Pre-exposure chemoprophylaxis (PREP) as an HIV prevention strategy

Chemoprophylaxis may be a prevention strategy for the sexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Evidence suggests that condom use has waned with the availability of antiretroviral medication, at least in some resource-rich settings. Barrier methods of HIV prevention have inherent problems, and the potential for failure. Microbicide research has focused primarily on male-to-female transmission. Analogous to post-exposure prophylaxis, HIV prevention may be achieved by pre-exposure prophylaxis in some settings. Research in this potential strategy may be rewarding.     

Pre-exposure prophylaxis and the promise of combination prevention approaches

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention is a promising experimental approach currently being tested globally. A number of PrEP trials are evaluating the safety and effectiveness of PrEP in men who have sex with men (MSM) and other populations at risk for HIV, and results will be available from this first generation of efficacy trials over the next few years. Here we review the rationale for orally-administered antiretrovirals for prevention, and outline issues the first generation trials will address as well as questions that may be addressed in future studies. We also describe the rationale for combination prevention approaches that may combine PrEP with other prevention modalities as part of a larger prevention package.     

Tensions Between the Epidemiology and Psychology of HIV Risk: Implications for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis

This study focuses on psychological differences in risk-taking patterns and their association with risk compensation motivations in the context of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Participants were 257 HIV-negative MSM and transgender women recruited in New York City. The majority of participants (89.5 %, n = 230), could be classified as either: Intimates (40 %), who report unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) only with a main partner believed to be HIV-negative; Trusters (34 %), who engaged in UAI only with casual partners believed to be HIV-negative; and Gamblers (26 %) who report UAI with partners of unknown serostatus. Partner-based classifications were better predictors of HIV risk perception and other traditional correlates of risk-taking (e.g. impulsivity, sexual compulsivity) than rates of UAI. The three groups differed significantly in PrEP-related risk compensation motivations: sexual pleasure (Gamblers), intimacy (Trusters) and partner pressure (Intimates). These data underscore the importance of focusing the psychological dynamics of risk perception and sexual decision-making.     

eHealth interventions for HIV prevention

The rapidly changing media landscape and proliferation of new technologies creates vast new opportunities for HIV prevention. The fast growth of the relatively new eHealth field is a testament to the excitement and promise of these new technologies. eHealth interventions in HIV prevention tested to date include computer- and Internet-based interventions; chat room interventions; text messaging interventions; and social media. The current article provides a brief review of these types of interventions in HIV prevention, including their unique advantages and evidence of efficacy. Implications for future research in the eHealth HIV prevention field are discussed.