A two-cohort phase II clinical trial of gemcitabine plus treosulfan in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma

In-vitro synergy of treosulfan and gemcitabine has been observed in chemotherapy-resistant tumours. This trial investigated the efficacy of gemcitabine plus treosulfan in metastatic uveal melanoma. Patients received 1000 mg/m of gemcitabine and treosulfan at a dose of 2500 or 3000 mg/m2 in cohort 1 and 3500 or 4000 mg/m2 in cohort 2. Chemotherapy was administered on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks. Thirty-three patients were treated, 14 in cohort 1 and 19 in cohort 2. In cohort 1 with a treosulfan dose of or=3500 mg/m2 in cohort 2, one had partial remission (5%), 10 showed disease stabilization and eight progressed. An increased survival was observed in the second cohort with higher treosulfan doses, with median survival times of 6.0 versus 9.0 months (P=0.03) in cohort 1 and 2, respectively, and a 1-year survival of 7.1% versus 47.3%, respectively. Based on the observation of prolonged disease stabilization, we recommend further investigation of the gemcitabine/treosulfan combination with a dose of 3500 mg/m2 of treosulfan in metastatic uveal melanoma.     

A clinical phase I trial of gemcitabine and treosulfan in uveal melanoma and other solid tumours

This trial was performed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of treosulfan administered in combination with a fixed dose of gemcitabine in uveal melanoma patients. Preclinical studies suggested synergistic activity against uveal melanoma. Gemcitabine (1 g/m2) and treosulfan (2.5-4 g/m2) were administered on days 1 and 8, and cycles were repeated on day 29 for a maximum of six cycles. For treosulfan, dose escalation cohorts of 2-4 patients were enrolled. An additional 25 patients were entered at treosulfan dose levels II (3 g/m2) and III (3.5 g/m2). Thirty three patients with uveal melanoma and six patients with other histologies were accrued. Side-effects were predominantly haematological. The MTD was 3.5 g/m2 of treosulfan together with 1 g/m2 of gemcitabine. In the uveal melanoma patients, one partial response (PR) and 15 stablisations of disease (SD) were recorded and whether this translates into a survival gain should be explored further.     

A randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine plus treosulfan versus treosulfan alone in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Several trials demonstrated efficacy of the gemcitabine/treosulfan (GeT) combination in metastatic uveal melamoma. This randomized phase II trial compared the GeT combination versus treosulfan alone (T) in this rare disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with proven metastatic uveal melanoma were randomly assigned to receive 1000 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine plus 3500 mg/m(2) of treosulfan (GeT) or 3500 mg/m(2) of T. Chemotherapy was administered on days 1 and 8 in both arms, cycles were repeated on day 29. Primary end point was rate of responses and disease stabilizations. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were randomized. Seven confirmed stable diseases (SDs) and one partial remission (PR) were observed in 24 patients treated with the GeT regimen, whereas no PR and only three SDs were observed in the T arm (P = 0.08). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months (95% CI 1.1-4.9) and 2 months (95% CI 1.7-2.3) in the GeT and T arm (P = 0.008, log-rank). Six and 12 months PFS was 34.8% and 17.9% and 16.7% and 0% always favoring the GeT arm. CONCLUSIONS: This first randomized trial in metastatic uveal melanoma showed a superior PFS and a trend for a higher response/stabilization rate of the GeT combination over T.     

Chemoimmunotherapy with bleomycin,vincristine, lomustine,dacarbazine (BOLD), and human leukocyte interferon for metastatic uveal melanoma

BACKGROUND: A Phase II trial comprising patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (Stage IVB) was undertaken to determine the activity of bleomycin, vincristine, lomustine, and dacarbazine (BOLD) chemotherapy with human leukocyte interferon, as well as the progression-free and overall survival of the patients according to the substage before treatment. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with histologically proven metastatic uveal melanoma received 15 mg of bleomycin (Days 2 and 5), 1 mg/m(2) vincristine (Days 1 and 4), 200 mg/m(2) dacarbazine (Days 1 to 5), and 80 mg lomustine (Day 1) every 4 weeks together with a leukocyte interferon preparation (3 x 10(6) IU daily for 6 weeks followed by 6 x 10(6) IU three times per week). RESULTS: Of 20 evaluable patients, 3 (15%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0-38) obtained a partial objective response in hepatic and extrahepatic sites and 11 (55%; 95% CI 32-77) showed stable disease after receiving more than two cycles. The median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI 2-10) and the median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI 8-22). Eleven patients who had favorable pretreatment characteristics (Stage IVBa) survived a median of 17 months (95% CI 4-37) whereas 10 patients with less favorable characteristics (Stage IVBb) survived a median of 11 months (95% CI 1-23). Moderate toxicity occurred with this outpatient regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The BOLD/human leukocyte interferon regimen had modest activity against metastatic uveal melanoma in hepatic and extrahepatic sites. The median overall survival approached that reported for more aggressive intrahepatic therapy regimens. Substage differences can significantly impact study outcomes. Therefore, substage information should be reported to facilitate comparisons between studies.     

Re-evaluating the role of dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: what have we learned in 30 years?

Since dacarbazine was approved for treating metastatic melanoma in the 1970s, numerous studies have evaluated whether different schedules and dacarbazine-based combinations improve clinical outcomes. This evidence-based review shows that combining dacarbazine with other drugs having single-agent activity and/or hormonal or immunotherapeutic compounds fails to provide clinically meaningful improvements in survival, and may increase toxicity. In patients with metastatic melanoma, dacarbazine was previously administered in cycles of multiple consecutive daily infusions per cycle. The introduction of potent antiemetics, together with concerns relating to patient comfort and clinic utilisation time, has enabled regimens involving single-dose dacarbazine, administered at the same total dose per cycle. These appear to be as effective as multiple-dose schedules, are well tolerated, and are more straightforward to administer. Single-administration dacarbazine (850-1000 mg/m2), once every 3 weeks, is currently the standard reference therapy in patients with advanced melanoma. New effective therapies are urgently needed for this treatment-refractory disease.     

Phase II evaluation of temozolomide in metastatic choroidal melanoma

Temozolomide (Temodar) has demonstrated clinical activity against melanoma equivalent to that of intravenous dacarbazine (DTIC). Phase I clinical studies have shown that low dose chronic administration of temozolomide permits the delivery of higher dose intensities than a 5 day dose schedule. Temozolomide is hydrolysed to its active metabolite monomethyltriazenoimidazole carboxamide (MTIC) upon absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, while DTIC is inactive until it is metabolized in the liver to MTIC. In view of this, a higher concentration of MTIC will pass through the liver during the first pass when its source is temozolomide rather than DTIC. To determine if these characteristics of temozolomide will translate into a higher response rate than that achieved with DTIC, we conducted a phase II clinical trial of temozolomide in patients with uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver. Temozolomide was administered orally at a starting dose of 75 mg/m2 per day for 21 days every 4 weeks. Fourteen patients were enrolled in the trial. No complete or partial responses were observed. Stabilization of disease was achieved in two patients. The treatments were well tolerated. We conclude that, like DTIC, temozolomide at the dose and schedule studied in this trial is not effective for the control of metastatic melanoma of uveal origin.     

Phase II trial of cisplatin, gemcitabine and treosulfan in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma

Gemcitabine plus treosulfan (GeT) is under investigation in metastatic uveal melanoma. In this phase II trial, cisplatin was added to a GeT regimen to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of two alkylating agents in combination with gemcitabine. Patients received 30 or 40 mg/m of cisplatin, 1000 mg/m of gemcitabine and 3000 mg/m of treosulfan on days 1 and 8. Therapy was repeated on day 29. A maximum of six cycles was administered. Nineteen patients were included in the trial, of whom 17 were evaluable for response. No objective response was observed; seven patients (41%) had stable disease and 10 (59%) progressed. The median progression-free survival of all 19 patients was 3.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.8-3.1]; the median overall survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 1.9-13.8). Grade 3 and 4 thrombopenia and leucopenia occurred in eight and nine of the 19 patients, respectively. The addition of cisplatin to the GeT regimen results in excessive haematological toxicity without improvement in efficacy.     

A phase II study of bendamustine chemotherapy as second-line treatment in metastatic uveal melanoma

Uveal melanoma is the most frequent primary malignant neoplasm of the eye and has a poor prognosis in metastatic stage. Fotemustine or a combination of gemcitabine and treosulfan has demonstrated some efficacy in metastatic disease. We conducted a phase II trial to assess the second-line activity and toxicity of bendamustine hydrochloride, a nucleoside analogue with alkylating activity. Inclusion criteria were a Karnofsky performance status of > or = 60% and progressive disease during or after first-line chemotherapy. Bendamustine was administered at a dose of 120 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2. Cycles were repeated on day 22. The primary endpoint of the study was the determination of the number of patients achieving an objective response or stable disease. The secondary endpoint was toxicity. Eleven patients were enrolled into the trial. Grade III and IV toxicity consisted of anaemia, thrombocytopenia and leucocytopenia in two, one and two patients, respectively. No grade III or IV non-haematological toxicity was observed. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), all patients showed progressive disease. We conclude that bendamustine is ineffective as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic uveal melanoma.     

Bleomycin,vincristine, lomustine and dacarbazine (BOLD) in combination with recombinant interferon alpha-2b for metastatic uveal melanoma

This EORTC multicentre study analysed the efficacy and tolerability in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma of BOLD chemotherapy in combination with recombinant interferon alpha-2b. The dose of bleomycin was 15 mg on days 2 and 5, of vincristine 1 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 4, of lomustine 80 mg on day 1, and of dacarbazine (DTIC) 200 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, given every 4 weeks for a minimum of two cycles. Subcutaneous (s.c.) interferon alpha-2b at a dose of 3 x 10(6) IU was initiated on day 8 of the first cycle, and continued at a dose of 6 x 10(6) IU three times per week after 6 weeks. A median of two cycles were administered to 24 patients (median age 60.5 years). None achieved an objective response (0%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0-14), 2 (8.3%) remained stable, 20 showed progression, and 2 (8.3%) were invaluable. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.8-3.4) and overall survival 10.6 months (95% CI: 6.9-16.4). Overall survival improved with increasingly favourable pretreatment characteristics (median, 14.7 versus 6.9 versus 6.0 months for Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH) Working Formulation stages IVBa, IVBb and IVBc, respectively; P=0.018). Grade 3 alopecia and neurotoxicity occurred in 13% of the patients. This multicentre study did not confirm earlier reports that BOLD with human leucocyte or recombinant interferon would induce at least 15% objective responses in metastatic uveal melanoma.     

A phase III randomized trial of dacarbazine and carboplatin with and without tamoxifen in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND: Metastatic melanoma is a disease associated with a poor prognosis, and dacarbazine is still the reference agent. The authors conducted a randomized trial to test the benefit of adding tamoxifen to dacarbazine and carboplatin chemotherapy for previously untreated patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS: Eligible patients with histologically confirmed, measurable metastatic melanoma were randomized to carboplatin 300 mg/m2 and dacarbazine 1 g/m2 administered intravenously on Day 1 with or without tamoxifen 20 mg/day administered orally throughout the treatment period (C + D +/- T). Chemotherapy was repeated in 28-day treatment cycles for a minimum of 2 cycles or until disease progression. The study was designed to be stopped after accrual of 28 patients per treatment arm based on 80% power to detect an improvement in response from 20% to 40% among patients treated with tamoxifen. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were randomized; all were evaluable for response and survival. The 2 treatment groups were well balanced for various prognostic factors; 75% of patients had predominant visceral disease. Complete and partial responses combined were 10.7% in the C + D arm and 14.3% in the C + D + T arm (P=1.0). Median survival was 7 months for C + D and 4.6 months for C + D + T (the difference was not significant). The median time to disease progression was worse for the patients treated with tamoxifen (P=0.03). Toxicity was similar in the two groups, with no episodes of deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of tamoxifen did not improve the response rate, time to progression, or survival compared with chemotherapy with dacarbazine and carboplatin in unselected patients with metastatic melanoma.     

Combination chemotherapy for choroidal melanoma: ex vivo sensitivity to treosulfan with gemcitabine or cytosine arabinoside

Treatment of choroidal melanoma by chemotherapy is usually unsuccessful, with response rates of less than 1% reported for dacarbazine (DTIC)-containing regimens which show 20% or more response rates in skin melanoma. Recently, we reported the activity of several cytotoxic agents against primary choroidal melanoma in an ATP-based tumour chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA). In this study, we have used the same method to examine the sensitivity of choroidal melanoma to combinations suggested by our earlier study. Tumour material from 36 enucleated eyes was tested against a battery of single agents and combinations which showed some activity in the previous study. The combination of treosulfan with gemcitabine or cytosine arabinoside showed consistent activity in 70% and 86% of cases, respectively. Paclitaxel was also active, particularly in combination with treosulfan (47%) or mitoxantrone (33%). Addition of paclitaxel to the combination of treosulfan + cytosine analogue added little increased sensitivity. For treosulfan + cytosine arabinoside, further sequence and timing experiments showed that simultaneous administration gave the greatest suppression, with minor loss of inhibition if the cytosine analogue was given 24 h after the treosulfan. Administration of cytosine analogue 24 h before treosulfan produced considerably less inhibition at any concentration. While we have so far been unable to study metastatic tumour from choroidal melanoma patients, the combination of treosulfan with gemcitabine or cytosine arabinoside shows activity ex vivo against primary tumour tissue. Clinical trials are in progress.     

Metronomic oral low-dose treosulfan chemotherapy combined with cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor in pretreated advanced melanoma: a pilot study

Purpose The safety and efficacy of oral metronomic low-dose treosulfan chemotherapy in combination with the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor rofecoxib as a compound with antiangiogenic potential, a therapeutic regimen optimally targeting endothelial cells instead of tumor cells, were assessed in pretreated advanced melanoma patients.Methods Endothelial cells were analyzed for proliferation, apoptosis and cytotoxicity in response to increasing concentrations of treosulfan, either in the absence or presence of COX-2 inhibitor, to determine whether inhibition of COX-2 enhanced the effect of treosulfan on cell function. In a clinical pilot study, 12 consecutive patients with pretreated advanced melanoma, meeting the eligibility criteria were enrolled. Patients received combined daily treosulfan chemotherapy (500 mg) with rofecoxib (25 mg). Metastatic lesions were assessed every 12 weeks. Patients with responsive or stable disease were eligible for a further 12-week treatment period. Response criteria according to the WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment were applied. Side effects were classified according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria v2.0.Results At noncytotoxic concentrations, treosulfan inhibited endothelial cell proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion. Simultaneous inhibition of COX-2 significantly increased the extent to which treosulfan suppressed cell proliferation, without inducing cytotoxicity. In the pilot study in which 12 patients were treated, toxicity was mild; only hematologic toxicity of grade II was seen. An objective response was noted in one patient, and four patients showed stabilization of their disease for 24 weeks (one) and 36 weeks (three). The patient who had a partial response subsequently showed stable disease for 48 weeks. The median survival time was 13 months.Conclusions As increases in response rates following polychemo- or biochemotherapy have not been shown to correlate with prolongation in overall survival, more durable control of metastatic melanoma represents an attractive therapeutic goal. Thus, regimens scheduled to primarily target endothelial cells may potentially provide a palliative alternative that preserves quality of life in the absence of significant treatment-related toxicity.     

Sorafenib and dacarbazine as first-line therapy for advanced melanoma: phase I and open-label phase II studies

Method:

The safety of oral sorafenib up to a maximum protocol-specified dose combined with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic, histologically confirmed melanoma was investigated in a phase I dose-escalation study and the activity of the combination was explored in an open-label phase II study.

Results:

In the phase I study, three patients were treated with sorafenib 200 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) plus 1000 mg m⁻² dacarbazine on day 1 of a 21-day cycle and 15 patients had the sorafenib dose escalated to 400 mg b.i.d. without reaching the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. In the phase II study (n=83), the overall response rate was 12% (95% CI: 6, 21): one complete and nine partial, with median response duration of 46.7 weeks. Stable disease was the best response in 37% median duration was 13.3 weeks. Median overall survival (OS) was 37.0 weeks (95% CI: 33.9, 46.0).

Conclusion:

Oral sorafenib combined with dacarbazine had acceptable toxicity and some antineoplastic activity against metastatic melanoma.     

Phase 2 open-label study of weekly docosahexaenoic acid-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)-paclitaxel is a taxane with a unique pharmacokinetic profile. We investigated the safety and response rate of DHA-paclitaxel weekly in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Chemotherapy-naive and previously treated patients were eligible for this open-label phase II study. DHA-paclitaxel (500?mg/m2/week) was administered by a 1-hour intravenous infusion for five consecutive weeks in a 6-weeks cycle. Response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors every 6 weeks. Twenty-two patients were enrolled. The patients' median age was 56 years (range: 33-79 years). Nine patients had a systemic therapy for metastatic disease earlier. The median number of treatment cycles was 1 (range 1-7 cycles). One chemonaive patient with liver metastases had partial response lasting for 5 months. Seven patients (32%) had stable disease with a median duration of 3 months (range: 3-7 months). The median overall survival was 9.8 months. Neutropenia (23%) and musculoskeletal pain (10%) were the most common grade 3 and grade 4 toxicities. As a single-agent therapy, DHA-paclitaxel is safe and well-tolerated in metastatic uveal melanoma patients. Its efficacy in this disease is limited with 32% of patients achieving stable disease. Further evaluation of DHA-paclitaxel in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents and/or targeted agents may improve its antitumor activity.     

Paclitaxel and tamoxifen: An active regimen for patients with metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND: In early trials of paclitaxel administered as a 24-hour infusion, an overall response rate of 16% was reported for patients with metastatic melanoma. Paclitaxel is a natural product-based agent and is thus subject to the problem of multidrug resistance (MDR). Tamoxifen is an agent that can abrogate MDR and potentially enhance the effect of paclitaxel. A Phase II trial of the combination was undertaken with previously treated patients. METHODS: Patients with metastatic cutaneous or mucosal melanoma who were previously treated with the Dartmouth chemotherapy regimen (dacarbazine, carmustine, cisplatin, and tamoxifen) were evaluated. Paclitaxel was administered at a dose of 225 mg/m(2) intravenously over 3 hours every 3 weeks. All patients also took tamoxifen 40 mg orally daily. Treatment continued until disease progression. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients completed at least two cycles of paclitaxel and were evaluable for response. Five responses were observed, 1 complete response, and 4 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 24%. The combination was well tolerated. The most common nonhematologic side effects were myalgia and paresthesia. Hematologic toxicity was mild. No patients developed neutropenic fever. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a Phase II trial evaluating paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion in melanoma patients. The 3-hour infusion is well tolerated and results in little myelosuppression and minimal neurotoxicity. The contribution of tamoxifen is difficult to evaluate because plasma levels were not measured. It is possible that a higher response rate might be observed with larger doses of tamoxifen. Further investigation of paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma is warranted.     

Phase I trial combining gemcitabine and treosulfan in advanced cutaneous and uveal melanoma patients

Gemcitabine and treosulfan are DNA-damaging agents. Preclinical studies suggest that synergism exists when melanoma cells are exposed to both drugs concurrently. We conducted a phase I trial in advanced melanoma patients to determine the optimal dose of gemcitabine to be combined with treosulfan. Cohorts of three patients received increasing doses of gemcitabine, commencing at 0.5 g m(-2), followed by a fixed dose of 5.0 g m(-2) treosulfan on day one of a 21-day cycle. Patients alternately received a first cycle of single-agent gemcitabine or treosulfan before subsequent cycles of both drugs. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were collected in cycles 1 and 2 at various time points until 48 h post-treatment. The single-cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay was used to measure chemotherapy-induced DNA damage. A total of 27 patients were enrolled, no objective responses were observed, but two uveal melanoma patients had minor responses. Dose-limiting myelosuppression was reached at 3.0 g m(-2) gemcitabine. DNA single-strand breaks were detected 4 h post-gemcitabine, repaired by 24 h. DNA interstrand crosslinks were detected 4 h post-treosulfan, fully removed by 48 h. Following combination chemotherapy, treosulfan-induced DNA crosslinks persisted, still being detectable 48 h post-treatment, supporting the hypothesis that gemcitabine potentiates treosulfan-induced cytotoxicity. The recommended regimen for further study is 2.5 g m(-2) gemcitabine combined with 5.0 g m(-2) treosulfan.     

Phase II study of temozolomide plus pegylated interferon-alpha-2b for metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND: Temozolomide and interferon-alpha-2b (IFN-alpha-2b) are both active in melanoma. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of temozolomide in combination with pegylated IFN-alpha-2b in patients with metastatic melanoma without brain metastases was investigated. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed, unresectable, American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage IV melanoma were enrolled in an open-label, Phase II study. The primary endpoints were tumor response and safety. Patients received temozolomide (75 mg/m2/dayx6 weeks with a 2-week break between cycles) plus concomitant subcutaneous pegylated IFN-alpha-2b (0.5 microg/kg/wk, continuously). Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (median age, 55 years) with Stage IV melanoma and a median of 3 metastatic sites were enrolled and received a median of 1 cycle (i.e., 8 weeks) of therapy (range, 0-6 cycles). Eleven patients (31%) (95% confidence interval, 16% to 47%) had an objective tumor response, including 3 with clinical complete response durations of 6 months, 20 months, and 32+ months and 8 with partial responses. Three patients with a partial or mixed response were subsequently rendered free of clinically detectable disease with surgery. The median survival was 12 months with a median follow-up among survivors of 16 months. No patient developed brain metastases while receiving study treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Hematologic toxicity consisted mainly of lymphopenia and leukopenia (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Grades 1-3); no Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of temozolomide plus pegylated IFN-alpha-2b had antitumor activity and was well tolerated in patients with metastatic melanoma. Therefore, further study is warranted.     

Treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma with dacarbazine plus tamoxifen,or vindesine plus tamoxifen: a prospective randomized study

This study aimed to verify whether the advantage in terms of response rate and survival of dacarbazine plus tamoxifen over dacarbazine alone in metastatic malignant melanoma reported in a previous randomized trial was due to a specific interaction of dacarbazine with tamoxifen. A total of 125 patients with locoregional or disseminated malignant melanoma were randomized to receive dacarbazine (250 mg/m(2) days 1-5 every 3 weeks) plus tamoxifen (arm A) or vindesine (3 mg/m(2) every week for 6 weeks, then every 2 weeks) plus tamoxifen (arm B). Of the 125 randomized patients, 57 and 59 were evaluable in arm A and B, respectively. The complete response rates were the same (2% versus 2%) and the complete plus partial response rates were similar (11% versus 14%) in the two groups. There was no significant difference in survival. Neither response or survival correlated with gender. In conclusion, when combined with tamoxifen, dacarbazine does not have a specific effect on response or survival compared with vindesine. The lower response rate to dacarbazine plus tamoxifen (11%) than that reported in the previous trial (28%) might be explained by actual differences in patient and/or participating centre accrual characteristics in the presence of apparently identical eligibility criteria.     

Variates of survival in metastatic uveal melanoma.

PURPOSE: The course and outcome of metastatic uveal melanoma are not well described. We evaluated the survival of our patients with metastatic uveal melanoma, described factors that correlated with survival, and evaluated the influence of screening tests on time of detection and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with metastatic uveal melanoma seen at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1994 and 2004 were identified from our database. We recorded date of initial diagnosis, date of metastatic disease, date of last follow-up, site of the first metastasis, how the first metastasis was discovered, treatment, and outcome of therapy. RESULTS: The estimated median survival of the 119 patients analyzed was 12.5 months; 22% of patients were alive at 4 years. Five variates correlated independently with prolonged survival: Lung/soft tissue as only site of first metastasis, treatment with surgery or intrahepatic therapy, female sex, age younger than 60, and a longer interval from initial diagnosis to metastatic disease. Discovering metastatic disease in asymptomatic patients did not correlate with overall survival; 89% of patients had a single organ as the site of first metastasis. Although liver was the most common site, 39.5% of patients had nonliver sites, most commonly lung, as the first site of metastasis. CONCLUSION: A substantial subset of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma survive more than 4 years with metastatic disease. Data on variates of survival and site of first metastasis may guide strategies for screening patients, although our data failed to show a survival advantage in discovering asymptomatic metastatic disease.     

Combined treatment with pegylated interferon-alpha-2a and dacarbazine in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: a phase 2 study

BACKGROUND.: Dacarbazine (DTIC) and pegylated interferon (IFN)-alpha-2a have both demonstrated some efficacy as single agents in metastatic melanoma. To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first to test a combination of these 2 agents in a phase 2 trial. METHODS.: Twenty-eight patients with stage IV melanoma without brain metastases were treated with DTIC (at a dose of 850 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) combined with weekly pegylated IFN-alpha-2a at a dose of 180 mug. The study was initiated to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination. The primary study endpoint was objective response. RESULTS.: Twenty-five patients were evaluable for response. Two patients (8.0%) achieved a complete response that continued for >480 days and 746 days, respectively. Four patients (16.0%) demonstrated a partial response, and another patient experienced stable disease. Six of 7 nonprogressive patients had either not received treatment or had not developed disease progression during adjuvant IFN treatment for stage II/III disease. The median duration of response was 236 days, the median progression-free survival was 56 days, and the overall survival time was 403 days. Few grade 3 toxicities and only 1 grade 4 toxicity were observed (according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). CONCLUSIONS.: The combination of DTIC and pegylated IFN-alpha-2a was found to be well tolerated in patients with metastatic melanoma. The response rate of 24%, including 2 long-lasting complete responses, is encouraging, but must be confirmed in larger trials. Cancer 2008. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.