Treatment of symptomatic medial epicondyle nonunion: Case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTIONSymptomatic nonunion of humeral medial epicondyle can be problematic and difficult to treat due to high complication rates related to open reduction and internal fixation methods.PRESENTATION OF CASEWe described four patients with symptomatic medial humeral epicondyle nonunion who underwent open reduction and internal fixation.DISCUSSIONSymptomatic nonunion of humeral medial epicondyle is a rare entity. Surgical technique can be difficult because of anatomical and biomechanical factors. In the literature, there are a few cases of humeral medial epicondyle treated by open reduction and internal fixation.CONCLUSIONOpen reduction and internally fixation of the medial epicondyle nonunion with one cannulated screw results with improved elbow function.     

Comparison of outcome between nonoperative and operative treatment of medial epicondyle fractures

Background and purpose — Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment for displaced medial epicondyle fractures. We compared the results of nonoperative and operative treatment and calculated the incidence of medial epicondyle fractures in the pediatric census population.Patients and methods — 112 children under 16 years old who sustained > 2 mm displaced fracture of the medial epicondyle were treated in our institution between 2014 and 2019. 80/83 patients with 81 non-incarcerated fractures were available for minimum 1-year follow-up. 41 fractures were treated with immobilization only, 40 by open reduction and internal fixation, according to the preference of the attending surgeon. Outcome was assessed at mean 2.6 years (1–6) from injury with different patient-reported outcome measures. Elbow stability, range of motion, grip strength, and distal sensation were registered in 74/80 patients. Incidence was calculated for 7- to 15-year-olds.Results — Nonoperatively treated children had less pain according to the PedsQL Pediatric Pain Questionnaire (3 vs. 15, p = 0.01) with better cosmetic outcome (VAS 95 vs. 87, p = 0.007). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in respect of QuickDASH, PedsQL generic core scale, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, grip strength, carrying angle, elbow stability, or range of motion (p > 0.05). All 41 nonoperatively treated children returned to pre-injury sports; of the surgically treated 6/40 had to down-scale their sporting activities. The incidence of displaced (> 2 mm) fractures of the medial epicondyle in children aged 7–15 years was ≥ 3:100,000.Interpretation — Displaced fractures of the medial humeral epicondyle in children heal well with 3–4 weeks’ immobilization. Open reduction and screw fixation does not improve outcome.

Fractures of the medial humeral epicondyle have been reported to account for 12–20% of all pediatric elbow fractures, but the incidence is not known. Elbow dislocation is associated with 30–50% of these fractures (Gottschalk et al. 2012), with an incarceration rate of the fracture fragment into the elbow joint of 5–18%. Ulnar nerve lesions are registered in 10–16% of cases (Louhaem et al. 2010).Nonoperative treatment is advised in minimally displaced (< 2 mm) fractures of the medial humeral epicondyle, whereas surgery is recommended for fractures incarcerated in the elbow joint as well as for fractures that are either grossly unstable or where the ulnar nerve is entrapped (Smith 1950, Blount 1955, Maylahn and Fahey 1958, Bede et al. 1975, Gottschalk et al. 2012, Tarollo et al. 2015). Significant controversy concerning the treatment of displaced (3–15 mm) fractures exists, with some surgeons advocating early mobilization, some immobilization, and some internal fixation (Lee et al. 2005, Hughes et al. 2019, Pezzutti et al. 2020). It has also been suggested that competitive athletes or fractures occurring in combination with elbow dislocation should be treated surgically with a lower threshold than in children without sporting activities (Baety and Kasser 2014).The reported outcome of nonoperative and operative treatment in displaced fractures of the medial humeral epicondyle in terms of elbow function and complications has been similar (Farsetti et al. 2001, Biggers et al. 2015, Axibal et al. 2019).We compared subjective and objective outcomes and calculated the incidence of medial humeral epicondyle fractures in children treated either with immobilization or with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).     

Type four fracture of the medial epicondyle: a true indication for surgical intervention

Fourteen consecutive cases with type 4 fracture of the medial epicondyle were evaluated following open reduction and internal fixation of the displaced medial epicondyle. The mean age was 9.7 years (range 6–16) and the mean follow-up was 17.2 months (range 12–24). Operative treatment yielded excellent results with no loss of functional range of motion, residual deformity or instability. There were three cases with pre-operative symptoms of ulnar nerve injury which made a good recovery following neurolysis of the ulnar nerve. Type 4 fractures are commonly associated with intra-articular entrapment of the ulnar nerve and result from serious damage to the soft tissues on the medial side of the elbow. Assessing instability is therefore of key importance, as is the intra-operative gravity stress–valgus test in assessing instability.     

Comparison of Kirschner wires and AO cannulated screw internal fixation for displaced lateral humeral condyle fracture in children

Purpose

This retrospective study compares Kirschner wires versus 3.5-mm diameter AO cannulated screw internal fixation in treatment for the displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures.

Methods

The study included 62 patients (42 boys, 20 girls; mean age 6.93 years; age range two to 14 years) with displaced lateral humeral condyle fractures. All patients were treated by open reduction and Kirschner wires or cannulated screw fixation. The clinical outcomes were evaluated according to the criteria of Hardacre et al. The mean follow-up period was 39.4 months (range 21–95 months).

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcome between these two groups (P > 0.05). Five patients (16.7%) developed skin infection around K-wires, while no infection occurred in fracture with screws. An obvious lateral prominence occurred in 11 (36.7%) patients with K-wires and four (12.5%) patients with screws. Nine (30%) patients with K-wires and two (6.3%) patients with screws had a lack of 10° of extension of the elbow compared with the other side.

Conclusion

Both K-wires and cannulated screw fixation are effective in treatment for displaced lateral humeral condyle fracture. K-wires can pass through the ossific nucleus of capitulum without damaging it, but a longer period of external fixation and local skin care will be required. The screws can reduce the possibility of lateral prominence and promote the function of elbow by continuously stabilising the fracture, but a second operation is need for screw removal.     

Long-term results of treatment of fractures of the medial humeral epicondyle in children

BACKGROUND: The treatment of isolated, displaced fractures of the medial humeral epicondyle in children is controversial. Both plaster cast immobilization without reduction and open reduction and internal fixation have been advocated. The purpose of this long-term retrospective study was to analyze the functional and radiographic results of both nonsurgical and surgical management of these injuries. METHODS: Forty-two patients who had had an isolated fracture of the medial humeral epicondyle with displacement of >5 mm at an average age of twelve years (range, eight to fifteen years) were evaluated at an average age of forty-five years (range, thirty to sixty-one years). The patients were divided into three groups that were comparable with regard to the amount of fracture displacement, age at the time of the fracture, age at the time of follow-up, sports activities and occupation, and duration of follow-up. In Group I (nineteen patients), the fracture had been treated with a long-arm plaster cast without reduction of the displaced medial epicondyle. In Group II (seventeen patients), open reduction and internal fixation with either Kirschner wires or a T-nail had been performed. In Group III (six patients), the epicondylar fragment had been excised with suture reattachment of the tendons and the medial collateral ligament. RESULTS: According to a functional grading scale, there were sixteen good and three fair results in Group I. All but two patients were seen to have nonunion of the fragment on follow-up radiographs, but all had a normal result on valgus stress-testing of the elbow. The range of motion of the elbow was either normal or minimally decreased, and the grip strength of the ipsilateral hand was normal. There were fifteen good and two fair results in Group II. All patients had union of the medial epicondyle, with various radiographic deformities of the medial epicondyle, but the functional results were similar to those of the Group-I patients. The Group-III patients had four poor and two fair results. Four had constant pain at the elbow and paresthesias in the distribution of the ulnar nerve. One patient had a restricted range of motion of the elbow, four patients had an unstable elbow, and three patients had decreased grip strength of the ipsilateral hand. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, nonsurgical treatment of isolated fractures of the medial humeral epicondyle with between 5 and 15 mm of displacement yielded good long-term results similar to those obtained with open reduction and internal fixation. The nonunion of the epicondylar fragment that was present in most patients who had been treated only with a cast did not adversely affect the functional results. Surgical excision of the medial epicondylar fragment should be avoided because the long-term results are poor.     

Triceps-sparing approach for open reduction and internal fixation of neglected displaced supracondylar and distal humeral fractures in children

BackgroundSupracondylar humeral fractures are one of the most common skeletal injuries in children. In cases of displacement and instability, the standard procedure is early closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation. However, between 10 and 20 % of patients present late. According to the literature, patients with neglected fractures are those patients who presented for treatment after 14 days of injury. The delay is either due to lack of medical facilities or social and financial constraints. The neglected cases are often closed injuries with no vascular compromise. However, the elbow may still be tense and swollen with abrasions or crusts. In neglected cases, especially after early appearance of callus, there is no place for closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Traditionally, distal humeral fractures have been managed with surgical approaches that disrupt the extensor mechanism with less satisfactory functional outcome due to triceps weakness and elbow stiffness. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of delayed open reduction using the triceps-sparing approach and Kirschner wire fixation for treatment of neglected, displaced supracondylar and distal humeral fractures in children.ResultsAll fractures united in a mean duration of 7.2 weeks (range 5–10 weeks) with no secondary displacement or mal-union. Excellent results were found at the last follow-up in 13 of the 15 patients studied (86.66 %), while good results were found in two patients (13.33 %) according to the MEPI scale. According to the Mark functional criteria, there was one patient with a fair result (6.66 %).ConclusionThe results were very satisfactory if compared with traditional operative techniques, with many advantages including anatomical reduction and fixation of the fractures, avoidance of ulnar nerve injury, preservation of the extensor mechanism, decrease in incidence of myositis ossificans around the elbow and decrease in post-operative stiffness.

Level of evidence

IV.     

Fracture pattern characteristics and associated injuries of high-energy,large fragment,partial articular radial head fractures: a preliminary imaging analysis

BackgroundHigh-energy radial head injuries often present with a large partial articular displaced fragment with any number of surrounding injuries. The objective of the study was to determine the characteristics of large fragment, partial articular radial head fractures and determine any significant correlation with specific injury patterns.ResultsThe radial head fracture fragments were most commonly within the AL quadrant (16/25; 64 %). Seven fracture fragments were in the AM quadrant and two in the PM quadrant. The fragment size averaged 42.5 % of the articular surface and spanned an average angle of 134.4^°. Significant differences were noted between AM (49.5 %) and AL (40.3 %) fracture fragment size with the AM fragments being larger. Seventeen cases had associated coronoid fractures. Of the total 25 cases, 13 had fracture dislocations while 12 remained reduced following the injury. The rate of dislocation was highest in radial head fractures that involved the AM quadrant (6/7; 85.7 %) compared to the AL quadrant (7/16; 43.7 %). No dislocations were observed with PM fragments. Ten of the 13 (78 %) fracture dislocations had associated lateral collateral ligament (LCL)/medial collateral ligament tear. The most common associated injuries were coronoid fractures (68 %), dislocations (52 %), and LCL tears (44 %).ConclusionThe most common location for partial articular radial head fractures is the AL quadrant. The rate of elbow dislocation was highest in fractures involving the AM quadrant. Cases with large fragment, partial articular radial head fractures should undergo a CT scan; if associated with >30 % or >120^° fracture arc, then the patient should be assessed closely for obvious or occult instability. These are key associations that hopefully greatly aid in the consultation and preoperative planning settings.

Level of evidence

Diagnostic III.     

A comparative study of two percutaneous pinning techniques (lateral vs medial–lateral) for Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus

BackgroundThe management of displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus with closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation is the most widely accepted method of treatment, but controversy continues regarding the pin fixation techniques. A prospective randomized controlled study was undertaken to compare the stability, functional outcome and iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury between lateral pin fixation and medial–lateral pin fixation.ResultsThere were two (6.5 %) iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury cases in the medial–lateral entry group and two (6.5 %) cases with mild loss of reduction in the lateral entry group. No major loss of reduction was observed in either of the groups. There was no statistically significant difference in change of Baumann angle, metaphyseal–diaphyseal angle, Flynn grade, carrying angle, and the total elbow range of motion (P < 0.05) between the two groups.ConclusionsLateral pin fixation offers similar functional and radiological outcome and almost equal mechanical stability compared with medial–lateral pinning without the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury.

Level of evidence [OCEBM 2011]

Level 2.     

Elbow dislocation with avulsion of the medial humeral epicondyle

After dislocation of the elbow with avulsion of the medial epicondyle, the management of the latter is controversial. Of 28 children followed up after initial closed reduction of the elbow, 19 had a satisfactory closed reduction of the epicondyle and were treated in plaster. At follow-up, 11 children had a normal elbow and eight had lost an average of 15 degrees of flexion. Nine children had had open reduction and internal fixation of the fragment, one for an open injury, three for displacement of the epicondyle and six for intra-articular entrapment of the fragment. Five of these children had ulnar nerve contusion or compression, four requiring anterior transposition of the nerve. At review, only three had normal elbows and six had lost an average of 37 degrees of flexion. We agree with other authors that surgery is indicated only for children in whom the epicondyle is trapped in the joint or is significantly displaced after closed reduction.     

Close Reduction Technique for Severely Displaced Radial Neck Fractures in Children

IntroductionRadial neck fractures account for 5–10% of paediatric elbow trauma. Radial neck fractures have been classified by Judet into five types (I–IVb). There is a global agreement to reduce radial neck fractures with angulation more than 30° (Type III, IVa and IVb). Various maneuvers have been described but none of them uniformly achieved complete reduction in severely displaced radial neck fractures (Type IVa and Type IVb Judet). In this case series, we are presenting our experience with close reduction of ten severely displaced paediatric radial neck fractures to achieve complete anatomical reduction.MethodsWe attempted close reduction in ten consecutive children with average age of 8.59 ± 1.68 years (range, 6–12 years) who presented with severely displaced radial neck fracture (Type IVa and IVb Judet). There were five girls. All patients had close injuries and presented to us within 24–48 h. One of the patients had associated undisplaced lateral condyle fracture. We have excluded two patients with associated elbow dislocation. Close reduction was performed within 48 h of initial injury.ResultsWe were able to obtain complete anatomical reduction in all of our patients with this technique. None of the patients required fixation of fracture. At 1 year of follow-up, (12 ± 2.07 months, range 9–16 months) all patients demonstrated almost full range of elbow and forearm motion. Final radiographs revealed complete union without any evidence of avascular necrosis.ConclusionThis technique offers an option of close reduction for the most severely displaced radial neck fractures, which were otherwise being treated by surgical intervention.Electronic Supplementary MaterialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s43465-020-00168-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Changes in the management of pediatric medial humeral epicondyle fractures with and without associated elbow dislocation

Purpose The optimal management of medial humeral epicondyle fractures continues to be debated since decades. This single center study analyzes changes and optimizations of treatment over an observation period of 16 years and reports the results.Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of all patients treated with a medial humeral epicondyle fracture between 2005 and 2020 at our institution.Results Ninety-six patients (mean 9.3 years, range 1 - 15) were included in the study. In 25 cases (26 %), the fracture was associated with an elbow dislocation. Most patients received surgical treatment (83.3 %), whereas 17.7 % were treated nonoperatively. Surgical treatment consisted of open reduction and fixation with compression screw (n = 44 steel, n = 2 absorbable), K-wire (n = 30), a combination of screw/K-wire (n = 2), or a PDS suture (n = 1). Compression screws have been used significantly more often in the latter half of the study period (p = 0.006). Patients were immobilized in a long arm cast for 29 days (range 11 – 50). Eleven surgically treated patients were early mobilized in an elbow orthosis. After a mean follow up of 7.6 months [2 – 61), Mayo elbow performance index (MEPI) outcome was excellent in all 96 patients. Loss of elbow movement (LOM) was found to be mild in 30 and moderate in 15 patients. LOM was found to be associated with surgical treatment (p = 0.001), and with concomitant elbow dislocations (p = 0.29). One pseudarthrosis occurred after conservative treatment. A persistence of ulnar nerve palsy or recurrent joint instability has not been described.Conclusion Most children with medial humeral epicondyle fractures nowadays undergo surgery. Screw osteosynthesis represents the increasingly preferred method in order to prevent joint instability or non-union, and to allow shorter immobilization duration. Overall results after medial epicondyle fractures are good.     

Die Behandlung der Apophysenabrissverletzung des Epicondylus ulnaris im Kindesalter

OBJECTIVE: Surgical reduction and retention of apophyseal avulsion injuries at the medial epicondyle to prevent joint instability, lasting malalignment, or pseudarthrosis. INDICATIONS: Absolute: intraarticular apophyseal dislocation of the medial epicondyle, complete lesion of the ulnar nerve. Relative: dislocation of the apophysis (> 4 mm) in children > 5 years of age; the need for intervention increases in children as the degree of dislocation, age, and athletic activity increase. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Dislocation of the medial epicondyle (< or = 4 mm) in children < 5 years of age, provided the fragment location is not intraarticular. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Open reduction of the apophysis through a medial approach. Identification of the ulnar nerve. In young children or with small fragments fixation with Kirschner wire. Screw fixation in older children or for larger fragments. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Long upper-arm plaster cast until wound healing is achieved. Subsequently, upper-arm plaster cast for 3 weeks. Removal of Kirschner wires after 4-6 weeks, screw removal after 8-12 weeks. Physiotherapy only if marked reduction of elbow mobility is found 6 weeks after cast removal. RESULTS: From January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2003, 25 children with an average age of 12 years suffering from medial epicondylar avulsion fractures were operated on using open reduction and Kirschner wire fixation. An average of 3 years after the injury 14 of these children underwent follow-up examination using a procedure that took subjective, clinical and radiologic parameters into account. Two children showed a slight reduction in overall strength of the injured extremity when compared with the contralateral extremity. One child had a flexion deficit of 10 degrees, all other children showed movement limitations of < or = 5 degrees compared to the contralateral extremity. In all the cases available to follow-up, there was a slight increase in valgus alignment of the elbow joint compared with the uninjured side (3 degrees on average). All fractures consolidated within 6 weeks.     

Triangular Fixation Technique for Bicolumn Restoration in Treatment of Distal Humerus Intercondylar Fracture

Background

Distal humerus intercondylar fractures are intra-articular and comminuted fractures involving soft tissue injury. As distal humerus is triangle-shaped, parallel plating coupled with articular fixation would be suitable for bicolumn restoration in treatment of distal humerus intercondylar fracture.

Methods

This study included 38 patients (15 males and 23 females) who underwent olecranon osteotomy, open reduction and internal fixation with the triangle-shaped cannulated screw and parallel locking plates (triangular fixation technique). Functional results were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Mayo elbow performance (MEP) scores and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaires. Anteroposterior and lateral elbow radiographs were assessed for reduction, alignment, fracture union, posttraumatic arthrosis, and heterotopic ossification, and computed tomography (CT) scans were used to obtain more accurate measurements of articular discrepancy.

Results

All fractures healed primarily with no loss of reduction. The mean VAS, MEP, and DASH scores of the affected elbow were not significantly different from those of the unaffected elbow (p = 0.140, p = 0.090, and p = 0.262, respectively). The mean degree of flexion was significantly lower in the affected elbow than in the unaffected elbow, but was still considered as functional (p = 0.001, > 100° in 33 of 38 patients). Two cases of articular step-offs (> 2 mm) were seen on follow-up CT scans, but not significantly higher in the affected elbow than in the unaffected elbow (p = 0.657). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that only Association for Osteosynthesis (AO) type C3 fractures correlated with good/excellent functional outcome (p = 0.012). Complications occurred in 12 of the 38 patients, and the overall reoperation rate for complications was 10.5% (4 of 38 patients).

Conclusions

Triangular fixation technique for bicolumn restoration was an effective and reliable method in treatment of distal humerus intercondylar fracture. This technique maintained articular congruency and restored both medial and lateral columns, resulting in good elbow function.     

Medial epicondyle fractures in the pediatric population

Humeral medial epicondyle fractures in the pediatric population account for up to 20% of elbow fractures, 60% of which are associated with elbow dislocation. Isolated injuries can occur from either direct trauma or avulsion. Medial epicondyle fractures also occur in combination with elbow dislocations. Traditional management by cast immobilization increasingly is being replaced with early fixation and mobilization. Relative indications for surgical fixation include ulnar nerve entrapment, gross elbow instability, and fractures in athletic or other patients who require high-demand upper extremity function. Absolute indications for surgical intervention are an incarcerated fragment in the joint or open fractures. Radiographic assessment of these injuries and their true degree of displacement remain controversial.     

成人肱骨远端低位通髁骨折的诊疗进展

肱骨远端低位通髁骨折在成年人中罕见，国内外报道较少，年龄呈双峰分布，多为老年人和年轻人。骨折线由内上髁延伸至外上髁，位置很低，为简单横行骨折，属于关节外、关节囊内骨折。标准肘关节正侧位X线片及CT平扫能够明确诊断。非手术治疗仅限于完全无移位骨折、无法耐受麻醉或晚期老年痴呆的患者。切开复位内固定是一线治疗方法，方式以平行及垂直双钢板为主，也有研究采用平行加垂直的"双柱4板"固定方式以及"十"字交叉双全螺纹螺钉固定。另外，有些特制后外侧柱钢板有外侧支撑作用，可置入横行螺钉。而全肘关节置换仅作为内固定失效后的补救措施。目前针对肱骨远端低位通髁骨折多为回顾性研究，证据等级较低。因此，亟需进行前瞻性及随机对照研究，针对不同内固定方式或全肘关节置换治疗低位通髁骨折的生物力学属性及临床疗效进行更进一步的研究。     

A cohort study of one-year functional and radiographic outcomes following intra-articular distal radius fractures

Background

The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of a series of patients followed prospectively after intra-articular distal radius fractures.

Methods

One hundred forty-eight patients with intra-articular fractures (mean age, 47 years; age range, 44–54 years; gender distribution, 60 males and 88 females) were treated with cast only, arthroscopy/closed reduction plus pins, arthroscopy/closed reduction with external fixation, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone, and ORIF with external fixation according to surgeon preference and fracture characteristics. The 1-year outcomes across the groups were measured radiographically (n = 148) and functionally (n = 113; 1-year Wrist Outcome Measure score, Grip Strength, SF-36, and PRWE scores).

Results

Radiographically, the groups had statistically significant differences in radial inclination, volar tilt, intra-articular step-off, and radial shortening in the pre-treatment X-rays. However, following treatment, treatment groups demonstrated no difference statistically in their follow-up radiographic measures. One-year PRWE scores were found to be statistically different across groups. Across groups, the ORIF-alone treatment group had the highest PRWE score reflecting greatest amount of pain and disability. One-year wrist outcome measure scores and grip strength scores were also found to be significantly different across treatment groups. The general health status as measured by the SF-36 was not found to be different across treatment groups.

Conclusions

These findings are consistent with treatment by indication; suboptimal ORIF outcomes may reflect older practice patterns with dorsal plating. A randomized control trial that compares treatments controlling for fracture severity and studies that develop formal clinical prediction rules for treatment assignment are needed.     

Risk factors for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: an eighteen year follow-up study

Purpose

Long-term studies evaluating risk factors for development of ankle osteoarthritis (OA) following malleolar fractures are sparse.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients treated by open reduction and internal fixation for malleolar fracture between January 1988 and December 1997. Perioperative information was obtained retrospectively. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically 12–22 years postoperatively. Radiographic ankle OA was determined on standardised radiographs using the Kellgren and Lawrence scale (grade 3–4 = advanced OA). Uni- and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for OA.

Results

During the inclusion period, 373 fractures (372 patients; 9% Weber A, 58% Weber B, 33% Weber C) were operated upon. The mean age at operation was 42.9 years. There were 102 patients seen at follow-up (mean follow-up 17.9 years). Those not available did not differ in demographics and fracture type from those seen. Advanced radiographic OA was present in 37 patients (36.3%). Significant risk factors were: Weber C fracture, associated medial malleolar fracture, fracture-dislocation, increasing body mass index, age 30 years or more and length of time since surgery.

Conclusions

Advanced radiographic OA was common 12–22 years after malleolar fracture. The probability of developing post-traumatic OA among patients having three or more risk factors was 60–70%.     

Intramedullary nailing versus proximal plating in the management of closed extra-articular proximal tibial fracture: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundExtra-articular proximal tibial fractures account for 5–11 % of all tibial shaft fractures. In recent years, closed reduction and minimally invasive plating and multidirectional locked intramedullary nailing have both become widely used treatment modalities for proximal and distal tibial metaphyseal fractures. This study was performed to compare plating and nailing options in proximal tibia extra-articular fractures.ResultsPostoperative hospital stay (p = 0.035), time to full weight-bearing, and union time (p = 0.004) were significantly less in the IMN group than in the PTP group, but there was no clear advantage of either technique in terms of operative time (p = 0.082), infection rate (p = 0.738), range of motion of the knee (p = 0.462), or degrees of malunion and nonunion.ConclusionBoth implants have shown promising results in extra-articular proximal tibial fractures, and provide rigid fixation that prevents secondary fracture collapse.

Level of evidence

Level 2, randomized controlled trial.     

Open reduction and internal fixation of the posterior malleolus fragment via the posterolateral approach is radiologically superior to ‘A to P’ screw fixation

PurposeFunctional outcome in trimalleolar fractures is largely correlated to the reduction of the posterior fragment. Until recently, fixation was mainly performed for large fragments, by percutaneous anterior to posterior (‘A to P’) screw placement after closed reduction. Nowadays, ORIF via a posterolateral approach seems to gain in popularity. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative photographs of operated trimalleolar fractures after either fracture treatment method, for fracture diastasis and step-off.Material and methodsAll consecutive patients with trimalleolar fractures, including posterior fragments of >5% of the articular surface and operated between 2007–2013 were analysed on size of posterior fragment, post-operative gap and step-off by three observers. The patients were divided into three groups; A to P screw fixation, ORIF via the posterolateral approach and no posterior fragment fixation at all.Results180 patients with trimalleolar ankle fractures were included for analyses. Twenty five posterior fragments were fixated percutaneously from anterior to posterior (group 1) and 51 underwent open reduction and internal fixation through a posterolateral approach (group 2). 104 patients underwent no posterior malleolus fixation (group 3). The average size of posterior fragment was 34% in group 1, 27% in group 2 and 16% in group 3. A postoperative step-off >1 mm was found in 40% (group 1), 9% (group 2) or 34% respectively (group 3).ConclusionsFixation of the posterior malleolus through an open posterolateral approach leads to better radiological results as compared to percutaneous ‘A to P’ screw fixation or no fixation at all.     

Paediatric Ankle Fractures: Guidelines to Management

IntroductionPaediatric ankle fractures represents about 5% of all paediatric fractures. It is the most common physis to be injured in the lower limb accounting to approximately 15–20% of all physeal injuries. This article reviews the literature on this common injury which still has many controversial areas and gives guidelines to management based on the existing evidence along with clinical experience gained from a Level I trauma center.ClassificationThe original Salter–Harris Classification with the additional types is a good system to guide on the management. The transitional fractures form a separate group with technically two broad types—biplane and triplane injuries. Though there are many sub-types in this group with some popular eponymous fractures, the treatment principles remain the same.ManagementA very low threshold for CT scan is recommended when there is a clinical suspicion of fracture with a negative radiograph or an intra-articular fracture in the radiograph especially in the adolescent age group. CT scan helps in accurate quantification of the intra-articular displacement and also helps to comprehend the fracture geometry better. All the intra-articular fractures with displacement > 2 mm need perfect anatomical reduction and stabilization. Assisted closed reduction and percutaneous fixation along with arthrogram to confirm articular congruity is acceptable as long as the reduction is perfect. Irrespective of the method of treatment, in children with more than 2 years of growth remaining it is important to counsel regarding the high incidence of pre-mature physeal closure and the need for regular follow-up.