Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice

BACKGROUND: Two of the most widely used mouse strains for studying the behavioral effects of ethanol are C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mice. These strains exhibit marked differences in behavioral and physiological responses to ethanol. The subjective discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol may play a role in ethanol abuse, but the discriminative stimulus profile of ethanol has not been compared in B6 and D2 mice. Examination of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in B6 and D2 mouse strains may enhance our understanding of the relationship between the subjective effects of ethanol and other ethanol-induced behavioral effects. METHODS: Twelve adult male C57BL/6J mice and 12 male DBA/2J mice were trained to discriminate 1.5 g/kg ethanol from saline in daily 15 min, milk-reinforced operant sessions. After training, ethanol substitution and response-rate suppression dose response curves were determined for ethanol, midazolam, diazepam, pentobarbital, pregnanolone, 4,5,6,7-Tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (THIP), dizocilpine, and morphine. RESULTS: D2 mice learned the ethanol discrimination significantly more quickly than did B6 mice. Ethanol, midazolam, pregnanolone, and dizocilpine fully substituted for ethanol in both strains. Pentobarbital was more potent in producing ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects in D2 than B6 mice. Midazolam and diazepam were significantly more potent in suppressing response rates in D2 than B6 mice. Morphine failed to substitute for ethanol in either strain, but the ED50 for morphine suppression of responding was significantly lower in B6 than D2 mice. CONCLUSIONS: The initial stimulus effects of 1.5 g/kg ethanol may be more salient in D2 than B6 mice. This does not appear to result from differences in the neurotransmitter systems that mediate ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects. In both strains, gamma-aminobutyric acid-positive modulators and a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist substituted for ethanol. However, strain differences did exist in the potency of gamma-aminobutyric acid-positive modulators and morphine for suppressing operant responding.     

Differential neurosensitivity to the discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol in C57BL/6J and C3H/He mice

BACKGROUND: A large body of evidence suggests that the interoceptive cue associated with ethanol intoxication is complex and dependent on a number of environmental and biological factors. Despite the fact that mice have been widely used to study genetic influences on sensitivity to various actions of ethanol, few studies have used mice to examine sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in two inbred mouse strains, namely C57BL/6J and C3H/He mice. METHODS: Adult male C57BL/6J and C3H/He mice were trained to discriminate between ethanol and saline using a two-lever food reinforcement operant procedure. Once criterion discrimination performance was achieved, dose-response functions were determined from generalization tests. Additional experiments were conducted to determine whether differences in discrimination performance were related to differential blood/brain ethanol levels in the two mouse strains. RESULTS: A greater proportion of C57BL/6J mice acquired the discrimination and required fewer trials to achieve criterion performance compared with C3H/He mice with a 1.0 g/kg ethanol training dose. This deficit in acquisition was overcome when the training dose was increased to 2.0 g/kg for C3H/He mice. In a second experiment, a 1.5 g/kg training dose of ethanol was used for both strains. Again, a greater proportion of C57BL/6J mice acquired the discrimination and required fewer training trials to achieve criterion performance compared with C3H/He mice. Blood ethanol levels did not differ between the strains after administration of the 1.5 g/kg training dose. However, blood and brain ethanol levels did differ between the strains after doses of ethanol were administered that produced equivalent discrimination performance. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that ethanol discrimination was more readily acquired and maintained in C57BL/6J mice than C3H/He mice. Ethanol dose-response functions generated from generalization tests also clearly demonstrated greater sensitivity to the discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol in C57BL/6J mice compared with the C3H/He strain. This differential sensitivity to the interoceptive cue produced by ethanol does not seem to be related to learning or pharmacokinetic differences between the two inbred strains.     

Dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice differ in sensitivity to ethanol excitation

BACKGROUND: The mesolimbic dopamine pathway that originates in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) is important for the rewarding effects of ethanol. Ethanol has been shown to excite dopaminergic neurons of the VTA, both in vivo and in vitro, in rats. Behavioral differences in the rewarding effects of ethanol have been observed between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. The present electrophysiological study examined the effect of ethanol on individual dopaminergic VTA neurons from these two inbred mouse strains. METHODS: Extracellular single unit recordings of spontaneous action potentials were made from dopaminergic VTA neurons in brain slices from either C57BL/6J or DBA/2J mice. Ethanol (10 to 160 mM) was administered in the superfusate and the mean change in firing rate produced by ethanol was measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in basal spontaneous firing rate of dopaminergic VTA neurons between these two mouse strains. Ethanol caused a concentration-dependent increase in the firing rate of neurons from both mouse strains. Ethanol excited dopaminergic VTA neurons from DBA/2J mice more potently than those from C57BL/6J mice. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in sensitivity to ethanol excitation of dopaminergic VTA neurons in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice may contribute to differences in their behavioral response to ethanol. The fact that a given concentration of ethanol causes greater excitation of dopaminergic VTA (reward) neurons in DBA/2J mice than in C57BL/6J mice could explain why DBA/2J mice show much stronger place preference conditioning with ethanol. The higher voluntary intake of ethanol by C57BL/6J mice may be partly due to the insensitivity of their dopaminergic VTA neurons that requires them to drink a lot of ethanol to achieve sufficient excitation of reward neurons, whereas DBA/2J mice avoid oral ingestion of ethanol, despite its rewarding effect, because of their aversion to its taste.     

Adolescent C57BL/6J (but not DBA/2J) Mice Consume Greater Amounts of Limited‐Access Ethanol Compared to Adults and Display Continued Elevated Ethanol Intake into Adulthood

Background: Alcohol use is common during the adolescent period, a time at which a number of crucial neurobiological, hormonal, and behavioral changes occur ( Spear, 2000 ). In order to more fully understand the complex interaction between alcohol use and these age‐typical neurobiological changes, animal models must be utilized. Rodents experience a developmental period similar to that of adolescence. Although rat models have shown striking adolescent‐specific differences in sensitivity to ethanol, little work has been done in mice despite the fact that the C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA2/J (D2) mice have been shown to markedly differ in ethanol preference drinking and exhibit widely different sensitivities to ethanol. Methods: The current study examined ethanol intake in adolescent and adult B6 and D2 mice using a limited access alcohol exposure paradigm called Drinking in the Dark (DID). Additionally, the effect of adolescent (or adult) ethanol exposure on subsequent adult ethanol intake was examined by re‐exposing the mice to the same paradigm once the adolescents reached adulthood. We hypothesized that adolescent (P25–45) mice would exhibit greater binge‐like alcohol intake compared to adults (P60–80), and that B6 mice would exhibit greater binge‐like alcohol intake compared to D2 mice. Moreover, we predicted that relative difference in binge‐like alcohol intake between adolescents and adults would be greater in D2 mice. Results: Adolescent B6 mice consumed more ethanol than adults in the DID model. There was no difference between adolescent and adult D2 mice. Conclusions: This work adds to the literature suggesting that adolescents will consume more ethanol than adults and that this exposure can result in altered adult intake. However, this effect seems largely dependent upon genotype. Future work will continue to examine age‐related differences in ethanol intake, preference, and sensitivity in inbred mouse strains.     

Intravenous Self-Administration of Ethanol in β-Endorphin-Deficient Mice

Extensive research on both human alcoholics and in animal models of alcoholism has implicated the release of endogenous opioids in the consumption of ethanol. Various experiments using opioid antagonists have indicated that these drugs cause both humans and animals to decrease their consumption of ethanol. However, it remains unclear exactly which of the endogenous opioids mediates the rewarding effects of ethanol. The present experiment used intravenous self-administration of ethanol to determine whether β -endorphin (BE)-deficient mice differed from wild-type (WT) mice in ethanol self-administration. The BE-deficient mice completely lack BE, but are otherwise similar to the WT mice. By using intravenous self-administration, we were able to rule out any ability of BE to mediate differences in ethanol consumption via palatability factors alone. Both types of mice were 7 generations backcrossed onto a C57BL/6J inbred strain background. During nine daily, 2-hr free-operant sessions, 14 BE-deficient and 17 WT mice could nosepoke for 75 mg/kg ethanol infusions delivered intravenously on an fixed-ratio 3 schedule with a 2-sec time-out after each reinforcer delivery. Reinforcer delivery occurred following nosepokes in only one of two holes. Contrary to what was expected, BE-deficient mice acquired selective operant responding for ethanol, whereas WT mice did not. Although the two genotypes did not differ in either operant or locomotor behavior during the first session, by the end of the nine sessions, BE deficient mice were reliably nosepoking for ethanol, whereas WT mice were not. These findings may indicate that BE is not essential for the postingestive reinforcing effects of ethanol in these animals.     

Role of Potassium Channel Gene Kcnj10 in Ethanol Preference in C57bl/6J and DBA/2J Mice

Background: Inwardly‐rectifying potassium channel protein Kir4.1 is encoded by Kcnj10 which maps to a quantitative trait locus on chromosome 1 for the voluntary alcohol consumption phenotype in mice. Kcnj10 brain expression differences have been established between ethanol‐preferring C57Bl/6J and ethanol‐avoiding BALB/cJ mice, but its differential expression in other tissues and strains have largely been overlooked. A nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphism exists between C57Bl/6J and ethanol‐avoiding DBA/2J mice which changes amino acid 262 from threonine (C57Bl/6J) to serine (DBA/2J). This Kcnj10 SNP and its expression may serve as valuable markers in predicting the ethanol preference phenotype in mice. Methods: The evolutionary divergence of the Kir gene family was characterized using phylogenetic analysis involving the 16 mouse Kir channels. Kcnj10 expression differences in the brain, liver, lung, heart, spleen, kidney, testes, and muscle of male C57Bl/6J and DBA/2J mice at different developmental stages were examined using semiquantitative RT‐PCR analysis. A SNP analysis was conducted to assess the association of Kcnj10 Thr262Ser SNP and the ethanol preference phenotype in F2 mice derived from the reciprocal crosses of the C57Bl/6J and DBA/2J strains. Results: Evolutionary analysis supports gene duplication and genetic recombination as likely sources of diversity within the Kir gene family. Semiquantitative RT‐PCR analysis revealed significantly higher Kcnj10 expression in the brain, spleen, and kidney of both strains when compared to other tissues from the same strain. There were no significant differences in tissue‐specific mRNA levels between strains except in the testes. Genotype distributions of the Kcnj10 Thr262Ser SNP were different between low‐ and high‐drinkers. A significant difference in the average ethanol preference level of each genotype was also observed. Conclusion: Our results suggest a role for Kcnj10 in ethanol preference determination in mice. However, further experiments are needed to establish if this association is due to the nonsynonymous SNP or other additional factors associated with Kcnj10.     

Role of genotype in the development of locomotor sensitization to alcohol in adult and adolescent mice: comparison of the DBA/2J and C57BL/6J inbred mouse strains

Background: Animal models that explore differential sensitivity to the effects of acute and repeated exposure of alcohol (ethanol) may be influenced by both the developmental and genetic profile of the population. Therefore, we sought to compare the influence of ontogeny on sensitivity to ethanol‐induced locomotor stimulation and on the induction of locomotor sensitization to this effect across 2 inbred strains of mice; the ethanol consuming C57BL/6J and the ethanol avoiding DBA/2J strains. Methods: C57BL/6J and DBA/2J adults (postnatal day [PD] 60 to 80) and adolescents (PD 30 ± 2) were assessed for basal activity, acute response to 2.0 g/kg ethanol, and the expression of locomotor sensitization following repeated administration of 2.5, 3.0, or 3.5 g/kg ethanol. Results: Basal activity was different across development for the C57BL/6J, but not DBA/2J, with adult B6 mice showing persistently greater baseline activity. Adolescents of both strains were more sensitive than adults to acute ethanol‐induced locomotor stimulation; adults exhibited a decrease in their acute response across the testing session. Adolescent DBA/2J mice developed less ethanol sensitization compared to adults, with significant sensitization observed only following repeated administration of the lowest ethanol dose (2.5 g/kg), whereas DBA/2J adults sensitized to all doses. Age did not influence the development of ethanol sensitization for the C57BL/6J strain, as both adults and adolescents displayed a sensitized response following all ethanol doses. Conclusions: These results suggest that the developmental pattern of locomotor sensitivity to ethanol is unique to the genotypic profile of the animal model.     

Ethanol preference is inversely correlated with ethanol-induced dopamine release in 2 substrains of C57BL/6 mice

BACKGROUND: The C57BL/6 mouse model has been used extensively in alcohol drinking studies, yet significant differences in ethanol preference between substrains exist. Differences in ethanol-induced dopamine release in the ventral striatum could contribute to this variability in drinking behavior as dopamine has been implicated in the reinforcing properties of ethanol. METHODS: A 2-bottle choice experiment investigated the difference in ethanol preference between C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NCrl animals. Microdialysis was used to determine dopamine release and ethanol clearance in these 2 substrains after intraperitoneal injections of 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 g/kg ethanol or saline. RESULTS: C57BL/6J mice exhibited significantly greater ethanol preference and less ethanol-stimulated dopamine release compared with C57BL/6NCrl mice. The intraperitoneal injections of ethanol caused a significant increase in dopamine in both substrains at all 3 doses with significant differences between substrains at the 2 highest alcohol doses. Saline injections had a significant effect on dopamine release when given in a volume equivalent to the 3 g/kg ethanol dose. Ethanol pharmacokinetics were similar in the 2 substrains at all 3 doses. CONCLUSIONS: Ethanol-induced dopamine release in the ventral striatum may contribute to the differences in alcohol preference between C57BL/6J and C57BL/6NCrl mice.     

Topiramate does not affect the acquisition or expression of ethanol conditioned place preference in DBA/2J or C57BL/6J mice

BACKGROUND: Topiramate, an anticonvulsant, has been reported to increase the number of abstinent days and decrease craving in alcohol-dependent individuals. However, the neurobiological basis for topiramate's effect is unknown. To assess topiramate's effect on ethanol's rewarding and conditioning rewarding effects, the present experiments examined the effects of topiramate on the acquisition and expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice. METHODS: A biased apparatus and subject assignment were used. Mice received ethanol (2 g/kg) or saline paired with an initially nonpreferred floor (CS+) and saline paired with an initially preferred floor (CS-) for 5-minute conditioning trials. During the acquisition experiments, mice received a pretreatment of topiramate (0, 5, 10, 20, 50, or 100 mg/kg) 1 hour before the CS+ trials. On intervening CS- trials, mice received a pretreatment of saline. For the preference test, all mice received saline injections and were placed on a split floor for a 30-minute test. During the expression experiments, mice received no drug pretreatment on conditioning trials, but were pretreated with topiramate (0, 10, 50, or 100 mg/kg) 1 hour before the test session. RESULTS: Ethanol-induced CPP was observed in both strains, but topiramate did not affect the acquisition or expression of ethanol-induced CPP in either strain. Despite its failure to alter CPP, topiramate produced dose-dependent locomotor activating effects in both strains. These effects were observed both in the presence and in the absence of ethanol. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that topiramate has no effect on ethanol's rewarding or conditioned rewarding effects as indexed by the place conditioning procedure. Thus, these studies raise the possibility that topiramate's efficacy in the treatment of alcoholism results from its impact on brain areas other than those that mediate ethanol's rewarding or conditioned rewarding effects. One alternative possibility is that topiramate decreases withdrawal-induced negative affective states that normally contribute to relapse.     

Effects of topiramate on ethanol and saccharin consumption and preferences in C57BL/6J mice

BACKGROUND: Topiramate has recently been found to be more effective than placebo as an adjunct treatment for alcohol dependence, but it has not yet been investigated in animal models of ethanol consumption. The current experiment examined the effects of topiramate on ethanol drinking in mice using a continuous access, two-bottle choice procedure. METHOD: C57BL/6J male mice were offered a 10% v/v ethanol solution versus tap water over 4 consecutive days per week. Mice were assigned to topiramate (1-50 mg/kg) or saline groups and received injections before the beginning of the dark phase of the light cycle. Topiramate dose increased over 5 successive weeks (1, 5, 10, 25, and 50 mg/kg). Fluid intake was measured 2, 4, and 23 hr after injection. Body weight and food intake were measured at the time of injection. In a second phase, mice were offered saccharin solutions (0.2 and 2.5% w/v) versus tap water after topiramate (50 mg/kg) or saline injections. RESULTS: Results revealed that high topiramate doses (25 and 50 mg/kg) increased water intake and decreased ethanol preference. Compared with saline controls, topiramate produced dose-dependent, bidirectional effects on ethanol dose, with 25 mg/kg of topiramate increasing ethanol dose at 4 and 23 hr after injection but 50 mg/kg topiramate decreasing ethanol dose at 2 hr after injection. During saccharin exposure, topiramate decreased saccharin preference (for 2.5% w/v saccharin solution) and marginally increased water intake but did not directly alter intake of the saccharin solutions. Topiramate had no effects on body weight or daily food intakes. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate reduced ethanol preference in C57BL/6J mice, but this effect was primarily attributable to elevated water intake. Topiramate also reduced saccharin preference, likely through marginally significant increases in water intake. Increases in water intake and bidirectional effects of topiramate on ethanol dose complicate conclusions with regard to the effects of topiramate on ethanol reward.     

Hybrid C57BL/6J x FVB/NJ mice drink more alcohol than do C57BL/6J mice

BACKGROUND: From several recent strain surveys (28 strains: Bachmanov et al., personal communication; 22 strains: Finn et al., unpublished), and from data in >100 other published studies of 24-hr two-bottle ethanol preference, it is known that male C57BL/6 (B6) mice self-administer about 10-14 g/kg/day and that female B6 mice self-administer about 12-18 g/kg/day. No strain has been found to consume more ethanol than B6. In one of our laboratories (Texas), we noted a markedly greater intake of ethanol in an F1 hybrid of B6 and FVB/NJ (FVB) mice. METHODS: To confirm and extend this finding, we repeated the study at another site (Portland) using concentrations up to 30% ethanol and also tested B6xFVB F1 mice in restricted access drinking procedures that produce high levels of alcohol intake. RESULTS: At both sites, we found that B6xFVB F1 mice self-administered high levels of ethanol during two-bottle preference tests (females averaging from 20 to 35 g/kg/day, males 7-25 g/kg/day, depending on concentration). F1 hybrids of both sexes drank significantly more 20% ethanol than both the B6 and FVB strains. Female F1 hybrids also drank more 30% ethanol. In the restricted access tests, ethanol consumption in the F1 hybrids was equivalent to that in B6 mice. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that this new genetic model has some significant advantages when compared to existing inbred strains, and could be used to explore the genetic basis of high ethanol drinking in mice.     

The Alcohol Deprivation Effect in C57BL/6J Mice is Observed Using Operant Self-Administration Procedures and is Modulated by CRF-1 Receptor Signaling

Background: The alcohol deprivation effect (ADE) is characterized by transient excessive alcohol consumption upon reinstatement of ethanol following a period of ethanol deprivation. While this phenomenon has been observed in rats using both bottle drinking (consummatory behavior) and operant self‐administration (consummatory and appetitive “ethanol‐seeking” behavior) procedures, ADE studies in mice have primarily relied on bottle drinking measures. Furthermore, the neurochemical pathways that modulate the ADE are not well understood. Therefore, we determined whether the ADE can be observed in C57BL/6J mice using operant self‐administration procedures and if expression of the ADE is modulated by the corticotropin releasing factor‐1 (CRF‐1) receptor. Methods: C57BL/6J mice were trained in a 2‐hour operant self‐administration paradigm to lever press for 10% ethanol or water on separate response keys. Between operant sessions, mice had access to ethanol in their homecage. Once stable responding occurred, mice were deprived of ethanol for 4 days and were then retested with ethanol in the operant paradigm for 3 consecutive days. Next, to assess the role of the CRF‐1 receptor, mice were given intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection (0, 10, or 20 mg/kg) of the CRF‐1 receptor antagonist CP‐154,526 30 minutes before ADE testing. Additional experiments assessed (i) ADE responding in which the alternate response lever was inactive, (ii) the effects of CP‐154,526 on self‐administration of a 1% sucrose solution following 4 days of deprivation, and (iii) ADE responding in which mice did not received i.p. injections throughout the experiment. Results: Mice exhibited a significant increase in postdeprivation lever responding for ethanol with either a water reinforced or inactive alternate lever. Interestingly, i.p. injection of a 10 mg/kg dose of CP‐154,526 protected against the ADE while not affecting lever responding for a sucrose solution. Finally, baseline and deprivation‐induced increases of ethanol reinforced lever responding were greater in mice not given i.p. injections. Conclusions: The ADE in C57BL/6J mice can be modeled using the operant self‐administration paradigm and increased ethanol self‐administration associated with the ADE is modulated by CRF‐1 receptor signaling.     

Strain Differences in Behavioral Inhibition in a Go/No‐go Task Demonstrated Using 15 Inbred Mouse Strains

Background: High levels of impulsivity have been associated with a number of substance abuse disorders including alcohol abuse. Research has not yet revealed whether these high levels predate the development of alcohol abuse. Methods: The current study examined impulsivity in 15 inbred strains of mice (A/HeJ, AKR/J, BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, C57BL/6J, C57L/J, C58/J, CBA/J, DBA/1J, DBA/2J, NZB/B1NJ, PL/J, SJL/J, SWR/J, and 129P3/J) using a Go/No‐go task, which was designed to measure a subject’s ability to inhibit a behavior. Numerous aspects of response to ethanol and other drugs of abuse have been examined in these strains. Results: There were significant strain differences in the number of responses made during the No‐go signal (false alarms) and the extent to which strains responded differentially during the Go and No‐go signals (d′). The rate of responding prior to the cue did not differ among strains, although there was a statistically significant correlation between false alarms and precue responding that was not related to basal activity level. Interstrain correlations suggested that false alarms and rate of responding were associated with strain differences in ethanol‐related traits from the published literature. Conclusions: The results of this study do support a link between innate level of impulsivity and response to ethanol and are consistent with a genetic basis for some measures of behavioral inhibition.     

Schedule-induced ethanol self-administration in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice

BACKGROUND: The purpose of these experiments was to provide an initial investigation into ethanol self-administration elicited in the schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP) paradigm. METHODS: Mature male mice were food deprived to between 80 and 85% of their baseline weight and received 20 daily 1 hr SIP test sessions in which a food pellet (20 mg) was delivered on a fixed-time 60 sec schedule. In different groups, the acquisition of drinking 5% (v/v) ethanol solution (experiment 1) or water (experiment 2) was recorded along with other behaviors that occurred in the test chambers. RESULTS: Results indicated that C57BL/6J mice drank significantly more ethanol than DBA/2J mice and that C57 mice achieved blood alcohol concentrations as high as 300 mg/dl. Blood alcohol concentrations were consistently correlated with g/kg ethanol intake. The groups did not differ in consumption of water. SIP test sessions using higher concentrations of ethanol (10-20% v/v, experiment 1) or sucrose solutions (0.1-2% w/v, experiment 2) then were performed. Group differences in ethanol consumption were maintained at all ethanol concentrations. Although DBAs drank more of a low concentration of sucrose (0.1%), when expressed as g/kg, sucrose intake was equivalent in the two strains at all concentrations. Analysis of the time course of drinking clearly showed that this behavior was adjunctive in nature. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the effectiveness of this procedure in inducing ethanol self-administration and its utility for investigating the genetic bases of vulnerability toward excessive ethanol consumption.     

Comparison of basal neuropeptide Y and corticotropin releasing factor levels between the high ethanol drinking C57BL/6J and low ethanol drinking DBA/2J inbred mouse strains

BACKGROUND: Recent genetic and pharmacological evidence indicates that low neuropeptide Y (NPY) levels in brain regions involved with neurobiological responses to ethanol promote increased ethanol consumption. Because of their opposing actions, it has been suggested that NPY and corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) exert a reciprocal regulation on drug self-administration. It has been widely reported that inbred C57BL/6 mice consume significantly higher amounts of ethanol than do DBA/2 mice. Therefore, we used immunohistochemical techniques to determine if basal NPY and/or CRF levels differed in predicted directions between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. METHODS: Ethanol-naive C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (100 mg/kg) and perfused transcardially with 0.1 mM of phosphate-buffered saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in buffered saline. Brains were collected and postfixed for 4 hr at 4 degrees C and then were cut into 35-microm sections. Tissues containing the nucleus accumbens (NAc), hypothalamus, and amygdala were processed for NPY or CRF immunoreactivity using immunofluorescent or DAB techniques. Immunoreactivity was quantified from digital images using Image J software. RESULTS: The C57BL/6J mice showed reduced NPY expression in the NAc shell, the basolateral amygdala, and the central nucleus of the amygdala when compared with DBA/2J mice. However, these strains did not differ in CRF expression in any of the brain regions analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that low NPY levels in the amygdala and/or the shell of the NAc, which are not compensated for by similar changes in CRF levels, may contribute to the high ethanol consumption characteristic of C57BL/6J mice.     

Acute alcohol withdrawal is associated with c-Fos expression in the basal ganglia and associated circuitry: C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mouse strain analyses

BACKGROUND: The DBA/2J (D2) and C57BL/6J (B6) mouse strains are the most widely studied genetic models of severe and mild acute alcohol withdrawal, respectively. Previous studies have identified quantitative trait loci and genes involved in risk for acute ethanol withdrawal using mapping populations derived from the D2 and B6 strains, but the brain region(s) and circuit(s) by which these genes and their protein products influence ethanol physiological dependence and associated withdrawal remain to be elucidated. METHODS: B6 and D2 were administered a sedative-hypnotic dose of ethanol (4 g/kg) or saline (control) and returned to their home cages where they were left undisturbed for 7 hr, which has been shown in previous studies to correspond to peak acute ethanol withdrawal severity. The mice were then euthanized and assessed for their numbers of c-Fos immunoreactive neurons across 26 brain regions. The question addressed was whether or not ethanol-withdrawn D2 and B6 mice differed in c-Fos induction (neural activation) within circuitry that could explain the severe ethanol withdrawal of the D2 strain and the mild ethanol withdrawal in B6 strain mice. RESULTS: At peak acute ethanol-withdrawal ethanol-withdrawn D2 and B6 mice differed in neural activation within the basal ganglia, including the subthalamic nucleus and the two major output nuclei of the basal ganglia (the medial globus pallidus and the substantia nigra pars reticulata). Genotype-dependent c-Fos induction was also apparent in associated circuitry including the lateral septum, the ventral tegmental area, the nucleus accumbens core, the dorsolateral caudate putamen, the substantia nigra pars compacta, the cingulate and entorhinal cortices, and the ventral pallidum. D2 and B6 mice showed comparable neural activation in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and the nucleus accumbens shell. CONCLUSIONS: The present studies are the first to use immediate early gene product expression to assess the pattern of neural activation associated with acute ethanol withdrawal. Our results point to the involvement of an extended basal ganglia circuit in genetically determined differences in acute ethanol withdrawal. Based on these data, we suggest that quantitative trait genes (QTGs) involved in acute ethanol withdrawal exert their effects on this phenotype via one or more of the brain regions and circuits identified. As more information becomes available that integrates neural circuit and QTG analyses, the precise mechanisms by which QTGs affect ethanol physiological dependence and associated withdrawal will become apparent.     

Naltrexone Effects on Ethanol Drinking Acquisition and on Established Ethanol Consumption in C57BL/6J Mice

Naltrexone's success as a treatment agent for alcoholism seems to be due to its ability to reduce craving in abstinent, dependent individuals and to reduce the pleasure associated with subsequent intake. However, more study is needed to establish the optimal amount of time that naltrexone treatment should be continued. Little information seems to have been collected regarding the most effective dosing regimen for reducing alcohol craving and consumption, and the usefulness of opiate antagonists in the prevention of alcohol dependence in nonaddicts, rather than just as a treatment agent in addicted individuals, also deserves further study. The alcohol-preferring C57BL/6J (B6) mice were used to: (1) study naltrexone effects on consumption in established drinkers using an increasing dosing regimen, (2) study naltrexone effects on the acquisition of ethanol drinking, and (3) study the effects of chronic naltrexone from timed-release pellets on drinking in alcohol-naive mice. Naltrexone reduced ethanol preference in established drinkers, but its effects waned at increasing doses. Naltrexone slowed the acquisition of ethanol drinking, but was ineffective when readministered after a phase when ethanol was offered in the absence of naltrexone. Mice with chronic naltrexone pellets consumed greater amounts of ethanol and showed higher ethanol preference than did placebo-pelleted animals. The observed reduced efficacy of naltrexone with increasing dosage and chronic treatment may have been due to naltrexone-induced opiate receptor changes. Such changes are presumably more likely to occur when naltrexone doses remain high or perhaps accumulate. Thus, dose and frequency of administration may be important factors in determining naltrexone's effectiveness in treating alcohol dependence.     

Strain-specific brain metallothionein II (MT-II) gene expression,its ethanol responsiveness,and association with ethanol preference in mice

BACKGROUND: Metallothioneins (MTs) are ubiquitously expressed intracellular proteins that bind heavy metals such as zinc, copper, and cadmium. Although their specific function has yet to be discovered, they are known to regulate the metabolism of these metals as well as respond to cellular stress agents, particularly oxidants. METHODS: Brain RNA from experimental (8 g/kg 25% ethanol injection) and control (saline injection) mice from four strains (A/J, BALB/cJ, C57BL/6J, DBA/2J) that are known to differ with respect to ethanol preference was used in differential displays. This report includes molecular results on one gene (MT-II) identified. RESULTS: Our results on differential displays suggest that a proportion of genes are differentially expressed across pair-wise strain comparisons. We identified MT-II as a strain-specific and ethanol-responsive gene. The level of MT-II messenger RNA (mRNA) in control mice of A/J, BALB/cJ, C57BL/6J, and DBA/2J strains was variable (0.50, 0.51, 0.90, and 0.14 times G3PDH expression, respectively). The degree of up-regulation in experimental mice was also somewhat variable among strains, ranging from 2.5 to 3.2 times expression over the matched controls. Experiments indicate that the promoter and genomic organization of the MT-II gene is identical in sequence for all four strains, and methylation studies revealed that the MT-II promoter region is unmethylated in the brains of these mice. Interestingly, MT-II expression in control mice demonstrated a positive correlation with the ethanol preference phenotype. CONCLUSION: An increase in MT-II mRNA levels after injection of ethanol is attributed to the antioxidant properties of MT-II. The differential mRNA levels of this gene among four strains are not accounted for by the genomic organization, DNA sequence, or methylation status of this gene. Furthermore, the observed correlation between MT-II mRNA levels and ethanol preference raises an interesting hypothesis about the possible role of MT-II in ethanol effects and preference in mice.     

Ethanol Consumption and Taste Preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129/J Mice

Mice of the C57BL/6ByJ (B6) and 129/J (129) strains were offered different concentrations of taste solutions in 48-hr, two-bottle choice tests. In comparison with the 129 strain, the B6 strain had higher preferences for ethanol, sucrose, and citric acid. They had lower preferences for NaCl and similar preferences for capsaicin and quinine hydrochloride. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that the higher ethanol intake by B6 mice depends, in part, on higher hedonic attractiveness of its sweet taste component.     

Sensitivity and Tolerance to the Hypnotic and Ataxic Effects of Ethanol in Adolescent and Adult C57BL/6J and DBA/2J Mice

Background: There is considerable research examining differences in adolescent and adult sensitivity and tolerance to ethanol related behavioral phenotypes. However, the available published data has almost exclusively assessed these behaviors in outbred rats. The present study was conducted using the alcohol preferring inbred mouse strain C57BL/6J (B6) and the alcohol nonpreferring inbred mouse strain DBA/2J (D2) to determine if differences in the sedative and ataxic effects of ethanol exist between adolescents and adults, and to determine whether there are any genetic influences involved therein. Methods: Adolescent and adult mice of each sex and genotype were given intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of ethanol (1.5, 1.75, or 4.0 g/kg) or saline and assessed for the loss of righting reflex (LORR) or hind footslips on the balance beam apparatus. These animals were then tested for the development of tolerance to these behaviors on subsequent days. Results: Despite evident pharmacokinetic differences, D2 adolescents were found to be relatively less sensitive to ethanol’s hypnotic actions than their adult D2 counterparts. Adolescent and adult B6 animals did not differ. Furthermore, although adult animals appeared to develop significantly greater degrees of tolerance to ethanol‐induced hypnosis compared with adolescents, these effects were likely in part related to differences in ethanol absorption/metabolism across time. Taking into account pharmacokinetic differences and the overall poor performance of male adults, adolescent animals were found to be equally if not more sensitive to the motor incoordinating (ataxic) effects of ethanol. Overall, tolerance to these effects varied by age and genotype but appeared to be related to changes in ethanol pharmacokinetics rather than strict behavioral sensitivity. Conclusion: The current work suggests that adolescent B6 and D2 inbred mice exhibit ontogenetic differences in sensitivity to ethanol’s hypnotic and ataxic effects. Importantly, in some cases age differences emerge as a function of differential ethanol pharmacokinetics. These results extend the current literature examining this critical developmental period in mice and illustrate the benefits of comparing ethanol related developmental differences in different genetic mouse populations.