腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎72例体会

目的总结腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的体会。方法回顾性分析我院2005年8月-2008年8月72例急性胆囊炎（Acute cholecystitis,AC）腹腔镜胆囊切除术（Laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC）患者的临床资料。结果全组LC成功率91．67％,中转开腹8．33％,无死亡病例。结论对于LC临床经验丰富、技术熟练的外科医师,采用LC手术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎是安全的。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的效果分析

目的分析腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎的效果。方法在我院收治的急性结石性胆囊炎患者中选取70例,起止时间是2017年3月-2019年6月。按照入院编号分为两组:开腹胆囊切除术35例作为对照组,腹腔镜胆囊切除术35例作为试验组。评定术后疗效。结果在手术、排气、住院时间上,试验组均明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。术后,试验组并发症出现2例(5.7%),少于对照组的8例(22.9%),差异显著(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎疗效优于开腹手术,能减少术后并发症、缩短恢复时间,推荐患者优先选用。     

早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性非结石性胆囊炎的效果

目的比较早期(≤72 h)腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性非结石性胆囊炎(AAC)及急性结石性胆囊炎(ACC)的临床疗效。方法2010年11月至2014年9月,该院采用早期(≤72 h)腹腔镜胆囊切除术对125例急性胆囊炎患者行手术治疗,其中AAC 28例,ACC 97例,观察两组患者术后并发症发生率、手术时间、住院时间、中转开腹率、围术期死亡率,并作对比分析。结果两组手术时间,住院时间,围术期死亡率及其他术后并发症未见明显差异(P0.05)。AAC组术中中转开腹率明显高于ACC组(P0.05),胆囊坏疽率明显高于ACC组(P0.05)。结论早期(≤72 h)腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗AAC效果与ACC相似,可作为AAC治疗的可靠选择。     

观察腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎合并糖尿病患者的效果

目的:研究腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎合并糖尿病患者的临床效果.方法:从我院收治的急性结石性胆囊炎合并糖尿病患者(2018年1月-2022年10月)中随机选择100例,均分为观察组(n=50)和对照组(n=50),对比临床效果.结果:经过治疗,观察组的手术时间明显更短,术中出血量更少,术后排气时间、肠鸣音恢复时...     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎216例临床分析

目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)治疗急性胆囊炎的临床经验。方法回顾性分析复旦大学附属中山医院青浦分院2010年1月-2013年1月行LC的216例急性胆囊炎患者临床资料。手术采用气管插管全麻,常规采用三孔法,必要时增加一戳孔以利于操作。术后引流管放置1~3 d,使用抗生素3~5 d。观察手术时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症发生率。术后所有患者均随访至少半年。结果本组LC成功率87.0%(188/216),中转开腹率13.0%(28/216),平均手术时间(62.00±11.27)min,平均住院时间(4.60±2.16)d,并发症发生率2.3%(5/216),患者均痊愈出院。随访期间均无其他并发症发生,术后恢复均良好。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎是安全可行的,正确处理好胆囊三角及良好的术中引流是手术成功的关键。     

急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术53例临床分析

目的探讨急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）的手术技巧。方法急性胆囊炎行LC 53例,中转开腹3例。回顾53例LC操作经验并进行总结分析。结果 50例LC手术成功,手术时间30～180 min,平均79 min,术中出血5～200 ml,平均住院6.5d（3～16 d）。结论急性胆囊炎首选LC。腹腔镜下顺行切除胆囊更加安全、快捷。     

老年急性胆囊炎患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术138例临床分析

随着人口结构渐趋老龄化,老年急性胆囊炎发病率也在逐年升高。由于老年患者各脏器功能减退,合并有其他系统的慢性疾病,病情复杂、进展快,故导致开腹手术风险大,手术并发症和病死率亦高。而腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)创伤小,恢复快,     

择期和急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎患者临床效果比较研究

目的 比较择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术（SLC）与急诊LC治疗急性胆囊炎患者的临床应用效果。方法 2014年1月～2016年6月我院诊治的92例急性胆囊炎患者,其中应用SLC治疗52例,应用急诊LC治疗40例。在行SLC时,先行在B超实时引导下经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术,抽出胆汁,同时予以抗感染治疗。在炎症控制后3月,再入院行LC,在行急诊LC时,于发病72 h内行急诊LC术,手术中依照常规方法留置腹腔引流管,手术结束后进行抗感染治疗。结果 两组均成功顺利完成手术。SLC治疗患者手术时间、肛门排气时间和术后住院时间分别为（60.2±7.0） min、（24.1±3.3） h和（5.6±1.3） d,中转开腹和胆道损伤发生例数分别为3例（5.8%）和0例（0.0%）,而急诊LC治疗组则分别为（58.7±8.1） min（P=0.784）、（26.2±5.8） h(P=0.047)和（8.1±1.9） d(P=0.029),中转开腹和胆道损伤发生例数分别为8例（20.0%, P=0.018)和7例（17.5%, P=0.039); SLC组术后发生出血、肺部感染、切口感染和胆漏等并发症发生率为5.8%,显著低于对照组的25.0%（P<0.05）。结论 SLC术治疗急性胆囊炎患者临床效果好,更安全,应尽量减少行急诊LC术治疗急性胆囊炎患者。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术作为急性胆囊炎治疗选择的评价

目的　对腹腔镜胆囊切除术（ＬＣ）作为急性胆囊炎的治疗选择作出评估。方法　采用回顾性调查方法对ＬＣ治疗的２０７ 例胆囊结石伴急性胆囊炎患者的中转开腹、术后并发症情况及影响中转开腹的一些因素进行研究。结果　本组中转开腹率达３２．３％ ,中转开腹的术后并发症发生率（２０．９％ ）显著高于非中转开腹病例（５．７％ ）。影响中转开腹的因素有患者的性别,急性胆囊炎的胆囊状况,现病史长短,发病至手术的时间及外周血白细胞计数等。结论　对急性胆囊炎选择ＬＣ应慎重,对经判断中转风险较高的病例,不宜选择ＬＣ。     

高龄急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术54例治疗体会

腹腔镜胆囊切除术( laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)作为慢性胆囊良性疾病治疗的金标准,已得到人们普遍认可.对于急性胆囊炎而言,曾被认为是LC手术的相对禁忌证.随着腹腔镜设备的不断完善和手术经验的积累,急性胆囊炎已不再是LC的禁忌证,LC越来越多地用于急性结石性胆囊炎的治疗[1].但老年患者因其年老体弱、常合并有其他系统的慢性疾病,增加了LC手术的风险.本文回顾性分析我院收治的高龄急性胆囊炎患者(年龄≥70岁)54例实施LC治疗的临床资料,以探讨高龄急性胆囊炎早期实施LC的安全性和可行性.     

急性胆囊炎腹腔镜与开腹手术的对比分析

目的对比分析急性胆囊炎腹腔镜与开腹手术的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2001年至2008年急性胆囊炎或慢性胆囊炎急性发作行胆囊切除术病例200例,其中行腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）67例,开腹胆囊切除术（OC）133例。结果LC组的术中出血量、手术时间、下床活动时间、肠道功能恢复时间、住院时间明显低于OC组（P〈0.05）;两组术后并发症发生率无明显差异（P〉0.05）。结论LC治疗急性胆囊炎的临床效果优于OC。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的效果及预后

目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术对急性胆囊炎(AC)患者术中、术后恢复情况及术后血清脂多糖(LPS)、淀粉酶(AMY)、促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)水平变化的影响。方法选取2015年12月-2017年5月咸阳市中心医院收治的98例AC患者进行回顾性分析,根据不同术式分为观察组(n=49)与对照组(n=49)。对照组行传统开腹胆囊切除术,观察组行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。对比两组术中及术后恢复情况(手术切口长度、手术用时、术中出血量、术后下床活动时间及住院时间)、手术前及术后72 h血清LPS、AMY、ACTH水平、免疫功能[T淋巴细胞亚群(CD3^+、CD4^+、CD4^+/CD8^+)]和术后并发症发生率。计量资料两组间比较采用t检验,计数资料两组间比较采用χ2检验。结果与对照组比较,观察组手术切口短、手术用时少、术中出血量低、下床活动及住院时间短(t值分别为26.782、2.950、28.997、11.559、14.678,P值均<0.05),随访1个月后并发症发生率低(8.16%vs 22.45%,χ2=9.137,P=0.002);手术前两组血清LPS、AMY、ACTH水平及CD3^+、CD4^+、CD4^+/CD8^+比较差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05),术后72 h,观察组LPS、AMY、ACTH明显低于对照组(t值分别为8.762、5.370、3.607,P值均<0.001),CD3^+、CD4^+、CD4^+/CD8^+明显高于对照组(t值分别为5.604、6.611、12.025,P值均<0.001)。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗AC疗效显著,可有效改善血清LPS、AMY水平,且对免疫功能影响相对较小,有利于减轻术后应激反应、降低并发症发生率。     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallstone patients with acute cholecystitis

It remains controversial whether patients with gallstones with acute cholecystitis should be operated on early, or whether surgery should be delayed until the acute phase subsides. To help resolve this question, we retrospectively studied 109 patients with acute cholecystitis, 56 of whom underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis had subsided (delayed group) and 53 of whom underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy—within 7 days after admission (early group). On admission, the inflammatory findings in the two groups were very similar; however, at operation, the inflammatory findings were alleviated in the delayed group, while they remained unchanged in the early group. The mean operative time for the two groups was very similar. As for intraoperative complications, there was no conversion to laparotomy in either group, and there were no major complications in either group. The total hospital stay was 37.7 ± 14.4 days for the delayed group and 12.7 ± 2.0 days for the early group, showing a highly significant difference (P < 0.001). Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems to be better than delayed treatment for patients with gallstones with acute cholecystitis. Received: April 27, 1998/Accepted: November 27, 1998     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

The application of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Lap. C) for acute cholecystitis (AC) remains controversial from the viewpoint of its higher rate of morbidity, and conversion to open surgery, in spite of the worldwide acceptance of Lap. C as the gold standard for the treatment of patients with symptomatic gallbladder diseases. The conversion rate has been reported to decrease with experience. Local and overall complication rates were shown to correlate with the time delay between the onset of acute symptoms and the operation. Although percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PGBD) has been reported to be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of AC, it should be limited to high‐risk groups such as elderly or critically ill patients. Early cholecystectomy within 4 days from the onset is strongly recommended to minimize surgical complications and to increase the chance of a successful laparoscopic approach.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

From October 1991 to March 1994, 35 patients (20 men and 15 women) with acute cholecystitis (AC) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). They ranged in age from 17 to 82 years (mean, 51.7 years). Nine of the 35 patients (25.7%) had either percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) or percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration (PTGBA) performed preoperatively. The mean operative time was 183.7 min. Four of the 35 patients (11.4%) required conversion to open laparotomy. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 11.2 days and postoperative morbidity rate was 2.9%. There were no major complications and no deaths. In this retrospective study, we divided the patients into three groups according to the surgical timing of LC in relation to onset. Two of the three groups had LC performed more than 7 days after onset; these groups were termed, collectively, the delayed LC group. The group that had LC performed within 7 days of onset we termed the early LC group. The early LC group had a shorter operative time, less blood loss, and a shorter postoperative hospital stay than the delayed LC group, but the differences were not significant. Nevertheless, we suggest that early LC for AC should be employed for patients who are in a stable condition and who have no preoperative associated medical problems. In the delayed LC group, there were no significant differences in findings between patients who received or did not receive either PTGBD or PTGBA. PTGBD and PTGBA are useful procedures for the relief of acute severe symptoms in patients whose condition is refractory to treatments such as i.v. antibiotic infusion and no oral feeding. We conclude that a laparoscopic procedure for patients with AC, when performed by experienced surgeons, is safe, technically feasible, and useful.     

胆囊部分切除术治疗胆囊形态异常合并泥沙样结石性胆囊炎的效果分析

目的探讨腹腔镜下胆囊部分切除术治疗胆囊形态异常合并泥沙样结石性胆囊炎的应用价值。方法选取2010年7月-2014年1月于大连市友谊医院行腹腔镜联合胆道镜胆囊部分切除术治疗的胆囊形态异常合并泥沙样结石性胆囊炎患者18例。所有患者均伴有胆囊形态的异常,表现为胆囊折叠或胆囊腺肌症;病变部位皆位于胆囊的远端。术前将胆囊病变部分和正常胆囊拟保留部分分别做胆囊收缩试验。术中胆道镜检查胆囊管通畅,胆囊壁弹性好,无明显慢性炎症。切除有病变的胆囊后,4-0可吸收线连续两层缝合胆囊。计量资料组间比较采用独立样本t检验。结果所有患者手术均获成功,手术时间平均(98.0±9.0)min,排气时间平均(22.8±2.5)h。术后6 h下床活动并进水,24 h后进食;术后5~7 d痊愈出院,无胆漏等并发症发生。随访6~80个月,患者术前临床症状消失,无结石复发。术后6~12个月胆囊代偿性扩张,体积平均(30.29±4.23)cm3,较术前(21.72±4.34)cm3明显增大(t=-13.00,P0.001);术后胆囊收缩平均(56.9±10.9)%,较术前(48.5±12.7)%显著提高(t=-6.11,P0.001)。结论腹腔镜结合胆道镜行胆囊部分切除术治疗胆囊形态异常合并泥沙样结石性胆囊炎,对保护胆囊及胆囊功能具有重要意义,在严格掌握适应证的情况下有望成为手术保胆治疗的一种新术式。     

急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术252例

目的:探讨急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)的手术操作要点．方法:回顾性分析本院1995-10／2005-10收治的252例胆囊结石并急性胆囊炎LC病例．结果:应用熟练的镜下操作技术,仔细解剖 Calot三角、近胆囊断离胆囊动脉、恰当处理术中出血、灵活应用电凝止血与钛夹止血相结合,顺利完成腹腔镜胆囊切除术244例,中转开腹胆囊切除术8例,系因合并胆囊癌、十二指肠球部巨大溃疡、Mirizzi综合征、胆囊壶腹部与胆总管粘连严重、胆囊十二指肠致密粘连及内瘘形成等原因而中转开腹,无术中大出血、肝外胆管损伤而中转开腹的病例．无术后胆漏、腹腔内出血等严重并发症发生．近期随访无胆管狭窄并发症发生．结论:急性胆囊炎行LC安全可行,关键是术者必须充分了解LC操作要点和熟练掌握操作技术．     

Single-port versus multi-port cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis: a retrospective comparative analysis

BACKGROUND: Trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy for chronic gallbladder disease is becoming increasingly accepted worldwide. But so far, no reports exist about the challenging single-port surgery for acute cholecystitis. The objective of this study was to describe our experience with single-port cholecystectomy in comparison to the conventional laparoscopic technique. METHODS: Between August 2008 and March 2010, 73 patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease and histopathological sign...