Simultaneous Versus Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

An important source of debate in many orthopaedic practices is the choice of performing simultaneous or staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Questions/Purpose

The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare simultaneous bilateral with staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty for peri-operative complication rates, infection rates and mortality outcomes.

Methods

All relevant citations were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE databases and the unpublished literature. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality and abstracted data was conducted independently by two reviewers. Data was categorized into subgroups and pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird’s random effects model.

Results

A total of 18 articles were identified from 873 potentially relevant titles and selected for inclusion in the primary meta-analyses. The incidence of mortality was significantly higher in the simultaneous group at 30 days (RR [relative risk] 3.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68–8.02, p?=?0.001, I ²?=?59%, n?=?67,691 patients), 3 months (RR 2.45, 95% CI 2.15–2.79, p?<?0.00001, I ²?=?0%, n?=?66,142 patients) and 1 year (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.66–2.06, p?<?0.001, I ²?=?0%, n?=?65,322 patients) after surgery. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in regards to in-hospital mortality rates (R 1.18, 95% CI 0.74–1.88, p?=?0.48, I ²?=?0%, n?=?33,814 patients). In addition, there was no increased risk of deep vein thrombosis, cardiac complication, and pulmonary embolism or infection rates in either comparison group.

Conclusions

The results of the analysis suggest that simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty has a significantly higher rate of mortality at 30 days, 3 months and 1 year after surgery, but similar infection and complication rates in comparison to staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty.     

Short Interval Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Safety Compared to Simultaneous and Later Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundSimultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (sim-BTKA) is reported to be safe in a select group of patients. Patients with symptomatic bilateral knee arthritis who are not candidates for sim-BTKA require staged surgery (stag-BTKA). This study aimed to compare the safety and complications associated with sim-BTKA with stag-BTKA performed at 2 time intervals.MethodsThis retrospective study of prospectively collected data includes bilateral TKA cases performed between 2001 and 2019. A cohort of sim-BTKA (n = 2728) was compared to a cohort of stag-BTKA (n = 1658). The staged group was subdivided according to the interval between surgeries: ≤90 days (early) and ≥91 days (later). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for confounding variables.ResultsIn-hospital complication rates were lower in both arms of the stag-BTKA groups vs the sim-BTKA. The sim-BTKA group had higher odds ratio of anemia, electrolyte disturbances, pulmonary embolism, and respiratory, urinary, gastrointestinal, and neurological complications. Lower rates of all-cause revision were found in stag-BTKA vs sim-BTKA groups. There was a trend toward revision due to deep infection when increasing the interim before the second stag-BTKA procedure. No differences in complication rates after the second surgery were detected between the early and later stag-BTKA.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that sim-BTKA is associated with more complications and revisions when compared to stag-BTKA. Performing the second-stage TKA at 90 days or less after the first TKA is not associated with increased risk of complications. Performing sim-BTKA, simply for convenience, is not warranted and should be reserved for a select group of patient matching specific criteria.     

Bilateral Simultaneous vs Staged Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Difference in Perioperative Risks

BackgroundWith the rising utilization of total joint arthroplasty, the role of simultaneous-bilateral surgery will have an expanding impact. The purpose of this study is to examine the risks of perioperative complications with this approach in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), to inform shared decision-making.MethodsWe reviewed national hospital discharge data from 2005 to 2014 to compare outcomes between simultaneous-bilateral TKAs (sim-BTKAs) and staged-bilateral TKAs (staged-BTKAs). Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for confounders. Outcomes analyzed included mortality, various medical complications, knee infection, and mechanical complications.ResultsThis study analyzed 27,301 sim-BTKAs and 45,419 staged-BTKAs. Patients who underwent simultaneous surgery had a statistically significant higher adjusted odds of mortality, cardiac events, thromboembolic events, and complications involving the urinary and digestive systems, and a lower adjusted odds of deep knee infection and hematoma. Thirteen of the 14 complications had overall incidences less than 2% and 1 outcome had an incidence of 3%. The absolute between-group risk difference for any complication was 1% or less.ConclusionSim-BTKAs have a statistically significant increased odds of multiple complications compared to staged-BTKAs. However, the absolute risk differences between these options are minimal and the occurrence of any complication is low.Level of EvidenceTherapeutic Level III.     

Mortality and Implant Survival With Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Experience From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure for relieving pain and restoring function in osteoarthritis, with a significant proportion of patients having severe disease bilaterally. However, although there are differences in patient selection criteria for bilateral procedures, there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing for bilateral TKA. The aim of this study was to compare rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality between simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Shorter Length of Stay but Increased Mortality Compared With Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundPrimary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with high patient satisfaction. However, controversy remains regarding the safety and efficacy of conducting simultaneous bilateral (simBTKA) versus staged bilateral TKA (staBTKA). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence for simBTKA versus staBTKA and compare clinical outcomes including mortality, complications and length of stay (LOS).MethodsA search was performed of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane central databases between January 2000 and March 2020. Search terms included “simultaneous,” “staged,” and “bilateral TKA.” Inclusion criteria comprised studies comparing outcomes of simBTKA versus staBTKA. Quality of included studies was assessed and meta-analyses of pooled data was conducted.Results29 articles published between 2001 and 2020 were included in qualitative synthesis from 927 potentially relevant titles, comprising 257,284 patients. 104,207 patients underwent simBTKA and 153,632 patients underwent staBTKA. simBTKA was associated with significantly increased 90-day mortality rate (P < .00001, OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.79-2.81), increased incidence of pulmonary embolism (P < .00001, OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.51-1.89), venous thrombosis (P < .00001, OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.23-1.43), and neurological complications (P = .002, OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13-1.77). Incidence of superficial and deep infection was significantly increased with staBTKA (P = .02, P < .00001 respectively). Revision rate within one year was equivocal. Mean LOS was 2.1 days shorter for simBTKA.ConclusionSimBTKA was associated with decreased incidence of infection and LOS but increased incidence of 90-day mortality, venous thromboembolism and neurological complications. Revision rates were equivocal. Patients should be selected and counseled based on the risks respective to each strategy.     

Comparison of Simultaneous Bilateral and Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty in Terms of Perioperative Complications

We compared bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed at a single session vs those performed at 2 separate sessions with respect to complications, amount of blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Study participants included 119 consecutive patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA and an additional 119 patients undergoing staged bilateral TKA. Systemic complication in the simultaneous bilateral TKA was significantly higher statistically than that in the staged bilateral TKA. Therefore, performing simultaneous bilateral TKA in elderly or high-risk patients results in a significantly higher rate of systemic complications. Simultaneous bilateral TKA is a relatively safe and beneficial procedure with a minimal increase in the risk of systemic complications. However, this procedure should be conducted carefully, particularly in elderly and high-risk patients.     

The Swedish Elbow Arthroplasty Register and the Swedish Shoulder Arthroplasty Register: two new Swedish arthroplasty registers

Two new national orthopedic quality registers were started in Sweden in 1999, the Swedish Shoulder Arthroplasty Register and the Swedish Elbow Arthroplasty Register. Both are owned by the Swedish Shoulder and Elbow Section of the Swedish Orthopedic Association. The purpose of the registers is to improve surgical techniques and selection of implants and identify individual risk factors. Two of the main problems in starting a new national quality register involve inducing all centers in the country to participate and deciding on the data to register.     

Mortality and Implant Survival With Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: Experience From the Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective procedure for relieving pain and restoring function in osteoarthritis. A significant proportion of patients have severe disease bilaterally. Consensus regarding safety and selection of patients for simultaneous bilateral THA or the optimal timing for staged THA has not been reached. The aim of this study is to compare rates, causes of revision, and 30-day mortality between simultaneous and staged bilateral THA using data from the Australian Orthopedic National Joint Replacement Registry.MethodsData for 12,359 bilateral THA procedures were collected from September, 1999 to December, 2017. Rates and causes of revision and 30-day mortality were obtained for simultaneous bilateral and staged procedures with intervals of 1 day-6 weeks, 6 weeks-3 months, and 3 months-6 months. Yearly cumulative percent revision or cumulative percent survival with 95% confidence intervals calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and adjusted hazard ratios were used for comparisons.ResultsThirty-day mortality is lower in patients who have bilateral procedures within 6 months, regardless of timing, than those who have unilateral procedures (0.06% vs 0.18%). Staged bilateral THA had a significantly lower mortality than simultaneous bilateral THA (odds ratio 0.175, 95% confidence interval = 0.04-0.78, P = .022). When separate time intervals were compared, no significant differences were seen. Bilateral 6 week-3 months has a higher rate of revision from 1.5 years-2years compared with same day bilaterals (hazard ratio = 2.39, 95% confidence interval = 1.12, 5.09, P = .024). There were no other significant differences in the rate of revision between groups.The most common reasons for revision were fracture, loosening, and infection. Simultaneous bilateral procedures have a significantly higher rate of revision for fracture compared with staging 3-6 months (hazard ratio = 1.96 [1.27, 3.03], P = .002).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that bilateral THA has a low mortality rate regardless of time interval between procedures. Simultaneous and staged bilateral THA have similar rates of revision.     

Disparate Postoperative Results in the First and Second Knees on Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

We hypothesized that the circumstances of the two consecutive operations of a simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are different, and could lead to different outcomes of overlapping bilateral TKAs. Both knees of 420 subjects were evaluated in the current study. In the second TKA, there were more incidence rates of outlier in mechanical femoro-tibial angle (16.2% vs. 9.0%), more blood loss (735 vs. 656 mL), and longer operation time (61, 58 minutes respectively), as compared to the first TKA, while no significant differences in clinical outcomes. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes even though few distinct outcomes due to different circumstances of the surgery. Awareness of these findings can help the continued success of bilateral TKA in an increasing patient population.     

Cost Analysis,Complications, and Discharge Disposition Associated With Simultaneous vs Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Simultaneous vs staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) has long been debated. The primary objective of this study was to compare actual hospital costs and complication rates in patients undergoing simultaneous BTKA (simBTKA) and staged BTKA (staBTKA) at a single institution.

Comparing the Safety and Outcome of Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty in Contemporary Practice: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BackgroundAlthough a variety of studies have assessed the outcomes of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) and staged BTKA, there remains no definitive conclusion regarding the superiority of one technique in terms of safety.MethodsThe US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried utilizing keywords pertinent to BTKA, simultaneous and staged, and clinical or functional outcomes. In order to examine the contemporary relevant literature, studies published prior to 2009 were excluded from our search.ResultsIn total, 19 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. The overall quality of the studies included in this review was rated as moderate. Seven of the 19 studies reported no significant differences between the 2 groups in regards to baseline clinical and demographic characteristics (comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, preoperative clinical subjective scores). Nearly all from these 7 studies with comparable initial characteristics documented no significant differences in the overall complication rates between the 2 groups in addition to no difference in mortality rate, cardiac complications, revision rate, thromboembolic events, and functional outcomes.ConclusionIn contemporary studies involving comparable baseline demographics (including comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade), there was moderate evidence to show that simultaneous BTKA is as safe as the staged BTKA.     

One-Week Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Protocol: A Safety Comparison of Intended and Completed Surgeries

The number of patients requiring bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is expected to grow rapidly. While some trials have compared staged with simultaneous TKA, no literature characterizes the subset of staged TKA patients who cancel their second surgery. In this study, we report on the safety and utility of a one-week staged TKA protocol in a series of 145 patients who registered to undergo staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty one week apart. Among these patients, we identify a significantly higher complication rate and comorbidity status among patients who do not proceed to a second TKA. This finding identifies a potential advantage of a staged protocol over simultaneous bilateral TKA in not subjecting higher-risk patients to a second physiologic insult of a contralateral TKA.     

The Optimal Period of Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Procedures under Enhanced Recovery: A Retrospective Study

Objective

The implications of the interval of staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures for postoperative complications and costs are not clear. We aimed to determine the optimal time interval between the two stages of bilateral TKA procedures under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol.

Methods

This retrospective study of collected data included bilateral TKA cases under the ERAS protocol performed between 2018 and 2021 at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The staged time was subdivided into three groups according to the interval between the first TKA and second contralateral TKA: group 1: 2- to 6-month, group 2: 6- to 12-month, and group 3: >12 months. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay (LOS), hemoglobin (Hb) decrease, hematocrit (Hct) decrease, and albumin (Alb) decrease.

Results

We analyzed 281 patients who underwent staged bilateral TKAs between 2018 and 2021 at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Regarding postoperative complications, there were no statistically significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.21). For the mean LOS, the 6- to 12-month group had a significantly shorter LOS compared with the 2- to 6-month group (P < 0.01). There was also a significant decrease in Hct of the 2- to 6-month group compared with the 6- to 12-month group and the >12 months group (P = 0.02; P < 0.05, respectively).

Conclusion

Staging the second arthroplasty for more than a half year seems to offer a reduction in the rate of postoperative complications and LOS under ERAS protocol. ERAS shortens the interval of staged bilateral TKA by at least 6 months for patients who might receive their second surgery without the need to wait for an extended period.     

Increased long-term mortality in patients less than 55 years old who have undergone knee replacement for osteoarthritis: results from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register

Patients with osteoarthritis undergoing knee replacement have been reported to have an overall reduced mortality compared with that of the general population. This has been attributed to the selection of healthier patients for surgery. However, previous studies have had a maximum follow-up time of ten years. We have used information from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register to study the mortality of a large national series of patients with total knee replacement for up to 28 years after surgery and compared their mortality with that of the normal population. In addition, for a subgroup of patients operated on between 1980 and 2002 we analysed their registered causes of death to determine if they differed from those expected. We found a reduced overall mortality during the first 12 post-operative years after which it increased and became significantly higher than that of the general population. Age-specific analysis indicated an inverse correlation between age and mortality, where the younger the patients were, the higher their mortality. The shift at 12 years was caused by a relative over-representation of younger patients with a longer follow-up. Analysis of specific causes of death showed a higher mortality for cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and urogenital diseases. The observation that early onset of osteoarthritis of the knee which has been treated by total knee replacement is linked to an increased mortality should be a reason for increased general awareness of health problems in these patients.