Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical assessment of temporomandibular joint pathology in ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate temporomandibular joint (TMJ) articular disc position and osseous degenerative changes using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as clinical symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: A sample of 43 patients with AS (38 males, age 45.9+/-10.7 years) and 16 controls (all male, age 41.3+/-6.3 years) were studied. All subjects completed a self-administered questionnaire and underwent clinical examination and MRI survey. Recorded variables included disease characteristics, subjective neck and TMJ disorder symptoms, and axial mobility measurements. MRI variables included TMJ disc position and severity of osseous degenerative change. RESULTS: TMJ disorder symptoms of headache duration and frequency, TMJ pain duration and frequency, and painful jaw movement were more frequent in patients with AS (p < 0.05). Significant differences were also observed in MRI indices for disc displacement (AS, 0.89; controls, 0.36; p = 0.005) and degenerative changes (AS, 0.55; controls, 0.06; p = 0.01). A total of 50 (62%) joints in the AS group had disc displacement compared to 11 (34%) joints in the controls. A total of 16 (20%) joints in the AS group had degenerative change compared to 2 (6%) joints in the controls. CONCLUSION: TMJ internal derangement, degenerative changes, and subjective pain complaints are frequent in patients with AS. Physicians should be aware of potential TMJ involvement in these patients, which may require specific assessment and therapy.     

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of spinal inflammation in patients treated for ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE: To compare different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based algorithms for assessment of spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) being treated with disease modifying drugs. METHODS: Eleven patients (10 men, 1 woman) who fulfilled modified New York diagnostic criteria and had severe disease [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) > 4] were given intravenous infusion of infliximab (Remicade, 5 mg/kg) for 96 weeks. Whole-spine MRI was done at 0, 24, and 54 weeks. Measurements of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal MRI Activity Score (ASspiMRI), paravertebral inflammatory lesion count (pILC), contrast:noise ratio (CNR) measurements of defined inflammatory lesions, and other scores together with C-reactive protein concentration were made at each visit. Examinations were anonymized and randomly presented twice to 2 radiologists. The significance of any changes in scores, their correlation with the BASDAI, and interobserver and intraobserver correlations were calculated. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) BASDAI improved from 7.2 (+/- 1.5) to 1.3 (+/- 0.9) after 54 weeks (p < 0.001), and the ASspiMRI score improved from 12.0 (+/- 8.0) to 0.2 (+/- 0.5) (p < 0.001). Correlations between ASspiMRI score and BASDAI were 0.831, 0.746, and 0.369 (p < 0.001 each). The pILC improved significantly (p < 0.01). CNR showed no correlation with any clinical score. CONCLUSION:The ASspiMRI score performed best for assessment and quantification of spinal inflammation and disease activity in patients with AS, but should also quantify paravertebral inflammatory lesions, since we could show that this will significantly improve its correlation to clinical scores and increase its sensitivity to mild inflammatory processes.     

Magnetic resonance imaging of arachnoid diverticula associated with cauda equina syndrome in ankylosing spondylitis

Cauda equina syndrome is an uncommon complication of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), but results in significant morbidity in those patients affected. We report 2 patients who developed classical cauda equina syndrome, which was well visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. This technique allows accurate noninvasive diagnosis of this complication of AS.     

Value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis

The objective of this study is to estimate the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the detection of abnormalities in sacroiliac joints in the patients with early ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and investigate the feasibility of whole-body DWI (WB-DWI) in systemic evaluation of AS. Sixteen patients with early AS, 18 patients with simple low back pain (LBP), and 18 healthy volunteers were involved in this study. All subjects underwent conventional MRI and DWI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in subchondral bone marrows of sacroiliac joints was measured. Independent-sample t test was used to statistically analyze the difference of ADC values between groups. WB-DWI was performed in additional 12 patients with clinically confirmed AS. The image results were analyzed by multiple post-processing techniques, as compared to conventional MRI. In AS patients, mean ADC values were (0.494?±?0.170)?×?10^?3?mm²/s in sacrum and (0.513?±?0.129)?×?10^?3?mm²/s in ilium, which were significantly higher than those of LBP ((0.306?±?0.057)?×?10^?3?mm²/s in sacrum and (0.323?±?0.083)?×?10^?3?mm²/s in ilium) and healthy volunteers ((0.315?±?0.009)?×?10^?3?mm²/s in sacrum and (0.319?±?0.012)?×?10^?3?mm²/s in ilium). No statistical differences were found between simple LBP and healthy volunteers. Mean ADC value of multiple lesions in AS was (0.932?±?0.299)?×?10^?3?mm²/s. By WB-DWI, abnormal signals of sacroiliac joints and extra-sacroiliac joint lesions were demonstrated in the locations corresponding with clinical findings. Mean ADC values of multiple lesions were (1.298?±?0.323)?×?10^?3?mm²/s in sacrum and (1.216?±?0.311)?×?10^?3?mm²/s in ilium. DWI and WB-DWI were shown to be effective in differentiation and systemic evaluation of early AS. Both techniques are likely to play an importance role in the early diagnosis of AS and assessment of treatment response.     

Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine and the sacroiliac joints in ankylosing spondylitis and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis during treatment with etanercept

OBJECTIVE: To assess the changes in inflammatory lesions of the spine and the sacroiliac (SI) joints as detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis (uSpA) with predominant axial symptoms during treatment with etanercept. METHODS: MRI of the spine and/or the SI joints of patients with active AS or axial uSpA was performed at baseline (TP0, n = 25), after 6 weeks (TP1, n = 20), and after 24 weeks of continuous treatment with etanercept (TP2, n = 12). T1 weighted spin echo pre -(T1), post-gadolinium (T1/Gd-DTPA) and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) MRI sequences were used to assess chronic and active spinal lesions using the scoring system ASspiMRI. Active and chronic SI lesions were assessed using a simple scoring system. RESULTS: By use of the definite STIR sequence, significant regression of spinal inflammation was already seen already after 6 weeks in the patients treated with etanercept (mean (SD) 11.2 (13.8) at TP0 v 6.8 (7.9) at TP1; p = 0.023) but not in patients treated with placebo. Continuous treatment with etanercept for 24 weeks reduced active spinal changes by 69% (p = 0.012). T1/Gd-DTPA sequences gave similar results. There was only a trend for a decrease of active inflammatory lesions of the SI joints. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept treatment in patients with active AS and uSpA leads to regression of active inflammatory lesions of the spine as depicted by MRI. The potential role of etanercept on deceleration of chronic spinal changes needs further study.     

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of spinal inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis: Standard clinical protocols may omit inflammatory lesions in thoracic vertebrae

Objective

Radiologic assessment of spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) relies primarily on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although little is known about the distribution of inflammatory lesions within the structures of the spine. Our objective was to compare the distribution of inflammatory lesions centrally and laterally within the thoracic and lumbar spine vertebral bodies.

Methods

We studied 49 patients with AS who were scanned with STIR and T1‐weighted spin‐echo MRI of the whole spine. Scans were read by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists, with a third reader as the arbitrator. Controls included 6 age‐matched individuals. We recorded bone marrow edema on STIR images from each vertebral body, separately identifying central and lateral slices. The latter were defined as images that included or were lateral to the pedicle. Interreader reproducibility was assessed by kappa statistics.

Results

Inflammation was present in 263 (45%) of 588 thoracic and 86 (35%) of 245 lumbar vertebrae; the mean number of affected thoracic and lumbar vertebrae per patient were 5.4 and 1.8, respectively. Inflammation was present in the lateral aspect of 219 (37%) of 588 thoracic vertebrae and 45 (18%) of 245 lumbar vertebrae (P < 0.001). Lesions were more common laterally than centrally for all thoracic vertebrae except for T7. Involvement of only the lateral slices was observed in as many as 19.6% of thoracic vertebrae.

Conclusion

Evaluation of spinal inflammation by MRI may omit lesions in up to 20% of inflamed thoracic vertebrae if both scanning and image assessment do not include sagittal slices that extend to the lateral edges of all vertebrae.     

Discovertebral lesion in ankylosing spondylitis: differential diagnosis with discitis by magnetic resonance imaging

 Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is occasionally accompanied by erosive changes in the vertebral endplate at one or more restricted levels (Andersson lesions). The radiographic findings of this lesion are similar to those of bacterial discitis, and a differential diagnosis between them is often difficult. These diseases must be diagnosed correctly because they require different treatments. In order to evaluate the prevalence of Andersson lesions in the Japanese population, we examined 31 cases of AS which were treated in our department, and Andersson lesions were found in three (9.7%) of them. All these three cases developed Andersson lesions in the earlier phase of the AS, and differentiating the lesions from bacterial discitis was difficult. The details of these three cases are reviewed, and the importance of differentiating between Andersson lesions and bacterial discitis is discussed. Plain radiographs showed no clear difference between these conditions, but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was found to be more efficient. Received: February 5, 2001 / Accepted: September 27, 2001     

Efficacy of anakinra in active ankylosing spondylitis: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of anakinra, an interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in active ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and to investigate the effect of anakinra treatment on spinal enthesitis/osteitis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A 3 month open label study of anakinra (100 mg subcutaneous injection daily) was carried out in nine patients with active AS who had back pain and an increased acute phase response, and who had failed to respond to at least one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Clinical assessment included the Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and AS Quality of Life (ASQoL) before and after treatment. Fat suppressed MRI of the spine and sacroiliac joints was performed with a 1.5 T scanner at baseline and at 3 months to determine the effect of treatment on spinal enthesitis/osteitis. RESULTS: Significant improvement was found in the BASFI (median baseline 5.88, 3 months 3.63, p = 0.021), BASDAI (median baseline 5.63, 3 months 3.48, p = 0.028), ASQoL (median baseline 12, 3 months 8, p = 0.011) and laboratory measures reflecting inflammation, with C reactive protein (median baseline 31 mg/l, 3 months 17 mg/l, p = 0.036) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (median baseline 19 mm/1st h, 3 months 15 mm/1st h, p = 0.008) also showing significant improvement. Six patients (67%) achieved the Assessments in AS (ASAS) Working Group criteria of 20% improvement. Of the 38 regions of enthesitis/osteitis determined by MRI at baseline, 23 (61%) either improved or regressed completely. CONCLUSIONS: This open label pilot study suggests that anakinra is effective in controlling the clinical manifestations of AS. The clinical response was reflected by an improvement in MRI determined spinal enthesitis/osteitis.     

Andersson lesions of whole spine magnetic resonance imaging compared with plain radiography in ankylosing spondylitis

The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of Andersson lesions using whole spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with plain radiography in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A total of 62 patients with AS who had undergone whole spine MRI and plain radiography were retrospectively enrolled in this study. We compared the number of discovertebral units (DVUs) with Andersson lesions with clinical and radiographic indices such as erythrocyte sediment rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). Fifty-three patients (85.5 %) by whole spine MRI and 23 patients (37.1 %) by plain radiography had at least one Andersson lesion. We found 129 DVUs with Andersson lesions (11.1 %) by MRI and 35 DVUs by plain radiography over all the spine levels. Andersson lesions by MRI were most commonly detected at the lower thoracic spine (from T7-8 to T12-L1). Among the 151 total Andersson lesions by whole spine MRI, 41 were identified as central disc type, 26 as anterior peripheral disc type, 44 as posterior peripheral disc type, and 40 as diffuse disc type. However, the number of Andersson lesions did not correlate with ESR, CRP, BASDAI, BASFI, or mSASSS (p > 0.05 for all). Our study indicates that the presence of Andersson lesions in patients with AS is clearly underestimated. MRI is a superior technique for detecting early Andersson lesions compared with plain radiography.     

Cauda equina syndrome complicating ankylosing spondylitis: Role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Summary We present two cases of cauda equina syndrome in ankylosing spondylitis. Cauda equina syndrome is a rare complication of ankylosing spondylitis, the pathogenesis of which is not well understood. The onset is insidious with pain and sensory symptoms; sphincter disturbances are common. After a period of increasing neurological symptoms, the condition tends to stabilize. The degree of nerve involvement is variable and can be accurately defined by electromyography. The diagnosis has to be confirmed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); myelography must be avoided. There is no specific treatment, except for pain control.The different clinical presentations and the role of new imaging techniques, CT and MRI, are demonstrated.     

Magnetic resonance imaging in the complex radiation diagnosis of tuberculous spondylitis in adults]

The paper analyzes X-ray study and MR imaging of 36 adult patients with tuberculosis spondylosis having an active process developed in maturity (n = 20) and sequelae of childhood spondylitis (n = 16). X-ray study is shown to retain its basic value in the diagnosis of spondylitis. MRI is the optimum technique for early diagnosis of inflammatory changes in the spine and soft tissues, the method of choice in neurological disorders.     

Early-stage hip involvement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A Chinese study based on magnetic resonance imaging

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and identify potential factors of the early-stage hip involvement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) based on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study of 655 consecutive patients was performed. Patients with hip pain or limited hip function but lacking definitive evidence of hip involvement on radiography underwent hip MRI. Based on the results of the imaging tests, the patients were classified into three categories: (1) no hip involvement; (2) early-stage hip involvement according to MRI but not radiography; (3) advanced-stage hip involvement according to a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index-hip score ≥2.

Results: One hundred and sixty-eight patients had early-stage hip involvement and 103 patients had advanced-stage hip involvement. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that younger age at onset, worse BASMI score, and more active inflammation in the sacroiliac joints were associated with the occurrence of early-stage hip involvement.

Conclusion: Negative plain radiography results cannot be used to rule out hip involvement. MRI was superior to radiography for the detection of early-stage hip involvement. Susceptible AS patients with symptoms or risk factors for hip involvement should undergo hip MRI to test for lesions in the early stage.     

Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada magnetic resonance imaging index for assessment of spinal inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE: To develop a feasible magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based scoring system for spinal inflammation in patients with spondylarthropathy that requires minimal scan time, does not require contrast enhancement, evaluates the extent of lesions in 3 dimensional planes, and limits the number of vertebral levels that are scored because MRI demonstrates characteristic inflammatory lesions in the spine of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) prior to the development of typical features on plain radiographic. METHODS: Our scoring method was based entirely on the assessment of increased signal denoting bone marrow edema on T2-weighted STIR sequences. Blinded MRI films were assessed in random order at 2 sites by 3 blinded readers at each of the 2 sites (the Universities of Alberta and Toronto). Intra- and interreader reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient. The 24-week response of patients with AS randomized to infliximab:placebo (8:3) was assessed by effect size and standardized response mean. RESULTS: An initial analysis of all discovertebral units (DVUs) in the spine of 11 patients demonstrated a mean of 3.2 (95% confidence interval 3.2, 5.2) affected units, while limiting the scoring to a maximum of 6 units captured most of the affected units. We scanned 11 patients with AS with clinically active disease and 20 additional patients randomized to a 24-week trial of either infliximab or placebo. Intraobserver reproducibility for the 6-DVU STIR score ranged from 0.93 to 0.98 (P < 0.0001). Interobserver reproducibility of scores by readers from both sites was 0.79 (P < 0.0001) for status score and 0.82 (P < 0.0001) for change score. Analysis of pretreatment and posttreatment scores for all 20 patients randomized to infliximab/placebo showed a large degree of responsiveness (standardized response mean = 0.87). Reproducibility and responsiveness were only slightly improved by using contrast enhancement with gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. CONCLUSION: The Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI index is a feasible, reproducible, and responsive index for measuring spinal inflammation in AS.     

Inflammation on spinal magnetic resonance imaging is associated with poor bone quality in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association between inflammatory lesions on spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and trabecular bone score (TBS) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods: Ninety-seven patients with AS underwent spine MRI and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine to measure TBS and bone mineral density (BMD). Bone marrow edema (BME) on MRI was considered an inflammatory lesion. The presence, depth (>1?cm), and intensity of BME on MRI were scored for the 1st–4th lumbar spine segments. Inflammatory markers and spinal structural damage scores at the time of MRI examination were recorded. The association between inflammatory activity score on MRI and TBS was evaluated.

Results: Among the 97 patients, 52 had BME on spinal MRI (L1–L4). The mean TBS values were 1.38?±?0.11 and 1.43?±?0.11 for patients with and without BME, respectively (p?=?.022). Total inflammatory activity scores on spinal MRI correlated negatively with TBS, but not with BMD. Patients with a TBS value representing a high fracture risk had more deep BME (>1?cm) (p?=?.048) on MRI. After adjustment for age, symptom duration, and lumbar spinal structural damage, the TBS decreased as inflammation severity on MRI increased (p?=?.026).

Discussion: In AS patients, inflammation on spinal MRI was negatively correlated with TBS. The severity of local bone inflammation in the spine was associated with poor bone quality. These findings suggest that the control of active bone inflammation may be effective for preventing osteoporosis in AS patients.     

Scoring inflammatory activity of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging in ankylosing spondylitis: a multireader experiment

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine is increasingly important in the assessment of inflammatory activity in clinical trials with patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We investigated feasibility, inter-reader reliability, sensitivity to change, and discriminatory ability of 3 different scoring methods for MRI activity and change in activity of the spine in patients with AS. METHODS: Thirty sets of spinal MRI at baseline and after 24 weeks of followup, derived from a randomized clinical trial comparing a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking drug (n = 20) with placebo (n = 10) and selected to cover a wide range of activity at baseline and change in activity, were presented electronically in a partial latin-square design to 9 experienced readers from different countries (Europe, Canada). Readers scored each set of MRI 3 times, using 3 different methods including the Ankylosing Spondylitis spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging-activity [ASspiMRI-a, grading activity (0-6) per vertebral unit in 23 units]; the Berlin modification of the ASspiMRI-a; and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scoring system, which scores the 6 vertebral units considered by the reader as the most abnormal, with additional scores for "depth" and "intensity." Both the order of the methods used by each reader and the timepoints (before/after treatment) were randomized. Feasibility of each scoring system was evaluated by measuring the mean time needed to score each set of MRI, and inter-reader reliability was evaluated by smallest detectable change (SDC) and by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for all readers together and for all possible reader pairs separately. Sensitivity to change was investigated by calculating Guyatt's effect size on change scores. Discriminatory ability was assessed using Z-scores (Mann-Whitney test) comparing change in score between patients treated with TNF-blocking drug and placebo. RESULTS: The mean time to score one set of MRI was shortest for the Berlin method. SDC was lowest for the Berlin method and highest for SPARCC. Overall inter-reader ICC per method were between 0.49 and 0.77 for scoring activity status, and between 0.46 and 0.72 for scoring activity change. ICC for all possible reader pairs showed much more fluctuation per method, with lowest observed values of about 0.05 (very low agreement) and highest observed values over 0.90 (excellent agreement). In general, ICC for SPARCC were consistently higher than for other systems. Sensitivity to change differed per reader, and was more consistent with SPARCC than with the other methods, but was in general excellent for all 3 methods. Discrimination between groups (TNF-blocker vs placebo) assessed by Z-scores was good and comparable among methods. CONCLUSION: This experiment demonstrates the feasibility of multiple-reader MRI scoring exercises for method comparison, provides evidence for the feasibility, reliability, sensitivity to change, and discriminatory capacity of all 3 tested scoring systems to be used in assessing spinal activity on MRI in patients with AS in clinical trials. On the basis of these results it is not possible to prioritize one of the 3 methods.     

Systematic assessment of inflammation by magnetic resonance imaging in the posterior elements of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis

Objective

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sensitive for scoring inflammatory lesions in the spine, but attention has primarily focused on vertebral bodies, and no study has systematically examined the posterior elements. We aimed to systematically determine the frequency and distribution of inflammatory changes in the posterior elements of the spine using MRI, and to assess the reliability of their detection and their impact on discrimination of spinal MRI.

Methods

We scanned 32 patients recruited to placebo‐controlled trials of anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy. Inflammatory lesions were detected by systematic review of consecutive sagittal STIR slices of the entire spine. Two readers evaluated pretreatment and posttreatment scans, blinded to treatment and time point. Inflammation was scored dichotomously (present/absent) in each posterior structure. Reproducibility was assessed by calculating random model variance components and generalizability coefficients, and discrimination by using Guyatt's effect size.

Results

Most patients (87.5%) had ≥1 lesion in the posterior elements (mean ± SD number of affected spinal levels per patient 6.7 ± 5.3), and they were detected most frequently in the thoracic spine. Interobserver reproducibility for total lesion count was very good to excellent for lesions in the thoracic spine and transverse and spinous processes. The addition of a simple dichotomous method for scoring posterior element inflammation substantially enhanced the discrimination observed using established MRI methods for scoring vertebral body inflammation.

Conclusion

Inflammatory lesions in the posterior elements were present in the majority of patients with AS, and standard MRI protocols of the spine should be modified to ensure adequate visualization of posterolateral structures.     

Spondyloarthritis research Consortium of Canada magnetic resonance imaging index for assessment of sacroiliac joint inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE: To develop a feasible magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based scoring system for sacroiliac joint inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) that requires minimal scan time, does not require contrast enhancement, evaluates lesions separately at each articular surface, and limits the number of sacroiliac images that are scored. METHODS: A scoring method based on the assessment of increased signal denoting bone marrow edema on T2-weighted STIR sequences was used. MRI films were assessed blindly in random order at 2 sites by multiple readers. Intra- and interreader reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); the 24-week response of patients with AS randomized to placebo:infliximab (3:8) was assessed by effect size and standardized response mean. The reliability and responsiveness of the scoring method were compared for STIR and gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic (Gd-DTPA)-enhanced MRI sequences. RESULTS: We scanned 11 patients with AS with clinically active disease and 11 additional patients randomized to the trial of infliximab therapy. ICC for total sacroiliac joint STIR score ranged from 0.90 to 0.98 (P < 0.00001) and interobserver ICC for combined readers from the 2 sites was 0.84 (P < 0.0001). ICC for change scores was lower for STIR (ICC 0.53) than for Gd-DTPA-enhanced sequences (ICC 0.79). Responsiveness was poor, although fusion was evident in one-third of patients who received treatment (placebo:infliximab) and inflammation scores were low. CONCLUSION: The Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI index is a feasible and reproducible index for measuring sacroiliac joint inflammation in patients with AS.     

Osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder, characterized by an inflammatory enthesopathy progressing to ossification and ankylosis. Osteoporosis is a well‐reported complication of AS. Bone loss begins early in the disease at the spine, and later progresses to the hip. This reduction in bone density leads to an increased risk of fractures. However, there is a lack of awareness regarding this common complication, thus adding to the morbidity associated with AS. Early recognition, appropriate assessment and timely treatment of this complication will help reduce the attendant fracture risk due to decreased bone mass.