Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs

Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) are produced by cochlear irregularities reflecting energy from the peak region of the traveling wave (TW). Activation of medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents reduces cochlear amplification and otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). In other OAEs, MOC activation can produce enhancements. The extent of MOC enhancements of SFOAEs has not been previously studied. In anesthetized guinea pigs, we electrically stimulated MOC fibers and recorded their effects on SFOAEs. MOC stimulation mostly inhibited SFOAEs but sometimes enhanced them. Some enhancements were not near response dips and therefore cannot be explained by a reduction of wavelet cancelations. MOC stimulation always inhibited auditory-nerve compound action potentials showing that cochlear-amplifier gain was not increased. We propose that some SFOAE enhancements arise because shocks excite only a small number of MOC fibers that inhibit a few scattered outer hair cells thereby changing (perhaps increasing) cochlear irregularities and SFOAE amplitudes. Contralateral sound activation is expected to excite approximately one third of MOC efferents and may also change cochlear irregularities. Some papers suggest that large SFOAE components originate far basal of the TW peak, basal of the region that receives cochlear amplification. Using a time-frequency analysis, we separated SFOAEs into components with different latencies. At all SFOAE latencies, most SFOAE components were inhibited by MOC stimulation, but some were enhanced. The MOC inhibition of short-latency SFOAE components is consistent with these components being produced in the cochlear-amplified region near the TW peak.     

Estimating Cochlear Frequency Selectivity with Stimulus-frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Chinchillas

It has been suggested that the tuning of the cochlear filters can be derived from measures of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). Two approaches have been proposed to estimate cochlear frequency selectivity using OAEs evoked with a single tone (stimulus-frequency (SF)) OAEs: based on SFOAE group delays (SF-GDs) and on SFOAE suppression tuning curves (SF-STCs). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether either SF-GDs or SF-STCs obtained with low probe levels (30 dB SPL) correlate with more direct measures of cochlear tuning (compound action potential suppression tuning curves (CAP-STCs)) in chinchillas. The SFOAE-based estimates of tuning covaried with CAP-STCs tuning for >3 kHz probe frequencies, indicating that these measures are related to cochlear frequency selectivity. However, the relationship may be too weak to predict tuning with either SFOAE method in an individual. The SF-GD prediction of tuning was sharper than CAP-STC tuning. On the other hand, SF-STCs were consistently broader than CAP-STCs implying that SFOAEs may have less restricted region of generation in the cochlea than CAPs. Inclusion of <3 kHz data in a statistical model resulted in no significant or borderline significant covariation among the three methods: neither SFOAE test appears to reliably estimate an individual’s CAP-STC tuning at low-frequencies. At the group level, SF-GDs and CAP-STCs showed similar tuning at low frequencies, while SF-STCs were over five times broader than the CAP-STCs indicating that low-frequency SFOAE may originate over a very broad region of the cochlea extending ≥5 mm basal to the tonotopic place of the probe.     

Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect

Auditory enhancement refers to the perceptual phenomenon that a target sound is heard out more readily from a background sound if the background is presented alone first. Here we used stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) to test the hypothesis that activation of the medial olivocochlear efferent system contributes to auditory enhancement effects. The SFOAEs were used as a tool to measure changes in cochlear responses to a target component and the neighboring components of a multitone background between conditions producing enhancement and conditions producing no enhancement. In the “enhancement” condition, the target and multitone background were preceded by a precursor stimulus with a spectral notch around the signal frequency; in the control (no-enhancement) condition, the target and multitone background were presented without the precursor. In an experiment using a wideband multitone stimulus known to produce significant psychophysical enhancement effects, SFOAEs showed no changes consistent with enhancement, but some aspects of the results indicated possible contamination of the SFOAE magnitudes by the activation of the middle-ear-muscle reflex. The same SFOAE measurements performed using narrower-band stimuli at lower sound levels also showed no SFOAE changes consistent with either absolute or relative enhancement despite robust psychophysical enhancement effects observed in the same listeners with the same stimuli. The results suggest that cochlear efferent control does not play a significant role in auditory enhancement effects.     

A comparison of OAEs arising from different generation mechanisms in guinea pig

Otoacoustic emissions provide unambiguous evidence that the cochlea supports energy propagation both towards, and away from, the stapes. The standard wave model for energy transport and cochlear mechanical amplification provides for compressional and inertial waves to transport this energy, the compressional wave through the fluids and the inertial wave along the basilar membrane via fluid coupling. It is generally accepted that energy propagation away from the stapes is dominated by a traveling wave mechanism along the basilar membrane. The mechanism by which energy is predominantly transported back to the stapes remains controversial. Here, we compared signal onset delay measurements and rise/steady-state/fall times for SFOAEs and 2f1-f2 OAEs (f2/f1=1.2) obtained using a pulsed-tone paradigm in guinea pig. Comparison of 2f1-f2 OAE signal onset delay for the OAE arising from the f2 region with SFOAE signal onset delay (matched to the f2 stimulus frequency) based on signal onset occurring at 10% of the peak signal amplitude was suggestive of a bi-directional traveling wave mechanism. However, significant variability in signal onset delay and signal rise, steady-state duration, and fall times for both the 2f1-f2 OAE and SFOAE was found, qualifying this interpretation. Such variability requires explanation, awaiting further studies.     

Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) appear to be well suited for assessing frequency selectivity because, at least on theoretical grounds, they originate over a restricted region of the cochlea near the characteristic place of the evoking tone. In support of this view, we previously found good agreement between SFOAE suppression tuning curves (SF-STCs) and a control measure of frequency selectivity (compound action potential suppression tuning curves (CAP-STC)) for frequencies above 3 kHz in chinchillas. For lower frequencies, however, SF-STCs and were over five times broader than the CAP-STCs and demonstrated more high-pass rather than narrow band-pass filter characteristics. Here, we test the hypothesis that the broad tuning of low-frequency SF-STCs is because emissions originate over a broad region of the cochlea extending basal to the characteristic place of the evoking tone. We removed contributions of the hypothesized basally located SFOAE sources by either pre-suppressing them with a high-frequency interference tone (IT; 4.2, 6.2, or 9.2 kHz at 75 dB sound pressure level (SPL)) or by inducing acoustic trauma at high frequencies (exposures to 8, 5, and lastly 3-kHz tones at 110–115 dB SPL). The 1-kHz SF-STCs and CAP-STCs were measured for baseline, IT present and following the acoustic trauma conditions in anesthetized chinchillas. The IT and acoustic trauma affected SF-STCs in an almost indistinguishable way. The SF-STCs changed progressively from a broad high-pass to narrow band-pass shape as the frequency of the IT was lowered and for subsequent exposures to lower-frequency tones. Both results were in agreement with the “basal sources” hypothesis. In contrast, CAP-STCs were not changed by either manipulation, indicating that neither the IT nor acoustic trauma affected the 1-kHz characteristic place. Thus, unlike CAPs, SFOAEs cannot be considered as a place-specific measure of cochlear function at low frequencies, at least in chinchillas.     

Effects of Low-Frequency Biasing on Otoacoustic and Neural Measures Suggest that Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Originate Near the Peak Region of the Traveling Wave

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) have been used to study a variety of topics in cochlear mechanics, although a current topic of debate is where in the cochlea these emissions are generated. One hypothesis is that SFOAE generation is predominately near the peak region of the traveling wave. An opposing hypothesis is that SFOAE generation near the peak region is deemphasized compared to generation in the tail region of the traveling wave. A comparison was made between the effect of low-frequency biasing on both SFOAEs and a physiologic measure that arises from the peak region of the traveling wave—the compound action potential (CAP). SFOAE biasing was measured as the amplitude of spectral sidebands from varying bias tone levels. CAP biasing was measured as the suppression of CAP amplitude from varying bias tone levels. Measures of biasing effects were made throughout the cochlea. Results from cats show that the level of bias tone needed for maximum SFOAE sidebands and for 50% CAP reduction increased as probe frequency increased. Results from guinea pigs show an irregular bias effect as a function of probe frequency. In both species, there was a strong and positive relationship between the bias level needed for maximum SFOAE sidebands and for 50% CAP suppression. This relationship is consistent with the hypothesis that the majority of SFOAE is generated near the peak region of the traveling wave.     

MEASUREMENT OF AMPLITUDE AND DELAY OF STIMULUS FREQUENCY OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS

Although stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) have been used as a non-invasive measure of cochlear mechanics, clinical and experimental application of SFOAEs has been limited by difficulties in accurately deriving quantitative information from sound pressure measured in the ear canal. In this study, a novel signal processing method for multicomponent analysis (MCA) was used to measure the amplitude and delay of the SFOAE. This report shows the delay-frequency distribution of the SFOAE measured from the human ear. A low level acoustical suppressor near the probe tone significantly suppressed the SFOAE, strongly indicating that the SFOAE was generated at characteristic frequency locations. Information derived from this method may reveal more details of cochlear mechanics in the human ear.     

Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans

The characteristics of human otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) have not been thoroughly examined above the standard audiometric frequency range (>8 kHz). This is despite the fact that deterioration of cochlear function often starts at the basal, high-frequency end of the cochlea before progressing apically. Here, stimulus-frequency OAEs (SFOAEs) were obtained from 0.5 to 20 kHz in 23 young, audiometrically normal female adults and three individuals with abnormal audiograms, using a low-to-moderate probe level of 36 dB forward pressure level (FPL). In audiometrically normal ears, SFOAEs were measurable at frequencies approaching the start of the steeply sloping high-frequency portion of the audiogram (～12–15 kHz), though their amplitudes often declined substantially above ～7 kHz, rarely exceeding 0 dB SPL above 8 kHz. This amplitude decline was typically abrupt and occurred at a frequency that was variable across subjects and not strongly related to the audiogram. In contrast, certain ears with elevated mid-frequency thresholds but regions of normal high-frequency sensitivity could possess surprisingly large SFOAEs (>10 dB SPL) above 7 kHz. When also measured, distortion-product OAEs (DPOAEs) usually remained stronger at higher stimulus frequencies and mirrored the audiogram more closely than SFOAEs. However, the high-frequency extent of SFOAE and DPOAE responses was similar when compared as a function of the response frequency, suggesting that middle ear transmission may be a common limiting factor at high frequencies. Nevertheless, cochlear factors are more likely responsible for complexities observed in high-frequency SFOAE spectra, such as abrupt amplitude changes and narrowly defined response peaks above 10 kHz, as well as the large responses in abnormal ears. These factors may include altered cochlear reflectivity due to subtle damage or the reduced spatial extent of the SFOAE generation region at the cochlear base. The use of higher probe levels is necessary to further evaluate the characteristics and potential utility of high-frequency SFOAE measurements.     

Otoacoustic Estimation of Cochlear Tuning: Validation in the Chinchilla

We analyze published auditory-nerve and otoacoustic measurements in chinchilla to test a network of hypothesized relationships between cochlear tuning, cochlear traveling-wave delay, and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs). We find that the physiological data generally corroborate the network of relationships, including predictions from filter theory and the coherent-reflection model of OAE generation, at locations throughout the cochlea. The results support the use of otoacoustic emissions as noninvasive probes of cochlear tuning. Developing this application, we find that tuning ratios—defined as the ratio of tuning sharpness to SFOAE phase-gradient delay in periods—have a nearly species-invariant form in cat, guinea pig, and chinchilla. Analysis of the tuning ratios identifies a species-dependent parameter that locates a transition between “apical-like” and “basal-like” behavior involving multiple aspects of cochlear physiology. Approximate invariance of the tuning ratio allows determination of cochlear tuning from SFOAE delays. We quantify the procedure and show that otoacoustic estimates of chinchilla cochlear tuning match direct measures obtained from the auditory nerve. By assuming that invariance of the tuning ratio extends to humans, we derive new otoacoustic estimates of human cochlear tuning that remain mutually consistent with independent behavioral measurements obtained using different rationales, methodologies, and analysis procedures. The results confirm that at any given characteristic frequency (CF) human cochlear tuning appears sharper than that in the other animals studied, but varies similarly with CF. We show, however, that the exceptionality of human tuning can be exaggerated by the ways in which species are conventionally compared, which take no account of evident differences between the base and apex of the cochlea. Finally, our estimates of human tuning suggest that the spatial spread of excitation of a pure tone along the human basilar membrane is comparable to that in other common laboratory animals.     

Spectral Ripples in Round-Window Cochlear Microphonics: Evidence for Multiple Generation Mechanisms

The cochlear microphonic (CM) results from the vector sum of outer hair cell transduction currents excited by a stimulus. The classical theory of CM generation—that the response measured at the round window is dominated by cellular sources located within the tail region of the basilar membrane (BM) excitation pattern—predicts that CM amplitude and phase vary little with stimulus frequency. Contrary to expectations, CM amplitude and phase-gradient delay measured in response to low-level tones in chinchillas demonstrate a striking, quasiperiodic pattern of spectral ripples, even at frequencies >?5 kHz, where interference with neurophonic potentials is unlikely. The spectral ripples were reduced in the presence of a moderate-level saturating tone at a nearby frequency. When converted to the time domain, only the delayed CM energy was diminished in the presence of the saturator. We hypothesize that the ripples represent an interference pattern produced by CM components with different phase gradients: an early-latency component originating within the tail region of the BM excitation and two delayed components that depend on active cochlear processing near the peak region of the traveling wave. Using time windowing, we show that the early, middle, and late components have delays corresponding to estimated middle-ear transmission, cochlear forward delays, and cochlear round-trip delays, respectively. By extending the classical model of CM generation to include mechanical and electrical irregularities, we propose that middle components are generated through a mechanism of “coherent summation” analogous to the production of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), while the late components arise through a process of internal cochlear reflection related to the generation of stimulus-frequency OAEs. Although early-latency components from the passive tail region typically dominate the round-window CM, at low stimulus levels, substantial contributions from components shaped by active cochlear processing provide a new avenue for improving CM measurements as assays of cochlear health.     

Audiometric predictions using stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and middle ear measurements

OBJECTIVE: The goals of the study are to determine how well stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) identify hearing loss, classify hearing loss as mild or moderate-severe, and correlate with pure-tone thresholds in a population of adults with normal middle ear function. Other goals are to determine if middle ear function as assessed by wideband acoustic transfer function (ATF) measurements in the ear canal account for the variability in normal thresholds, and if the inclusion of ATFs improves the ability of SFOAEs to identify hearing loss and predict pure-tone thresholds. DESIGN: The total suppressed SFOAE signal and its corresponding noise were recorded in 85 ears (22 normal ears and 63 ears with sensorineural hearing loss) at octave frequencies from 0.5 to 8 kHz, using a nonlinear residual method. SFOAEs were recorded a second time in three impaired ears to assess repeatability. Ambient-pressure ATFs were obtained in all but one of these 85 ears and were also obtained from an additional 31 normal-hearing subjects in whom SFOAE data were not obtained. Pure-tone air and bone conduction thresholds and 226-Hz tympanograms were obtained on all subjects. Normal tympanometry and the absence of air-bone gaps were used to screen subjects for normal middle ear function. Clinical decision theory was used to assess the performance of SFOAE and ATF predictors in classifying ears as normal or impaired, and linear regression analysis was used to test the ability of SFOAE and ATF variables to predict the air conduction audiogram. RESULTS: The ability of SFOAEs to classify ears as normal or hearing impaired was significant at all test frequencies. The ability of SFOAEs to classify impaired ears as either mild or moderate-severe was significant at test frequencies from 0.5 to 4 kHz. SFOAEs were present in cases of severe hearing loss. SFOAEs were also significantly correlated with air conduction thresholds from 0.5 to 8 kHz. The best performance occurred with the use of the SFOAE signal-to-noise ratio as the predictor, and the overall best performance was at 2 kHz. The SFOAE signal-to-noise measures were repeatable to within 3.5 dB in impaired ears. The ATF measures explained up to 25% of the variance in the normal audiogram; however, ATF measures did not improve SFOAEs predictors of hearing loss except at 4 kHz. CONCLUSIONS: In common with other OAE types, SFOAEs are capable of identifying the presence of hearing loss. In particular, SFOAEs performed better than distortion-product and click-evoked OAEs in predicting auditory status at 0.5 kHz; SFOAE performance was similar to that of other OAE types at higher frequencies except for a slight performance reduction at 4 kHz. Because SFOAEs were detected in ears with mild to severe cases of hearing loss, they may also provide an estimate of the classification of hearing loss. Although SFOAEs were significantly correlated with hearing threshold, they do not appear to have clinical utility in predicting a specific behavioral threshold. Information on middle ear status as assessed by ATF measures offered minimal improvement in SFOAE predictions of auditory status in a population of normal and impaired ears with normal middle ear function. However, ATF variables did explain a significant fraction of the variability in the audiograms of normal ears, suggesting that audiometric thresholds in normal ears are partially constrained by middle ear function as assessed by ATF tests.     

Localization of the Reflection Sources of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions

The generation of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE) residuals in humans is analyzed both theoretically and experimentally to investigate the relation between the frequency difference between the probe and the suppressor tone and the localization of the residual source. Experimental measurements of the SFOAE residual were performed using suppressors of increasing frequency to separate the otoacoustic response from the probe stimulus. From the response to the probe alone, the SFOAE response was also estimated, using spectral smoothing, and compared with the residuals obtained for different frequency suppressors. A nonlinear delayed-stiffness active cochlear model was used to compute the spatial distribution of the residual sources according to a recent model of the local reflectivity from roughness, as a function of the suppressor frequency. The simulations clarified the role of high-frequency suppressors, showing that in humans, with increasing suppressor frequency, the generation region of the residual is only slightly basally shifted with respect to the case of a near-frequency suppressor, near the basal edge of the peak of the resonant basilar membrane response. As a consequence, the hierarchy among different-delay components correspondingly changes, gradually favoring short-delay components, with increasing suppressor frequency. Good agreement between the experimental and theoretical dependence of the level of otoacoustic components of different delay on the frequency shift between probe and suppressor confirms the validity of this interpretation.     

The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig

Human stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) evoked by low-level stimuli have previously been shown to have properties consistent with such emissions arising from a linear place-fixed reflection mechanism with SFOAE microstructure thought to be due to a variation in the effective reflectance with position along the cochlea [Zweig and Shera, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98 (1995) 2018-2047]. Here we report SFOAEs in the guinea pig obtained using a nonlinear extraction paradigm from the ear-canal recording that show amplitude and phase microstructure akin to that seen in human SFOAEs. Inverse Fourier analysis of the SFOAE spectrum indicates that SFOAEs in the guinea pig are a stimulus level-dependent mix of OAEs arising from linear-reflection and nonlinear-distortion mechanisms. Although the SFOAEs are dominated by OAE generated by a linear-reflection mechanism at low and moderate stimulus levels, nonlinear distortion can dominate some part of, or all of, the emission spectrum at high levels. Amplitude and phase microstructure in the guinea pig SFOAE is evidently a construct of (i). the complex addition of nonlinear-distortion and linear-reflection components; (ii). variation in the effective reflectance with position along the cochlea; and perhaps (iii). the complex addition of multiple intra-cochlear reflections.     

Interrelationships between spontaneous and low-level stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in humans

It has been proposed that OAEs be classified not on the basis of the stimuli used to evoke them, but on the mechanisms that produce them (Shera and Guinan, 1999). One branch of this taxonomy focuses on a coherent reflection model and explicitly describes interrelationships between spontaneous emissions (SOAEs) and stimulus-frequency emissions (SFOAEs). The present study empirically examines SOAEs and SFOAEs from individual ears within the context of model predictions, using a low stimulus level (20 dB SPL) to evoke SFOAEs. Emissions were recorded from ears of normal-hearing young adults, both with and without prominent SOAE activity. When spontaneous activity was observed, SFOAEs demonstrated a localized increase about the SOAE peaks. The converse was not necessarily true though, i.e., robust SFOAEs could be measured where no SOAE peaks were observed. There was no significant difference in SFOAE phase-gradient delays between those with and without observable SOAE activity. However, delays were larger for a 20 dB SPL stimulus level than those previously reported for 40 dB SPL. The total amount of SFOAE phase accumulation occurring between adjacent SOAE peaks tended to cluster about an integral number of cycles. Overall, the present data appear congruous with predictions stemming from the coherent reflection model and support the notion that such comparisons ideally are made with emissions evoked using relatively lower stimulus levels.     

Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging

Previous research on distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) components has hinted at possible differences in the effect of aging on the two basic types of OAEs: those generated by a reflection mechanism in the cochlea and those created by nonlinear distortion (Abdala and Dhar in J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 13:403–421, 2012). This initial work led to the hypothesis that micromechanical irregularity (“roughness”) increases in the aging cochlea, perhaps as the result of natural tissue degradation. Increased roughness would boost the backscattering of traveling waves (i.e., reflection emissions) while minimally impacting DPOAEs. To study the relational effect of aging on both types of emissions and address our hypothesis of its origin, we measured reflection- and distortion-type OAEs in 77 human subjects aged 18–76 years. The stimulus-frequency OAE (SFOAE), a reflection emission, and the distortion component of the DPOAE, a nonlinear distortion emission, were recorded at multiple stimulus levels across a four-octave range in all ears. Although the levels of both OAE types decreased with age, the rate of decline in OAE level was consistently greater for DPOAEs than for SFOAEs; that is, SFOAEs are relatively preserved with advancing age. Multiple regression analyses and other controls indicate that aging per se, and not hearing loss, drives this effect. Furthermore, SFOAE generation was simulated using computational modeling to explore the origin of this result. Increasing the amount of mechanical irregularity with age produced an enhancement of SFOAE levels, providing support for the hypothesis that increased intra-cochlear roughness during aging may preserve SFOAE levels. The characteristic aging effect—relatively preserved reflection-emission levels combined with more markedly reduced distortion-emission levels—indicates that SFOAE magnitudes in elderly individuals depend on more than simply the gain of the cochlear amplifier. This relative pattern of OAE decline with age may provide a diagnostic marker for aging-related changes in the cochlea.     

Cochlear delays measured with amplitude-modulated tone-burst-evoked OAEs

Delay times in the mammalian cochlea, whether from measurement of basilar membrane (BM) vibration or otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) have, to date, been largely based on phase-gradient estimates from steady-state responses. Here we report cochlear delays measured directly in the time domain from OAEs evoked by amplitude-modulated tone-burst (AMTB) stimuli. Measurement using OAEs provides a non-invasive estimate of cochlear delay but is confounded by the complexity of generation of such OAEs. At low to moderate stimulus levels, and provided that the stimulus frequency range does not include a region of the cochlea where there is a large change in effective reflectance, AMTB stimuli evoke an OAE with an envelope shape that is similar to the stimulus and allow a direct calculation of cochlear group delay. Such delays are commensurate with BM estimates of delay, estimates of cochlear delay inferred from neural recordings, and previous OAE measures of delay in the guinea pig. However, a nonlinear distortion mechanism, variation in effective reflectance, and intermodulation distortion products generated by the nonlinear interaction in the cochlea of the carrier and sidebands of the AMTB stimulus, may all contribute to OAEs arising with envelope shapes that are not a scaled representation of the stimulus, confounding the estimation of cochlear group delay.     

Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners

Objective: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) can provide useful measures of tuning of auditory filters. We previously established that stimulus-frequency (SF) OAE suppression tuning curves (STCs) reflect major features of behavioral tuning (psychophysical tuning curves, PTCs) in normally-hearing listeners. Here, we aim to evaluate whether SFOAE STCs reflect changes in PTC tuning in cases of abnormal hearing. Design: PTCs and SFOAE STCs were obtained at 1 kHz and/or 4 kHz probe frequencies. For exploratory purposes, we collected SFOAEs measured across a wide frequency range and contrasted them to commonly measured distortion product (DP) OAEs. Study sample: Thirteen listeners with varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Results: Except for a few listeners with the most hearing loss, the listeners had normal/nearly normal PTCs. However, attempts to record SFOAE STCs in hearing-impaired listeners were challenging and sometimes unsuccessful due to the high level of noise at the SFOAE frequency, which is not a factor for DPOAEs. In cases of successful measurements of SFOAE STCs there was a large variability in agreement between SFOAE STC and PTC tuning. Conclusions: These results indicate that SFOAE STCs cannot substitute for PTCs in cases of abnormal hearing, at least with the paradigm adopted in this study.     

Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Suppression Tuning in Humans: Comparison to Behavioral Tuning

As shown by the work of Kemp and Chum in 1980, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves (SFOAE STCs) have potential to objectively estimate behaviorally measured tuning curves. To date, this potential has not been tested. This study aims to do so by comparing SFOAE STCs and behavioral measures of tuning (simultaneous masking psychophysical tuning curves, PTCs) in 10 normal-hearing listeners for frequency ranges centered around 1,000 and 4,000 Hz at low probe levels. Additionally, SFOAE STCs were collected for varying conditions (probe level and suppression criterion) to identify the optimal parameters for comparison with behavioral data and to evaluate how these conditions affect the features of SFOAE STCs. SFOAE STCs qualitatively resembled PTCs: they demonstrated band-pass characteristics and asymmetric shapes with steeper high-frequency sides than low, but unlike PTCs they were consistently tuned to frequencies just above the probe frequency. When averaged across subjects the shapes of SFOAE STCs and PTCs showed agreement for most recording conditions, suggesting that PTCs are predominantly shaped by the frequency-selective filtering and suppressive effects of the cochlea. Individual SFOAE STCs often demonstrated irregular shapes (e.g., “double-tips”), particularly for the 1,000-Hz probe, which were not observed for the same subject’s PTC. These results show the limited utility of SFOAE STCs to assess tuning in an individual. The irregularly shaped SFOAE STCs may be attributed to contributions from SFOAE sources distributed over a region of the basilar membrane extending beyond the probe characteristic place, as suggested by a repeatable pattern of SFOAE residual phase shifts observed in individual data.     

Similarity of Traveling-Wave Delays in the Hearing Organs of Humans and Other Tetrapods

Transduction of sound in mammalian ears is mediated by basilar-membrane waves exhibiting delays that increase systematically with distance from the cochlear base. Most contemporary accounts of such “traveling-wave” delays in humans have ignored postmortem basilar-membrane measurements in favor of indirect in vivo estimates derived from brainstem-evoked responses, compound action potentials, and otoacoustic emissions. Here, we show that those indirect delay estimates are either flawed or inadequately calibrated. In particular, we argue against assertions based on indirect estimates that basilar-membrane delays are much longer in humans than in experimental animals. We also estimate in vivo basilar-membrane delays in humans by correcting postmortem measurements in humans according to the effects of death on basilar-membrane vibrations in other mammalian species. The estimated in vivo basilar-membrane delays in humans are similar to delays in the hearing organs of other tetrapods, including those in which basilar membranes do not sustain traveling waves or that lack basilar membranes altogether.     

Correspondence amongst microstructure patterns observed in otoacoustic emissions and Békésy audiometry.

Similar patterns of microstructure have been reported in normal ears for Békésy threshold recordings and various forms of otoacoustic emissions (OAE). It has been suggested that they have a common origin associated with the amplifying function of the outer hair cell system and wave interactions occurring within cochlear mechanics. Fine-frequency Békésy audiometry was conducted in ten normal ears and its microstructure was compared with that recorded using two OAq techniques: stimulus frequency (SFOAE) and distortion product (DPOAE). All sweeps encompassed the frequency range from 992 to 2000 Hz in 16-Hz steps. The same probe was used for all Békésy and OAE recordings to eliminate transducer effects. SFOAEs were obtained with stimulus intensities of 0, 3, 6 and 9 dB. DPOAEs were obtained for 2F1-F2 with primary levels (L1/L2) of 40/30, 45/35, 50/40 and 55/45 dB. Reliable microstructure was recorded in all ears. Mean values of microstructure peak spacing ranged from 5.6 to 9.3 per cent amongst methods, consistent with published data. Microstructure was similar within each OAE method for different stimulus intensities for each subject. However, comparisons between Békésy and OAEs, or between OAE methods, did not show the strong correspondence that would be expected if there were a simple common origin to the microstructure. There was weak support for the expected correspondence between Békésy and SFOAE, but no support for any correspondence between Békésy and DPOAE. It is concluded that the various forms of microstructure cannot be explained by a simple common origin.