脑深部电刺激治疗帕金森病和特发性震颤的近期和远期疗效

自1987年以后,脑深部电刺激(deep brain stimulation,DBS)成为治疗难治性帕金森病和特发性震颤的主要外科手段。刺激的靶点最先为丘脑腹侧中间核(nucleus ventero-intermedius,Vim)。由于Vim DBS只能缓解震颤,而对于帕金森病的其他核心症状以及多巴长期应用后的不良反应,如运动波动和异动症疗效不显著,1990年后治疗PD的靶点转移到丘脑底核(subthalamic nucleus,STN)和苍白球内侧部(interal globus pallidus,GPi),上述问题在这两个靶点得到显著改善。Vim DBS仍然为治疗特发性震颤的位点。本文就这3个靶点的持续电刺激在治疗帕金森病和特发性震颤的近期和远期疗效等进行评述。     

Thalamic stimulation alleviates levodopa-resistant rigidity in a patient with non-Parkinson’s disease parkinsonian syndrome

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the thalamic ventrointermediate nucleus (Vim) is a useful treatment in patients with tremor-dominant Parkinson’s disease (PD). Efficacy to alleviate rigidity remains controversial. We report a 65-year-old right-handed man with persistent severe rigidity and bradykinesia on the right side despite daily administration of levodopa/carbidopa (600/60 mg). His right-hand tremor was continuous at rest and present at action. His antiparkinsonian medications appeared ineffective and he reported difficulties with writing and eating. Repeated ¹²³I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine myocardial scintigraphy studies demonstrated a non-PD pattern. He underwent the stereotactic implantation of a DBS electrode into the left Vim. Using contacts 1 and 2 we started continuous unipolar stimulation with a pulse generator implanted in a subclavian pocket. This improved the tremor and the rigidity and bradykinesia of his right hand. Postoperative image analysis revealed the likelihood of simultaneous stimulation of the Vim and the nucleus ventralis oralis posterior. Our findings suggest thalamic stimulation as a therapeutic option for drug-resistant rigidity (and tremor) in patients with parkinsonian syndromes ineligible for DBS targeted at the globus pallidus internus or subthalamic nucleus.     

刺激术和毁损术在双侧立体定向手术治疗帕金森病中的比较

目的比较脑深部刺激术和毁损术在双侧立体定向手术治疗帕金森病中的优缺点。方法69例帕金森病病人进行了双侧手术治疗,其中同期双侧丘脑底核(STN)脑深部刺激术(DBS)11例,同期一侧苍白球腹后部毁损术(PVP),另一侧STNDBS3例,分期一侧PVP或腹中间核(Vim)毁损术、另一侧STN或VimDBS9例;分期双侧PVP或Vim毁损术41例,同期双侧PVP5例。平均随访9.3个月。结果UPDRS评分显示刺激术和毁损术均能显著改善对侧肢体震颤、僵硬和运动迟缓症状,双侧刺激术还能改善步态和姿势症状,但双侧毁损术可加重语言、吞咽及流涎等症状,并发症较高。结论双侧DBS是具有双侧症状的帕金森病病人手术治疗的最佳术式,双侧毁损术并发症较高,应严格慎重采用。     

脑深部电刺激对帕金森病二次手术的临床应用价值

目的探讨帕金森病(Parkinson'sdisease,PD)毁损术后再行脑深部电刺激术(deepbrainstimulation,DBS)的可行性、靶点选择、术中电生理学特点和治疗结果。方法应用MRI和微电极记录技术进行靶点定位,对13例毁损术后的PD患者行DBS手术,其中7例曾行单侧苍白球毁损术(posteroventralpallidotomy,PVP),5例曾行单侧丘脑毁损术,1例曾行双侧丘脑及左侧苍白球毁损术。DBS的靶点包括单侧丘脑底核(subthalamicnucleus,STN)6例,单侧丘脑腹中间核(ventralintermediatnucleus,Vim)1例,双侧STN4例,一侧STN及对侧苍白球(globuspallidusinternus,Gpi)2例。结果DBS对毁损术后的PD患者症状有不同程度的改善,其中单侧毁损术后行双侧DBS效果最明显。术后3个月的UPDRS运动及ADL评分较术前明显减少(P<0.05或0.01),美多巴的用量明显减少(P<0.05),无新的手术合并症。结论曾行毁损术的PD患者如面临二次手术,可以选择DBS手术,以双侧STN的DBS效果最好,并可减少药物用量,不加重原有的术后并发症。     

微电极导向VL核和PVP核联合毁损治疗帕金森病

目的：对震颤、僵硬及运动迟缓帕金森病（ＰＤ）患者的立体定向手术方法学进行探讨。方法：应用微电极导向技术,对４３例ＰＤ患者,同侧丘脑腹外侧核（Ｖｉｍ／Ｖｏｐ）及苍白球腹后部（ＰＶＰ）进行联合毁损术。结果：４３例ＰＤ患者的肢体震颤、僵硬及运动迟缓均得到明显改善,术前术后ＭｏｔｏｒＵＰＤＲＳ积分,开状态及关状态均显著改善（Ｐ＜０．０１）,无永久并发症。结论：应用微电极导向立体定向技术对伴有肢体震颤、强直及运动迟缓的ＰＤ患者,行同侧Ｖｉｍ核和ＰＶＰ核联合毁损手术,能全面改善ＰＤ患者的症状,是一种安全有效的手术方法。     

Temporal changes in movement time during the switch of the stimulators in Parkinson's disease patients treated by subthalamic nucleus stimulation

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a very effective therapy for the advanced phase of Parkinson's disease (PD). The functional inhibition of this nucleus is responsible for a significant improvement of cardinal motor symptoms of PD. The aim of the study was the assessment of the effectiveness of STN DBS on bradykinesia by the analysis of movement time (MT) in 2 conditions: with the stimulators turned on ('stim-on') or off ('stim-off'). METHODS: After pharmacological wash-out, 10 patients submitted to bilateral STN DBS were studied with an MT analyser in 3 phases: stim-on, stim-off and stim-on again, in order to establish the time course of MT lengthening, the posteffect duration and the latency of the effect of STN DBS. MT data were then compared with the UPDRS motor scores. RESULTS: After turning off the stimulators, MT progressively increases, reaching a plateau after about 30 min, which then lasts for the subsequent observation time (2 h). A significant elongation is achieved after the first 5 min. Upon pulse generator activation, MT shows a dramatic shortening, already significant after 2 min. Moreover, we observed a significant correlation between MT and the severity of PD, higher with bradykinesia than with rigidity or tremor. CONCLUSION: Our findings show a relevant effect of STN DBS on MT, a parameter strongly related to bradykinesia. This study confirms the effectiveness of STN inhibition on the whole parkinsonian triad, suggesting that this target can be considered a proper choice for the surgical treatment of advanced PD.     

Thalamic, pallidal, or subthalamic surgery for Parkinson's disease?

Levodopa is a highly effective treatment of all motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. However, long-term treatment with levodopa can lead to motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Motor side effects can become so disabling as to warrant surgical treatment. Both ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) can be performed in different target areas. Thalamic surgery mainly improves tremor, and to a lesser extent also rigidity and dyskinesias, whereas pallidal and subthalamic nucleus surgery improves all motor symptoms and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. The efficacy and safety of unilateral pallidotomy is well established. DBS has a lower morbidity and is safe enough to be performed bilaterally. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) presently seems to be the most promising target for DBS in advanced stage PD.     

Comparative effects of unilateral and bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of unilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) with bilateral STN DBS in advanced PD. METHODS: Our initial 10 consecutive patients with medication-refractory motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesias undergoing chronic bilateral STN DBS underwent a standardized evaluation of unilateral and bilateral STN DBS in the medication-off state 6 to 18 months after electrode implantation. RESULTS: Bilateral STN DBS improved the mean total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score by 54%, whereas unilateral stimulation improved motor scores only 23%. Unilateral STN DBS improved postural stability and gait 14%, other axial motor features 19%, and overall parkinsonism in limbs contralateral to stimulation by 46%, including an 86% improvement in contralateral tremor. However, bilateral STN DBS resulted in greater improvement in each of these domains, including limb function, i.e., the reduction in scores from the limbs on one side was greater with bilateral than with unilateral stimulation of the contralateral STN. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral STN DBS improves parkinsonism considerably more than unilateral STN DBS; bilateral simultaneous electrode implantation may be the most appropriate surgical option for patients with significant bilateral disability. Unilateral STN DBS results in moderate improvement in all aspects of off-period parkinsonism and improves tremor as much as is typically reported with DBS of the ventral intermedius nucleus of the thalamus (Vim). For this reason, STN DBS may be a more appropriate choice than Vim DBS or thalamotomy for parkinsonian tremor. Some patients with highly asymmetric tremor-dominant PD might be appropriately treated with unilateral instead of bilateral STN DBS.     

Deep brain stimulation in the management of Parkinson's disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical treatment of Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders. This surgical technique is applied to three brain targets: the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim), the globus pallidus internus (Gpi) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Vim DBS improves contralateral parkinsonian tremor. STN and GPi DBS improve contralateral bradykinesia, rigidity, parkinsonian tremor and also levodopa-induced dyskinesia. There is little comparative data between bilateral STN and bilateral GPi procedures but the improvement with bilateral STN DBS seems more pronounced than with bilateral GPi DBS. Moreover, only STN BDS allows a significant decrease of antiparkinsonian medication. The other advantage of STN over GPi DBS is the lower consumption of current. The DBS procedure contrary to ablative surgery has the unique advantage of reversibility and adjustability over time. Patients with no behavioral, mood and cognitive impairments benefit the most from bilateral STN DBS. The stimulation-induced adverse effects related to DBS are reversible and adjustable. More specific adverse effects related do hardware are: disconnection, lead breaking, erosion or infection. The disadvantage of DBS is a relatively high cost. The setting of stimulation parameters to achieve the best clinical result may be very time-consuming. Most authors agree that DBS is a safer and more favorable procedure than ablative surgery.     

Deep brain stimulation therapy for involuntary movements]

During the last decade, it has become clear that deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy provides a dramatic improvement in the symptoms of movement disorders. We have experienced DBS in 110 patients with various types of involuntary movements, and confirmed the benefits of stimulation of the thalamic nucleus ventralis intermedius (Vim), internal globus pallidus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN) in these patients. DBS therapy affords the best effect on tremor when the Vim is selected as the stimulation site. DBS therapy is also useful for controlling rigidity when the GPi or STN is stimulated. Improvements of bradykinesia and gait disturbance are often induced by DBS therapy involving the GPi or STN. Dopa-induced dyskinesia can be attenuated effectively by the direct and/or indirect effects of DBS therapy. DBS of the Vim also provides excellent control of post-stroke involuntary movements, including hemiballism and hemichoreoathetosis. Dystonia in young patients is controlled effectively by DBS of GPi. Ablative procedures for control of involuntary movement disorders, such as thalamotomy and pallidotomy, always carry a risk associated with creating additional lesions in an already damaged brain. In contrast, there is not such a risk in DBS therapy. This modality of therapy is an important option in treating involuntary movements.     

双侧丘脑底核脑深部刺激术治疗帕金森病13例报告

目的 探讨双侧丘脑底核（STN）脑深部刺激术（DBS）治疗帕金森病的临床经验。方法 从2002年到2005年共完成了13例帕金森病的双侧丘脑底核DBS，根据STN解剖学定位，靶点的理论坐标值是X=11-13mm，Y=0-2mm，Z=0-4mm，通过立体定向技术在双侧丘脑底核植入刺激电极，并于锁骨下方植入脑深部电刺激器。结果 随访时间为6个月到3年，3例震颤为主病人的症状完全缓解，即震颤完全消失；僵直和运动迟缓为主要症状者的症状缓解程度达90％以上，其中以四肢肌肉僵直的效果较好，运动迟缓也有明显缓解，但是有1例病人双侧肢运动协调性差。所有患者植物神经功能症状有较明显改善，如便秘、流涎、出汗和浮肿等均有改善。结论 DBS治疗帕金森病，是帕金森病治疗的一个里程碑似的进步。它可以明显地缓解帕金森病的主要症状和体征，对运动迟缓、僵直和震颤等均有较理想的效果。     

Parkinson's disease: deep brain stimulation

The effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the internal pallidum (GPi) on the parkinsonian triad and on levodopa-induced dyskinesias are very similar. The antiakinetic effect of STN DBS seems to be slightly better. On the contrary to pallidal DBS, stimulation of the STN allows to reduce dopaminergic treatment by more than 50p.100 on average. Moreover, the current drain is smaller in STN. Thus, the STN is a low budget target compared to the GPi. STN DBS seems to be as effective on PD tremor as stimulation of the classic thalamic target, the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim), whereas Vim stimulation has no effect on akinesia and very little on levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Thus, the STN has become the main target nucleus for DBS in PD, which is most often performed bilaterally in one surgical procedure. There is a good correlation of the preoperative response to levodopa and postoperative effects of bilateral STN DBS and this defines the patient population. Given the large patient population, simple guidelines for patient selection are developed. The referring physician can preselect patients based mainly on age (less than 70), absence of dementia and presence of severe disability related to motor fluctuations or dyskinesias. It is the responsibility of the operating centre to determine the levodopa response, to confirm the diagnosis, to rule out contraindications and to make sure that the medical treatment cannot be further optimised. Severe surgical complications with permanent sequels are relatively rare, about 1p.100 per implanted side. The patient selection, the precision of the surgery and the quality of the postoperative follow-up are the three main determinants of success.     

丘脑底核高频刺激治疗帕金森病

目的：研究脑深部刺激（DBS）对帕金森病（PD）的治疗作用。观察术中丘脑底核（STN）刺激对PD震颤,肌僵直、运动缓慢的缓解效果及对语言的影响,探讨植入刺激电极的最佳位置。方法：17例帕金森病患者,利用MRI及微电极导向立体定向方法将刺激电极植入丘脑底核,其靶点：X=11mm,Y=-1mm,Z=-7mm。术中予以高频刺激（频率为150Hz,脉宽为150μz,脉宽为150μs,电压自0.5V开始,逐渐增至6-8V）;其中有2例进行了STN电极永久性植入慢性电刺激,术后随访6-8月,结果：17例术中刺激发现,STN中上部是其刺激、改善病人症状的最佳位置,而电极过深及过外则易引起言语障碍,2例永久性植入慢性电刺激经随访观察对肌僵直的控制非常满意,对运动缓慢有明显改善,并减少美多巴的服药量,UPDRS运动评分下降50%。结论：STN的高频刺激能改善PD的震颤,僵直,运动缓慢等主要症状,是PD慢性刺激的最理想靶点,其中上部是刺激效果的最佳位置。     

Relationship of clinical efficacy to postmortem-determined anatomic subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson syndrome

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Patients with medically refractory Parkinson's disease (PD) obtain significant clinical benefit from subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation. The degree to which a successful outcome relates to the anatomic location of the stimulating electrode has not yet been clearly established. Many studies have attempted to correlate the clinical result with the electrode location using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and there have been a few that used autopsy-determined locations. In this report, we describe long-term clinical follow-up in a patient with autopsy-determined electrode tip anatomic location. METHODS: A 67-year-old patient with a 27-year history of idiopathic PD complicated by disabling motor fluctuations and dopaminergic dyskinesias underwent bilateral STN deep brain stimulation (DBS). He was prospectively followed in a long-term clinical protocol until his death 40 months after electrode placement. Postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and postmortem studies of this patient's brain were performed to localize DBS tip locations. RESULTS: STN stimulation produced improvement of the patient's motor fluctuations, dyskinesias and clinical motor performance, especially appendicular tremors, rigidity and bradykinesia. MRI showed the electrode tips to be within 2 mm of the intended target. Postmortem brain analysis identified the right DBS tip location at the dorsomedial edge of the STN, with the left electrode in the vicinity (but not within) the STN. Chronic DBS elicited minor reactive changes were confined to the immediate vicinity of the electrode tracks. The pathological analysis demonstrated numerous cortical Lewy bodies and degenerative encephalopathy, establishing the diagnosis of transitional type diffuse Lewy body disease (DLBD) rather than simple PD. CONCLUSION: This patient obtained clinical benefit from STN stimulation typical of that seen for most PD patients. Both the MR analysis and the autopsy demonstrated electrode placement at or outside the boundaries of the STN, suggesting that that clinical efficacy may not depend on electrode location within the central region of the STN.     

Tremor reduction by subthalamic nucleus stimulation and medication in advanced Parkinson’s disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has proved to be effective for tremor in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Most of the recent studies used only clinical data to analyse tremor reduction. The objective of our study was to quantify tremor reduction by STN DBS and antiparkinsonian medication in elderly PD patients using an objective measuring system. Amplitude and frequency of resting tremor and re-emergent resting tremor during postural tasks were analysed using an ultrasound-based measuring system and surface electromyography. In a prospective study design nine patients with advanced PD were examined preoperatively off and on medication, and twice postoperatively during four treatment conditions: off treatment, on STN DBS, on medication, and on STN DBS plus medication. While both STN DBS and medication reduced tremor amplitude, STN DBS alone and the combination of medication and STN DBS were significantly superior to pre- and postoperative medication. STN DBS but not medication increased tremor frequency, and off treatment tremor frequency was significantly reduced postoperatively compared to baseline. These findings demonstrate that STN DBS is highly effective in elderly patients with advanced PD and moderate preoperative tremor reduction by medication. Thus, with regard to the advanced impact on the other parkinsonian symptoms, STN DBS can replace thalamic stimulation in this cohort of patients. Nevertheless, medication was still effective postoperatively and may act synergistically. The significantly superior efficacy of STN DBS on tremor amplitude and its impact on tremor frequency in contrast to medication might be explained by the influence of STN DBS on additional neural circuits independent from dopaminergic neurotransmission. Received in revised form: 27 April 2006     

Randomized trial of pallidotomy versus medical therapy for Parkinson's disease

Thirty-six patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) were randomized to either medical therapy (N = 18) or unilateral GPi pallidotomy (N = 18). The primary outcome variable was the change in total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score at 6 months. Secondary outcome variables included subscores and individual parkinsonian symptoms as determined from the UPDRS. At the six month follow-up, patients receiving pallidotomy had a statistically significant reduction (32% decrease) in the total UPDRS score compared to those randomized to medical therapy (5% increase). Following surgery, patients' showed improvement in all the cardinal motor signs of PD including tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, gait and balance. Drug-induced dyskinesias were also markedly improved. Although the greatest improvement occurred on the side contralateral to the lesion, significant ipsilateral improvement was also observed for bradykinesia, rigidity and drug-induced dyskinesias. A total of twenty patients have been followed for 2 years to assess the effect of time on clinical outcome. These patients have shown sustained improvement in the total UPDRS (p < 0.0001), "off" motor (p < 0.0001) and complications of therapy subscores (p < 0.0001). Sustained improvement was also seen for tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, percent on time and drug-induced dyskinesias.     

Localization of motor and verbal fluency effects in subthalamic DBS for Parkinson's disease

IntroductionSubthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) improves cardinal motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) but can worsen verbal fluency (VF). An optimal site of stimulation for overall motor improvement has been previously identified using an atlas-independent, fully individualized, field-modeling approach. This study examines if cardinal motor components (bradykinesia, tremor, and rigidity) share this identified optimal improvement site and if there is co-localization with a site that worsens VF.MethodsAn atlas-independent, field-modeling approach was used to identify sites of maximal STN DBS effect on overall and cardinal motor symptoms and VF in 60 patients. Anatomic coordinates were referenced to the STN midpoint. Symptom severity was assessed with the MDS-UPDRS part III and established VF scales.ResultsSites for improved bradykinesia and rigidity co-localized with each other and the overall part III site (0.09 mm lateral, 0.93 mm posterior, 1.75 mm dorsal). The optimal site for tremor was posterior to this site (0.10 mm lateral, 1.40 mm posterior, 1.93 mm dorsal). Semantic and phonemic VF sites were indistinguishable and co-localized medial to the motor sites (0.32 mm medial, 1.18 mm posterior, 1.74 mm dorsal).ConclusionThis study identifies statistically distinct, maximally effective stimulation sites for tremor improvement, VF worsening, and overall and other cardinal motor improvements in STN DBS. Current electrode sizes and voltage settings stimulate all of these sites simultaneously. However, future targeted lead placement and focused directional stimulation may avoid VF worsening while maintaining motor improvements in STN DBS.     

Current therapies for parkinson's disease. Part II: surgical treatment

Surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is indicated in patients with severe neurological symptoms (tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity)--who do not benefit from nor tolerate pharmacological therapy. Surgery for PD modifies the motor system function by lesioning or electrostimulation of thalamic, pallidal or subthalamic nuclei. The technological progress together with refined CNS monitoring enabled wider application of deep brain stimulation (DBS). The efficacy of DBS is comparable with lesioning techniques (thalamotomy or pallidotomy) however bears less adverse effects. Both lesioning and DBS are generally well tolerated by patients. The side effects are mostly transient and neurological complications, if occur, usually do not affect quality of patient's life. Unfortunately, the modern surgery for PD is still very expensive and demanding for a large team of specialists and high technology.     

The effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on parkinsonian tremor

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus of the thalamus has been the target of choice for patients with disabling essential tremor or medication refractory parkinsonian tremor. Recently there is evidence that the subthalamic nucleus (STN) should be the targets for patients with tremor associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). To assess the effects of STN DBS on parkinsonian tremor, eight consecutive patients with PD and disabling tremor were videotaped using a standardized tremor protocol. Evaluations were performed at least 12 h after last dose of medication with the DBS turned off followed by optimal DBS on state. A rater blinded to DBS status evaluated randomized video segments with the tremor components of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Tremor Rating Scale (TRS). Compared with DBS off state there were significant improvements in mean UPDRS tremor score 79.4% (p = 0.008), total TRS score 69.9% (p = 0.008) and upper extremity 92.5% (p = 0.008) TRS subscore. Functional improvement was noted with pouring liquids. Our findings provide support that STN DBS is an effective treatment of tremor associated with PD.     

The impact on Parkinson's disease of electrical parameter settings in STN stimulation

BACKGROUND: The main advantage of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of PD is that the electrical settings can be adjusted to optimize benefits and minimize adverse effects. The main objective of this study was to discover how varying these electrical parameters impacted on parkinsonian motor signs. METHODS: Twelve patients with PD with chronic bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation were selected. The authors evaluated the effects of a variation in the voltages, frequencies, and pulse widths on tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity using two different paradigms: one in which the total electrical energy delivered was held constant, and one in which this was varied. Up to 26 parameter conditions were tested under double blind randomized conditions. RESULTS: Voltages >or=3 V and frequencies >or=130 Hz led to the greatest improvement in all three parkinsonian signs. A rate of 5 Hz significantly worsened akinesia. The combination of the highest voltage with the narrowest pulse width was most effective. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the most beneficial effects induced by STN stimulation are obtained at high frequencies and that voltage is the most critical factor to obtain adequate alteration in STN activity. The mechanisms by which STN DBS improves parkinsonism remain speculative.