A dosimetric intercomparison of brachytherapy facilities in Ireland, Scotland and the North of England.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A dosimetric intercomparison of brachytherapy remote afterloading units in Ireland, Scotland and the North of England has been carried out involving 9 radiotherapy centres, and sampling 5 HDR and 6 LDR units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Absolute calibrations have been performed in air on both HDR and LDR sources. The results are expressed in terms of a ratio of local to calibrated value. Frequency distributions were obtained for the multi-source LDR units by individually measuring each source. Using these distributions the effect of non-uniform source strength on the dose rate at Manchester point A was assessed for a typical clinical brachytherapy insertion for carcinoma of the cervix. Both frequency and dose rate distribution curves were modeled using normal statistics and characterised in terms of the mean (mu) and standard deviation (sigma). RESULTS: Evaluation of the HDR units indicated a mean ratio of 1.008 (+/-0.01) while for LDR the mean ratio was 0.997 (+/-0.02). The LDR frequency distributions demonstrated a variation of sigma values extending from 1.4 to 3.0% of mu. It was shown that this non-uniformity in source strength introduced an uncertainty in the treatment planning process of between 0.8 and 1.8% when compared to the assumption of uniform source strength. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this intercomparison indicate dosimetric consistency between centres for both LDR and HDR units. The distribution of LDR source strengths were within expected limits and the resultant dose rate distributions were considered clinically acceptable.     

Reconstruction accuracy of a dedicated localiser for filmless planning in intra-operative brachytherapy

Background and purpose: With the use of HDR and PDR afterloaders containing a single stepping source, brachytherapy dose distributions can be optimised by varying the source dwell time. With the goal of implementing ‘conformal brachytherapy’, i.e. ensuring that the dose distribution conforms as accurately as possible to the target volume, we evaluated a set-up which enabled on-line implant localisation and dose planning during implantation.Materials and methods: The set-up, designated as an integrated brachytherapy unit (IBU), consists of a shielded operating room equipped with an HDR afterloader and a dedicated brachytherapy localiser connected to a treatment planning computer. The localiser is isocentric and has an extra degree of freedom in comparison to conventional simulators (i.e. an L-arm in combination with a C-arm) and enables viewing of the implant from any direction. A reconstruction algorithm which takes into account both rotation axes, i.e. the L-arm and C-arm angle, was developed for the localiser. The reconstruction procedure was tested by using the IBU localiser to measure the reconstruction accuracy with a phantom (containing 25 markers at well defined positions) and using reconstruction from radiographs. These results were compared to simulations where the accuracy of reconstruction was determined as a function of the reconstruction angle and the accuracy of read-outs of the localiser settings. On-line localisation and dose planning during implantation is based on filmless planning, i.e. fluoroscopy images and the corresponding localiser settings are imported into the treatment planning computer during implantation. The accuracy of filmless planning was determined using fluoroscopy images in the same set-up as for the experiments with the radiographs. The effect of reconstruction inaccuracies on the total irradiation time and the dose in target or normal tissue points was elucidated for clinically relevant implant geometries. T0he treatment plans of two phantoms based on reconstruction from films as well as fluoroscopy images were compared with plans for implants defined by exact co-ordinates.Results: The average reconstruction error due to the accuracy of the read-out of the localiser settings varied between −0.18 and 0.24 mm, with a standard deviation (arising from digitisation errors) ranging from 0.11 to 0.22 mm. Using filmless reconstruction and the 10 inch field of view of the image intensifier (without applying correction for the geometric distortions) the average reconstruction error ranged from 0.01 to 0.65 mm, and the standard deviation ranged from 0.40 to 0.73 mm. These errors arose as a consequence of the finite pixel size and geometric distortions. These limited errors did not influence the treatment time for clinical implant geometries and had only a minor effect (< 1%) on the dose in markers during filmless planning.Conclusion: This IBU set-up, with a dedicated brachytherapy localiser, allows for a rapid and accurate filmless planning procedure based on implant localisation from fluoroscopy images.     

宫颈癌高低剂量率^137铯腔内后装放疗的比较

回顾性分析高剂量率（HDR）和低剂量率（LDR）腔内后装治疗宫颈癌。LDR组采用我院1979年6月～1984年12月137铯腔内后装放射治疗子宫颈癌862例。HDR组采用我院1986年12月至1987年7月137铯腔内后装治疗宫颈癌135例。结果：5年存活率HDR组低於LDR组；Ⅱ级放射性直肠炎HDR组为13．0％，低於LDR组22．6％（P＜0．01）。两组Ⅱ、Ⅲ期患者中无癌存活5年以上者宫旁A点吸收剂量比值（HDR／LDR）为0．53～0．54。结论：此剂量率转换系数对指导临床实践有参考价值。     

Present and future in brachytherapy--from the discovery of radium to the 21st century]

Brachytherapy can deliver high doses of radiation to a tumor with only low doses to the normal tissue. Brachytherapy can be classified as intracavitary, intraluminar and interstitial radiotherapy. It can be also divided into three groups according to dose rate: low (LDR), medium (MDR) and high (HDR) dose rates. In recent years, HDR remotely controlled afterloading systems are widespread in Japan. HDR brachytherapy has solved the problem of radiation exposure for medical staff, and patients need not be isolated in highly sealed rooms. Local control rates of T1 and T2 tongue cancer treated with LDR interstitial radiation using 226Ra and 192Ir were 80% and 67%. A phase III trial of HDR versus LDR interstitial brachytherapy for early tongue cancer revealed the same local control rates between the two groups. For uterine cervix cancer, the cause-specific survival rates of patients treated with HDR intracavitary brachytherapy were almost the same as those treated with LDR. HDR brachytherapy can be applied against recurrent tumors. Almost half of recurrent tumors can be controlled with HDR treatment. Brachytherapy is widely used for prostate cancer in the USA. LDR brachytherapy using 125I seeds is used for prostate cancer. In Japan, 125I seeds can not be used because of the regulation of radioisotopes, so we treat prostate cancer patients with HDR brachytherapy. The two-year biochemical NED rate is 83%. Brachytherapy has a long history of nearly 100 years. In recent years, the development of an HDR remotely controlled afterloading system and treatment planning system allows us to make a precise treatment plan and a uniform dose distribution. In the next century, HDR-brachytherapy will continue to play an important role in the field of radiotherapy.     

Patterns of care for brachytherapy in Europe results in Spain

Introduction In 2003 ESTRO began a project whose primary objective, was to make a map in the European area of infrastructures in technology and personnel for brachytherapy. Material and method A survey and a web site were elaborated. The survey was sent to the 76 Spanish Radiation Oncology departments in May 2003. Results By the end of 2003, 66 (86.8%) services had responded, 40 (71.4%) of which had brachytherapy. The services with brachytherapy treated 73.5% of the total patients, an average of 1,119 patients. The mean number of patients treated with brachytherapy by department was 135.5 and the number of applications was 265 annually. The average number of specialists was 7, 4 of them trained in brachytherapy. The average weekly work load of the radiation oncologists, physicists, and technician was 22.6 h, 13.8 h and 21.0 h, respectively. The mean time dedicated to each patient by radiation oncologists, physicists and technicians was 9.2 h; 6.19 h; 7.2 h, respectively. The total number of afterloaders was 43 (22 HDR, 18 LDR, 3 PDR). The tumours most frequently treated with brachytherapy were gynaecological (56.24%), breast (14.2%) and prostate (11.7%). High dose rate was used in 47.46% of the patients and low dose rate in 47.24%. Between 1997 and 2002 there was an increase of 50.53% in patients treated with brachytherapy. Conclusions The survey shows the brachytherapy resources and activy in Spain up to 2003. Increased use of brachytherapy in prostate tumours, prevalence of gynaecology brachytherapy and similar number of treatments with HDR and LDR are demonstrated in the Patterns of Care of Brachytherapy in Europe (PCBE) study in Spain.     

How to Optimize Therapeutic Ratio in Brachytherapy of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma?

Considerable experience has been accumulated with low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx, 4 cm or less in diameter. Recent analysis of large clinical series provided data indicating that modalities of LDR brachytherapy should be optimized in treating these tumours for increasing therapeutic ratio. LDR brachytherapy is now challenged by high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy and pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy. Preliminary results obtained with the last two modalities are discussed in comparison with those achieved with LDR brachytherapy.     

The trail of the development of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer in Japan

The differences in radiotherapeutic treatment systems for cervical cancer between the United States and Japan can be attributed either to the tolerance of high-risk organs, or dosimetry itself. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is the standard treatment for uterine cervix carcinoma in Japan. In addition, HDR Co-60 afterloading machines have been gradually replaced with Ir-192 micro-source afterloading machines during the past ten years. This implies that it has now become impossible to conduct a prospective comparative study of HDR versus low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer in Japan. An examination of the history of HDR intracavitary radiotherapy for uterine cervix carcinoma in Japan led us to the conclusion that HDR intracavitary brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer is as effective as LDR intracavitary brachytherapy in terms of both survival and complications. In Japan, studies on the former can be drawn from a long experience of more than 35 years.     

Role of interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of malignant disease.

Interstitial brachytherapy was first applied using radium needles, with minimum protection of physicians and nurses. Modern techniques involve the use of radionuclide (192)Ir as the source used in computer-controlled remote afterloading machines, which can deliver a high dose rate (HDR). Treatment planning is also undertaken with the use of computers and anatomical cross-section images using CT, ultrasound and MRI. This review presents these modern techniques for tumors of a series of body sites: prostate, head and neck, breast, bladder, brain, and for soft-tissue sarcomas. Low dose rate (LDR) interstitial brachytherapy techniques are also included in this review since in some body sites there is a choice between HDR and LDR.     

Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy

Pulsed dose rate (PDR) is a new modality for dose delivery in brachytherapy. It uses modern afterloading technology (miniaturized source, cable driven, software controlled), with source activities in the range of 1 Ci, which is actually one tenth of the normal activity used for high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Modern technology allows dose optimization, and source strength in the above-mentioned range creates a new dose rate condition. For small fractions (pulses) with short interpulse intervals, PDR mimics the radiobiology of high dose rate brachytherapy, whereas for bigger doses per fraction, dose adjustments are needed to compensate for the loss of therapeutic ratio. Clinical series showed good figures for local control and toxicity. Almost every clinical site has been reported to have been treated with PDR, with some thousand of patients having been reported. Technical difficulties in some body sites can be overcome by slightly modifying the implant technique. PDR brachytherapy is an ideal environment for the development of new dose fractionation schedules. It creates unique conditions in which to operate. Knowledge of tissue repair kinetics is extremely important for adequate selection of dose per pulse and interpulse interval. Therapeutic ratio can be improved by adjusting interpulse intervals to the repair half-times for normal tissues. On the other hand, superfractionated schedules with low dose per pulse can be explored in conditions of tumor hypoxia, thanks to the predicted hypersensitivity at low dose per fraction. The use of chemical agents (nicotinamide and others) in concomitance with this superfractionated schedules is foreseen in controlled clinical trials. In conclusion, PDR brachytherapy can be considered a new paradigm for dose delivery. It is safe and reliable, can be used in the setting of image-guided radiation therapy, and exploit the differential effect of ionizing radiations by a thorough knowledge of tissue kinetics for an improved therapeutic ratio.     

Comparison of low and high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer. Retrospective analysis of two sequential series

PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis aims to report on the comparative outcome of cervical cancer patients treated with low dose rate (LDR) and high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1989 to 1995, 190 patients were treated with low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy (LDR group) and from 1994 to 2001, 118 patients were treated with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (HDR group). FIGO stage distribution for the LDR group was Stage I: 6.3%; Stage II: 57.4%; and Stage III: 36.3% and for the HDR group Stage I: 9.3%; Stage II: 43.2%; and Stage III: 47.4%. All patients were treated with telecobalt external-beam radiotherapy (EBR). Median doses of LDR brachytherapy at Point A were 40 Gy and 50 Gy for patients treated with 1 and 2 implants, respectively. All patients from the HDR group were treated with 24 Gy in 4 fractions of 6 Gy to Point A. Survival, disease-free survival, local control, and late complications at 5 years, were endpoints compared for both groups. RESULTS: Median follow-up time for LDR and HDR groups was 70 months (range, 8-127 months) and 33 months (range, 4-117 months), respectively. For all stages combined, overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control at 5 years were better in the LDR group (69% vs. 55%, p = 0.007; 73% vs. 56%, p = 0.002; and 74% vs. 65%; p = 0.04, respectively). For clinical Stages I and II, no differences was seen in overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control at 5 years between the two groups. For clinical Stage III, overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years were better in the LDR group than in the HDR group (46% vs. 36%, p = 0.04 and 49% vs. 37%, p = 0.03, respectively), and local control was marginally higher in the LDR group than in the HDR group (58% vs. 50%, p = 0.19). The 5-year probability of rectal complications was higher in the LDR group than in the HDR group (16% vs. 8%, p = 0.03) and 5-year probability of small bowel and urinary complications was not statistically different between the the LDR group and the HDR group (4.6% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.17 and 6% vs. 3%, p = 0.13, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This comparative series suggests similar outcome for Stages I and II patients treated with either HDR or LDR brachytherapy. Lower overall and disease-free survival and marginally lower local control were observed for Stage III patients treated with HDR brachytherapy. Less late rectal complications were observed in the HDR group patients. These findings were probably the result of the relatively low HDR brachytherapy dose delivered at Point A.     

High versus low dose rate intracavitary irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy has been used as a standard modality in the treatment of patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the effects of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy on patients with adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix and to compare them with the effects of LDR brachytherapy. METHODS: From January 1971 to December 1992, 104 patients suffering from adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix were treated with radiation therapy in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University. LDR brachytherapy was carried out on 34 patients and HDR brachytherapy on 70 patients. In the LDR group, eight patients were in stage IB, six in IIA, 12 in IIB, three in IIIA and five in IIIB. External radiation therapy was delivered with 10 MV X-rays, 2 Gy fraction per day, total dose of whole pelvis 36-52 Gy (median 46 Gy). LDR radium intracavitary irradiation was performed with a Henschke applicator, 37-59 Gy targeted at point A (median 43 Gy). In the HDR group, there were 16 patients in stage IB, six in IIA, 32 in IIB and 16 in IIIB. The total whole pelvis dose of external radiation was 40-50 Gy (median 44 Gy), daily 1.8-2.0 Gy. HDR Co-60 intracavitary irradiation was performed with a remotely controlled after-loading system (RALS), 30-48 Gy (median 39 Gy) targeted at point A, three times per week, 3 Gy per fraction. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate in the LDR group was 72.9, 61.9 and 35.7% in stage I, II and III, respectively and the corresponding figures for HDR were 87.1, 58.3 and 43.8% (p > 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the HDR group and the LDR group in terms of the 5-year overall survival rate from adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. There was a late complication rate of 12% in the LDR group and 27% in the HDR group. The incidence of late complications in stages II and III was higher in the HDR group than in the LDR group (31.6 vs 16.7% in stage II, 37.3% vs 12.5% in stage III, p > 0.05). No prognostic factors were evident in the comparison between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in terms of 5-year survival rate in the patients with adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix between those treated with HDR and those treated with LDR brachytherapy. Even though late complication rates were higher in the HDR group, most of them were classified as grade I. This retrospective study suggests that HDR brachytherapy may be able to replace LDR brachytherapy in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.     

Results and complications of high dose rate and low dose rate brachytherapy in carcinoma of the cervix: Cerrahpa?a experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results and complications of treatment with high dose rate (HDR) compared to low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy in cervical carcinoma. METHODS: Three hundred and seventy patients who were treated with external irradiation and intracavitary brachytherapy and followed for more than 2 years between 1978 and 1998 have been recently updated. The low dose rate group consisted of 77 cases treated between 1978 and 1982 and HDR group consisted of 293 cases treated between 1982 and 1998. All patients first received external irradiation with 60Co or 9-18 MV photons and a median dose of 54 Gy was given in 6 weeks. In the LDR group, intracavitary treatment was given with Manchester applicators loaded with radium (30 mg) in an intrauterine tube and 20 mg in vaginal ovoids. The dose delivered to point A was on average 32 Gy in one application. In the HDR group, a total dose of 24 Gy was given to point A in three insertions 1 week apart. The dose rate was 0.62 Gy at point A. RESULTS: The 5-year pelvic control rate was found to be 73% in the HDR group, compared with 86% in the radium group for stage I cases. In stage IIB and IIIB cases, the rates were 68% and 45% for HDR and 65% and 53% for LDR, respectively. In all stages, there was no statistical difference in pelvic control and survival rates between the two groups. Overall incidence of late complications was found as 31.1% and 31.9% in HDR and LDR groups, respectively. The grade 2-4 late complication rate was 14% in the HDR group compared to 19% in the LDR group (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: HDR brachytherapy in the management of the cervix appears to be a safe and efficacious approach. Pelvic control, survival and complications rates are quite similar when compared with LDR.     

Intraluminal brachytherapy for malignant endobronchial tumors: an update on low-dose rate versus high-dose rate radiation therapy

Although the evolution from low-dose rate (LDR) to high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for malignant endobronchial tumors was presumably based on economy, patient convenience, and radiation protection, our experience with both modalities permits assessment of the pros and cons of each technique. In November 1991, our HDR remote afterloading brachytherapy unit became operational. By that time, we had treated 110 patients (group 1) with malignant endobronchial obstruction with LDR brachytherapy. Since then, all patients have been treated with HDR brachytherapy. The outcome of our first 110 patients (group 2) treated with HDR brachytherapy is presented in this communication, using group 1 as the historic control group. In group 1, patients were treated with 1 or 2 sessions of 30-60 Gy, each calculated at a 1-cm radius. In group 2, patients received 3 or 4 weekly treatments of 7 Gy, each calculated at a 1-cm radius. The majority of patients in each group had previously received a full course of external beam irradiation, and a history of laser bronchoscopy was also similar for the 2 groups. Differences in bronchoscopic response rate (82% vs. 96%, respectively) and complications (3.6% vs. 2.7%, respectively) were statistically insignificant between the LDR group and the HDR group. We believe HDR brachytherapy is the state-of-the-art modality in intraluminal therapy for endobronchial malignancies.     

Low-dose-rate brachytherapy is superior to high-dose-rate brachytherapy for bladder cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of a high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy schedule in the treatment of bladder cancer and to investigate the impact of different values of repair half-times and alpha/beta ratios on the design of the HDR schedule. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2000 and 2002, 40 patients with T1G3 and T2 bladder carcinoma were treated with 30 Gy external beam radiotherapy followed by interstitial HDR brachytherapy to a total dose of 32 Gy in 10 sessions of 3.2-Gy fractions in two fractions daily with a 6-h interfraction interval. The local control rate and toxicity were compared with a historical group of 108 patients treated with 30 Gy external beam radiotherapy followed by 40-Gy interstitial low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. The HDR schedule was designed to be biologically equivalent to the previously used LDR schedule with the linear-quadratic model, including incomplete mono-exponential repair. RESULTS: The local control rate at 2 years was 72% for HDR vs. 88% for LDR brachytherapy (p = 0.04). In the HDR group, 5 of 30 evaluable patients encountered serious late toxicity: 4 patients developed a contracted bladder with inadequate capacity (<100 mL), and 1 patient required cystectomy because of a painful ulcer at the implant site. In the LDR group, only 2 of 84 assessable patients developed serious late toxicity. One patient developed a persisting vesicocutaneous fistula and the other a urethral stricture due to fibrosis. The difference in observed late toxicity for HDR vs. LDR was statistically significant (p = 0.005). The increased late toxicity with the HDR schedule compared with the LDR schedule suggests a short repair half-time of 0.5-1 h for late-responding normal bladder tissue. CONCLUSION: Local control of HDR brachytherapy for bladder cancer was disappointing and late toxicity unexpectedly high. The increase in late toxicity suggested a short repair half-time of 0.5-1 h for late-responding normal bladder tissue, which would not support HDR brachytherapy in the treatment of bladder cancer. The analysis demonstrated that the calculation of equivalent HDR schedules on the basis of the LDR schedules used in clinical practice might be hazardous.     

3D conformal HDR brachytherapy and external beam irradiation combined with temporary androgen deprivation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment outcome of 3D conformal high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy and external beam irradiation (EBRT) combined with temporary androgen deprivation for patients with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1997 and September 1999 we treated 102 patients with stage T1-3 N0 M0 prostate cancer. Stage T1-2 was found in 71, T3 in 31 patients. Median pretreatment PSA level was 15.3 ng/ml. After ultrasound-guided transrectal implantation of four afterloading needles, CT based 3D brachytherapy planning was performed. All patients received four HDR implants using a reference dose per implant of 5 or 7Gy. Time between each implant was 14 days. After brachytherapy EBRT followed up to 39.6 or 45.0 Gy. All patients received temporary androgen deprivation, starting 2-19 months before brachytherapy, ending 3 months after EBRT. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 2.6 years (range 2.0-4.1 years). Actuarial biochemical control rate was 87% at 2 years and 82% at 3 years. In 14 patients we noted biochemical failure, in five patients clinical failure. Overall survival was 90%, disease specific survival 98.0% at 3 years. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 4%, late grade 3 toxicity in 5%. One patient developed a prostatourethral-rectal fistula as late grade 4 toxicity. The conformal quality of 300 HDR implants was analyzed using dose volume histograms. CONCLUSIONS: 3D conformal HDR brachytherapy and EBRT combined with temporary androgen deprivation is an effective treatment modality for prostate cancer with minimal associated toxicity and encouraging biochemical control rates after a median follow-up of 2.6 years.     

宫颈癌低剂量率后装腔内放射治疗的远期疗效

目的 评价Gynatron低剂量率后装腔内治疗机的疗效。方法 总结1980年4月－1986年6月间,应用Gynatron后装机配合^60Co治疗机进行根治性放疗的136例宫颈癌,并与镭疗及高剂量率腔内后装治疗进行比较分析。结果 除5例失访外,全部患者随访超过15年,随访率96.3%（131／136）。Ⅱ、Ⅲ期的10年生存率分别为83.9%和43.2%。总10年生存率为63.5%。放射性直肠炎发生率为12.5%（17／136）,放射性膀胱炎发生率9.6%（13／136）。结论 Gynatron低剂量率后装腔内治疗系统虽然有一定局限性,但仍可获得较满意的疗效;其治疗并发症患者可以接受,放射性直肠炎、放射性膀胱炎发生率高于镭疗,低于高剂量率腔内后装放疗。     

Geometric stability of intracavitary pulsed dose rate brachytherapy monitored by in vivo rectal dosimetry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate geometric stability of applicator and rectum during pulsed dose rate (PDR) intracavitary brachytherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 14 patients with cervical cancer (stages IIB-IVA) were analysed retrospectively. A dose of 10 Gy to point A was prescribed per brachytherapy session, and PDR was given with 1 Gy/pulse, 1 pulse/h, using a ring applicator (Varian). A rectal dosimeter consisting of five diodes spaced by 1.5 cm was routinely placed in the rectum. The diodes detected the progression of each pulse of radiation, as the stepping source was advanced through the applicator. A mathematical model has been developed for spatial analysis of the pattern of the dose readings. The model transforms dose measurement into a quantification of the geometric relationship between rectum diodes and applicator. RESULTS: The model could be used for all treatment sessions, and the relative positions of diodes and applicator were calculated for each pulse of radiation. The SD of displacements during the treatment was below 2.8mm in all directions for all patients. The mean SD in lateral, longitudinal and anterior-posterior directions were 1.2 +/- 0.7, 1.2 +/- 0.7 and 0.9 +/- 0.6 mm, respectively. The mean measurement uncertainty was below 0.8 +/- 0.5 mm in all directions. CONCLUSIONS: A new mathematical method has been developed, enabling us to quantitate and monitor relative positions of applicator and rectal diodes during a PDR treatment. The spatial relation between rectal dosimeter and applicator was very stable during extended PDR treatments suggesting that the geometric stability of PDR treatment is at the same level as the stability reported for HDR brachytherapy.     

High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix

High-dose-rate (HDR) remote afterloading intracavitary brachytherapy has been widely used in the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix in Europe and Asia since the 1960's. Recently, there has been an increase of interest in the use of this technique in North America. Most of the non-randomized studies suggest similar survival, local control, and complication rates using fractionated high-dose-rate remote afterloading intracavitary brachytherapy combined with external beam irradiation compared to historical or concurrent low-dose-rate (LDR) controls. However, the techniques as well as the dose fractionation schedules used in different institutions are variable. The optimal technique and dose fractionation scheme has yet to be established through systematic clinical trials.     

Head and neck brachytherapy

Experience accumulated over several decades in the treatment of head and neck tumors by irradiation has demonstrated the need for a high tumor dose to achieve local control. With external beam irradiation alone, it is difficult to spare adjacent normal tissues, resulting in undesirable late effects on the salivary glands, mandible, and muscles of mastication. Interstitial implantation is ideally suited to deliver a high dose limited to the volume of the primary tumor, thus maximizing tumor control while minimizing complications. A large experience has been accumulated with low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy in treatment of carcinoma of oral cavity, oropharynx, and nasopharynx. Recent analysis of large clinical series provided data indicating that modalities of LDR brachytherapy should be optimized in treating these tumors for increasing therapeutic ratio. LDR brachytherapy is now challenged by high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy and pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy. Preliminary results obtained with these 2 last modalities will be discussed.     

In-vivo Comparison of Planned and Measured Rectal Doses during Cobalt-60 HDR CT-based Intracavitary Brachytherapy Applications of Cervical Cancer Using the PTW 9112 Semiconductor Probe

Background: A semiconductor rectal probe was used to compare planned and measured rectal doses during Co-60 high dose rate (HDR) CT-based intracavitary brachytherapy applications (ICBT) of cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 22 HDR brachytherapy applications were included from 11 patients who were first treated with EBRT to the whole pelvis with a total prescribed dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. During each application, a PTW 9112 probe rectal probe having a series of five semiconductor diodes (R1 to R5) was inserted into the patient’s rectum and a CT-based HDR ICBT application with a prescribed dose per fraction of 7 or 7.5 Gy to HRCTV was performed. Measurements were carried in water phantom using PTW rectal and universal adaptor plugs. Doses measured in phantom and with patients were compared to those calculated by the treatment planning system. Results: The mean percentage dose difference ΔD (%) between calculated and measured values from phantom study were -5.29%, 1.89%, -2.72%, -4.76, and 0.72% for R1, R2, R3, R4, and R3 diodes, respectively and the overall mean ΔD (%) value with standard deviation (SD) was -2.03%±9.6%. From the patient study, a ΔD (%) that ranged from -19.5% to 24.0%, which corresponded to dose disparities between -0.77 Gy and 0.66 Gy. The median ΔD (%) ranged from 0.4% to 1.3%, or -0.03 to 0.05 Gy, respectively. ΔD (%) values exceeded 10% in approximately 26.4% of measurements (29 out of 110 in 22 applications). The location of Rmax in computed and measured values differs in 5 of 22 applications might be due to possible displacement of rectal probe between simulation and treatment. Conclusion: Despite the likely geometrical shift of measuring detectors between insertion and treatment, in-vivo dosimetry is feasible and can be used to estimate the dose to the rectum during HDR ICBT.