Fluorouracil-alone versus high-dose folinic acid and fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC).

One hundred eighty-one patients with measurable recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer, who had not received prior chemotherapy, were randomized in a prospective controlled trial to receive 5-fluorouracil (5FU), 13.5 mg/kg, for five days (arm A) or high-dose folinic acid [Cyanamid-Lederle, Italy] (FA), 200 mg/m2, for five days and 5FU, 400 mg/m2 for five days (arm B). The treatments were repeated every four weeks. One hundred fifty-five patients were evaluable for response. The two arms were balanced for all potential prognostic factors studied. The response rate (CR+PR) was 18% in the 5FU arm and 16% in the 5FU plus FA arm. Median duration of response was 56 weeks for 5FU alone and 42 weeks for the combination (p = 0.48). Median time to failure (TTF) was 20 weeks for arm A and 21 for arm B (p = 0.62). Median survival was 62 weeks on the 5FU arm and 53 weeks on the FA plus 5FU arm (p = 0.14). Dose intensity (DI) delivered was the same in both arms. Diarrhea and mucositis were the most frequent adverse reactions in arm B; 20% of the patients in arm A and 38% of those in arm B experienced diarrhea (p = 0.008). Mucositis occurred in 34% of patients in arm A and 42% in arm B (p = 0.04). In general nausea and vomiting were moderate. Hematological toxicity was more severe in patients treated with 5FU alone: 31% in arm A and 14% in arm B developed leukopenia (p = 0.015). In the combination arm one patient died due to gastrointestinal and hematological toxicity after the seventh cycle. This study indicates that, in advanced colorectal cancer, the combination of high-dose FA and 5FU is not superior to 5FU alone when utilized at standard high-dose intensity.     

Folinic acid + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus equidose 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer. Phase III study of 'GISCAD' (Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer).

In a multicentre Phase III trial, 182 patients were randomized to either folinic acid (FA) (200 mg/sqm i.v. x 5 days) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (400 mg/sqm i.v. in 15' x 5 days) every 4 weeks (Arm A), or to 5-FU alone at the same dosage (Arm B). Response rates were 20.6% (Arm A) and 10% (Arm B) with a significant (p = 0.046) advantage for FA + 5-FU. Median time to progression (6 and 6 months) and overall survival (11.5 and 11 months) were similar in the 2 groups of patients, while neither treatment was effective in reducing pain or improving performance status. Univariate analysis showed that no prognostic factors other than treatment influenced response, although survival was affected by the number and site of metastases, performance status, and the presence and degree of pain. Toxicity was acceptable and lower in comparison with other Phase II-III trials, with no significant difference between the 2 arms. However, in individual patients, grade 3-4 side effects (mainly stomatitis and diarrhoea) were observed, particularly in patients receiving FA: this led to interruption of the treatment in 7 cases. The superiority, in terms of objective response, of FA + 5-FU over 5-FU alone would seem to justify a large-scale evaluation of this combination in the adjuvant setting. Further improvements in relation to advanced disease (i.e., modifications to the schedule and/or introduction of other modulators) are warranted.     

吉西他滨单药或与顺铂联合治疗胰腺癌的临床疗效评价

目的 评价吉西他滨单药以及与顺铂联合治疗局部晚期或转移性胰腺炎的疗效。临床受益反应,生存时间和毒性反应。方法 42例患者随机分为吉西他滨单药组（A组20例）和吉西他滨 顺铂联合组（B组22例）,A组;吉西他滨1000mg/m^2,每周1次,连用7周,休息1周;随后相同剂量每周1次,连用3周,休息1周,B组;吉西他滨1000mg/m^2,每周1次,连用3周,顺铂60mg/m^2,第15天给药,休息1周,每4周重复,边境用药3个周期。结果 42例患者中,可评价客观疗效者34例（A组16例,B组18例,可评价临床受益反应（CBR）者36例（A组16例,B组20例）,可进行毒性反应评估者40例（A组19例,B组21例）,A组：PR1例（6.3%)。MR4例（25.0%),SD7例（43.8%)。PD4例（25.0%)。B组;PR2例（11.0%)。MR3例（16.7%),SD8例（44.4%),PD5例（27.8%)。PR MR SD率A组为75.0%。B组为72.2%。CBR有效率A组为87.5%(14/16),B组为70.0%(14/20)。两组3个月生存率均为100%,6个月生存率分别为81.3%和61.6%。12个月生存率分别为31.3%和11.1%。B组Ⅲ、Ⅳ度血液学毒性反应发生率略高于A组,两组相比,差异无显著性。结论 吉西他滨单药以及与顺铂联合一线治疗局部晚期或转移性胰腺癌有一定的客观疗效。可明显改善患者的生活质量。延长了生存时间,患者耐受良好。     

Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell'Italia Meridionale

BACKGROUND: A prospective, randomized Phase III trial was performed to determine whether, compared with gemcitabine (GEM) alone, the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to GEM was able to improve the time to disease progression and the clinical benefit rate in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate, overall survival rate, and toxicity patterns of patients in the two treatment arms were evaluated as secondary end points. METHODS: Patients with measurable, locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized to receive GEM (Arm A) or a combination of GEM and CDDP (Arm B). In Arm A, a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) GEM per week was administered for 7 consecutive weeks, and, after a 2-week rest, treatment was resumed on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for 2 cycles. In Arm B, CDDP was given at a dose of 25 mg/m(2) per week 1 hour before GEM at the same dose that was used in Arm A. On Day 22, only GEM was administered. Patients were restaged after the first 7 weeks of therapy and then again after the other 2 cycles. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients entered the trial: Fifty-four patients were randomized to Arm A, and 53 patients were randomized to Arm B. The median time to disease progression was 8 weeks in Arm A and 20 weeks in Arm B; this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.048). In Arm A, one complete response and four partial responses were recorded on the basis of an intent-to-treat analysis, with an overall response rate of 9.2% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3-20%). In Arm B, there were no complete responses, whereas 14 partial responses were achieved, with an overall response rate of 26.4% (95%CI, 15-40%). This difference in the overall response rates was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The tumor growth control rate (i.e., total number of patients who achieved complete responses, partial responses, and stable disease) was 42.6% (95%CI, 29-57%) in Arm A and 56.6% (95%CI, 42-70%) in Arm B. A clinical benefit was observed in 21 of 43 patients (49%) in Arm A and in 20 of 38 patients (52.6%) in Arm B without any significant difference. The median overall survival was 20 weeks for patients in Arm A and 30 weeks for patients in Arm B (P = 0.43). Toxicity was mild in both treatment arms, with no significant differences between the two groups except for the statistically higher incidence of Grade 1-2 asthenia in Arm B (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of CDDP to GEM significantly improved the median time to disease progression and the overall response rate compared with GEM alone. The clinical benefit rate was similar in both arms, whereas the median overall survival rate was more favorable for Arm B, although the difference did not attain statistical significance. The authors conclude that the combination of CDDP and GEM currently may be considered as an optimal treatment for patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.     

奥沙利铂单药或与氟尿嘧啶-甲酰四氢叶酸联合应用治疗晚期大肠癌Ⅱ期临床试用报告

目的：观察奥沙利铂治疗晚期大肠癌的临床疗效和安全性。方法：根据ＧＣＰ指导原则开展多中心Ⅱ期随机临床研究：Ａ组奥沙利铂单药１３０ｍｇ／ｍ２静脉滴注２ｈ,每３周一次;Ｂ组奥沙利铂１３０ｍｇ／ｍ２静脉滴注２ｈＤ１,加甲酰四氢叶酸钙（ＣＦ）２００ｍｇ／ｍ２＋５氟尿嘧啶３００ｍｇ／ｍ２静脉滴注４ｈＤ１到Ｄ５,每３周一次。治疗３周期后评定疗效,有效病例在４周后确认疗效。结果：共收入１１４例,在可统计近期疗效的１００例中,ＣＲ１例,ＰＲ２６例,ＳＤ３２例,ＰＤ４１例,总有效率２７０％。Ａ组３６例单药治疗有效率为１３９％;Ｂ组６４例有效率为３４４％。不良反应主要为恶心、呕吐、贫血和感觉神经毒性。对白细胞和血小板影响较小。结论：经考核奥沙利铂对大肠癌疗效和不良反应与欧洲的结果相近,和氟尿嘧啶合用疗效突出;多数病人耐受良好,是一治疗大肠癌有希望的新药。进一步考核,奥沙利铂和氟尿嘧啶联合有望成为治疗晚期大肠癌的首选方法。     

Weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a phase II study of the EORTC GastroIntestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group

The aim of the study was to assess the response rate and toxicity of high-dose 24 h infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Patients with measurable disease, performance status 0-2, and no prior chemotherapy were registered to receive cycles of leucovorin (LV) 500 mg/m2 (or l-LV 250 mg/m2 over 1 h followed by 5FU 2.6 g/m2 over 24 h, weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. The main endpoints were the response rate and toxicity. From 37 patients, 36 were the analysed for toxicity, and 33 were eligible and analysed for response. The median age was 59 years (range 28-74 years), and the median performance status was 1. Partial response was observed in three patients (9%) (95% Confidential Interval (CI): [2-24]%). Main grade 3/4 National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria toxicities (patients) were diarrhoea (n = 3), vomiting (n = 2) and hand-foot syndrome (n = 5). Median time to progression was 7 weeks (95% CI: [6.4-11.7] weeks) and median survival 19 weeks (95% CI: [12-35] weeks). In conclusion, high-dose 5FU and folinic acid is well tolerated, but has only modest activity in pancreatic cancer.     

国产奥沙利铂治疗晚期大肠癌临床验证研究

 目的　评价国产奥沙利铂治疗晚期大肠癌的疗效和安全性。方法　将 78例大肠癌患者随机分为 A、B两组。 A组为奥沙利铂试验组 ,B组为顺铂对照组 ,治疗 2周后评价疗效 ,有效病例在 4周后确认疗效。结果　共入组 78例 ,可评价病例 74例中 ,A组有效率为 2 8.9% ,B组有效率为 5 .5 6 % (P<0 .0 1 )。不良反应主要为恶心、呕吐和感觉神经毒性。结论　国产奥沙利铂联合氟脲嘧啶 -甲酰四氢叶酸钙治疗晚期大肠癌疗效与同方案进口奥沙利铂疗效基本相近 ,比以顺铂为主的对照组方案疗效要高 (P<0 .0 1 ).     

Randomised phase II study of standard versus chronomodulated CPT-11 plus chronomodulated 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in advanced colorectal cancer patients

In this study, a randomised phase II trial explored the effects of 6-h chronomodulated CPT-11 infusion in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Sixty-eight pre-treated patients were randomly assigned to CPT-11 administered at 180 mg/m2 on day 1, by 1-h infusion (Arm A) or 6-h sinusoidal infusion with peak timing at 5:00 a.m. (Arm B). All patients also received chronomodulated folinic acid/5-fluorouracil (FA/5-FU). Patients in Arm B obtained a 25.7% response rate for 7.0 months duration, a progression-free survival for 8.0 months and a median survival of 28 months. The same data in Arm A were 18.2%, 4.5, 6.0 and 18 months, respectively. No differences in drugs dose-intensity or increased toxicity with prolonged chronomodulated infusion were detected. Major grade 3-4 toxicity was diarrhoea: 10 patients in Arm A and 13 in Arm B. In conclusion, this study has shown that chronomodulated infusion of CPT-11 and FA/5-FU is safe, active and can be integrated with oxaliplatin (EORTC 05011) for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.     

Phase I trial of oxaliplatin with fluorouracil, folinic acid and concurrent radiotherapy for oesophageal cancer

This dose escalation study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended doses (RDs) of 5-fluorouracil (5FU), folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) with concomitant radiotherapy in inoperable/metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. Patients received three courses of LV5FU2 regimen (folinic acid 200 mg m(-2), bolus 5FU 300-400 mg/m(2), continuous infusion 5FU 400-600 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 2) and escalating doses of oxaliplatin 50 to 100 mg m(-2) on day 1 (FOLFOX). This regimen was repeated every 2 weeks, concomitant to a 50-gray radiotherapy per 5 weeks. Three more cycles were delivered after completion of radiation therapy. Three to six patients were allocated to each of the five dose levels until MTD was reached. Thirty-three patients were enroled and 21 had metastatic disease. Maximum tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 100 mg m(-2), and continuous infusion 5FU was 600 mg m(-2) day(-) (level 5). The most common toxicities were neutropenia, dysphagia and oesophagitis. The RDs were those of FOLFOX-4 regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg m(-2) and full doses of LV5FU2). The overall response was 48.5%, including 12% complete response. Response rate on primary tumour was 62.9%. This FOLFOX-4 regimen was reasonably well tolerated and effective in inoperable/metastatic oesophageal carcinoma and warrants additional investigation.     

A phase II randomized trial of induction chemotherapy versus no induction chemotherapy followed by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal cancer

BackgroundThe contribution of induction chemotherapy (IC) before preoperative chemoradiation for esophageal cancer (EC) is not known. We hypothesized that IC would increase the rate of pathologic complete response (pathCR).MethodsTrimodality-eligibile patients were randomized to receive no IC (Arm A) or IC (oxaliplatin/FU; Arm B) before oxaliplatin/FU/radiation. Surgery was attempted ∼5–6 weeks after chemoradiation. The pathCR rate, post-surgery 30-day mortality, overall survival (OS), and toxic effects were assessed. Bayesian methods and Fisher's exact test were used.ResultsOne hundred twenty-six patients were randomized dynamically to balance the two arms for histology, baseline stage, gender, race, and age. Fifty-five patients in Arm A and 54 in Arm B underwent surgery. The median actuarial OS for all patients (54 deaths) was 45.62 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 27.63–NA], with median OS 45.62 months (95% CI 25.56–NA) in Arm A and 43.68 months (95% CI 27.63–NA) in Arm B (P = 0.69). The pathCR rate in Arm A was 13% (7 of 55) and 26% (14 of 54) in Arm B (two-sided Fisher's exact test, P = 0.094). Safety was similar in both arms.ConclusionsThese data suggest that IC produces non-significant increase in the pathCR rate and does not prolong OS. Further development of IC before chemoradiation may not be beneficial.Clinical trial no.: NCT 00525915 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).     

5-Fluorouracil with folinic acid is not effective against metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung

Thirty patients with a diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung were entered on a trial to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of 5-fluorouracil 370 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every four weeks in combination with folinic acid 200 mg/m2, 60 min prior to 5FU. All patients had a good performance status, bidimensionally measurable disease, and weight loss less than or equal to 5% of preillness weight. Of the 29 evaluable patients, only two (7%) had partial responses (95% confidence limits 1-24%). Eleven (38%) had stable disease and 16 (55%) progressed. The two responding patients survived 12 and 60+ weeks. The median survival of all evaluable patients was 25 weeks (range 7-60+) and that of the stable patients was 26 weeks. The principal toxicities observed were diarrhea and stomatitis. Myelosuppression was rarely dose limiting. In contrast to the results of treatment with 5FU and folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer and breast cancer, the results of treatment with this combination of agents have been much less encouraging in adenocarcinoma of the lung.     

5-Fluorouracil with Folinic Acid is Not Effective Against Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Lung

Thirty patients with a diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung were entered on a trial to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of 5-fluorouracil 370 mg/m² daily for 5 days every four weeks in combination with folinic acid 200 mg/m², 60 mm prior to 5FU. All patients had a good performance status, bidimensionally measurable disease, and weight loss ≤5% of preillness weight. Of the 29 evaluable patients, only two (7%) had partial responses (95% confidence limits 1-24%). Eleven (38%) had stable disease and 16 (55%) progressed. The two responding patients survived 12 and 60+ weeks. The median survival of all evaluable patients was 25 weeks (range 7-60+) and that of the stable patients was 26 weeks. The principal toxicities observed were diarrhea and stomatitis. Myelosuppression was rarely dose limiting. In contrast to the results of treatment with 5FU and folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer and breast cancer, the results of treatment with this combination of agents have been much less encouraging in adenocarcinoma of the lung.     

奥沙利铂联合氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙治疗晚期大肠癌

目的：研究奥沙利铂、氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙联合治疗晚期大肠癌的疗效和毒性反应，并将该方案和氟尿嘧啶与亚叶酸钙联合治疗方案相比较。方法：经病理确诊的晚期大肠癌83例分为以下两组：治疗组行奥沙利铂(oxalipatin)130mg／m^2静脉滴注，第1天给药：氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)425mg／m^2静脉滴注，第1-5天给药；亚叶酸钙(CF)100mg／m^2静脉滴注，第1～5天给药；每3周重复。对照组行氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)42h5mg／m^2静脉滴注,第1～5天给药；亚叶酸钙(CF)100mg／m^2。静脉滴注，第1-5天给药；每3周重复。每例患者至少完成两个周期。结果：治疗组有效率为46．5％，常见的毒性反应为神经毒性；对照组有效率为17．5％，与治疗组差别有统计学意义，未见神经毒性，其他毒性与治疗组无统计学差异。结论：奥沙利铂联合氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙治疗晚期大肠癌,患者对其耐受良好，毒副反应较轻，疗效高于氟尿嘧啶加亚叶酸钙方案。     

CPT-11联合5-FU/FA方案治疗局部晚期或转移性结直肠癌的临床研究

目的评价CPT-11(开普拓)联合5-FU/FA治疗局部晚期或转移性结直肠癌的临床疗效及不良反应.方法符合收治标准者19例,可评价疗效者17例,入组Arm A方案8例,Arm B方案9例,ArmA方案:CPT-11270mg/m2静滴d1;FA200mg/m2,5-FU 425mg/m2分别静滴,均d1～5,每3周重复,两次CPT-11(6周)评价疗效.ArmB方案:CPT-11 180mg/m2静滴d1,LA200mg/m2,静滴d1～2,5-FU 400mg/m2静推,然后5-FU 600mg/m2,d1～2,每2周重复,应用3次CPT-11(6周)为一个周期.结果17例患者,CR 1例,PR 5例,SD 9例,PD 2例,总缓解率35%,稳定率52.9%,中位缓解时间7.5个月,中位稳定时间5个月.主要剂量限制毒性为迟发性腹泻及中性粒细胞减少.结论CPT-11联合5-FU/FA两种方案治疗局部晚期或转移性结直肠癌有较高的疾病缓解率和稳定率,主要剂量限制毒性为迟发性腹泻及中性粒细胞减少.     

Second-line chemotherapy with a hybrid-alternating regimen of bolus 5FU modulated by methotrexate and infusional 5FU modulated by folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer pretreated with 5FU. A phase 2 study

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In vitro, methotrexate (MTX) is the best modulator for bolus 5-fluorouracil (5FU), whereas folinic acid (FA) is the best for continuous infusion. We evaluated the effect of 5FU modulated by both MTX (bolus administration) and FA (continuous infusion) as second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Entry criteria were: at least one 5FU-based chemotherapy regimen as first-line treatment for metastatic disease, or progression within twelve months after 5FU-containing adjuvant therapy. Treatment schedule: MTX 200 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 15; 5FU 600 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, days 2 and 16; 5FU 200 mg/m2 i.v. continuous infusion for 21 days, starting on day 29; FA 20 mg/m2 i.v. bolus weekly during the three weeks of 5FU infusion. Cycles were repeated every 56 days. The primary end-point was tumour control rate, including partial responses and stabilizations. RESULTS: 34/35 patients enrolled were evaluable for response. Five (14.7%) had a partial response, 13 (38.2%) disease stabilization, and 16 (47.1%) progressed; tumour control rate was 52.9%. Median TTP was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.03-7.83); 29 patients had died. Median OAS was 15.9 months (95% CI 8.8-21.9). Toxicity was mild. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen constituted by 5FU modulated by MTX (bolus administration) and FA (continuous infusion) is active as second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.     

5-Fluorouracil,High-Dose Folinic Acid and Mitomycin C Combination Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of secondline continuous 5-fluorouracil (5FU) chemotherapy combined with folinic acid and mitomycin C in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who progressed on first-line chemotherapy.

From June 1992 to April 1994, 24 consecutive patients, median age 59.7 years (range 41 - 73), performance status (PS) 0 to 2, were treated as secondline chemotherapy with mitomycin C, 7 mg/m² every 4 weeks, folinic acid 200 mg/m²/day as a 2h infusion followed by 400 mg/m² of 5FU bolus and 600 mg/m² continuous 5FU infusion for 22h on days 1 and 2 and every 14 days; 19 patients did not respond to folinic acid and 5FU bolus regimen (in 2 patients, this was associated with pirarubicin in a continuous hepatic artery infusion) and 3 did not respond to irinotecan; 2 patients had disease progression during adjuvant chemotherapy with folinic acid and 5FU bolus. Tumor response was assessed every 12 weeks.

One patient died before evaluation and 1 was lost to follow-up after 3 cycles; 7/24 patients had an objective response (29.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 11.0-47.4) including 2 complete responses; 7 additional patients had stable disease or minor response. Mean duration of response was 7.5 months. Median survival was 10 months and survival at 1 year was 39.4% (95% CI: 4- 59.4). One patient who had a disease progression under irinotecan presented an objective response. No iatrogenic deaths occurred, nor was any grade 3 or 4 myelotoxicity seen. No hand-foot syndrome nor any cardiotoxicity arose but 2 grade II alopecia were seen. Digestive toxicities were the most frequent but with only 4 grade III toxicities (1 vomiting, 1 mucositis and 2 diarrhea) and no grade IV.

With nearly 30% objective response and acceptable toxicity this treatment seems to offer a good alternative in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancers after the failure of first-line chemotherapy.     

Modulation of 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in colorectal cancer: the IGCS-COL multicentre, randomised, phase III study

The aims of this multicentre, randomised phase III trial were to evaluate: (1) the role of levamisol (LEV); and (2) the role of folinic acid (FA), added to 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. Patients with histologically proven, radically resected stage II or III colon or rectal cancer were eligible. The study had a 2x2 factorial design with four treatment arms: (a) 5FU alone, (b) 5FU+LEV, (c) 5FU+FA, (d) 5FU+LEV+FA, and two planned comparisons, testing the role of LEV and of FA, respectively. From March 1991, to September 1998, 1327 patients were randomised. None of the two comparisons resulted in a significant disease-free (DFS) or overall (OAS) survival advantage. The hazard ratio (HR) of relapse was 0.89 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.73-1.09) for patients receiving FA and 0.99 (95% CI 0.80-1.21) for those receiving LEV; corresponding HRs of death were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.80-1.30) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.73-1.20). Nonhaematological toxicity (all grade vomiting, diarrhoea, mucositis, congiuntivitis, skin, fever and fatigue) was significantly worse with FA, while all other toxicities were similar. In the present trial, there was no evidence that the addition of FA or LEV significantly prolongs DFS and OAS of radically resected colorectal cancer patients.     

A randomized phase III multicenter trial comparing irinotecan in combination with the Nordic bolus 5-FU and folinic acid schedule or the bolus/infused de Gramont schedule (Lv5FU2) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: To compare irinotecan with the Nordic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) bolus schedule [irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1, 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) and FA 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 2 (FLIRI)] or the Lv5FU2 schedule [irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1, FA 200 mg/m(2), 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) and infused 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 2 (Lv5FU2-IRI)] due to uncertainties about how to administrate 5-FU with irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 567) with metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive FLIRI or Lv5FU2-IRI. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well balanced. PFS did not differ between groups (median 9 months, P = 0.22). Overall survival (OS) was also similar (median 19 months, P = 0.9). Fewer objective responses were seen in the FLIRI group (35% versus 49%, P = 0.001) but the metastatic resection rate did not differ (4% versus 6%, P = 0.3). Grade 3/4 neutropenia (11% versus 5%, P = 0.01) and grade 2 alopecia (18% versus 9%, P = 0.002) were more common in the FLIRI group. The 60-day mortality was 2.4% versus 2.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan with the bolus Nordic schedule (FLIRI) is a convenient treatment with PFS and OS comparable to irinotecan with the Lv5FU2 schedule. Neutropenia and alopecia are more prevalent, but both regimens are equally well tolerated.     

No benefit of adjuvant Fluorouracil Leucovorin chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cancer of the rectum (LARC): Long term results of a randomized trial (I-CNR-RT)

Background and purposeTo evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACT-RT). The study was funded by the Italian National Research Council (CNR).MethodsFrom September 1992 to January 2001, 655 patients with LARC (clinically T3–4, any N) treated with NACT-RT and surgery, were randomized in two arms: follow-up (Arm A) or 6 cycles of ACT with 5 fluorouracil (5FU)-Folinic Acid (Arm B). NACT-RT consisted of 45 Gy/28/ff concurrent with 5FU (350 mg/sqm) and Folinic Acid (20 mg/sqm) on days 1–5 and 29–33; surgery was performed after 4–6 weeks. Median follow up was 63·7 months. Primary end point was overall survival (OS).Results634/655 patients were evaluable (Arm A 310, Arm B 324); 92·5% of Arm A and 91% of Arm B patients received the preoperative treatment as in the protocol; 294 patients of Arm A (94·8%) and 296 of Arm B (91·3%) underwent a radical resection; complete pathologic response and overall downstaging rates did not show any significant difference in the two arms. 83/297 (28%) patients in Arm B, never started ACT. Five year OS and DFS did not show any significant difference in the two treatment arms. Distant metastases occurred in 62 patients (21%) in Arm A and in 58 (19·6%) in Arm B.ConclusionsIn patients with LARC treated with NACT-RT, the addition of ACT did not improve 5 year OS and DFS and had no impact on the distant metastasis rate.     

Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA)

BackgroundPertuzumab (P) combined with trastuzumab (H)-based chemotherapy improves efficacy in early and advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. We assessed the tolerability, with particular focus on cardiac safety, of H and P with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer.Patients and methodsIn this multicenter, open-label phase II study, patients with operable, locally advanced, or inflammatory breast cancer were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive six neoadjuvant cycles q3w (Arm A: 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide [FEC] + H + P ×3 → docetaxel [T] + H + P ×3; Arm B: FEC ×3 → T + H + P ×3; Arm C: T + carboplatin + H [TCH]+P ×6). pCR was assessed at surgery and adjuvant therapy given to complete 1 year of H.ResultsTwo hundred twenty-five patients were randomized. During neoadjuvant treatment, two patients (2.7%; Arm B) experienced symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and 11 patients (Arm A: 4 [5.6%]; Arm B: 4 [5.3%]; Arm C: 3 [3.9%]) had declines in left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥10% points from baseline to <50%. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event. pCR (ypT0/is) was reported for 61.6% (Arm A), 57.3% (Arm B), and 66.2% (Arm C) of patients.ConclusionThe combination of P with H and standard chemotherapy resulted in low rates of symptomatic LVSD.