Contribution of endothelin receptors and cyclooxygenase-derivatives to the altered response of the rabbit renal artery to endothelin-1 in diabetes

The influence of diabetes on regulatory mechanisms and specific receptors implicated in the response of isolated rabbit renal artery to endothelin-1 was examined. Endothelin-1 induced a concentration-dependent contraction that was less potent in arteries from diabetic rabbits than in arteries from control rabbits. Endothelium removal or N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG) enhanced contractions to endothelin-1 either in control and diabetic arteries. Indomethacin inhibited endothelin-1-induced response in control arteries, but enhanced it in diabetic arteries. In contrast to that observed in rubbed and in L-NOARG treated arteries, in the presence of indomethacin the contractile action of endothelin-1 was higher in diabetic arteries than in control arteries. Nimesulide enhanced endothelin-1 contractions both in control and diabetic arteries. Cyclo-(D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-D-Trp) (BQ-123, endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist), attenuated endothelin-1 vasoconstriction in control rabbits, while vasoconstriction resulted increased in diabetic rabbits. 2,6-Dimethylpiperidinecarbonyl-gamma-Methyl-Leu-N(in)-(Methoxycarbonyl)-D-Trp-D-Nle (BQ-788, endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist), enhanced the contractile response in control rabbit arteries without modifying this response in diabetic rabbits. In summary, diabetes decreases the sensitivity of the rabbit renal artery to endothelin-1 by decreasing the ratio between vasoconstrictor and vasodilator prostanoids released after activation of endothelin ET(A) receptors.     

Different role of endothelin ETA and ETB receptors and endothelial modulators in diabetes-induced hyperreactivity of the rabbit carotid artery to endothelin-1

The influence of diabetes on regulatory mechanisms and specific receptors implicated in the contractile response of isolated rabbit carotid arteries to endothelin-1 was examined. Endothelin-1 induced a concentration-dependent contraction that was greater in arteries from diabetic rabbits than in arteries from control rabbits. Endothelium removal or N(G)-nitro-L-arginine enhanced contractions in response to endothelin-1 only in control arteries, without modifying the endothelin-1 response in diabetic arteries. Indomethacin, furegrelate (thromboxane A(2) inhibitor), or cyclo-(D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-D-Trp) (BQ-123; endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist) inhibited the contractions in response to endothelin-1, the inhibition being greater in diabetic arteries than in control arteries. 2,6-Dimethylpiperidinecarbonyl-gamma-methyl-Leu-N(in)-(methoxycarbonyl)-D-Trp-D-Nle (BQ-788; endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist) enhanced the contraction elicited by endothelin-1 in control arteries and displaced to the right the contractile curve for endothelin-1 in diabetic arteries. In summary, diabetes induces hyperreactivity of the rabbit carotid artery to endothelin-1 by a mechanism that at least includes: (1) enhanced activity of muscular endothelin ET(A) receptors; (2) impairment of endothelin ET(B) receptor-mediated nitric oxide (NO) release; and (3) enhancement of the production of thromboxane A(2).     

Synergistic inhibition by BQ-123 and BQ-788 of endothelin-1-induced contractions of the rabbit pulmonary artery.

In the rabbit isolated pulmonary artery, neither the ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (10 microM), nor the ETB receptor antagonist, BQ-788 (10 microM), inhibited the contractions induced by 1 nM endothelin-1 (ET-1). However, the combination of BQ-123 and BQ-788 completely inhibited the ET-1-induced contraction. In contrast, the ETB-selective agonist, sarafotoxin S6c (1 nM)-induced contraction was completely inhibited by BQ-788 but not by BQ-123. In receptor binding assays, [125I]-ET-1 specific binding to pulmonary arterial membranes was inhibited by BQ-123 (1 microM) by approximately 20% and additive treatment with BQ-788 (1 microM) completely inhibited the BQ-123-resistant component of [125I]-ET-1 specific binding. The present study demonstrates synergistic inhibition by BQ-123 and BQ-788 of ET-1-induced contraction of the rabbit pulmonary artery and the coexistence of ETA and ETB receptors, suggesting that the activation of either only ETA or only ETB receptors may be sufficient to cause complete vasoconstriction. Therefore, blockade of both receptor subtypes would be necessary for the inhibition of some ETA/ETB composite types of responses.     

Selective opioid receptor agonist and antagonist displacement of [3H]naloxone binding in amphibian brain

Vascular responses to endothelin peptides have been proposed to be mainly mediated via subtypes of the endothelin receptor, endothelin ET_A1, endothelin ET_B1, and endothelin ET_B2. The antagonist activity of 27-O-3-[2-(3-carboxy-acryloylamino)-5-hydroxyphenyl]acryloyloxy myricerone, sodium salt (S-0139) at these endothelin receptor subtypes was evaluated using isolated rabbit femoral, pulmonary, and mesenteric arteries. S-0139 competitively antagonized the endothelin-1-induced contraction mediated by the endothelin ET_A1 receptor in endothelium-denuded rabbit femoral arteries with a pA₂ value of 8.6±0.1. Endothelin ET_B2 receptor-mediated contraction induced by sarafotoxin S6c in endothelium-denuded rabbit pulmonary arteries was also inhibited by S-0139 with a pA₂ value of 5.6±0.1. The pA₂ value of S-0139 for the endothelin ET_B1 receptor, evaluated from the endothelin-3-induced relaxant response in endothelium-intact rabbit mesenteric arteries, was 6.2±0.2. In isolated canine basilar, coronary, mesenteric and renal arteries, endothelin-1 caused concentration-dependent contractions with EC₅₀ values of 0.49±0.07, 0.61±0.25, 0.92±0.21 and 1.18±0.24 nM, respectively. S-0139 antagonized the endothelin-1-induced contraction in these arteries with pA₂ values of 8.0±0.1, 7.6±0.2, 7.6±0.2 and 7.6±0.1, respectively. These results suggest that S-0139 is a potent and selective endothelin ET_A1 receptor antagonist, and that the contractions induced by endothelin-1 in canine basilar, coronary, mesenteric and renal arteries are mediated mainly via the endothelin ET_A1 receptor subtype.     

Arteries and veins desensitize differently to endothelin

Hypertension is accompanied by increased arterial endothelin-1 (ET-1) and decreased arterial contraction to ET-1. By contrast, veins remain responsive to ET-1 in hypertension. Isometric contraction was used to test the hypothesis that veins do not desensitize to ET-1 to the extent of arteries, possibly because of the presence of functional ETA and ETB receptors on veins and only functional ETA receptors on arteries. Contraction to ET-1 after exposure to ET-1 (100 nmol/L) was abolished in aortae, while in veins 36.3 +/- 0.2% of maximal contraction to ET-1 remained. Aortae were unresponsive to the ETA receptor agonist ET-1(1-31) (100 nmol/L) after ET-1 exposure, while 21.9 +/- 0.6% of maximum venous contraction to ET-1 (1-31) remained. In a similar manner, the venous ETB receptor did not lose responsiveness to the ETB receptor agonist sarafotoxin 6c (S6c, 100 nmol/L); aortae did not contract to S6c. In ET-1-desensitized veins, the ETB receptor antagonist BQ-788 (100 nmol/L) decreased maximum contraction to ET-1, but did not alter potency (-log EC50 control = 8.14 +/- 0.01 mol/L; BQ-788 = 8.13 +/- 0.04 mol/L). The ETA receptor antagonist atrasentan (100 nmol/L) blocked remaining venous contraction to ET-1 (control = 8.05 +/- 0.05 mol/L; atrasentan = unmeasurable). Maintained responsiveness to ET-1 in veins occurs primarily via the ETA receptor, while in arteries the ETA receptor is responsible for desensitization to ET-1.     

Endothelin-1 (ET-1)-induced contraction in rat isolated trachea: involvement of ETA and ETB receptors and multiple signal transduction systems.

1. Quantitative autoradiographic, biochemical and functional studies were performed to investigate the endothelin receptor subtypes and signal transduction systems that mediate endothelin-1 (ET-1)-induced contraction in rat isolated tracheal smooth muscle. 2. Specific binding of 0.5 nM [125I]-ET-1 to tracheal smooth muscle was inhibited by at least 40% in the presence of either the ETA receptor selective ligand BQ-123 (1 microM) or the ETB receptor-selective ligand sarafotoxin S6c (30 nM), indicating the presence of both ETA and ETB receptors in this tissue. 3. ET-1 and sarafotoxin S6c were both potent spasmogens of rat isolated tracheal smooth muscle preparations. Sarafotoxin S6c-induced contractions were unaffected in the presence of the ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 (10 microM), but were markedly attenuated in tissue previously exposed to 100 nM sarafotoxin S6c to induce ETB receptor desensitization. ET-1-induced contractions were, at most, only partially attenuated either by blocking the ETA receptor-effector system (with 10 microM BQ-123) or by desensitizing the ETB receptor-effector system with sarafotoxin S6c. However, ET-1-induced contractions were markedly attenuated by blocking both receptor-effector systems simultaneously. These findings suggest that ET-1 could induce contraction by stimulating either ETA or ETB receptors. 4. ET-1 (10 microM) induced a 7 fold increase in intracellular [3H]-inositol phosphate accumulation over basal levels in rat isolated tracheal smooth muscle. In contrast, sarafotoxin S6c (2.5 microM) increased intracellular [3H]-inositol phosphate accumulation by only 2 fold. ET-1-induced accumulation of [3H]-inositol phosphates was abolished by 10 microM BQ-123.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mechanism of rat uterine smooth muscle contraction induced by endothelin-1.

1. Endothelin (ET)-1 has been demonstrated to cause contraction of uterine smooth muscle. We investigated the role of ET receptor subtypes (ETA and ETB receptors) in ET-1-induced contraction of rat uterine smooth muscle by using the ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 and the ETB receptor agonist BQ-3020. 2. ET-1 caused a contraction with superimposed oscillations of the rat isolated uterus suspended in Krebs-Ringer solution; both the amplitude of contraction as well as the oscillation frequency increased in a dose-dependent manner (10(-11)-10(-7)M). 3. BQ-123 (10(-6)M) markedly shifted the dose-response curve of ET-1 for both contractile effects and oscillation frequency to the right. 4. BQ-3020 (10(-11)-3 x 10(-7) M) did not cause uterine contraction; neither did it affect the dose-response curve of ET-1 for either the contractile effect or the increase in oscillation frequency. Thus, stimulation of ETB receptors is not involved in these responses. 5. The present findings suggest that ET-1-induced contractile responses and the increase in oscillation frequency in rat uterine smooth muscle is mediated through ETA receptors, and that ETB receptors play no role in these responses.     

Endothelin ETB receptors inhibit articular nociception and priming induced by carrageenan in the rat knee-joint

The participation of the endothelin system on nociception and priming induced by carrageenan in the knee-joint was investigated. Intra-articular (i.a.) carrageenan (300 microg) caused long-lasting nociceptive effects (i.e., increases in paw elevation time [PET]), which were potentiated by endothelin-1 (dual endothelin ETA/ETB receptor agonist) and inhibited by sarafotoxin S6c (endothelin ETB receptor agonist; both at 30 pmol, i.a., 24 h beforehand). Priming the naive joint with carrageenan augmented nociceptive responses to a second carrageenan challenge, 72 h later. Carrageenan-induced priming, but not nociception, was potentiated by local BQ-788 (10 nmol, i.a., 15 min before priming; endothelin ETB receptor antagonist; N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D-1-methoxycarbonyl-tryptophanil-D-norleucine), but BQ-123 (endothelin ETA receptor antagonist; cyclo [D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu]) was ineffective. Sarafotoxin S6c markedly suppressed carrageenan-induced priming to nociception triggered by carrageenan, endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin S6c, and BQ-788 prevented this action. Thus, selective endothelin ETB receptor agonists inhibit carrageenan-induced nociception and priming in the naive joint. This priming effect of carrageenan to nociception evoked by subsequent inflammatory insults is limited by an endothelin ETB receptor-operated mechanism.     

Differential effects of BQ-123 against endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 on the rat vas deferens: evidence for an atypical endothelin receptor.

1. Endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 enhanced concentration-dependently the rat vas deferens twitch response to electrical stimulation, endothelin-1 being three times more potent. Sarafotoxin S6c was at least 200 times less active than endothelin-1. 2. The response to endothelin was antagonized in a competitive manner by the supposedly selective ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (pA2:7.0 +/- 0.1). In contrast, the endothelin-1 concentration-response curve was only shifted two fold in the presence of 10 microM BQ-123, while no effect was observed at 1 microM. 3. This evidence suggests the rat vas deferens contains an endothelin receptor not conforming to the ETA/ETB receptor subtype classification so far proposed.     

Time course of changes in ETB receptor density and function in tracheal airway smooth muscle during respiratory tract viral infection in mice.

1. In the current study, the density and function of ETA and ETB receptors in mouse tracheal airway smooth muscle were determined over the time course of respiratory tract infection with influenza A/PR-8/34 virus. 2. Quantitative autoradiographic studies using [125I]-endothelin-1 revealed that the tracheal airway smooth muscle from control mice contained ETA and ETB sites in the ratio of 49%:51% (+/- 2%, n = 29 mice). Respiratory tract viral infection was associated with increases in the density of ETA sites and decreases in the density of ETB sites at days 1, 2 and 4 post-inoculation which were reversible by day 19. For example, at day 4 post-inoculation, a time when the manifestations of viral infection were at or near their peak, the ratio of ETA:ETB sites was 72%:28% (+/- 4%, n = 6 mice, P < 0.05). In contrast, at day 19 post-inoculation, by which time viral infection had essentially resolved, the ratio of ETA:ETB sites was similar to control (51%:49% (+/- 3%), n = 6 mice). 3. Endothelin-1 was a potent spasmogen in isolated tracheal airway smooth muscle preparations from control mice (ED70 = concentration producing 70% of contraction induced by 10 microM carbachol = 6.3 nM (95% confidence limits, 4.0-10; n = 6 mice)). Neither the ETA receptor-selective antagonist, BQ-123 (3 microM), nor the ETB receptor-selective antagonist, BQ-788 (1 microM) alone had any significant inhibitory effect on endothelin-1-induced contractions of mouse isolated tracheal smooth muscle. However, simultaneous treatment with BQ-123 (3 microM) and BQ-788 (1 microM) resulted in a 10 fold rightward shift in the concentration-effect curve to endothelin-1 (ED70 = 60 nM, (44-90; n = 6 mice, P < 0.05)), indicating that contraction was mediated via both ETA and ETB receptors. 4. Endothelin-1 evoked similar concentration-dependent contractions of tracheal smooth muscle isolated from control and virus-inoculated mice. In the presence of the ETB receptor-selective-antagonist, BQ-788 (1 microM), the potency and maximum response to endothelin-1 were similar in preparations from control and virus-inoculated mice at all time points investigated. However, unlike control responses, endothelin-1-induced contractions in preparations from virus-infected mice were significantly inhibited by the ETA receptor-selective antagonist, BQ-123. For example, at day 4 post-inoculation, the contractile response to 30 nM endothelin-1, in the presence of BQ-123 (3 microM), was only 20 +/- 12% (n = 6 mice, P < 0.05) of that produced in control preparations under similar conditions. However, at day 19 post-inoculation, contraction evoked by 30 nM endothelin-1 in the presence of BQ-123 (3 microM), was similar to that in preparations from control mice. 5. In summary, during the early stages (days 1-8 post-inoculation) of respiratory tract infection with influenza A/PR-8/34 virus, we observed decreases in the density of tracheal airway smooth muscle ETB receptors which were reflected in decreases in ETB receptor-mediated airway smooth muscle contraction. In addition, during the same period of viral infection we observed increases in the density of tracheal airway smooth muscle ETA receptors which were not associated with increased function of the ETA receptor-effector system linked to contraction. Virus-associated modulation of ETA and ETB receptor density and function was reversible with recovery from infection.     

Difference in the characteristics of ETA-receptor-stimulated response between rat small pulmonary and renal arteries

We investigated the difference in the characteristics of endothelin-1 (ET-1)-induced contraction and the responses of intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) between rat small pulmonary artery and renal artery. ET-1 (30 nM) failed to elicit any contraction in renal arteries pretreated with 3 microM BQ-123, an ETA blocker. However, in the pulmonary artery a combination of BQ-123 and BQ-788, an ETB blocker (5 microM each), only partially inhibited the ET-1-induced contraction (by 25%). To focus on the ETA receptor, in the presence of 5 microM BQ-788, nitric oxide donors (sodium nitroprusside and (+/-)-S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine) and forskolin reduced both the ET-1-induced contraction and increase in [Ca(2+)](i) in both pulmonary and renal arteries. However, the effects were stronger in the renal than in the pulmonary artery. ET-1-induced increase in [Ca(2+)](i) was only partially attenuated by 10 microM verapamil (to 81% of control) in pulmonary arteries but was reduced to 56.1% of control in renal arteries. Our results provide evidence that ET-1 may activate ET receptor(s) insensitive to both BQ-123 and BQ-788 in rat small pulmonary artery, at least under these conditions. Furthermore, the effects of relaxants such as L-type Ca(2+) channel blocker and nitric oxide donors on the ET-1-induced contraction were studied.     

Pharmacological evidence for distinct endothelin receptors in guinea-pig bronchus and aorta.

The ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (1 microM) potently antagonized endothelin-1 (ET-1) concentration-response curves in guinea-pig aorta (pKB = 7.1). However, 10 microM BQ-123 was without effect on ET-1-induced contractions in guinea-pig bronchus. The ETB-selective agonist, sarafotoxin S6c did not contract the aorta but was a potent and effective contractile agonist in the bronchus. BQ-123 (10 microM) was without effect on sarafotoxin S6c-induced contractions in the bronchus. These data provide evidence for distinct endothelin receptors in guinea-pig aorta and bronchus, which appear to be predominantly of the ETA and non-ETA, perhaps ETB, subtypes, respectively.     

Upregulation of vascular ET(B) receptor gene expression after chronic ET(A) receptor blockade in prediabetic NOD mice

In the aorta of prediabetic non-obese diabetic mice, a model of human type 1 diabetes, we investigated gene expression of the endothelin receptors and contractility to big endothelin-1 and endothelin-1 at the ages of 10 and 16 weeks. A subgroup of 10- week-old animals was treated with the endothelin ETA receptor antagonist LU461314 (30 mg/kg per day for 6 weeks). Blood glucose levels were normal in all animals. Real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that vascular ETB receptor expression was higher in 10-week-old non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice compared with controls. In 16-week-old NOD mice, but not in control mice, ETB receptor mRNA was twofold lower (P < 0.05 vs 10-week-old NOD mice). In all groups ETA receptor expression was unaffected by age or treatment. Contractions to big endothelin-1 and endothelin-1 were lower in 10-week-old NOD mice compared with controls. Treatment with LU461314 increased ETB receptor expression in 16-week-old NOD mice, but had no effect on vascular contractility. These data indicate that dysregulation of ETB receptor expression and a decreased contractile response to big endothelin-1 and endothelin-1 are present in the prediabetic state of a model of human type 1 diabetes. These alterations occur independent of glucose levels. Furthermore, ETA receptor blockade is effective in increasing ETB receptor gene expression, suggesting a potential role for endothelin ETA antagonists in the treatment of type 1 diabetes.     

Block of endothelin-1-induced release of thromboxane A2 from the guinea pig lung and nitric oxide from the rabbit kidney by a selective ETB receptor antagonist, BQ-788.

1. The present study characterizes the receptors responsible for endothelin-1-induced release of thromboxane A2 from the guinea pig lung and of endothelium-derived nitric oxide from the rabbit perfused kidney, by the use of the selective ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123, and a novel selective ETB receptor antagonist, BQ-788. 2. In the guinea pig perfused lung, endothelin-1 (ET-1) (5 nM) induced a marked increase of thromboxane A2 which was reduced by 17 +/- 5.0, 70 +/- 1.0 and 93 +/- 1.2% by BQ-788 infused at concentrations of 1, 5 and 10 nM respectively. In contrast, BQ-123 (0.1 and 1.0 microM) had little or no effect on the ET-1-induced release of thromboxane A2. 3. In the same perfused model, the selective ETB agonist, IRL 1620 (50 nM), stimulated the release of thromboxane A2, but not prostacyclin. The eicosanoid-releasing properties of IRL 1620 were abolished by BQ-788 at 10 nM, yet were unaffected by BQ-123 (1 microM). 4. In the rabbit perfused kidney, BQ-788 (10 nM) potentiated the increase of perfusion pressure induced by endothelin-1 (1, 5 and 10 nM) by approximately 90%, but not that induced by angiotensin II (1 microM). Furthermore, the selective ETB receptor antagonist did not reduce the release of prostacyclin triggered by either peptide. 5. In another series of experiments, pretreatment of the perfused kidney with a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NAME (100 microM), potentiated the pressor responses to both endothelin-1 and angiotensin II. Under L-NAME treatment, BQ-788 did not further potentiate the pressor response to endothelin-1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Necessity of dual blockade of endothelin ETA and ETB receptor subtypes for antagonism of endothelin-1-induced contraction in human bronchi.

1. Endothelin (ET)-1 has been postulated to be involved in the development of obstructive airway diseases in man. In the present study, we attempted to characterize ET receptor subtypes mediating ET-1-induced contraction in human isolated bronchi. The ET receptor antagonists used in the present study were BQ-123 (ETA receptor-selective), BQ-788 (ETB receptor-selective) and BQ-928 (ETA/ETB dual). Sarafotoxin S6c (S6c) was also used as an ETB receptor-selective agonist. 2. In human bronchi, ET-1 and S6c (10(-12)M to 10(-7) M) produced concentration-dependent contraction with almost equal potency (pD2: 8.88 +/- 0.16 for ET-1 and 9.42 +/- 0.15 for S6c). The contraction induced by S6c was competitively antagonized by BQ-788 alone (1 and 10 microM) with a pKB value of 7.49 +/- 0.21, suggesting that the stimulation of ETB receptors causes a contraction of human bronchi. However, contrary to expectation, the concentration-response curves for ET-1 were not affected by BQ-788. The ET-1- and S6c-induced contractions were not affected by BQ-123 (10 microM). Thus, ET-1-induced contraction of human bronchi is not antagonized by BQ-123 alone or by BQ-788 alone. 3. Combined treatment with 10 microM BQ-123 and 10 microM BQ-788 significantly antagonized the contraction induced by ET-1 with a dose-ratio of 11. BQ-928 also significantly antagonized ET-1-induced contraction with a pKB value of 6.32 +/- 0.24. 4. The specific binding of [125I]-ET-1 to human bronchial membrane preparations was inhibited by BQ-123 (100 pM to 1 microM) by approximately 40%. Combination treatment with BQ-788 (100 pM to 1 microM) completely inhibited the BQ-123-resistant component of [125I]-ET-1 specific binding. 5. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that BQ-788 alone cannot inhibit ET-1-induced contractions in human bronchi, although human bronchial ETB receptors are BQ-788-sensitive. Furthermore, it was shown that blockade of both receptor subtypes antagonizes ET-1-induced contraction, and that both receptor subtypes co-exist in human bronchial smooth muscles. These findings suggest that ETA receptors as well as ETB receptors are involved in ET-1-induced contraction in human bronchi. If ET-1 is involved in human airway diseases, dual blockade of ETA and ETB receptors may be necessary to treat the diseases.     

The effect of the endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist CI-1020 on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.

The mechanism of Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction is unknown. The role of endothelin-1 in hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction was studied in precontracted small and large pulmonary arteries using the endothelin ETA receptor antagonist sodium-2-benzol [1,3]dioxol-5-yl-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-oxo-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxy-ben zyl)-but-2-enoate (CI-1020). Small rat pulmonary arteries exhibit a mixed endothelin ETA receptor and endothelin ETB2 receptor population whereas large rat pulmonary arteries contain only endothelin ETA receptors. CI-1020 inhibited endothelin-1 in small vessels via endothelin ETA receptor blockade (1 and 10 microM) and at high concentrations via endothelin ETA receptor and endothelin ETB2 receptor blockade (100 microM). CI-1020 (0.01, 0.1 and 1 microM) inhibited endothelin-1 in large vessels via endothelin ETA receptor blockade alone. CI-1020 (1, 10 and 100 microM) significantly reduced hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in small vessels, by -9.8+/-1.4, -9.2+/-2.3 and -8.0+/-1.7% 80 mM K+, respectively, compared to +2.5+/-4.2% with vehicle (P < 0.05). CI-1020 (0.01, 0.1 and 1 microM) had no significant effect upon hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in large vessels. In small, but not large, pulmonary arteries hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is due in part to the action of endothelin-1 at the endothelin ETA receptor.     

The endothelin system in Morris hepatoma-7777: an endothelin receptor antagonist inhibits growth in vitro and in vivo

1. Plasma concentrations of endothelin are increased in patients with hepatocellular cancer as well as in patients with liver metastasis. However, the impact of these findings remains uncertain. 2. We thus analyzed the endothelin system in a rat hepatoma model (Morris hepatoma 7777) in vitro and in vivo. 3. Our study revealed that tissue concentrations of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and big-ET-1, the precursor of ET-1, were significantly elevated in Morris hepatoma 7777 as compared to normal liver. The ETA receptor density was significantly elevated, whereas the density of the ETB receptor was decreased in Morris hepatoma 7777. 4. We could also demonstrate that hepatoma cells secrete ET-1. 5. Exogenously added ET-1 enhances hepatoma cell growth in a dose-dependent manner. Endothelin receptor antagonists (ETA and combined ETA/ETB receptor antagonists) inhibit tumor cell growth in vitro. Since the combined ETA/ETB receptor antagonist was more effective in vitro, we used this compound also for in vivo studies and could demonstrate that a combined ETA/ETB receptor antagonist is able to reduce hepatoma growth in vivo. 6. In conclusion, the endothelin system is activated in Morris hepatoma 7777 and contributes to hepatoma growth. Since endothelin receptor antagonists are well-tolerated upcoming clinically used drugs without major side effects, our data might provide a new pharmacological approach to reduce hepatoma growth in vivo.     

Influence of regional differences in ETA and ETB receptor subtype proportions on endothelin-1-induced contractions in porcine isolated trachea and bronchus.

1. Quantitative autoradiographic studies were conducted to determine the distributions and densities of ETA and ETB binding site subtypes in porcine tracheal and bronchial smooth muscle. In addition, the roles of ETA and ETB receptors in endothelin-1-mediated contraction of these tissues were assessed. 2. Quantitative autoradiographic studies revealed that both ETA and ETB binding sites for [125I]-endothelin-1 were present in both bronchial and tracheal airway smooth muscle. However, the proportions of these sites were markedly different at these two levels within the respiratory tract. In tracheal smooth muscle, the proportions of ETA and ETB sites were 30 +/- 1% and 70 +/- 1% respectively, whereas in bronchial smooth muscle, these proportions were virtually reversed, being 73 +/- 2% and 32 +/- 8% respectively. 3. Endothelin-1 induced concentration-dependent contraction of porcine tracheal and bronchial airway smooth muscle. Endothelin-1 had similar potency (concentration producing 30% of the maximum carbachol contraction, Cmax) in trachea (22 nM; 95% confidence limits (c.l.), 9-55 nM; n = 9) and bronchus (22 nM; c.l., 9-55 nM; n = 6). Endothelin-1 also produced comparable maximal contractions in trachea (59 +/- 5% Cmax; n = 9) and bronchus (65 +/- 4% Cmax, n = 6). 4. In trachea, endothelin-1 induced contractions were not significantly inhibited by either the ETA receptor-selective antagonist, BQ-123 (3 microM) or the ETB receptor-selective antagonist, BQ-788 (1 microM). However, in the combined presence of BQ-123 and BQ-788, the concentration-effect curve to endothelin-1 was shifted to the right by 3.7 fold (n = 8; P = 0.01). 5. In bronchus, concentration-effect curves to endothelin-1 were shifted to the right by BQ-123 (3 microM; 4.3 fold; P < 0.05), but not by BQ-788 (1 microM). In the presence of both antagonists, concentration-effect curves to endothelin-1 were shifted by at least 6.7 fold (n = 6; P = 0.01). 6. Sarafotoxin S6c induced contraction in both tissue types, although the maximum contraction was greater in trachea (53 +/- 7% Cmax; n = 6) than in bronchus (21 +/- 5% Cmax; n = 6). BQ-788 (1 microM) markedly reduced sarafotoxin S6c potency in both trachea and bronchus (e.g. by 50 fold in trachea; c.l., 14-180; n = 6; P < 0.05). 7. These data demonstrate that the proportions of functional endothelin receptor subtypes mediating contraction of airway smooth muscle to endothelin-1, vary significantly at different levels in the porcine respiratory tract.     

Antagonism of endothelin action normalizes altered levels of VEGF and its signaling in the brain of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat

Stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) often suffer from spontaneous stroke, in part, due to abnormalities in the cerebrovasculature. Here, we investigate the profile of key angiogenic factors and their basic signaling molecules in the brain of SHRSP during the age-dependent stages of hypertension. The profile of VEGF and its receptor, Flk-1, was dependent on age and stage of hypertension (i.e., down regulated at pre-hypertensive and malignant hypertensive stages, but up regulated at typical hypertensive stage), while that of its downstream components, pAkt and eNOS, were down regulated in a time-dependent manner in the frontal cortex of SHRSP compared to age-matched genetic control, normotensive WKY rats. On the other hand, the expression of endothelin-1 and its type A receptor (endothelin ETA receptor) were up regulated, depending on age and stage of hypertension. In contrast, levels of endothelin type B receptor were down regulated. The regional cerebral blood flow decreased during the development of malignant hypertension. Thus, subsequent experiments were designed to investigate whether endothelin-1 receptor antagonism, using endothelin-A/-B dual receptor antagonist SB209670, could normalize the molecular profile of these factors in SHRSP brain. Interestingly, blockage of endothelin-1 receptor restored to normal, levels of cerebral endothelin-1, endothelin ETA receptor and endothelin ETB receptor; VEGF and Flk-1; endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and pAkt, in SHRSP, compared to age-matched WKY. Endothelin receptor blocker might be important to prevent the progression in the defect in VEGF and its angiogenic signaling cascade in the pathogenesis of hypertension-induced vascular remodeling in frontal cortex of SHRSP rats.