Cardiac resynchronization in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation: effect of upgrading to biventricular pacing after chronic right ventricular pacing

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the effects of biventricular pacing (BVP) on ventricular function, functional status, quality of life and hospitalization in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), prior atrioventricular (AV) junction ablation and right ventricular (RV) pacing performed for chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Although the benefit of BVP in CHF should theoretically extend to the patient with chronic RV pacing and AF, to our knowledge, no study has determined the effects of BVP on symptoms and ventricular function in these patients. This patient population allows for the evaluation of ventricular resynchronization independent of any BVP-induced changes on the AV interval. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with severe CHF (ejection fraction < or = 0.35, New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class III or IV), prior AV junction ablation and RV pacing performed for permanent AF of at least six months' duration were studied. Electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, functional status evaluations and quality of life surveys were completed before and at three to six months after implant. RESULTS: The NYHA functional classification improved 29% (p < 0.001). The left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction increased 44% (p < 0.001), the LV diastolic diameter decreased 6.5% (p <0.003) and the end-systolic diameter decreased 8.5% (p < 0.01). The number of hospitalizations decreased by 81% (p < 0.001). The scores on the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure survey improved by 33% (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that BVP improves the LV function and the symptoms of CHF in patients with permanent AF and chronic RV pacing. These benefits are comparable to those described for patients in sinus rhythm suggesting that BVP acts through ventricular resynchronization rather than optimization of the AV delay.     

Improved left ventricular mechanics from acute VDD pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay

BACKGROUND: Ventricular pacing can improve hemodynamics in heart failure patients, but direct effects on left ventricular (LV) function from varying pacing site and atrioventricular (AV) delay remain unknown. We hypothesized that the magnitude and location of basal intraventricular conduction delay critically influences pacing responses and that single-site pacing in the delay-activated region yields similar or better responses to biventricular pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Aortic and LV pressures were measured in 18 heart failure patients (mean+/-SD: LV ejection fraction, 19+/-7%; LV end-diastolic pressure, 25+/-8 mm Hg; QRS duration, 157+/-36 ms). Data under normal sinus rhythm were compared with ventricular pacing (VDD) at varying sites and AV delays (randomized order). Right ventricular (RV) apical or midseptal pacing had negligible contractile/systolic effects. However, LV free-wall pacing raised dP/dtmax by 23.7+/-19.0% and pulse-pressure by 18.0+/-18.4% (P<0.01). Biventricular pacing yielded less change (+12.8+/-9.3% in dP/dtmax, P<0.05 versus LV). Pressure-volume analysis performed in 11 patients consistently revealed minimal changes with RV pacing but increased stroke work and lower end-systolic volumes with LV pacing. Optimal AV intervals averaged 125+/-49 ms, and within this range, AV delay had less influence on LV function than pacing site. Basal QRS duration positively correlated with %DeltadP/dtmax (P<0.005), but pacing efficacy was not associated with QRS narrowing. Conduction delay pattern generally predicted pacing sites with most effect. CONCLUSIONS: VDD pacing acutely enhances contractile function in heart failure patients with intraventricular conduction delay. Single-site pacing at the site of greatest delay achieves similar or greater benefits to biventricular pacing in such patients. These data clarify pacing-effect mechanisms and should help in candidate identification for future studies.     

Speckle-tracking radial strain reveals left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing.

OBJECTIVES: Speckle-tracking strain analysis was used to assess the effects of permanent right ventricular (RV) pacing on the heterogeneity in timing of regional wall strain and left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown detrimental effects of RV pacing, possibly related to the induction of LV dyssynchrony. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients treated with His bundle ablation and pacemaker implantation were studied. To assess the effect of RV pacing on time-to-peak radial strain of different LV segments, we applied speckle-tracking analysis to standard LV short-axis images. In addition, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, LV volumes, and systolic function were assessed at baseline and after long-term RV pacing. RESULTS: At baseline, similar time-to-peak strain for the 6 segments was observed (mean 371 +/- 114 ms). In contrast, after a mean of 3.8 +/- 2.0 years of RV pacing, there was a marked heterogeneity in time-to-peak strain of the 6 segments. In 33 patients (57%), LV dyssynchrony, represented by a time difference > or =130 ms between the time-to-peak strain of the (antero)septal and the posterolateral segments, was present. In these patients, a deterioration of LV systolic function and NYHA functional class was observed. In 11 patients, an "upgrade" of the conventional pacemaker to a biventricular pacemaker resulted in partial reversal of the detrimental effects of RV pacing. CONCLUSIONS: Speckle-tracking analysis revealed that permanent RV pacing induced heterogeneity in time-to-peak strain, resulting in LV dyssynchrony in 57% of patients, associated with deterioration of LV systolic function and NYHA functional class. Biventricular pacing may reverse these adverse effects of RV pacing.     

Deterioration of left ventricular function following atrio-ventricular node ablation and right ventricular apical pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Transcatheter radiofrequency ablation of the atrio-ventricular (AV) node followed by ventricular pacing has been shown to improve symptoms and quality of life of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). It is assumed that function improves, but this has been less well demonstrated. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effect of AV node ablation and ventricular pacing on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with permanent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: All 12 patients studied had permanent AF for at least 12 months (mean age 70 years, range 41 to 78). LVEF was determined 6 days and 3 months after AV node ablation by radionuclide ventriculography, at a paced rate of 80 beats . min (-1). Cardiac dimensions were measured by means of transthoracic echocardiography. No major changes in pharmacological therapy were made during 3 months follow-up period. LVEF showed a significant deterioration after 3 months follow-up period for the group (47.5 +/- 14.4%; 6 days after ablation vs 43.2 +/- 13.7%; 3 months after ablation, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in left ventricular cavity dimensions directly after AV node ablation and 3 months later (LVEDD 51.2 +/- 10.7 mm vs 52.6 +/- 8.6 mm, P = NS: LVESD: 36.1 +/- 14.2 mm vs 36.6 +/- 9.7 mm, P = NS). Left atrial size did not show reduction 3 months after AV node ablation (50.8 +/- 13.6 mm vs 51.0 +/- 14.1 mm, P = NS). CONCLUSION: The restoration of a regular ventricular rhythm following AV node ablation for patients in permanent AF does not result in improvement in left ventricular function.     

The presence of contractile reserve has no predictive value for the evolution of left ventricular function following atrio-ventricular node ablation in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Transcatheter ablation of the atrio-ventricular (AV) node followed by ventricular pacing has been shown to improve symptoms and quality of life (QOL) of patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). In a considerable number of patients, cardiac function deteriorates after AV node ablation. We aimed to determine whether the absence of contractile reserve assessed by low dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LDDSE) could identify those patients whose left ventricular (LV) function deteriorates after AV node ablation. METHODS: All 25 patients studied had permanent AF for at least 12 months. LVEF was determined 6 days and 3 months after AV node ablation by radionuclide ventriculography (RNV), at a paced rate of 80 beats/min. Deterioration in cardiac function was defined as a decrease in LVEF>5%. LDSE was performed in all patients before and after ablation. The presence of contractile reserve was defined as an improvement in regional function of >or=1 grade at low dose dobutamine in at least 4 segments. QOL measurements were taken using Minnesota, NHBP and MPWB questionnaires. RESULTS: LVEF showed no improvement in the overall group (52.8+/-11.1% vs. 51.8+/-9.8%, p=NS). QOL showed significant improvement in all questionnaires (Minnesota: 4.1+/-2.1 vs. 2.5+/-2, p=0.001; NHBP: 54.8+/-43.3 vs. 34.2+/-34.3, p=0.002; MPWB: 22.2+/-4.6 vs. 19.4+/-6.2, p=0.03). There was no significant difference in change of LVEF between patients with and without contractile reserve (-0.4+/-8.7 vs. 1.6+/-11.3, p=NS). However, patients with a preserved LVEF at baseline showed more frequently a reduced LVEF after AV node ablation (62.2+/-10.4% vs. 47.5+/-7.6%, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: (1) The absence of contractile reserve does not predict deterioration of cardiac function after AV node ablation. (2) AV node ablation results in a significant improvement in QOL, which is not necessarily associated with improvement of LVEF. (3) Higher baseline LVEF predicts deterioration of cardiac function. These data suggest that although AV node ablation is an excellent way of controlling symptoms, it should be avoided in patients with normal LV function.     

Left ventricular mechanics during right ventricular apical or left ventricular-based pacing in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular junction ablation

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether left ventricular (LV) mechanics are better under LV-based pacing than under right ventricular (RV) apical pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) after atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation. BACKGROUND: "Ablate and pace" is an acceptable therapy for drug-refractory AF. However, the RV apical stimulation commonly used seems to interfere with the beneficial hemodynamic effect of regularization of heart rhythm. METHODS: The study included 12 patients (5 men, mean age 62 +/- 8.3 years), 6 with impaired and 6 with normal LV systolic function. All of them had a biventricular pacemaker system implanted and underwent atrioventricular node ablation for drug-refractory chronic AF. Using a conductance catheter, we analyzed LV pressure-volume loops during routine coronary angiography in order to evaluate short-term changes in LV mechanics during RV apical and LV-based (LV free wall or biventricular) pacing. RESULTS: Compared with RV pacing, LV-based pacing significantly improved the indexes of LV systolic function (i.e., end-systolic pressure and volume, cardiac index, stroke work, preload recruitable stroke work, maximal rate of rise of LV pressure [dP/dt(max)], LV ejection fraction, and end-systolic elastance). The LV diastolic filling indexes, end-diastolic pressure and volume, were better during LV-based pacing, whereas LV diastolic function indexes, -dP/dt(max), passive diastolic chamber stiffness, and time constant of LV isovolumic relaxation showed no clear change. CONCLUSIONS: In the short term, LV-based pacing is superior to RV apical pacing in terms of contractile function and LV filling after AVJ ablation for drug-refractory AF.     

Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts right ventricular remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to evaluate right ventricular (RV) remodeling after six months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is beneficial in patients with end-stage heart failure. The effect of CRT on RV size is currently unknown. Accordingly, the effects of CRT on RV size, severity of tricuspid regurgitation, and pulmonary artery pressure were evaluated. METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive patients with end-stage heart failure (52% ischemic cardiomyopathy), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) < or =35%, QRS duration >120 ms, and left bundle branch block were included. Clinical parameters, LV volumes, LVEF, LV dyssynchrony, and RV chamber size were assessed at baseline and after six months of CRT; LV dyssynchrony was assessed using tissue Doppler imaging. RESULTS: Clinical parameters improved significantly; LV dyssynchrony was acutely reduced after CRT and remained unchanged at six-month follow-up. Left ventricular EF improved significantly from 19 +/- 6% to 26 +/- 8% (p < 0.001), and LV end-diastolic volume decreased from 257 +/- 98 ml to 227 +/- 86 ml (p < 0.001). Right ventricular annulus decreased significantly from 37 +/- 9 mm to 32 +/- 10 mm, RV short-axis from 29 +/- 11 mm to 26 +/- 7 mm, and RV long-axis from 89 +/- 11 mm to 82 +/- 10 mm (all p < 0.001). Left ventricular and RV reverse remodeling were only observed in patients with substantial LV dyssynchrony at baseline. Finally, significant reductions in severity of tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary artery pressure were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy results in significant reverse LV and RV remodeling after six months of CRT in patients with LV dyssynchrony. Moreover, CRT leads to a reduction of the severity of tricuspid regurgitation and a decrease in pulmonary artery pressure.     

Intra-ventricular resynchronization for optimal left ventricular function during pacing in experimental left bundle branch block

oBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate to what extent intra-ventricular asynchrony (intraVA) and inter-ventricular asynchrony (interVA) determine left ventricular (LV) function in canine hearts with left bundle branch block (LBBB) during ventricular pacing. BACKGROUND: Pacing therapy improves LV pump function in patients with heart failure and abnormal ventricular conduction supposedly due to resynchronization. However, the relationship between LV pump function and measures of asynchrony is not well established. METHODS: In 15 experiments, LV (various sites) and biventricular (BiV) pacing was performed at atrioventricular (AV) delays of 20 to 140 ms. Measured were the maximum rate of increase (dP/dt(max)) of LV pressure and LV stroke work (SW) (conductance catheter), interVA (time delay between the upslope of LV and RV pressures), and intraVA (from endocardial electrical activation maps). RESULTS: Induction of LBBB increased interVA (-6.4 +/- 8.6 to -28.4 +/- 8.5 ms [RV earlier]) and intraVA (4.9 +/- 2.4 to 18.0 +/- 3.3 ms), whereas LV dP/dt(max) and SW decreased (-13 +/- 18% and -39 +/- 24%, respectively). During LBBB, LV and BiV pacing increased LV dP/dt(max) and SW (mean increases 14% to 21% and 11% to 15%, respectively) without changing diastolic function or preload. Optimal improvement in LV function was obtained consistently when intraVA returned to pre-LBBB values, while interVA remained elevated. Normalization of intraVA required AV delays shorter than the baseline PQ time during LV apex and BiV pacing, thus excluding endogenous LV activation, but AV delays virtually equal to the baseline PQ time (difference 4 +/- 9 ms, p = NS) during pacing at (mid)lateral LV sites to obtain fusion between pacing-induced and endogenous activation. CONCLUSIONS: In LBBB hearts, optimal restoration of LV systolic function by pacing requires intra-ventricular resynchronization. The optimal AV delay to achieve this depends on both the site of pacing and baseline PQ time.     

Transoesophageal left ventricular pacing in heart failure patients with permanent right ventricular pacing.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of biventricular (BV) pacing for treatment of heart failure (HF) patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) evaluated responders to BV pacing with acute transvenous left ventricular (LV) pacing and arterial pulse pressure (PP). The aim of this study was to assess transoesophageal LV pacing in evaluation of the haemodynamic response with a view to upgrading responders from permanent right ventricular (RV) pacing to BV pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten HF patients (age 62+/-8 years; one female, nine males) in NYHA III, LV ejection fraction 24+/-9% and permanent RV pacing by means of an implanted pacemaker or ICD were tested using transoesophageal LV pacing and PP. Permanently RV-paced HF patients were analysed with transoesophageal atrial sensed LV pacing in VAT mode with a different AV delay (n = 6) and with transoesophageal LV pacing in V00 mode during atrial fibrillation (n = 4). In five responders, PP was higher during transoesophageal LV pacing than PP during RV pacing (74+/-42 versus 57+/-31 mmHg, P = 0.015). Responders were upgraded by means of an LV lead via the coronary sinus in the posterior (n = 1) or posterolateral (n = 4) walls and after attaining a high LV pacing threshold with an epicardial LV lead on the anterior (n = 1) or anterolateral (n = 1) walls. NYHA class improved from 3 to 2+/-0.3 (P = 0.003) during 204+/-120 days follow-up and cardiac output increased from 4.4+/-1.5 to 5.6+/-1.7 l/min (P = 0.027) when comparing BV pacing and optimal AV delay with RV pacing. In five nonresponders, PP was not higher during transoesophageal LV pacing than during RV pacing. CONCLUSION: Transoesophageal LV pacing may be a useful technique to detect responders to BV pacing in permanently RV-paced HF patients.     

Evaluation of myocardial performance with conventional single-site ventricular pacing and biventricular pacing in a canine model of atrioventricular block

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate epicardial biventricular pacing as a means of maintaining synchronous ventricular activation in an acute canine model of AV block with normal ventricular anatomy and function. Chronic single-site ventricular pacing results in dyssynchronous ventricular activation and may contribute to ventricular dysfunction. Biventricular pacing has been used successfully in adult patients with congestive heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was an acute study of open chest mongrel dogs (n = 13). ECG, left ventricular (LV), aortic, and pulmonary arterial pressures were measured. LV impedance catheters were used to assess cardiodynamics using instantaneous LV pressure-volume relations (PVR). Following radiofrequency ablation of the AV node, a temporary pacemaker was programmed 10 beats/min above the intrinsic atrial rate, with an AV interval similar to the baseline intrinsic PR interval. The pacing protocol consisted of 5-minute intervals with the following lead configurations: right atrium-right ventricular apex (RA-RVA), RA-LV apex (LVA), and RA-biventricular using combinations of four ventricular sites (RVA, RV outflow tract [RVOT], LVA, LV base [LVB]). RA-RVA was used as the experimental control. LV systolic mechanics, as measured by the slope of the end-systolic (Ees) PVR (ESPVR, mmHg/cc), was statistically greater (P < 0.05) with all modes of biventricular pacing (RA-RVA/LVA 20.0 +/- 2.9, RA-RVA/LVB 18.4 +/- 2.9, RA-RVOT/LVA 15.1 +/- 1.8, RA-RVOT/LVB 17.6 +/- 2.9) compared to single-site ventricular pacing (RA-RVA 12.8 +/- 1.6). Concurrent with this improvement in myocardial performance was a shortening of the QRS duration (RA-RVA 97.7 +/- 2.9 vs RA-RVA/LVA 75.7 +/- 4.9, RA-RVA/LVB 70.3 +/- 4.9, RA-RVOT/LVA 65.3 +/- 4.4, and RA-RVOT/LVB 76.7 +/- 5.9, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this acute canine model of AV block, QRS duration shortened and LV performance improved with epicardial biventricular pacing compared to standard single-site ventricular pacing.     

Usefulness of echo-guided cardiac resynchronization pacing in patients undergoing "ablate and pace" therapy for permanent atrial fibrillation and effects of heart rate regularization and left ventricular resynchronization

An acute comparative study of right ventricular (RV) pacing and echocardiographically guided cardiac resynchronization pacing (CRP) was performed in patients who underwent "ablate and pace" therapy for permanent atrial fibrillation. It was hypothesized that optimized CRP guided by tissue Doppler echocardiography would exert an additive beneficial hemodynamic effect to that of rate regularization achieved through atrioventricular junction ablation. An acute intrapatient comparison of echocardiographic parameters was performed between baseline preablation values and RV pacing and CRP (performed <24 hours after ablation) in 50 patients. Optimized CRP configuration was defined as the modality of pacing corresponding to that of the shortest intra-left ventricular (LV) delay among simultaneous biventricular pacing, sequential biventricular pacing, and single-chamber pacing. The intra-LV delay was defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest activation time in the six basal segments of the left ventricle. Compared with preablation measures, the ejection fraction increased by 10.8% during RV pacing (19% in patients with intra-LV delays <47.5 ms and 3% in those with intra-LV delays >47.5 ms). Compared with RV pacing, CRP caused a 9.2% increase in the ejection fraction, a 6.8% decrease in LV systolic diameter, and a 17.3% decrease in mitral regurgitation area; LV dyssynchrony was reduced from 52 +/- 27 to 21 +/- 12 ms. Similar results were observed in patients with and without depressed systolic function and in patients with and without left bundle branch block. In conclusion, rate regularization achieved through atrioventricular junction ablation and RV pacing provides a favorable hemodynamic effect that is inversely related to the level of LV dyssynchrony. Minimizing LV dyssynchrony by means of optimized CRP yields an additional important benefit.     

Reversible left ventricular dyssynchrony and heart failure induced by right ventricular pacing

Right ventricular (RV) pacing related heart failure is reported in some patients after long term pacing. The exact mechanism is not yet clear but may be related to left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony induced by RV apical pacing. We report one case with baseline normal LV ejection fraction but complicated by heart failure and ventricular tachycardia after 4 months of pacing for complete heart block together with illustration of LV dyssynchrony demonstrated by tissue Doppler imaging.     

Left ventricular-based cardiac stimulation post AV nodal ablation evaluation (the PAVE study)

BACKGROUND: Chronic right ventricular pacing has been reported to promote cardiac dyssynchrony. The PAVE trial prospectively compared chronic biventricular pacing to right ventricular pacing in patients undergoing ablation of the AV node for management of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four patients requiring AV node ablation were randomized to receive a biventricular pacing system (n = 103) or a right ventricular pacing system (n = 81). The study endpoints were change in the 6-minute hallway walk test, quality of life, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Patient characteristics were similar (64% male; age: 69 +/- 10 years, ejection fraction: 0.46 +/- 0.16; 83%, NYHA Class II or III). At 6 months postablation, patients treated with cardiac resynchronization had a significant improvement in 6-minute walk distance, (31%) above baseline (82.9 +/- 94.7 m), compared to patients receiving right ventricular pacing, (24%) above baseline (61.2 +/- 90.0 m) (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the quality-of-life parameters. At 6 months postablation, the ejection fraction in the biventricular group (0.46 +/- 0.13) was significantly greater in comparison to patients receiving right ventricular pacing (0.41 +/- 0.13, P = 0.03). Patients with an ejection fraction 相似文献   

Tailored echocardiographic interventricular delay programming further optimizes left ventricular performance after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of cardiac resynchronization therapy is correction of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. However, little is known about the optimal timing of LV and right ventricular (RV) stimulation. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular pacing, using a range of interventricular delays in patients with advanced heart failure. METHODS: Twenty patients with dilated ischemic (n = 12) and idiopathic (n = 8) cardiomyopathy (age 66 +/- 6 years, New York Heart Association class III-IV, LV end-diastolic diameter >55 mm, ejection fraction 22% +/- 18%, and QRS 200 +/- 32 ms) were implanted with a biventricular resynchronization device with sequential RV and LV timing (VV) capabilities. Tissue Doppler echocardiographic parameters were measured during sinus rhythm before implantation and following an optimal AV interval with both simultaneous and sequential biventricular pacing. The interventricular interval was modified by advancing the LV stimulus (LV first) or RV stimulus (RV first) up to 60 ms. For each stimulation protocol, standard echocardiographic Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) echo were used to measure the LV outflow tract velocity-time integral, LV filling time, intraventricular delay, and interventricular delay. RESULTS: The highest velocity-time integral was found in 12 patients with LV first stimulation, 5 patients with RV first stimulation, and 3 patients with simultaneous biventricular activation. Compared with simultaneous biventricular pacing, the optimized sequential biventricular pacing significantly increased the velocity-time integral (P <.001) and LV filling time (P = .001) and decreased interventricular delay (P = .013) and intraventricular delay (P = .010). The optimal VV interval could not be predicted by any clinical nor echocardiographic parameter. At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of nonresponders was 10%. CONCLUSION: Optimal timing of the interventricular interval results in prolongation of the LV filling time, reduction of interventricular asynchrony, and an increase in stroke volume. In patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy, LV hemodynamics may be further improved by optimizing LV-RV delay.     

Acute and long-term effects of atrioventricular junction ablation and VVIR pacemaker in symptomatic patients with chronic lone atrial fibrillation and normal ventricular response

INTRODUCTION: The precise role of irregular ventricular response in atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been fully elucidated. This study examined the independent effects of rhythm regularity in patients with chronic AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 50 patients who had chronic lone AF and a normal ventricular rate. Among these patients, 21 who underwent AV junction ablation and implantation of a VVIR pacemaker constituted the ablation group; the other 29 patients were the medical group. Acute hemodynamic findings were measured in 21 ablation patients before ablation (during AF, baseline) and 15 minutes after ablation (during right ventricular pacing). Compared with baseline data, ablation and pacing therapy increased cardiac output (4.7 +/- 0.8 vs 5.2 +/- 0.9 L/min; P = 0.05), decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (16 +/- 5 vs 13 +/- 4 mmHg; P = 0.001), and decreased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (14 +/- 4 vs 11 +/- 3 mmHg; P < 0.05). After 12 months, the ablation group patients showed lower scores in general quality of life (-20%; P < 0.001), overall symptoms (-24%; P < 0.001), overall activity scale (-23%; P = 0.004), and significant increase of left ventricular ejection fraction (44% +/- 6% vs 49% +/- 5%; P = 0.02) by echocardiographic examination. CONCLUSION: AV junction ablation and pacing in patients with chronic AF and normal ventricular response may confer acute and long-term benefits beyond rate control by eliminating rhythm irregularity.     

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Heart Failure

Atrial fibrillation (AF) worsens outcome in patients with systolic heart failure and the presence of heart failure (HF) predicts a 5- to 6-fold increase in risk of AF. In addition to loss of atrial systole, AF may contribute to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction due a rapid ventricular rate, irregularity of rhythm and exacerbation of mitral regurgitation due to atrial dilatation. Elimination of atrial fibrillation with catheter ablation can improve ejection fraction and reduce heart failure symptoms and appears superior to AV node ablation and bi-ventricular pacing. AF ablation can restore sinus rhythm in most patients with heart failure. Additional study is warranted to identify which patients will receive maximum benefit from aggressive rhythm control and to determine efficacy in patients with diastolic heart failure.     

Effect of triangle ventricular pacing on haemodynamics and dyssynchrony in patients with advanced heart failure: a comparison study with conventional bi-ventricular pacing therapy.

AIMS: This study examined the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by triangle ventricular pacing (Tri-V) on left ventricular (LV) function and dyssynchrony. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with NYHA class III or IV heart failure were studied. For Tri-V, two right ventricular (RV) leads were connected to the CRT device via a Y-connector with one lead anchored at the RV apex and the other at the RV outflow tract. The LV lead was positioned in the posterolateral or lateral cardiac vein. CRT with standard bi-ventricular pacing (Bi-V) was performed with the RV apical and LV leads. LV function was assessed by the measurement of LV positive dp/dt (dP/dt(max)) and cardiac output (CO). LV dyssynchrony was assessed using the standard deviation of the time to peak myocardial velocity during the systolic phase in 12 LV segments (Ts-SD) derived from tissue Doppler images. In comparison to Bi-V, Tri-V increased dP/dt(max) (baseline, 746 +/- 165; Bi-V, 909 +/- 186; Tri-V, 959 +/- 195 mmHg/s, P = 0.04) and CO (baseline, 3.1 +/- 1.0; Bi-V, 3.4 +/- 1.1; Tri-V, 3.8 +/- 1.2 L/min, P < 0.001), decreased Ts-SD (baseline, 54.0 +/- 35.0; Bi-V, 33.6 +/- 15.3; Tri-V, 22.4 +/- 8.1 ms, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The acute beneficial effects of Tri-V on LV function and dyssynchrony were greater than those of Bi-V.     

Impact of acute biventricular pacing on left ventricular performance and volumes in patients with severe heart failure. A tissue doppler and three-dimensional echocardiographic study

OBJECTIVES: We used tissue velocity imaging (TVI) and three-dimensional echocardiography to evaluate the effect of acute biventricular pacing on left ventricular (LV) performance and volumes in patients with severe heart failure and bundle branch block. BACKGROUND: Biventricular pacing causes acute hemodynamic improvement in patients with severe heart failure, and QRS duration has been used as a predictor of improved resynchronization. Tissue velocity has the potential of demonstrating the degree of LV resynchronization and three-dimensional echocardiography enables accurate quantitation of LV volumes and function. METHODS: TVI and three-dimensional echocardiography were performed during sinus rhythm and biventricular pacing in 25 consecutive patients with severe heart failure. RESULTS: Biventricular pacing significantly improved the extent of contracting myocardium in synchrony by 15.4% and the duration of contraction synchrony by 17% (p < 0.05 for both). Furthermore, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes decreased by 7 +/- 4.5% and 13 +/- 6% (p < 0.01) and ejection fraction increased by 22.8 +/- 9% (p < 0.01). Baseline duration of QRS and the preejection period as well as the extent of myocardium with asynchronous contraction measured by TVI predicted pacing efficacy. In multivariate analysis, only the extent of myocardium with asynchronous contraction at the LV base predicted biventricular pacing efficacy. CONCLUSION: Biventricular pacing improves LV systolic performance and reduces LV volumes during short-term treatment. TVI provides important pathophysiological information on the degree of LV resynchronization and may contribute to improved patient selection.     

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a novel adjunct to the treatment and prevention of systemic right ventricular failure

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and hemodynamic benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with systemic right ventricle (RV). BACKGROUND: Patients with a systemic RV are at high risk of developing heart failure. Cardiac resynchronization therapy may improve RV function in those with electromechanical dyssynchrony. METHODS: Eight patients (age 6.9 to 29.2 years) with a systemic RV and right bundle-branch block (n = 2) or pacing from the left ventricle (LV) (n = 6) with a QRS interval of 161 +/- 21 ms underwent CRT (associated with cardiac surgery aimed at decrease in tricuspid regurgitation in 3 of 8 patients) and were followed-up for a median of 17.4 months. RESULTS: Change from baseline rhythm to CRT was accompanied by a decrease in QRS interval (-28.0%, p = 0.002) and interventricular mechanical delay (-16.7%, p = 0.047) and immediate improvement in the RV filling time (+10.9%, p = 0.002), Tei index (-7.7%, p = 0.008), estimated RV maximum +dP/dt(+45.9%, p = 0.007), aortic velocity-time integral (+7.0%, p = 0.028), and RV ejection fraction by radionuclide ventriculography (+9.6%, p = 0.04). The RV fractional area of change increased from a median of 18.1% before resynchronization to 29.5% at last follow-up (p = 0.008) without a significant change in the end-diastolic area (+4.0%, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: The CRT yielded improvement in systemic RV function in patients with spontaneous or LV pacing-induced electromechanical dyssynchrony and seems to be a promising adjunct to the treatment and prevention of systemic RV failure.     

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation versus atrioventricular junction ablation plus pacing therapy for elderly patients with medically refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become another nonpharmacologic therapeutic option for medically refractory paroxysmal AF. Whether this method is better than atrioventricular (AV) junction ablation plus pacing therapy is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the very long-term (longer than 4 years) clinical outcomes of the 2 methods in elderly patients (>65 years old) with medically refractory paroxysmal AF. METHODS: From January 1995 to December 2001, 71 elderly patients with medically refractory paroxysmal AF were included; group 1 included 32 patients with successful AV junction ablation plus pacing therapy and group 2, 37 patients with successful catheter ablation of AF. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of more than 52 months, the AF was better controlled in the group 1 patients than group 2 (100% vs 81%, P = 0.013), however, they had a significantly higher incidence of persistent AF (69% vs 8%, P < 0.001) and heart failure (53% vs 24%, P = 0.001). Furthermore, the incidence of ischemic stroke and cardiac death was similar between the 2 groups. Compared with the preablation values, a significant increase in the NYHA functional class (1.7 +/- 0.9 vs 1.4 +/- 0.7, P = 0.01) and significant decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (44 +/- 8% vs 51 +/- 10%, P = 0.01) were noted in the group 1 patients, but not in the group 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although AV junction ablation plus pacing therapy better controlled the AF in elderly patients with medically refractory paroxysmal AF, that method was associated with a higher incidence of persistent AF and heart failure than catheter ablation of AF in the very long-term follow-up.