Effect of acupressure by Sea-Bands on nausea and vomiting of pregnancy

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of continuous acupressure at P6 applied by Sea-Bands with acupressure buttons on the frequency and severity of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy during the 1 st trimester. DESIGN: A two-group, quasi-experimental, posttest-only and posttest-repeated measure. SETTING: Seventeen medical clinics or offices in southern Michigan. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of English-speaking, healthy pregnant women in their 1 st trimester, who had at least one episode of nausea, vomiting, or both before their prenatal clinic/office visit where they were recruited. After being accepted for the study, the women were randomly assigned to treatment or placebo groups. INTERVENTION: Treatment group 1 applied SeaBands with acupressure buttons to both wrists for 4 days and removed the Sea-Bands for 3 subsequent days. Placebo group 2 applied the Sea-Bands without acupressure buttons to both wrists on the same time schedule as group 1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-report daily diaries of the number of times per day that participants experienced nausea, the severity of nausea, the number of vomiting episodes per day, and the severity of vomiting. RESULTS: Mann-Whitney U procedures revealed that the treatment group had significantly less frequency and severity of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy while wearing the Sea-Bands than did the placebo group. The treatment group also had significantly less frequency and severity of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy while wearing the SeaBands than when not wearing the Sea-Bands. CONCLUSIONS: Sea-Bands with acupressure buttons are a noninvasive, inexpensive, safe, and effective treatment for the nausea and vomiting of pregnancy.     

Ginger for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of ginger for the treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. METHODS: Women with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy, who first attended an antenatal clinic at or before 17 weeks' gestation, were invited to participate in the study. During a 5-month period, 70 eligible women gave consent and were randomized in a double-masked design to receive either oral ginger 1 g per day or an identical placebo for 4 days. Subjects graded the severity of their nausea using visual analog scales and recorded the number of vomiting episodes in the previous 24 hours before treatment, and again during 4 consecutive days while taking treatment. At a follow-up visit 7 days later, five-item Likert scales were used to assess the severity of their symptoms. RESULTS: All participants except three in the placebo group remained in the study. The visual analog scores of posttherapy minus baseline nausea decreased significantly in the ginger group (2.1 +/- 1.9) compared with the placebo group (0.9 +/- 2.2, P =.014). The number of vomiting episodes also decreased significantly in the ginger group (1.4 +/- 1.3) compared with the placebo group (0.3 +/- 1.1, P <.001). Likert scales showed that 28 of 32 in the ginger group had improvement in nausea symptoms compared with 10 of 35 in the placebo group (P <.001). No adverse effect of ginger on pregnancy outcome was detected. CONCLUSION: Ginger is effective for relieving the severity of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy.     

Nausea and Vomiting During Pregnancy: Effects on the Quality of Women's Lives

ABSTRACT: More than 70 percent of all pregnant women experience nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, and 28 percent report that symptoms cause them to change their usual activities. We investigated the magnitude of problems that nausea and vomiting impose on the lifestyle of pregnant women and their families. Twenty-seven women who were experiencing different degrees of nausea and vomiting were selected from 147 pregnant women and asked to participate in semistructured telephone interviews. All participants reported changes in family, social, or occupational functioning as a result of these symptoms. Nausea and vomiting can impose substantial lifestyle limitations on pregnant women that can have short- and long-term consequences for them and their families. Both the duration and severity of symptoms were greater for many participants than is generally believed. All participants reported that recumbent rest or dietary alterations provided relief. Caregivers should recognize and validate the need for pregnant women to make changes in lifestyle that will enable them to achieve comfort.     

Severity of Nausea and Vomiting During Pregnancy: What Does It Predict?

Background: Relationships between the severity of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy and selected demographic (employment status, parity, age, smoking) and pregnancy outcome (birthweight, gender) variables are described. Methods: Women who volunteered for a community-based clinical trial were eligible for inclusion in this study. On three occasions, 12 hours apart, during early pregnancy using a continuous measure of nausea, vomiting, and retching, women assessed the amount, duration, and severity of symptoms as they occurred. After the birth of their infants, they provided information about the duration of nausea, vomiting, and retching as well pregnancy outcome information by responding to a mailed questionnaire. Multivariate methods were used to analyze data. Results: More severe vomiting in early pregnancy was likely to continue for a longer period of time and was related to decreased infant birthweight. Gestational age, parity status, and severity of vomiting were predictors of infant birthweight and together explained 22 percent of the variance in birthweight. A significant relationship between fetal gender and severity of nausea and vomiting was not found. Conclusions: It may be possible to identify women at risk for third trimester vomiting and to provide appropriate nutritional support and counseling so that their risk of having a low-birthweight infant is reduced. A larger sample would be required to assess the relationship between fetal gender and severity of nausea, vomiting, and retching.     

Comparing ginger and vitamin B6 for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial

Objective

to compare the effectiveness of ginger and vitamin B6 for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy.

Methods

double-blind randomised controlled trial. Pregnant women with nausea, who first attended the antenatal clinic at or before 17 weeks gestation, were invited to participate in the study. Over a 3-month period, 70 women were randomised to receive either ginger 1 g/day or vitamin B6 40 mg/day for 4 days. Subjects graded the severity of their nausea using a visual analogue scale, and recorded the number of vomiting episodes in the 24 hours before treatment and during 4 consecutive days while taking treatment. At 7-day follow-up, women reported any changes in the severity of their symptoms.

Results

compared with baseline, the decrease in the visual analogue scores of post-therapy nausea in the ginger group was significantly greater than that for the vitamin B6 group (p=0.024). The number of vomiting episodes decreased in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the groups. In the ginger group, 29/35 women reported an improvement in nausea symptoms, compared with 23/34 women in the vitamin B6 group (p=0.52).

Conclusion

ginger is more effective than vitamin B6 for relieving the severity of nausea, and is equally effective for decreasing the number of vomiting episodes in early pregnancy.     

Psychosocial morbidity among women with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: prevalence and association with anti-emetic therapy

Unlike severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP), it is not known whether milder forms of NVP have been associated with psychosocial morbidity. We undertook the study to explore the prevalence of psychosocial morbidity by severity of NVP, and determine whether, after correction for severity of nausea/vomiting, there is a relationship between psychosocial morbidity and women's decisions to take anti-emetics as a reflection of their distress due to NVP. From 1996-97, an NVP Healthline was advertised. Callers underwent semi-structured interviews about both their NVP and associated psychosocial morbidity in a previous pregnancy. Most of the 3201 callers resided in Canada, worked outside the home, reported on planned pregnancy (a median of) 4 years before, and described severe (> 5 episodes/day of) nausea and vomiting. More severe nausea/vomiting was associated with more frequent feelings of depression, consideration of termination of pregnancy, adverse effects on women's relationships with their partners or their partners' everyday lives, and the perceived likelihood that NVP would harm their baby (p < 0.0001). However, all psychosocial factors were reported by a clinically important proportion of women with mild nausea/vomiting (0-1 episodes/day). The severity of vomiting was most closely related to women's decisions to take anti-emetics, but other psychosocial factors were also independently associated with anti-emetic therapy. We conclude that psychosocial morbidity is evident across the spectrum of severity of nausea and vomiting among women with NVP. The severity of nausea or vomiting does not appear adequately to reflect the distress caused by NVP, as reflected by women's decisions to take anti-emetic therapy.     

A comparison of different severities of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy relative to stress, social support, and maternal adaptation

A cross-sectional and comparative research design with convenience sampling was used to recruit pregnant women from prenatal clinics in southern Taiwan between 2002 and 2003 to examine the differences in perceived stress, social support, and maternal psychosocial adaptation among women with different severities (mild or less than mild, moderate, and severe) of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. A total of 150 pregnant women participated in this study. One-way analysis of variance indicated that perceived stress was significantly different among the 3 groups. The least significant difference post-hoc test revealed that pregnant women with mild nausea and vomiting had significantly lower stress than did pregnant women with severe nausea and vomiting. The severity of nausea and vomiting was significantly associated with the Prenatal Self Evaluation Questionnaire subscales for "acceptance of pregnancy" and "fear of helplessness and loss of control in labor." Social support and maternal psychosocial adaptation were not significantly different among these three groups. The degree of perceived stress and maternal psychosocial adaptation may be related to the severity of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy.     

Recall bias of the symptoms of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy

OBJECTIVE: Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy is the most common medical condition in pregnancy. Relatively little research has been conducted on this condition, and much of it is based on women's reports. Determinants that affect women's reports of their nausea and vomiting of pregnancy symptoms have not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of recall by women of their symptoms of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred women who called the Motherisk nausea and vomiting of pregnancy counseling line in Toronto were asked about the severity of their nausea and vomiting of pregnancy symptoms with the use of the pregnancy unique quantification of emesis and nausea system (PUQE). The patients were asked the same questions again during a follow-up call, which took place up to 16 weeks later. RESULTS: There was a recall (or reporting) bias for nausea and vomiting, with women reporting significantly more severe symptoms during their follow-up call than they had reported originally. Multivariate analysis revealed that the severity of the symptoms affected the accuracy of recall positively, whereas the time that has elapsed affected it negatively. CONCLUSION: Retrospective evaluation of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy symptoms may produce a recall bias, which may distort the evaluation of the therapeutic effectiveness of antiemetics.     

Variables Related to Nausea and Vomiting During Pregnancy

ABSTRACT: Seventy to 90 percent of all pregnant women experience nausea, and 50 percent have at least one episode of vomiting or retching. A continuous measure was used to quantify symptoms of nausea with or without vomiting or retching during pregnancy in 126 women. Relationships between symptoms and selected variables were evaluated. Nausea with or without vomiting or retching was associated with maternal age, occupation, parity, cigarette smoking, infant gender and the personality trait of independence. Significant associations were entered into multiple regression equations. Fourteen percent of the variation in symptoms overall, 25.1 percent of the variation in nausea symptoms, and 16.6 percent of the variation in vomiting or retching symptoms were explained by a combination of these selected independent variables. Although this study found associations, independent variables contributed little to predicting or explaining the presence and severity of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. More sensitive measures and evaluation are required to understand and treat this perplexing phenomenon.     

Psychosocial morbidity among women with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: Prevalence and association with anti-emetic therapy

Unlike severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP), it is not known whether milder forms of NVP have been associated with psychosocial morbidity. We undertook the study to explore the prevalence of psychosocial morbidity by severity of NVP, and determine whether, after correction for severity of nausea/ vomiting, there is a relationship between psychosocial morbidity and women's decisions to take anti-emetics as a reflection of their distress due to NVP. From 1996–97, an NVP Healthline was advertised. Callers underwent semi-structured interviews about both their NVP and associated psychosocial morbidity in a previous pregnancy. Most of the 3201 callers resided in Canada, worked outside the home, reported on planned pregnancy (a median of) 4 years before, and described severe (> 5 episodes/day of) nausea and vomiting. More severe nausea/vomiting was associated with more frequent feelings of depression, consideration of termination of pregnancy, adverse effects on women's relationships with their partners or their partners' everyday lives, and the perceived likelihood that NVP would harm their baby (p < 0.0001). However, all psychosocial factors were reported by a clinically important proportion of women with mild nausea/vomiting (0–1 episodes/day). The severity of vomiting was most closely related to women's decisions to take anti-emetics, but other psychosocial factors were also independently associated with anti-emetic therapy.

We conclude that psychosocial morbidity is evident across the spectrum of severity of nausea and vomiting among women with NVP. The severity of nausea or vomiting does not appear adequately to reflect the distress caused by NVP, as reflected by women's decisions to take anti-emetic therapy.     

Infant Formula Distribution and Advertising in Pregnancy: A Hospital Survey

ABSTRACT: A survey was conducted at a 526–bed community hospital in Rochester, New York, to determine the prevalence of formula advertising and distribution during pregnancy to 136 consecutive intrapartum patients. Women answered a questionnaire about their choice of infant feeding methods and prenatal exposure to formula advertising. Of those who received printed information on infant feeding, 78 percent reported that it was published by a formula company, and 65 percent recalled receiving offers for free formula during their pregnancy. The likelihood of having received such offers was the same in women who planned to breastfeed as in those who planned to formula feed. Thirty-eight percent of women obtained formula through a free offer before their infant's birth. Women who were privately cared for were more likely to have received offers for free formula (p < 0.001) than were women cared for in hospital-affiliated clinics. Ninety percent of women who received free formula prenatally reported their prenatal caregiver as a source of samples. Of samples that women obtained prenatally, 93 percent were from companies that advertise only indirectly through hospitals and physicians, whereas 7 percent were from companies that advertise directly to patients. The prevalence of formula company advertising during the prenatal care of women who to deliver in this hospital is high. The continued participation of prenatal caregivers in promotion efforts of formula companies provides a negative or mixed message about the importance of breastfeeding and may be a barrier to its success.     

EVALUATION OF A REDUCED-FREQUENCY PRENATAL VISIT SCHEDULE FOR LOW-RISK WOMEN AT A FREE-STANDING BIRTHING CENTER

Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of a reduced-frequency prenatal visit schedule by comparing perinatal outcomes, anxiety and maternal satisfaction with prenatal care. Methods: pregnancy outcomes of infant and maternal morbidity and mortality, anxiety and satisfaction for 81 women receiving prenatal care at a free-standing birthing center according to either an alternative prenatal care visit schedule (APCVS) (n = 43) or the traditional prenatal care visit schedule (TPCVS) (n = 38) were examined in this prospective randomized study. Upon entry into prenatal care, all women were of low obstetrical risk status. Results: major findings revealed no significant differences in selected perinatal outcomes between the two study groups. Women in the APCVS group reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction than women in the TPCVS group on both the satisfaction with provider subscale (F = 5.74, P = .02) and the satisfaction with the prenatal care system subscale (F = 2.01, P = .04). There were no statistically significant differences found in anxiety scores between women in the two study groups. Conclusions: low-risk women who followed the reduced-frequency visit schedule experienced no difference in perinatal outcomes or anxiety. Women in the reduced-frequency (APCVS) group reported an increased level of satisfaction with both provider and the prenatal care system.     

Reprint of: Survey of medicinal cannabis use among childbearing women: Patterns of its use in pregnancy and retroactive self-assessment of its efficacy against ‘morning sickness’

A majority of women experience some nausea and/or vomiting during pregnancy. This condition can range from mild nausea to extreme nausea and vomiting, with 1–2% of women suffering from the life-threatening condition hyperemesis gravidarum. Cannabis (Cannabis sativa) may be used therapeutically to mitigate pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting. This paper presents the results of a survey of 84 female users of medicinal cannabis, recruited through two compassion societies in British Columbia, Canada. Of the seventy-nine respondents who had experienced pregnancy, 51 (65%) reported using cannabis during their pregnancies. While 59 (77%) of the respondents who had been pregnant had experienced nausea and/or vomiting of pregnancy, 40 (68%) had used cannabis to treat the condition, and of these respondents, 37 (over 92%) rated cannabis as ‘extremely effective’ or ‘effective.’ Our findings support the need for further investigations into cannabis therapy for severe nausea and vomiting during pregnancy.     

Treatment of pregnancy sickness.

A double-blind comparison was undertaken between Debendox with 10mg of extra pyridoxine and placebo with 10mg of pyridoxine, in 56 women suffering from nausea and/or vomiting during the first 10 weeks of pregnancy. The results of treatment were assessed on the patient's own dialy records of:the time of nausea, the frequency of nausea, and the severity of nausea, retching and vomiting. There were statistically significant differences in favour of Debendox with extra pyridoxine in respect of the days of nausea all day (P les than 0-02), the severity of nausea (P less than 0-05) and the severity of retching (P less than 0.05).     

The pregnancy “super-utilizer”: how does a high-risk depression screen affect medical utilization?

Objective: Our objective was to determine whether a score of >11 on the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) at the initial prenatal visit was associated with an increased use of acute medical visits when compared to pregnant women with an initial EPDS score of ≤11.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing the utilization of acute medical care during pregnancy and the first eight weeks after delivery amongst 200 women with an EPDS score >11 at their initial prenatal visit compared with 200 women with an EPDS score ≤11. “Super-utilization” was defined as ≥4 acute or unscheduled medical visits during pregnancy and the first eight weeks after delivery (90th percentile). Logistic regression was used to control for confounders.

Results: Women with an initial EPDS score >11 were significantly more likely to engage in super-utilization of acute medical care compared with those women scoring ≤11 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53–3.90).

Conclusions: Pregnant women scoring >11 on the EPDS at their initial prenatal visit are more likely to super-utilize acute medical care in the perinatal period. This subset of patients at-risk for increased utilization can be identified early during prenatal care. Interventions to better meet the medical and psychosocial needs of these women warrant future research.     

Ethnicity and Sources of Prenatal Care: Findings from a National Survey

Background: Improving pregnancy outcomes for minorities is a major goal of health providers and policy makers. Since most strategies involve an intervention during pregnancy, it is important to know where minority women with various characteristics receive prenatal care and why. Our purpose was to evaluate services of prenatal care for white, African-American, Mexican-American, and Puerto Rican women. Methods: The National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (1988) was used to ascertain age, income, marital status, education level, and source of funding of the study population of 21,000 women, who were assigned to an ethnic group based on self-identification in the survey. The sources of prenatal care were classified as private (private physician, nurse-midwife, health maintenance organization) or public (state or local health department, community health center, hospital-based clinic). Results: When categorized by ethnic group alone, 78 percent of white women received private care compared with 51 percent of Mexican-American women, 44 percent of African-American women, and 37 percent of Puerto Rican women. Private health insurance was held by 78 percent of white, 50 percent of African-American, 49 percent of Mexican-American, and 47 percent of Puerto Rican women. Of those with private insurance, 86, 62, 69, and 59 percent, respectively, received private care. Of white women with Medicaid funding, 52 percent received private care as opposed to a range of 20 to 42 percent for minority women. Conclusions: Substantial differences in sources of prenatal care exist between white and minority women and between different minority groups, suggesting that policy makers and health caregivers should tailor prenatal care intervention to the needs of specific minority populations.