Phase II study of copanlisib,a PI3K inhibitor,in relapsed or refractory,indolent or aggressive lymphoma

BackgroundCopanlisib is a pan-class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor with predominant activity against the α- and δ-isoforms.Patients and methodsThis phase II study evaluated the response rate of copanlisib administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, in patients with indolent or aggressive malignant lymphoma. Archival tumor tissues were used for immunohistochemistry, gene-expression profiling, and mutation analysis.ResultsThirty-three patients with indolent lymphoma and 51 with aggressive lymphoma received copanlisib. Follicular lymphoma (48.5%) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (33.3%) were the most common histologic subtypes. Most patients (78.6%) had received prior rituximab and 54.8% were rituximab-refractory. Median duration of treatment was 23 and 8 weeks in the indolent and aggressive cohorts, respectively (overall range 2–138). Eighty patients were evaluated for efficacy. The objective response rate was 43.7% (14/32) in the indolent cohort and 27.1% (13/48) in the aggressive cohort; median progression-free survival was 294 days (range 0–874) and 70 days (range 0–897), respectively; median duration of response was 390 days (range 0–825) and 166 days (range 0–786), respectively. Common adverse events included hyperglycemia (57.1%; grade ≥3, 23.8%), hypertension (54.8%; grade ≥3, 40.5%), and diarrhea (40.5%; grade ≥3, 4.8%), all generally manageable. Neutropenia occurred in 28.6% of patients (grade 4, 11.9%). Molecular analyses showed enhanced antitumor activity in tumors with upregulated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway gene expression.ConclusionIntravenous copanlisib demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with various subtypes of indolent and aggressive malignant lymphoma. Subtype-specific studies of copanlisib in patients with follicular, peripheral T-cell, and mantle cell lymphomas are ongoing.This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01660451 (Part A).     

N-methylformamide: cytotoxic, radiosensitizer, or chemosensitizer

N-methylformamide (NMF), a polar solvent, is currently being evaluated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) as an antineoplastic agent because of its activity against colon, mammary, and lung tumor xenografts. Results from preclinical studies suggest that it has radiosensitizing, chemosensitizing, and differentiating activity. Its mechanism of action remains unknown, but may involve cellular depletion of glutathione, cell membrane changes, or modulation of proto-oncogene expression. Preclinical toxicology studies conducted in mice, rats, and beagle dogs showed reversible hepatotoxicity to be dose-limiting. Clinically, NMF is administered both orally and by intravenous (IV) injection. The bioavailability with oral administration is 90% to 95%. The highest reported plasma concentration of NMF is approximately 4 mmol/L in a patient who received a dose of 2,000 mg/m2 of IV NMF. Biphasic elimination with IV NMF is seen on both the daily for five days and weekly for 3 weeks schedule. Approximately 5% to 7% of the total administered IV dose is excreted in the urine. In phase I studies, dose-limiting toxicities included reversible hepatotoxicity, a generalized malaise syndrome, and nausea and vomiting. One partial response has been reported in the 111 patients treated on phase II trials in colorectal, head and neck, and renal carcinomas. Suggestions for the future development of this drug are presented.     

Checkpoint Inhibitors,Palliative Care,or Hospice

Purpose

Checkpoint (CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1) inhibitors have changed the face of oncology. A subset of patients enjoys long, gratifying treatment responses. Unfortunately, most patients do not respond even when expressing favorably markers such as PD-L1. Checkpoint inhibitors are largely palliative (though a subset have long-term cancer responses) and as such patient-related outcome measures should be included when evaluating benefits. The purpose of this review is to place checkpoint inhibitor trials within a palliation context. Included is a discussion on potential adverse effects on end-of-life care.

Recent Findings

Pivotal studies have presented efficacy and safety data but we have little published data on quality of life or symptom responses. Extension of life is approximately 2–3 months with some long-term responses in a minority of patients. The cost of checkpoint inhibitors is high for utility (as measured by quality-adjusted life-year saved) and ranges from 81,000 to over 200,000 USD for quality-adjusted life-year saved. Adverse effects were suboptimally reported in multiple studies. Meaningful responses in many trials as defined by the European Society of Medical Oncology are modest.

Summary

Because at least for now, checkpoint inhibitors are used in advanced cancer and largely palliative patients should be seen by palliative specialists, symptoms related to cancer assessed, and advanced directives addressed. Treatment-related autoimmune diseases represent toxicities which oncologists and palliative specialists must understand. This means that palliative care specialists should know about the benefits and adverse effects of these agents. Whether checkpoint inhibitors increase or decrease aggressive care, hospice referrals, and costs at the end of life is yet to be determined.

     

Cholelithiasis in gallbladder cancer: Coincidence,cofactor, or cause!

Background

While gallstones are associated with cancers of the gallbladder, the actual nature of their relationship needs to be clarified. This would aid the recommendations on the need for prophylactic cholecystectomy.

Methods

A systematic search of the scientific literature was carried out using the Medline, the Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for the years 1891–2009 to obtain access to all publications involving gallstones in gallbladder cancer.

Results

While some epidemiological evidence supports a causal relationship for gallstones in gallbladder cancer, other studies have demonstrated a relatively low incidence of gallbladder cancer in countries reporting a high incidence of gallstones as a whole. In those studies where gallstones appear to have a causative role for cancer, the risk increases with increasing size, volume and weight, and number of the stones. The impact of duration of the stone or its composition is not clear. Experimental evidence from studies examining the impact of artificially introducing gallstones in the gallbladder has failed to lead to carcinogenesis.

Conclusions

The evidence at the current time indicates that gallstones are a cofactor in the causation of gallbladder cancer. Absolute proof of their role as a cause for gallbladder cancer is lacking. The recommendation for prophylactic cholecystectomy in countries reporting a high incidence of gallbladder cancer and associated gallstones needs to be tailored to the epidemiological profile of the place.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery of residual or recurrent craniopharyngioma, after surgery, with or without radiation therapy

This study evaluated the role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the multimodality management of craniopharyngioma patients whose prior therapies failed. Ten consecutive patients (3 males and 7 females) had radiosurgery for craniopharyngioma during a 10-year interval. Their ages ranged from 9 to 64 years (median, 14.5 years). The median interval between diagnosis and radiosurgery was 46.5 months. In total, 12 stereotactic radiosurgical procedures were performed to control the solid component of the tumor (2 intrasellar and 10 suprasellar tumors). The median tumor volume was 1.35 cm3. One to 9 isocenters with different beam diameters were used; the median marginal dose was 16.4 Gy; and the dose to the optic apparatus was limited to less than 8 Gy. Clinical and imaging follow-up data were obtained at a median of 63 months (range, 13-150 months) from radiosurgery. Overall, 7 of 12 tumors became smaller or vanished within a median of 8.5 months. Prior visual defects objectively improved in 6 patients. One patient with prior visual defect deteriorated further and lost vision 9 months after radiosurgery. Multimodality therapy is often necessary for patients with refractory solid and cystic craniopharyngiomas. Stereotactic radiosurgery is a reasonable option in select patients with small recurrent or residual craniopharyngioma.     

Chemotherapy (gemcitabine,docetaxel plus gemcitabine,doxorubicin, or trabectedin) in inoperable,locally advanced,recurrent, or metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a clinical practice guideline

Questions

Does chemotherapy—that is, gemcitabine, gemcitabine plus docetaxel, doxorubicin, or trabectedin—improve clinical outcomes in women with inoperable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma (lms)?Is there a difference in the tumour response rate to chemotherapy between recurrent pelvic disease and extrapelvic metastases in the target patients?

Methods

This guideline was developed by Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidence-Based Care, the Sarcoma Disease Site Group (dsg), and the Gynecologic Cancer dsg. The core methodology was the systematic review. The medline and embase databases (2004 to June 2011), the Cochrane Library, main guideline Web sites, and relevant annual meeting abstracts (2005–2010) were searched. Internal and external reviews were conducted, with final approval by the dsgs and the Program in Evidence-Based Care.

Clinical Practice Guideline

Based on currently available evidence from the medical literature (four single-arm phase ii studies, one arm of a randomized controlled trial, and one abstract), doxorubicin alone, gemcitabine alone, or gemcitabine plus docetaxel may be treatment options in first- or second-line therapy (or both) for women with inoperable, locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic uterine lms.Hematologic toxicity is common and should be monitored, and granulocyte colony–stimulating factor should be considered when gemcitabine plus docetaxel is used. Other toxicities, such as neurotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, and cardiovascular toxicity should be monitored.No recommendation is made for or against the use of trabectedin in the targeted patients.No data were available concerning differences in response in recurrent pelvic disease or extrapelvic metastases, or concerning quality of life.     

Paclitaxel and carboplatin, alone or with irradiation, in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of carboplatin plus paclitaxel in primarily advanced or recurrent endometrial cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four distinct patient groups received carboplatin (area under the curve, 5 to 7) plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) for 3 hours at 4-week intervals: group 1 (n = 21), patients with primarily advanced, nonpapillary serous cancers; group 2 (n = 20), the same as group 1 but with papillary serous cancers; group 3 (n = 18), recurrent, nonpapillary serous cancers; and group 4 (n = 4), recurrent, papillary serous cancers. Involved-field irradiation was used in groups 1 and 2 for those with radioencompassable disease. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were treated. Response rates to chemotherapy in the assessable patients in the four groups were 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51% to 100%); 60% (95% CI, 35% to 85%), 56% (95% CI, 34% to 78%), and 50%, respectively. Nineteen patients (90%) in group 1 also were irradiated, and the median failure-free survival time for all 21 patients was 23 months, with a 62% 3-year overall survival rate. Eleven patients (55%) in group 2 were irradiated, and the median failure-free survival time for all 18 patients was 18 months, with a 39% 3-year overall survival rate. The median failure-free interval in the patients in group 3 was 6 months, with a 15-month median overall survival time. Toxicity was manageable, reversible, and predominantly hematologic. Two patients developed neutropenic fever, and three patients, including these two, were hospitalized for complications. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin-paclitaxel is an efficacious, low-toxicity regimen for managing primarily advanced or recurrent endometrial cancers.     

Thymidine as an anticancer agent,alone or in combination

Summary The value of thymidine as a cytotoxic drug alone or in combination with other pyrimidine antimetabolites has received considerable attention in recent years.In this paper, the biochemical basis for the cytotoxicity of thymidine and its interaction with other pyrimidine antimetabolites is described. It is indicated that early clinical trials have largely failed to substantiate data from experimental studies that have shown thymidine to be an effective antimetabolite and capable of potentiating the antineoplastic effect of several other agents.It is suggested that tumours likely to respond to thymidine alone or in combination may be identified by measuring in clinical tumour specimens known biochemical determinats of thymidine efficacy.PHE is an Applied Health Fellow of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia     

Phase II studies on docetaxel alone every third week,or weekly in combination with gemcitabine in patients with primary locally advanced,metastatic, or recurrent esophageal cancer

Background The purpose of these studies was to compare efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel alone with the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel for treatment of metastatic esophageal carcinoma. Patients and methods These studies enrolled patients with histopathologically verified squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or cardia. Between March 1997 and June 1999, 52 patients were enrolled in the initial Phase II study (Study 1). They were scheduled for treatment with docetaxel 100 mg/m² every third week as a 1-h infusion. The second Phase II study between September 2000 and March 2003 included 65 patients (Study II). They were given docetaxel 30 mg/m², administered as a 30-min i.v. infusion weekly for four times, followed by 2 weeks of rest, and gemcitabine starting with a dose of 750 mg/m² (if well-tolerated 1,000 mg/m²) on days 1 and 15, followed by 3 weeks of rest. A new cycle began on day 36. Patients were premedicated with betamethasone 8 mg p.o. on the evening before, and 8 mg i.v. 30–60 min before the docetaxel infusion. Response was confirmed by computed tomography and assessed at 12 and 24 weeks. Toxicity was assessed according to WHO scales. Results In study I, 38 out of the 52 enrolled patients were valuable. Two patients experienced complete remission (CR) (5%), 10 patients partial remission (PR) (26%), nine patients stable disease (SD) (24%), and 17 patients showed progressive disease (PD) (45%). Toxicity mainly involved leukopenia, which in some cases required hospitalization and treatment with antibiotics. In Study II, 46 out of the 65 enrolled patients (70%) were assessable. Out of these, three patients (7%) had CR, eight patients (17%) had PR, 10 patients (22%) had SD, and 25 (54%) PD. Overall response was 24% while an additional 22% showed stable disease. Toxicity mainly consisted of leucopenia and pain. Conclusion Docetaxel as a single agent is active in esophageal cancer, both in treatment naive and in previously treated patients with recurrent disease. The overall response rate was 31%, with a good-safety profile. The addition of gemcitabine is well tolerated, but adds no efficacy. Weekly administration of docetaxel may be less effective. It demonstrates moderate efficacy and the doses used provide an acceptable safety profile.     

Treatment of newly diagnosed AML, RAEB-t or RAEB with lisofylline or placebo in addition to chemotherapy.

To determine whether the addition of lisofylline (LSF) to idarubicin (12 mg/m2 daily x 3) + ara-C (1.5 g/m2 daily x 4) affects the rates of infection, serious infection, CR or mortality during remission induction of newly diagnosed AML, RAEB-t or RAEB, we randomized 70 patients to 3 mg/kg lisofylline or placebo every 6 h i.v., to begin 6 h before the first dose of idarubicin and to continue until recovery of neutrophil and platelet counts or for 28 days, whichever came first. Eligibility required that patients be below age 71 years, have no history of abnormal counts, or chemotherapy for a prior malignancy, and have a creatinine <1.6 mg/dl and bilirubin <3.0 mg/dl. The study was double-blinded and infections were tabulated separately and independently at MD Anderson and by a three-member outside panel of experts. Logistic regression was used to assess the relative effects of treatment arm (LSF or placebo), age, performance status, treatment site (laminar air flow room or not), and cytogenetics on rates of infection and serious infection following the first course of chemotherapy, and on CR rate. There were 84% and 87% concordance between the expert panel and MD Anderson enumerations of infection and serious infections, respectively. Both analyses found no significant (P < 0.05) differences between the rates of infection, or serious infection, in the placebo and LSF groups. CR, 60-day, and overall mortality rates were similar in the two groups, as were time to neutrophil and blood count recovery and outcome once in CR. Logistic regression analyses supported the above conclusions. Severe nausea/vomiting and mucositis were more frequent in the LSF group. Our results suggest that larger studies of LSF in newly diagnosed AML, RAEB-t, or RAEB are not warranted.