Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings.

PURPOSE: To correlate histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic appearance in primary and locally recurrent breast carcinoma after breast-conservation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records and mammographic findings were retrospectively reviewed; 26 patients with 27 local recurrences after breast-conservation therapy were identified. RESULTS: Primary histopathologic findings included six in situ and 20 invasive carcinomas. Of the 27 recurrences, 19 (70%) were at or adjacent to the lumpectomy site and eight (30%) were elsewhere in the breast. All primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) cases manifested mammographically as microcalcifications and recurred as DCIS with microcalcifications. Eleven primary invasive carcinomas (10 masses, one case of microcalcifications) were detected only mammographically, three were detected only with physical examination, and six (six masses) were detected with both. Among these 20 recurrences, 14 (five masses, nine cases of microcalcifications) were detected only mammographically, one was detected only with physical examination, and five (five masses) were detected with both. Seventeen (85%) of 20 primary invasive carcinomas recurred invasively: 16 (94%) with similar histopathologic findings and eight (47%) with similar mammographic findings. CONCLUSION: In local recurrence after breast-conservation therapy for DCIS, histopathologic findings, detection method, and mammographic findings are usually similar. Histopathologic findings of primary invasive breast carcinoma and local recurrence are usually similar, but the detection method and mammographic findings vary. This is relevant to the interpretation of new clinical or mammographic findings following lumpectomy.     

Comparison of preoperative simultaneous stereotactic fine needle aspiration biopsy and stereotactic core needle biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative results of stereotactic fine needle aspiration biopsy (S-FNAB) with stereotactic core needle biopsy (S-CNB) performed simultaneously in breast lesions with the postoperative histopathological diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of all histological grades. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 733 consecutive stereotactic biopsies were performed between May 1993 and June 1999. In 72 patients with mammographic findings suspicious of malignancy who were subjected to breast surgery, postoperative histopathology showed DCIS. Preoperatively, S-FNAB and S-CNB had been done simultaneously in all patients, S-FNAB with spinal needle 0.7 or 0.9 mm and S-CNB was performed with an automated 2.1-mm biopsy gun. An average of 3 S-FNABs and 3 S-CNBs were performed in each patient. RESULTS: In 56 (78%) of the 72 patients S-CNB showed DCIS. In 3 patients (4%) the S-CNB revealed "probable carcinoma", in 7 patients (10%) "atypia" and in 6, the lesions were benign. In 34 (47%) of the 72 women S-FNABs showed carcinoma, not otherwise specified. In 6 cases (8%) the S-FNABs showed "probable carcinoma" and in 12 patients (17%) "atypia"; 8 lesions were benign and 12 not diagnostic. CONCLUSION: S-CNB was superior to S-FNAB in diagnosing DCIS. Only 6 patients (8%) received a benign or non-diagnostic preoperative diagnosis with S-CNB compared to 20 patients (28%) with S-FNAB. S-CNB was superior to S-FNAB for preoperative diagnosis of DCIS, but S-FNAB could further increase the sensitivity of the biopsy since it diagnosed cancer in 4 cases where S-CNB showed benign material.     

Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification

AIM: To identify pre-operative factors which predict presence of invasive disease within mammographically detected malignant microcalcification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 116 serial stereotactic core needle biopsies (SCNBs) performed on malignant mammographic calcification. Final surgical pathology was correlated with pre-operative features (clinical, radiological and core histology) in an attempt to predict the presence of an invasive component. RESULTS: Thirty-eight clusters contained invasive carcinoma. The sensitivity of SCNB for invasion was 55%. Clinical features, calcium morphology and cluster size were not shown to be predictive of invasive disease. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of high grade on core histology and increasing number of calcifications were predictive of increased risk of invasion (high grade core biopsy DCIS and > 40 calcifications 48% invasive at surgical histology; high grade core biopsy DCIS and < 40 calcifications 15% invasive; non-high grade core biopsy DCIS 0% invasive). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of those clusters diagnosed as DCIS by percutaneous biopsy which are likely to harbour an invasive component is possible. It would seem reasonable to consider staging the axilla at therapeutic surgery in these patients.     

Radial sclerosing lesion of the breast: mammographic features

The authors present the clinical, mammographic, and pathologic findings in seven patients with radial sclerosing lesions (RSLs) who had a nonpalpable stellate lesion at mammography. Although the radiographic findings were suggestive of RSL in six of seven patients, diagnostic excisional biopsy was recommended for all. One RSL had associated microcalcifications localized in contiguous adenosis. The authors did not find this a useful criterion to differentiate RSL from carcinoma. Similarly, the presence of either a lucent or dense central core was not radiographically diagnostic. Surgical excision of these stellate lesions is therefore required.     

BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.

PURPOSE: To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories 0, 2, 3, 4, and 5 by using BI-RADS terminology and by auditing data on needle localizations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 1991 and December 1996, 1,400 mammographically guided needle localizations were performed in 1,109 patients. Information entered into the mammographic database included where the initial mammography was performed (inside vs outside the institution), BI-RADS category, mammographic finding, and histopathologic findings. A recorded recommendation was available for 1,312 localizations in 1,097 patients, who composed the study population. RESULTS: The 1,312 localizations yielded 449 (34%) cancers (139 [31%] were ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]; 310 [69%] were invasive cancers) and 863 (66%) benign lesions. There were 15 (1%) category 0 lesions; the PPV was 13% (two of 15 lesions). There were 50 (4%) category 2 lesions; the PPV was 0% (0 of 40 lesions). There were 141 (11%) category 3 lesions; the PPV was 2% (three of 141 lesions). The three cancers in this group were all non-comedotype DCIS. There were 936 (71%) category 4 lesions; the PPV was 30% (279 of 936 lesions). There were 170 (13%) category 5 lesions; the PPV was 97% (165 of 170 lesions). CONCLUSION: Placing mammographic lesions into BI-RADS categories is useful for predicting the presence of malignancy. Perhaps, most important, a lesion placed into BI-RADS category 3 is highly predictive of benignity, and short-term interval follow-up as an alternative to biopsy would decrease the number of biopsies performed in benign lesions.     

Magnetic resonance imaging of radial sclerosing lesions (radial scars) of the breast

Purpose

To identify magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) features of radial sclerosing lesions (RSLs) of the breast.

Methods and materials

The radiologic and pathologic records for 4629 consecutive patients undergoing MR examinations of the breast were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received a pathologic diagnosis of RSL without atypia or carcinoma at surgical excision were identified. The MR images were evaluated according to the BI-RADS-MRI lexicon by two experienced breast radiologists. The frequency of morphologic and kinetic patterns and of BI-RADS-MRI assessment categories was calculated.

Results

Twenty-nine patients with 29 surgically excised RSL were identified.Nine (31%) RSL were MR-occult; the remaining 20 (69%) RSL presented as masses (10/20, 50%), architectural distortions (5/20, 25%), non-mass lesions (4/20, 20%), and focus (1/20, 5%). Kinetic analysis was performed in 18 RSL: enhancement features were benign in 9 (50%) cases, suspicious in 7 (39%) cases and indeterminate in 2 (11%) cases. Twelve (41%) MR examinations were assessed as suspicious (BI-RADS-MRI 4 and 5), and 17 (59%) as negative (BI-RADS-MRI 1) or benign (BI-RADS-MRI 2 and 3).

Conclusion

RSLs are often visualized on MR imaging. Just as in mammography and sonography, RSL can have variable morphologic and kinetic features, and not infrequently they can mimic invasive carcinoma of the breast.     

Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine frequency of invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at excisional biopsy in women with atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) at percutaneous core-needle biopsy (CNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of results in 6,081 consecutive patients who underwent CNB at two institutions revealed that in 35 (0.58%), LCIS (n = 15) or ALH (n = 20) was the pathologic finding with highest risk. Patient age range was 41-84 years (mean, 59 years). Of 35 patients, 26 (74%) underwent excisional biopsy and nine (26%) underwent mammographic follow-up for longer than 2 years. Lesions with a pathologic upgrade were noted when invasive cancer or DCIS occurred at the CNB site. CNB results in patients with a diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (75 of 6,081 [1.2%]) were reviewed; these patients underwent subsequent excisional biopsy. Statistical comparison of frequency of upgrading of lesions in patients with a diagnosis of LCIS or ALH at CNB and in those with a diagnosis of ADH at CNB was performed (Pearson chi(2) test). RESULTS: In six (17%) of 35 (95% CI: 4.7%, 29.6%) patients, lesions were upgraded to DCIS (n = 4) or invasive cancer (n = 2). In 15 patients with LCIS diagnosed at CNB, lesions in four (27%) were upgraded to either DCIS or invasive cancer. In 20 patients with ALH diagnosed at CNB, lesions were upgraded to DCIS in two (10%). Lesions in nine patients who underwent mammographic follow-up were stable. No mammographic or technical findings distinguished patients with upgraded lesions from those whose lesions were not upgraded. In 12 (16%) of 75 (95% CI: 7.7%, 24.3%) patients with ADH, lesions were upgraded. Difference between the upgrade rate in patients with LCIS or ALH and that in those with ADH was not significant (P =.88). CONCLUSION: Lesions in 17% of patients with LCIS or ALH at CNB were upgraded to invasive cancer or DCIS; this rate was similar to the upgrade rate in patients with ADH. Excisional biopsy is supported when LCIS, ALH, or ADH is diagnosed at CNB.     

Proliferative high-risk lesions of the breast: contribution and limits of US-guided core biopsy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively correlate high-risk proliferative breast lesions (radial scar, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and papillary lesions) diagnosed on core biopsy with the definitive histopathological diagnosis obtained after surgical excision or with the follow-up, in order to assess the role of core biopsy in such lesions. To discuss the management of the patient after a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 74 out of 1776 core biopsies consecutively performed on 67 patients. The histopathologic findings were as follows: 11 radial scars (RS), 3 atypical lobular hyperplasias (ALH), 3 lobular carcinomas in situ (LCIS), 57 benign papillary lesions. All patients underwent bilateral mammography, whole-breast ultrasound with a linear-array broadband transducer, and core biopsy with a 14 Gauge needle and a mean number of samples of 5 (range 4-7). Sixty-two of 67 patients, for a total of 69/74 lesions, underwent surgical biopsy despite benign histopathologic findings, mostly because of highly suspicious imaging for malignancy (BIRADS 4-5), whereas 5 patients refused surgery and have been followed up for a least 18 months and are still being followed up (2 with RS, 1 with ADH and 2 with papillary lesions). RESULTS: Among the core biopsied lesions with a diagnosis of RS (n = 11) pathology revealed one ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (this case was characterized by granular microcalcifications on mammography and by a mass with irregular margins on ultrasound). Also in the group of ADH (n = 3) pathology revealed one DCIS (lesion not visible on mammography but depicted as a suspicious mass on US). In the group of LCIS (n = 3) pathologists found an invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Among the benign papillary lesions (n = 57) histopathologic analysis of the surgical specimen revealed 7 malignant lesions (4 papillary carcinomas and 3 DCIS), whose mammographic and ultrasound findings were indistinguishable from benign lesions. Altogether there were 10 false negative results (underestimation) out of 74 core biopsies with a diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions. CONCLUSION: The high rate of histological underestimation after core biopsy (10/74) (13.5%) demands a very careful management of patents with a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions, especially in the case of RS, lobular neoplasia and papillary lesions. However, the high imaging suspicion for malignancy prompts surgery. It is possible to assume that, when there is a low imaging suspicion for malignancy, when enough tissue has been sampled for pathology and no atypia is found within the lesions, surgery is not mandatory but a very careful follow-up is recommended. We must underline that there is no agreement regarding the quantity of tissue to sample. Vacuum-assisted biopsy may lead to better results, although there is as yet no proof that it can actually replace surgery in this group of lesions, since it seems only to reduce but not abolish the histological underestimation.     

Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of papillary lesions, radial scars, or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy (SCNB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 1,236 lesions sampled with SCNB yielded 22 papillary lesions, nine radial scars, and five LCIS lesions. Diffuse lesions such as papillomatosis, papillary ductal hyperplasia, papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and atypical lobular hyperplasia were not included. The mammographic findings, associated histologic features, and outcome were assessed for each case. RESULTS: Sixteen papillary lesions were diagnosed as benign at SCNB. Of these, five were benign at excision, and 10 were unremarkable at mammographic follow-up. At excision of an unusual lesion containing a microscopic papillary lesion, DCIS was found. Three of four papillary lesions suspicious at SCNB proved to be papillary carcinomas; the fourth had no residual carcinoma at excision. Eight of nine radial scars were excised, which revealed atypical hyperplasia in four scars but no malignancies. One LCIS lesion was found at excision to contain DCIS. CONCLUSION: Benign or malignant papillary lesions were accurately diagnosed with SCNB in the majority of cases. Cases diagnosed as suspicious for malignancy or with atypia or unusual associated histologic findings should be excised. No malignancies were found at excision of radial scars diagnosed at SCNB. Surgical removal of these lesions following SCNB may not be routinely necessary. DCIS was found in one lesion diagnosed as LCIS at SCNB, which suggests that removal of these lesions may be prudent.     

A comparison of 14 and 12 gauge needles for core biopsy of suspicious mammographic calcification

This study was carried out to compare the efficacy of 14 vs 12 G needles in stereotactic core biopsy of mammographic calcification. A consecutive series of 100 impalpable mammographic calcifications, without an associated mass and requiring stereotactic core biopsy were randomly allocated to either 14 G or 12 G needle sampling. All biopsies were performed using an upright stereotactic digital unit (Senovision GE) and a Bard automated biopsy gun. Core biopsy results were categorized as either normal, benign, atypical ductal hyperplasia, suspicious of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), DCIS or invasive cancer. The radiographic calcification retrieval rates, complete and absolute sensitivity for malignancy of DCIS and DCIS with an invasive focus were obtained by comparison of core results with surgical histology. Radiographic calcification retrieval was achieved in 86% when using 14 G and 12 G needles. The absolute sensitivity and complete sensitivity for diagnosing DCIS were the same with 12 G and 14 G needles (72% versus 71% and 93% versus 94%, respectively). The use of 12 G needles does not appear to confer benefit over the use of 14 G needles in the diagnosis of mammographic calcification.     

Underestimation of the presence of breast carcinoma in papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core-needle biopsy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the degree of underestimation of breast carcinoma diagnosis in papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core-needle biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and waiver of informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Mammographic database review (1994-2003) revealed core biopsy diagnoses of benign papilloma (n=38), atypical papilloma (n=15), sclerotic papilloma (n=6), and micropapilloma (n=4) in 57 women (mean age, 57 years). Excisional or mammographic follow-up (>or=2 years) findings were available. Patients with in situ or invasive cancer in the same breast or patients without follow-up were excluded. Findings were collected from mammography, ultrasonography, core technique, core biopsy, excision, and subsequent mammography. Reference standard was excisional findings or follow-up mammogram with no change at 2 years. Associations were examined with regression methods. RESULTS: In 38 of 63 lesions, surgical excision was performed; in 25 additional lesions (considered benign), follow-up mammography (24-month minimum) was performed, with no interval change. In 15 lesions, 14-gauge core needle was used; in 48, vacuum assistance (mean cores per lesion, 8.7). Carcinoma was found at excision in 14 of 38 lesions. Core pathologic findings associated with malignancy were benign papilloma (n=1), sclerotic papilloma (n=1), micropapilloma (n=2), and atypical papilloma (n=10). Frequency of malignancy was one (3%) of 38 benign papillomas, 10 (67%) of 15 atypical papillomas, two (50%) of four micropapillomas, and one (17%) of six sclerotic papillomas. Excisional findings included lobular carcinoma in situ (n=2), ductal carcinoma in situ (n=7), papillary carcinoma (n=2), and invasive ductal carcinoma (n=3). Low-risk group (micropapillomas and sclerotic and benign papillomas) was compared with high-risk atypical papilloma group. Core findings were associated with malignancy at excision for atypical papilloma (P=.006). Lesion location, mammographic finding, core number, or needle type were not associated (P>.05) with underestimation of malignancy at excision. CONCLUSION: Benign papilloma diagnosed at core biopsy is infrequently (3%) associated with malignancy; mammographic follow-up is reasonable. Because of the high association with malignancy (67%), diagnosis of atypical papilloma at core biopsy should prompt excision for definitive diagnosis.     

Ultrasound guided core biopsy of suspicious mammographic calcifications using high frequency and power Doppler ultrasound

AIM: The pre-operative diagnosis of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications usually requires stereotactic needle biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate if high frequency 13 MHz ultrasound (HFUS) and power Doppler (PD) can aid visualization and biopsy of microcalcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients presenting with microcalcifications without associated mammographic or palpable masses were examined with HFUS and PD. Ultrasound-guided core biopsy (USCB) was performed where possible. Stereotactic biopsy was carried out when US-guided biopsy was unsuccessful. Surgery was performed if a diagnosis of malignancy was made on core biopsy or if the repeat core biopsy was non-diagnostic. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (93%) had ultrasound abnormalities corresponding to mammographic calcification. USCB was performed on 37 patients. In 29/37, USCB obtained a definitive result (78.4%). USCB was non-diagnostic in 4/9 benign (44.4%) and 4/28 (14.3%) malignant lesions biopsied. The complete and absolute sensitivities for malignancy using USCB were 85.7% (24/28) and 81% (23/28), respectively. USCB correctly identified invasive disease in 12/23 (52.2%) cases. There was no significant difference in the presence of abnormal flow on PD between benign and malignant lesions. However, abnormal PD vascularity was present in 43.5% of invasive cancer and was useful in directing successful biopsy in eight cases. CONCLUSION: The combination of high frequency US with PD is useful in the detection and guidance of successful needle biopsy of microcalcifications particularly where there is an invasive focus within larger areas of DCIS.     

Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates

PURPOSE: To measure the effect of biopsy device, probe size, mammographic lesion type, lesion size, and number of samples obtained per lesion on the ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) underestimation rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nonpalpable breast lesions at 16 institutions received a histologic diagnosis of DCIS after 14-gauge automated large-core biopsy in 373 lesions and after 14- or 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy in 953 lesions. The presence of histopathologic invasive carcinoma was noted at subsequent surgical biopsy. RESULTS: By performing the chi(2) test, independent significant DCIS underestimation rates by biopsy device were 20.4% (76 of 373) of lesions diagnosed at large-core biopsy and 11.2% (107 of 953) of lesions diagnosed at vacuum-assisted biopsy (P <.001); by lesion type, 24.3% (35 of 144) of masses and 12.5% (148 of 1,182) of microcalcifications (P <.001); and by number of specimens per lesion, 17.5% (88 of 502) with 10 or fewer specimens and 11.5% (92 of 799) with greater than 10 (P <.02). DCIS underestimations increased with lesion size. CONCLUSION: DCIS underestimations were 1.9 times more frequent with masses than with calcifications, 1.8 times more frequent with large-core biopsy than with vacuum-assisted biopsy, and 1.5 times more frequent with 10 or fewer specimens per lesion than with more than 10 specimens per lesion.     

Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience

From January 1, 1976 to December 30, 1985, 1,966 cases of breast carcinoma were diagnosed and treated at Malmo General Hospital, Malmo, Sweden. Of these cases, 185 (9.4%) involved invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Mammography in 137 cases demonstrated the following findings: spiculated opacity (53%), architectural distortion (16%), poorly defined opacity (7%), normal or benign findings (16%), and parenchymal asymmetry (4%). Radiographic definition of the ILC lesion varied greatly with projection: The craniocaudal view demonstrated significant findings more frequently than either the oblique or lateral views. Secondary radiographic findings were present in 31%, microcalcifications were rare, and physical findings were present in 89%. Because of its diffuse growth pattern and tendency to form lesions with opacity equal to or less than that of the parenchyma, ILC can be extremely difficult to detect mammographically. Therefore, the radiologist must be alert for subtle mammographic signs of malignancy and highly suspicious of any abnormal physical findings regardless of the mammographic appearance.     

Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US

PURPOSE: To determine the utility and histopathologic importance of ultrasonographic (US) depiction of breast lesions detected with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 654 consecutive breast MR examinations performed from November 1999 to February 2001. This yielded 64 patients with 93 suspicious, nonpalpable, mammographically occult lesions evident on MR images and recommended for biopsy, for which directed US assessment was performed. Images, pathologic records, and medical records of these patients were reviewed for imaging findings, patient demographics, and histopathologic findings from subsequent biopsy. Statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: The median size of MR abnormalities was 0.9 cm (range, 0.3-5.0 cm). The pattern of enhancement was a focal mass in 76 (82%) lesions and nonmass in 17 (18%). A US correlate was identified in 21 (23%) lesions detected with MR--19 (25%) of 76 focal mass and two (11%) of 17 nonmass lesions. Carcinoma was found in nine (43%) of these lesions, of which seven (78%) were invasive carcinoma and two (22%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Among the lesions without a US correlate, 10 (14%) yielded carcinoma, of which five (50%) were invasive carcinoma and five (50%) were DCIS. The frequency of cancer was significantly higher for lesions that were detected with MR imaging and had a US correlate than for those that did not have a US correlate (43% vs 14%, P =.01). Overall, 19 (20%) lesions detected with MR imaging and examined with US yielded carcinoma at biopsy, and nine (47%) malignant lesions were seen on US images. US depicted seven (58%) of 12 invasive cancers and two (29%) of seven instances of DCIS. CONCLUSION: The likelihood of carcinoma was significantly higher among lesions with a US correlate (43% carcinoma) than lesions without a US correlate (14% carcinoma).     

Image-guided core breast biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ presenting as a non-calcified abnormality

Objective: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) typically presents as calcifications which are detected mammographically. Our aim was to evaluate the less common presentations of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by image-guided core biopsy and correlate with histopathologic diagnoses. Methods and Material: Imaging and histopathologic findings were retrospectively reviewed in 11 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed at core biopsy that presented as noncalcified radiographic abnormalities. Results: Mammography showed non-calcified, circumscribed nodules, ill-defined nodules and architectural distortion. In two patients, no mammographic abnormality was detected. Sonography showed circumscribed, round or oval, solid masses; irregular, heterogeneous masses; and a tubular structure. Histopathologic diagnoses included multiple architectural subtypes and ranged from low to high nuclear grade. Conclusion: Although image-guided core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma is typically made when sampling calcifications, DCIS can be diagnosed following biopsy of non-calcified masses or distortion. There is no correlation between histopathologic subtype and radiologic appearance.     

Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of lesion size on the positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsy in MRI-detected breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 666 consecutive nonpalpable, mammographically occult lesions that had MRI-guided localization. MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5-T magnet. Lesions were measured by the interpreting radiologist before biopsy. Malignancy rate versus lesion size was determined. RESULTS: The median MRI lesion size was 1 cm (range, 0.3-7.0 cm). Malignancy was present in 149/666 (22%) lesions, of which 80 (54%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 66 (44%) were invasive cancer, and three (2%) were lymphoma. The frequency of malignancy increased significantly (p = 0.0005) with lesion size, with malignancy found in one (3%) of 37 lesions less than 5 mm, 44 (17%) of 254 lesions 5-9 mm, 37 (25%) of 151 lesions 10-14 mm, 21 (28%) of 74 lesions 15-19 mm, and 46 (31%) of 150 lesions 20 mm or larger. Lesions less than 5 mm accounted for 37 (6%) of 666 lesions that had a biopsy and one (< 1%) of 149 cancers (one DCIS). Among lesions less than 10 mm, the likelihood of malignancy was highest in postmenopausal women (22% malignant) and in the extent of disease setting (22% malignant), and lowest in premenopausal women (10% malignant) and in the high-risk screening setting (10% malignant). CONCLUSION: The PPV of biopsy for lesions identified at breast MRI using a 1.5-T magnet significantly increased with increasing lesion size. Biopsy is rarely necessary for lesions smaller than 5 mm because of their low (3%) likelihood of cancer. Further work is needed to develop an algorithm that uses size in addition to other patient and lesion factors to guide biopsy recommendations for MRI-detected breast lesions.     

Multifocal,multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative bilateral whole-breast ultrasonography (US) in the detection of additional multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral cancers and the effect of US information on therapeutic decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred one patients who had newly diagnosed breast cancer or who were suspected of having breast cancer underwent US examination of the ipsilateral and contralateral breasts with a 10-, 12-, or 13-MHz transducer. All solid lesions found at US alone were classified according to level of suspicion and were selected for biopsy. The US results were compared with mammographic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: In ipsilateral breasts, US depicted 194 (97%) of 201 foci of invasive cancer and 52 (75%) of 69 foci of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), whereas mammography and physical examination depicted 173 (86%) foci of invasive cancer and 56 (81%) foci of DCIS. In the contralateral breast, US depicted 11 (92%) of 12 foci of invasive cancer and four (57%) of seven foci of DCIS, whereas mammography and physical examination depicted six (50%) foci of invasive cancer and five (71%) foci of DCIS. Overall, US depicted mammographically and clinically unsuspected multifocal or multicentric cancers in 28 patients (14%) and contralateral cancer in eight patients (4%). On the basis of these US findings, therapy was correctly changed in 32 patients (16%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of prospective classification of 77 solid lesions detected at US alone were 100% (36 of 36), 51% (21 of 41), 64% (36 of 56), and 100% (21 of 21), respectively. CONCLUSION: Bilateral whole-breast US complements mammography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with breast cancer.     

Multiple 14G stereotactic core biopsies in the diagnosis of mammographically detected stellate lesions of the breast

AIM: The aim of this retrospective study was to measure the accuracy of stereotactic guided 14 gauge core biopsy in distinguishing between benign and malignant causes of a mammographically detected stellate breast lesion and to assess the impact of the number of core samples taken on the sensitivity for detection of malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients with mammographically detected stellate lesions of the breast formed the study group. All patients in the study group underwent multiple 14 gauge core biopsies using prone stereotactic breast biopsy equipment. The diagnostic accuracy of the technique was measured by retrospectively comparing the outcome with the core biopsy results. The result of each core sample was separately recorded to allow analysis of the effect of increasing the number of samples on accuracy. RESULTS: Nine of 72 (12%) did not have surgery. Forty of 72 (56%) had a benign surgical outcome and 23/72 (32%) a malignant surgical outcome [7/72 (10%) non-invasive, 16/72 (22%) invasive carcinoma]. The absolute sensitivity for multiple stereotactic guided core biopsies of stellate lesions for the detection of malignancy was 78% with a complete sensitivity of 100%. The sensitivity for the detection of invasive carcinoma was 94% (15 out of 16 patients). No statistically significant improvement in sensitivity was shown for multiple samples vs one sample, but in two patients, malignant tissue was only found in core samples 6-9, the first five cores showing atypia only. CONCLUSION: Multiple stereotactic guided 14 gauge core biopsies accurately distinguish malignant from benign causes of stellate breast lesions. When core biopsy histology is malignant, therapeutic surgery can be planned. When the core biopsy shows typical features of a benign radial scar, diagnostic surgical excision may not be required to confirm the diagnosis.Kirwan, S. E., (2000). Clinical Radiology55, 763-766.     

Carcinoma within fibroadenomas: mammographic features

The mammographic features of carcinoma originating within a fibroadenoma in 24 patients were studied by means of retrospective review of pathologic slides. Histologic examination showed that the lesions were lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (seven patients), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (13 patients), synchronous LCIS and invasive lobular carcinoma (one patient), and synchronous LCIS and DCIS (three patients). In all patients the mammographic manifestation was a mass 1.0 cm or greater in diameter; 14 masses were 1-2 cm in diameter, and the remainder were more than 2 cm in diameter. Features that were considered suspect included large size, indistinct margins, and clustered microcalcifications. In three patients, microcalcifications within the mass raised suspicion of malignancy. At histologic examination these microcalcifications were associated with the intraductal carcinoma harbored in the fibroadenoma in only one of these patients. Fibroadenomas that harbor carcinoma may be indistinguishable from common benign fibroadenomas, but their occurrence is rare. In this study, a single patient had invasive lobular carcinoma; all the other lesions were in situ lesions.