Subareolar injection for sentinel lymph node location in breast cancer.

AIM: Several different injection techniques are currently used for sentinel node (SN) identification in patients with breast cancer. Some studies suggest that the subareolar plexus drains lymph from the whole breast to the same axillary SN. In order to test this hypothesis, we ascertained whether subareolar blue dye injection and subdermal radioisotope injection close to the tumour identify the same axillary nodes. METHODS: One day prior to surgery, 50 patients with breast cancer underwent subdermal injection of 30-40MBq of 99m-Tc colloidal albumin (Nanocoll) at the site of the cutaneous projection of the tumour. Ten minutes before surgery, each patient received a subareolar injection of 2-3cc of patent blue. All axillary radioactive nodes and blue-stained nodes were excised and a histologic examination was made. RESULTS: Radioisotope marked the SNs in 47/50 (94%) cases, and the blue dye in 43/50 cases (86%). In three cases, SNs were not identified with either method. Of the 43 cases in which both the tracers reached the axilla, in 40 (93%) the SN was hot and blue-stained, while in 3 cases the two tracers identified different nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that subareolar injection and subdermal injection elsewhere in the breast usually identify the same SN. Subareolar injection appears to be particularly valuable in patients with multicentric or deep non-palpable breast tumours.     

Sentinel node biopsy in patients with multiple breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Multicentric or multifocal breast cancer is considered a limitation for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Studies showing that all quadrants of the breast drain via common afferent lymphatic channels indicate that multiple tumors do not affect lymphatic drainage. We therefore assessed the accuracy of SLNB in patients with multiple breast tumors. METHODS: Of the 942 breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB using radioisotope at Asan Medical Center between January 2003 and December 2006, 803 had unifocal and 139 had multiple tumors. Axillary dissection after SLNB was performed on 884 patients, 757 with unifocal and 127 with multiple tumors. All patients underwent lymphatic scintigram for removal of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). The clinical characteristics and accuracy of SLNB was compared in patients with unifocal and multiple breast cancer. RESULTS: In the multiple tumor group, 2.68 +/- 0.84 SLNs were identified in 136 of 139 patients (identification rate, 97.84%); 81.5% of SLNs were identified by scintigram. The incidence of axillary metastases was 29.50% (41/139). SLNB accuracy was 97.63% (124/127), with a false negative (FN) rate of 7.89% (3/38). In the unifocal group, 2.67 +/- 0.96 SLNs were identified in 787 of 803 patients (identification rate, 98.00%); 84.8% of SLNs were identified by scintigram. The incidence of axillary metastasis was 22.04% (177/803). SLNB accuracy was 98.02% (742/757), with a FN rate of 8.62% (15/174). The accuracy and FN rate of SLNB did not differ significantly between unifocal and multiple breast cancer. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of SLNB in multiple breast cancer is comparable to its accuracy in unifocal cancer. These findings indicate that SLNB can be used an as alternative to complete axillary lymph node dissection in patients with multiple breast tumors.     

Sentinel lymph node and breast cancer staging: final results of the Turin Multicenter Study

AIM OF THE STUDY: Validation of the sentinel node (SN) technique in breast cancer by means of lymphoscintigraphy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 1996 to January 1999 102 T1-T2 breast carcinoma cases were recruited in Turin. 99mTc-human serum albumin colloids were injected subdermally the day before surgery (mean activity, 5.2 +/- 2.5 MBq). Scintigraphic imaging was performed after injection. After identification of the SN during surgery by a hand-held gamma probe, the SN was excised and sent for histologic examination. SN histology was compared with that of other axillary nodes. RESULTS: The SN detection rate was 86.3%; among 88 cases with an identified SN, 37 (42%) had axillary metastases; the SN was metastatic in 35 cases (sensitivity, 94.6%); in 51.3% of pN+ cases (19/37) the SN was the only metastatic site. In two of the 53 negative SNs, SN histology did not match with that of the remaining axilla (negative predictive value, 96.2%; staging accuracy, 97.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results agree with those reported in the literature; however, except in clinical trials and experienced structures axillary lymph node dissection should not be abandoned when mandatory for prognostic purposes, considering that at present SN biopsy alone is not completely accurate for axillary staging, especially in the absence of an adequate learning period.     

Sentinel lymph-node biopsy compared to axillary lymph-node dissection for axillary staging in breast cancer patients.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in breast cancer patients at our institution and to compare the results of sentinel node (SN) biopsy to standard axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND). METHODS: In a retrospective study the percentage of lymph-node positive patients and the number of micrometastases in 165 breast cancer patients following SN biopsy was compared to 195 patients who underwent ALND of level I and II without SN biopsy. The SN was identified using a combination of vital blue dye and a radiolabelled colloid. RESULTS: Patients and tumour characteristics were comparable between both groups. SN biopsy found no significant difference in the number of node positive T1 cancer patients (SN group: 31/108 (28.7%) -- ALND group: 21/92 (22.8%)) and T2 tumours (SN group: 27/57 (47.4%) -- ALND group: 49/103 (47.6%)) between both groups. Micrometastases were more frequently found in the SN group when compared to the ALND group (six of 70 positive nodes) (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: SN biopsy may be as accurate as standard axillary lymph-node dissection for the evaluation of the axillary lymph-node status in breast cancer patients. Copyright Harcourt Publishers Limited.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an accurate method for axillary staging in patients with early breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and the feasibility of SLNB in breast cancer patients who had received preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with advanced breast cancer stage II or III who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in the study. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and biopsy was attempted and performed, and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed in the same surgical procedure after SLNB. The histopathologic examination of the SLNs and the dissected axillary lymph nodes was performed and nodal status was compared. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in the study. After peritumoural injection of technetium-99m labelled human albumin and subareolar subcutaneous injection of blue dye, the SLNs could be identified in 26/30 patients (identification rate 86.7%). In 4/30 patients (13.3%) SLNs could not be identified. In 25/26 patients (96.2%) SLNs accurately predicted the axillary status. Eleven patients had negative SLNs and negative nodes in ALND. Six patients had positive SLNs and positive nodes in ALND. In eight patients SLNs only were positive and nodes in ALND were negative. One patient had a false-negative SLNB, calculating a false-negative rate of 6.7% (1/15). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB is a well introduced technique for axillary staging in patients with early breast cancer. The accuracy of SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is similar to patients with primary surgery. SLNB could be an alternative to ALND in a subgroup of patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and therefore could reduce morbidity due to surgery in those patients. Due to small numbers of patients, further evaluation in this subset of patients is required.     

The sentinel lymph node in T1N0 breast cancer

The authors report their experience gathered from December 1998 to December 1999 in the use of the sentinel lymph node (SN) method in breast cancer treatment. In 20 out of 21 cases (95%) localization of the SN was obtained by scintigraphy while in 19 cases (90.5%) the SN was found during surgery. Histological examination of the axillary lymph nodes gave a 95% accuracy with only one negative SN associated with positive axillary lymph nodes out of a total of 19. However, the authors have subjected all patients to a complete three-level axillary dissection since they believe the method applied has not yet been fully validated.     

Combination technique is superior to dye alone in identification of the sentinel node in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the combination of dye and radioisotope would improve the detection rate of sentinel nodes (SN) and the diagnostic accuracy of axillary lymph node status over dye alone in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was performed in stages I or II breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes using dye alone (indocyanine green) or a combination of dye and radioisotope (99mTc-radiolabelled tin colloid). RESULTS: SNB guided by dye alone was performed in 93 patients and SNB guided by a combination of dye and radioisotope was performed in 138 patients. The detection rate of SN was significantly (P = 0.006) higher in the combination group (94.9%) than in the dye alone group (83.9%). The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of SNB in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node status were 100, 100, and 100%, respectively, for the combination group, and 81.0, 100, and 94.9%, respectively, for the dye alone group. There were no false negatives in the combination group, but four false negatives (19.0%) in the dye alone group. The combination method was significantly superior to the dye alone method for sensitivity (P = 0.011) and accuracy (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a radioisotope to the dye in SNB increases the detection rate of SNs in breast cancer patients, and SNs detected by the combination method predict the axillary lymph node status with greater accuracy than those detected by the dye alone method.     

Initial experience with sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer at the National Cancer Center Hospital East

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection is an important procedure in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Axillary lymph node dissection is still performed in over half of breast cancer patients having histologically negative nodes, regardless of the morbidity in terms of axillary pain, numbness and lymphedema. The first regional lymph nodes draining a primary tumor are the sentinel lymph nodes. Sentinel node biopsy is a promising surgical technique for predicting histological findings in the remaining axillary lymph nodes, especially in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer, and a worldwide feasibility study is currently in progress. METHODS: Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy were performed in the axilla by subcutaneous injection of blue dye (indigocarmine) in 88 cases of stage 0-IIIB breast cancer. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified by detecting blue-staining lymph nodes or dye-filled lymphatic tracts after total or partial mastectomy. Finally, axillary lymph node dissection was performed up to Levels I and II or more. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified in 65 of the 88 cases (74%). In the final histological examination, the sentinel lymph nodes in 40 cases were negative, including four cases with non-sentinel-node-positive breast cancer (specificity, 100%; sensitivity, 86%). In nine (31%) of the 29 cases with histologically node-positive breast cancer, the sentinel lymph nodes were the only lymph nodes affected. Axillary lymph node status was accurately predicted in 61 (94%) of the 65 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although it was the initial experience at the National Cancer Center Hospital East, sentinel node biopsy proved feasible and successful. This method may be a reasonable alternative to the standard axillary lymph node dissection in patients with early breast cancer.     

18F-FDG PET complemented with sentinel lymph node biopsy in the detection of axillary involvement in breast cancer.

AIM: The presence of axillary involvement is the most important prognostic factor in breast cancer. This study analysis the value of 18F-FDG PET in the detection of the lymph node status. METHODS: This study includes 200 breast cancer patients. The PET scans were obtained after the injection of 370 MBq of 18F-FDG; the breast areas, axillary, supraclavicular and internal mammary lymph node chains were evaluated. In a subgroup of 100 patients the PET-FDG scan was complemented with the study of the sentinel node (SN) in those cases which did not demonstrate pathological lymph node uptake. The standardized uptake value (SUV) was related to the tumour characteristics of size, histological type, axillary status and histological grading. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of PET-FDG in the detection of axillary involvement was 84.1 and 97.8%, respectively. Seventeen false negative cases were obtained, and were associated with low SUV in the mammary tumour.In 15 cases the PET-FDG scans revealed pathological uptake foci that suggested involvement of the internal mammary chain. CONCLUSIONS: The PET-FDG avoids routine SN study in those cases presenting axillary uptake, but it must be complemented by sentinel node study in those cases without pathological uptake. The association of PET-FDG and SN improves the sensitivity in the detection of axillary involvement. Its sensitivity and specificity in the analysis of axillary status can be extended to the evaluation of the internal mammary chain.     

Sentinel node biopsy can replace four-node-sampling in staging early breast cancer.

AIM: Four-node axillary sampling for breast cancer is an established method of staging the axilla in the United Kingdom. We report the sensitivity of sentinel node (SN) biopsy and compare it with that of four-node sampling. METHODS: SN identification was attempted in 234 consecutive patients with unifocal breast cancers up to 25 mm in diameter on pre-operative ultrasound. A combination of isotope-labelled nanocolloid and patent blue dye techniques were used and SN were identified in 221 (94.5%). All patients underwent back-up four-node sampling and those with positive sentinel nodes on frozen section (FS) underwent immediate full axillary clearance. RESULTS: Among those patients who had SN successfully identified, an average of 1.38 SN were identified per patient. Histological examination of the SN alone would have identified all node-positive patients that the four-node sample identified. CONCLUSION: In patients who have SN identified, four-node axillary sampling does not provide any additional information.     

Localization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer by combined lymphoscintigraphy, blue dye and intraoperative gamma probe

Axillary lymph node status represents the most important prognostic factor in patients with operable breast cancer. A severe limitation of this technique is the relatively high rate of false negative sentinel lymph nodes (>5%). We studied 284 patients suffering from breast cancer; 264 had T1 tumors (16 T1a, 37 T1b and 211 T1c), while 20 had T2 tumors. All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy 18-h before surgery. At surgery, 0.5 mL of patent blue violet was injected subdermally, and the sentinel lymph node (SN) was searched by gamma probe and by the dye method. The surgically isolated SN was processed for intraoperative and delayed examinations. The SN was successfully identified by the combined radioisotopic procedure and patent blue dye technique in 278/284 cases (97.9%). Analysis of the predictive value of the SN in relation to the status of the axillary lymph nodes was limited to 191 patients undergoing standard axillary dissection irrespective of the SN status. Overall, 63/191 (33%) identified SNs were metastatic, the SN alone being involved in 37/63 (58.7%) patients; a positive axillary status with negative SN was found in 10/73 (13.7%) patients with metastatic involvement. In T1a-T1b patients the SN turned out to be metastatic in 9/53 patients (17.0%). In 7/9 patients the SN was the only site of metastasis, while in 2/9 patients other axillary lymph nodes were found to be metastatic in addition to the SN. None of the 44 patients in whom the SN proved to be non-metastatic showed any metastatic involvement of other axillary lymph nodes. Our results demonstrate a good predictive value of SN biopsy in patients with breast cancer; the predictive value was excellent in those subjects with nodules smaller than 1 cm.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy as an indicator for axillary dissection in early breast cancer

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is a new component of the surgical treatment of breast cancer that accurately predicts axillary status. Although the procedure is still mainly investigational, many patients are requesting SNB to avoid axillary dissection if the sentinel node (SN) is negative. From March 1996 to December 1999, 373 patients with breast carcinoma and clinically negative axillary nodes underwent breast surgery, mainly conservative, and SNB. If the SN was histologically uninvolved no further surgical treatment was given. All patients were informed in detail and signed a consent form. SNB involved injection of labelled albumin particles close to the primary tumour, lymphoscintigraphy and location of the sentinel node with a gamma probe during surgery. 379 SNBs were performed on 373 patients (6 were bilateral). In 94, the SN was positive and complete axillary dissection was performed. In 285 cases (280 patients) the SN was negative and no dissection was performed: these were carefully followed with quarterly clinical examination of the axilla. A total of 343 years at risk were available for evaluation from which seven cases of axillary metastases were expected. No cases of clinically evident axillary node metastasis have occurred. These findings provide further confirmation of the validity of SNB and prompt us to suggest that it should become the method of choice for axillary staging in small-sized breast cancer.     

Axillary sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: a single lymphatic pathway drains the entire mammary gland.

AIM: To report the pattern of lymphatic mapping following intrasubdermal injections of radiocolloid and of blue dye in different sites of the breast. METHODS: Prior to surgery 137 breast cancer patients underwent intrasubdermal injection of 30-50 MBq 99mTc-colloidal albumin over the tumour site (ISI group). Ten minutes before surgery, 2 ml patent blue was injected in the subareolar area (SAI group) in 117/137 patients, while 20 patients received intrasubdermal blue-dye in the quadrant opposite the tumour site (OQI group). The different injection routes were considered concordant when the hottest sLN was also blue. RESULTS: In 134/137 patients radiocolloid drained to one or more axillary nodes, while blue nodes were found in 98/117 SAI patients and in 17/20 OQI patients. Multiple hot nodes were found in 63/134 cases and multiple blue nodes in 35/115. In patients in whom both tracers reached the axilla, the hottest node was also blue in 108/115 cases (93/98 SAI and 15/17 OQI patients). In the seven discordant cases, the hottest node was not blue, but in two cases the blue node was also radioactive. CONCLUSIONS: Superficial lymphatic drainage from the breast most frequently merges to a single axillary lymph node, irrespective of the site of tracer injection. In a few cases different injection sites identify different, often closely interconnected sLNs.     

Identification of sentinel node in breast cancer: comparison between peritumoral and periareolar injection of the radiopharmaceutical contrast medium

Axillary node status is the most important prognostic factor for patients with primary breast carcinoma. The sentinel node biopsy (SN) technique has received much attention as a possible alternative to axillary lymph node dissection. The aim of this study is to identify the sentinel node by periareolar and subdermal injection of the radiopharmaceutical in four points, independent of tumor topography and the presence of biopsies and/or previous surgery. The peritumoral injection technique was carried out for comparison purposes. This study was performed on 115 patients, divided into 2 groups: Group A (25 patients, peritumoral injection) and Group B (90 patients, injection in four points). All the SN biopsies were studied by both imprint cytology and H&E staining. Control axillary lymph-node dissection was followed in all patients from Group A and in these positive cases from Group B. Twenty-two out of the twenty-five (88%) SNs were identified in Group A. There was no false negative; the sensitivity and specificity were 100%. Eighty-two of the ninety (91.1%) SNs were identified in Group B. Lymphoscintigraphy showed radiopharmaceutical migration to axilla in 93.7% of the cases. Hotspot area was 10 to 100 times the intensity of the background radiation. Among the 92 cases with negative sentinel nodes at intraoperative examination (TP), the SN histopathology confirmed the absence of cancer cells in 89 patients, whereas 3 were positive for metastatic cells. This study shows that periareolar injection in four points seems to be a good lymphatic mapping method for SN identification. We suggest standardizing this site of injection to identify the SNs. More studies to confirm these findings are ongoing.     

Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: does each focus matter?

PURPOSE: The identification of multiple tumors in the breast is associated with increased nodal involvement when compared with similar staged unifocal disease. This study compares two methods of tumor size assessment to predict tumor behavior in the relationship between size and axillary node involvement for patients with multifocal and multicentric breast cancer. METHODS: The histologic reports of every patient with multifocal breast cancer treated in New South Wales between April 1995 and September 1995 were examined. Tumors were assessed using two size estimates: (1) largest tumor focus diameter and (2) the aggregate diameters of all tumor foci. The dimensions were compared with unifocal tumors and against node positivity. RESULTS: Ninety-four (11.1%) of 848 women had multifocal breast cancer and of these 49 women (52.1%) had axillary node involvement compared with 37.5% with unifocal breast cancer (P =.007). The use of aggregate dimension reclassified significant numbers of multifocal tumors at a more advanced stage. Use of this method to stage cancers, rather than the largest tumor size, removed the excess node positivity when compared with unifocal, stage-matched breast carcinomas. CONCLUSION: The tendency of breast tumors to metastasize is a reflection of the total tumor load. Failure to measure the additional tumor burden provided by multiple small foci may understage a woman's disease. This may deny patients the opportunity of adjuvant therapies if the contribution of the smaller foci to the incidence of node positivity and survival is ignored.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with multifocal breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Multifocal or multicentric breast cancer has been suggested as a contraindication for sentinel node biopsy (SNB). However, recent studies have demonstrated that all quadrants of the breast drain through common afferent channels to a common axillary sentinel node. This should mean that the presence of multifocal tumour should not affect the lymphatic drainage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of SNB in patients with multifocal breast cancer using a peritumoural injection technique for sentinel lymph node (SN) mapping. METHODS: In the ALMANAC multicentre trial validation phase, we took SNB samples from 842 patients with node negative, invasive breast cancer with use of a blue dye and radiolabelled colloid mapping technique at the peritumoural injection site. All patients underwent standard axillary treatment after SNB. Seventy-five of the 842 patients had multifocal lesions on final histopathologic examination. The following analysis is focused on patients with multifocal lesions. RESULTS: A mean number of 2.4 SNs were identified in 71 of 75 patients (identification rate: 94.7%). Thirty-one patients had a positive SN, 40 a negative SN. Standard axillary treatment confirmed the SN to be negative in 37 of 40 patients, whereas three patients revealed positive non-sentinel lymph nodes (false-negative rate: 8.8%). Overall SN biopsy accurately predicted axillary lymph node status in 68 of 71 patients (95.8%). CONCLUSION: SNB accurately staged the axilla in multifocal breast cancer and may become an alternative to complete axillary lymph node dissection in node negative patients with multifocal breast cancer.     

Correlation of tumor volume and surface area with lymph node status in patients with multifocal/multicentric breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Multicentric breast carcinomas have a higher frequency of axillary lymph node metastasis than unifocal tumors of similar stage. It remains unclear whether this merely reflects larger tumor volumes or a different biologic behavior. The authors have shown previously that when aggregate tumor diameter are used for staging, unifocal and multifocal tumors have a similar frequency of axillary lymph node metastasis. However, summing diameter overestimates actual tumor volume because volume is proportional to the third power of the diameter. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to reanalyze the relation between size and axillary lymph node status by correcting for tumor volumes and surface areas. METHODS: Volumes and surface areas of 122 breast tumor specimens with multiple macroscopic nodules (two foci: n = 95; three foci: n = 22; three foci: n = 5) were calculated by approximating the shape of each tumor nodule to an ellipsoid (for volume) or to a prolate spheroid (for area). For comparison, the authors used an internal control series, comprised of 469 macroscopic unifocal tumors. For all patients, multiple assessments of largest tumor size and combined size of all foci were correlated with the status of axillary lymph nodes. The associations between lymph node status, tumor volume or area, and multifocality were modeled using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: When either the largest or the aggregate tumor volume was used as a size estimate, tumor specimens with multiple nodules had a higher frequency of lymph node involvement compared with unifocal tumors of a similar volume or area. The odds ratio (OR) for having positive lymph nodes was 2.34 for aggregate volume measurement (P < 0.001). Surface area estimates yielded similar results (OR = 2.2, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Breast tumors with multiple macroscopic nodules had a different biology, with a propensity to dissemination at smaller tumor volumes (i.e., there was another factor besides volume alone that accounted for the differences in behavior).     

Follow-up of sentinel node negative breast cancer patients without axillary lymph node dissection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients at our institution and to report the follow-up status of node-negative patients with removal of only the sentinel node. METHODS: A total of 247 breast cancer patients underwent sentinel node (SN) mapping between June of 1996 and September of 2000. The SN was identified by using a combination of vital blue dye and a radiolabeled colloid. RESULTS: A SN was identified in 227 of 247 patients (91.9%). One hundred forty-five were SN negative, 82 were SN positive. All SN-positive patients underwent axillary dissection of level I and II, whereas 83 patients with a negative SN had SN biopsy only. Median follow-up of these patients at 22 months revealed no axillary recurrence; the morbidity resulting from SN biopsy was negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Although the follow-up is very short, SN biopsy only in node-negative breast cancer patients had no negative impact on the axillary failure rate and resulted in negligible morbidity.     

Observational study of blue dye-assisted four-node sampling for axillary staging in early breast cancer

Background

The use of radioisotopes (RIs) is regulated and not all institutions have nuclear medicine facilities for sentinel node biopsy (SNB). We previously reported blue dye-assisted four-node axillary sampling (4NAS/dye) to be a suitable method for detecting sentinel nodes (SNs) without RIs. Here, we present an interim report on an observational study of this technique.

Methods

From May 2003 to June 2008, 234 early breast cancer patients underwent SNB with 4NAS/dye. Lymphatic mapping was performed by injection of patent blue, and axillary sampling was performed until 4 SNs were detected. Patients with metastatic SNs underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) at levels I and II, while SN-negative patients did not undergo further axillary procedures.

Results

The SN identification rate was 99%. In total, 44 patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease by using the 4NAS/dye technique and underwent ALND; the remaining 189 patients did not undergo ALND (the SNB group). After a median follow-up period of 54 months, only 1 patient (0.5%) in the SNB group developed axillary recurrence. For the 4NAS/dye procedure, blue SNs were harvested in 220 patients (94%) and only unstained SNs were harvested in 13 patients (6%). Among the 44 patients with SN metastases, foci were found in blue SNs in 37 patients (84%), while they were found in only unstained SNs in 7 patients (16%).

Conclusions

SNB with 4NAS/dye is a safe and reliable technique for treatment of early breast cancer patients. This technique may be particularly useful for surgeons who do not have access to radioisotope facilities.     

Gamma probe and ultrasonographically-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.

AIM: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of gamma probe and ultrasonographically-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the pre-operative detection of sentinel node (SN) metastasis in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was performed in patients with stage I or II breast cancer with clinically negative nodes using dye and radio-isotope. Axillas of 60 patients in whom a hot spot was detected by gamma probe were examined by ultrasonography. Pre-operative diagnosis of SN metastasis by gamma probe and ultrasonographically-guided FNAB was compared with the histological results of SN. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of SN metastasis were 50.0%, 92.1% and 76.7%, respectively. SNs were visualized by ultrasonography in 29 of 60 patients. Of 14 patients with positive results by ultrasonography, four had positive and two had negative cytology. The combination of ultrasonography and ultrasonographically-guided FNAB for visualized nodes had a sensitivity of 78.5%, specificity of 93.3% and overall accuracy of 86.2%. Blind FNAB in the hot spot was not useful in the detection of SN metastasis in patients whose SNs failed to be detected by ultrasonography. CONCLUSIONS: Gamma probe and ultrasonographically-guided FNAB is a potentially useful method for pre-operative detection of SN metastasis. In patients with positive SNs, SNB is not indicated and complete axillary lymph-node dissection can be performed as a primary procedure. Copyright Harcourt Publishers Limited.