General principles of hepatectomy in colorectal liver metastases

Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases remains the only therapeutic option that improves long-term survival and offers potential cure. By conventional resectability criteria, only a limited number of patients with metastatic disease can be subjected to surgical intervention. In the past decade, better understanding of the natural history of the disease, the introduction of new chemotherapy agents and the advances in surgical techniques have led to more patients being eligible for surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the size of the metastases, allowing operation on patients who were previously considered inoperable. Major resections can nowadays be safely performed with the development of new less-invasive techniques and with the use of supplementary tools like ablation techniques. Using portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of future liver remnant and combining it with two-staged hepatectomy allow more patients with advanced disease to undergo potentially curative surgery. Careful selection of patients and aggressive surgery in experienced centers improve survival rates.     

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in relation to surgery for colorectal liver metastases

Liver resection is associated with prolonged survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. At diagnosis, 15-20% of patients have resectable colorectal liver metastases whereas other patients have too advanced disease to enable surgical treatment and receive chemotherapy. In patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases, disease relapse occurs in up to 70%. Therefore, a combined approach including preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy or both has been tested to improve outcome after surgery. In patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases, chemotherapy is initially the sole treatment option. The considerable improvement of the efficacy of anticancer agents has contributed to increase the response rate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. In case of major response to chemotherapy, surgery with curative intent can be offered to patients with initially unresectable liver metastases.     

Resection and local therapy for liver metastases

In 30-50% of patients the liver is a preferred site of distant disease for many malignant tumours. Due to the high incidence, most of the available data relate to metastases arising from colorectal primaries. Surgical resection is at present the only treatment offering potential cure. The achievable 5-year survival rate is 30%. However, only 10-15% of patients with colorectal liver metastases can undergo potentially curative liver resection. Therefore, accurate staging is an important prerequisite in selecting patients who would benefit from surgery. Recurrence of hepatic metastases after potentially curative resection occurs in up to 60% of the cases. Results demonstrate that re-resection of liver metastases can provide long-term survival rates in a carefully selected group of patients without extrahepatic disease. Because of the high rate of recurrences following an apparently curative resection several authors investigated the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (systemic, intraportal, and hepatic arterial infusion). Until recently none had shown effectiveness. Pre-operative chemotherapy seems to be a promising approach in patients with liver metastases initially considered unsuitable for radical surgery. Recently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been proposed as an alternative approach to conventional surgery as initial management with the aim of improving the results in resectable liver metastases. Interventional strategies (ethanol injection, cryosurgery, laser-induced thermotherapy, radio-frequency ablation) and combined modalities (surgical/interventional) are additive methods which may help to improve treatment results in the future.     

结直肠癌肝转移外科治疗的共识与争议

结直肠癌肝转移是导致结直肠癌患者死亡的主要原因。目前,循证医学证据表明手术切除是结直肠癌肝转移患者有效且可能获得长期生存的惟一治疗方式。随着外科技术尤其是微创外科技术的进步,越来越多的患者可从外科手术中获益。化学药物的发展以及贝伐单抗和西妥昔单抗等靶向药物的应用,使不可切除的结直肠癌肝转移转化为可切除,从而使更多患者获得治愈的机会。对于无法根治性切除的患者,外科手术联合射频治疗的方法可延长生存期。多学科合作团队诊治模式的广泛应用,使结直肠癌肝转移的治疗更加精准。     

Practical questions in liver metastases of colorectal cancer: general principles of treatment

Liver metastases of colorectal cancer are currently treated by multidisciplinary teams using strategies that combine chemotherapy, surgery and ablative techniques. Many patients classically considered non-resectable can now be rescued by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver resection, with similar results to those obtained in initial resections. While many of those patients will recur, repeat resection is a feasible and safe approach if the recurrence is confined to the liver. Several factors that until recently were considered contraindications are now recognized only as adverse prognostic factors and no longer as contraindications for surgery. The current evaluation process to select patients for surgery is no longer focused on what is to be removed but rather on what will remain. The single most important objective is to achieve a complete (R0) resection within the limits of safety in terms of quantity and quality of the remaining liver. An increasing number of patients with synchronous liver metastases are treated by simultaneous resection of the primary and the liver metastatic tumours. Multilobar disease can also be approached by staged procedures that combine neoadjuvant chemotherapy, limited resections in one lobe, embolization or ligation of the contralateral portal vein and a major resection in a second procedure. Extrahepatic disease is no longer a contraindication for surgery provided that an R0 resection can be achieved. A reverse surgical staged approach (liver metastases first, primary second) is another strategy that has appeared recently. Provided that a careful selection is made, elderly patients can also benefit from surgical treatment of liver metastases.     

Liver metastases

Opinion Statement Liver metastases, especially from colorectal primary cancers, are treatable and potentially curable. Imaging techniques such as CT, MRI, and sonography have advanced in recent years and led to increased sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of liver metastases. Liver surgery also has been revolutionized in the past two decades. Dissections along nonanatomic lines have permitted the resection of multiple lesions that previously might have been considered unresectable. We regard resection of a solitary hepatic metastasis or up to four metastases from colorectal carcinoma as the best treatment for this condition. In patients over 70 years of age and those with medical conditions preventing surgery, we endorse expectant follow-up as long as the tumor remains stable. But if the tumor begins growing rapidly and local techniques cannot be used, we consider systemic chemotherapy. In patients with progressive metastatic liver disease, we initiate systemic therapy or hepatic arterial infusion. In young patients with metastatic disease, even when the disease is indolent or symptomatic, it may be difficult not to treat. We use either local regional therapy (resection or regional infusion) or systemic chemotherapy followed by regional therapy. In patients with neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver, the first approach we use is not to treat because there may be a long period of stable disease. We use Sandostatin (Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) to treat symptoms. If the tumor progresses and symptoms cannot be controlled, these vascular tumors can be treated by embolization or chemoembolization, with high expectations of response. Newer approaches to liver metastases such as cryosurgery, chemoembolization, and interstitial radiation are also available. Cryosurgery is an ablative procedure that has not been proven yet to be as effective as surgical removal of metastases. However, in a situation where surgery cannot be performed, cryosurgery is an alternative. Chemoembolism has not been proven to be more effective than systemic therapy for liver metastases, but it allows another regional approach. External localized radiation can be used for patients who fail first-line treatment or in new protocols to delineate its value, perhaps in concert with chemotherapy. We also consider offering external localized radiation in patients who fail first-line treatment, perhaps in concert with chemotherapy. The usefulness of these techniques compared with surgery or regional therapy is being investigated.     

结直肠癌肝转移的综合治疗策略

结直肠癌(colorectal cancer,CRC)是世界上常见的消化道肿瘤之一,约有50%的患者最终出现肝转移。对于发生肝转移的患者,若不经治疗,中位生存期仅为6.9个月,5年生存率为0。若肝脏转移灶行根治性手术,则中位生存期为35个月,5年生存率为30～50%,因此手术切除仍是结直肠癌肝转移治疗的首选。对于同时性肝转移的患者,若无肠道梗阻、穿孔、出血等症状,笔者倾向于同时性切除原发灶和转移灶,术中联合应用B超探查、微波、射频等新技术来提高切除率,降低复发率。而临床上只有少部分患者(10%～15%)可以行手术治疗。对于不可切除的肝转移灶,需通过多学科讨论,针对疾病某一时期,制定出详细的个体化综合性治疗方案,如术前新辅助化疗、联合靶向药物治疗、门静脉栓塞术的应用、局部治疗、放疗等,使得一些不可切除的病灶转化为可切除病灶。因此癌肿作为一项全身性疾病,单纯依靠一种治疗手段很难取得理想的效果,需要多学科的合作,通过对疾病的不同时期进行认识、讨论,以便找到针对某一时间段疾病的最佳治疗方法。同时术后需要定期复查及时发现复发和转移以及制定进一步治疗计划,从而提高患者的长期生存率及生活质量。     

Time to think: Selecting patients who may benefit from synchronous resection of primary pancreatic cancer and liver metastases

Pancreatic cancer remains a lethal disease and is associated with poor prognosis, particularly for patients with distant metastasis at diagnosis. Recently, Oweira reported a retrospective study that included 13233 metastatic pancreatic cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. They demonstrated that pancreatic cancer patients with isolated liver metastases had worse outcomes than patients with isolated lung metastases or distant nodal metastases. At present, the standard treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer is chemotherapy. However, improvement in the safety of pancreatic surgery has led to the consideration of more aggressive surgical approaches. Schneitler reported two cases of hepatic metastatic pancreatic cancer in which negative margin(R0) resection and long survival were achieved after effective preoperative chemotherapy. In general, these two studies indicate that although pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis have a poor prognosis, surgical approaches may prolong survival for a few of these patients. A strategy to select hepatic metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who may benefit from surgical intervention is urgently needed.     

Current treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

The liver is the commonest site of distant metastasis of colorectal cancer and nearly half of the patients with colorectal cancer ultimately develop liver involved during the course of their diseases. Surgery is the only therapy that offers the possibility of cure for patients with hepatic metastatic diseases. Five-year survival rates after resection of all detectable liver metastases can be up to 40 %. Unfortunately, only 25 % of patients with colorectal liver metastases are candidates for liver resection, while the others are not amenable to surgical resection. Regional therapies such as radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy may be offered to patients with isolated unresectable metastases but no extrahepatic diseases. Hepatic artery catheter chemotherapy and chemoembolization and portal vein embolization are often used for the patients with extensive liver metastases but without extrahepatic diseases, which are not suitable for regional ablation. For the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer beyond the liver, systemic chemotherapy is a more appropriate choice. Immunotherapy is also a good option when other therapies are used in combination to enhance the efficacy. Selective internal radiation therapy is a new radiation method which can be used in patients given other routine therapies without effects.     

Role of surgery in colorectal cancer liver metastases

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third most common cancer, and approximately 35%-55% of patients with CRC will develop hepatic metastases during the course of their disease. Surgical resection represents the only chance of long-term survival. The goal of surgery should be to resect all metastases with negative histological margins while preserving sufficient functional hepatic parenchyma. Although resection remains the only chance of long-term survival, management strategies should be tailored for each case. For patients with extensive metastatic disease who would otherwise be unresectable, the combination of advances in medical therapy, such as systemic chemotherapy (CTX), and the improvement in surgical techniques for metastatic disease, have enhanced prognosis with prolongation of the median survival rate and cure. The use of portal vein embolization and preoperative CTX may also increase the number of patients suitable for surgical treatment. Despite current treatment options, many patients still experience a recurrence after hepatic resection. More active systemic CTX agents are being used increasingly as adjuvant therapy either before or after surgery. Local tumor ablative therapies, such as microwave coagulation therapy and radiofrequency ablation therapy, should be considered as an adjunct to hepatic resection, in which resection cannot deal with all of the tumor lesions. Formulation of an individualized plan, which combines surgery with systemic CTX, is a necessary task of the multidisciplinary team. The aim of this paper is to discuss different approaches for patients that are treated due to CRC liver metastasis.     

Current status of surgery in colorectal metastases to the liver

The prime role of hepatic resection in the management of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver is firmly established. The evolution of surgical and anaesthetic techniques has dramatically reduced the morbidity and mortality of elective liver resection in the hands os specialist hepatobiliary surgical teams. At least a third of patients who undergo liver resection for colorectal metastases can expect to survive five years. Although only 10-20% of all patients presenting with colorectal liver metastases are suitable for surgery, novel strategies such as portal vein embolisation and downstaging chemotherapy promise to increase the proportion of eligible patients.     

The role of surgery in the treatment of liver metastases for colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver metastases deriving from colorectal cancer can be treated with curative intention in a select number of patients. Controversy does, however, persist pertaining to the impact of adjuvant treatment strategies. The aim of this study is to elucidate upon the various treatment modalities for patients suffering from liver metastases of colorectal primary tumor as well as to provide a rationale for surgical and adjuvant treatment. METHODOLOGY: From November 1987 to September 1998, a total of 449 consecutive patients suffering from liver metastases deriving from a colorectal cancer were documented at our institution in a prolective study. Prognostic factors providing the most beneficial outcome (whether with surgical and/or adjuvant treatment modalities) were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Whenever possible, curative (R0) surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases provides the most benefit to the patient. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor infiltration of the lymph nodes of the hepatoduodenal ligament and metachronous occurrence of liver metastases as most independent factors related to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant post-operative chemotherapy fails to significantly improve survival following resection of liver metastases when compared to the liver resection only group. In patients with unresectable metastases, regional arterial chemotherapy did not improve survival significantly when compared with systemic chemotherapy.     

Successful outcome after combined chemotherapeutic and surgical management in a case of esophageal cancer with breast and brain relapse

INTRODUCTION Esophageal cancer (EC) is a highly lethal disease, with an estimated annual incidence of 14 550 new cases and 13 770 related deaths in 2006 in the USA[1]. Approximately 50% of patients present with metastatic disease and most patients with lo…     

Cytoreductive surgery in advanced endocrine tumours of the pancreas

Surgery still plays an important role even in advanced endocrine tumours of the pancreas, owing to their biological behaviour. Sometimes it is possible to attempt a radical approach, but more often only cytoreduction is feasible. In fact, when the malignancy is not completely resectable on account of vessel involvement or extensive liver metastases, surgical reduction of the tumour burden (debulking) can be proposed, aimed at improving the clinical conditions and survival of these patients. Forty-one patients suffering from advanced endocrine tumour of the pancreas were observed from 1985 to 1996. In 13 patients, the disease was locally advanced as far as concerns lymph node metastases and/or vessel involvement, while the other 28 patients presented liver metastases. In the former group, we performed 6 radical resections, in the latter we submitted 2 patients to radical resection and 12 patients to cytoreductive surgery, with complete removal of the pancreatic malignancy. The overall survival of the resected patients was 87% (7/8). Three patients (37.5%) are alive and free of disease, while the other 4 have subsequently developed liver metastases. One patient died with hepatic recurrence. Half the patients (6/12) undergoing cytoreductive surgery are alive, 3 with stable and 3 with progressive disease. The other 6 patients have died due to liver progression of the disease. As data in the literature concerning the role of debulking as regards the survival are conflicting, we have modified our surgical approach in patients with advanced disease. We perform cytoreductive surgery whenever complete removal of the pancreatic tumour is feasible. The rationale of this approach is to leave only a liver with residual disease, with a view to giving targeted adjuvant treatment.     

Disappearing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: impact of modern imaging modalities

BackgroundChemotherapy is often used before a resection for colorectal liver metastases. After chemotherapy, metastases may disappear on cross sectional imaging but residual metastatic disease may still exist. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of new advancements in imaging technology such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with liver specific contrast (Gd EOB DTPA) and contrast enhanced intra operative ultrasound (CE IOUS) on disappearing liver metastases (DLM).MethodsTwenty nine patients with one or more DLM undergoing surgical exploration were included. Pre operative imaging consisted of contrast enhanced multi detector computed tomography (MDCT) and/or MRI with liver specific contrast. At surgery, CE IOUS was used when tumours known from pre chemotherapy imaging were not found by inspection or intra operative ultrasound.ResultsPatients presented 66 DLM. At surgical exploration, 42 DLM were identified and treated (64%). CE IOUS detected one additional DLM not found by intra operative ultrasound. For metastases ≤10 mm on histological analysis, imaging sensitivities for MRI and MDCT before surgery but after chemotherapy were 26/49 (53%) and 24/66 (36%), respectively.ConclusionA majority of DLM are identified during surgery using intra operative ultrasound, with only little additional value of CE IOUS. The sensitivities of post chemotherapy imaging modalities for small metastases are low in the setting of DLM. For surgical planning, an optimized pre chemotherapy imaging is essential.     

Surgery and chemotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma, arising from bile duct epithelium, is categorized into intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC), including hilarcholangiocarcinoma. Recently, there has been a worldwide increase in the incidence and mortality from ICC. Complete surgical resection is the only approach to cure the patients with ICC. However, locoregional extension of these tumors is usually advanced with intrahepatic and lymph-node metastases at the time of diagnosis. Resectability rates are quite low and variable (18%-70%). The five-year survival rate after surgical resection was reported to be 20%-40%. Median survival time after ICC resection was 12-37.4 mo. Only a small number of ICC cases, accompanied with ECC, gall bladder carcinoma, and ampullary carcinoma, have been reported in the studies of chemotherapy due to the rarity of the disease. However, in some reports, significant anti-cancer effects were achieved with a response rate of up to 40% and a median survival of one year. Although recurrence rate after hepatectomy is high for the patients with ICC, the residual liver and the lung are the main sites of recurrence after tentative curative surgical resection. Several patients in our study had a long-term survival with repeated surgery and chemotherapy. Repeated surgery, combined with new effective regimens of chemotherapy, could benefit the survival of ICC patients.     

Treatment strategy for colorectal cancer with resectable synchronous liver metastases:Is any evidence-based strategy possible?

Fifteen percent to twenty-five percent of patients affected by colorectal cancer presents with liver metastases at diagnosis. In resectable cases, surgery is the only potentially curative treatment and achieves survival rates up to 50% at 5 years. Management is complex, as colorectal resection, liver resection, chemotherapy, and, in locally advanced mid/low rectal tumors, radiotherapy have to be integrated. Modern medical practice usually relies on evidence-based protocols. Levels of evidence for synchronous metastases are poor:published studies include few recent prospective series and several retrospective analyses collecting a limited number of patients across long periods of time. Data are difficult to be generalized and are mainly representative of single centre’s experience, biased by local recruitment, indications and surgical technique. In this context, surgeons have to renounce to "evidence-based medicine" and to adopt a sort of "experience-based medicine". Anyway, some suggestions are possible. Simultaneous colorectal and liver resection can be safely performed whenever minor hepatectomies are planned, while a case-by-case evaluation is mandatory in case of more complex procedures. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is preferentially scheduled for patients with advanced metastatic tumors to assess disease biology and to control lesions. It can be safely performed with primarytumor in situ , even planning simultaneous resection at its end. Locally advanced mid/low rectal tumor represents a further indication to neoadjuvant therapies, even if treatment’s schedule is not yet standardized. In summary, several issues have to be solved, but every single HPB centre should define its proper strategy to optimize patient’s selection, disease control and safety and completeness of surgery.     

Simultaneous surgery for primary colorectal cancer and metastatic lesions?

Approximately 20-25% of patients with colorectal cancer present with liver metastases at the time of diagnosis. Traditionally, resection of the primary tumor has been advocated in order to prevent complications of the primary tumor colorectal cancer in patients with synchronous liver metastases. The published data concerning long-term prognosis in this group of patients are discordant. Although some of the reports show survival benefits from resection of the primary tumor, these studies are retrospective with small number of patients and using single drug chemotherapy. For patients with resectable liver metastases, new studies indicate that progression-free survival is best in patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy. In patients with synchronous nonresectable liver metastases and colorectal cancer, there is no published prospective randomized study comparing initial surgery of the primary tumor with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, recent publications show that in patients receiving chemotherapy based on oxaliplatin or irinotecan combined with targeted treatments, the complications associated with the primary tumor are less than 10%. The conclusion should be that today prophylactic surgery of asymptomatic primary colorectal cancer in patients with liver metastases cannot be recommended.     

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment and prevention of peritoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis

PURPOSE: The treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis and sarcomatosis has been associated with long-term disease-free survival. Recently, new intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens used in patients with small volume peritoneal implants have shown benefits. METHODS: After removal of all but minimal residual disease, the abdominal cavity is flooded with a large volume of fluid containing full systemic doses of chemotherapy. Adenocarcinoma patients receive mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil; sarcoma patients receive cisplatin and doxirubicin. RESULTS: Long-term disease-free survival is seen in patients with low-grade malignancy, no lymph node or liver metastases, and a complete cytoreduction. CONCLUSIONS: If patients can be treated early when the volume of peritoneal surface cancer is low or if the patient can be made disease free by surgery, then intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be expected to achieve long-term disease-free survival in a majority of selected patients.     

Development of chemotherapy and significance of conversion surgery after chemotherapy in unresectable pancreatic cancer

While surgery currently remains the only potentially curative treatment available for pancreatic cancer, only 20% to 30% of patients have resectable disease at diagnosis. Recently, with the introduction of intensive chemotherapy regimens such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel, for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer, the antitumor activity and overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer have dramatically improved. These advances in intensive chemotherapy have led to the possibility of conversion of unresectable disease to resectable disease, and it has been reported that more than 20% of pancreatic cancer patients with unresectable locally advanced disease at diagnosis undergo successful conversion surgery after FOLFIRINOX therapy. In metastatic pancreatic cancer, resection for the primary lesion of pancreatic cancer may show some benefits for some patients with complete resolution of metastases by chemotherapy. Furthermore, surgical resection in some patients with only a few metastases, so‐called oligometastases, have also been reported. Conversion surgery is becoming increasingly possible with the introduction of intensive chemotherapies, however, the actual clinical benefits of resection in such cases has not yet been sufficiently investigated. The long‐term safety, feasibility and outcomes still need to be investigated in well‐designed, multi‐institutional studies on a large number of patients.