Occupational dermatitis with simultaneous immediate and delayed allergy to chrysanthemum

A 42-year-old woman had recurrent dermatitis on the hands, arms, face and trunk for 5 years. She was allergic to chrysanthemum, with positive patch tests. She also had contact urticaria to chrysanthemum, with a wheal-and-flare reaction 15 min after application of chrysanthemum juice to a scratch test site. This was not seen in control subjects. The co-existance of allergic contact dermatitis and contact urticaria from chrysanthemum might play a role in the development of dermatitis, especially severe chronic dermatitis of her hands.     

Provocative use tests in CAPB-allergic subjects with CAPB-containing product

Cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) has been identified as a cause of contact allergy in personal care products. Furthermore, it has been suggested that chemicals responsible are impurities, especially dimethylaminopropylamine (DMAPA). However, skin contact concentrations with these impurities, especially DMAPA, are very low. The aim of the study was to analyse whether subjects with previous positive patch tests to CAPB would react in provocative use tests of a product containing CAPB. 10 individuals with a clinical history of contact allergy to CAPB (by positive patch test and history) took part in a ROAT which used a CAPB-based shower gel at 25% (DMAPA concentration < 1 ppm). None of the subjects showed positive allergic reactions. 1 of the test subjects did experience a flare of atopic dermatitis at the treatment site. Later, all 10 subjects were patch tested to 3 different concentrations of CAPB and DMAPA (0.1%, 0.3%, 1%) to verify the threshold that was capable of inducing a positive test reaction. 5/10 showed clear + reactions to 1% CAPB (typically at D3), whilst a further 3 gave marginal and/or irritant reactions. Only 1 of the subjects showed an allergic reaction to DMAPA. Finally, in uncontrolled use testing with the shower gel, none of the test subjects reported any adverse skin reactions. Thus, the study confirmed that CAPB-sensitive individuals can use a CAPB-based rinse-off product without the risk of experiencing an allergic reaction to CAPB.     

Sensitization to dimethyl fumarate with multiple concurrent patch test reactions

Background: Chairs and sofas imported from China to Europe were shown to contain dimethyl fumarate (DMF), a sensitizing, volatile chemical. Many of the sensitized patients also had positive patch test reactions to acrylates. Objectives: To analyse the occurrence and strength of DMF sensitization and the appearance of concomitant reactions. Methods: Patch testing with DMF in concentrations of 0.1–0.00001% was carried out in 37 patients. Diethyl fumarate (DEF), diethyl maleate (DEM), dimethyl maleate (DMM), ethyl acrylate (EA), methyl acrylate (MA), and methyl methacrylate (MMA) were also tested with a dilution series at equimolar concentrations. Results: The lowest concentration of DMF eliciting a reaction varied between 0.0001% and 0.1% and all but four patients reacted concurrently to DEF. DEM elicited positive patch test reactions in 21/37 patients and DMM reactions were seen in all 9 patients tested. EA elicited positive reactions in 13/37 patients and a positive MA reaction was seen in 7/37 patients, 2 of whom also reacted to MMA. Conclusions: The strength of the sensitization to DMF showed variation and concurrent reactions were common. Concurrent reactions to (meth)acrylates were seen in patients, who reacted to lower (0.001% or less) DMF concentration probably elicited by cross‐reactivity.     

Type IV hypersensitivity reactions to natural rubber latex: results of a multicentre study

BACKGROUND: Positive patch test reactions to natural rubber latex (NRL) have been interpreted as allergic or irritant by different groups. Additives to the NRL test solution have also caused positive reactions in previous studies. OBJECTIVES: Five centres of the British Contact Dermatitis Group conducted a prospective study on the prevalence of type IV hypersensitivity to NRL, using ammonia-preserved NRL solution for testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2738 consecutive patients were patch tested. Where clinically indicated, specific IgE was measured or a prick test done. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (1%) had a positive patch test reaction to NRL, which was considered to be allergic and of current relevance in 19 (70%) patients. Fourteen of these also had a positive prick test or specific IgE. Thirteen patients (48%) were male, 19 (70%) atopic and 13 (48%) had eczema on their hands. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that delayed-type hypersensitivity to NRL is a problem for a proportion of patients with eczema, particularly on their hands, and that patch testing with ammonia-preserved NRL can be recommended to identify these patients. Patients with a positive patch test should be investigated for contact urticaria to NRL.     

An epidemic of furniture-related dermatitis: searching for a cause

Background  Sitting in new chairs or sofas has elicited dermatitis in numerous patients in Finland and in the U.K. since autumn 2006. The cause of the dermatitis seemed to be an allergen in the furniture materials.
Objectives  To determine the cause of the dermatitis in patients with furniture-related dermatitis.
Methods  Altogether 42 patients with furniture-related dermatitis were studied. First, 14 Finnish patients were patch tested with the standardized series and with the chair textile material. A thin-layer chromatogram (TLC) strip and an extract made from the same textile material were tested in seven Finnish patients. The test positive spot of the TLC and the content of a sachet found inside a sofa in the U.K. were analysed by using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. All chemicals analysed were patch tested in 37 patients.
Results  A positive patch test reaction to the chair textile and to its extract was seen in all patients tested, one-third of whom had concurrent reactions to acrylates. Positive reactions to the same spot of the TLC strip were seen in five of seven patients and dimethyl fumarate was analysed from the spot as well as from the sachet contents. Dimethyl fumarate (0·01%) elicited positive reactions in all the patients. The other chemicals analysed did not elicit positive reactions, but one patient in the U.K. had a positive reaction to tributyl phosphate.
Conclusions  Sensitization to dimethyl fumarate was seen in all the patients with furniture-related dermatitis. Concurrent sensitization or cross-reactions were common among the sensitized patients.     

The fragrance mix and its constituents: a 14-year material

Results from 14 years of patch testing with the fragrance mix and its constituents are reviewed. From 1979–1992, 8215 consecutive patients were patch tested with the fragrance mix and 449 (5.5%) had a positive reaction. An increase in the frequency of reactions to fragrance mix was seen from the first 5-year period to the last. Only 54.4% of the patients tested in the last 5-year period with the individual constitutents of the mix had at least 1 positive reaction. The results of testing with the constituents are the basis for a discussion of methodological problems. A significant decrease in the frequency of reaction to cinnamic aldehyde was registered, at the same time as the test concentration was reduced from 2% to 1% pet. However, no significant variations in the frequency of reactions to oak moss were seen, notwithstanding a similar reduction in test concentration.     

Gold allergy in North America.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of allergic reactions to gold among patients tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) from 1996 to 1998. METHODS: This is a prospective analysis of patch test results from the 12 centers that comprise the NACDG. Gold was tested as gold sodium thiosulfate (0.5% in petrolatum [pet]), along with 49 other screening allergens, in patients presenting with possible contact dermatitis. RESULTS: Of 4,101 patients tested, 388 (9.5%) had a positive patch test result to gold. Women accounted for 62.8% of the subjects tested and 90.2% of patients positive to gold (P < .0001). The most common sites of dermatitis in gold-allergic patients were the hands (29.6%), face (19.3%), and eyelids (7.5%). Nickel and cobalt allergies, respectively, also were present in 33.5% and 18.3% of gold allergic individuals, as compared with 14.2% and 9.0% of the total population. Gold was the only positive reaction in 15.2% of the 388 patients. CONCLUSION: Gold is a more common allergen than previously reported and might cause facial and eyelid dermatitis. Hypersensitivity to gold is statistically linked to female gender and to allergic reactions to nickel and cobalt.     

Prevalence of gold sensitivity in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations.

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to gold sodium thiosulfate in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations is often unclear. Knowledge of the prevalence of gold sensitivity in individuals with and without gold dental restorations is required to better understand the relevance of these reactions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to gold in asymptomatic individuals with gold dental restorations (gold patients) compared with similar individuals without gold dental appliances (nongold patients). METHODS: One hundred thirty-six healthy, asymptomatic patients were patch tested to gold sodium thiosulfate, nickel sulfate and palladium chloride. Readings occurred after 2 days and 7 days. RESULTS: Of the patients tested, 24 of 71 (33.8%) gold patients had a positive reaction to gold versus 7 of 65 (10.8%) of the nongold patients, P <.001. Of those with a positive gold reaction, 12 of 31 (38.7%) also had a positive nickel reaction. Nickel alone was positive in 18 of 71 (25. 4%) of gold patients versus 11 of 65 (16.9%) of nongold patients. 19 of 29 (65.5%) of those with a positive nickel reaction also reacted to palladium and 19 of 22 (86.4%) of those with a palladium reaction also reacted to nickel. The rate of allergy to gold computed over a 3-year period for patients patch tested in the Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) Contact Dermatitis Clinic was 13.5% (46/342). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of gold sensitivity in individuals with gold dental restorations is approximately 33.8%. This is significantly greater than the 10.8% prevalence seen in individuals without gold dental appliances, as well as greater than the 3-year rate from the OHSU Contact Dermatitis Clinic. This data should help shed light on issues of clinical relevance.     

Berufsbedingtes Kontaktekzem und Asthma bronchiale bei ungewöhnlicher allergischer Reaktion vom Spättyp auf Hydroxychloroquin

We report the case of a a 60 year-old worker in the pharmaceutical industry who suffered from recurring contact dermatitis. Initially the contact dermatitis was limited to the hands; later on it became generalized. The patient had been working on a drug filling line in a pharmaceutical plant for more than 20 years. Eight years after starting this job he had developed allergic hand dermatitis to 2,6-diaminopyridine (patch test positive); this healed upon cessation of exposure. Ten years later he again developed hand dermatitis which progressed to generalized dermatitis and conjunctivitis. Under systemic and local therapy with corticosteroids and cessation of work, it healed nearly completely. Four months after returning to work, the patient experienced a first episode of severe asthma and generalized dermatitis with conjunctivitis following exposure to hydroxychloroquine the day before. The asthma and dermatitis improved after systemic corticosteroid therapy and stopping work. His condition continued to fluctuate, when though the patient was transferred at work and now wore rubber gloves. Eight months later he again developed a generalized dermatitis. Patch testing revealed delayed-type sensitizations to hydroxychloroquine (tested in concentrations of 0. 1%, 0.5%, 1% and 2%). Equivalent tests in five healthy volunteers were negative. The patch test reactions were pustular, while a biopsy was interpreted as a multiform contact dermatitis reaction. Bronchial exposure with hydroxychloroquine dust produced a delayed bronchial obstruction over the next 20 hours, which progressed to fever and generalized erythema (hematogenous contact dermatitis). After removing exposure to 2,6-diaminopyridine and hydroxychloroquine, the patient went on to develop a contact dermatitis to latex (patch test positive). However, skin prick tests with latex and patch tests with rubber additiva were negative. Hydroxychloroquine is well known to cause drug reactions. To our knowledge, contact dermatitis to this substance has not yet been reported. It is noteworthy that the patch test reactions were pustular and of multiform morphology and that bronchial exposure to the allergen resulted in asthma and a generalized drug reaction. Pathogenetically the asthmatic reaction seems to be on a delayed-type mechanism as is also seen with ampicillin, cobalt and nickel induced asthma.     

Patch tests with thiurams at 0.25% pet. and 1% pet. are of equal diagnostic value

Thiuram mix is tested in the standard series at a test concentration of 1% pet. The single thiurams (DPTD, TMTD, TMTM, TETD), however, are usually tested at 0.25% pet. in Germany. In other countries, the individual components of thiuram mix are tested at 1% pet. The German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG) compared both patch test concentrations in 530 patients in order to find out if (i) a significant number of positive patch tests are missed by testing at the lower concentration, (ii) problems with irritant test reactions occur by increasing the test concentration to 1%, and (iii) the sensitivity of the thiuram mix rises when the breakdown test is done with the higher concentration. Slightly more positive reactions were seen with the higher concentration, but this increase did not reach statistical significance. The reaction index, as a measure for the relation of positive to irritant and/or questionable reactions, remained unchanged for the individual thiurams. The sensitivity of the mix also did not change when the breakdown test was performed with 1% pet. instead of 0.25% pet. Thus, we conclude that both concentrations are of equal diagnostic value in patch testing.     

A study of cross-reactions between mango contact allergens and urushiol

The allergens causing mango dermatitis have long been suspected to be alk(en)yl catechols and/or alk(en)yl resorcinols on the basis of observed cross-sensitivity reactions to mango in patients known to be sensitive to poison ivy and oak (Toxicodendron spp.). Earlier, we reported the 3 resorcinol derivatives: heptadecadienylresorcinol (I), heptadecenylresorcinol (II) and pentadecylresorcinol (III); collectively named 'mangol', as mango allergens. In this study, we extracted the 1st 2 components (I and II) from the Philippine mango, adjusted them to 0.05% concentration in petrolatum and patch tested the components on 2 subjects with mango dermatitis. Both subjects reacted to I. 1 subject also elicited a weaker positive reaction to II. To investigate the cross-reaction between mangol and urushiol, we also patch tested the same subjects with urushiol. The subject sensitive to II reacted to urushiol. 6 subjects with a history of lacquer contact dermatitis and positive reactions to urushiol were similarly patch tested. 5 persons reacted to I. 2 subjects also exhibited a slower but positive reaction to II. This is the 1st report in which heptadec(adi)enyl resorcinols known to be present in mango have been shown to elicit positive patch test reactions in mango-sensitive patients.     

Which children should we patch test?

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in childhood was considered rare until recently. However, reports are increasing, which may reflect an increased incidence and/or more frequent patch testing of children. It is also likely that allergen exposure in children has changed with time. AIMS: To determine the most common contact allergens and the rate of positive patch-test reactions among children with suspected contact allergy. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective case study of 114 children (66 girls and 48 boys) aged from 3 to 15 years (median 11.5) patch tested over a 3-year period. Indications for patch testing included uncontrolled or deteriorating atopic dermatitis, localized dermatitis or a history of reacting to a specific allergen. RESULTS: Of 110 children for whom we had notes, 83 (75%) had a history of atopy. Positive reactions that were of current, past or possible relevance were seen in 61 children (54%); in 58 (52%) of 111 tested with the standard series (SS) and in 6 (10%) of 60 tested with the medicament series. None of the children patch tested to the corticosteroid (n = 47), shoe (n = 15), fragrance (n = 12), cosmetic (n = 10) or rubber (n = 5) series had a positive reaction. However, 11 (10%) reacted to rubber allergens within the SS and one of five to their own shoes. The lowest rate of relevant positive reactions was among those with deteriorating atopic dermatitis (22%) and facial (33%) or perioral dermatitis (40%), and the highest rate amongst those with eyelid (86%) or hand (71%) dermatitis. Nickel was the most common allergen (20%) in line with previous reports (82% female), followed by rubber chemicals (10%), fragrance (7.2%), cobalt (5.4%) and lanolin (wool alcohol) (4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The reported incidence of ACD among children, in particular nickel and rubber allergy, appears to be increasing, which may relate to changing fashions and hobbies. Contact allergy should be considered in all children with dermatitis, particularly with eyelid or hand dermatitis, and patch testing carried out more frequently.     

Gramineae pollen as trigger factors of atopic eczema: evaluation of diagnostic measures using the atopy patch test

After contact with grass pollen, seasonal exacerbations of eczematous skin lesions have been described in a subgroup of patients with atopic eczema (AE). Epicutaneous patch testing with aeroallergens (atopy patch test, APT) has been used to investigate these patients. We performed comparative APT in 79 patients with AE and 20 control subjects (14 non-atopic volunteers and six patients with grass pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis). Subjects were tested with grass pollen allergen extract in petrolatum and with unprocessed native dry pollen of Dactylis glomerata . Results after 48 h were compared with the patient's history, corresponding skin prick test and specific IgE. Fifteen of the 79 AE patients showed clear-cut eczematous reactions to unprocessed D. glomerata pollen; 14 of these had an elevated serum IgE to D. glomerata and 13 had a positive skin prick test. Twenty patients had a positive APT reaction to grass pollen allergen extract, including 12 of the D. glomerata reactive subjects ( P  < 0.001). Positive patch test reactions to D. glomerata were seen in 66.7% of cases with and 10.5% of patients without a predictive history of exacerbations during the pollen season. For the standardized extract, these percentages were 75% vs. 16.4% ( P  < 0.001). No side-effects were observed. Control subjects showed no positive reactions. We conclude that grass pollen preparations may be used to investigate trigger factors for eczematous skin lesions in a subgroup of patients with AE.     

Delayed hypersensitivity to topical corticosteroids

Topical hypersensitivity to corticosteroids was studied by epicutaneous testing using the Finn Chamber technic. The steroids were tested in both ethanol and white petrolatum and, in certain cases, in dimethyl sulfoxide. Additionally, commercial preparations were tested. Three groups of patients were studied: (1) patients with a history of hypersensitivity to at least two topical preparations (five of ten patients studied showed a positive patch test reaction for corticosteroids), (2) patients in whom topical corticosteroid hypersensitivity was suspected because of treatment-resistant eczema (seven of twenty-five patients showed a positive patch test reaction), and (3) dermatologic inpatients and outpatients undergoing epicutaneous testing for suspected topical hypersensitivity. Hydrocortisone-17-butyrate (H-17-B) was included in the standard patch test series; of 450 patients tested, two showed a positive patch test reaction. All the patients with corticosteroid hypersensitivity had a positive reaction to H-17-B. In six patients, additional hypersensitivities to one or several other steroid preparations were seen. Use testing was performed as an open test, with 0.1% or 1% H-17-B in ethanol on normal skin of the flexor side of the upper extremities. A positive test reaction was seen in only one of nine patients. Results of use testing with the commercial 0.1% H-17-B (Locoid) ointment were always negative. Our study suggests that the sensitivity of patch tests for corticosteroid hypersensitivity can be increased by using ethanol as vehicle.     

Intradermal testing in doubtful cases of contact allergy to metals

Among 1670 consecutively patch tested patients an intradermal test with chromium, cobalt and nickel was added in 66 cases. There were three indications for intradermal testing: 1) the patch test reaction at 72 h was difficult to interpret; among 49 patients with one or more doubtful reactions a metal allergy was confirmed in 24 and rejected in 54. 2) ten patients with a negative patch test in spite of a positive history of metal allergy; among these, one was positive to cobalt, two to nickel and the other seven negative. 3) seven patients checked for a previously diagnosed allergy; a metal allergy was confirmed in four. Intradermal testing is recommended for confirmation of doubtful patch test reactions, particularly to disclose false positive reactions to metals.     

Citral a fragrance allergen and irritant

Citral is a well known contact allergen and a contact irritant. Routine patch testing in the past may have been restricted because of possible irritant (IR) patch test responses. 586 consecutive patients, with hand eczema, were patch tested with a selection of fragrances including citral 2% petrolatum and the European standard series. 28 of the patients showed a positive patch test reaction (+ to +++) to citral and 82 at least 1 IR patch test reaction and no positive patch test reaction to citral. A statistically significant association between a positive patch test reaction to citral and positive patch test reactions to other fragrances compared with IR reactions (n = 82) was established. The difference regarding fragrance history found between those with IR and positive reactions to citral was not significant. Citral could be an allergen and/or irritant, worthy of further more extensive studies.     

Patch test reaction on Ethiopian subjects with eczema

Background  Allergic contact dermatitis is a common condition with an incidence of 1–10% in the general population. An increasing number of allergens in the environment are responsible for the condition. These allergens can be identified using patch testing. Many countries have a standard series of common allergens used for patch testing. There is no standard series of allergens in Ethiopia, and our objective was to obtain baseline data for common allergens for future standardization.
Methods  One hundred and eighty-one subjects with eczema were patch tested using 17 selected allergens from Chemotechnique Diagnostics AB employing a standard procedure.
Results  Positive patch test reactions were detected in more than 60% of subjects, the most common allergen being nickel, followed by fragrance mix and butylphenolformaldehyde. A higher incidence of positive reactions was seen in females.
Conclusions  A high incidence of positive patch test reactions was identified in the study population, and the introduction of patch testing in Ethiopia is essential for the management of allergic contact dermatitis.     

Contact sensitization to N-(cyclohexylthio)phthalimide

Previous reports revealed relative high sensitization rates to the rubber chemical N-(cyclohexylthio)phthalimide (CTP; CAS-No. 17796-82-6), but the relevance of positive reactions remained unknown. It was discussed whether the test concentration of 1% pet. needed to be changed. The German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG) added CTP in 3 concentrations, i.e. 0.25% pet., 0.5% pet, 1% pet., to the rubber series. From June 1999 to December 2000, 1936 patients in 30 departments of dermatology were tested with CTP. Of the 56 patients with a positive test reaction (2.9%), 52 reacted to CTP 1% pet., 21 to CTP 0.5% pet., and 9 to CTP 0.25% pet. The reaction indices were about the same with all concentrations. 34 patients with a positive reaction to CTP 1% pet. did not react to the lower concentrations. The majority of these reactions are probably false-positive. With CTP 0.25% pet., however, the majority of true allergic reactions to CTP were missed. Analysis of population characteristics and concomitant sensitizations to other rubber chemicals led to the conclusion that a positive reaction to CTP 0.5% pet. was a good indicator of contact allergy to CTP. Thus, the DKG decided to continue patch testing with CTP 0.5% pet. in the rubber series. Manufacturers' information about the use of CTP seem to partly contradict the patients' characteristics seen in this study. So the relevance of positive CTP patch test reactions, and the causative exposures in patients with CTP allergy, still remain to be clarified.     

The influence of patch tests with clobetasol propionate on adjacent patch test reactions

Contact allergy to corticosteroids now seems frequent among patients being patch tested. As corticosteroids are intrinsically anti-inflammatory, we investigated whether patch tests with a potent corticosteroid might suppress simultaneous adjacent patch test reactions to another allergen. Nickel-sensitive subjects were patch tested with an aqueous dilution series of nickel in duplicate, adjacent to patch tests with clobetasol propionate 1% in ethanol and with ethanol, respectively. Statistical evaluation of the results obtained in 2 different centers, using their own patch test techniques, did not reveal any suppression of the positive nickel patch test reactions.     

Patch testing with fine fragrances: comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series

High frequencies of contact allergy to fragrance ingredients have been reported in recent years. Only approximately 70-80% are detected by fragrance allergens in the standard patch test series. This investigation compares the patch test reactions to fine fragrances with reactions to fragrance mix (FM), balsam of Peru (BP) (Myroxylon pereirae resin) and a fragrance series. 641 consecutive patients with eczema were patch tested with the European standard series and with selected fine fragrances. Those who were positive to 1 of the fine fragrances or the FM or BP were also tested with the fragrance series. 95 (14.8%) patients were found to have a positive patch test reaction to FM or BP; 41 (6.4%) had positive results to fragrance no. 1 and 29 (4.5%) to no. 2. 9 (9.5% of the 95 positive patients) had a positive reaction to fine fragrances and a negative reaction to all other fragrance allergens in the standard series. These findings indicate that testing with fine fragrances can add to our evaluation of fragrance-sensitive patients.