Pain-related catastrophizing in healthy women is associated with greater temporal summation of and reduced habituation to thermal pain

OBJECTIVE: Pain-related coping strategies, especially catastrophizing, play an influential role in shaping pain responses. However, although numerous studies have examined the impact of catastrophizing on chronic pain outcomes, relatively few have evaluated relationships between individual differences in pain-related catastrophizing and pain perception, with most of those studies examining only pain threshold or pain tolerance. We assessed, for the first time, catastrophizing's association with the magnitude of temporal summation of pain, a primary marker for central nervous system sensitizability. METHODS: Thirty-eight healthy young women underwent standardized experimental pain testing, followed by administration of a brief questionnaire that assessed catastrophizing cognitions during the pain-testing session. RESULTS: Higher levels of pain-related catastrophizing were related to higher suprathreshold pain ratings and greater temporal summation of thermal pain, suggesting that catastrophizing may play a facilitatory role in the processing of pain-related information, though the specific pathways underlying this facilitation are not clear. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings highlight the importance of coping in shaping individuals' responses to noxious stimuli, and suggest that interventions that decrease pain catastrophizing may reduce the burden of acute and chronic pain.     

Catastrophizing as a mediator of sex differences in pain: differential effects for daily pain versus laboratory-induced pain

Sex differences in the experience of pain have been widely reported, with females generally reporting more frequent clinical pain and demonstrating greater pain sensitivity. However, the mechanisms underpinning such differences, while subject to intense speculation, are not well-characterized. Catastrophizing is a cognitive and affective process that relates strongly to enhanced reports of pain and that varies as a function of sex. It is thus a prime candidate to explain sex differences; indeed, several prior studies offer evidence that controlling for catastrophizing eliminates the gap between men and women in reported pain. We recruited 198 healthy young adults (115 female) who took part in laboratory studies of pain responses, including thermal pain, cold pain, and ischemic pain, and who also completed questionnaires assessing catastrophizing, mood, and day-to-day painful symptoms (e.g. headache, backache). Women reported greater levels of catastrophizing, more recent painful symptoms, and demonstrated lower pain thresholds and tolerances for noxious heat and cold relative to men. Mediational analyses suggested that after controlling for negative mood, catastrophizing mediated the sex difference in recent daily pain but did not mediate the much larger sex differences in pain threshold and tolerance. These findings highlight the role of catastrophizing in shaping pain responses, as well as illuminating potentially important differences between experimental pain assessment and the clinical experience of pain.     

Anger as a Mechanism of Injustice Appraisals in Pediatric Chronic Pain

Mechanisms explaining the relationship between pain-related injustice appraisals and functional outcomes in youth with chronic pain have yet to be examined. In studies of adults, greater pain-related injustice is associated with worse depressive symptoms and greater pain through greater anger. No study to date has examined anger expression as a mediator in the relationships between pain-related injustice appraisals and physical and psychosocial functioning in youth with chronic pain. The current sample consisted of 385 youth with varied pain conditions (75% female, 88% White, M_age=14.4 years) presenting to a university-affiliated pain clinic. Patients completed self-report measures assessing anger expression (anger-out and anger-in), pain-related injustice, pain intensity, functional disability, and emotional, social, and school functioning. Bootstrapped mediation analyses indicated that only anger-out (indirect effect= -.12, 95% CI: -.21, -.05) mediated the relationship between pain-related injustice and emotional functioning, whereas both anger-out (indirect effect= -.17, 95% CI: -.27, -.09) and anger-in (indirect effect= -.13, 95% CI: -.09, -.001) mediated the relationship between pain-related injustice and social functioning. Neither mode of anger expression mediated the relationship between pain-related injustice and pain intensity, functional disability, or school functioning. Collectively, these findings implicate anger as one mechanism by which pain-related injustice impacts psychosocial outcomes for youth with chronic pain.PerspectiveAnger expression plays a mediating role in the relationship between pain-related injustice appraisals and psychosocial outcomes for youth with chronic pain. Anger represents one target for clinical care to decrease the deleterious impact of pain-related injustice on emotional and social functioning.     

Spousal responses are differentially associated with clinical variables in women and men with chronic pain

OBJECTIVES: Spousal responses have been related to clinical variables in patients with chronic pain. For example, solicitous responses from spouses have been associated with greater levels of pain and disability among patients with chronic pain. However, few investigators have determined whether spousal solicitousness produces different effects in women versus men with chronic pain. The present study examined pain reports, medication use, psychosocial factors, functional measures, and pain tolerance in patients with chronic pain. METHODS: Subjects included 114 female and 213 male chronic pain patients, who described their spouses as either high or low in solicitousness on the Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Measures of pain severity, affective distress, physical function, medication use, and pain tolerance were examined in women and men with high versus low scores on spousal solicitousness. RESULTS: Among males only, high spousal solicitousness was associated with greater numerical ratings of pain and greater self-reported disability compared with patients with low solicitous spouses. Among females only, the high spousal solicitousness patients showed lower pain tolerance, greater pain-related interference, poorer performance on functional tasks (eg, timed walking, lifting, and carrying tasks), and greater use of opioid medications. In both women and men, spousal solicitousness was associated with higher scores on the MPI pain severity scale. DISCUSSION: These results extend previous findings demonstrating a relationship between spousal responses and patients' adjustment to pain; however, the pattern of these effects appears to be moderated by the sex of the patient. Implications for assessment and treatment of chronic pain are discussed.     

Sex differences in responses to epidural steroid injection for low back pain.

Sex differences in clinical and experimental pain responses have been widely reported; however, few studies have examined sex differences in outcomes from interventional pain treatment and the predictors thereof. The aims of this study were to examine sex differences in (1) the acute pain produced by epidural steroid injections (ESIs), (2) clinical improvements in pain and pain-related psychological distress and disability after ESIs, and (3) predictors of the clinical response to ESIs. A total of 57 patients (37 menopausal women and 20 men), seen in the pain clinic of a regional medical center for ESI therapy, participated. Patients rated the painfulness of the ESI procedure itself. Also, clinical pain, depression, and disability were assessed before treatment and at 2 weeks and 2 months after the ESIs. Participants also were queried about their expectations of successful pain relief, coping strategies, and pain-related anxiety, which were examined as predictors of treatment outcome. Men reported significantly greater pain intensity and unpleasantness than women for the first injection only. All groups showed significant reductions in clinical pain, depression, and disability at 2 weeks compared to baseline, but minimal change occurred between 2 weeks and 2 months past baseline. No sex differences in the magnitude of treatment response emerged; however, specific dimensions of pain coping were associated with treatment responses in a sex-dependent manner. These findings suggest that the determinants of ESI pain and treatment outcome might differ across sex. PERSPECTIVE: Sex-related influences on pain responses have been widely reported, but few studies have explored sex-dependent predictors of treatment response. These findings indicate that pain coping was differentially associated with outcomes after ESI in women versus men.     

Pain-related anxiety influences pain perception differently in men and women: A quantitative sensory test across thermal pain modalities

The sexes differ with respect to perception of experimental pain. Anxiety influences pain perception more in men than in women; however, there lacks research exploring which anxiety constructs influence pain perception differentially between men and women. Furthermore, research examining whether depression is associated with pain perception differently between the sexes remains scant. The present investigation was designed to examine how trait anxiety, pain-related anxiety constructs (ie, fear of pain, pain-related anxiety, anxiety sensitivity), and depression are associated with pain perception between the sexes. A total of 95 nonclinical participants (55% women) completed measures assessing the constructs of interest and participated in quantitative sensory testing using heat and cold stimuli administered by a Medoc Pathway Pain and Sensory Evaluation System. The findings suggest that pain-related anxiety constructs, but not trait anxiety, are associated with pain perception. Furthermore, these constructs are associated with pain intensity ratings in men and pain tolerance levels in women. This contrasts with previous research suggesting that anxiety influences pain perception mostly or uniquely in men. Depression was not systematically associated with pain perception in either sex. Systematic relationships were not identified that allow conclusions regarding how fear of pain, pain-related anxiety, and anxiety sensitivity may contribute to pain perception differentially in men and women; however, anxiety sensitivity was associated with increased pain tolerance, a novel finding needing further examination. The results provide directions for future research and clinical endeavors and support that fear and anxiety are important features associated with hyperalgesia in both men and women.     

A comparison of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls in men and women.

Results from clinical and experimental pain studies provide consistent evidence of sex differences in pain perception, with women reporting more clinical pain and demonstrating lower pain threshold and tolerance levels than men. The present study was designed to assess the notion that sex differences in pain perception may be related to differential activation of supraspinal pain modulation systems. Specifically, the phenomenon of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) was examined in healthy young adult men (n = 39) and women (n = 44) using repeated assessment of nociceptive flexion reflex activity before, during and after exposure to forearm ischemia. Consistent with previous research, women exhibited significantly lower nociceptive flexion reflex thresholds than men, and reported significantly greater pain in response to both forearm ischemia and repeated electrocutaneous stimulation required to elicit the nociceptive flexion reflex. Application of forearm ischemia was associated with a significant decrease in nociceptive flexion reflex activity in both men and women, however, the degree of attenuation of nociceptive flexion reflex activity was not significantly different between the sexes. These findings suggest that men and women exhibit similar activation of diffuse noxious inhibitory controls, but they do not exclude the possibility of sex differences in other forms of central pain modulation.     

Sex-specific effects of pain-related anxiety on adjustment to chronic pain

OBJECTIVE: Considerable research indicates that both high levels of anxiety and female sex are associated with increased sensitivity to experimental pain and greater experience of clinical pain. In general, however, previous research has not investigated the joint effects of sex and anxiety on pain responses. A single previous laboratory-based study indicated that anxiety was inversely related to pain thresholds among men but not among women. The present study examined the relation between pain-related anxiety and adjustment to chronic pain in a sex-dependent manner. DESIGN AND SETTING: A total of 215 (114 women, 101 men) chronic pain patients referred to a multidisciplinary treatment center completed questionnaires assessing anxiety and adjustment to chronic pain. RESULTS: Results generally supported the previous laboratory-based finding indicating that an inverse relation between anxiety and adjustment to chronic pain was present only among male patients. Although male patients with high pain-related anxiety reported greater pain severity, greater interference of pain, and lower levels of daily activity than male patients with low anxiety, this effect was not present among female patients. Moreover, the effects of pain-related anxiety on adjustment to chronic pain were not attributable to either hypervigilance or use of passive coping strategies. Potential explanations and implications for the present findings are discussed.     

Laboratory pain perception and clinical pain in post-menopausal women and age-matched men with osteoarthritis: relationship to pain coping and hormonal status

The present study examined relationships between pain coping, hormone replacement therapy, and laboratory and clinical pain reports in post-menopausal women and age-matched men with osteoarthritis. Assessment of nociceptive flexion reflex threshold was followed by an assessment of electrocutaneous pain threshold and tolerance. Participants rated their arthritis pain using the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. To assess pain coping, participants completed measures of emotion-focused coping, problem-focused coping, and pain catastrophizing. Results indicated that women were more likely than men to report using emotion-focused pain strategies, and that emotion-focused coping was associated with more arthritic pain and lower electrocutaneous pain tolerance. Correlations between coping measures and pain reports revealed that catastrophizing was associated with greater arthritis pain and lower pain threshold and tolerance levels. However, catastrophizing was not related to nociceptive flexion reflex threshold, suggesting that the observed relationship between catastrophizing and subjective pain does not rely on elevated nociceptive input. A comparison of men (n=58), post-menopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy (n=32), and post-menopausal women not receiving hormone replacement therapy (n=42) revealed no significant group differences in arthritis pain, electrocutaneous pain threshold or tolerance, or nociceptive flexion reflex threshold. Thus, older adults with osteoarthritis do not exhibit the pattern of sex differences in response to experimental pain procedures observed in prior studies, possibly due to the development of disease-related changes in pain coping strategies. Accordingly, individual differences in clinical and experimental pain may be better predicted by pain coping than by sex or hormonal differences.     

Systematic Review of Family Functioning in Families of Children and Adolescents With Chronic Pain

Disturbances in family functioning have been identified in youth with chronic pain and are associated with worse child physical and psychological functioning. Assessment measures of family functioning used in research and clinical settings vary. This systematic review summarizes studies investigating relationships among family functioning, pain, and pain-related disability in youth with chronic pain. Sixteen articles were reviewed. All studies were cross-sectional; 7 utilized between-group comparisons (chronic pain versus healthy/control) and 12 examined within-group associations among family functioning, pain, and/or pain-related disability. Studies represented youth with various pain conditions (eg, headache, abdominal pain, fibromyalgia) ages 6 to 20 years. Findings revealed group differences in family functioning between children with chronic pain and healthy control subjects in 5 of 7 studies. Significant associations emerged among family variables and pain-related disability in 6 of 9 studies with worse family functioning associated with greater child disability; relationships between family functioning and children's pain were less consistent. Different patterns of results emerged depending on family functioning measure used. Overall, findings showed that families of children with chronic pain generally have poorer family functioning than healthy populations and that pain-related disability is more consistently related to family functioning than pain intensity.     

Gender differences in outcomes of a multimodal pain management program

Although gender differences in pain and analgesia are well known, it still remains unclear whether men and women vary in response to multimodal pain treatment. This study was conducted to investigate whether men and women exhibited different outcomes after an intensive multimodal pain treatment program. The daily outpatient program consisted of individual treatment as well as group therapy, with a total amount of therapy of 117.5 h per patient. Overall, 496 patients (254 women) completed the multimodal program. Pretreatment parameters for pain, disability due to pain, pain duration, and pain chronicity stage, as well as age or psychiatric comorbidities, did not differ between genders. The average pain, measured with a Numeric Rating Scale, decreased after treatment of −1.54 (±1.96) with a large effect size (ES) of .911 for the total sample. However, there were considerable differences in the benefit for women (−1.83 ± 2.12; ES 1.045) compared with men (−1.23 ± 1.74; ES .758). Consistently, women (ES .694) improved more in pain-related disabilities in daily life than men (ES .436). These distinctions are not due to differences in pain duration, received medication, psychiatric comorbidities, pain chronicity stage, or application for a disability pension. Therefore, gender differences not only refer to chronic pain prevalence, pain perception, or experimental pain measurement, but also seem to have a clinically relevant impact on the response to pain therapy.     

The Interplay of Pain-Related Self-Efficacy and Fear on Functional Outcomes Among Youth With Headache

Pain-related self-efficacy and pain-related fear have been proposed as opposing predictors of pain-related functional outcomes in youth with chronic pain. Self-efficacy is a potential resiliency factor that can mitigate the influence that pain-related fear has on outcomes in youth with chronic pain. Drawing from theoretical assertions tested among adults with chronic pain, this study aimed to determine whether pain-related self-efficacy mediates the adverse influence of pain-related fear on functional outcomes in a sample of youth with chronic headache. In a cross-sectional design of 199 youth with headache, self-efficacy was strongly associated with fear, disability, school impairment, and depressive symptoms. Pain intensity and self-efficacy were only modestly related, indicating that level of pain has less influence on one's confidence functioning with pain. Self-efficacy partially mediated relationships between pain-related fear and both functional disability and school functioning but did not mediate the relationship between pain-related fear and depressive symptoms. These results suggest that confidence in the ability to function despite pain and fear avoidance each uniquely contributes to pain-related outcomes in youth with chronic headache. These results further suggest that treatment for chronic headache in youth must focus not only on decreasing pain-related fear but also on enhancing a patient's pain-related self-efficacy.PerspectivePain-related self-efficacy is an important resiliency factor impacting the influence of pain-related fear on functional disability and school functioning in youth with headache. Enhancing self-efficacy may be a key mechanism for improving behavioral outcomes. Clinicians can reduce pain-related fear and enhance pain-related self-efficacy through interventions that encourage accomplishment and self-confidence.     

Pain and pain-related interference with function in older Canadians: the Canadian study of health and aging

Purpose : The effect that pain has on everyday physical and psychological functioning in the older population is not well understood. The main objective of this study was to describe the extent of pain and pain-related disability in the Canadian population and examine the relationships between demographic and health-related variables and pain-related interference in physical and psychological functioning. Method : The data was obtained from the follow up study to The Canadian Study of Health and Ageing. Information from 5703 Canadians 70 years of age and older was analysed in this study. Results : Fifty-nine point three per cent of the women and 48.4% of the men reported having pain in the 4 weeks prior to the interview. Of those who reported pain, a greater proportion of women compared with men reported that pain at least moderately interfered with physical functioning (moving about, normal tasks, recreational activities, sleep) and psychological functioning (mood, enjoyment of life). The intensity of pain and chronic disease combinations were also shown to be significantly associated with pain-related interference with physical and psychological functioning. Conclusions : A large proportion of older Canadians reports pain and pain-related disability. Thorough pain assessment and management should be incorporated into the health programmes aimed at maximizing physical and psychological function in the older population.     

Pain and pain-related interference with function in older Canadians: the Canadian study of health and aging

Purpose : The effect that pain has on everyday physical and psychological functioning in the older population is not well understood. The main objective of this study was to describe the extent of pain and pain-related disability in the Canadian population and examine the relationships between demographic and health-related variables and pain-related interference in physical and psychological functioning. Method : The data was obtained from the follow up study to The Canadian Study of Health and Ageing. Information from 5703 Canadians 70 years of age and older was analysed in this study. Results : Fifty-nine point three per cent of the women and 48.4% of the men reported having pain in the 4 weeks prior to the interview. Of those who reported pain, a greater proportion of women compared with men reported that pain at least moderately interfered with physical functioning (moving about, normal tasks, recreational activities, sleep) and psychological functioning (mood, enjoyment of life). The intensity of pain and chronic disease combinations were also shown to be significantly associated with pain-related interference with physical and psychological functioning. Conclusions : A large proportion of older Canadians reports pain and pain-related disability. Thorough pain assessment and management should be incorporated into the health programmes aimed at maximizing physical and psychological function in the older population.     

Reduction of pain-related fear in complex regional pain syndrome type I: the application of graded exposure in vivo

Fear of (re)injury/movement has been identified as a potential predictor of chronic disability in complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I). In order to reduce pain-related fears and pain disability, graded exposure in vivo (GEXP) is likely to be an appropriate treatment. Indeed, there is evidence that in chronic pain patients reporting substantial fear of (re)injury/movement, GEXP is successful in reducing pain disability. However, the efficacy of exposure-based protocols in the treatment of CRPS-I patients for reducing pain disability has not been tested. The main research question of this study was whether the reduction of pain-related fear through GEXP also resulted in a decrease of disability in a subgroup of patients with CRPS-I who report substantial pain-related fear. A single-case experimental ABCD-design was used with random determination of the start of the intervention. Eight patients with CRPS-I were included in the study. To assess daily changes in pain intensity, pain-related fear, pain catastrophizing, and activity goal achievement, a diary was used. Standardized questionnaires of pain-related fear, pain disability, and self-reported signs and symptoms of CRPS-I were administered before and after each intervention, and at 6-month follow-up. The current study supports a GEXP approach to chronic CRPS-I. The GEXP was successful in decreasing levels of self-reported pain-related fear, pain intensity, disability, and physiological signs and symptoms. These results support the hypothesis that the meaning people attach to a noxious stimulus influences its experienced painfulness, and that GEXP activates cortical networks and reconciles motor output and sensory feedback.     

The Role of Mood States Underlying Sex Differences in the Perception and Tolerance of Pain

Abstract:   While sex differences in pain reporting are frequently observed, the reasons underlying these differences remain unclear. The present study examined sex differences in self-report and physiological measures of pain threshold and tolerance following the administration of two laboratory pain-induction tasks. The primary study aim centered on determining whether repeated exposure to such tasks would yield sex differences in terms of pain threshold and tolerance. In addition, it was hypothesized that if such differences did exist, negative mood states might account for changes in pain ratings, threshold, and/or tolerance in subsequent exposure to noxious stimuli. Recruited from a convenience sample, 66 participants (44 female and 22 male) were exposed to both thermal and cold noxious stimuli at three separate times, while psychophysiological and self-report data were collected. Because women outnumbered men 2:1, Fisher z transformations were performed to determine whether the observed associations between mood states and pain ratings differed. We found stronger associations between fatigue and thermal-heat pain ratings for men at their first and third exposure to the pain task compared to women ( z  = 2.11, P  < 0.05; z  = 3.14, P  < 0.001, respectively). Results indicated that women evidenced greater pain tolerance than men on both a behavioral and physiological level; however, they reported greater pain severity than men. Fatigue was also found to be particularly important to reports of pain severity in men and pain tolerance in response to noxious stimuli for women. Possible pathways in which mood states influenced these endpoints are discussed.     

Injustice Appraisal,but not Pain Catastrophizing,Mediates the Relationship Between Perceived Ethnic Discrimination and Depression and Disability in Low Back Pain

Despite growing evidence of significant racial disparities in the experience and treatment of chronic pain, the mechanisms by which these disparities manifest have remained relatively understudied. The current study examined the relationship between past experiences of racial discrimination and pain-related outcomes (self-rated disability and depressive symptomatology) and tested the potential mediating roles of pain catastrophizing and perceived injustice related to pain. Analyses consisted of cross-sectional path modeling in a multiracial sample of 137 individuals with chronic low back pain (Hispanics: n = 43; blacks: n = 43; whites: n = 51). Results indicated a positive relationship between prior discriminatory experiences and severity of disability and depressive symptoms. In mediation analyses, pain-related appraisals of injustice, but not pain catastrophizing, were found to mediate these relationships. Notably, the association between discrimination history and perceived injustice was significantly stronger in black and Hispanic participants and was not statistically significant in white participants. The findings suggest that race-based discriminatory experiences may contribute to racial disparities in pain outcomes and highlight the specificity of pain-related, injustice-related appraisals as a mechanism by which these experiences may impair physical and psychosocial function. Future research is needed to investigate temporal and causal mechanisms suggested by the model through longitudinal and clinical intervention studies.PerspectiveMore frequent prior experiences of racial discrimination are associated with greater depressive symptomatology and pain-related disability in individuals with chronic low back pain. These associations are explained by the degree of injustice perception related to pain, but not pain catastrophizing, and were stronger among black and Hispanic participants.     

An Exploratory Analysis of Gender as a Potential Modifier of Treatment Effect Among Patients in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrative Acupuncture and Spinal Manipulation for Low Back Pain

ObjectiveTo identify the potential association of self-reported gender on pain and disability among patients in a randomized controlled trial of integrative acupuncture and spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) for low back pain (LBP).MethodsIn the original study, 100 participants with LBP were randomized to receive acupuncture, SMT, or both combined. Eighty completed treatment and were followed for 60 days. Primary outcome measures were the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and numeric pain scales. This study was a secondary analysis and used regression models to estimate and test for gender-specific differences in outcomes from baseline through end of treatment.ResultsWomen assigned to acupuncture averaged a 3.8-point reduction in highest LBP vs 2.0 points for SMT, whereas men assigned to SMT averaged a 3.5-point reduction vs 1.8 points for acupuncture (P for interaction = .04). There was a trend toward the same for disability (P for interaction = .12). For women, acupuncture alone led to better outcomes without SMT, and for men, SMT alone led to better outcomes without acupuncture. Women who received acupuncture were more likely to experience 50% or greater reductions in disability and pain, whereas men who received SMT were more likely to experience 50% or greater reductions in disability and pain.ConclusionAn association was found between self-reported gender and response to LBP treatment. Women demonstrated a greater reduction in pain and disability with acupuncture and men with SMT. Future clinical trials should consider sex as a potential determinant of treatment outcomes for LBP.     

Sex differences in perceptual and cardiovascular responses to pain: the influence of a perceived ability manipulation

Sex differences in responses to experimental pain have been widely reported, with women typically showing lower pain threshold and tolerance than men. One possible explanation for these differences is that traditional gender roles may lead to sex differences in perceived ability to tolerate pain. To address this possibility, the present study evaluated the influence of a sex-related perceived ability manipulation on pain tolerance and cardiovascular responses to ischemic pain assessed via the submaximal effort tourniquet procedure. A sample of 68 young adults (35 women, 33 men) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 perceived ability conditions, which depicted either women (FEM condition) or men (MASC condition) as more able to tolerate the painful task. The results indicated that men had higher pain tolerance than women. Although there was no overall effect of the experimental condition, only men in the FEM condition had higher tolerance than women. Also, men had greater blood pressure reactivity than women, and further analysis showed that women in the MASC condition had the lowest systolic blood pressure reactivity. Cardiovascular reactivity and motivation to tolerate the pain were positively correlated with pain tolerance only among men in the FEM condition. These findings indicate that the perceived ability manipulation produced only modest effects on pain tolerance and cardiovascular reactivity, but the relationship of cardiovascular and subjective responses to pain tolerance differed across conditions. These findings suggest that perceived ability may contribute to perceptual and cardiovascular responses to pain in a complex fashion, and further research to explicate these relationships is needed.     

Role of gender norms and group identification on hypothetical and experimental pain tolerance

Previous research indicates that men typically tolerate more pain in experimental settings than women. One likely explanation for these group differences in pain tolerance is conformity to traditional, gender group social norms (i.e., the ideal man is masculine and tolerates more pain; the ideal woman is feminine and tolerates less pain). According to self-categorization theory, norms guide behavior to the degree that group members adopt the group identity. Therefore, high-identifying men are expected to conform to gender norms and tolerate more pain than high-identifying women who conform to different gender norms as a guide for their behavior. We conducted two studies to investigate whether gender group identification moderates individuals' conformity to pain tolerance and reporting norms. In the first study, participants indicated their gender identification and expected tolerance of a hypothetical painful stimulus. As anticipated, high-identifying men reported significantly greater pain tolerance than high-identifying women. No differences existed between low-identifying men and women. To determine if self-reported pain tolerance in a role-playing scenario corresponds to actual pain tolerance in an experimental setting, the second study examined pain tolerance to a noxious stimulus induced by electrical stimulation of the index finger. The experimental outcome revealed that high-identifying men tolerated more painful stimulation than high-identifying women. Further, high-identifying men tolerated more pain than low-identifying men. These results highlight the influence of social norms on behavior and suggest the need to further explore the role of norms in pain reporting behaviors.