改良Stoppa入路与髂腹股沟入路手术治疗髋臼骨折疗效比较

目的比较采用改良Stoppa入路与髂腹股沟入路切开复位内固定治疗髋臼骨折的效果。方法回顾性分析自2011-01—2016-06行切开复位内固定治疗的32例髋臼骨折,16例采用改良Stoppa入路(观察组),16例采用髂腹股沟入路(对照组)。比较2组切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、切口引流量、住院时间,术后骨折复位质量,以及末次随访时髋关节功能Harris评分。结果 32例均获得随访,随访时间平均13(8~25)个月。观察组切口长度较对照组短,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);但2组手术时间、术中出血量、切口引流量、住院时间、骨折复位质量、末次随访时髋关节功能Harris评分比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论改良Stoppa入路和髂腹股沟入路切开复位内固定治疗髋臼骨折均可获得满意的疗效,但改良Stoppa入路手术切口小,软组织损伤少,显露良好,能直视四边体骨折,骨折复位质量可靠。     

改良Stoppa入路在不稳定骨盆与髋臼骨折内固定术中的应用

目的比较髂腹股沟入路与改良Stoppa入路切开复位内固定治疗不稳定骨盆与髋臼骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析自2016-02—2018-02手术治疗的106例不稳定骨盆与髋臼骨折,53例采用改良Stoppa入路行切开复位内固定(观察组),53例采用髂腹股沟入路行切开复位内固定(对照组)。结果 106例均获得至少12个月随访,随访期间未出现深部感染、骨折不愈合、内固定断裂等并发症。观察组切口长度较对照组短,术中出血量较对照组少,并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);但两组切口显露时间、术后住院时间、骨折复位质量、髋关节功能D’AubignePostel评分差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论改良Stoppa入路切开复位内固定治疗不稳定骨盆与髋臼骨折疗效优于髂腹股沟入路手术,术中创伤小,骨折复位固定可靠,患者恢复良好。     

新改良Stoppa入路治疗骨盆、髋臼骨折

目的 总结新改良Stoppa入路治疗骨盆、髋臼骨折的临床经验,探讨其应用价值.方法 采用新改良Stoppa入路手术治疗骨盆、髋臼骨折患者19例.骨盆骨折者采用前路钢板固定后应用骨盆外固定器进行固定;髋臼骨折者如后柱骨折移位较大,联合应用髋关节后外侧入路.结果 切口长度10～13(11.04±0.73)cm,手术时间80～270(120.33±35.80)min,术中出血量400～1 200(601.47±176.92)ml,无手术并发症.根据Matta评分对术后X线片进行测量,骨折复位优16例,良3例.15例患者获得随访,时间3～9个月.13例功能满意,2例患侧髋部偶有疼痛,其中1例有轻度跛行.结论 新改良Stoppa入路具有切口小、解剖清晰、固定操作简单等优点,作为髂腹股沟入路之外的选择,在治疗骨盆、髋臼骨折时具有独到的应用价值.     

方形区支撑钢板治疗骨质疏松性髋臼骨折

目的探讨方形区支撑钢板治疗骨质疏松性髋臼骨折的临床疗效。方法采用改良Stoppa入路结合方形区支撑钢板行切开复位内固定技术治疗25例老年骨质疏松性髋臼骨折患者。采用改良Matta髋臼骨折复位标准、PMA功能评分标准、HHS髋关节评分评价术后疗效。记录随访过程中出现的并发症。结果 25例患者均获得随访,时间12～35个月。手术时间80～160 min,术中出血量400～1 200 ml。术后次日根据改良Matta髋臼骨折复位标准评价疗效:解剖复位13例,良好复位9例,不满意复位3例。末次随访时,根据改良PMA髋关节功能评分评价疗效:优9例,良14例,可1例,差1例;根据HHS髋关节评分评价疗效:优11例,良6例,可5例,差3例。随访过程中有3例二次行全髋关节置换术。结论采用改良Stoppa入路结合方形区支撑钢板行切开复位内固定技术治疗骨质疏松性髋臼骨折,具有临床疗效可靠、并发症少等特点,治疗前柱髋臼骨折临床疗效更佳。     

Stoppa入路治疗骨盆、髋臼骨折的疗效

目的探讨应用Stoppa手术入路治疗骨盆、髋臼骨折的疗效。方法采用Stoppa入路切开复位内固定治疗20例骨盆、髋臼骨折患者,其中骨盆骨折12例,髋臼骨折8例。12例骨盆骨折中使用Stoppa入路8例,Stoppa入路联合髂窝入路4例;8例髋臼骨折中使用Stoppa入路4例,Stoppa入路联合K-L入路2例,联合髂窝入路2例。结果 20例均获得随访,时间12~36个月。骨折均愈合。术后根据Matta影像学评分:12例骨盆骨折复位均为优,髋臼骨折复位优6例、良2例。依据改良的Merle d'Aubigne-Postel髋关节评分标准评价疗效:优18例,良2例。结论 Stoppa入路治疗骨盆、髋臼骨折可以获得良好的放射学及临床结果,对骨盆高位耻骨支骨折及髋臼四边体骨折的治疗具有优越性。     

改良Stoppa入路手术治疗髋臼骨折的体会

目的探讨改良Stoppa入路在髋臼骨折手术治疗中的应用。方法笔者自2012-01—2015-12应用改良Stoppa入路手术治疗26例髋臼骨折,观察术后疗效。结果术后骨折复位情况根据Matta影像学评分标准评定:解剖复位6例,满意复位18例,不满意复位2例。26例获平均16.5(6~26)个月随访,末次随访疗效按照Matta功能评分标准评定:优15例,良10例,可1例。结论改良Stoppa入路在手术治疗髋臼骨折时能清楚显露耻骨梳、髋臼内壁、方形区,方便骨折复位固定,并发症少,疗效满意。     

改良Stoppa入路治疗骨盆髋臼骨折

目的探讨改良Stoppa入路治疗骨盆、髋臼骨折的手术方法及疗效。方法应用改良Stoppa入路手术治疗18例涉及前柱的髋臼骨折和骨盆前环骨折的患者,其中5例患者辅以髂窝入路或后方K-L入路。应用Matta标准和Majeed功能评分系统对骨折复位及术后功能进行评价。结果切口长度6~12 cm,手术时间50~150 min,术中出血量400~1 000 ml。患者均获得随访,时间12~36个月。根据Matta标准,12例解剖复位,6例复位满意。末次随访时根据Majeed标准评定疗效:优13例,良5例。结论改良Stoppa入路适用于前路手术的骨盆、髋臼骨折的治疗,其显露充分,骨折复位方便,并发症少,疗效满意。     

旁腹直肌切口改良Stoppa入路治疗单侧髋臼骨折

目的探讨应用旁腹直肌切口改良Stoppa入路治疗单侧髋臼骨折的治疗效果。方法对11例单侧髋臼骨折采用旁腹直肌切口改良Stoppa入路,复位后用重建钛板固定。结果本组随访3～21个月。根据Matta影像学评分,髋臼骨折解剖复位9例,满意复位2例。结论旁腹直肌切口改良Stoppa入路治疗单侧髋臼骨折,具有操作便捷、显露充分、并发症少等优点。     

应用改良Stoppa入路手术治疗骨盆髋臼骨折的疗效分析

目的探讨应用改良Stoppa入路手术治疗骨盆、髋臼骨折的手术方法及疗效。方法笔者回顾分析自2010-01—2014-12应用改良Stoppa入路手术治疗的48例骨盆、髋臼骨折的临床资料,其中骨盆骨折34例,髋臼骨折14例。结果所有患者获随访6个月~5年,平均24个月。本组手术切口长度(9.2±2.7)cm,手术时间(1.7±0.7)h,出血量(545±230)ml。术后X线片示骨折复位满意,末次随访时疗效根据Matta功能评分标准评定:优36例,良10例,可2例,优良率95.8%。1例术中发生膀胱破裂,1例术后发生深静脉血栓,无切口感染、骨折不愈合、股外侧皮神经麻痹、腹股沟疝及医源性血管神经损伤等并发症发生。结论改良Stoppa入路手术治疗骨盆髋臼骨折具有操作安全、创伤小、视野清晰、骨折易于复位及固定、疗效可靠、并发症少等优点,具有一定的临床应用价值。     

改良Stoppa入路联合髂嵴前入路及K-L入路治疗复杂髋臼骨折合并骨盆骨折

[目的]探讨应用改良Stoppa联合髂嵴前入路及Kocher-Langenbeck三种手术入路联合治疗髋臼骨折合并骨盆环骨折的临床疗效。[方法]2013年6月~2014年7月,采用改良Stoppa入路联合髂嵴前入路重建钛板固定髋臼前柱及前壁骨折结合K-L入路固定髋臼后壁及后柱技术,治疗10例骨盆骨折患者,男7例,女3例;年龄31~60岁,平均42.8岁。髋臼骨折按照Judet分型:分为T型骨折、双柱骨折。采用Matta评估标准评定骨折复位情况,采用Matta评分标准评定术后功能情况。[结果]10例患者均获随访,时间4~13个月,平均7.3个月。手术时间80~140 min,平均100 min。术中出血量500~900 ml,平均780 ml。骨折愈合时间为12~16周,平均14周。骨折复位按照Matta评估标准:解剖复位6例,满意复位4例。术后功能评定按Matta评分标准:优7例,良2例,可1例。[结论]应用改良Stoppa联合髂嵴前入路及K-L入路治疗复杂髋臼骨折合并骨盆骨折,可以充分利用每种切口的优势,具有相对减少创伤、手术操作安全、并发症少、复位容易、固定牢靠、可早期活动的优点,是一种比较理想的手术方法。     

Internal fracture fixation using the Stoppa approach in pelvic ring and acetabular fractures: technical aspects and operative results

BACKGROUND: The ilioinguinal approach is well established for the treatment of pelvic fractures. As an alternative, the modified Stoppa approach can be used to expose pelvic and acetabular fractures. We describe our experience with this approach in patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures with respect to fracture reduction, technical aspects, and the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications. METHODS: This retrospective study describes a series of 25 consecutive patients where a modified Stoppa approach was used for pelvic or acetabular fracture fixation. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with acetabular fractures, six patients with a pelvic ring injury not involving the acetabular joint and four patients with a combined fracture were operated through a Stoppa approach. Nine patients had a total of 13 complications, none of which required reoperation. Anatomic or satisfactory reduction was achieved in 95% of the acetabular fractures. Pelvic ring fractures had an anatomic (displacement <1 cm) postoperative result in all 10 cases. CONCLUSION: The modified Stoppa approach allows an adequate exposure and good postoperative results for treatment of pelvic ring fractures and acetabular fractures that are eligible for an anterior approach.     

临床应用改良Stoppa入路手术治疗髋臼骨折

目的报告改良Stoppa入路手术治疗髋臼骨折的临床效果。方法自2006年1月至2011年1月,应用改良Stoppa入路手术治疗髋臼骨折患者共28例,男17例,女11例;年龄25~52岁,平均36.5岁。损伤后手术时间3~9 d,平均7 d。骨折类型包括:前柱和前壁骨折、横形骨折以及双柱骨折。行耻骨联合上2 cm横行切口,长度约为12cm,从下向上将腹白线纵行切开,进入腹膜外。将腹直肌、髂腰肌、股神经及髂血管等结构向外向前牵开进入骨折部位。结果术后随访2.5~6年,平均4.5年。骨折8~12周愈合(平均10周)。没有发生医源性大血管和神经损伤以及异位骨化。没有出现与该项技术相关的并发症。按Matta等提出的髋臼骨折疗效评定标准评定,优18例,良7例,尚可2例,差1例,优良率为89.28%,取得了满意的效果。结论改良Stoppa入路对治疗髋臼骨折提供了一种新的手术方法,能改善髋臼骨折的复位与固定。     

Short-term results of surgical treatment of acetabular fractures using the modified Stoppa approach

BackgroundAs the more commonly used ilioinguinal approach is extensive and associated with complications arising from the dissection along the inguinal canal, we attempt to evaluate the efficacy of the modified Stoppa approach as an alternative in the operative management of acetabular fractures.MethodsTwenty-three patients with acetabular fractures, were operated by the modified Stoppa approach. Fractures were classified; operative time and blood loss were recorded; the radiological and clinical outcomes were prospectively analysed. We analysed the radiological results according to the criteria of Matta and the clinical results by the Merle d’Aubigne and Postel score with a mean follow up of 15.13 months.ResultsThe clinical outcomes were excellent or good in nineteen cases, fair and poor in two patients each. In eighteen of our cases the reduction was anatomic, imperfect in two cases, and poor in three cases. The mean pre-operative displacements on axial, sagittal and coronal NCCT sections were 3.8, 3.1 and 3.6 mm, respectively; and mean post-operative displacements were 0.2, 0.3 and 0.2 mm, respectively. The mean pre-operative and post-operative fracture gap were 12.8 mm and 1.1 mm respectively.ConclusionsMinimizing perioperative morbidity and simultaneously allowing access for anatomical reduction are the major benefits of the approach. The modified Stoppa approach can substitute the ilioinguinal approach for the surgical fixation of acetabular fractures.     

Short-term results of surgical treatment of acetabular fractures using the modified Stoppa approach

BackgroundAs the more commonly used ilioinguinal approach is extensive and associated with complications arising from the dissection along the inguinal canal, we attempt to evaluate the efficacy of the modified Stoppa approach as an alternative in the operative management of acetabular fractures.MethodsTwenty-three patients with acetabular fractures, were operated by the modified Stoppa approach. Fractures were classified; operative time and blood loss were recorded; the radiological and clinical outcomes were prospectively analysed. We analysed the radiological results according to the criteria of Matta and the clinical results by the Merle d’Aubigne and Postel score with a mean follow up of 15.13 months.ResultsThe clinical outcomes were excellent or good in nineteen cases, fair and poor in two patients each. In eighteen of our cases the reduction was anatomic, imperfect in two cases, and poor in three cases. The mean pre-operative displacements on axial, sagittal and coronal NCCT sections were 3.8, 3.1 and 3.6 mm, respectively; and mean post-operative displacements were 0.2, 0.3 and 0.2 mm, respectively. The mean pre-operative and post-operative fracture gap were 12.8 mm and 1.1 mm respectively.ConclusionsMinimizing perioperative morbidity and simultaneously allowing access for anatomical reduction are the major benefits of the approach. The modified Stoppa approach can substitute the ilioinguinal approach for the surgical fixation of acetabular fractures.     

改良Stoppa入路在髋臼骨折中应用探讨

目的 评价改良Stoppa入路在治疗髋臼骨折中的疗效.方法 回顾性分析我科2006年1月至2012年1月间手术治疗部分髋臼骨折72例的临床资料,其中应用单一髂腹股沟入路治疗41例,应用改良Stoppa入路治疗31例.结果 髂腹股沟组平均手术用时125.4 min,术中平均出血量为650 mL,术后出现深部感染1例,股外侧皮神经损伤2例,异位骨化1例,患侧下肢深静脉血栓1例;改良Stoppa组平均手术用时85.8 min,术中平均出血量为410mL,术后出现患侧深静脉血栓1例.骨折复位情况按Matta复位标准,髂腹股沟组复位满意率为85.4％,改良Stoppa组为87.1％.两组患者均获随访9个月～3年,平均15.7个月,骨折处均骨性愈合.关节功能按照改良的MerledAubigne和Postel评分系统进行评估,髂腹股沟组优良率为82.9％,改良Stoppa组为83.9％.两组复位满意率、关节功能优良率及并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);而手术用时及术中出血量,改良Stoppa组明显少于髂腹股沟组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论 与髂腹股沟入路相比,改良Stoppa入路具有显露充分、创伤小、并发症少,、出血少的优点,某些情况下可替代传统的髂腹股沟入路,是治疗髋臼骨折的理想入路之一.     

Severe intraoperative vascular bleeding as main complication of acetabular fractures treated with plate osteosynthesis via the modified Stoppa approach

Acetabular fractures are challenging fractures and finding the best supportive treatment is complex. Many operative treatment options exist – one of them is the plate osteosynthesis via the modified Stoppa approach gaining popularity over the last decades. The purpose of this study is to give an overview of this surgical techniques and its main complications.Patients ≥ 18 years between the years 2016 and 2022 with acetabular fractures in our department received a surgical intervention with plate fixation via the modified Stoppa approach. All protocols and documents during a patient's hospital stay were analyzed to find relevant perioperative complications concerning this operative technique.Between 01/2016 und 12/2022 75 patients with acetabular fractures were treated surgically in the author's institution with a plate osteosynthesis via the modified Stoppa approach. In 26.7 % (n = 20) of all cases, patients were confronted with one or more perioperative complications typical for this operation. Intraoperative venous bleedings were the main complication with 10.6 % (n = 8). Postoperative functional impairment of the obturator nerve and deep vein thrombosis occurred with 2.7 % (n = 2) and 9.3 % (n = 7).This retrospective study shows that plate fixation via the Stoppa approach is a good treatment option because of the excellent intraoperative overview of the fracture, but has its pitfalls and complications. Especially severe vascular bleedings must be taken into account and its management well known.     

Modified Stoppa approach for operative treatment of acetabular fractures: 10-year experience and mid-term follow-up

IntroductionThe (modified) Stoppa approach for acetabular fracture surgery has gained significant popularity and early results have been encouraging but clinical outcome at extensive follow-up is scarce. The purpose of this study is to provide an update on our experience with this approach for operative treatment of acetabular fractures and to assess clinical outcome at mid-term follow-up.MethodsIn this retrospective study, all patients treated operatively for an acetabular fracture using the Stoppa approach over a 10-year period were included. Surgery details were reviewed and patients were contacted and requested to return for follow-up. Primary outcome was native hip survivorship, secondary outcome measures included; functional outcome (Merle d’Aubiginé, Harris hip) scores, health-related quality of life (short-form 36) and radiographic outcome (heterotopic ossification, hip osteoarthritis).ResultsForty-five patients received operative fixation for 47 acetabular fractures using the Stoppa approach. Complications requiring surgical intervention were found in one patient (with a vascular lesion) intra-operatively and 3 patients (with wound infections (2) and diffuse bleeding (1)) post-operatively. Follow-up was 83% and 29/39 (74%) native hips survived at mean 59 months (SD 49) postoperatively. Excellent-good functional scores were found in 88% (Merle d’Aubiginé) and 76% (Harris hip) of patients who had retained their native hip. Most (6/8) short-form 36 indices in these patients were comparable to population norms. Of 29 native hips with radiographic follow-up (mean 59 months (SD 49), 4 (86%) had no-minimal radiographic abnormalities.ConclusionThis study confirms that the Stoppa approach is a safe and effective technique for acetabular fracture fixation. Moreover, at mid-term follow-up, this approach is associated with satisfactory results in terms of hip survivorship as well as functional and radiographic outcome. As such, our findings reinforce the notion that this less invasive technique presents a valuable alternative to the ilioinguinal approach for the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures.     

Stoppa入路在骨盆髋臼骨折中的初步应用

目的 探讨在骨盆髋臼骨折中采用耻骨联合上缘横形或下腹正中切口,真骨盆内操作(Stoppa人路)的初步临床经验. 方法对2008年3月至11月问应用Stoppa入路治疗的10例骨盆髋臼骨折患者进行总结.5例骨盆患者均为Tile C型,Stoppa入路复位同定前环的高位耻骨支骨折.髋臼骨折为横行2例,双柱、T型及后柱(四边体粉碎骨折伴中心脱位)骨折各1例,单纯Stoppa入路2例,联合Kocher-Langenbeck及髂腹股沟入路3例. 结果所有骨盆骨折均复位优,所有髋臼骨折均解剖复位.Stoppa入路平均切口长度10 cm(9～12 cm),平均手术时间88 min(75～105 min),半均出血560 mL(250～800 mL),无手术并发症.7例获得4～8个月随访,功能结果均满意. 结论 Stoppa入路可以替代髂腹股沟入路治疗高位耻骨支骨折,也可单独或联合其他入路治疗髋臼骨折,具有操作简单、并发症少的优点.     

Stoppa入路在骨盆髋臼骨折中的初步应用

目的 探讨在骨盆髋臼骨折中采用耻骨联合上缘横形或下腹正中切口,真骨盆内操作(Stoppa人路)的初步临床经验. 方法对2008年3月至11月问应用Stoppa入路治疗的10例骨盆髋臼骨折患者进行总结.5例骨盆患者均为Tile C型,Stoppa入路复位同定前环的高位耻骨支骨折.髋臼骨折为横行2例,双柱、T型及后柱(四边体粉碎骨折伴中心脱位)骨折各1例,单纯Stoppa入路2例,联合Kocher-Langenbeck及髂腹股沟入路3例. 结果所有骨盆骨折均复位优,所有髋臼骨折均解剖复位.Stoppa入路平均切口长度10 cm(9～12 cm),平均手术时间88 min(75～105 min),半均出血560 mL(250～800 mL),无手术并发症.7例获得4～8个月随访,功能结果均满意. 结论 Stoppa入路可以替代髂腹股沟入路治疗高位耻骨支骨折,也可单独或联合其他入路治疗髋臼骨折,具有操作简单、并发症少的优点.