Addressing physician shortages in New Mexico through a combined BA/MD program.

The University of New Mexico School of Medicine and College of Arts and Sciences developed its combined BA/MD degree program, which will increase the medical school class from 75 students to 100 in the fall of 2010, to address the critical issue of physician shortages in underserved New Mexico. The program, which began operation at the undergraduate (i.e., college) level in 2006, expands opportunities in medical education for New Mexico students, especially those from rural and underserved minority communities, and prepares them to practice in underserved areas of New Mexico. In the BA/MD program, students will earn a bachelor of arts, a medical degree, and a proposed certificate in public health. A challenging liberal arts curriculum introduces the principles of public health. Students have unique rural medicine and public health preceptorship opportunities that begin in the undergraduate years and continue throughout medical school. Students work with a community physician mentor in summer service-learning projects during the undergraduate years, then they return for required rural medicine rotations in the first, third, and fourth years of medical school. Simultaneously, the classroom curriculum for these rural medicine experiences emphasizes the public health perspective. High priority has been placed on supporting students with academic advising and counseling, tutoring, supplemental instruction, on-campus housing, and scholarships. The program has received strong support from communities, the New Mexico state legislature, the New Mexico Medical Society, and the faculties of arts and sciences and the school of medicine. Early results on the undergraduate level demonstrate strong interest from applicants, retention of participants, and enthusiasm of students and faculty alike.     

The contribution of Memorial University's medical school to rural physician supply

INTRODUCTION: This study identifies the characteristics and predictors of Memorial University of Newfoundland (MUN) medical graduates working in rural Canada and rural Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). METHODS: We linked data from class lists, the alumni and postgraduate databases with the Southam Medical database to determine 2004 practice locations for MUN graduates from 1973 to 1998 (26 yr, inclusive). Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors for each outcome. RESULTS: In 2004, 167 (12.6%) MUN graduates worked in rural Canada and 81 (6.1%) MUN graduates worked in rural NL. Those who were more likely to practise in rural Canada (when compared with graduates from urban backgrounds, those who had not done any residency training at MUN or specialists, respectively) were graduates from a rural background (odds ratio [OR] 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-2.76), those who had done residency training at MUN (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.29) and family physicians (FPs)-general practitioners (GPs) (OR 6.64, 95% CI 4.31-10.23). Those who were more likely to practise in rural NL (when compared with graduates from urban backgrounds, those who had not done any residency training at MUN, specialists or non-Newfoundlanders, respectively) were graduates from a rural background (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.57-4.11), those who had done residency training at MUN (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.94-8.76), FP-GPs (OR 6.39, 95% CI 3.39-12.05) and Newfoundlanders (OR 7.01, 95% CI 2.16-22.71). CONCLUSION: The MUN medical school has made a substantial contribution to rural physician supply in both NL and Canada. Increasing the number of local rural students as well as providing incentives to graduates to complete postgraduate training in family medicine in the province may increase the number of locally trained rural physicians.     

Characteristics of medical schools related to the choice of family medicine as a specialty

Previous research has identified five characteristics of medical schools that are related to the choice of family medicine as a specialty: (1) the amount of time devoted to required training in family medicine, (2) the timing of the required family medicine training, (3) the type of ownership of the school (public or private), (4) the geographic location of the school, and (5) the administrative structure of family medicine within the school. These five characteristics of U.S. medical schools during the mid-1980s, together with the school tuition levels, were examined with both univariate and multivariate analysis to observe their relationships to the percentage of U.S. medical graduates entering family medicine between July 1986 and December 1987. With univariate analysis, each characteristic was significantly related to the percentage of graduates entering family medicine. Using multivariate analysis, only the number of weeks required and the type of ownership of the school were significantly related to the percentage of graduates entering family medicine, with the higher percentages related to greater numbers of required weeks of family medicine training and to public ownership of the school.     

Family practice training over the first 26 years: a cross-sectional survey of graduates of the University of Washington Family Practice Residency Network.

PURPOSE: To describe the current practice setting, scope of practice, and adequacy of residency training of a large cohort of family practice (FP) residency graduates. METHOD: In February 2000, questionnaires containing 120 demographic, practice, and training items were mailed to 1,498 graduates (1973-1999) of the University of Washington Family Practice Residency Network. RESULTS: A total of 983 (71%) graduates completed the survey. Of the 870 who were currently practicing family physicians, 38% were women, 73% worked full-time, 45% practiced in FP groups, and 97% were board certified in FP. A total of 37% practiced in communities of fewer than 25,000 residents, and 29% practiced in federally designated health provider shortage sites. Most cared for their patients in the hospital: 79% for adult medical patients, 54% for adult ICU/CCU patients, and 71% for children. Most provided maternity care: 63% delivered babies and 58% assisted at cesarean sections (12% as primary surgeon). Even in cities of over 100,000, 58% delivered babies. Large numbers of responders performed colposcopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, vasectomy, and minor surgery. A higher proportion of the most recent graduates provided maternity care and performed colposcopy. Most graduates reported that residency training prepared them well. CONCLUSIONS: FP residency training is modeled to prepare primary care physicians to meet the needs of all patients in all communities. These data document the success of this model in producing and sustaining family physicians to fulfill these roles in practice.     

Rural training tracks in four family practice residencies.

The use of rural training tracks (RTTs) in family practice residencies is a new strategy (beginning in the late 1980s) to increase the number of residents selecting rural careers. The authors describe the four residencies (in Washington, Nebraska, New York, and Kentucky) that have established RTTs. The first residency year is completed in an urban tertiary care center, and the second and third years are completed in a distant rural community wherein the primary faculty are the members of a rural family practice group. Inpatient experience for the residents is provided by community hospitals that offer obstetrics, emergency room care, and first-line critical care. The residents' training is supplemented by specialty faculty practicing in the rural communities. The curricula are highly structured and are evaluated to ensure training experiences of high quality. The RTTs' financial support comes from state initiatives, hospital reimbursement, recruitment budgets, and outpatient care revenues. The authors conclude that the RTT concept has the potential to lessen the shortage of rural physicians.     

Preparing graduates for the first year of residency: are medical schools meeting the need?

PURPOSE: Changes in graduate medical education associated with full implementation of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 have required medical schools to review and revise their curricula. As limited funding increases pressures to streamline training, residencies will potentially expect an entry level of skill and competence that is greater than that which schools are currently providing. To determine whether medical school curricular requirements correlate with residency needs, this multidisciplinary pilot study investigated expectations and prerequisites for postgraduate specialty training. METHOD: A questionnaire about 100 skills and competencies expected of new first-year residents was sent to 50 U.S. residency directors from surgery, internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics-gynecology programs. Each director was asked to state expectations of a first-year resident's competence in each skill at entry to residency and after three months of training. Skills deemed most appropriately acquired in residency were also identified. Competencies included diagnosis, management, triage, interpretation of data, informatics and technology, record keeping, interpersonal communications, and manual skills. RESULTS: A total of 39 residency directors responded, including seven surgery, nine medicine, seven family medicine, eight pediatrics, and eight obstetrics-gynecology. In addition to physical examination skills, 13 competencies achieved more than 70% agreement as being entry-level skills. There was wide variability as to the relative importance of the remaining skills, with residency directors expecting to devote significant resources and time in early training to ensure competence. CONCLUSIONS: Medical schools should consider the expectations of their students' future residency directors when developing new curricula. Assuring students' competencies through focused curricular change should save both time and resources during residency.     

The effects of certain student and institutional characteristics on minority medical student specialty choice.

This article investigates the possible effects of minority status, presence of a Minority Affairs Office or Student National Medical Association (SNMA) Chapter, level of indebtedness, and number of years (4 to 5) to complete medical school on specialty choice of minority medical students. The 5-year experiences of 20 medical schools in the southern region (including three in Puerto Rico) were examined via a questionnaire. Information was sought for African Americans, Afro-Caribbean, Mexican American, other minority, and nonminority students. Minority graduates entered the specialities of internal medicine, pediatrics, and family medicine in far greater numbers than any other speciality. Also, the percentage of minorities who entered these fields was greater than the percentage of non-minorities. Conversely, minorities were significantly underrepresented in the surgical subspecialties and radiology. Additional study is needed to further examine the medical school experience for indications of why the clustering in primary care specialities occurs. Moreover, while most schools had some kind of minority affairs organization, few were active in the writing of the Dean''s letter. Other suggestions to assure adequate minority representation across specialties include early exposure to the different specialties and subspecialties for minority students, a mentorship program with practicing physicians, and stronger recruitment of minorities into underrepresented specialties.     

Effects of an expanded medical curriculum on the number of graduates practicing in a rural state

In 1973 the University of North Dakota School of Medicine (UNDSM), following the national trend toward four-year medical programs, expanded its previous two-year medical school curriculum to include all four years of medical education. It was hoped that this change, along with a renewed emphasis on primary care-oriented residency training within the state, would encourage medical students to establish practices within the state. In 1985 the UNDSM's Center for Rural Health mailed questionnaires to the 2,230 living graduates of the UNDSM to document a variety of their personal and practice characteristics. Based on the responses to the 924 completed questionnaires, the authors found that (1) the students from rural North Dakota were more likely than were urban students to practice in rural areas of the state, as were the students with primary care specialty training; and (2) the alumni completing residencies in North Dakota following the curriculum expansion (1976-1985) were more than twice as likely to establish practices in North Dakota. It was concluded that recruiting medical students (preferably in-state "natives") from rural areas, training them in primary care specialty areas, and enabling them to remain in North Dakota for the duration of their medical training (including residency training) combined to exert a considerable "retaining" effect on the UNDSM alumni.     

Effect of a year-long primary care clerkship on graduates' selection of family practice residencies

This report compares the selection of family practice residencies from 1981 through 1989 by graduates trained at two campuses of the State University of New York (SUNY)-Health Science Center at Syracuse College of Medicine, at other New York State campuses, and at all U.S. medical schools. One of the SUNY-Syracuse cohorts comprised the students who had completed all their work at the Syracuse campus, while the other comprised those who had spent their third year at the campus in Binghamton, which has a year-long, half-day-a-week primary care clerkship that is not available at the Syracuse campus, which has no primary care clerkship. Comparison of the proportions of the graduates in the two SUNY-Syracuse cohorts who chose family practice residencies, and comparisons of the proportions of graduates from other New York state schools and from all U.S. schools who selected family practice residencies during the same nine-year period, indicate that the proportion of students trained during their third year at the Binghamton campus who selected family practice residencies was significantly greater (21%; p less than .001). Additional investigation is required to determine whether the year-long nature of the required clerkship affects graduates' choices more than does the primary care content of the clerkship.     

Internal medicine-pediatrics residency training: current program trends and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Combined internal medicine-pediatrics (med-peds) residency programs have existed since 1967. Due to the rapid growth in the number and size of programs during the 1990s, most current med-peds physicians completed their residency in the last ten years, making older studies of med-peds programs obsolete. The authors sought to determine completion rates of med-peds residency programs and describe the initial career plans for five cohorts of graduating residents from combined med-peds training programs. METHOD: Program directors of all U.S. med-peds residency programs were asked to complete a Web-based survey and base their responses on the records of cohorts of residents completing their programs from 1998 through 2002. To allow sufficient time to complete both the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) and American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) certification examinations, certification status was requested only for the cohort completing training in 1998. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 92% (83/90) of the programs, reflecting 1,595 residents entering med-peds programs. Of these residents, 91% graduated from a med-peds program. Among the graduates, 82% were seeing both adults and children, 22% went on to subspecialty residencies, 21% began practice in rural or underserved areas, and 25% entered an academic position. ABIM and ABP pass rates for the 1998 cohort were 97% and 96%, respectively. Overall, 79% of the 1998 graduates are board certified in both specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous studies, a greater proportion of residents who recently entered med-peds programs completed their dual training, and a larger percentage of graduates are seeing both adults and children. The proportion of residents entering subspecialty residencies has increased significantly, but the proportion of graduates in academic careers has remained stable.     

The integrative family medicine program: an innovation in residency education.

The Integrative Family Medicine (IFM) Program is a four-year combined family medicine residency program and integrative medicine fellowship. It was created in 2003 to address the needs of four constituencies: patients who desire care from well trained integrative physicians, physicians who seek such training, the health care system which lacks a conventional integrative medicine training route, and educational leaders in family medicine who are seeking new strategies to reverse the declining interest in family medicine amongst U.S. graduates. The program was designed jointly by the University of Arizona Program in Integrative Medicine (PIM) and family medicine residency programs at Beth Israel/Albert Einstein College of Medicine (AECOM), Maine Medical Center, Middlesex Hospital, Oregon Health & Science University, and the Universities of Arizona and Wisconsin. One or two residents from each of these institutions may apply, and when selected, commit to extending their training by a fourth year. They complete their family medicine residencies at their home sites, enroll in the distributed learning associate fellowship at PIM, and are mentored by local faculty members who have training in integrative medicine. To date three classes totaling twenty residents have entered the program. Evaluation is performed jointly: PIM evaluates the residents during residential weeks and through online modules and residency faculty members perform direct observation of care and review treatment plans. Preliminary data suggest that the program enhances interest amongst graduating medical students in family medicine training. The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education Family Medicine residency review committee has awarded the pilot experimental status.     

An evaluation of the Rural Medical Education Program of the State University Of New York Upstate Medical University, 1990-2003.

PURPOSE: The Rural Medical Education Program (RMED) of the State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University is a 36-week clinical experience in rural communities for medical students that began in 1989. The authors sought to assess RMED's success in providing a valuable educational experience for students that assists rural communities recruit physicians. METHOD: In 2004, the authors used the Physician Masterfiles of the American Medical Association to compare practice locations of SUNY Upstate graduates who completed RMED with those who did not; surveyed former RMED students to assess their satisfaction with their practice location and the importance of RMED in helping them choose a location; interviewed hospital administrators in communities that have hosted RMED students to understand the impact of RMED on host communities; and compared United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 scores of RMED students with those of non-RMED students to evaluate educational attainment. RESULTS: A greater percentage of former RMED students practiced in rural locations [22/86 (26%)] than did non-RMED students [95/1,307 (7%)]. Ninety-one percent (69/76) of former RMED students were satisfied with their location, and 84% (64/76) believed that RMED was important in helping them choose a location. Hospital administrators viewed the program highly because it helped them recruit physicians and benefitted their medical staff. RMED students had higher adjusted mean Step 2 scores than did non-RMED students (212.3 versus 199.1). CONCLUSION: The RMED program has successfully met its goals of providing a valuable educational experience for medical students and assisting rural communities recruit physicians.     

Performances of U.S. osteopathic and Canadian medical school graduates on the American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Examinations, 1984-1988

The performances of Canadian medical school graduates and U.S. osteopathic medical school graduates who first took the American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Examination between 1984 and 1988 were compared with the performances, during the same period, of U.S. and foreign medical school graduates. Approximately 100 Canadian graduates took the examination each year; by 1988 the number of osteopathic graduates taking it was 102, double the number participating in 1984. Nearly all the Canadian graduates attended university or university-affiliated residencies, whereas half of the osteopathic graduates attended non-university-affiliated programs. For their overall clinical competence and for the eight components of clinical competence, the Canadian graduates were rated highest, followed by the U.S., osteopathic, and foreign graduates. The Canadians' average examination scores were also highest. The authors discuss the relatively low level of performance of the osteopathic graduates, but conclude that these graduates appear to be an untapped source of talented physicians for internal medicine residencies. The limitations of studying self-selected groups of candidates are also discussed.     

Gender bias of Ohio physicians in the evaluation of the personal statements of residency applicants

Sexism has been documented at every level of medical training as well as in the community of practicing physicians. Although there is speculation in the literature about sexist attitudes and perceived sexual discrimination influencing a medical student's choice of specialty, there are few data on gender bias in the evaluation of residency candidates applying in different specialties. In 1989, the authors created six personal statements of interest in a residency, each from a different type of fictitious residency candidate (three men, three women, at three levels of medical school achievement) and mailed one or another of the statements, chosen at random, to the 2,478 board-certified Ohio physicians practicing in six specialties in which U.S. women in residencies were underrepresented (less than 12%) compared with the percentage of women in medical schools, and to the 3,586 board-certified Ohio physicians in another six specialties in which women in residencies were overrepresented (more than 38%). The physicians consistently rated the women candidates more favorably than they did the men candidates.     

Surveying graduates of combined internal medicine-pediatrics residency programs

Graduates of all U.S. combined internal medicine-pediatrics residency programs were surveyed in 1987 regarding a variety of demographic information about their residencies and current practices, the residency curricula they had followed for both specialties, and recommendations for modifications in training. The 71 responding graduates (from a total of 112) reported patient care as their major involvement (mean of 42.9 hours per week), with a majority (83%) seeing patients in both pediatric and adult age groups. Most were involved in primary care only (64%). The graduates reported that during both pediatrics and internal medicine training, they had had too many inpatient and intensive care rotations and too few elective and ambulatory rotations. The most important subspecialty rotations in internal medicine were considered to be cardiology, dermatology, and pulmonary medicine; and in pediatrics, infectious disease, cardiology, and adolescent medicine. The graduates recommended more outpatient subspecialty rotations, ambulatory rotations in medicine and pediatrics, and a combined medicine-pediatrics continuity clinic.     

Surveying graduates of one school to determine regional workforce demand.

PURPOSE: To study the demand for physician graduates from one school in one region of the country. The use of demand as a measure of potential regional variation should be of interest to medical educators and policymakers. METHOD: All residency graduates of the University of Washington School of Medicine between 1975 and 1995 (n = 3,824) were surveyed about their ability to gain employment in a timely manner and whether they were recruiting physicians for their practices. RESULTS: The response rate was 50.29%. A non-responder survey was done using a subsample (n = 200), with a 28% return. Over 95% of the graduates had found employment in their desired specialties and locations within two years of finishing their residencies. This was the same for graduates over all years. Approximately 30% of all practices of respondents within the Northwest region were recruiting for new physicians (26% of specialty practices and 34% of generalist practices were recruiting). There was no difference between recruitment in the urban and rural practices or between respondents to the initial survey and those responding to the follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant oversupply of specialist physicians and at least a sufficient supply of generalist physicians nationally, there appears to be a strong demand for both specialists and generalists in the Northwest region of the country. This raises questions concerning the use of national averages to inform the education policies in specific regions of the country. More validated measures of demand are needed for future studies.     

Teaching the teachers: helping faculty in a family practice residency improve their informatics skills.

Faculty members in family practice residencies are increasingly being asked to help residents develop skills in the use of informatics and evidence-based medicine (EBM). In order to do this successfully the teachers themselves must be skilled in the use of these tools. Recognizing the need for such training, the Maine Medical Center Family Practice Residency Program designed a faculty development project to increase knowledge and skills in the use of information technology. This project, which was carried out in 1999-2001, utilized a multifaceted approach that included improving the residency's technology infrastructure, conducting two instructional workshops, and offering EBM mentoring for preceptors. Faculty members also designed and carried out independent informatics projects. Pre- and post-project assessments of faculty members demonstrated a significant improvement in computer and EBM skills, and informal feedback from residents indicates that these skills have been successfully applied to the faculty members' teaching of residents and their practice of family medicine. This project had a positive impact on the faculty members in the residency program, increasing both their ability to employ information technology in individual and group teaching sessions and their use of EBM in clinical practice. Also, the culture within the residency program has been changed to one of utilizing computers and the Internet as principal resources for up-to-date information.     

Academic ranks and medical schools of underrepresented minority faculty in family medicine departments.

PURPOSE: To examine academic rankings and educational backgrounds of underrepresented minority (URM) family medicine faculty and compare their academic ranks with national trends. The authors also determined the extent to which international and historically black educational institutions contributed URM faculty to family medicine. METHOD: In 1999 questionnaires were sent to 129 family medicine departments asking for academic ranks and educational institutions attended by their URM faculty. Comparisons were made between URM faculty's academic ranks and all family medicine faculty, medical school minority faculty, and medical school faculty. RESULTS: A total of 80% of URM faculty were assistant professors or instructors, and 4.4% were professors. URM family medicine faculty had significantly lower rankings compared with medical school minority faculty and all family medicine faculty. URM family medicine faculty at historically black medical schools were more likely to have received their degrees from historically black undergraduate institutions and medical schools than were URM family medicine faculty at non-historically-black medical schools. CONCLUSIONS: URM family medicine faculty appear to experience a double disadvantage: being minority and working for family medicine departments. Their academic ranks remain far below those of both minority medical school faculty and family medicine faculty, a discouraging finding considering the current shortage of URM faculty in family medicine departments. Historically black medical schools cannot address the shortage alone, so non-historically-black medical schools need to both recruit URM faculty and follow up with appropriate mentoring of those faculty.