Peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion can be accomplished by any 1 of 3 techniques. These include dissective or surgical, the blind or modified Seldinger, and laparoscopic techniques. The dissective technique solely utilized by surgeons, places the catheter by mini-laparotomy under general anesthesia. In the blind or modified Seldinger technique a needle is inserted into the abdomen, a guide-wire placed, a tract dilated and the catheter is inserted through a split-sheath, all without visualization of the peritoneal cavity. Of the various laparoscopes, peritoneoscopic insertion uses a small optical peritoneoscope for direct inspection of the peritoneal cavity and identification of a suitable site for the intraperitoneal portion of the catheter. Hence, of the 3 techniques, only the latter allows for the direct visualization of the intraperitoneal structures. This technique can be easily used by nephrologists as well as surgeons. Peritoneoscopic placement varies from traditional laparoscopic techniques by using: a much smaller scope (2.2 mm diameter) and puncture size, only one peritoneal puncture site, a device to advance the cuff into the musculature, air in the peritoneum rather than CO2, and local anesthesia rather than general anesthesia. Prospective randomized and nonrandomized studies have shown that PD catheters peritoneoscopically placed by nephrologists have less incidence of complications (infection, exit site leak) and longer catheter survival rates than those inserted surgically. The current review focuses on the peritoneoscopic insertion of PD catheter and presents some of the complicating issues (bowel perforation, catheter migration, and prior abdominal surgery) related to this procedure.     

High-pressure trocar insertion technique.

BACKGROUND: The majority of laparoscopic complications occur at the time of Veress needle and trocar insertion. Although not very frequent, they increase the morbidity and mortality of both diagnostic and operative laparoscopic procedures. Alternative techniques of trocar insertion have been described but have not completely eliminated the risk of injury. TECHNIQUE: After Veress needle insertion and establishment of pneumoperitoneum to 25 to 30 mm Hg, insertion of a short trocar is performed in the deepest part of the umbilicus without elevation of the anterior abdominal wall. The result is a parietal peritoneal puncture directly beneath the umbilicus. The high-pressure setting used during initial insertion of the trocar is lowered as soon as safe abdominal entry is documented. EXPERIENCE: The trocar insertion technique described above was performed in 3041 procedures. No vascular injury occurred. There were two bowel perforations. No complications related to the increased intra-abdominal pressure were observed. CONCLUSION: The high-pressure abdominal entry technique has the advantage of reducing intra-abdominal trocar-related injuries without requiring additional instrumentation or additional training.     

Direct trocar insertion versus Veress needle insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Direct insertion of the trocar is an alternative method to Veress needle insertion for the creation of pneumoperitoneum. The safety of direct disposable shielded trocar insertion for the creation of pneumoperitoneum was assessed by comparing with Veress needle insertion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: One thousand five hundred patients undergoing LC with pneumoperitoneum were included in this study. In 470 patients the Veress needle insertion technique was used, and in 1,030 patients direct trocar insertion technique was used. Patients having indications for open trocar insertion were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Complication rate was significantly higher in the Veress needle group (14% versus 0.9%; P <0.01), and the two major complications, gastric perforation and iliac artery laceration, were also encountered in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that with a lower complication rate, direct insertion of the disposable trocar is a safe alternative to Veress needle insertion technique for the creation of pneumoperitoneum. Such an approach has further advantages such as less cost/instrumentation and rapid creation of pneumoperitoneum.     

Ultrasound/fluoroscopy-assisted placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters may be inserted blindly, surgically, and either by laparoscopic, peritoneoscopic, or fluoroscopic approach. A modified fluoroscopic technique by adding ultrasound-assistance was performed in the present study to ensure entry into the abdominal cavity under direct ultrasound visualization. From March 2005 to May 2007, ultrasound-fluoroscopic guided placement of PD catheters was attempted in 32 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Preoperative evaluation was performed on all patients prior to the procedure. After initial dissection of the subcutaneous tissue anterior to the anterior rectus sheath, the needle was inserted into the abdominal cavity under the guidance of ultrasound. The position of the epigastric artery was also examined using ultrasonography to avoid the risk of arterial injury. PD catheters were successfully placed in 31 of the 32 ESRD patients using this technique. In all of these patients, the needle could be seen entering the abdominal cavity using an ultrasound. In one patient the procedure was abandoned because of bowel puncture by the micro-puncture needle that was inadvertently advanced into a loop of bowel. This patient did not develop acute abdomen nor needed any intervention. One patient died 4 days after placement of the catheter of unrelated causes. One patient was started on acute peritoneal dialysis the same day of catheter placement without any complications. The rest of the patients started peritoneal dialysis within 2-6 weeks of catheter placement. None of the patients had bleeding related to arterial injury as ultrasound was able to visualize the epigastric artery. Our experience shows that ultrasound-fluoroscopic technique is minimally invasive and allows for accurate assessment of the entry into the abdominal cavity. This technique can avoid the risk of vascular injury altogether.     

Small Trocar Perforation of the Small Bowel: A Case Report

Although laparoscopy is one of the most common surgical procedures done today, bowel perforations can and do occur during the initial insertion of the Veress needle and/or trocar. Recent advances in microlaparoscopy have reduced the morbidity of this complication when encountered. We report a case of small bowel perforation following insertion of a Veress needle with its 2 mm trocar and our minimally invasive intra-operative and postoperative management of the patient.     

The safety and efficacy of direct trocar insertion with elevation of the rectus sheath instead of the skin for pneumoperitoneum

Abdominal access in endoscopic surgery carries a finite risk of visceral injury. Bleeding, subcutaneous emphysema, gastrointestinal tract perforation, minor and major vascular injury, and intraperitoneal adhesions are the potential complications associated with abdominal access and creation of pneumoperitoneum. There are 4 basic techniques used to create pneumoperitoneum: blind Veress needle, direct trocar insertion, optical trocar insertion, and open laparoscopy. Veress needle and direct trocar insertion are blind techniques, and their use can result in severe visceral and vascular injuries. To prevent visceral and vascular injuries caused by the technique used for the creation of pneumoperitoneum, laparoscopic surgeons and gynecologists look for safe and effective laparoscopic access techniques. Direct trocar insertion without previous pneumoperitoneum was reported to be a safe alternative to Veress needle insertion. We carried out this study to compare the ease of use, safety, and efficacy of direct trocar insertion with elevation of the rectus sheath and blind insertion of the Veress needle in laparoscopic surgery. In 578 laparoscopic procedures, the patients were assigned to one of the following groups: blind insertion of the Veress needle (group 1, n = 301) and direct trocar insertion with elevation of the rectus sheath using 2 towel clips (group 2, n = 277). Total complication rates were 15.7% (n = 33) and 3.3% (n = 4) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.05). Direct trocar insertion with elevation of the rectus sheath using 2 towel clips is an easy, safe, and effective technique.     

The direct trocar technique: an alternative approach to abdominal entry for laparoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: The direct trocar technique is an alternative to Veress needle insertion and open laparoscopy for accessing the abdominal cavity for operative laparoscopy. We review our approach to abdominal entry in 1385 laparoscopies performed between September 1993 and June 2000 by our group at Stanford University Hospital, a tertiary Medical Center. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 1385 patients who underwent operative laparoscopy during the study years. The mode of abdominal entry, patient demographics, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS: The transumbilical direct trocar entry method was used in 1223 patients. In 133 patients, the Veress needle insertion technique was used. Open laparoscopy was used in 22 patients. Three (0.21%) major complicadons occurred: 1 enterotomy, 1 omental herniation, and 1 bowel hemiation. One complication was related to primary access (0.072%) in a patient who had an open laparoscopy. She sustained an enterotomy during placement of the primary trocar. The bowel was repaired laparoscopically. No trocar-related injuries occurred among the 1223 patients in whom the direct trocar entry technique was used. One patient had an omental herniation and required a repeat laparoscopy on postoperative day 2. The second patient had a repeat laparoscopy on the 12th postoperative day to repair a bowel herniation. None of our patients required a laparotomy. No vascular injuries occurred. CONCLUSION: Based on our experience, the direct trocar technique is a safe approach to abdominal entry for laparoscopic surgery.     

Eosinophilic peritonitis following air entrapment during peritoneoscopic insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters

Eosinophilic peritonitis following peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion is an infrequent but important complication. While allergic reaction to catheter material has been noted to be a culprit, air infusion into the abdominal cavity has also been highlighted to be a cause of this complication. In this article, we report two patients with end-stage renal disease where air entrapment in the peritoneal cavity during a peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion resulted in eosinophilic peritonitis. The complication resolved with the reabsorption of entrapped intraperitoneal air and treatment with ketotifen. Peritonitis observed in the postoperative period during the peritoneoscopic insertion of a peritoneal dialysis catheter could be the result of air entrapment. Such patients might not require antibiotic therapy or catheter removal. Reabsorption of entrapped air and treatment with ketotifen might be all that is required.     

A novel minimally invasive technique for insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter

The placement of a continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) catheter by conventional open surgical or trocar technique may cause a number of complications such as infection, hemorrhage, leakage, incisional hernia, and visceral organ perforation. Most complications are related to open surgery or insertion of the catheter with the guidewire without direct visualization. Insertion of the catheter laparoscopically under direct visualization has been previously described. The authors who described this technique used two or three ports for the camera and instruments. In this study we describe a laparoscopic technique for insertion of the peritoneal dialysis catheter under direct visualization with use of one-camera port and an accessory 2-mm umbilical incision. This prospective study was performed with the approval of the ethics committee of the Gazi University Hospital, in Ankara, Turkey. There were a total of eight patients: five males and three females, with an average age of 34.3 years (range, 11-54), who underwent laparoscopic CAPD insertion between 1997 and 2000. The catheter was inserted into the abdominal cavity 2 cm below the umbilicus. The subcutaneous tunnel was made with the assistance of a specially designed L-shaped trocar. All patients did well after the operation and had excellent cosmetic results. There was one leak in the early postoperative period, which was treated conservatively. The average operating time was 34.7 minutes (range, 25-45 minutes). The laparoscopic approach for peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion, for management of transmigrated CAPD catheters, and to resolve omental occlusions should be considered as an alternative to open surgery, especially for patients who have peritoneal adhesions secondary to a history of abdominal surgeries or recurrent peritonitis.     

Delayed recognition of inadvertent gut injury during laparoscopy

Bowel injuries, which may occur as a result of the insertion of an insufflation needle or trocar, are a rare complication of laparoscopy. They are generally recognized either immediately or a few days after the operation. We present a case of laparoscopic perforation of the small intestine in a patient who had undergone previous pelvic surgery for an ovarian carcinoma. On ultrasound (US), the patient had multiple hepatic lesions resembling hepatic metastases. To confirm the diagnosis, laparoscopy with guided liver biopsy was performed on the grounds that this procedure is regarded as more appropriate than CT- or US-guided hepatic biopsy. Veress needle and trocar insertion were performed at a proper distance from the abdominal scar. However, the abdominal cavity was not visible after the trocar's insertion due to the unexpected presence of adhesions. This precluded the continuation of the procedure. In the following days, the patient experienced only mild abdominal discomfort. However, 2 weeks after laparoscopy, the patient presented signs of peritoneal reaction and underwent laparotomy. Adhesion-fixing jejunal loops to the anterior abdominal wall were discovered at the site of the trocar puncture. Moreover, two hiatuses of these loops were observed and sutured. The follow-up was uneventful. As this case illustrates, laparoscopic bowel injuries remain an unpredictable event. Recognition of this complication may occur several days after the procedure, as the tamponating effect of adhesions on the jejunal hiatus delays the involvement of the peritoneum.     

Extrapolating Veress needle for directional precision of secondary laparoscopic ports — A handy technique

In today’s era of advanced laparoscopy, it is still not uncommon to encounter potentially lethal port site bleeding during placement of secondary trocars on the perietes. This is usually due to the inadvertent transaction of a subcutaneous/ rectus sheath vessel/s by “blind” insertion of secondary trocar/s. In this regard, we describe a simple and rapid technique of siting a trouble-free port track using a Veress needle. Regarding the technique, once the incision is made for the trocar, the Veress needle is progressively inserted into the peritoneal cavity along the projected trocar path under direct laparoscopic vision from the primary trocar. While doing so, attention is paid to tissue resistance, the precise direction and occurrence of haemorrhage, if any. Subsequently, the trocar follows the same path. Although several methods are described in the literature, judging the correct trajectory for the secondary abdominal trocars still remains elusive. Our technique has the potential to minimize trocar-related morbidity by reducing the force of insertion, gauging the accurate direction and depth for optimum “user-friendly” port placement. Having found this technique to be safe in over 2000 cases, we conclude that it is a simple to reproduce and potentially safe method for securing non-primary abdominal trocars.     

Comparison of direct trocar and veress needle insertion in the performance of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Veress needle insertion, direct trocar insertion and open technique are different methods of establishing pneumoperitoneum to perform a successful laparoscopic procedure. We conducted this study to compare the use of a Veress needle and direct trocar insertion to create pneumoperitoneum. 274 laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations were evaluated. There were no significant differences in the age and gender between Veress needle and direct trocar entry groups. In this study we have seen that the complication rate while performing pneumoperitoneum by direct trocar entrance was less than in Veress needle usage. Direct trocar entrance also reduces the operation time. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy the direct trocar entrance method is a more reliable and less time consuming method than Veress needle usage.     

Comparison of Direct Trocar and Veress Needle Insertion in the Performance of Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Veress needle insertion, direct trocar insertion and open technique are different methods of establishing pneumoperitoneum to perform a successful laparoscopic procedure.

We conducted this study to compare the use of a Veress needle and direct trocar insertion to create pneumoperitoneum. 274 laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations were evaluated. There were no significant differences in the age and gender between Veress needle and direct trocar entry groups.

In this study we have seen that the complication rate while performing pneumoperitoneum by direct trocar entrance was less than in Veress needle usage. Direct trocar entrance also reduces the operation time. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy the direct trocar entrance method is a more reliable and less time consuming method than Veress needle usage.     

Modification of the percutaneous approach to peritoneal dialysis catheter placement under peritoneoscopic visualization: clinical results in 78 patients.

The placement of percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheters under direct peritoneoscopic visualization is a relatively new technique for establishing peritoneal dialysis access. In this study, in which a modification of the Seldinger technique was used to facilitate the placement of the peritoneoscope, the experience with 82 consecutive catheterization procedures in 78 patients is reported. In 2 (2.4%) of 82 catheterization procedures, we were unable to enter the peritoneal cavity but experienced no other complications unique to the percutaneous approach. Of the 80 successful catheterization procedures, 76 represented first-time catheter placement and constituted a population subjected to life-table analysis examining catheter survival rates, the time to first cutaneous exit site or s.c. tunnel infection, and the time to first episode of peritonitis. After a follow-up period of 50.1 patient yr, 11 catheters were lost because of catheter dysfunction. Other clinical complications included peritoneal fluid leaks at the cutaneous exit site in 11 instances (0.22/patient yr), cutaneous exit site infection in 7 instances (0.14/patient yr), s.c. tunnel infection in 2 instances (0.04/patient yr), and 34 episodes of peritonitis (0.68/patient yr). The results of this study demonstrate that the suggested modification of the percutaneous placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters, under peritoneoscopic visualization, is a viable method for establishing peritoneal access.     

Randomized Trial Comparing a Radially Expandable Needle System with Cutting Trocars

Sharp trocar insertion for laparoscopic procedures carries with it increased risk for vascular and visceral complications and incisional hernia. In a trial, which randomized 87 patients to treatment with either sharp trocars or a radially expanding needle system with blunt dilator, results showed that with the latter system there was statistically improved patient assessment of pain, a lower complications rate, and shorter procedure time. In the group of patients randomized to treatment with conventional trocars, there were a total of six instrument-related adverse events (6/42): four cases (five incidences) of abdominal wall injuries and one small bowel perforation caused by a Veress needle. Of the 45 patients randomized to the blunt dilator/cannula treatment, there was one adverse event (1/45) that was unrelated to the blunt dilator/cannula system: Veress needle injury to abdominal vasculature. The radially expanding access system demonstrates statistically improved patient postoperative comfort and improved patient safety.     

Laparoscopic Entry Techniques in Obese Patient: Veress Needle,Direct Trocar Insertion or Open Entry Technique?

Laparoscopy is a common procedure in bariatric surgery. Serious complications can occur during laparoscopic entry as reported by Ahmad et al. (Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15:2, 2012). Several techniques, instruments, and approaches to minimize the risk of injury (the bowel, bladder, major abdominal vessels, and an anterior abdominal wall vessel) have been introduced. These methods include the standard technique of insufflation after insertion of the Veress needle, the open (Hasson technique), the direct trocar insertion, and optical trocar insertion. Furthermore, it is more difficult to perform in the obese patient, especially if the first trocar is not umbilical. This is because obese patients have a very thick abdominal wall (particularly in women) as well as a thick peritoneum. The aim of this article was to demonstrate the safety of various laparoscopic entry techniques in obese patient.     

Initial laparoscopic access using an optical trocar without pneumoperitoneum is safe and effective in the morbidly obese

Obtaining access to the peritoneal cavity in laparoscopic surgery is more difficult in morbidly obese people. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of accessing the peritoneal cavity using an optical, bladeless trocar without previous pneumoperitoneum in morbidly obese patients. The patients' characteristics and outcomes with consecutive and preferential use of an optical, bladeless, first trocar insertion without previous pneumoperitoneum in morbidly obese patients (body mass index > 35 kg/m2) was reviewed. A total of 208 morbidly obese patients were included. The trocar insertion technique was used in 196 patients. No bowel or major abdominal vessel injuries occurred. Ninety-eight patients (50%) had previous abdominal operations. Trocar-related injuries occurred in 3 patients: a superficial mesenteric laceration in 2 and a laceration of a greater omentum vessel in 1. The direct first trocar insertion technique provides safe entry into the peritoneal cavity in morbidly obese patients.     

Safe Veress needle insertion

Background/Purpose For laparoscopic surgery, the creation of pneumoperitoneum still remains a must. The insertion of a Veress needle or a trocar is never perfectly safe, and almost every kind of intraabdominal organ injury due to these insertions has been reported worldwide. Here, we describe a safe technique for creating pneumoperitoneum. Methods For the creation of pneumoperitoneum, under direct vision, the linea alba was elevated with two towel clips and then the Veress needle was inserted. We reviewed 368 patients operated on with this technique for complication rates. Ultrasound images were obtained before and during abdominal-wall lifting in 10 patients. Results There were no injuries due to the insertion of the Veress needle or trocars. In 90% of the patients, pneumoperitoneum was created successfully on the first attempt. Ultrasound examination demonstrated a mean extra safe area of 11.8 mm during abdominal-wall lifting with this technique. Conclusions Elevating the linea alba during Veress-needle insertion is safe.     

Laparoscopy in patients with prior surgery: results of the blind approach.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the complication rate due to blind access laparoscopy between patients with or without a prior history of laparotomy. METHODS: We examined a prospective record of data on laparoscopic surgeries performed from 1992 to 1998. Only cases in which the Veress needle and the first trocar were inserted through the umbilicus were included in this study. Results issued from patients without previous abdominal surgery (Group I) were compared with those arising from women with prior laparotomy (Group II). A statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test when appropriate. RESULTS: One thousand thirty-three laparoscopies were carried out during the study period, 881 of which began with a blind access through the umbilicus. Two hundred two women (19.3%) had an history of abdominal or pelvic surgery. Eight hundred forty-two patients were included in Group I and 39 in Group II. Failure to penetrate into the peritoneal cavity occurred significantly more frequently in Group II (4/39) than in Group I (1/842, P < 0.0001). The insertion of the Veress needle gave rise to 2 complications in Group I and 0 in Group II (P = 1.0). Transumbilical trocar insertion gave rise to 1 complication in each group (1/841 vs. 1/35, P = 0.11). When all events were considered, incidents or accidents were significantly more frequent in Group II (5/39) than in Group I (4/842)(P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We recorded a higher rate of incidents/complications due to the Veress needle and trocar insertion in patients with a previous history of laparotomy. An adapted approach should be recommended for these patients.     

Experience with the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in the performance of laparoscopic gastric bypass

Background In laparoscopic surgery, serious complications caused by the blind insertion of trocars are well known. The open technique is compromised by the leakage of carbon dioxide and can also be time consuming, especially in morbidly obese patients. Our aim was to determine whether the optical access trocar can be used to establish a safe and rapid entry during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Methods The data on a single surgeon’s experience with 370 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures during a 4-year period were reviewed. The Optiview trocar was used for all except the initial 21 patients. The entry time for the optical trocar was measured in 10 patients. Results Of the 370 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass from November 2000 to September 2004, the initial 21 were treated using the standard Veress needle to create the pneumoperitoneum. The next 22 were treated using the Veress needle to create the pneumoperitoneum, followed by insertion of the optical access trocar in the left upper quadrant as the initial trocar. From this point to the present, the optical access trocar has been inserted without the use of a Veress needle. There have been no trocar-related bowel or vascular injuries in the entire series. The mean optical trocar insertion time was 28 ± 1.2 s. Conclusions This is the first laparoscopic gastric bypass series to report the results of its experience with the optical access trocar. This device provides a safe and rapid technique for placement of the initial trocar for laparoscopic gastric bypass. Insertion of the optical trocar with a 10-mm laparoscope into the left upper quadrant is our procedure of choice for obtaining the pneumoperitoneum in this patient population.