Validation of the Hungarian version of the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire

Abstract

Purpose: To create a cross-culturally adapted and clinically valid Hungarian version of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ). Methods: After the translation and cross-cultural adaptation process, a total of 133 patients were included into the quality measurement study. Validity and reliability domains of the Hungarian RMQ were tested following the COSMIN guideline. Differences between clinically different patient groups were measured. Correlations of the RMQ with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF assessment (WHOQoL) and pain were also calculated. To assess the reliability dimension, internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) was determined and the test–retest method was used to calculate the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC). Results: Patients indicated for surgery or having neurological deficit had significantly higher RMQ scores. RMQ strongly correlated with pain (r?=?0.61), ODI (r?=?0.81) and physical subscale of WHOQoL (r?=??0.7). Reliability of the Hungarian RMQ was expressed with a Cronbach’s α of 0.87, ICC of 0.91 (p?<?0.001) and SEM and MDC as 1.71 and 4.74 points, respectively. Conclusions: Translation and cross-cultural adaptation process of the RMQ into Hungarian language was successful resulting in a reliable and valid measurement tool with good psychometric properties.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Low back pain (LBP) related disability is a big health, social and economical problem in industrial countries.

• Correct evaluation of spine related disability can be performed using valid and reliable national versions of condition specific patient reported questionnaires such as the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ).

• After the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian RMQ, it can be reliably used for the evaluation of LBP patients and for their follow-up during a rehabilitation process.

     

Does anterior trunk pain predict a different course of recovery in chronic low back pain?

Patient characteristics associated with the course and severity of low back pain (LBP) and disability have been the focus of extensive research, however, known characteristics do not explain much of the variance in outcomes. The relationship between anterior trunk pain (ATP) and LBP has not been explored, though mechanisms for visceral referred pain have been described. Study objectives were: (1) determine prevalence of ATP in chronic LBP patients, (2) determine whether ATP is associated with increased pain and disability in these patients, and (3) evaluate whether ATP predicts the course of pain and disability in these patients. In this study, spinal outpatient department patients mapped the distribution of their pain and patients describing pain in their chest, abdomen or groin were classified with ATP. Generalized estimating equations were performed to investigate the relationship between ATP and LBP outcomes. A total of 2974 patients were included and 19.6% of patients reported ATP. At all time points, there were significant differences in absolute pain intensity and disability in those with ATP compared with those without. The presence of ATP did not affect the clinical course of LBP outcomes.     

How effective is the acute low back pain screening questionnaire for predicting 1-year follow-up in patients with low back pain?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate potential associations between the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire (ALBPSQ), a biopsychosocial screening instrument for identifying patients at risk of chronicity, and relevant variables at 1-year follow-up in a cohort of patients with low back pain. STUDY DESIGN: A 1-year prospective study was conducted in which patients who had previously received treatment in the Northern Ireland National Health Service (n = 118) were requested to complete a follow-up questionnaire package of pain and functional disability measures and a patient-centered questionnaire of seven variables considered relevant from the patient's perspective. PATIENTS: Ninety patients (76% response rate) returned the completed questionnaire package. RESULTS: The ALBPSQ total score and cutoff score of 112 were significantly positively associated with the pain and functional disability questionnaire scores at follow-up but did not significantly discriminate for difference scores on these measures. Although six of the seven patient-centered variables were significantly associated with the screening questionnaire total score, the cutoff score was strongly predictive of only one variable (work loss) and failed to demonstrate high levels of sensitivity for other variables (i.e., medication use, additional treatment, poor exercise participation). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrate that scores on the ALBPSQ were positively correlated with patients' levels of pain and functional disability at 1-year follow-up and correctly classified all patients reporting some degree of work loss but had minimal predictive strength for the other patient-centered variables evaluated.     

Health care providers communicate less well with patients with chronic low back pain – A study of encounters at a back pain clinic in Denmark

We aimed to study the quality of communication between health care providers and patients with low back pain with emphasis on information giving in a back pain clinic, including if characteristics of patients could be associated with communication quality. We videotaped 79 encounters in which 21 providers informed patients about the results of magnetic resonance imaging of the back. Background information about the patients was collected by questionnaires and interview after the encounter. Videotapes were analysed with the Four Habits Coding Scheme (4HCS) in which higher scores mean better communication. There were strong negative correlations between 4HCS scores and the duration of back pain, and patient age. The results were significant for all professional subgroups (doctors, physiotherapists, chiropractors). Communication quality in encounters with back pain patients is worse, the longer the patient has suffered pain. Poor communication quality also seems to be associated with patients being older.     

The effectiveness of a functional training programme for patients with chronic low back pain – a pilot study

Introduction.?To investigate the effect of an individualised functional training programme for patients with low back pain (LBP).

Methods.?A randomised, controlled trial with single-blind design was conducted. Patients with non-specific LBP for at least 3 months were recruited and randomised into training and control groups. Both groups maintained their current treatment, and the training group participated in an additional programme for 100 h. Measures were performed initially and after completing the programme, and included rating determining impairment associated with pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and functional capacity evaluation (FCE).

Results.?Thirteen in the training group completed the training and measurements, and 12 in the control group completed their measurements. Twelve items in FCE had significant improvement in training group, but only one in control group. Severity of pain (11.8 ± 3.6–5.6 ± 3.6), activity limitation from pain (3.2 ± 1.5–1.5 ± 1.1) and emotional disturbance by pain (4.3 ± 1.7–2.2 ± 1.4) significantly decreased in the training group, no significant change in the control group. The ODI demonstrated a significant reduction (p = 0.044) in the training group (22 ± 9–16 ± 9), but not in the control group.

Conclusion.?An individualised functional training programme benefits chronic LBP patients.     

Should chiropractors recommend provocative discography for diagnostic purposes in patients with chronic low back pain?

This paper presents a narrative literature review of provocative discography in chronic low back pain. The literature concerning accuracy and utility, complications, alternatives and use of provocative discography as a determinant for fusion surgery was reviewed. The conclusion is that, at this time, there is insufficient evidence to warrant the recommendation of provocative discography by chiropractors for chronic low back pain patients. There are safer, less costly, less invasive alternatives to discography that show promise and further investigation of the utility of these methods is recommended.     

Does osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine cause chronic low back pain?

The lumbar spine is a common location for osteoarthritis. The axial skeleton demonstrates the same classic alterations of cartilage loss, joint instability, and osteophytosis characteristic of symptomatic disease in the appendages. Despite these similarities, questions remain regarding the lumbar spine facet joints as a source of chronic back pain. The facet joints undergo a progression of degeneration that may result in pain. The facet joints have sensory input from two spinal levels that makes localization of pain difficult. Radiographic studies describe intervertebral disc abnormalities in asymptomatic individuals that are associated with, but not synonymous for, osteoarthritis. Patients who do not have osteoarthritis of the facet joints on magnetic resonance scan do not have back pain. Single photon emission computed tomography scans of the axial skeleton are able to identify painful facet joints with increased activity that may be helped by local anesthetic injections. Low back pain is responsive to therapies that are effective for osteoarthritis in other locations. Osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine does cause low back pain.     

What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire?

Although the Roland disability questionnaire (RDQ) is a commonly used questionnaire for patients with low back pain (LBP), several important issues remain understudied. The purposes of this study were to investigate the impact that several parameters (length of test–retest interval, interpretation of the global perceived effect (GPE) scores, methods to estimate standard error of measurement (SEM), intervention and baseline scores) have on various measurement properties, such as agreement (Limits of Agreement (LOA), SEM_agreement), responsiveness (area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity) and interpretability (optimal cut‐off point, Minimal Detectable Change), of the RDQ. RDQ was administered four times to 212 patients with chronic non‐specific LBP (first consultation (T‐1), eligibility check (T0), randomization/start of treatment (T1) and end of treatment (T2)). They also completed a GPE scale at T2. To study the influence of length of test interval between T‐1, T0 and T1, six time intervals were assessed. Analyses of the impact of parameters on responsiveness and interpretability were based on the GPE score and on RDQ score changes (T1 versus T2). Results revealed that agreement parameters decreased with increasing time interval between test–retest. They confirmed the influence of the interpretation of the GPE as well as of the method to calculate the SEM on the magnitude of the Minimal Detectable Change and ROC parameters. Baseline RDQ scores and the way to cluster patients with regard to baseline scores influenced mainly the optimal cut‐off point and responsiveness parameters; intervention did not affect the magnitude of the Minimal Detectable Change.     

Can demographic and anthropometric characteristics predict clinical improvement in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain?

Objective

To identify potential prognostic factors that may predict clinical improvement of patients treated with different physical therapy interventions in the short-term.

Effectiveness of focused meditation for patients with chronic low back pain—A randomized controlled clinical trial

ObjectivesWe aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an 8-week meditation program (focused meditation) in patients with chronic low-back pain.DesignA randomized clinical trial was conducted on 68 patients (55 years;75% female) with chronic low-back pain who scored >40 mm on a 100 mm Visual-Analogue-Scale. Subjects were allocated to an 8-week meditation program (focused meditation) with weekly 75 min classes or to a self-care exercise program with a wait-list offer for meditation. Both groups were instructed to practice at home. Outcomes were assessed baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change in mean back pain at rest after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included function, pain-related bothersomeness, perceived stress, quality-of-life (QOL), and psychological outcomes.ResultsTwelve (meditation) and 4 (exercise) patients were lost to follow-up. The primary outcome, pain at rest after 8 weeks, was reduced from 59.3 ± 13.9 mm to 40.8 ± 21.8 mm with meditation vs. 52.9 ± 11.8 mm to 37.3 ± 18.2 mm with exercise (adjusted group difference: −1.4 (95%CI:11.6;8.8;p = n.s.) Perceived stress was significantly more reduced with meditation (p = 0.011). No significant treatment effects were found for other secondary outcomes as pain-related bothersomeness, function, quality-of-life and psychological scores, although the meditation group consistently showed non-significant better improvements compared to the exercise group.ConclusionsFocused meditation and self-care exercise lead to comparable, symptomatic improvements in patients with chronic low back pain. Future studies should include longer-term follow-ups and develop guided meditation programs to support compliance.     

Dose or content? Effectiveness of pain rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic low back pain: A systematic review

We sought to systematically analyze the influence of dose of pain rehabilitation programs (PRPs) for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) on disability, work participation, and quality of life (QoL). Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, and Embase up to October 2012, using MeSH terms, other relevant terms and free-text words. Randomized controlled trials in English, Dutch, and German, analyzing the effect of PRPs, were included. One of the analyzed interventions had to be a PRP. Outcomes should be reported regarding disability, work participation, or QoL. To analyze dose, the number of contact hours should be reported. Two reviewers independently selected titles, abstracts, and full-text articles on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted and risk of bias was assessed. Effect sizes (ES) were calculated for each intervention, and influence of dose variables was analyzed by a mixed model analysis. Eighteen studies were identified, reporting a wide variety of dose variables and contents of PRPs. Analyses showed that evaluation moment, number of disciplines, type of intervention, duration of intervention in weeks, percentage of women, and age influenced the outcomes of PRPs. The independent effect of dose variables could not be distinguished from content because these variables were strongly associated. Because dose variables were never studied separately or reported independently, we were not able to disentangle the relationship between dose, content, and effects of PRPs on disability, work participation, and QoL.     

Exercise and chronic low back pain: what works?

The aim of this review was to investigate current evidence for the type and quality of exercise being offered to chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients, within randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and to assess how treatment outcomes are being measured. A two-fold methodological approach was adopted: a methodological assessment identified RCTs of 'medium' or 'high' methodological quality. Exercise quality was subsequently assessed according to the predominant exercise used. Outcome measures were analysed based on current recommendations. Fifty-four relevant RCTs were identified, of which 51 were scored for methodological quality. Sixteen RCTs involving 1730 patients qualified for inclusion in this review based upon their methodological quality, and chronicity of symptoms; exercise had a positive effect in all 16 trials. Twelve out of 16 programmes incorporated strengthening exercise, of which 10 maintained their positive results at follow-up. Supervision and adequate compliance were common aspects of trials. A wide variety of outcome measures were used. Outcome measures did not adequately represent the guidelines for impairment, activity and participation, and impairment measures were over-represented at the expense of others. Despite the variety offered, exercise has a positive effect on CLBP patients, and results are largely maintained at follow-up. Strengthening is a common component of exercise programmes, however, the role of exercise co-interventions must not be overlooked. More high quality trials are needed to accurately assess the role of supervision and follow-up, together with the use of more appropriate outcome measures.     

Multicenter multidisciplinary training program for chronic low back pain: French experience of the Renodos back pain network (Réseau Nord-Pas-de-Calais du DOS)

ObjectivesTo evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of the multidisciplinary training program (MTP). To show the benefits which the network organization brings to the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLPB).MethodsThe member centres of the Renodos back pain network included 748 subjects in the MTP. The centres used a common evaluation protocol including pain and quality of life visual analogue scales (VAS), fingertip-to-floor distance (FFD), muscle isometric endurance tests, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ) and the Hospital Anxiety Depression (HAD) scale. Measurements were carried out before (T0) and immediately after (T1) the intervention, and at the 3-, 6-, 12-month (T3, T6, T12) follow-up visits.ResultsStatistically discernible improvement occurred for men and women on every outcome measure from before to after the MTP (T0–T1, p < 0.0001). This improvement obtained at T1 was maintained for most of the outcome measures throughout the 12-month follow-up. However, the pain intensity and isometric muscle endurance times showed significant negative evolution. Significant differences between genders were found for the trunk flexibility measurement (FFD), the isometric endurance time of the quadratus lumborum muscle, the RDQ and the HAD depression. There was no time–gender interaction.ConclusionThe MTP was effective in reducing back pain intensity, functional disability, symptoms of anxiety and depression and in improving quality of life, flexibility and isometric muscle endurance time. It was possible to propose the MTP to both men and women. A network organization effectively contributes to the harmonization of evaluation methods and brings coherence to the treatment of CLBP patients.     

Can rate of recovery be predicted in patients with acute low back pain? Development of a clinical prediction rule

Some patients with low back pain recover quickly while others continue to experience pain beyond 3 months. The primary aim of this study was to develop a simple prediction rule to help clinicians identify patients with acute low back pain likely to recover at different rates. The secondary aim was to compare a clinician's prognosis judgement to the prediction rule. The study sample included 239 patients with acute low back pain who participated in a randomised controlled trial. The primary outcome was days to recovery from pain. Potential prognostic factors were initially tested for univariate association with recovery using Cox regression (p<0.1). Continuous prognostic factors with a significant association were dichotomised using a median split. Significantly associated prognostic factors were then included in a multivariate forward stepwise Cox regression. We then separated participants into strata according to the number of predictors in the final model for which they were positive. Our results suggest that a clinical prediction rule using three simple prognostic factors was able to differentiate between patients who recover quickly and those who recover slowly. Patients with lower than average initial pain intensity, shorter duration of symptoms and fewer previous episodes recovered more quickly (HR=3.5, 95% CI, 1.8–7.0) than patients without these characteristics. Therapists were able to predict patients likely to recover at different rates, (HR=1.6, 95% CI, 1.2–2.1), however, they did not perform as well as the clinical prediction rule. The rule requires validation in a different sample of patients.     

Do within-session changes in pain intensity and range of motion predict between-session changes in patients with low back pain?

Physiotherapists commonly use post-treatment changes in a patient's pain intensity and range of motion to guide treatment selection and predict possible longer-term outcomes. This study tested the validity of this practice by evaluating the predictive value of within-session changes in pain intensity and range of motion in 53 patients with low back pain. Pain intensity and range of motion measurements of spinal flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and straight-leg-raise were taken by the patient's therapist before and after one treatment session, and were repeated by a blinded therapist at the beginning of the patient's subsequent treatment session. Regression analysis revealed that the strength of association between within-session and between-session changes ranged from r = 0.35 to r = 0.80 for range of motion measurements, and from r = 0.24 to r = 0.47 for pain intensity. Odds ratios for pain and range of motion ranged from 3.5 (95% CI 0.9 to 14.6) to 37.0 (95% CI 4.1 to 330), indicating greater odds of improving between-session if improvement was obtained within-session. These results provide preliminary support for the practice of using within-session changes in pain intensity and range of motion to guide treatment selection when treating impairments in patients with low back pain.