基于自发呈报系统二肽基肽酶-Ⅳ抑制剂上市后泌尿系统不良反应信号研究

目的：挖掘与分析二肽基肽酶-Ⅳ（DPP-4）抑制剂不良反应信号,为临床合理用药提供参考。方法：采用报告比值比（ROR）法对FDA不良事件报告系统（AERS）进行DPP-4抑制剂不良反应信号挖掘。结果：纳入2015年第1季度至2020年第2季度的AERS数据,得到首要怀疑DPP-4抑制剂的不良反应报告例数分别为西格列汀27 537、维格列汀87、沙格列汀2 232、阿格列汀655、利格列汀1 489,对应的不良反应信号个数分别为630、0、100、39、42,其中泌尿系统不良反应信号个数分别为41、0、4、0、6。在发生泌尿系统ADR的患者中,西格列汀的男性略多于女性,沙格列汀、利格列汀的男女人数相当;3个药物的患者年龄均集中在65岁以上;西格列汀剂量集中在100 mg·d^-1,沙格列汀5 mg·d^-1略多于2.5 mg·d^-1,利格列汀均为5 mg·d^-1;西格列汀半年内及1年以上的上报数较多,沙格列汀的上报数集中在1个月以上1年以内,利格列汀1年以上的上报数最多。结论：西格列汀可致多种泌尿系统不良反应,其次为利格列汀、沙格列汀。当患者存在严重泌尿系统病变时,避免选择西格列汀,可选择阿格列汀,谨慎选择沙格列汀、利格列汀。     

不同DPP-4抑制剂的构效关系和药代动力学特征

二肽基肽酶-4（DPP-4）抑制剂是治疗2型糖尿病的新靶点,强效和选择性DPP-4抑制剂已成为糖尿病治疗新药的开发热点。本文主要对已在国内上市的西格列汀、沙格列汀、维格列汀和利格列汀4种DPP-4抑制剂的构效关系以及药代动力学特点,吸收、分布、代谢、消除进行综述。     

二肽基肽酶Ⅳ抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病的系统评价再评价

目的对二肽基肽酶Ⅳ（DPP-4）抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病的有效性及安全性进行评价。方法计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、EMBASE、ScienceCitationIndex、中国期刊全文数据库、中文科技期刊数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方医学数据库,检索时间截至2013年8月。英文检索词包括sitagliptin、vildagliptin、saxagliptin、linagliptin、alogliptin、dipeptidyl-peptidase1V、systematicreviews和meta-analysis,中文检索词包括西格列汀、维格列汀、沙格列汀、利格列汀、阿格列汀、二肽基肽酶Ⅳ抑制剂、系统评价和meta分析。根据纳入和排除标准,提取符合标准的系统评价／meta分析,用OQAQ量表评价其方法学质量并赋分（1-7分,分数高者质量好）,用描述性分析的方法分析资料,主要结局指标包括糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白（HbAlc）、稳态模型的p细胞功能指数（HOMA-B）和不良事件发生率。结果共纳入18个系统评ffF／meta分析,方法学质量评分为6．0～7．0者16个占89％。18篇文献中13篇评价了DPP-4抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者HbAlc水平的影响,西格列汀、维格列汀、沙格列汀和利拉列汀在降低HbAlc水平方面与其他口服降糖药相似,沙格列汀与西格列汀降低HbAlc疗效相似。5篇文献评价了DPP-4抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者HOMA·母的影响。与安慰剂相比,西格列汀、维格列汀、沙格列汀能有效改善2型糖尿病患者的HOMA—p水平;西格列汀改善2型糖尿病患者HOMA．B水平的疗效不优于其他口服降糖药。14篇文献评价了DPP-4抑制剂治疗过程中的不良事件发生率,应用西格列汀、维格列汀、沙格列汀和利拉列汀治疗的患者不良事件发生率和低血糖发生率与应用安慰剂的患者比较差异无统计学意义;西格列汀和维格列汀诱发低血糖的概率低于其他口服降糖药。结论DPP-4抑制剂能有效控制2型糖尿病患者的血糖,短期安全性较好。     

五种上市DPP-4抑制剂的临床药动学比较

二肽基肽酶-4（DPP-4）抑制剂是治疗2型糖尿病的一类新型口服药物。本文对五种上市DPP-4抑制剂（阿格列汀,利格列汀,沙格列汀,西他列汀和维格列汀）的临床药动学及其影响因素和药物相互作用进行了系统综述,旨在为临床医师制定个体治疗方案提供依据。     

利格列汀治疗2型糖尿病重度肾脏损伤患者有效性和安全性的临床应用

目的：观察DPP-4抑制剂利格列汀治疗2型糖尿病重度肾脏损伤患者的有效性和安全性。方法：84例2型糖尿病（HbA1c 7.0%~10.0%）合并严重肾脏损伤（eGFR < 30 mL·min^-1·1.73 m^-2）患者,在原有降糖药物基础上,按1：1比例随机分为利格列汀组（5 mg每日一次口服）（n=41）和安慰剂组（n=43）。主要有效终点是12周后HbA1c自基线的变化。结果：12周后,利格列汀组HbA1c下降0.71%,而安慰剂组下降0.12%（P < 0.000 1）。利格列汀组与安慰剂相比,1,5脱水葡萄糖醇明显升高（36.4±12.3）ng·mL^-1 vs.（10.4±5.2）ng·mL^-1,P<0.05）。两组总的不良反应类似（35% vs. 32.5%）,严重低血糖反应率都较低（每组2例）。利格列汀和安慰剂对肾功能影响较小（eGFR下降,0.8 mL·min^-1·1.73 m^-2 vs.2 mL·min^-1·1.73 m^-2）,没有药物相关的肾衰竭发生。结论：利格列汀治疗2型糖尿病严重肾脏损伤患者,有效地降低血糖,严重低血糖发生少,且没有影响肾功能、引起药物相关的肾衰,是可以用于治疗2型糖尿病重度肾脏损伤患者的降糖药物。     

二肽基肽酶Ⅳ抑制剂的安全性评价

β细胞胰岛素分泌缺陷和α细胞胰高糖素不适当的分泌增加是2型糖尿病发病和进展的重要原因。二肽基肽酶Ⅳ（dipeptidyl-peptidaseIV,DPP-4）抑制剂具有独特的降糖机制,它可选择性抑制DPP-4的活性,阻止内源性胰高血糖素样肽1的裂解,从而通过促进β细胞分泌胰岛素、抑制仪细胞分泌胰高糖素,改善紊乱的胰岛功能,调节机体血糖水平达稳态。目前,已有西格列汀、阿格列汀、沙格列汀、维格列汀和利格列汀等DPP-4抑制剂在欧美地区、日本和我国上市。     

SGLT-2抑制剂与其他降糖药物对比治疗2型糖尿病有效性与安全性的网状Meta分析

目的：采用网状Meta分析研究评价钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂（sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors,SGLT-2抑制剂）与其他降糖药物对比治疗2型糖尿病（type 2 diabetes,T2DM）的有效性和安全性。方法：计算机检索Embase、PubMed、OVID、clinicaltrials.gov网站、万方、知网和维普数据库。检索时间从建库至2019年5月30日,并筛选研究SGLT-2抑制剂与其他降糖药物治疗T2DM的有效性和安全性的临床随机对照试验（clinicalrandomized trials,RCT）。结果：共纳入12项RCTs,总计8 845名患者。网状Meta分析结果显示,卡格列净、恩格列净、达格列净、埃格列净与二甲双胍、格列美脲、西他列汀、利格列汀相比：（1）恩格列净以及达格列净与二甲双胍相比,未能明显降低患者的HbA1c （P<0.05）;卡格列净300 mg以及埃格列净15 mg对比格列美脲及西他列汀能明显降低患者的HbA1c （P<0.05）;与利格列汀相比,SGLT-2抑制剂均无显著性差异（P>0.05）。（2）仅达格列净在降低患者FPG上与其他降糖药物无显著性差异（P>0.05）。（3）卡格列净及恩格列净能显著降低患者的体质量（P<0.05）。（4） SGLT-2抑制剂均不会增加不良反应发生率,无显著性差异（P>0.05）。（5）与格列美脲相比,SGLT-2抑制剂均不会增加患者低血糖的发生率（P<0.05）,但与另外3个降糖药物相比,无显著性差异（P>0.05）。结论：卡格列净、恩格列净、达格列净、埃格列净治疗2型糖尿病有效,且均不会增加患者不良反应及低血糖的发生率。根据4种药物的等级概率排序,其中埃格列净疗效最好,但由于该药物的纳入文献较少,仍需高质量、大样本的RCT再进行更进一步的评估;此外,4种药物的安全性均较高。     

二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂上市后的类天疱疮不良事件：基于FAERS数据库的药物警戒研究

目的 应用FDA不良事件报告系统(FDA adverse event reporting system, FAERS)对二肽基肽酶-4(Dipeptidyl peptidase Ⅳ,DPP-4)抑制剂上市后的大疱性类天疱疮的不良事件进行研究。方法 检索2006年至2021年所有DPP-4抑制剂不良事件报告的数据,筛选出这些报告中与大疱性类天疱疮有关的不良事件报告进行分析,同时采用报告比值比(Reporting odds ratio, ROR)法对大疱性类天疱疮不良事件数据进行挖掘分析。结果 最终得到类天疱疮不良事件的首要怀疑药物为DPP-4抑制剂的报告共计251份,其中阿格列汀19份,利格列汀102份,沙格列汀5份,西格列汀95份,维格列汀30份。这些报告中男性多于女性,主要集中于75岁以上老年患者,且日本地区的上报数最多,类天疱疮相关的报告从2013年起呈逐年增加趋势,2019年达到最多。DPP-4抑制剂的大疱性类天疱疮的信号强度比较：维格列汀>阿格列汀>利格列汀>西格列汀>沙格列汀,同时与其他糖尿病药物相比,ROR明显高于其他糖尿病药物。结论 通过不良事件信...     

二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂上市后药品不良反应信号挖掘与分析

目的 促进二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂西格列汀、沙格列汀、阿格列汀、利格列汀的临床安全、合理用药。方法 采用计算机检索美国食品药物管理局不良事件报告系统2004年1月1日至2021年3月31日西格列汀、沙格列汀、阿格列汀、利格列汀的药品不良反应（ADR）报告,采用报告比值比（ROR）法检测4种DPP-4抑制剂的ADR信号,重点关注ROR较高、药品说明书尚未提及及文献报道较少的ADR信号。结果 共纳入63 944份ADR报告,分别为西格列汀48 265份、沙格列汀6 969份、阿格列汀1 654份、利格列汀7 056份。4种DPP-4抑制剂在内分泌疾病,新陈代谢与营养不良,血管病,肝胆疾病,胃肠道疾病,肾脏和泌尿系统疾病,良性、恶性肿瘤及不明新生物（包括囊肿和息肉）中ADR信号均较强。其中,胃食管静脉曲张方面,沙格列汀（ROR=15.67）和阿格列汀（ROR=13.53）ADR信号均较强;阿格列汀血栓性脑梗死（ROR=114.03）ADR信号较强;西格列汀坏死性胰腺炎ADR信号较强（ROR=8.03）;抗利尿激素分泌异常方面,沙格列汀（ROR=2.10）和阿格列汀（ROR=6.66...     

DPP-4抑制剂的药代动力学特点

DP P-4抑制剂作为治疗2型糖尿病的新型药物正在崭露头角,目前已上市的DPP-4抑制剂有西格列汀、维格列汀和沙格列汀.本文就这3种DP P-4抑制剂的主要药代动力学特点,吸收、分布、代谢和排泄进行综述.     

Network meta-analysis of liraglutide versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japanese patients

Aims: To determine the comparative efficacy and safety of liraglutide and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors as antidiabetics for Japanese patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Methods and materials: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating outcomes among Japanese adults with uncontrolled T2DM and including liraglutide or DPP-4 inhibitors up to August 2016. We extracted data on trial and patient characteristics, and the following outcomes: HbA1c, weight, patients meeting HbA1c <7%, patients experiencing hypoglycemic events, microalbuminuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and creatinine. We synthesized data using network meta-analyses (NMA) using a Bayesian framework. Continuous outcomes were modeled using normal likelihoods and an identity link, while dichotomous outcomes were modeled using a binomial likelihood and a logit link.

Results: The systematic literature review yielded 39 publications pertaining to 38 trials. A total of 27 trials (5032 patients) reported change in HbA1c at 12 weeks and at 24 weeks 9 trials (2091 patients). All treatments showed statistically significant reductions in HbA1c relative to placebo at 12 and 24 weeks. Liraglutide 0.9?mg was statistically superior to all DPP-4 interventions (vildagliptin, sitagliptin, linagliptin, alogliptin, teneligliptin, trelagliptin and omarigliptin) at 12 weeks and 24 weeks among those reporting. Treatments were not statistically differentiable with respect to weight change and risk of hypoglycemia. Finally, no comparisons of eGFR and microalbuminuria were conducted, as this data was reported in too few trials to conduct analyses.

Limitations: Some important outcomes were limited by poor reporting (eGFR and microalbuminuria) or low event rates (hypoglycemia). The follow-up time was relatively short. Clinically, the 24 week time point is more important as it demonstrates more sustained results.

Conclusions: Our research suggests that liraglutide 0.9?mg offers a more efficacious treatment option for T2DM than the DPP-4 inhibitors among adult Japanese patients and that it is a viable option for this population.     

口服降糖药二肽基肽酶Ⅳ（DPP-4）抑制剂的多器官保护作用

二肽基肽酶Ⅳ（DPP-4）抑制剂是近年来新上市的一种新型口服降糖药物。 DPP-4抑制剂通过抑制DPP-4来抑制胰岛素多肽（GIP）和胰高血糖素样肽1（GLP-1）降解,发挥降低血糖的作用。 DPP-4抑制剂不仅能双向控制血糖,且具有降糖外的胰腺、心血管、肾脏、肝脏等多器官保护作用和抗炎作用。本文对已有的DPP-4抑制剂及其多器官保护作用进行综述,总结其优势及进一步发展的趋势,为临床用药提供参考。     

Linagliptin and newer DPP-4 inhibitors: newer uses and newer indications

The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors linagliptin, sitagliptin, saxagliptin, vildagliptin and alogliptin are being developed and have been approved for the treatment of type-2 diabetes. These agents may be used either as monotherapy for the treatment of type-2 diabetes or in combination with other anti-diabetic drugs. The present review highlights the use of linagliptin and other new (DPP-4) inhibitors in the management of type-2 diabetes. The review also highlights advantages, comparative pharmacokinetic, safety profile and other potential uses including potential newer indications of DPP-4 inhibitors and relevant patents. The other potential uses that are not restricted to diabetes include obesity, cardiovascular disease, neurological disease, hepatobiliary disease, wound healing, and other inflammatory illnesses.     

Comparative clinical pharmacokinetics of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors collectively comprise a presently unique form of disease management for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The aim of this review is to compare the clinical pharmacokinetics of available DPP-4 inhibitors (alogliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin and vildagliptin) for the purpose of identifying potential selection preferences according to individual patient variables and co-morbidities. DPP-4 inhibitors are readily absorbed orally. Following oral ingestion, absorption occurs mainly in the small intestine, with median times to maximum (peak) plasma concentration ranging from 1 to 3 hours. The fraction of each dose absorbed ranges from approximately 30% with linagliptin to 75-87% for all others. Numerical differences in maximum (peak) plasma drug concentrations and areas under the plasma concentration-time curve among the DPP-4 inhibitors vary by an order of magnitude. However, functional capacity measured in terms of glucose-lowering ability remains comparable among all available DPP-4 inhibitors. Distribution of DPP-4 inhibitors is strongly influenced by both lipophilicity and protein binding. Apparent volumes of distribution (V(d)) for most agents range from 70 to 300 L. Linagliptin exhibits a V(d) of more than 1000 L, indicating widespread distribution into tissues. Binding to target proteins in plasma and peripheral tissues exerts a major influence upon broadening linagliptin distribution. DPP-4 inhibitor metabolism is widely variable, with reported terminal half-lives ranging from approximately 3 to more than 200 hours. Complex relationships between rates of receptor binding and dissociation appear to strongly influence the durations of action of those DPP-4 inhibitors with comparatively shorter half-lives. Durations of activity often are not reflective of clearance and, with the exception of vildagliptin which may be administered either once daily in the evening or twice daily, these medications are effective when used with a once-daily dosing schedule. Saxagliptin and, to a lesser extent, sitagliptin are largely metabolized by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 3A5 isoforms. With the exception of the primary hydroxylated metabolite of saxagliptin, which is 2-fold less potent than its parent molecule, metabolic products of hepatic biotransformation are minimally active and none appreciably contribute to either the therapeutic or the toxic effects of DPP-4 inhibitors. No DPP-4 inhibitor has been shown to inhibit or to induce hepatic CYP-mediated drug metabolism. Accordingly, the number of clinically significant drug-drug interactions associated with these agents is minimal, with only saxagliptin necessitating dose adjustment if administered concurrently with medications that strongly inhibit CYP3A4. Linagliptin undergoes enterohepatic cycling with a large majority (85%) of the absorbed dose eliminated in faeces via biliary excretion. Other DPP-4 inhibitors predominantly undergo renal excretion, with 60-85% of each dose eliminated as unchanged parent compound in the urine. Systematic reviews of clinical trials suggest that the overall efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes generally is similar. Apart from these generalizations, pharmacokinetic distinctions that potentially influence product selection are tentative. When considered in total, data reviewed in this report suggest that the best overall balance between potency and the clinical pharmacokinetic characteristics of distribution, metabolism and elimination may be observed with linagliptin followed closely by vildagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin and alogliptin.     

Using DPP-4 inhibitors to modulate beta cell function in type 1 diabetes and in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease

Introduction: DPP-4 inhibitors have pleomorphic effects that extend beyond the anti-hyperglycemic labeled use of the drug. DPP-4 inhibitors have demonstrated promising renal protective effects in T2DM and T1DM and protective effects against immune destruction of pancreatic beta-cells in T1DM.

Areas covered: The efficacy of DPP-4 inhibitors in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease and possible adjunct with insulin in the treatment of T1DM to preserve beta-cell function. Pertinent literature was identified through Medline, PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov (1997-November 2018) using the search terms T1DM, sitagliptin, vildagliptin, linagliptin, beta-cell function, diabetic nephropathy. Only articles are written in the English language, and clinical trials evaluating human subjects were used.

Expert opinion: DPP-4 inhibitors can be used safely in patients with diabetic kidney disease and do not appear to exacerbate existing diabetic nephropathy. Linagliptin reduces albuminuria and protects renal endothelium from the deleterious effects of hyperglycemia. The effects of DPP-4 inhibitors on preserving beta-cell function in certain subtypes of T1DM [e.g. Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adult (LADA) and Slowly Progressive Type 1 Diabetes (SPIDDM)] are encouraging and show promise.     

DPP-4 inhibitors: focus on safety

Introduction: Dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitors (DPP-4-i) are highly selective inhibitors of the enzyme DPP-4. They act by increasing levels of incretin hormones, which have potent effects on insulin and glucagon release, gastric emptying, and satiety. Our goal is to review the safety issues related to DPP-4-i.

Areas covered: This review is based upon a PubMed search of the literature using keywords alogliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin and vildagliptin, DPP-4-i, glucagon-like polypeptide-1 agonists, as well as extensive personal clinical trial experience with each of these agents. The current DPP-4-i have very different chemical structures. Saxagliptin has significant cytochrome P450 metabolism and carries a risk of drug interactions. Linagliptin has primarily entero-hepatic excretion, a benefit in renally impaired patients. A concern arose related to congestive heart failure in the SAVOR TIMI trial of saxagliptin. Several major cardiac studies are underway, with two concluded. Despite lingering uncertainty related to pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, large randomized trials have not shown an increased risk with DPP-4-i treatment. Cutaneous adverse effects occur with a low frequency with some of these agents.

Expert opinion: DPP-4-i are an additional choice in the group of anti-hyperglycemics. Their principal advantage is a low incidence of hypoglycemia, making these agents desirable in patients such as the elderly and those with cardiac disease. Several large trials have hinted at less cardiac risk with DPP-4-i than with sulfonylureas. The CAROLINA Trial comparing linagliptin and glimepiride may provide a conclusive answer to this question.     

Effects of vildagliptin versus saxagliptin on daily acute glucose fluctuations in Chinese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea

Objective The present study aimed to compare the effects of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors vildagliptin and saxagliptin on 24?hour acute glucose fluctuations in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled with a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea.

Research design and methods This was a 24 week, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study. Patients (N?=?73) with T2DM who had inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c 7.0%–10.0%) with a stable dosage of metformin plus gliclazide for more than 3 months were randomized to receive either vildagliptin 50?mg twice daily (BID, n?=?37) or saxagliptin 5?mg once daily (QD, n?=?36). Change in mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) was assessed at the end of 24 weeks.

Results At baseline, the mean (±SD) age was 62.9?±?6.55 years, disease duration was 7.0?±?2.33 years, and HbA1c was 8.4?±?0.68%. After 24 weeks of treatment, the MAGE decreased from 5.81?±?1.16?mmol/L to 4.06?±?0.86?mmol/L (p<0.001) in the vildagliptin group and from 5.66?±?1.14?mmol/L to 4.79?±?1.25?mmol/L (p?=?0.003) in the saxagliptin group. The mean change in MAGE in the vildagliptin group was significantly greater than that in the saxagliptin group (1.74?±?0.48?mmol/L vs. 0.87?±?0.40?mmol/L, p<0.001). The mean change in HbA1c, from baseline to the study endpoint, in the vildagliptin and saxagliptin groups, was 1.22?±?0.40% and 1.07?±?0.36%, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (p?=?0.091). The overall safety and tolerability of vildagliptin and saxagliptin were similar. The limitations of the study were a small number of patients and open-label administration of the study drug.

Conclusion Vildagliptin produced a significantly greater reduction in acute glucose fluctuations compared with saxagliptin when added to a dual combination of metformin and sulfonylurea in Chinese patients with T2DM.

Chinese clinical trial registration number ChiCTR-TRC-13003858.     

影响患者利拉鲁肽降糖疗效因素的回顾分析

目的：为促进利拉鲁肽合理应用提供依据,回顾性分析影响2型糖尿病（type 2 diabetic mellitus,T2DM）患者使用利拉鲁肽降糖疗效的因素。方法：以华东医院2019年1月至2020年8月间使用利拉鲁肽的T2DM患者为研究对象,采用回顾性分析方法,观察和比较患者首次使用利拉鲁肽3个月及以上前后的糖化血红蛋白（HbA1c）、BMI （身体质量指数）和体质量的差异,分成疗效达标（治疗后HbA1c<7%或下降幅度>1%）和疗效未达标组。通过独立样本t检验和卡方检验分析组间基线数据差异,包括基本信息、检验指标,还有合并用药情况,Logistic回归法筛选出降糖疗效的影响因素。结果：在所有纳入研究的患者中,HbA1c、BMI和体质量指标分别下降（1.13±2.04）%、（0.77±1.48） kg·m^-2、（2.41±4.04） kg。140例（60.9%）患者达到预期的降糖目标,90例（39.1%）未达标。研究还发现2组患者的年龄、DM病程、体质量、性别和联用胰岛素的差异具有统计学意义（P=0.005、P=0.000、P=0.044、P=0.016、P=0.011）,Logistic回归分析显示年龄和联用胰岛素对利拉鲁肽降糖疗效影响有显著意义[P=0.004,OR=0.907,95% CI （0.848,0.969）;P=0.000,OR=0.151,95% CI （0.058,0.396）]。结论：首次使用利拉鲁肽时,患者的年龄、DM病程、体质量、性别和联用胰岛素与其降糖疗效达标相关,年龄和联用胰岛素是影响利拉鲁肽疗效的主要因素。临床个体化用药时,可评估以上因素对疗效的影响。