Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancer?

Background

The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying residual disease after breast conservation therapy (BCT) is unclear.

Method

Review of an institutional database identified patients with positive or close (≤2 mm) margins undergoing MRI before re-excision. Histopathologic correlation was performed.

Results

Forty-three women underwent MRI after BCT. MRI suggested residual disease in 29 patients, of whom 20 (69%) had residual carcinoma pathologically. Nine patients had false-positive MRI as seen by benign pathology findings. Fourteen MRIs indicated no residual disease, of which 6 had residual disease pathologically. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of MRI was 77% and 69%, respectively. MRI conducted within 28 days of the original surgery was 85% sensitive. MRI performed after 28 days was 69% sensitive.

Conclusions

MRI is able to detect residual disease among most patients undergoing re-excision. False-positive results may be caused by inflammatory processes that resemble residual disease.     

Does preoperative magnetic resonance imaging beneficially alter surgical management of invasive lobular carcinoma?

The role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer remains controversial. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of preoperative breast MRI on patients with biopsy-proven invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) initially deemed eligible for breast conserving therapy. We analyzed a prospective cohort study of patients with biopsy-proven ILC that consented to undergo preoperative diagnostic MRI at our institution. Data analysis of 20 patients accrued from January 2010 through January 2011 was performed. Outcome measures included discovery of occult lesions, need for additional biopsies, change in surgical management, and need for surgical reexcision. MRI found an additional cancer in 40 per cent of patients and increased extent of disease in one patient. MRI led to eight biopsies, for a pathologically confirmed true positive rate of 82 per cent [95% confidence interval (CI) 62-101%] and only two unnecessary biopsies. Preoperative MRI beneficially altered surgical management in 42 per cent of patients (95% CI 19-65%) without leading to unnecessary surgery, and only one patient required reexcision for positive margins (5.8%, CI -5.8-17.4%). In conclusion, preoperative MRI in patients with ILC can detect additional disease that was missed by conventional workup, allowing for better preoperative planning and more appropriate oncologic resection.     

Cervical radiculopathy: discrepancy or concordance between electromyography and magnetic resonance imaging?

In the screening of patients with cervical radiculopathy, a relatively common finding is the discrepancy between normal needle electromyography (EMG) and abnormal MRI, or vice versa. We carried out a retrospective study to assess the relationship between needle EMG and MRI findings in the preoperative evaluation of patients with cervical radiculopathy. The records of 147 patients were reviewed; 58 patients (M = 32, F = 26; age 53 ± 9) were included in the study. Needle EMG examination was abnormal in 28 patients. MRI abnormalities were found in all 58 patients, showing degenerative changes not affecting the nerve root in 15 and foraminal stenosis affecting the nerve root in 43; in the latter, needle EMG was abnormal in 28 patients and normal in the remainder. Concordance between EMG and MRI level of abnormality was found in 71% of patients with non-dermatomal symptom distribution. Concordance between clinical level, EMG and MRI abnormality was found in 50% of patients with C5, in 70% with C6 and in 67% with C7 symptom distribution. When EMG and MRI level of abnormality was discordant, the EMG abnormalities corresponded to the clinical level of symptom distribution. The results of our retrospective study reveal that in the majority of cases of cervical radiculopathy, EMG and MRI level of abnormalities are concordant. When there is discordance between EMG and MRI findings, the EMG helps in the guidance of patient selection for surgical intervention because it provides evidence of nerve root lesion and offers a dynamic tool in the follow-up evaluation.     

Does breast cancer tumor size really matter that much?

Tumor size should be taken into consideration when planning treatments, but final decisions should also be made on the basis of the biological characteristics of the tumor in order to achieve a personalized approach to each individual cancer and to offer the best possible treatment to each patient.     

Is supraspinatus pathology as defined by magnetic resonance imaging associated with clinical sign of shoulder impingement?

To examine the association between supraspinatus pathology and clinical sign of impingement, 42 workers with and 31 age-matched workers without signs of subacromial impingement had their shoulder examined by magnetic resonance imaging. All subjects were selected from an epidemiologic study evaluating the risk of shoulder impingement syndrome in relation to ergonomic exposure. Physical examination was conducted according to the same protocol and included assessment of shoulder function. Magnetic resonance images were evaluated in a blinded manner with regard to clinical status and age. Twenty-two (55%) subjects in the impingement group and 16 (52%) subjects in the control group had a pathologic supraspinatus tendon (odds ratio 1.13 [95% confidence interval 0.45 to 2.88]). The prevalence of supraspinatus pathology increased from 32% in the youngest to 48% in the middle and 72% in the oldest age group. The results of this study indicate that supraspinatus pathology is related to age rather than to clinical sign of impingement.     

Pathologic correlates of false positive breast magnetic resonance imaging findings: which lesions warrant biopsy?

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly sensitive for breast cancer. However, adoption of breast MRI is hampered by frequent false positive (FP) findings. Though ultimately proven benign, these suspicious findings require biopsy due to abnormal morphology and/or kinetic enhancement curves that simulate malignancy on MRI. We hypothesized that analysis of a series of FP MRI findings could reveal a pattern of association between certain "suspicious" lesions and benign disease that might help avoid unnecessary biopsy of such lesions in the future. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified women undergoing breast MRI between June 1995 and March 2002 with FP findings identified by MRI alone. Lesions were retrospectively characterized according to an MRI Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System lexicon and matched to pathology. RESULTS: Twenty-two women were identified with 29 FP lesions. Morphology revealed 1 focus (3.5%), 5 masses less than 5 mm (17%), 11 masses greater than 5 mm (38%), 1 (3.5%) linear enhancement, and 11 (38%) non-mass-like enhancement. Kinetic curves were suspicious in 15 (52%). Histology demonstrated 20 (69%) variants of normal tissue and 9 (31%) benign masses. MRI lesions less than 5 mm (n = 6, 20.5%) were small, well-delineated nodules of benign breast tissue. CONCLUSION: Suspicious MRI lesions less than 5 mm often represent benign breast tissue and could potentially undergo surveillance instead of biopsy.