An Optimized AV Delay Algorithm for Patients with Intermittent Atrioventricular Conduction

Detection and promotion of an intermittent atrioventricular (A V) conduction is the objective of an AV delay hysteresis algorithm in dual chamber pacemaker (DDDj pacing. The AV delay following an atrial event is automatically extended by a programmable interval (AV hysteresis interval) if the previous cycle showed spontaneous AV conduction, i.e., a ventricular event was detected within the previous AV delay. An automatic search mode scans for spontaneous ventricular events during the hysteresis interval: a single AV delay extension (equal to the programmed AV delay hysteresis) will occur after a successive, programmable number of AV cycles with ventricular pacing. If a spontaneous AV conduction is present, the AV delay will remain extended by the hysteresis interval. Our first results in 17 patients with intermittent AV block disclosed a satisfactorily working algorithm with effective reduction of ventricular stimuli. In relation to the underlying conduction disturbance and pacemaker settings, the majority of our patients showed a reduction of ventricular pacing events up to 90% without any adverse hemodynamic or electrophysiological changes. Based on clinical (promotion of a physiological activation and contraction sequence) and technical (reduction of power consumption) advantages, the AV hysteresis principle could be of incremental value for future dual chamber pacing in patients with intermittent complete heart block.     

Ventriculoatrial Conduction: A Cause of Atrial Malpacing in AV Universal Pacemakers. A Report of Two Cases

Retrograde atrial activation during ventricular pacing has often been a cause of intermittent or persistent arrhythmias (pacemaker-mediated tachycardia) in AV universal pacemakers. We recently encountered two cases in which VA conduction was responsible for atrial malpacing in patients with an implanted AV universal pacemaker, one programmed in DDD and one in DVI mode. Atrial malpacing was induced by the atrial refractoriness due to retrograde activation. In the first patient, it was observed when the pacemaker was programmed to a rate of 110 ppm (lower rate) and an AV interval of 200 ms in order to check crosstalk. In the second patient, it was observed after ventricular premature contractions.     

Effects of AV Sequential Versus Asynchronous AV Pacing on Pulmonary Hemodynamics

We studied the effects of various pacing modes on cardiac hemodynamics and pulmonary gas alterations in chronic heart blocked dogs. Changing the pacing mode from an atrioventricular interval of 100 ms (AV100) to a ventriculo-atrial interval of 100 ms (VA100) caused a significant fall in left ventricular pressure (117.64 +/- 11.91 to 95.60 +/- 16.58 mmHg) and cardiac output from 2.18 +/- 0.24 to 1.46 +/- 0.20 L/min. Following the change in pacing mode from AV100 to VA100, there was an increase in the alveolar-arterial O2 gradient from 23.28 +/- 6.97 to 28.74 +/- 8.43 mmHg and a decrease in the arterial CO2 tension from 32.42 +/- 3.22 to 29.42 +/- 3.22 mmHg. There was also a decrease in arterial CO2 tension when the AV100 pacing mode was compared to asynchronous ventricular pacing (32.42 +/- 3.22 versus 30.56 +/- 2.82 mmHg). The minute volume of O2 also decreased when the pacing mode was changed from AV100 to asynchronous ventricular pacing (0.134 +/- 0.01 versus 0.126 +/- 0.01 L/min) and decreased further at VA100 to 0.114 +/- 0.01 L/min. Other significant changes were also observed: the percent of expired CO2 decreased when the pacing mode was changed from AV100 to VA100 (3.68 +/- 0.13 versus 3.37 +/- 0.26%) or to asynchronous ventricular pacing (3.40 +/- 0.31%). The end-expiratory O2 increased and CO2 decreased when the pacing mode was changed from AV100 to VA100. The breath-by-breath correlation of end-expiratory O2 and CO2 with left ventricular systolic pressure showed an almost immediate increase in O2 and reduction in CO2 concentration associated with decreasing systolic pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Full Ventricular Capture Indicated by the QT Interval Function

The atrioventricular (AV) interval is critical in dual chamber (DDD) pacing in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) to obtain full ventricular capture (FVC) with maximal reduction of the left ventricular (LV) outflow gradient and optimal LV diastolic filling. We studied the relationship of FVC, fusion, spontaneous AV conduction, and the QT interval. Methods: 11 patients with various cardiac diseases and stable AV conduction received a QT sensing Diamond (tm) Vitatron, DDD pacemaker. Software was downloaded into the pacemaker. In the DDD pacing mode, with the QT interval measured from the ventricular pacing stimulus to the end of the T wave, the AV interval was shortened from 400 ms, in 20-ms steps, to 90 ms. At 90 ms the stimulation rate was increased by 30 beats/mm and the AV interval was increased stepwise. FVC and fusion was examined on the surface ECG, Results: At 400 ms interval, spontaneous AV conduction inhibited the pacemaker. Shortening the AV interval resulted in pacing with a short QT interval. Further reduction of the AV interval resulted in a longer QT interval up to a point where the QT interval became stable. This point, the bending point in the plot of measured QT interval versus shortened AV intervals, coincided with the point of FVC. The relation of the QT-AV interval plot and the point of fusion was comparable when lengthening the AV interval at a 30 beats/mm faster stimulation rate. Conclusion: The bending point in the QT interval versus AV interval plots showed a good correlation with the FVC and fusion points observed on ECG. The results suggest that automatic discrimination between fusion and full capture using QT interval measurements may be feasible.     

Reduction of RV pacing by continuous optimization of the AV interval

BACKGROUND: In patients requiring permanent pacing, preservation of intrinsic ventricular activation is preferred whenever possible. The Search AV+ (SAV+) algorithm in Medtronic EnPulsetrade mark dual-chamber pacemakers can increase atrioventricular (AV) intervals to 320 ms in patients with intact or intermittent AV conduction. This prospective, multicenter study compared the percentage of ventricular pacing with and without AV interval extension. METHODS: Among 197 patients enrolled in the study, the percentage of ventricular-paced beats was evaluated via device diagnostics at the 1-month follow-up. Patient cohorts were defined by clinician assessment of conduction via a 1:1 AV conduction test at the 2-week follow-up. The observed percentage of ventricular pacing with SAV + ON and the predicted percentage of ventricular pacing with SAV + OFF were determined from the SAV + histogram data for the period between the 2-week and 1-month follow-up visits. RESULTS: Of 197 patients, 110 (55.8%) had intact 1:1 AV conduction, of which 109 had 1-month data. SAV + remained ON in 99/109 patients; 10 patients had intrinsic A-V conduction intervals beyond SAV + nominal and therefore SAV + disabled. The mean percentage of ventricular pacing in the 109 patients was SAV+ ON = 23.1% (median 3.7%) versus SAV + OFF = 97.2% (median 99.7%). In 87 patients without 1:1 AV conduction, SAV + was programmed OFF in 6, automatically disabled in 52, and remained ON in 29. In 8 of these patients, 80-100% reduction in ventricular pacing was observed with SAV + ON. CONCLUSION: The Search AV+ algorithm in the EnPulse pacemaker effectively promotes intrinsic ventricular activation and substantially reduces unnecessary ventricular pacing.     

AV Pacing and LV Performance

Five patients with impaired left ventricular function (LV) and implanted AV sequential pacemakers underwent serial radionuclide angiograms. The goal was a non-invasive evaluation of the rapid changes in left ventricular performance elicited by rate, pacing mode and AV interval manipulation. End diastolic volume, end systolic volume, stroke volume and cardiac output were increased by AV sequential pacing in comparison with ventricular pacing at 70 beats per minute. No significant change in ejection fraction and blood pressure were noted with changing AV sequential pacing rates at usual pacing rates. Our data suggest that a short A V interval (150 ms) improved LV performance more than a long AV interval (250 ms). A non-invasive technique to optimize left ventricular performance on an acute basis by varying heart rate, AV interval and pacing mode with the implanted AV sequential pacemaker is feasible and may be useful in selective clinical situations.     

A Case of Ventricular Undersensing in the DDI Mode: Cause and Correction

A case is presented that demonstrates a confusing problem of ventricular undersensing in the DDI pacing mode. Electrocardiographic monitoring of the patient after pacemaker implantation revealed intermittent ventricular channel outputs which appeared to be inappropriate. These occurred a period of time after the intrinsic R wave, equal to the programmed AV interval. This problem was caused by ventricular lead undersensing, which resulted when the patient's intrinsic rate was such that the intrinsic ventricular complex occurred during the ventricular blanking period. The problem was corrected by reprogramming the blanking period.     

Noninvasive Assessment by Doppler and M-Mode Echocardiography of Hemodynamic Responses to Temporary Pacing and to Ventriculoatrial Conduction

A new, dual-chamber temporary pacing lead was introduced via the subclavian vein in 20 patients who needed a temporary pacemaker. Stroke volume (SV) was measured continuously by combining M-mode and noninvasive Doppier echocardiography during spontaneous rhythm (SR), AV sequential pacing at a positive AV interval (DP), ventricular pacing (VP) and AV sequential pacing at a negative AV interval (VA pacing). The valvular functions were determined by Doppler echocardiography. Left ventricular dimensions and function, and left atrial size were measured by M-mode echocardiography. In the nine patients with no valvular heart disease and with no ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction (group I) the CO increased 83 ±11% during DP and 42 ± 9% during VP as compared to during SR when the heart rate (HE) was increased from 34 ± 3 to 72 ± 1 beats/min. The CO was 29 ± 3% higher during DP than that during VP. In the seven patients with valvulox heart disease and with no VA conduction (group II), the increment in CO compared to that during Sfi was SZ ± 12% during DP and 31 ±17% during VP: the CO was 17 ± 4% higher during DP than that during VP. In the four patients with spontaneous VA conduction (group III), the CO during DP was 35 ± 10% greater than that during VP, which did not result in an increase in the CO compared to that during SR in spile of an increase in HR from 52 ± 8 to 74 ± 2 beats/min. The study demonstrated that DP is the preferred temporary pacing mode and also that VA conduction during VP resulted in a mean decrease of 20% in CO compared to that during VP without VA conduction. The hemodynamic benefit from DP compared to SR seems to decrease when the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension increases. Furthermore, patients with large left ventricular end-systolic dimensions seem to have a lower increase in stroke index during DP as compared to that during VP than patients with smaller end-systolic dimensions.     

Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction using an enhanced search AV algorithm

BACKGROUND: Dual chamber pacing typically results in a high percentage of ventricular pacing. A number of studies have been conducted suggesting detrimental effects of ventricular desynchronization produced by long-term RV pacing. Pacemaker algorithms that extend the AV interval to uncover intrinsic AV conduction have been utilized to reduce ventricular pacing. These algorithms are often limited to AV intervals below 250 ms limiting the ventricular pacing reduction. We hypothesized that by allowing AV intervals to extend beyond 300 ms, a marked reduction in RV pacing can be achieved. METHODS: A total of 30 patients (17 men, mean age 71 +/- 9) with standard Brady indications, and implanted with a Medtronic Kappa 700 pacemaker, were randomized to 2-week treatments with default Search AV (KSAV) parameters or Enhanced Search AV (ESAV) parameters. The Enhanced Search AV algorithm included the capability for continuous adjustment of AV delays and the ability to auto disable in patients with persistent AV block. RESULTS: Among patients with intact AV conduction, percent VP was greater in KSAV versus ESAV (70 +/- 40% vs 19 +/- 28%, P < 0.001). In patients with persistent AV block, the algorithm suspended appropriately and there was no significant change in the percent VP between both arms of the study. In 18/22 patients, percent VP was reduced below 40%. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial reduction in ventricular pacing can be achieved by allowing the AV interval parameters to extend beyond 300 ms using the ESAV algorithm. In patients with AV block, ESAV suspended and patients were paced at their nominal settings.     

Intermittent Pacemaker Syndrome: Revision of VVI Pacemaker to a New Cardiac Pacing Mode for Tachy-Brady Syndrome

A patient with tachy-brady syndrome manifested by paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and symptomatic sinus bradycardia and treated by VVI pacing developed pacemaker syndrome during episodes of ventricular pacing. His cardiac pacemaker was revised to a dual chamber system utilizing the new AV sequential DDI pacing mode which eliminated pacemaker-related tachycardias and totally abolished the pacemaker syndrome symptoms. There have been no further episodes of atrial fibrillation, possibly due to elimination of temporal dispersion of refractory periods during bradycardia. The propensity for atrial fibrillation has also been minimized by excluding competitive atrial stimulation during DVI pacing. The DDI mode provides the clinician increased utility and flexibility in the use of AV sequential pacing therapy.     

DDI Pacing: Indications, Expectations, and Follow-Up

The DDI mode of pacing that permits noncompetitive atrioventricular sequential bradycardia support was chosen in 65 of 480 (14%) patients selected for dual chamber pacing between February 1985 and March 1990. All patients were implanted with Pacesetter 283 or 285 pulse generators and programmed to DDI. The indications for pacing were sick sinus syndrome (n = 52), combined sinus node dysfunction and AV block (n = 13). Forty-two of these patients had a history of paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias. All patients received passive fixation atrial and ventricular leads. Follow-up thereafter was performed predischarge, and at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after discharge. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1-61 months (mean 31 months). Fifty-four of 65 (83%) patients chosen for DDI remain programmed in the DDI mode. Three patients were reprogrammed to VVI and eight to DDD. During the course of follow-up, six patients presented with effective VVI pacing with consistent ventriculoatrial conduction that was appropriately sensed by the atrial circuit with atrial output inhibition. A further four patients presented with "functional undersensing" due to ventricular blanking period (VBP) characteristics in these pulse generators and in this mode. Functional undersensing was eliminated in all but one patient by reprogramming the VBP to 13 msec with no subsequent episodes of provoked crosstalk inhibition. Effective VVI pacing was observed in patients with AV block during times of sinus acceleration. While DDI mode is an effective form of pacing, permitting non-competitive atrioventricular sequential pacing, potential limitations include: effective VVI pacing during intact ventriculoatrial conduction, functional undersensing when long VBP are programmed, and effective VI pacing with sinus node acceleration during AV block.     

Apparent Extension of the Atrioventricular Interval Due to Sensor-Based Algorithm Against Supraventricuiar Tachyarrhythmias

Rapid ventricular tracking response to supraventricular tachyarrhythmia is one major limitation to DDD pacing. In a DDDR pacemaker, sensor-based algorithms have been used to control these arrhythmias. These include the use of an interim rate limit (conditional ventricular tracking limit) or a separate maximum tracking and sensor rate limits (discrepant upper rate). These algorithms limit inappropriate ventricular pacing rate during tracking of pathological supraventricuiar tachyarrhythmia and atrial flutter by Wenckebach-like prolongation of the AV interval. We observed that this may cause an unexpected extension of the AV interval in patients with high atrial rate and intact AV nodal conduction. This was due to P wave rate above the conditional ventricular tracking limit or maximum tracking limit, but AV paced interval prolongation was avoided by the occurrence of intrinsic conduction, albeit at an AV interval longer than the programmed AV interval. This might appear as failure of ventricular pacing on the ECG. This phenomenon is a modified form of "upper rate" behavior occurring in the AV interval, and should be recognized as a normal behavior rather than pacemaker malfunction.     

Differentiation of Sinus Tachycardia From Ventricular Tachycardia with 1:1 Ventriculoatrial Conduction in Dual Chamher Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Feasibility of a Criterion Based on the Atrioventricular Interval

Tachycardia discrimination in future implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is likely to be enhanced by the addition of an atrial sensing/pacing lead. However, differentiation of sinus tachycardia (ST) from ventricular tachycardia (VT) with 1:1 VA conduction will remain problematic. We assessed the use of the AV interval as a potential criterion for correctly differentiating ST from VT. Incremental V pacing at the right ventricular (HV) apex served as a “VT” model in each of 41 patients with 1:1 VA conduction to pacing cycle lengths ≤ 450 msec. High right atrial and RV apical electrograms during normal sinus rhythm (NSR) and during incremental V pacing were digitized (simulating ICD sensing). From these signals, AV interval versus pacing cycle length plots were computer generated to identify crossover cycle lengths, each defined as the cycle length at which the AV interval during V pacing equals the AV interval during NSR. At cycle lengths longer than the crossover value, the AV interval during “VT” exceeds the AV interval during NSR. In contrast, the AV interval during ST is physiologically shorter than the AV interval during NSR. Thus, ST can be readily differentiated from “VT” over a range of cycle lengths greater than the crossover value. The overall mean calculated crossover cycle length was 371 ± 52 msec. In 11 patients paced multiple times, each crossover cycle length was reproducible (mean coefficient of variation was 1.2%± 0.9% per patient). AV intervals measured at the RV apex were also analyzed with incremental V pacing during catecholamine stimulation (isoproterenol, n = 5) and during alternate site “VT” (RV outflow tract [n = 8] and left ventricle [n = 2]). In all these cases, the new “VT” plots of AV interval versus pacing cycle length coincided with or fell to the left of those obtained during control RV apical pacing and recording (i.e., these AV interval values crossed the NSR baseline at cycle lengths ≤ the crossover cycle length). Thus, the cycle length range for recognizable differentiation of ST from “VT” remained valid. The data suggest that the described AV interval criterion relying on the crossover cycle length: (1) is a promising approach to improve differentiation of ST from relatively slow VTs with 1:1 VA conduction, and (2) can readily be automated in future dual chamber ICDs, given its computational simplicity.     

Comparison of Intrinsic Versus Paced Ventricular Function

There is increasing evidence supporting the benefits of providing optimum AV delay in cardiac pacing, though controversy exists regarding its value and the benefits of intrinsic versus paced ventricular activation. This study compared various AV delays at rest in patients whose native AV delays were 200 msec. Only patients with DDD pacemakers who had intact AV conduction and normal ventricular activation were included in the study. Nine patients were studied. Methods: Ten studies were performed. Evaluation was done in AAI and DDD modes at paced heart rates of 60/min or as close as possible to the intrinsic heart rate if this was > 60/min. Stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (COJ were measured. Results: When AV sequential pacing in the DDD mode with an optimum AV delay was compared to AAI pacing with a prolonged AV interval, the average optimum AV delay in the DDD mode was 157 msec and ranged from 125 to 175 msec. The average AV interval in the AAI mode was 245 msec and ranged from 212 to 300 msec. In the DDD mode, there was an overall significant improvement in CO of 11% and SV of 9%. Patients with intrinsic AV conduction times of > 220 msec showed an overall significant improvement in CO of 13% and SV of 11%. In patients with intrinsic AV conduction times of < 220 msec, an improvement in CO of 6% and SV of 4% was seen. Conclusions: (1) An optimum AV delay is an important component of hemodynamic performance; and (2) AV sequential pacing at rest with an optimum AV delay may provide better hemodynamic performance than atrial pacing with intrinsic ventricular conduction when native AV conduction is prolonged > 220 msec.     

Responses of an AV Universal (DDD) Pulse Generator (Cordis 233D) to Programmed Single Ventricular Extrastimuli

To evaluate factors playing a role in initiation and perpetuation of pacemaker-mediated tachycardias (PMTs), 22 consecutive patients with symptomatic conduction disorders were studied after implantation of an AV universal (DDD) pulse generator (Cordis 233D). Patients were divided into two groups, depending upon the presence or absence of ventriculo-atrial (VA) conduction during electrophysiological study (EPS) performed before pacemaker implantation. PMTs could be initiated in six of eight patients of Group I and in none of 14 patients of Group II. Initiation and perpetuation of PMTs during DDD pacing were dependent upon the capacity of the patient to conduct ventricular premature beats (VPBs) and subsequent paced ventricular beats retrogradely to the atria, and upon three programmable parameters of the pulse generator (AV delay period, upper rate limit, tachycardia response). Programmed single ventricular extrastimulation demonstrated that: (1) merely the presence of VA conduction during EPS, although necessary, was not sufficient to induce PMTs after DDD pacemaker implantation; (2) VPBs introduced late rather than early in the cardiac cycle initiated PMTs in a different way; (3) the initiation of PMTs could be prevented during study by adjusting the programmable parameters (AV delay period, upper rate limit, tachycardia response); (4) one of the two available tachycardia responses of the pulse generator (gradual fall-back response) was able to terminate and initiate PMTs consistently. These observations helped in understanding the responses of the Cordis 233D pulse generator to ventricular premature beats. They indicate that additional refinement of the pulse generator is necessary to solve the problem of PMT.     

Automatic Beat‐to‐Beat Left Heart AV Normalization:

Programming the right heart AV interval to a normal value may cause a nonphysiological left heart AV due to interatrial and interventricular conduction delays, thus affecting cardiac performance. Since AV normalization at rest and exercise may be invalidated by pacing or sensing (mode) changes, the aim of this study was to (1) study the feasibility of a mode independent pacemaker (PM) algorithm for automatic beat-to-beat left AV normalization, (2) establish normal values for the time between mitral flow A wave (Af) and ventricular activation (Va), the AfVa interval, the mechanical surrogate of left AV, and (C) determine the range of values of the interatrial electromechanical delays (IAEMDs) and the effect of RA pacing. To pace with the proper right AV, the previously reported RV-paced interventricular electromechanical delay and the interatrial electromechanical delay, either P-sensed (IAEMDs) or atrial-paced (IAEMDp) are required inputs. Data were collected during diagnostic echo Doppler studies in 84 subjects divided in three groups: (1) control with narrow QRS and no structural heart disease (n = 33, age 50 +/- 21 years, 42% men); (2) patients in sinus rhythm with diverse cardiac pathologies except LBBB (n = 39, age 69 +/- 14 years, 56% men), and (3) DDD-paced patients (n = 12, mean age 71 +/- 6 years). Normal values of AfVa were established from the control group, while IAEMDs and IAEMDp and active atrial flow time (A-peak), in all subjects. The algorithm was tested by computer simulation under all possible modes with the following calculation: RAV = N + IAEMD - IVD, where RAV is the right AV, N is the desired normal AfVa value, IAEMD is either P-sensed or A-paced, and IVD is close to zero for intrinsic narrow QRS and biventricular pacing, or 79 ms for RV pacing. The results demonstrated (1) Normal (controls) AfVa: 85 +/- 15 ms (range 52-110 ms); (2) IAEMDs (All): 84 +/- 16 ms; (3) atrial pacing prolonged IAEMDs by 57 +/- 18 ms (from 93 +/- 15 to 150 +/- 25 ms, P < 0.0001); and (4) Computer simulation of rate and mode changes validated the normalization algorithm. An automatic, beat-to-beat left AV normalization algorithm to preserve a normal AfVa without a hemodynamic sensor is feasible. The normal value of AfVa is 85 +/- 15 ms.     

Improved Dual Chamber Pacing Mode in Paroxysmal Atrioventricular Conduction Disorders

GIRODO, S., ET AL.: Improved Dual Chamber Pacing Mode in Paroxysmal Atrioventricular Conduction Disorders. Dual chamber pacing may sometimes be directly indicated for carotid sinus hypersensitivity, vasovagal syndrome, and certain cases of sinoatrial block and intermittent atrioventricular (AV) block, although AV conduction is dominantly normal. At times of normal AV conduction, competition between ventricular pacing and spontaneous ventricular depolarization may occur, with its adverse hemodynamic effects on ventricular function and unnecessary drainage of pacemaker battery energy. A new mode of stimulation is described, called automatic DDD mode, which functions in 'pseudo-AAI' mode during normal AV conduction and reverts to classical DDD function during episodes of AV blocks. Furthermore, during pseudo-AAI function, the pacemaker measures certain physiological parameters that serve to automatically program certain parameters used in DDD mode. Preliminary clinical evaluation has shown that this new mode functions satisfactorily.     

Pacemaker Mediated Tachycardia as a Complication of the Autointrinsic Conduction Search Function

The autointrinsic conduction search (AICS) option, featured on some DDD pacemakers, performs periodic assessments of atrioventricular (AV) conduction capability during a single beat AV delay extension. Demonstration of ventricular conduction during the prolonged AV delay, permits ongoing AV delay extension if the patient's intrinsic conduction is preferred to ventricular pacing. A case is presented where the wide separation of atrial and ventricular pacing during the conduction search permitted retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction, precipitating pacemaker mediated tachycardia (PMT) on seven occasions in one patient. Two onset patterns are reported, both attributable to the AICS option. Recommendations for prevention strategies are made. (PACE 2004; 27[Pt. I]:824–826)     

Proposal of a Method for Automatic Optimization of Left Heart Atrioventricular Interval Applicable to DDD Pacemakers

Electrical pacing of the right heart is known to cause delays in the depolarization of left heart chambers, leading to abnormal left heart AV sequence. Interatrial conduction time, defined as the time from the right atrial pacing pulse or intrinsic P to the onset of left atrial P wave, and P wave sensing delay cause a shorter left heart AV interval during atrial pacing-ventricular sensing and atrial sense-ventricular pace. Interventricular conduction time (the time from the right ventricular pacing pulse to the onset of left ventricular depolarization), lengthens left heart AV interval during atrial sensing-ventricular pacing. These delays may add up or partly cancel out, depending on pacing mode. Thus, an algorithm for DDD pacemakers to optimize left heart AV interval by compensating for the above delays is proposed. This algorithm takes into account pacing and sensing delays to deliver a certain AV sequence to the right heart, aimed at producing a physiological left heart AV interval. The optimization of left heart AV interval is achieved by automatically changing right heart AV interval and pacing mode in accordance with known interatrial and interventricular conduction delays, and P wave sense offset.