Multivessel off-pump revascularization in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis: early and midterm outcome analysis

BACKGROUND: The presence of significant left main stenosis (> or =50%) has been considered a relative contraindication to the use of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) stemming from well-documented hemodynamic perturbations during the displacement of the heart. We examined our experience with patients with critical left main stenosis (LMS) to assess the safety and feasibility of OPCAB in this subgroup. METHODS: Our prospectively updated database was queried to identify all patients with severe left main disease who underwent isolated coronary revascularization between January 1, 1999 and May 31, 2002. This query yielded 234 on-pump and 420 off-pump patients with significant LMS whose clinical information was retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The groups were well matched with regard to gender, left ventricular function, surgical priority, and severity of angina. The conventional coronary artery bypass (CABG) group was significantly younger than the OPCAB group and had a higher incidence of a previous myocardial infarction. Patients in the CABG cohort were more likely than OPCAB patients to remain ventilated after 24 hours, require placement of intraoperative or postoperative intraaortic balloon pump, or suffer from postoperative renal failure. There was a decrease in mortality (6.4% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.006) when CPB was eliminated. Intermediate term survival analysis revealed a significant survival benefit in the off-pump group (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel off-pump revascularization in patients with severe left main disease is a safe and effective alternative to conventional bypass grafting and conveys a survival benefit.     

'No touch' techniques for porcelain ascending aorta: comparison between cardiopulmonary bypass with femoral artery cannulation and off-pump myocardial revascularization

BACKGROUND: Detection of severe atherosclerotic ascending aorta during coronary artery bypass grafting requires alterations in the standard surgical technique to reduce the probability of stroke-related atheroembolization. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) confers the benefits of avoiding aortic cannulation and clamping, and may therefore attenuate this risk. METHODS: OPCAB (n = 41) was compared to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) using femoral arterial cannulation and hypothermic fibrillatory arrest (n = 15), in patients with porcelain ascending aorta undergoing myocardial revascularization. In both groups, a 'no touch' technique was applied by avoiding aortic cannulation and clamping. Proximal anastomoses on the atherosclerotic aorta were avoided by arterial grafting, (in-situ or T-graft configurations) in all cases. RESULTS: Operative mortality was comparable (2.4% and 6.6% in the OPCAB and CPB groups respectively, p = NS). The rate of adverse neurological events, (two strokes and one transient ischemic attack), was higher in the CPB group (p = 0.0164). Based on brain CT, the nature of the recorded stroke suggested retrograde emboli. Three year survival (Kaplan-Meier) for the OPCAB and CPB groups was 86.7% and 81.3%, respectively (p = NS). Occurrence of late neurological adverse events during follow-up (8-51 months) was similar. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with porcelain ascending aorta undergoing myocardial revascularization, neurological outcome of OPCAB patients is better than CPB using femoral artery cannulation.     

Comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in midterm results.

OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a procedure of choice for surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Although early advantages of OPCAB were confirmed in comparison with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), late cardiac complications are still controversial. We examined midterm results of OPCAB compared with standard CABG. METHODS: Between July 1997 and April 2002, 736 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG were retrospectively reviewed. The OPCAB group (Group I) comprised 357 patients (49%), and the on-pump CABG group (Group II) 379 patients (51%). Their preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean number of distal anastomoses and the early graft patency were not greatly different between the two groups. The actuarial survival rate at 3 years was not significantly different between Group I (98.3%) and Group II (98.2%) (p = 0.71). The frequency of cardiac events was 4.2%/patient-year in Group I and 2.6%/patient-year in Group II (p = 0.12). The actuarial event free rates were not different between the two groups (p = 0.61). The cardiac event free rates at 3 years were significantly (p = 0.011) higher in patients with complete revascularization (96.7%) than without complete revascularization in Group I (69.2%) and in Group II (92.7% versus 85.9%, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Midterm clinical outcome in OPCAB is as good as conventional on-pump CABG. Incomplete revascularization caused cardiac events more frequently than complete revascularization both in OPCAB and on-pump CABG in the intermediate follow-up.     

Cumulative sum failure analysis of a policy change from on-pump to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: Use of the sequential probability cumulative sum (CUSUM) technique may be more sensitive than standard statistical analyses in detecting a cluster of surgical failures. We applied CUSUM methods to evaluate the learning curve after a policy change by a single surgeon from routine on-pump (cardiopulmonary bypass [CPB]) to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive first-time coronary artery bypass patients (CPB group) were compared with the next 55 patients undergoing an attempt at routine OPCAB using the same coronary stabilizer. The goal in OPCAB patients was to obtain complete revascularization, albeit with a low threshold for conversion to CPB to maximize patient safety during the learning curve. Preoperative patient risk was calculated using previously validated models of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. The occurrence of operative mortality and nine predefined major complications (myocardial infarction, bleeding, stroke, renal failure, balloon pump use, mediastinitis, respiratory failure, life-threatening arrhythmia, and sepsis) was compared between the CPB and OPCAB groups using Wilcoxon, Fisher exact, and two-tailed t tests, as well as CUSUM methodology. An intention to treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: The CPB and OPCAB groups had similar predicted mortality and length of stays (2.2% +/- 2.5%, 8.1 +/- 2.5 days versus 2.4% +/- 3.5%, 8.1 +/- 2.4 days, respectively). The mean number of grafts per patient was 3.1 +/- 0.7 in the CPB group versus 3.0 +/- 0.7 in the OPCAB group (p = 0.45). Two of 55 (3.6%) CPB patients died, as opposed to 1 of 55 (1.8%) OPCAB patients (p = 0.99). Eight of 55 CPB patients (14.5%) incurred major complications, as opposed to 4 of 55 (7.3%) OPCAB patients (p = 0.36). Median hospital length of stay was 6.0 days in the CPB group versus 5.0 days in the OPCAB group (p = 0.28). On CUSUM analysis, the failure curve in CPB patients approached the upper 80% alert line after eight cases, whereas the curve in OPCAB patients reached below the lower 80% (reassurance) boundary 28 cases after the policy change, indicating superior results in the OPCAB group despite the learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: A policy change from coronary artery bypass on CPB to routinely attempting OPCAB can be accomplished safely despite the learning curve. CUSUM analysis was more sensitive than standard statistical methods in detecting a cluster of surgical failures and successes.     

A prospective, randomized study of endothelin and postoperative recovery in off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE: The objectives are 2-fold: (1). to serially determine endothelin (ET) levels in arterial vascular compartments in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery using either cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump techniques, and (2). to define potential relationships between endothelial levels and specific perioperative parameters of patient recovery. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized study, endothelin plasma content was measured from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using either off-pump techniques (OPCAB group, n = 25) or conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB group, n = 25) before surgery, before and after coronary artery anastomosis, and 6 and 24 hours postoperatively. Specific indices of patient recovery including pulmonary artery pressures, ventilation requirement, and hospital stay were documented for patients in both study groups. RESULTS: Postoperative systemic arterial ET levels were significantly increased by 200% in the CPB group and 50% in the OPCAB group. ET levels remained significantly higher in the CPB group relative to the OPCAB group throughout the postoperative period of observation (p < 0.05). Pulmonary artery pressures, ventilation requirement, and hospital stay were significantly increased in patients in the CPB group. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative ET levels were higher in patients who underwent CPB for coronary artery bypass surgery. Increased ET in the postoperative period may contribute to a more complex recovery from coronary artery bypass surgery in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly patient is associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. The avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in this population is potentially beneficial. We examined our initial experience with off-pump multivessel coronary artery revascularization in patients aged 70 years and older. METHODS: In a consecutive series of 300 off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) operations performed by a single surgeon between 1996 and 1999, 98 patients were aged 70 years and older. These patients were compared with a consecutive cohort of 497 patients aged 70 years and older operated on with CPB in the same institution from 1995 to 1996, period where OPCAB surgery was not performed in our institution. RESULTS: Patients in the beating heart group were older (75+/-4 vs. 74+/-3 years; P=0.001). Gender distribution and other preoperative risk factors were comparable for the two groups. On average, 3.0+/-0.8 and 2.8+/-0.7 grafts per patient were completed in the OPCAB and the CPB groups, respectively (P=0.007). Perioperative mortality rates (OPCAB group, 3.1%; CPB group, 3.6%), perioperative myocardial infarction (OPCAB, 2.0%; CPB, 5.1%) and neurologic events (OPCAB, 1.0%; CPB, 3.2%) were comparable for the two groups. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was lower in the OPCAB group (42 vs. 54%; P=0.05). The need for allogenic blood transfusions was significantly less in the OPCAB group (53 vs. 82%; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients aged 70 years and older, multivessel OPCAB surgery is associated with lower rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation and reduced transfusion requirements. Multivessel OPCAB in the elderly patient is an acceptable alternative to procedures performed with CPB.     

Nonthyroidal illness syndrome in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is an established cause of nonthyroidal illness syndrome (NTIS). Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) has been reported to be less invasive than coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with CPB. We prospectively evaluated thyroid metabolism in OPCAB patients. METHODS: We analyzed free thyroid hormones (FT3 and FT4), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and reverse T3 (rT3) in 20 consecutive patients undergoing CABG surgery. Nine patients underwent CABG with CPB, and 11 underwent OPCAB. Blood samples were taken on admission, on the day of surgery (7:30 AM), after sternotomy, at the end of the operation, and at 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 144 hours postoperatively. The concentrations of FT3, FT4, and TSH were determined on each sample. Reverse T3 concentration was measured in 10 patients up to 48 hours and at 144 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Baseline, operative, and postoperative variables were similar in the two groups. FT3 concentration dropped significantly (p < 0.0001), reaching its lowest value 12 hours postoperatively. There were no significant differences between CPB and OPCAB patients. FT4 varied significantly in both groups (p < 0.0001), but remained in the normal range. TSH variation was not significant. rT3 concentration rose significantly (p = 0.0002) in both groups, peaking 24 hours after surgery. CONCLUSIONS. OPCAB induces a NTIS similar to that observed after CPB, probably due to the inhibition of T4 conversion to T3. This finding suggests that NTIS is a nonspecific response to stress. CPB should not be considered as the sole trigger of NTIS in cardiac surgical patients.     

Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery improve the outcome in high-risk patients?: a comparative study of 1398 high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE: Although there has been some evidence supporting the theoretical and practical advantages of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) over the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), it has not yet been determined which group of patients would benefit most from it. It has been advocated recently that high-risk patients could benefit most from avoidance of CPB. The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the efficacy of the OPCAB technique in multi-vessel myocardial revascularization in a large series of high-risk patients. METHODS: The records of 1398 consecutive high-risk patients who underwent primary isolated CABG at Harefield Hospital between August 1996 and December 2001 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were considered as high-risk and included in the study if they had a preoperative EuroSCORE of > or =5. Two hundred and eighty-six patients were operated on using the OPCAB technique while 1112 patients were operated on using the conventional CABG technique with CPB. The OPCAB patients were significantly older than the CPB patients (68.1+/-8.3 vs. 63.7+/-9.9 years, respectively, P<0.001). The OPCAB group included significantly more patients with poor left ventricular (LV) function (ejection fraction (EF) < or =30%) (P<0.001) and more patients with renal problems (P<0.001). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of grafts between the groups. The CPB patients received 2.8+/-1.2 grafts per patient while OPCAB patients received 2.8+/-0.5 grafts per patient (P=1). Twenty-one (7.3%) OPCAB patients had one or more major complications, while 158 (14.2%) CPB patients (P=0.008) developed major complications. Thirty-eight (3.4%) CPB patients developed peri-operative myocardial infarction (MI) while only two (0.7%) OPCAB patients developed peri-operative MI (P=0.024). The intensive therapy unit (ITU) stay for OPCAB patients was 29.3+/-15.4 h while for CPB patients it was 63.6+/-167.1 h (P<0.001). There were ten (3.5%) deaths in the OPCAB patients compared to 78 (7%) deaths in the CPB patients (P=0.041) within 30 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study shows that using the OPCAB technique for multi-vessel myocardial revascularization in high-risk patients significantly reduces the incidence of peri-operative MI and other major complications, ITU stay and mortality. Even though the OPCAB group included a significantly higher proportion of older patients with poor LV function (EF < or =30%) and renal problems, the beneficial effect of OPCAB was evident.     

Comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in midterm results

Objective: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a procedure of choice for surgical treatment of coronary artery disease. Although early advantages of OPCAB were confirmed in comparison with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), late cardiac complications are still controversial. We examined midterm results of OPCAB compared with standard CABG. Methods: Between July 1997 and April 2002, 736 consecutive patients who underwent isolated CABG were retrospectively reviewed. The OPCAB group (Group I) comprised 357 patients (49%), and the on-pump CABG group (Group II) 379 patients (51%). Their preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. Results: The mean number of distal anastomoses and the early graft patency were not greatly different between the two groups. The actuarial survival rate at 3 years was not significantly different between Group I (98.3%) and Group II (98.2%) (p=0.71). The frequency of cardiac events was 4.2%/patient-year in Group I and 2.6%/patient-year in Group II (p=0.12). The actuarial event free rates were not different between the two groups (p=0.61). The cardiac event free rates at 3 years were significantly (p=0.011) higher in patients with complete revascularization (96.7%) than without complete revascularization in Group I (69.2%) and in Group II (92.7% versus 85.9%, p=0.026). Conclusions: Midterm clinical outcome in OPCAB is as good as conventional on-pump CABG. Incomplete revascularization caused cardiac events more frequently than complete revascularization both in OPCAB and on-pump CABG in the intermediate follow-up.     

Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass is gaining popularity as an alternative to conventional on-pump technique for myocardial revascularization. This includes minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and full sternotomy off-pump (OPCAB) methods. These two approaches should be evaluated for financial and clinical appropriateness. METHODS: Records of patients who had single or double bypass (internal mammary artery and/or saphenous vein) grafts between January 1997 and June 1998 were reviewed. These included 44 MIDCAB, 62 OPCAB, and 243 conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB) patients. Univariate analysis was applied to pre, intra, and postoperative variables, comparing MIDCAB and OPCAB to the CCAB group. Procedural cost information was obtained from participating institutions. RESULTS: MIDCAB patients compared to CCAB patients had a higher predicted risk (5.4+/-11 versus 2.3+/-2.8, p = 0.012) and OPCAB patients had a predicted risk of 5.3+/-7.8. MIDCAB and OPCAB procedures required less operating room time and blood utilization. Observed operative mortality rates were MIDCAB 4.5%, OPCAB 1.6%, and CCAB 2.8% (not significant). Mean hospital costs were CCAB at $19,000, OPCAB at $15,000, and $17,000 for MIDCAB. CONCLUSIONS: Off pump procedures currently reflect acute episode-of-care cost savings over CCAB.     

Application of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency surgery.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has become a more applicable procedure, even in patients with multi-vessel disease. However, the role of OPCAB for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring emergency revascularization has not been established yet. We reviewed our results of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with ACS. Seventy-two patients with ACS who underwent emergency CABG were studied. Twenty-five underwent OPCAB and 47 on-pump CABG. OPCAB was mainly indicated for patients who were possibly at risk for cardiopulmonary bypass. When the coronary anatomy was suitable in younger or less risky patients, OPCAB was performed. Patients with multi-vessel disease or with a critical left main trunk lesion were not excluded from OPCAB. The mean number of grafted vessels was 2.6 per patient in the OPCAB group, and 3.8 per patient in the on-pump group (p<0.0001). However, none of the patients in either group required postoperative catheter intervention. Mean operative time was 195 minutes in the OPCAB group and 286 minutes in the on-pump group (p<0.0001). There were three postoperative deaths in the OPCAB group and four in the on-pump group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative cardiogenic shock was the only significant predictor for postoperative death (odds ratio, 7.33). The selection of the on-pump procedure or OPCAB did not correlate with operative death. Thus, we conclude that OPCAB can be performed safely and effectively in selected patients with ACS requiring emergency coronary revascularization.     

Midterm outcomes of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery revascularization in renal transplant recipients

Abstract Objectives: Renal transplant recipients have high mortality from cardiac causes and are frequently in need of coronary interventions. Surgical coronary revascularization is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in this patient population. This study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes of on‐pump versus off‐pump revascularization in renal transplant recipients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 43 renal transplant recipients who underwent surgical coronary revascularization with functioning allografts. Revascularization was performed on‐pump [coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] in 21 patients and off‐pump [off‐pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB)] in 22 patients. Results: Preoperative characteristics did not differ between the two groups except for age and incidence of prior sternotomy. Total operative time and transfusion requirements were similar. The on‐pump group received a higher number of bypass grafts (p = 0.03). Overall 30‐day, one‐year, five‐year, and eight‐year survival was 90%, 76%, 61%, and 32% for CABG group, and 95%, 86%, 62%, and 48% for OPCAB group (p = 0.53). The postoperative peak creatinine was higher in the CABG patients than in OPCAB patients (p = 0.04). At discharge, there was no difference in mean creatinine between the two groups. The rate of return to permanent dialysis after revascularization was similar (28% for CABG and 22% for OPCAB, p = 0.73). There was no difference in dialysis‐free survival up to eight‐years postrevascularization (p = 0.63). Conclusions: Despite higher mortality risk, surgical coronary revascularization can be performed safely in renal transplant recipients. OPCAB resulted in no improvement in patient survival or renal allograft function compared to on‐pump revascularization. (J Card Surg 2011;26:591‐595)     

Stroke after conventional versus minimally invasive coronary artery bypass

BACKGROUND: Postoperative stroke is a serious complication after coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump), and portends higher morbidity and mortality. It is unknown whether an off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass (OPCAB) approach may yield a lower stroke rate over conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: From June 1994 to December 2000, OPCAB was performed in 2,320 patients and compared with 8,069 patients who had on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, during the same period of time. The patients undergoing OPCAB were randomly matched to on-pump patients by propensity score. A logistic regression model was used to test the difference in the postoperative stroke rate between OPCAB and on-pump procedures controlling for the correlation between matched sets. A multiple logistic regression model predicting the risk of stroke adjusted by stroke risk factors and operation type was also computed. RESULTS: Matches by propensity score were found for 72% of the patients undergoing OPCAB. Patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were 1.8 (95% confidence interval 1.0 to 3.1, p = 0.03) times more likely to suffer a stroke postoperatively than OPCAB patients after controlling for preoperative risk factors through matching. Independent predictors of stroke identified from the multiple logistic model included on-pump operation (versus OPCAB operation), female gender, 4 to 6 vessels grafted (versus <4 grafts), hypertension, history of previous cerebrovascular accident, carotid artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and depressed ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass avoids the risks of cardiopulmonary bypass and atrial trauma. A substantially lower stroke rate suggests that OPCAB is a neurologically safe treatment option for revascularization.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting/beating coronary artery bypass grafting for a patient with low left ventricular ejection fraction

Beating coronary artery bypass grafting could be performed for a 47-year-old man with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 9.3%. Post-operative LVEF was improved to 51.6%. Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) used to be contraindicative for patients with LVEF below 20%. Recently, such patients are involved to indication of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) or beating CABG, because we consider OPCAB are lower complications than conventional CABG. We were able to bypass the circumflex for the patient while we had been used percutaneous cardio-pulmonary support (PCPS). We could perform beating coronary artery bypass grafting for a patient of the low LVEF.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A single center experience

Background Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is gaining popularity as an effective alternative to conventional CABG using cardiopulmonary bypass. With the advent of mechanical tissue stabilization systems and intra coronary shunts the technique of off-pump CABG (OPCAB) is now applicable to revascularize the patients with multi-vessel disease. Methods A total of 293 patients underwent surgical myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass between July 1996 and October 2000 at our hospital. Of these, 245 patients received 2 or more grafts: two in 193 patients, 3 in 46 patients and 4 in 7 patients. A mechnical tissue stabilization system (CTS or Octopus II/III) was used in all patients. In majority of the patients intra coronary shunts were also used. A total of 550 distal anastomoses were made and the vessels grafted were LAD (n=245), diagonal (n=90), ramus intermedius (n=16), obtuse marginal branches (n=58), distal right coronary artery (n=88) and posterior descending artery (n=52). Results There was no incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction. Three patients had transient ST segment elevation postoperatively which was normalized in the first few hours. Hospital mortality was 0.4%. No patient needed reexploration for bleeding. No patient had neurological event or pulmonary problems. All these patients except one were discharged from the hospital between 6 and 9 days. Conclusion In selected patients multi vessel OPCAB is a safe and reproducible technique and the mechanical tissue stabilization systems have made the procedure less difficult to perform. Its usefulness is more pronounced in high risk patients with comorbidities and the patients who undergo this procedure are free from major complications.     

‘No Touch’ Techniques for Porcelain Ascending Aorta: Comparison Between Cardiopulmonary Bypass with Femoral Artery Cannulation and Off‐Pump Myocardial Revascularization

Abstract Background: Detection of severe atherosclerotic ascending aorta during coronary artery bypass grafting requires alterations in the standard surgical technique to reduce the probability of stroke‐related atheroembolization. Off‐pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) confers the benefits of avoiding aortic cannulation and clamping, and may therefore attenuate this risk. Methods: OPCAB (n # 41) was compared to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) using femoral arterial cannulation and hypothermic fibrillatory arrest (n = 15), in patients with porcelain ascending aorta undergoing myocardial revascularization. In both groups, a ‘no touchrsquo; technique was applied by avoiding aortic cannulation and clamping. Proximal anastomoses on the atherosclerotic aorta were avoided by arterial grafting, (in‐situ or T‐graft configurations) in all cases. Results: Operative mortality was comparable (2.4% and 6.6% in the OPCAB and CPB groups respectively, p # NS). The rate of adverse neurological events, (two strokes and one transient ischemic attack), was higher in the CPB group (p # 0.0164). Based on brain CT, the nature of the recorded stroke suggested retrograde emboli. Three year survival (Kaplan‐Meier) for the OPCAB and CPB groups was 86.7% and 81.3%, respectively (p = NS). Occurrence of late neurological adverse events during follow‐up (8–51 months) was similar. Conclusions: In patients with porcelain ascending aorta undergoing myocardial revascularization, neurological outcome of OPCAB patients is better than CPB using femoral artery cannulation.     

Coronary artery bypass in patients 80 years and over: is off-pump the operation of choice?

BACKGROUND: Octogenarians are at increased risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass. In this study we compared our experience with patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass (CAB) and those undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) to assess outcomes. METHODS: We used hospital database analysis in patients 80 years and older who underwent nonemergent coronary artery bypass with (N = 169) and without (N = 60) cardiopulmonary bypass from January 1999 through June 2001. RESULTS: Both groups were at increased perioperative risk based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model (7.7% OPCAB vs 5.8% CAB, p = 0.03). There were no operative deaths in the OPCAB group but there were eight (4.7%) in the CAB group (p = NS). Perioperative stroke (0% OPCAB vs 7.1% CAB, p = 0.04), prolonged ventilation (1.7% OPCAB vs 11.8% CAB, p = 0.02), and transfusion rate (33% OPCAB vs 70.4% CAB, p < 0.001) were all lower in the OPCAB group. A shorter hospital stay (6.3 days OPCAB vs 11.5 days CAB, p < 0.001) resulted in lower hospital cost in the OPCAB group ($9,363 OPCAB vs $12,312 CAB, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients was associated with fewer complications, a shorter hospital stay, and lower hospital cost. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting may be the operation of choice for octogenarians requiring surgical myocardial revascularization.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery technique for total arterial myocardial revascularization: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery should be the procedure of choice in total arterial myocardial revascularization with composite grafts. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 176 patients undergoing total arterial myocardial revascularization and assigned them at random to one of two groups: group 1 was composed of 88 patients undergoing coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); group 2 consisted of 88 patients receiving the OPCAB procedure. We excluded from this study patients with significant risk factors for CPB-related morbidity. Composite arterial grafts in Y-T shape were realized in three different configurations according to patients' characteristics, coronary anatomy, and target stenosis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative characteristics and risk factors (Euroscore: group 1 = 6.1 +/- 3.5, group 2 = 6.6 +/- 3.8). Mean number of anastomoses was similar in both groups (group 1 = 2.8 +/- 0.8, group 2 = 2.7 +/- 0.5) whereas mean mechanical ventilation time (group 1 = 23 +/- 9 hours, group 2 = 9 +/- 4 hours), intensive care unit stay (group 1 = 43 +/- 6 hours, group 2 = 22 +/- 8 hours), and postoperative stay (group 1 = 7 +/- 3 days, group 2 = 5 +/- 2 days) were significantly reduced in group 2. Early mortality was 2.3% in group 1 and 3.4% in group 2 (p = not significant). Major postoperative complications occurred similarly in the two groups (atrial fibrillation: group 1 = 35.2%, group 2 = 21.6%; myocardial infarction: group 1 = 2.2%, group 2 = 1.1%; stroke: group 1 = 2.2%, group 2 = 0%; abdominal infarction: group 1 = 3.4%, group 2 = 0%). At follow-up (mean, 15 +/- 12 months) no significant differences were observed in terms of survival free of any cardiac-related event (group 1 = 94.3%, group 2 = 96.5%; p = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery surgery could be successfully used for total arterial grafting without compromising the completeness of revascularization. Avoidance of CPB significantly decreased mechanical ventilation support and length of intensive care unit and postoperative stay; however in the absence of risk factors for cardiopulmonary bypass, off-pump coronary artery surgery did not improve early and midterm clinical outcome.     

Influence of diabetes on mortality and morbidity: off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND: Myocardial revascularization in diabetic patients is challenging with no established optimum treatment strategy. We reviewed our coronary artery bypass grafting experience to determine the impact of eliminating cardiopulmonary bypass on outcomes in diabetic patients relative to nondiabetic patients. METHODS: From January 1995 through December 1999, 9,965 patients, of whom 2,891 (29%) had diabetes, underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Diabetic and nondiabetic patients were further divided into groups on the basis of cardiopulmonary bypass use. Twelve percent (346 of 2,891) of diabetic patients and 12% (829 of 7,074) of nondiabetic patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass; the remainder had coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. Nineteen preoperative variables were compared among treatment groups by univariate analysis. RESULTS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass compared with those having coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass had higher mean predicted mortalities (diabetic, 3.96% versus 3.72%, p = 0.83; nondiabetic, 3.03% versus 2.86%, p = 0.79). In nondiabetic patients, coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass provides an actual and risk-adjusted survival advantage over coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (1.81% versus 3.44%, p = 0.0127; risk-adjusted mortality, 1.79% versus 3.61%, p = 0.007). This survival benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass was not seen in diabetic patients (2.89% versus 3.69%, p = 0.452; risk-adjusted mortality, 2.19% versus 2.98%, p = 0.42). Diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass had fewer complications, including decreased blood product use (34.39% versus 58.4%, p = 0.001), and reduced incidence of prolonged ventilation (6.94% versus 12.10%, p = 0.005), atrial fibrillation (15.90% versus 23.26%, p = 0.002), and renal failure requiring dialysis (0.87% versus 2.75%, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The survival advantage in nondiabetic patients treated with coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass is not apparent in diabetic patients. Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass in diabetic patients is nevertheless associated with a significant reduction in morbidity.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass versus off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass grafting: does eliminating the pump reduce morbidity and cost?

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to the complications and cost of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Off-pump CABG (OPCAB) allows coronary revascularization without CPB. We hypothesized that OPCAB provides satisfactory graft patency while reducing complications and cost compared with CABG with CPB. METHODS: We prospectively followed 80 patients undergoing CABG: 40 patients undergoing OPCAB and 40 patients undergoing CABG with CPB. OPCAB patients underwent angiography within 48 hours of surgery to determine early graft patency. Incidence of complications, length of stay, and costs were recorded for each patient. The influence of the number of vessels bypassed was analyzed. RESULTS: OPCAB patients (n = 40) underwent grafting of 2.7 +/- 0.7 vessels per patient compared with 3.6 +/- 0.8 vessels per patient in the CABG with CPB group (n = 40) (p < 0.0001). Angiography demonstrated 105 of 108 (97%) of grafts were patent in the OPCAB group. Incidence of complications, length of stay, and costs did not differ between the OPCAB and CABG with CPB groups. Number of vessels grafted showed a positive correlation to total costs in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: While OPCAB provided satisfactory early graft patency, there was no significant difference between OPCAB and CABG with CPB with regard to cost, length of stay, or incidence of complications. In this study, eliminating CPB did not reduce morbidity or cost after CABG.