicate appropriate preventive or cessation messages.     

Keeping morality out and the GP in. Consultations in Danish general practice as a context for smoking cessation advice

OBJECTIVE: To describe consultations in Danish general practice as a context for a mass strategy of smoking cessation advice. METHODS: The focus of the study was on consultations for health problems that were not related to smoking. Interviews with eleven patients and their six GPs were grounded in observation of their own consultations. RESULTS: Patients and GPs agreed that the GP should adopt an attitude of moral acceptance towards patients. Ideals of moral acceptance of patients in general practice consultations were challenged by the prevailing negative moral values associated with smoking. A general aim of mutuality in the conversation in consultations could not always be achieved in smoking cessation advice. Achieving mutuality was especially a problem when smoking cessation advice was repeated at short intervals. CONCLUSION: Two elements of Danish general practice consultations were challenged by smoking cessation advice to patients without smoking-related illness: the ideal of moral acceptance of patients in general practice consultations held by GPs and patients and the wish for mutuality in the conversation during consultations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A conversation about smoking based on motivational interviewing would fit in the context of Danish general practice. Relieving the conversation of blocks due to moral implications, however, is still a challenge.     

Provision of smoking cessation counseling by general practitioners assisted by training and screening procedure

OBJECTIVE: To examine which counseling behavior among GPs can be achieved after counseling training when organizational support is provided. METHODS: A random sample of 39 general practices was drawn, 34 took part. GPs received a pre-study assessment followed by a training session for smoking counseling. All patients showing up during a period of 1 week were asked about smoking status. Current smokers, aged 18-70 years were eligible (N=551), 81.8% participated. A documentation sheet, filled in by a study nurse transferred smoking-related information about patient to the GP. GPs were advised to fill in a post-counseling assessment for every patient. A post-study assessment with the GPs was conducted. RESULTS: Frequent barriers for smoking counseling were lack of time and the assumption that patients were not motivated to quit. The GP's documented smoking counseling in 96.0%. The patients (87.8%) could be thoroughly counseled. Younger age of the GP, a high number of patients and the contemplation stage quitting smoking were predictors for realizing counseling. 79.3% of the GPs assessed the procedure to be practicable. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking counseling in the general practice is feasible. PRACTICE IMPLICATION: Involving staff in the screening procedure may support counseling activity of the GP.     

Developing and maintaining patients’ trust during general practice consultations: The case of smoking cessation advice

Objective

The aim of this paper is to describe how the process of developing and maintaining trust is related to how and if smoking cessation advice is given in general practice consultations.

Methods

The study consisted of interviews with six Danish GPs and with 11 of their patients, on the basis of observations of their consultations.

Results

According to the findings of this study, both the GPs and the patients expected GPs to demonstrate in interaction with the patients their intent to evaluate and possibly resolve the patient's health problem. The GPs were also expected to show that they recognized the patient's health problem. Both GPs and patients felt that this would help to develop patients’ trust in their GPs. Smoking cessation advice during consultations could negate these demonstrations of GPs intents. Smoking cessation advice, however, could demonstrate interest and a desire to help and so develop trust.

Conclusion

Smoking cessation advice has the potential both to put trust under strain and to strengthen trust. The outcome depends on whether the advice conforms to what both patients and GPs expect from the interaction in general practice consultations.

Practice implications

To develop and maintain patients’ trust GPs should consider the specific expectations from the interaction with patients during consultations when giving smoking cessation advice.     

The role of the general practitioner in postnatal care: a survey from Australian general practice.

BACKGROUND: Despite the practice of routine postnatal check-ups, many women experience problems in the months after childbirth. General practitioners (GPs) are involved in routine postnatal care, yet little research has been undertaken to explore this role. AIM: To report the views of Australian GPs as to what physical examination and discussion should take place at the routine six week postnatal check-up and to determine the influence of gender on the approach to the check-up. METHOD: Postal survey of 1104 Australian GPs, yielding an eligible sample of 1022. RESULTS: A total of 715/1022 (70%) usable surveys returned. Over 65% of GPs recommend routine examination of the abdomen, blood pressure, perineum, vagina, pelvic floor, and breasts at the six week check-up. Fewer than a half the sample believed that physical problems (urine and bowel symptoms, back problems), sexual issues, relationship and parenting issues should be routinely discussed. After controlling for age, practice location, obstetric practice, and qualifications, the sex of the GP remains an important factor influencing the GP's approach to postnatal care. Female GPs are three times more likely to believe that maternal feelings should be discussed routinely and about twice as likely to believe that infant sleeping/behaviour, maternal sleeping/diet/tiredness, coping with other children, relationship with partner, and household work should form part of the routine discussion with all recent mothers. CONCLUSIONS: Sex of practitioner and older age (60 years or more) are the two most important influences on a GP's approach to postnatal care. This study indicates a need for GPs to shift their focus from routine examination to indicated examination to allow more time to discuss common postnatal problems.     

Factors influencing European GPs' engagement in smoking cessation: a multi-country literature review

Background

Smoking cessation advice by GPs is an effective and cost-effective intervention, but is not implemented as widely as it could be.

Aim

This wide-ranging Europe-wide literature review, part of the European Union (EU) PESCE (General Practitioners and the Economics of Smoking Cessation in Europe) project, explored the extent of GPs'' engagement in smoking cessation and the factors that influence their engagement.

Method

Two searches were conducted, one for grey literature, across all European countries, and one for academic studies. Data from eligible studies published from 1990 onwards were synthesised and reported under four categories of influencing factors: GP characteristics, patient characteristics, structural factors, and cessation-specific knowledge and skills.

Results

The literature showed that most GPs in Europe question the smoking status of all new patients but fewer routinely ask this of regular patients, or advise smokers to quit. The proportion offering intensive interventions or prescribing treatments is lower still. Factors influencing GPs'' engagement in smoking cessation include GPs'' own smoking status and their attitudes towards giving smoking cessation advice; whether patients present with smoking-related symptoms, are pregnant, or heavy smokers; time, training, and reimbursement are important structural factors; and some GPs lack knowledge and skills regarding the use of specific cessation methods and treatments, or have limited awareness of specialist cessation services. No single factor or category of factors explains the variations in GPs'' engagement in smoking cessation.

Conclusion

Strategies to improve the frequency and quality of GPs'' engagement in smoking cessation need to address the multifaceted influences on GPs'' practice and to reflect the widely differing contexts across Europe.     

The Role of eHealth in Optimizing Preventive Care in the Primary Care Setting

Modifiable health risk behaviors such as smoking, overweight and obesity, risky alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, and poor nutrition contribute to a substantial proportion of the world’s morbidity and mortality burden. General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in identifying and managing modifiable health risk behaviors. However, these are often underdetected and undermanaged in the primary care setting. We describe the potential of eHealth to help patients and GPs to overcome some of the barriers to managing health risk behaviors. In particular, we discuss (1) the role of eHealth in facilitating routine collection of patient-reported data on lifestyle risk factors, and (2) the role of eHealth in improving clinical management of identified risk factors through provision of tailored feedback, point-of-care reminders, tailored educational materials, and referral to online self-management programs. Strategies to harness the capacity of the eHealth medium, including the use of dynamic features and tailoring to help end users engage with, understand, and apply information need to be considered and maximized. Finally, the potential challenges in implementing eHealth solutions in the primary care setting are discussed. In conclusion, there is significant potential for innovative eHealth solutions to make a contribution to improving preventive care in the primary care setting. However, attention to issues such as data security and designing eHealth interfaces that maximize engagement from end users will be important to moving this field forward.     

Sequence-analysis of video-recorded practitioner–patient communication about smoking in general practice: Do smokers express negative statements about quitting?

Objective

To examine the extent to which smokers express negative statements about quitting and the extent to which these statements influence general practitioners’ (GPs’) and practice nurses’ (PNs’) (dis)continuation of guideline-recommended smoking cessation care.

Methods

Fifty-two video-consultations were observed (GP-consultations: 2007–2008; PN-consultations: 2010–2011). Dialogues were transcribed verbatim and professionals’ and patients’ speech units were coded and analysed using sequential analyses (n = 1424 speech units).

Results

GPs focused on asking about smoking (GPs: 42.4% versus PNs: 26.2%, p = 0.011) and advising them to quit (GPs: 15.3% versus PNs: 3.5%, p < 0.001), whereas PNs focused on assisting them with quitting (GPs: 25.4% versus PNs: 55.2%, p < 0.001). Overall, patients expressed more negative statements about quitting than positive statements (negative: 25.3% versus positive: 11.9%, p < 0.001), especially when PNs assessed their willingness to quit (OR 3.61, 95% CI 1.44–9.01) or assisted them with quitting (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.43–3.48).

Practice implications

An alternative approach to smoking cessation care is proposed in which GPs’ tasks are limited to asking, advising, and arranging follow-up. This approach seems the least likely to evoke negative statements of patients about quitting during dialogues with GPs and is compatible with the tasks and skills of PNs who could, subsequently, assist smokers with quitting.     

Does the smoking status of general practitioners affect the efficacy of smoking cessation counselling?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the smoking status of general practitioners (GPs) and abstinence rates among patients receiving GP-delivered brief advice for smoking cessation. METHODS: A quasi-experimental multilevel study with follow-up assessments at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after baseline was conducted using a random sample of 39 general practices in a defined area (participation rate=87.2%). Patients aged 18-70 were consecutively screened for smoking status (n=11,560) over the course of 3 weeks and were assigned to a control group (week 1), a computer expert system intervention (week 2), or a personal counselling intervention with the GP (week 3). For the current analysis, patients participating in study week 2 were excluded. A total of 1260 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 80.2% took part: 609 patients in study week 1 and 402 patients from study week 3. GPs participated in a training session concerning smoking counselling, which was held between study weeks 2 and 3. Self-reported 4-week and 6-month prolonged abstinence measures at the 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-ups were assessed. RESULTS: The smoking status of the GP was neither significantly related to 4-week prolonged abstinence nor 6-month prolonged abstinence among patients in a main effects model. Further modelling revealed that the intervention group modified the effect of the non-smoking status of the GP on the likelihood to quit smoking. A significant interactive effect was found between the non-smoking status of the GP and the intervention group on both abstinence measures. CONCLUSION: The non-smoking status of the GP had a positive effect among counselled patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The consideration of lifestyle behavioural variables such as the smoking status of the GP will be essential for further research concerning the efficacy of smoking interventions.     

Multifaceted support to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a nationwide, controlled trial in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Multifaceted interventions improve the quality of preventive cardiovascular care in general practice when applied in small-scale research trials. AIM: To test the transferability of observations from research trials on preventive cardiovascular care to a real-world situation and, therefore, evaluate the effectiveness of a nationwide project with a large number of practices. The intervention comprised a combination of conferences, dissemination of manuals, and support from trained non-physicians during outreach visits. DESIGN OF STUDY: A controlled before-and-after trial with two arms: multifaceted support versus no special attention. Analysis after 2 years. SETTING: 617 general practices in The Netherlands. METHOD: Outcomes measures were the compliance rates for 15 indicators. Structure-of-care indicators included the use of reminders, specific computer files, written protocols, and special clinics. Process-of-care indicators included the assessment of modifiable risk factors and use of a minimal contact intervention (MCI) for smoking cessation. Compliance of general practitioners (GPs) was assessed using self-administered questionnaires. RESULTS: The intervention group improved on all eight of the structure-of-care indicators when compared to the control group. A positive effect was also found on the extent to which the GPs measured blood pressure in 60-year-old patients and on the use of an MCI for smoking cessation. No effect was found on the completeness of the risk-factor profiles that the GPs assessed in specific groups of high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: The nationwide intervention appeared to improve certain aspects of preventive cardiovascular care. Nevertheless, the National Association of GPs decided to stop the project. This decision was made within the context of discussions about the heavy workloads and insufficient incomes being experienced by GPs.     

The workload of general practitioners does not affect their awareness of patients' psychological problems

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if general practitioners (GPs) with a higher workload are less inclined to encourage their patients to disclose psychological problems, and are less aware of their patients' psychological problems. METHODS: Data from 2095 videotaped consultations from a representative selection of 142 Dutch GPs were used. Multilevel regression analyses were performed with the GPs' awareness of the patient's psychological problems and their communication as outcome measures, the GPs' workload as a predictor, and GP and patient characteristics as confounders. RESULTS: GPs' workload is not related to their awareness of psychological problems and hardly related to their communication, except for the finding that a GP with a subjective experience of a lack of time is less patient-centred. Showing eye contact or empathy and asking questions about psychological or social topics are associated with more awareness of patients' psychological problems. CONCLUSION: Patients' feelings of distress are more important for GPs' communication and their awareness of patients' psychological problems than a long patient list or busy moment of the day. GPs who encourage the patient to disclose their psychological problems are more aware of psychological problems. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We recommend that attention is given to all the communication skills required to discuss psychological problems, both in the consulting room and in GPs' training. Additionally, attention for gender differences and stress management is recommended in GPs' training.     

Smoking behavior and opinions of French general practitioners

This report examines smoking prevalence, sociodemographic factors, and the opinions of French general practitioners (GPs) about tobacco control policies. Data from the CFES (Comité Fran?ais d'Education pour la Santé) national survey on general practitioners included 1013 respondents. The questionnaire was administered by telephone and a response rate of 65% was attained. Instrumentation included variables related to medical practice, sociodemographic characteristics, and opinions about health behavior. Thirty-four percent of physicians were current smokers. A higher proportion of males smoked compared to women (36.1% vs. 24.9%, p < 0.01), and they consumed on average more cigarettes per day (11.2 vs. 8 cigarettes/day, p < 0.05). Slightly more than 52% of physicians regarded their role in reducing nicotine addiction to be important. Doctors who believed that the physician's role was limited were less likely to advise pregnant women to stop smoking (odds ratio = 0.39, p < 0.001), and nonsmokers were more supportive of bans on smoking in public places. Despite the high prevalence of smoking among French physicians, they can still play an important role in reducing smoking among their patients. Medical school curriculum and continuing medical education programs focusing on prevention and cessation in France should be strengthened to help reduce smoking rates among physicians and the general population.