Predictors of Success in Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrial Flutter

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter at the isthmus between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava is established. However in selected patients, the creation of a continuous linear lesion at the targeted isthmus requires a lengthened procedure or is not feasible at all and atrial flutter recurrences are common.In a retrospective analysis, we found that an intraoperatively determined distance between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava of <.2.5 cm is an independent predictor of a lengthened or failed ablation procedure. Additional equipment, e.g., long introducer sheaths, adapted ablation catheter design, or irrigated tip ablation, as well as alternative ablation approaches, e.g., linear lesions between the tricuspid annulus and Eustachian ridge, have been invented in order to increase the acute success rate or decrease fluoroscopy and procedure time.In a prospective study on the effects of various conduction properties at the isthmus between tricuspid annulus and inferior vena cava following radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter, we showed previously that others than a complete bidirectional conduction block predicts a high recurrence rate of atrial flutter. For determination of transisthmal conduction properties following ablation, established mapping approaches are documentation of double potentials at the ablation line and right atrial activation sequence following posteroseptal and low lateral right atrial pacing. Novel threedimensional mapping systems, i.e., Carto® and EnSite®, may further enhance the accuracy of conventional mapping techniques.     

Catheter ablation of atrial flutter after orthotopic heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Atrial arrhythmias, including atrial flutter, are common in orthotopic heart transplant recipients. However, only a small number of individual case reports describe the electrical circuit and catheter ablation of atrial flutter after heart transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Detailed electrophysiologic evaluation and radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter were performed in three patients after orthotopic heart transplantation. All cases involved a counterclockwise flutter circuit around the tricuspid annulus. All were successfully ablated at the isthmus between the tricuspid valve and the atrial anastomosis adjacent to the inferior vena cava. CONCLUSION: Atrial flutter involving a counterclockwise circuit around the tricuspid annulus is common in the heart transplant population. Based on the patients described in this study and other cases reported in the literature, this arrhythmia often is treated successfully by ablation of the isthmus between the tricuspid valve and the atrial anastomosis near the inferior vena cava.     

Radiofrequency ablation for cure of atrial flutter

Abstract Background: Atrial flutter is a common arrhythmia which frequently recurs after cardioversion and is relatively difficult to control with antiarrhythmic agents.
Aims: To evaluate the success rate, recurrence rate and safety of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for atrial flutter in a consecutive series of patients with drug refractory chronic or paroxysmal forms of the arrhythmia.
Methods: Electrophysiologic evaluation of atrial flutter included activation mapping with a 20 electrode halo cadieter placed around the tricuspid annulus and entrainment mapping from within the low right atrial isthmus. After confirmation of the arrhythmia mechanism with these techniques, an anatomic approach was used to create a linear lesion between the inferior tricuspid annulus and the eustachian ridge at the anterior margin of the inferior vena cava. In order to demonstrate successful ablation, mapping techniques were employed to show that bi-directional conduction block was present in the low right atrial isthmus.
Results: Successful ablation was achieved in 26/27 patients (96%). In one patient with a grossly enlarged right atrium, isthmus block could not be achieved. Of the 26 patients with successful ablation, mere has been one recurrence of typical flutter (4%) during a mean follow-up period of 5.5±2.7 months. This patient underwent a successful repeat ablation procedure. Of eight patients with documented clinical atrial fibrillation (in addition to atrial flutter) prior to the procedure, five continued to have atrial fibrillation following the ablation. There were no procedural complications and all patients had normal AV conduction at the completion of the ablation.
Conclusions: RF ablation is a highly effective and safe procedure for cure of atrial flutter. In patients with chronic or recurrent forms of atrial flutter RF ablation should be considered as a first line therapeutic option.     

Typical atrial flutter ablation and the risk of postablation atrial fibrillation.

Typical atrial flutter is readily abolished by creating a line of block along the isthmus between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava. However, postablation atrial fibrillation occurs frequently, and its occurrence increases during the follow-up. Preablation atrial fibrillation is the most important risk factor for postablation atrial fibrillation occurrence. Among patients with preablation atrial fibrillation, patients with drug-induced atrial flutter present a lower risk of postablation atrial fibrillation than patients with spontaneous preablation atrial fibrillation. Patients with preablation lone atrial flutter also present a significant risk of atrial fibrillation development as time passes. Hence, they must be advised of the risk of recurrent symptoms and late atrial fibrillation, and closely followed up despite successful transisthmic ablation. Patients with atrial fibrillation after transcatheter isthmus ablation should be offered catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation, particularly if atrial fibrillation occurs despite continuation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy.     

房颤与房扑的射频消融治疗研究

目的 探讨房颤与房扑之间的相互关系，寻找房颤的射频治疗方法。方法 对40例阵发性房颤患者进行了电生理标测及射频消融。结果 40例中有6例患者发生房扑，行右房峡部消融，1例行Halo电极标测示峡部双向阻滞，随访12－30个月房颤消失或次数明显减少。结论 房颤与房扑为两种密切相关的心律失常，消融右房峡部可能对部分房颤患者起到治疗作用。     

Radiofrequenz-Katheterablation von Vorhofflattern und Vorhofflimmern

Radiofrequency catheter ablation is now considered as a curative approach in patients with typical atrial flutter. Typical atrial flutter is due to a macrore-entrant circuit within the right atrium and it can be eliminated by a linear lesion in the isthmus between the tricuspid annulus and the vena cava inferior. The electrophysiological criterion of a bidirectional isthmus block has been shown to reduce the recurrence rate of atrial flutter after catheter ablation, thus achieving long-term cure of typical atrial flutter. Acute success rates of 85 to 90% and recurrence rates of 10 to 15% have been reported. The risk of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation continues to be clinically relevant in patients who underwent successful ablation of atrial flutter, in particular in patients with previously documented atrial fibrillation. The incidence of a new onset of atrial fibrillation after ablation of atrial flutter seems to be approximately 20%. Isthmus ablation has also been shown to be beneficial for the majority of patients with typical atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation: In addition to an elimination of typical atrial flutter the isthmus ablation apparently reduces the incidence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. At present, atrial fibrillation can only be treated by catheter ablation as a curative approach in the rare cases where an accessory pathway, an AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia, typical atrial flutter or an ectopic atrial tachycardia is the induction mechanism of the atrial fibrillation. The majority of patients with atrial fibrillation is apparently not amenable to a curative local ablation. While AV junction ablation and AV node modification can palliate some of the symptoms of atrial fibrillation by a control of ventricular rate, the arrhythmia persists with the loss of AV synchrony and continued risk of thromboembolism. The surgical MAZE procedure implies a compartimentation of the atria by surgical incisions resulting in areas to small to sustain the arrhythmia. Based on this procedure experimental and clinical studies are currently performed in order to develop catheter ablation cure of atrial fibrillation.     

Atrial flutter update

Typical atrial flutter has long been considered a reentrant arrhythmia, but it is only recently that the full structure of the right atrial circuit was understood, leading to de devise of ablation techniques. Recognition of the role of functional block, based on anisotropic conduction was crucial to understanding of the flutter circuit. Anisotropy at the terminal crest creates a line of block that, with the orifices of superior and inferior vena cava, constitutes the posterior boundary of the flutter circuit. The anterior boundary is the tricuspid ring, and the circuit is a ring of myocardium made by the septal and anterior right atrial walls, linked on top by the right atrial roof and inferiorly by the inferior vena cava-tricuspid ring isthmus. This isthmus, a relatively narrow part of the circuit, has become the established target for typical flutter ablation. Complete, bidirectional isthmus block is the final goal of flutter ablation. This has to be assessed, after flutter interruption, by pacing both sides of the ablation line while recording electrogram sequences from the opposite right atrial wall and the isthmus itself. Success is great in terms of prevention of flutter recurrence, however a 30% incidence of atrial fibrillation during follow-up casts a large shadow on long-term prognosis.Understanding of the myocardial abnormalities underlying atrial flutter and fibrillation will be necessary to improve this long-term outlook.     

Conduction Properties of the Inferior Vena Cava-Tricuspid Annular Isthmus in Patients with Typical Atrial Flutter

Conduction Properties of the Annular Isthmus. Introduction : A functional region of slow conduction located in the inferior right atrium has been postulated to be critical to the induction and maintenance of typical human atrial flutter. We reexamined the potential role of functional conduction delay in the annular isthmus between the tricuspid valve and the inferior vena cava; it is within this region that such delays have been postulated to occur, and where interruption of conduction by radiofrequency energy application has been shown to eliminate typical flutter.
Methods and Results : Thirty patients with type I atrial flutter (30 counterclockwise, 14 clockwise) were studied. Counterclockwise and clockwise isthmus activation times adjacent and parallel to the tricuspid valve were measured during three conditions: (1) atrial pacing in sinus rhythm, (2) atrial flutter, and (3) entrainment of atrial flutter. During pacing in sinus rhythm at progressively shorter cycle lengths, both counterclockwise and clockwise isthmus activation times remained unchanged; decremental conduction prior to flutter induction or loss of capture was not observed. Counterclockwise isthmus activation time did not significantly differ during flutter (68 ± 23 msec), inferolateral tricuspid annulus pacing (71 ± 23 msec), or entrainment of flutter (72 ± 23 msec). Similarly, clockwise isthmus activation times did not significantly differ between flutter (65 ± 22 msec), proximal coronary sinus pacing (73 ± 21 msec), or entrainment of flutter (64 ± 15 msec).
Conclusion : Decremental conduction is not characteristic of activation through the isthmus when activation is assessed parallel and adjacent to the tricuspid annulus. Functional slowing or conduction delay does not develop in this region during typical atrial flutter.     

射频消融心房扑动拖带刺激的电生理特征

探讨射频消融心房扑动 (简称房扑 )拖带刺激的电生理特征 ,更好的理解房扑机制 ,以期提高消融成功率、减少复发率。 5例阵发性典型房扑患者 ,诱发房扑后 ,在高位、低位右房 ,冠状窦口 (CSO)及右房下部的峡部分别进行拖带刺激 ,分析心房激动顺序 ,然后进行三尖瓣环至下腔静脉之间的线性消融。 5例房扑折返环均为逆钟向旋转 ,峡部 ,高位、低位右房及CSO呈现隐匿拖带 ,左房和卵圆窝呈现显性拖带 ,平均放电 9± 6次 ,均达到右房峡部双向阻滞。CSO起搏时体表心电图Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF导联P波形态发生改变。结论 :隐匿、显性拖带对判断峡部依赖性逆钟向房扑有较高价值 ,CSO起搏时心内电图激动顺序和体表心电图P波改变可做为判断峡部消融达到双向阻滞的标志     

Influence of atrial flutter ablation on right to left inter-atrial conduction.

AIMS: Ablation of the atrial isthmus between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava changes P-wave morphology during low lateral right atrial pacing. For better understanding of the mechanism of this alteration, the sequence of activation of the inter-atrial septum and the left atrium were compared before and after ablation of the isthmus between the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid annulus. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 13 patients, left atrial mapping was performed using a duodecapolar electrode catheter advanced to the far distal coronary sinus. The inter-atrial septum was mapped using a right atrial duodecapolar electrode catheter. Conduction times were measured during low lateral right atrial pacing from the pacing artefact and during sinus rhythm from the earliest right atrial electrogram to every intra-cardiac electrogram before and after the ablation. During low lateral right atrial pacing, isthmus ablation resulted in a significant delay in every left atrial lead. Changes were maximal at the posterior aspect of the left atrium and minimal at its anterior aspect. No significant change was discernible on the inter-atrial septum. During sinus rhythm, atrial activations remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Electrocardiographic changes of P-wave morphology result from alteration in the sequence of left atrial activation rather than that of the inter-atrial septum.     

Randomized comparison of two targets in typical atrial flutter ablation

Typical atrial flutter ablation has become anatomically guided to 2 separate sites within the isthmus at the inferior right atrium: (1) between the inferior vena cava and the tricuspid annulus (anterior side of the isthmus [A]), (2) between the eustachian crest, the coronary sinus ostium and tricuspid annulus (posterior side of the isthmus [P]). We prospectively compared ablation results at these sites in 72 consecutive patients. Patients were randomized in group P or A according to the initial target site. If ablation failed at 1 site after 15 radiofrequency (RF) pulses, the other side of the isthmus was targeted. Before 15 RF pulses, complete bidirectional isthmus block was achieved in 30 of 36 group A patients and in 25 of 36 group P patients, with similar mean RF pulses number, procedure time, and fluoroscopy time. After shifting to the other target, success was finally obtained at P in 2 of 6 group A patients, and at A in 8 of 11 group P patients before a maximum of 30 RF pulses. Among successful patients, number of RF pulses, procedure time, and fluoroscopy time were significantly lower in group A (7.2 +/- 5.4 vs 11.0 +/- 8.1 pulses, p = 0.03; 131 +/- 44 vs 163 +/- 66 minutes, p = 0.03; 31 +/- 19 vs 46 +/- 24 minutes, p = 0.01, respectively). Impairment of atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction occurred in 5 patients only during ablation at P. AV block was transient in 4 patients and permanent in 1. Although atrial flutter ablation is equally effective at P and A, success seems easier to obtain when A is first targeted. Ablation at P is associated with a significant risk of AV block.     

慢传导带传导阻滞作为心房扑动消融终点的意义（附Halo导管应用一例报告）

应用Ｈａｌｏ导管标测技术，结合冠状静脉窦与希氏束电图识别心房扑动折返环的慢传导带，在下腔静脉口到三尖瓣环峡部作射频线性消融，并以慢传导带出现双向阻滞作为心房扑动消融成功的标志，治疗了１例Ｉ型心房扑动患者。随访１个月心动过速未发。由于Ｈａｌｏ导管能在右房内全面记录右房激动顺序，便于了解峡部的传导情况，在心房扑动消融中有助于明确其诱发与终止的机制，并为慢传导带传导阻滞作为成功消融终点提供了可靠的手段。     

Dual-loop intra-atrial re-entry tachycardia in a patient with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

A 65-year-old man with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (three prior coronary artery bypass surgery procedures), underwent catheter ablation for recurrent atrial flutter. Electrophysiological study initially revealed clockwise, tricuspid annulus/inferior vena cava isthmus dependent, atrial flutter. During radiofrequency energy ablation atrial flutter changed into a different atrial tachycardia without change in cycle length or interruption of the tachycardia. The new tachycardia was a right atrial free wall re-entry tachycardia. Thus the two atrial tachycardias formed a dual-loop ('figure-of-eight') re-entry circuit, possibly due to atrial scar tissue from multiple cardiac surgery procedures.     

Catheter ablation of atrial flutter due to amiodarone therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Antiarrhythmic drug treatment for atrial fibrillation can cause atrial flutter-like arrhythmias. The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of catheter ablation of the tricuspid annulus-vena cava inferior isthmus on amiodarone-induced atrial flutter and to determine the incidence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of amiodarone-induced atrial flutter in comparison to regular typical flutter. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 92 consecutive patients with typical atrial flutter who underwent isthmus ablation 28 patients had atrial flutter without a history of previous atrial fibrillation (group I), 10 patients had atrial flutter following the initiation of amiodarone therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (group II) and 54 patients had atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation (group III). Atrial cycle length during atrial flutter in amiodarone-treated patients (group II) (277+/-24 ms) was significantly longer as compared to the cycle length of atrial flutter in group I (247+/-33 ms) and group III patients (235+/-28 ms). The rate of successful transient entrainment and overdrive stimulation to sinus rhythm was not different between patients with (60%) or without amiodarone therapy (group I: 71%, group III: 53%). Successful isthmus ablation with bidirectional conduction block eliminating right atrial flutter was achieved in 90% of amiodarone-treated patients and 93% of patients without amiodarone therapy. In the amiodarone-treated patient group atrial conduction times during pacing in sinus rhythm were significantly prolonged by 20-30% before and after ablation in all regions of the reentrant circuit. During a mean follow-up of 8+/-3 months post-ablation, atrial fibrillation recurred in two of 10 patients on continued amiodarone therapy after successful isthmus ablation. Thus, successful catheter ablation of atrial flutter due to amiodarone therapy was associated with a markedly lower recurrence rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (20%) as compared to patients with atrial flutter plus preexisting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (76%) and was similar to the outcome of patients with successful atrial flutter ablation without preexisting atrial fibrillation (25%). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that isthmus ablation with bidirectional block and continuation of amiodarone therapy is an effective therapy for the treatment of atrial flutter due to amiodarone therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.     

Preliminary results with percutaneous transcatheter microwave ablation of typical atrial flutter

Background: Linear microwave ablation has been shown to be effective for treatment of atrial fibrillation during open-heart surgery by producing transmural lesions in the atrium to isolate the pulmonary veins. However, the safety and efficacy of percutaneous, transcatheter, linear microwave ablation for atrial arrhythmias, while demonstrated in animal models, is unknown in humans. Therefore, we studied the safety and efficacy of linear microwave ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) in humans with typical atrial flutter, utilizing a 2-cm long microwave antenna mounted on a steerable 9-French catheter.
Methods and Results: In seven consecutive patients, multielectrode catheters were positioned at the His bundle (quadripolar) and around the TV annulus (duo-decapolar) for pacing and recording atrial activation sequence before and after ablation. The microwave antenna was withdrawn gradually from tricuspid annulus towards inferior vena cava to ablate the CTI. Intracardiac ultrasound was used to ensure adequate endocardial contact of the microwave ablation catheter with the CTI. Microwave energy was applied at a power of 18 to 21 W at each ablation point for 120 seconds. Ablation was repeated until bidirectional CTI block was confirmed by demonstrating a descending activation wavefront in the contralateral atrial wall during pacing from the coronary sinus ostium or low lateral right atrium, respectively. Bidirectional isthmus block was achieved in all patients, after a mean number of 27.4 ± 14.7 energy applications per patients. There were no acute procedural complications.
Conclusions: Percutaneous, transcatheter microwave ablation of CTI dependent atrial flutter was demonstrated to be safe and effective in this preliminary feasibility study.     

Concealed Automaticity From an Island of Atrial Myocardium Post Cavotricuspid Ablation

Island of Atrial Myocardium Post Cavotricuspid Ablation. We report the case of a patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in whom 2 previous cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablations were performed for recurrent type I counterclockwise atrial flutter. One year after the last CTI ablation, the patient underwent pulmonary vein isolation for AF and reassessment of conduction block in the CTI was performed during the procedure. While mapping the CTI, activations were documented within the CTI that were dissociated from both right atrial and ventricular activity during sinus rhythm and pacing maneuvers. This dissociated activity was confined to a region delimited by the 2 previous ablation lines, the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava. These findings suggest that an island of atrial myocardium with automatic activity was created within the CTI by previous ablation lines. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1408‐1409, December 2010)     

Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Flutter

RF Ablation of Atrial Flutter. Activation mapping in common atrial flutter has shown circular (reentrant) activation of the right atrium around anatomic structures and areas of functional block. The direction of rotation is counterclockwise (in a frontal view), and in the low right atrium the myocardium between the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the tricuspid valve (TV) is critical to close the activation circle. The circuit can be interrupted by radiofrequency ablation of the myocardium between the TV and the IVC, and, in some cases, by ablation between the coronary sinus and TV. Flutter interruption does not mean complete isthmus ablation, as it may remain inducible, requiring further ablation. Despite attaining noninducibility, flutter may recur, and new procedures may be needed for complete ablation. Atrial fibrillation occurs in up to 30% of the cases during follow-up but is generally well controlled with antiarrhythmic drugs that were ineffective in treating flutter before ablation. Some noncommon atrial flutters show circular right atrial activation in a reversed (clockwise) direction, with the same critical areas in the low right atrium, and in these isthmus ablation is effective. Other noncommon flutters have different substrates in the right or left atrium, and mapping has to define specific critical isthmuses as ablation targets in each case. Left atrial flutter circuits remain inaccessible to ablation.     

Typical counterclockwise atrial flutter occurring despite absence of the inferior vena cava.

A 74-year-old man with a structurally normal heart presented with typical atrial flutter, after treatment of atrial fibrillation with propafenone. Catheterization and computed tomographic imaging revealed absence of the inferior vena caval segment that normally traverses the liver to enter the right atrium. Abdominal venous return occurred via the hemi-azygous vein, draining into the superior vena cava. Hepatic veins inserted postero-inferiorly into the right atrium. Pacing atrial myocardium between the hepatic veins and the tricuspid valve resulted in concealed entrainment. Radiofrequency catheter ablation directed (via a superior approach from the right internal jugular vein) to this extraordinary "isthmus" abolished atrial flutter. The implications of this congenital abnormality on posterior barriers maintaining the atrial flutter circuit are discussed.     

特发性心房颤动的电生理标测和射频线性消融治疗

研究电生理标测指导下 ,选择不同射频消融线治疗心房颤动 (简称房颤 )的可行性和有效性。 18例迷走神经介导型房颤患者经常规途径放置心内标测电极于冠状窦 (CS)、右房小梁部 (TRA)和右房平滑部 (SRA)。自发或诱发房颤后 ,连续多导同步记录CS、TRA和SRA心内双极电图 90s ,即刻回放分析上述三个部位有序房内激动波和无序房内激动波时程占所记录时间的百分比。若SRA无序激动时程 >60 %,TRA <4 0 %,作下腔静脉口至三尖瓣环后部的峡部消融线和从上腔静脉口经卵园窝及冠状窦口至下腔静脉口的间隔部消融线 (第一组 ) ;若SRA无序激动时程 <4 0 %,TRA >60 %,作峡部消融线和从上腔静脉口经右房前侧壁至下腔静脉口的游离壁消融线 (第二组 ) ;不符合上述标准者同时作峡部、游离壁及间隔部消融线 (第三组 )。消融成功标准定义为在未用或使用以前无效的抗心律失常药情况下 ,无房颤发作或每月发作少于一次且持续不超过 1min。第一组 11例 ,占总例数的 61%,术后随访7± 4个月 ,成功 8例 ,成功率 73 %。第二组 3例 ,占总例数 17%,分别随访 8,4和 11个月 ,2例成功。第三组 4例 ,占 2 2 %,术后随访 3～ 8个月 ,无一例有效。本研究结果表明 ,不同患者维系房颤的关键部位不尽相同 ,按心房内标测电图特征筛选消融部位有一定有