Prognostic factors affecting long-term outcome after stem cell transplantation in Hodgkin's lymphoma autografted after a first relapse.

PURPOSE: To analyse outcome and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) in 357 patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) undergoing an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after a first relapse and reported to the The Grupo Espanol de Linfomas/Trasplante Autologo de Medula Osea (GEL/TAMO) Cooperative Group. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty males and 137 females with a median age of 29 years were autografted in second remission (n=181), first sensitive relapse (n=148) and first resistant relapse (n=28). RESULTS: Five-year actuarial TTF and OS were of 49% +/- 3% and 57% +/- 3%. Advanced stage at diagnosis, complementary radiotherapy before ASCT, a short first complete response (CR) and detectable disease at ASCT adversely influenced TTF. Year of transplant < or =1995, bulky disease at diagnosis, a short first CR, detectable disease at ASCT and > or =1 extranodal areas involved at ASCT were adverse factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: ASCT constitutes a therapeutic option for HL patients after a first relapse. Promising results are observed in patients with low tumour burden at diagnosis, autografted after a long CR and without detectable disease at ASCT. Innovative approaches should be pursued for patients with risk factors at relapse.     

新药诱导后自体干细胞移植巩固治疗对不同危险度骨髓瘤患者的作用探讨*

目的:探讨自体造血干细胞移植（autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation ,ASCT）作为新药诱导后的巩固治疗对不同危险分层骨髓瘤患者的无进展生存时间（progression-freesurvival ,PFS）及总生存时间（over all survival,OS）的影响。方法:回顾性分析2006年8 月至2011年7 月在本科行自体干细胞移植巩固治疗的67例多发性骨髓瘤患者,根据ISS 分期及FISH检测结果为基础的最新IMWG 预后标准分为高危组17例,中危组24例,低危组26例。另选取同时期67例接受化疗作为巩固治疗的骨髓瘤患者进行年龄、危险分层配对,比较移植组与化疗组的PFS 和OS差异。所有患者前期均接受硼替佐米和/或沙利度胺为主的诱导治疗。结果:所有患者诱导治疗后均达到部分缓解（partial remissive disease ,PR）以上疗效,移植组与化疗组vs . 接近完全缓解率（nCR/CR）差异无统计学意义（44.8% vs. 37.3% ,P=0.380）。 巩固治疗后,高、中、低危移植组患者中位nCR/CR率分别由47.1% ,37.5% ,50.0% 增加为62.9% ,62.5% ,61.5% 。高危患者移植巩固后中位PFS（30.5 个月vs. 11.2 月,P<0.001）和OS（85.5 vs. 34个月,P=0.015）均明显延长;中危移植组和化疗组中位PFS 和OS无统计学差异（P>0.05）;低危移植组患者与化疗组相比,中位PFS 延长（34.8 vs. 17.6 个月,P=0.012）,OS差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。 结论:在硼替佐米和/或沙利度胺为基础的新药诱导治疗后,高危骨髓瘤患者更能从自体造血干细胞移植巩固治疗中获益,进而延长生存。      

Primary mediastinal large cell lymphoma (PMBL): frontline treatment with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The GEL-TAMO experience

Given the excellent results obtained with present new induction regimens in PMBL, the role of frontline ASCT is controversial. We present 71 patients with PMBL receiving induction chemotherapy, followed by ASCT as frontline therapy from the GEL-TAMO registry. Most patients presented with high-risk clinical features. At transplant, 49% of patients were in CR, 32% in PR and 18% failed induction therapy; 53% received radiotherapy. After the transplant 75% of patients achieved CR. With a median follow-up of 52.5 months, the OS, PFS and DFS at 4 years from diagnosis were, respectively, 84%, 81% and 81% for the first CR patients and 49%, 42% and 82% for the induction failure (PR and refractory) patients. Disease progression was the main cause of death (79%). By multivariate survival analysis the tumour score, refractory disease at transplant and radiotherapy were independent variables associated with OS and PFS. Our experience, with a prolonged follow-up, shows that patients with PMBL presenting at diagnosis with high-risk features or PR response to induction therapy have an encouraging survival with frontline ASCT. However, patients who received the transplant after failing the induction regimen have a very poor prognosis and should be tested with other innovative approaches. Finally, only a randomized trial could prove the value of ASCT as frontline therapy and also must be considered that addition to Rituximab to induction treatments could make ASCT unnecessary.     

自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效及预后影响因素分析

目的:探讨自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤（MM）的疗效和影响MM患者预后的因素。方法:回顾性分析我院2012年01月至2019年12月37例接受自体造血干细胞移植的MM患者的临床资料,中位随访时间为55（1～91）个月。对37例患者的反应深度、无进展生存时间（PFS）、总生存时间（OS）和影响预后的相关因素进行分析。结果:移植后3月内疗效达到完全缓解率和深度缓解率均优于移植前（P＜0.01,P＜0.05）,移植前后总有效率（ORR）比较无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。患者3年、5年OS率为97.0%、81.4%;3年、5年PFS率为62.7%、51.0%;中位PFS和OS均未获得。单因素分析结果表明移植后3月内疗效获得深度缓解较未获得患者无论是OS 还是PFS均较优 (P均＜0.01);诱导化疗后获得深度缓解可明显延长OS（P＜0.05）;DS分期Ⅰ-Ⅱ期、mSMART3.0危险分层标危患者相比DS分期Ⅲ期、高危患者PFS均有明显优势(P＜0.05)。Cox 多因素回归分析显示,移植后3月内疗效达深度缓解是PFS和OS的独立预后因素,mSMART3.0危险分层也是PFS的独立预后因素。结论:自体造血干细胞移植可以提高 MM 患者的反应深度。移植前后疗效、DS分期和mSMART3.0危险分层均可影响MM患者生存率。移植后3月内疗效达深度缓解是PFS 和OS的独立预后因素,mSMART3.0危险分层也是PFS的独立预后因素。     

新药诱导后自体造血干细胞移植对以荧光原位杂交分层的多发性骨髓瘤患者的价值

 　目的　评价新药诱导后自体造血干细胞移植（ASCT）对荧光原位杂交（FISH）标危及高危多发性骨髓瘤患者生存的影响。方法　回顾性分析74例多发性骨髓瘤患者,均接受以硼替佐米和（或）沙利度胺为主的诱导化疗,按FISH检测结果及诱导后是否接受ASCT分为标危移植组、标危化疗组、高危移植组及高危化疗组4组,通过生存分析分别评价ASCT对标危及高危患者生存的影响。结果　74例患者经新药诱导后总缓解率为91.9 %（68／74）,接近完全缓解（nCR）+ 完全缓解（CR）率为62.2 %（46／74）。FISH标危的患者与高危的患者诱导后缓解率分别为93.2 %（41／44）与86.7 %（26／30）（P＝0.592）,nCR+CR率分别为56.8 %（25／44）与70.0 %（21／30）（P＝0.251）。FISH标危的患者中,接受移植的患者与接受化疗巩固的患者无进展生存（PFS）及总生存（OS）差异均无统计学意义（P值分别为0.642和0.652）,而FISH高危的患者中,接受移植的患者比接受化疗巩固的患者PFS延长19.7个月（P＝0.028）,OS延长12.5个月（P＝0.542）。结论　在以硼替佐米和（或）沙利度胺为主的方案诱导后,ASCT对 FISH标危多发性骨髓瘤患者的PFS和OS均没有影响,但可使FISH高危患者的PFS延长。     

30例自体外周造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效及预后因素评价

目的:对30例多发性骨髓瘤（multiple myeloma,MM）患者经自体外周造血干细胞移植（autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation ,APBSCT）治疗后的临床疗效进行评估,并分析可能影响预后的因素。方法:30例MM患者有2 例复发行2 次APBSCT,因此共计移植32例次。移植前予常规联合化疗（11例含万珂）,化疗联合G-CSF 动员APBSC ,选择以马法兰为基础的预处理方案,d0 天回输。结果:动员后患者采集的单个核细胞（MNC）中位数为6.41× 108/kg,CD34+细胞4.75× 106/kg。APBSCT后中位中性粒细胞和血小板重建时间分别为9.5 天和11天。APBSCT后CR和VGPR 率分别为37.5% 和34.4% ,中位生存期（overallsurvival ,OS）为67.27个月,中位无进展生存期（progression-freesurvival ,PFS）为29.77个月,其中CR组、PR组中位PFS 分别为29个月、20个月,VGPR 组中位PFS 未达到,CR+VGPR组与PR组PFS 比较P=0.025。万珂组和非万珂组CR率分别为63.6% 和23.8%（P=0.034）,万珂组中位OS及PFS 均未达到,非万珂组中位PFS 为22个月（P=0.045）。 结论:硼替佐米诱导序贯APBSCT可获得更长的无病生存。APBSCT作为MM诱导缓解后的强化治疗,缓解率高,且移植后获得VGPR 以上反应的患者PFS 获益。      

Comparison between autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation as salvage therapy for multiple myeloma relapsing/progressing after autologous stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐SCT) offers a clinical option to young patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapsing/progressing after autologous SCT (ASCT); however, this claim remains debatable. Thus, in this retrospective study, we analyzed 526 patients with MM who underwent SCT for MM relapsing/progressing after the prior ASCT using the registry data of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (2001‐2015) and compared overall survival (OS) between allo‐SCT (n = 192) and autologous stem cell retransplantation groups (ReASCT; n = 334) based on risk factor points. Significant adverse factors for OS in all patients were (1) male sex, (2) less than partial response to SCT, (3) performance status of 2 to 4, and (4) short duration from the prior ASCT. We scored factor 2 as 1 point, factor 3 as 2 points, and factor 4 as 0, 1, or 2 points for more than 30, 9 to 30, or less than 9 months, respectively. We categorized patients into three risk subgroups based on their total points (0, 1‐3, and 4‐5 points), indicating the usefulness of this scoring system for prognosis prediction and treatment selection. Subgroup comparison revealed OS after ReASCT to be higher than that after allo‐SCT in the intermediate‐risk subgroup comprising the largest population (28.2% vs 21.5%, P < .004). We observed no significant advantages of allo‐SCT over ReASCT in the low‐ and high‐risk subgroups. These findings suggest that ReASCT is more advantageous than allo‐SCT in many patients with MM relapsing/progressing after the prior ASCT. However, long‐term survival patients were noted only in the allo‐SCT group, and allo‐SCT could exhibit clinical efficacy, particularly in the low‐risk group. While further examination is warranted, allo‐SCT could be a potential tool for a specific population with MM relapsing/progressing after the prior ASCT.     

自体造血干细胞移植可使中国高危多发性骨髓瘤患者获益更多

目的 评价自体造血干细胞移植（ASCT）对初治多发性骨髓瘤（MM）的疗效.方法 选取诱导治疗后获得部分缓解（PR）及以上疗效的42例初治MM患者进行ASCT,中位随访34.2个月后,观察患者的疗效、无进展生存（PFS）和总生存（OS）.选择同时期的49例诱导治疗后获得PR及以[上疗效的初治MM患者,进入非移植组（non-ASCT）,经巩固维持治疗后观察疗效、PFS和OS,比较两组的差异,分析ASCT在MM中的作用.结果 与non-ASCT组相比,ASCT可明显延长患者的OS（未达到/37.2个月,P=O.000）,而且对PFS也有延长趋势（33.9个月/39.8个月,P=0.133）.ASCT可明显改善DSⅢ期（P=0.009）和ISSⅢ期（P=0.049）患者PFS,但对DSⅠ /Ⅱ期和ISS Ⅰ/Ⅱ期患者的PFS改善不明显.ASCT可明显改善诱导治疗后获得CR患者的PFS（P=0.016）,对非常好的PR （VGPR） /PR患者的PFS改善不明显;不同年龄患者OS均明显改善（≤55岁,P=0.039;＞ 55岁,P=0.000）.ASCT可明显改善不同ISS分期患者的OS（Ⅰ/Ⅱ期,P=0.003;Ⅲ期,P=0.012）,对DSⅢ期患者的OS也有明显改善作用（P=0.000）,但对DSⅠ/Ⅱ期患者OS的作用不明显（P=0.446）.诱导治疗后获得CR和VGPR/PR的患者进行移植后,OS可进一步得到改善（CR,P=0.004; VGPR/PR,P=0.004）.结论 ASCT可明显改善初治MM患者的生存,使高龄和分期预后不良的MM患者获益更多.     

Pretransplant positive positron emission tomography/gallium scans predict poor outcome in patients with recurrent/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the prognostic value of functional imaging (FI) in predicting outcome of patients with recurrent/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) before undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). METHODS: Clinical and imaging data were retrospectively reviewed in 211 consecutive patients treated with ASCT from February 1993 to May 2004. The FI results were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: Responses were assessed by conventional criteria and evaluated by positron emission tomography (PET) (n = 68) and gallium scans (n = 144) before ASCT. A complete response (CR) or unconfirmed CR (CRu) was seen in 51% of patients, a partial response (PR) in 41% of patients, and stable or progressive disease in 7% of patients. FI was positive in only 6 of 110 (5%) of CR/CRu patients, in 48 of 86 (56%) of PR patients, and in all 3 patients with progressive disease. The 3-year PFS was 69% for patients with negative FI versus 23% for patients with positive FI (P < .0001). The 3-year OS rates were 87% and 58%, respectively (P < .0001). The 3-year PFS for patients in PR with negative FI was 51% comparable to patients in CR (76%) versus 27% for patients in PR with positive FI (P < .0001). In a multivariate model, positive FI was found to be independently prognostic of PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Pretransplant FI status predicts outcome in patients with recurrent/refractory HL. Positive FI confers a poor prognosis, independent of other traditional presalvage prognostic factors.     

Autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with active Hodgkin's lymphoma: long-term outcome of 61 patients from a single institution

Sixty-one patients with refractory or relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) underwent high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). All patients had active HL at the time of ASCT: 13 patients had partial remission, 14 refractory disease, 18 sensitive relapse, 4 resistant relapse, and 12 nontreated relapse. Overall transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 16.4% at 1 year. Twenty-eight patients (46%) achieved complete remission (CR). Actuarial 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 51% and 47%, respectively. Patients with positive gallium-67 scintigraphy at 3 - 6 months after transplantation had a worse PFS at 5 years (28%) than those with negative 67Ga scan (80%) (p = 0.016), whereas no statistical differences were observed between patients with residual mass and those in CR according to computed tomography scan. In multivariate analysis, bulky disease at diagnosis, bone marrow stem cells, and stage IV at transplant were the only adverse prognostic factors significantly influencing OS. Bulky disease at diagnosis and stage IV at transplant adversely influenced PFS. Although long-term outcome of patients with active HL at the time of ASCT is poor due to a high TRM and a low CR after transplantation, a subgroup of patients with no adverse prognostic factors at ASCT gain benefit from this treatment.     

Bortezomib,thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND:

This single‐center retrospective study determined the efficacy of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (BTD) as induction for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who were eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

METHODS:

Patients with symptomatic MM who had received BTD induction before stem cell collection at Winship Cancer Institute were included. BTD induction comprised up to 8 3‐week cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11; thalidomide 100 mg daily; and dexamethasone 40 mg on Days 1 through 4 and Days 9 through 12. Stem cell mobilization involved granulocyte‐colony–stimulating factor and/or cyclophosphamide. Response was assessed according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria.

RESULTS:

Review of medical records identified 44 eligible patients (34 patients who were treated in the front‐line setting and 10 patients who were treated for recurrent disease) who received a median of 4 BTD cycles. The overall response rate (ORR) was 91%, which included a greater than or equal to very good partial response (≥VGPR) rate of 57% (including 20% stringent complete responses/complete response [sCR/CR] rate). In front‐line patients, the ORR was 94%, which included a 56% ≥VGPR rate (24% sCR/CR). The median CD34‐positive stem cell collection was 10.67 × 10⁶/kg. The ORR after ASCT in 34 patients who were evaluable for response was 100%, including a 76% ≥VGPR rate (53% sCR/CR). Among all 44 patients, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 27.4 months. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached after a median follow‐up of 25 months, and the 2‐year OS rate was 82%. There were no significant differences in PFS (27.4 months vs 23.5 months) or in 2‐year survival (80% vs 90%) between patients who did and did not undergo ASCT, respectively. Twenty patients (45%) developed neuropathy, including 4 (9%) with grade 3 neuropathy episodes, and 1 patient developed deep vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS:

BTD was highly effective and well tolerated as induction for MM patients who were eligible for ASCT. Long‐term outcomes appeared to be similar with or without ASCT consolidation. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Novel agents-based regimens as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

To investigate the effect of novel agents like bortezomib, lenalidomide and thalidomide as part of induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Medline, Embase, the Cochrane controlled trials register and the Science Citation Index were searched for RCTs of novel agents as part of induction therapy before ASCT. Three RCTs of bortezomib, two RCTs of thalidomide and no RCT of lenalidomide were identified, covering a total of 2,316 subjects. Due to different mechanisms of action, we performed a subgroup analysis by type of agent (thalidomide or bortezomib). The weighted risk ratios of a complete response (CR) were 4.25 [95% CI: 2.44-7.41] (p < 0.001) for bortezomib and 1.66 [95% CI: 1.15-2.38] (p = 0.007) for thalidomide, respectively. The summary hazard ratios for progression-free survival (PFS) were 0.73 [95% CI: 0.59-0.89] (p = 0.002) for bortezomib and 0.68 [95% CI: 0.59-0.79] (p < 0.001) for thalidomide, respectively. The corresponding ratios for overall survival (OS) were 0.87 [95% CI: 0.64-1.18] (p = 0.37) and 0.88 [95% CI: 0.73-1.05] (p = 0.14), respectively. Additionally, there was a statistically significant heterogeneity between subgroups (thalidomide and bortezomib) for CR (p = 0.005) but nonsignificant for PFS (p = 0.64) and OS (p = 0.97). In conclusion, our analysis showed novel agents as induction treatment prior to ASCT improved CR and PFS but not OS.     

抗CD20单克隆抗体联合自体外周血干细胞移植治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤的临床研究

 目的　探讨抗CD20单克隆抗体（利妥昔单抗,商品名：美罗华）联合自体外周血干细胞移植（APBSCT）治疗B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤（NHL）的疗效。方法　21例CD20阳性的NHL患者,经过前期治疗,5例达完全缓解（CR）,难治性病例为16例,包括11例部分缓解（PR）和5例疾病进展（PD）。在自体造血干细胞动员的第1、8天及预处理的-1、＋7天每天应用利妥昔单抗375 mg／m2。结果　移植前疾病达到CR的5例患者,无一例复发;移植前处于PR的11例患者,仅1例在移植后6个月疾病复发,其余均无病生存;移植前处于PD的5例患者,2例无病生存。21例患者中位随访24（1～68）个月,复发、死亡4例（19 %）,其余17例均无病生存,2年无病生存（EFS）和总生存（OS）率均为81.0 %。未观察到利妥昔单抗对采集所得干细胞的质量和数量以及移植后造血恢复有不良影响。结论　APBSCT联合利妥昔单抗做体内净化治疗B细胞NHL疗效与移植前状态有关,作为巩固治疗,能使移植前达CR的患者获得长期生存,提高治愈率;作为强化治疗,可提高缓解率,延长PR患者的EFS及OS。利妥昔单抗的加入不影响造血干细胞采集和移植后造血重建。     

Improved survival of multiple myeloma patients treated with autologous transplantation in the modern era of new medicine

New drugs for multiple myeloma (MM) have dramatically improved patients’ overall survival (OS). Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the mainstay for transplant-eligible MM patients. To investigate whether the post-ASCT prognosis of MM patients has been improved by new drugs, we undertook a retrospective observational analysis using the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program database in Japan. We analyzed 7323 patients (4135 men and 3188 women; median age, 59 years; range 16-77 years) who underwent upfront ASCT between January 2007 and December 2018. We categorized them by when they underwent ASCT according to the drugs’ introduction in Japan: group 1 (2007-2010), group 2 (2011-2016), and group 3 (2017-2018). We compared the groups’ post-ASCT OS. The 2-year OS rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) of groups 1, 2, and 3 were 85.8% (84.1%-87.4%), 89.1% (88.0%-90.1%), and 92.3% (90.0%-94.2%) (P < .0001) and the 5-year OS (95% CI) rates were 64.9% (62.4%-67.3%), 71.6% (69.7%-73.3%), and not applicable, respectively (P < .0001). A multivariate analysis showed that the post-ASCT OS was superior with these factors: age less than 65 years, performance status 0/1, low International Staging System (ISS) stage, receiving SCT for 180 days or less post-diagnosis, better treatment response pre-ASCT, later year of ASCT, and receiving SCT twice. A subgroup analysis showed poor prognoses for the patients with unfavorable karyotype and poor treatment response post-ASCT. The post-ASCT OS has thus improved over time (group 1 < 2 < 3) with the introduction of new drugs for MM. As the prognosis of high-risk-karyotype patients with ISS stage III remains poor, their treatment requires improvement.     

含利妥昔单抗化疗方案治疗套细胞淋巴瘤效果分析

目的探讨含利妥昔单抗化疗方案治疗套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)患者效果及预后影响因素。方法回顾性分析2007年6月至2018年11月苏州大学附属第一医院血液科收治的56例≤65岁MCL患者临床资料,化疗方案中均包括利妥昔单抗,观察临床特征、治疗方案及生物学指标对总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)的影响。结果56例患者中位发病年龄57岁,男性43例,女性13例。24例接受R-CHOP方案化疗;29例接受含阿糖胞苷方案化疗,其中15例接受R-hyper CVAD/R-MA方案化疗,14例接受R-CHOP/R-DAHP交替治疗;3例接受其他方案化疗。19例接受自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT)巩固治疗。56例患者中位OS时间74个月,2年OS率83.8%,3年OS率70.9%,2年PFS率72.0%,3年PFS率49.7%。国际预后指数(IPI)评分和治疗中是否接受ASCT是MCL患者OS和PFS的独立影响因素。含阿糖胞苷治疗组总有效率(ORR)93.1%,优于R-CHOP方案组(83.3%),差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.465,P=0.495);两组间OS及PFS差异均无统计学意义(OS:χ²=0.291,P=0.590;PFS:χ²=0.912,P=0.339)。诱导化疗达缓解的MCL患者中,ASCT巩固治疗可延长中位OS时间(72个月比124个月,χ²=3.973,P=0.040)及中位PFS时间(34个月比90个月,χ²=3.984,P=0.046)。简化MCL国际预后指数(sMIPI)评分中高危组患者中接受ASCT巩固治疗患者OS和PFS优于未接受ASCT治疗者(OS:χ²=5.037,P=0.025;PFS:χ²=6.787,P=0.009),而sMIPI评分低危组患者中,是否接受ASCT组间OS、PFS差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论含阿糖胞苷的化疗方案对改善MCL患者的预后和生存并不理想。对于诱导化疗达缓解及sMIPI评分中高危组的MCL患者,ASCT巩固治疗可改善其预后,可作为年轻患者的一线巩固治疗方案。     

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma having 8q24/MYC rearrangement in Japan

The prognosis of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) having MYC rearrangement (MYC‐R), including double hit lymphoma (DHL), is poor by standard immunochemotherapy. To evaluate the significance of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for DLBCL with MYC‐R, we retrospectively analyzed Japanese SCT registry data. In total, 54 patients with DLBCL with MYC‐R were identified from 4336 registered adult DLBCL patients. Detailed clinical and cytogenetic information was obtained for 48 patients. The median age at diagnosis of the 48 patients was 54.5 (range 21–67) years. Twenty‐six (54%) patients had MYC‐R only (single hit), and 22 (46%) had MYC‐R and BCL2, and/or BCL6 rearrangement (double/triple hit). In 12 patients who received auto‐SCT during the first complete response (CR), both the 2‐year overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) rates were 75.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.8%–91.2%). In 20 patients who received auto‐SCT after relapsed or refractory state, the 2‐year OS and PFS rates were 68.2% (95% CI, 41.9%–84.5%) and 59.6% (95% CI, 35.1%–77.4%), respectively. In 17 patients who received allo‐SCT, only 4 patients underwent SCT in CR. The 2‐year OS and PFS rates were 29.4% (95% CI, 10.7%–51.1%) and 17.6% (95% CI, 4.3%–38.3%), respectively. The rate of non‐relapse mortality at 1 year was 41.2% (95% CI, 17.1%–64.0%) in this group. The outcomes of single hit and double or triple hit were not different. These findings suggest that auto‐SCT may be effective for MYC‐R DLBCL, including DHL patients of chemosensitive relapsed or refractory state. Since most patients received allo‐SCT not in CR, the outcome of allo‐SCT was unsatisfactory due to high non‐relapse mortality and early relapse. To clarify the role of allo‐SCT for MYC‐R DLBCL, further accumulation of patients is necessary.     

Prolonged survival after second autologous transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance for salvage treatment of myeloma patients at first relapse after prior autograft

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as part of the primary therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) is standard practice. In contrast, the role of a second ASCT (ASCT2) and subsequent lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed disease remains unclear. In this study, we analysed 86 consecutive MM patients with a first relapse after prior ASCT receiving either a second ASCT or conventional chemotherapy. After a median follow‐up of 37.7 months since first relapse, 54 (62.8%) patients were still alive and 29 (33.7%) without progression. Sixty‐one (71.0%) patients received ASCT2 and had better progression‐free survival (PFS) (30.2 versus 13.0 mo; P = .0262) and overall survival (OS) rates (129.6 versus 33.5 mo; P = .0003) compared with 25 (29.0%) patients with conventional treatment. Patients relapsing later than 12 months after ASCT1 benefitted from a second ASCT with better PFS2 (P = .0179) and OS2 (P = .0009). Finally, lenalidomide maintenance after ASCT2 was associated with longer PFS (41.0 vs 21.6 mo; P = .0034) and better OS (not yet reached vs 129.6 mo; P = .0434) compared with patients without maintenance. Our data suggest that a second ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance given at first relapse in MM after prior ASCT are associated with better survival rates.     

Rapidity and Quality of Response to Steroid-Based Induction Therapy,Without the Addition of Novel Agents,Does Not Affect Post Transplant Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundThe goal of induction in younger MM patients is to improve performance status and symptoms, enabling autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). It is unclear whether intensification of induction regimens improves post transplant outcomes.Patients and MethodsWe studied 178 MM patients who received conservative steroid-based induction therapy without novel agents before ASCT between 2000 and 2006 and correlated induction parameters (rapidity of response, need for salvage induction therapy, depth of response) with transplant outcomes.ResultsFifty-three percent of patients achieved at least a partial response by cycle 2 (early responders). Rapidity of induction response did not translate into a significant difference in post transplant progression-free survival (PFS) (20.7 vs. 20.0 months; P = .24) or overall survival (OS) (64.4 vs. 51.3 months, respectively; P = .13). In 41 patients (23%) the first induction regimen failed, but they responded to salvage and proceeded to ASCT. They had inferior PFS (15.6 vs. 21.8 months; P = .008) and OS (43.5 vs. 69.4 months; P = .0004) post transplant compared with those requiring 1 regimen.ConclusionRapid response to induction therapy does not correlate with PFS or OS post ASCT when using a conservative steroid-based induction regimen. Patients in whom this initial induction fails have worse post transplant outcomes, thus the upfront use of intensive therapies with novel agents should be considered.     

Long-term outcome of autologous stem-cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess prognostic factors and outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) who received high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT).Patients and methodsData on 195 patients who received ASCT between 1985 and June 2005 were reviewed. Median time from first treatment to ASCT was 2.6 years (0.4–27.3). Demography at ASCT was 61% stage IV, median age 31 years (18–69), median prior treatment (tx) regimens 3 (2–7), median Hasenclever index 3 (0–6); 150 patients had responding disease [54 complete remission (CR), 96 partial remission (PR)], and 45 patients had untested relapse/refractory disease.ResultsPost-ASCT, 61% (119/195) patients attained CR with an overall response (CR + PR) of 85%. Twelve patients had nonrelapse mortality. Of 119 patients attaining CR, 27 relapsed: 3 after attaining CR for >5 years and 1 after attaining CR for >10 years. Median overall survival (OS)/progression-free survival (PFS) from ASCT was 9 years/2.9 years. Five-year OS/PFS was 55% of 44% and 10-year OS/PFS was 49.4% of 37% for whole group. Twenty (10%) patients developed second cancer (seven secondary acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)). Probability of developing second cancer at 10 years was 14.7% (95% confidence interval 8.9% to 23.8%) and 24.8% at 19 years.ConclusionThese data provide the longest follow-up reported for patients receiving ASCT for relapsed/refractory HL. In addition to previously described prognostic factors, our data show that Hasenclever index <3 influences outcome favorably and attaining CR at ASCT leads to a better outcome.     

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of relapsed follicular lymphoma after autologous stem cell transplantation in the rituximab era

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a therapeutic option for patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL). The clinical characteristics and outcomes of FL relapse after ASCT in the rituximab era have not yet been fully elucidated. We retrospectively reviewed 414 FL patients treated with ASCT between 2000 and 2014 in four hematology departments. All patients received rituximab as a first-line treatment. We specifically analyzed the clinical characteristics, treatment strategies at relapse, and outcomes of 95 patients (23%) who relapsed after ASCT. The patients (median age, 57 y) received a median of two lines of therapy (range, 2-6) prior to ASCT, with 92% in complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) before ASCT. Histological transformation at relapse after ASCT was observed in 20% of the patients. Treatment at relapse after ASCT consisted of chemotherapy with or without rituximab (n = 45/90, 50%), targeted agents (18%), rituximab monotherapy (14%), or consolidation allogeneic transplantation after induction chemotherapy (12%) and radiotherapy (6%). After relapse, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1 year (95% CI, 0.541-1.579) and 5.5 years (95% CI, 1.910-9.099), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, histological transformation (HT) was associated with OS (P = .044; HR 2.439; 95% CI, 1.025-5.806), and a high FLIPI score at relapse was associated with PFS (P = .028; HR 2.469; 95% CI, 1.104-5.521). This retrospective study showed that the period of PFS of patients who relapsed after ASCT is short. A biopsy should be performed for these patients to document the HT. Our results indicate that new treatment strategies will need to be developed for these patients.