Surgical sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection as treatment of obstructive azoospermia

Male genital tract obstructions may result from infections, previous inguinal and scrotal surgery (vasectomy) and congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD). Microsurgery can sometimes be successful in treating the obstruction. In other cases and in cases of failed surgical intervention, the patient can be treated by microsurgical or percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA, PESA) or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We present the results of 39 ICSI procedures for obstructive azoospermia in 24 couples. The aetiology of the obstruction was failed microsurgery in 11 patients, CBAVD in nine and genital infections in four. Sperm retrieval was accomplished via MESA in four cases, PESA in 18 cases and via TESE in 11 cases. TESE was only applied when PESA failed to produce enough spermatozoa for simultaneous ICSI. In six patients, the ICSI procedure was performed with cryopreserved spermatozoa after an initial PESA procedure. Fertilization occurred in 47% of the metaphase II oocytes; embryo transfer was performed in 92% of procedures and resulted in a clinical pregnancy in 13/39 procedures. Ongoing pregnancy was achieved in 10/39 procedures. One pregnancy was terminated early after prenatal investigation showed a cytogenetic abnormality (47,XX+18, Edwards syndrome). The other nine pregnancies resulted in the live birth of 10 children, without any congenital abnormalities. Epididymal and testicular retrieved spermatozoa were successfully used for ICSI to treat obstructive azoospermia, and resulted in an ongoing pregnancy in 10 of 24 couples (41.6%) after 39 ICSI procedures, a success rate of 25.6% per treatment cycle and of 27.7% per embryo transfer.      

Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration: aspirate analysis and straws available after cryopreservation in patients with non-reconstructable obstructive azoospermia. MESA/TESE Group Giessen

Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) represents a great advance in the therapy of non-reconstructable obstructive azoospermia. For procedure synchronization, a great number of organizational facilities are needed. Intentional cryopreservation of the aspirate may reduce these problems, therefore the aim of this study was to analyse the amount and quality of aspirate fluid obtained by means of MESA and the quality of the vials after thawing. Furthermore, the available cryopreserved straws were calculated. A total of 93 consecutive MESA procedures were performed and epididymal spermatozoa were obtained in 88 patients. Mean sperm concentration was 40.9 x 10(6) spermatozoa/ml. Global and progressive motility were 24.8 and 7.5% respectively. In one-third of the aspirates, no progressive motile spermatozoa were found. The mean number of straws available was 7.6. In 33 ICSI cycles with frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa, a pregnancy rate of 42.4% was achieved. In conclusion, these data show that enough spermatozoa are available for various ICSI cycles following a single MESA procedure in men with non-reconstructable obstructive azoospermia. Furthermore, ICSI with cryopreserved spermatozoa leads to excellent pregnancy rates     

A comparison of ICSI outcomes with fresh and cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa from the same couples

The published experience with frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) suggests that fertilization and pregnancy success rates are comparable to those achieved with freshly retrieved spermatozoa. However, no study has exactly compared clinical outcomes between the two IVF/ICSI cycles in the same couples. To formally address this issue, we assessed ICSI outcomes in couples each of whom had had two IVF/ICSI cycles: one using fresh and the second using frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa obtained from a single aspiration procedure. From a pool of 101 consecutive patients undergoing IVF/ICSI with epididymal spermatozoa, 19 couples initially used fresh epididymal spermatozoa and subsequently underwent a second IVF/ICSI procedure with frozen-thawed spermatozoa from the same aspiration. Normal (2PN) oocyte fertilization rates, embryo quality and pregnancy rates were compared between the two IVF/ICSI cycles for each couple. In the fresh epididymal sperm group, 58.4% of the injected oocytes fertilized normally compared with 62.0% of the injected oocytes in the frozen-thawed epididymal sperm group, revealing no statistically significant difference. Graded embryo quality also did not differ significantly between the paired IVF/ICSI cycles. The clinical pregnancy rates were 31.6% (6/19) and 36.8% (7/19) in the first and second cycles respectively. All but one pregnancy were singletons. In summary, this study provides strong evidence to support the notion that motile, cryopreserved and thawed epididymal spermatozoa are equal to freshly retrieved spermatozoa for ICSI in couples with obstructive azoospermia.     

No differences in outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh or with frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa.

This retrospective consecutive case series aimed at comparing the results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with fresh and with frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa obtained after microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) in 162 couples. These couples were suffering from infertility because of congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (n = 109), failed microsurgical reversal for vasectomy or postinfectious epididymal obstruction (n = 44), irreparable epididymal obstruction (n = 4), ejaculatory duct obstruction (n = 2) or anejaculation (n = 3). Overall, 176 MESA procedures were performed in the husbands, followed by 275ICSI procedures with either fresh (n = 157) or frozen-thawed (n = 118) epididymal spermatozoa. No significant differences were observed in the parameters of spermatozoa used either freshly or frozen-thawed. In the fresh epididymal sperm group 59.4% of all the injected oocytes fertilized normally as compared to 56.2% of all injected oocytes in the frozen-thawed epididymal sperm group, and embryonic development was comparable between the two groups. A total of 245 transfers were performed: 145 after the use of fresh epididymal spermatozoa and 100 after the use of frozen-thawed spermatozoa. The overall pregnancy rate per ICSI cycle was significantly lower when frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa were used (26.3 versus 39.5%). However, no significant differences were found either in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates or in implantation rates. There were no differences in pregnancy outcome. In patients suspected of having obstructive azoospermia with no work-up or an incomplete one, MESA is the preferred method for sperm recovery because a full scrotal exploration can be performed and, whenever indicated, a vasoepididymostomy may be performed concomitantly. Recovery of epididymal spermatozoa for cryopreservation during a diagnostic procedure is certainly a valid option in these patients since ICSI may be performed later or even in another centre using the frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa without jeopardizing the ICSI success rate.     

附睾穿刺取精行ICSI治疗梗阻性无精子症

目的探讨附睾穿刺取精术(PESA)结合单精子卵胞浆内注射(ICSI)治疗梗阻性无精子症男性不育的可行性,并观察其临床效果。方法 7对夫妇为研究对象,男方均确诊为梗阻性无精子症,女方超促排卵获得卵细胞,男方于取卵日在局麻下通过细针穿刺附睾头部吸取少量精子,行ICSI,受精成功后24-48h,选择优质胚胎移植入子宫腔。因男性少弱精子症行ICSI治疗的20个治疗周期为对照组。结果附睾取精7例共11个治疗周期全部获得活动精子,ICSI后受精率65．9％,卵裂率98．3％,优质胚胎率71．9％,临床妊娠5例,周期临床妊娠率45．5％,与对照组比较,各项指标均无显著差异。结论附睾穿刺取得的精子与排出体外的精子具有相同的受精和获得优质胚胎的能力,PESA是治疗梗阻性无精子症男性不育的安全有效的方法。     

Congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens, cystic fibrosis mutation analysis and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with fresh and frozen-thawed surgically retrieved spermatozoa from men diagnosed with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD). Twenty-seven azoospermic men with their partners were treated [25 with CBAVD and two with clinical cystic fibrosis (CF)]. CF gene mutation analysis and genetic counselling was provided. Spermatozoa were aspirated by microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA), percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) or open testis biopsy. Of the men with CBAVD, 60% carried a single mutation, 20% were compound heterozygotes, and 20% had no CF mutation identified. Of the 28 sperm aspiration procedures, 86% had supplementary spermatozoa for cryopreservation with 83% of those samples assessed as satisfactory when thawed. Of 29 cycles with fresh spermatozoa a fertilization rate of 76% of oocytes injected and 17% embryo implantation rate occurred. Twenty-four cycles in which cryopreserved spermatozoa were used resulted in an oocyte fertilization rate of 69% and embryo implantation rate of 20%. Eighteen clinical pregnancies occurred with 14 live births without congenital anomaly. Two pregnancies were achieved following pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. It is concluded that the presence of CF mutations in the male partner does not compromise in-vitro fertilization treatment outcomes or the opportunity for healthy live births.     

Fertilization and pregnancy outcome with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for azoospermic men

The evident ability of the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedure to achieve high fertilization and pregnancy rates regardless of semen characteristics has induced its application with spermatozoa surgically retrieved from azoospermic men. Here, ICSI outcome was analysed in 308 cases according to the cause of azoospermia; four additional cycles were with cases of necrozoospermia. All couples were genetically counselled and appropriately screened. Spermatozoa were retrieved by microsurgical epididymal aspiration or from testicular biopsies. Epididymal obstructions were considered congenital (n = 138) or acquired (n = 103), based on the aetiology. Testicular sperm cases were assessed according to the presence (n = 14) or absence (n = 53) of reproductive tract obstruction. The fertilization rate using fresh or cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa was 72.4% of 911 eggs for acquired obstructions, and 73.1% of 1524 eggs for congenital cases; with clinical pregnancy rates of 48.5% (50/103) and 61.6% (85/138) respectively. Spermatozoa from testicular biopsies fertilized 57.0% of 533 eggs in non-obstructive cases compared to 80.5% of 118 eggs (P = 0.0001) in obstructive azoospermia. The clinical pregnancy rate was 49.1% (26/53) for non-obstructive cases and 57.1% (8/14) for testicular spermatozoa obtained in obstructive azoospermia, including three established with frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa. In cases of obstructive azoospermia, fertilization and pregnancy rates with epididymal spermatozoa were higher than those achieved using spermatozoa obtained from the testes of men with non-obstructive azoospermia.     

High fertilization and pregnancy rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with spermatozoa obtained from testicle biopsy

In cases requiring microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration(MESA) for congenital absence of the vas deferens (CAVD) orirreparable obstructive azoospermia, often no spermatozoa canbe retrieved from the epididymis, or there may even be no epididymispresent. We wished to see whether testicular biopsy with testicularsperm extraction (TESE) in such cases could yield spermatozoathat would result in successful fertilization and pregnancy(despite the absence of epididymal spermatozoa) using intracytoplasmicsperm injection (ICSI). In the same setting during the same2-week period, 28 patients with CAVD or irreparable obstructionwere treated; 16 consecutive fresh MESA—ICSI cycles and12 cycles which required testicular biopsy with testicular spermextraction (TESE—ICSI) were performed. Normal two-pronuclearfertilization rates were similar in both groups: 45% for epididymalspermatozoa and 46% for testicular biopsy-extracted spermatozoa.Cleavage rates were also similar (68% for epididymal and 65%for testicular spermatozoa). The ongoing pregnancy rates inthis series were 50 and 43% respectively. We conclude that epididymalspermatozoa and testicular spermatozoa yield similar fertilization,cleavage and ongoing pregnancy rates using ICSI. When epididymalspermatozoa cannot be retrieved, a testicular biopsy can beperformed and the few barely motile spermatozoa thus obtainedcan be used for ICSI. It appears that all cases of obstructiveazoospermia can now be successfully treated.     

Factors influencing the outcome of ICSI in patients with obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: Factors influencing success of sperm retrieval in azoospermic patients and outcome of ICSI were evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Uni- and multifactorial analysis were performed using logistic and stepwise analysis, following surgical sperm retrieval by percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (55 cycles) or testicular sperm extraction (142 cycles) in 52 and 123 patients with obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) respectively. ICSI cycles using fresh or cryopreserved-thawed sperm were included. Sperm were retrieved to allow ICSI in 100 and 41% of OA and NOA patients, with no significant correlation with patients' age or FSH level. Occurrence of pregnancy was significantly correlated with female age (90th quantile: 38 years), number of oocytes retrieved (10th quantile: five oocytes) and number of oocytes injected (10th quantile: four oocytes). Sperm origin (epididymal versus testicular), status (fresh or thawed), male partner's age, and serum FSH had no significant effect upon implantation rate, pregnancy rate per embryo transfer or spontaneous miscarriage rate. CONCLUSIONS: In OA patients ICSI should be planned in conjunction with surgical sperm retrieval. In contrast, the lack of efficient non-invasive parameters to predict sperm retrieval in NOA suggests that elective surgical sperm retrieval may be offered to these patients prior to ovarian stimulation of their partners, especially when donor back-up is not an alternative. Female factors such as age and ovarian reserve have significant impact upon clinical success rates.     

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia

We compared the results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in: (i) obstructive versus non-obstructive azoospermia, (ii) obstructive azoospermia using epididymal versus testicular spermatozoa and (iii) acquired versus congenital obstructive azoospermia due to congenital absence of the vas deferens (CAVD). A retrospective analysis was done of 241 consecutive ICSI cycles done in 103 patients with non- obstructive azoospermia and 119 patients with obstructive azoospermia. In the obstructive group, 135 ICSI cycles were performed. Epididymal spermatozoa were used in 44 cycles and testicular spermatozoa in 91 cycles. In the non-obstructive group, 106 cycles were performed. The fertilization and pregnancy per cycle rates were 59.5 and 27.3% respectively using epididymal spermatozoa, 54.4 and 31.9% respectively using testicular spermatozoa in obstructive cases, and 39 and 11.3% respectively in non-obstructive cases. The fertilization and pregnancy per cycle rates were 56.6 and 37% respectively in acquired obstructive cases, and 55.2 and 20.4% respectively in CAVD. In conclusion, ICSI using spermatozoa from patients with acquired obstructive azoospermia resulted in significantly higher fertilization and pregnancy rates as compared to CAVD and non-obstructive cases.      

Sperm retrieval and fertilization in repeated percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration

Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) for retrievalof spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) isa new simplified technique in the treatment of men with obstructiveazoospermia. There has been a fear that the PESA procedure,being blind, could cause damage to the epididymal duct systemand make it impossible to retrieve spermatozoa if a repeatedprocedure is required. We report here on repeated PESA proceduresfrom the same unilateral epididymis. Twenty-seven men with obstructiveazoospermia were investigated retrospectively regarding sufficiencyof the number of motile spermatozoa for ICSI, fertilizationrate (FR) and possibility of collecting spermatozoa for cryopreservationin repeated PESA procedures. Sufficient motile spermatozoa forICSI were found in a similar proportion of men at the firsttwo attempts: 91 and 89% respectively. Fertilization rate andthe possibility of collecting spermatozoa for cryo-preservationwere also similar at the first two PESA procedures: 62 versus67% and 33 versus 33% respectively. At the third procedure,motile spermatozoa for ICSI were retrieved in 86% (6/7), FRwas 47% and spermatozoa were cryopreserved in one case. Twomen underwent a fourth PESA. In both cases, a sufficient numberof motile spermatozoa for ICSI was found and FR was 62%. Thisstudy shows that in men with obstructive azoospermia, PESA canbe repeated on the same unilateral epididymis up to three times,with good opportunity of retrieving sufficient motile spermatozoafor ICSI.     

Genetics: The use of epididymal and testicular spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the genetic implications for male infertility

The results and rationale of using testicular and epididymalspermatozoa with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) forsevere cases of male infertility are reviewed. A total of 72consecutive microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA)cases were performed for congenital absence of the vas (CAV)and for irreparable obstructive azoospermia. ICSI was used toobtain normal embryos for transfer and fertilization in 90%of the cases. The overall fertilization rate was 46% with anormal cleavage rate of 68%. The pregnancy and delivery ratesper transfer were 58 and 37% respectively. The delivery rateper cycle was 33%. In many cases, no epididymal spermatozoawere available and so testicular sperm extraction (TESE) wasused for sperm retrieval. The transfer rate was lower with TESE(84 versus 96%) and the spermatozoa could not be frozen andsaved for use in future cycles. However, there was little differencein pregnancy rates using epidiymal or testicular spermatozoa.The results were not affected by whether the obstruction wascaused by CAV or failed vasoepididymostomy. Both fresh and frozenspermatozoa gave similar results; the only significant factorappeared to be the age of the female. Because of the consistentlygood results obtained using epididymal sperm with ICSI whencompared with conventional IVF, and the similarly good resultswith testicular tissue spermatozoa, ICSI is mandatory for allfuture MESA patients. All CAV patients and their partners shouldbe offered genetic screening for cystic fibrosis; hence pre-implantationembryo diagnosis should be available in any full service MESAprogramme. It is now clear that even with non-obstructive azoospermia,e.g. Sertoli-cell only, or maturation arrest, there are usuallysome small foci of spermatogenesis which allow TESE with ICSIto be carried out. This means that even in men with azoospermiadue to absence of spermatogenesis or to a block in meiosis,there are usually a few spermatozoa available in the testesthat are adequate for successful ICSI. Finally, it is likelythat some forms of severe male factor infertility are geneticallytransmitted and although ICSI offspring have been shown to becompletely normal, it is possible that the sons of these infertilecouples will also require ICSI when they grow up and wish tohave a family.     

Surgical sperm recovery for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: which method is to be preferred?

Different methods for recovering epididymal or testicular spermatozoa have been described and each has its drawbacks and advantages. Percutaneous aspiration of the testis may be the method of choice in cases of irreparable obstructive azoospermia. Using a 21-gauge needle, spermatozoa may be recovered in 96 % of patients. More patients undergoing fine-needle aspiration experienced less pain than expected as compared with those undergoing open biopsy. Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) is the preferred method in patients with an incomplete work-up because, if indicated, a vasoepididymostomy can be performed concomitantly with a full scrotal exploration. In azoospermic patients with testicular failure, the sperm recovery rate, i.e. the chance of finding at least one spermatozoon, is around 50% after multiple open biopsies. However, the fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are significantly lower than in men with normal spermatogenesis, and complete fertilization failure may occur more frequently. Although the combination of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and ICSI may be the sole treatment available for infertility because of non-obstructive azoospermia, the overall success rate is limited and ongoing pregnancies are obtained in < or =20% of ICSI cycles. In patients with incomplete Sertoli cell-only syndrome, testicular damage may be limited by use of a selective microsurgical approach; less invasive methods such as fine-needle aspiration are not useful in these patients. Of 14 patients with primary testicular failure as proven by histopathology, only in one case (7.1%) were spermatozoa recovered by multiple aspirations, while in nine cases (64.3%) spermatozoa were recovered by open biopsy. Although the pregnancy rates reported after ICSI with frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa from patients with primary testicular failure are relatively low, the recovery of testicular spermatozoa by open biopsy followed by cryopreservation may be the method of choice by which to prevent repeat surgery and pointless ovarian stimulation in the female partner.     

Studies of percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Four distinct studies were carried out using two data sets ofpercutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) and intracytoplasmicsperm injection (ICSI) procedures performed from March 1993to January 1997. In study A, an analysis of 181 ICSI treatmentcycles following PESA revealed a successful epididymal spermretrieval rate of 83%. It confirmed that PESA is an effectivesperm retrieval method and the associated ICSI pregnancy rate(35% per embryo transfer) compared favourably with that of othersperm retrieval methods. In study B, the relevance of a priordiagnostic PESA procedure was ascertained by comparing the spermretrieval rates in two groups of patients having their firstICSI treatment cycle with spermatozoa retrieved through PESA.Group B1 (n=50) had diagnostic PESA prior to the ICSI treatmentcycle PESA procedure, unlike patients in group B2 (n=64) whodid not. The sperm retrieval rate in the treatment cycle procedurewas not different at 90 and 82.8% for groups B1 and B2 respectively.However, the discontinuation of diagnostic PESA is fraught withproblems including liability to medico-legal sanctions. In studyC, analysis of 177 treatment cycles involving PESA and ICSIrevealed a successful sperm retrieval rate by PESA of 82% inthe first cycle, 93% in the second, 96% in the third and 100%in the fourth cycle. The same trend was evident when sperm retrievalwas examined in relation to each of the epididymides. Retrievedspermatozoa were found to be motile in 67-100% of cases andthe frequency of samples containing motile spermatozoa did notdecrease with increase in the number of PESA attempts. Theseresults show that PESA does not jeopardize future epididymalsperm retrieval. In study D, the outcome of treatment with ICSIusing ejaculated spermatozoa (305 cycles) (group D1) was comparedwith that of ICSI using spermatozoa obtained through PESA (54cycles) (group D2). The median age of women in the two groupsof couples was similar (34 years). In group D1, 70% of metaphaseII oocytes were fertilized compared with 61% in group D2 (P<0.01).The cleavage rate and the median numbers of transferred andcryopreserved embryos were similar in both groups. There wasno significant difference between the clinical pregnancy rates(33 and 42% in groups D1 and D2 respectively). Our results showthat the outcome of PESA-ICSI treatment compared favourablywith that of ICSI using ejaculated spermatozoa.     

Outcome of in-vitro culture of fresh and frozen-thawed human testicular spermatozoa

The effect of in-vitro culture on the motility and morphology of fresh and frozen-thawed human testicular spermatozoa obtained from obstructive azoospermic patients and on the motility of testicular spermatozoa obtained from non-obstructive azoospermic patients was evaluated. The outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with fresh and frozen-thawed human testicular spermatozoa was studied. The results showed that significant improvement of sperm morphology and motility was observed in culture of fresh (n = 17) and frozen-thawed (n = 15) testicular sperm samples obtained from patients with obstructive azoospermia. The motility of cultured testicular spermatozoa reached a peak at 72 h without the need for special media. In six of 20 samples obtained from patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, improvement of sperm motility was observed. When only non-motile testicular spermatozoa were cultured, they all remained non-motile (n = 9). In patients with obstructive azoospermia, fertilization rates of 80 and 81% were obtained using ICSI with fresh and frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa respectively. Clinical pregnancies were observed in four out of nine patients with fresh testicular spermatozoa and two out of five patients after using frozen-thawed spermatozoa. When fresh testicular spermatozoa obtained from patients with non-obstructive azoospermia were used for ICSI, the fertilization rate was 68% and two out of seven patients achieved clinical pregnancies. In conclusion, the morphology and motility of fresh and frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa in patients with obstructive azoospermia can be significantly improved after in-vitro culture. The outcome of in-vitro culture of testicular spermatozoa in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia is unpredictable. In-vitro culture of non-motile testicular spermatozoa is not successful so far. The outcome of ICSI with fresh and with frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa was similar.      

新鲜附睾精子与冷冻复苏后的附睾精子临床结局比较

目的探讨经皮附睾穿刺取精术（PESA）获得精子经冷冻复苏后行卵胞浆内单精子注射术（ICSI）的临床效果。方法将采用新鲜附睾精子的94例患者作为新鲜组对照,冷冻复苏后附睾精子的92例患者作为冻精组,比较二组的受精率,可利用胚胎率及妊娠率。结果新鲜组与冻精组相比受精率,可利用胚胎率及妊娠率无显著性差异（75.04%vs78.4%,78.3%vs81.3%,47.87%vs44.44%P〉0.05）。结论PESA精子经冷冻后有很好的复苏率（97.94%）,结合ICSI可得到与使用新鲜PESA精子同样的临床结局,可作为梗阻性无精症的治疗方法。     

The mini-micro-epididymal sperm aspiration for sperm retrieval: a study of urological outcomes

Epididymal sperm aspiration and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection is an established treatment for obstructive azoospermia. Sperm aspiration is performed with either an incision or percutaneously. To control costs, minimize morbidity and retain the advantages of both approaches, we developed a mini-incision technique for epididymal aspiration and here report sperm retrieval and procedure-related outcomes. Twenty-six consecutive patients with obstructive azoospermia underwent epididymal sperm retrieval through a 1 cm incision with local anaesthesia to provide spermatozoa for concurrent IVF cycles. The quality of retrieved spermatozoa, the quantity of spermatozoa cryopreserved as well as anaesthetic requirement, recovery time and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Fresh epididymal spermatozoa were retrieved in 25 of 26 (96%) patients. In one patient, testicular sperm extraction was necessary. Excess motile spermatozoa were cryopreserved in 24 of 26 (92%) patients; a mean total motile count of 4.8x10(6) motile spermatozoa were banked. The procedure was performed with 62% of patients receiving minimal i.v. sedation. Post-procedure recovery was rapid, with a median time to return to work of 2.0 days with a median of 2.0 pain pills taken. Procedure-related satisfaction was high. The mini-micro-epididymal sperm aspiration achieves the goals of reliable retrieval of abundant epididymal spermatozoa with a single, minimally morbid procedure. It appears to combine the advantages of the incision and percutaneous approaches.      

Testicular needle biopsy, open biopsy, epididymal aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive azoospermia

Testicular or epididymal spermatozoa were obtained for in-vitrofertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection ICSI) in27 cycles out of 33 (in six men the azoospermia proved to havetesticular causes). Testicular needle biopsy carried out inaddition to surgical open biopsy proved to be an effective methodto obtain spermatozoa for ICSI from patients with obstructiveazoospermia. Thus it might be possible to replace scrotal operationsby simple needle biopsies. Embryos resulting from ICSI withtesticular spermatozoa were used in 19 transfers that resultedin six pregnancies. One pregnancy resulted from six embryo transfersfrom ICSI after microsurgical-epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA).The normal fertilization rates with testicular (37.3%) and MESAspermatozoa (53.7%) did not differ significantly from each other,but with testicular spermatozoa the rate was significantly lowerthan that obtained with ejaculated spermatozoa and ICSI (59.7%)in the matched couples. The abnormal fertilization of oocyteswith one pronucleus was significantly higher with testicularspermatozoa than with ejaculated spermatozoa in the controlcouples.     

Comparison of the fertilizing capability of spermatozoa from ejaculates, epididymal aspirates and testicular biopsies using intracytoplasmic sperm injection

A prospective study was carried out to compare the fertilizing capability and pregnancy outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using spermatozoa obtained from ejaculates, or surgically from epididymis or seminiferous tubules. A total of 77 ICSI cycles (one per patient) was included. In all, 28 patients had severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia, 19 patients had obstructive azoospermia and 30 patients had non-obstructive azoospermia. The main outcome measures were fertilization rate per injected metaphase II oocyte and the clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transferred back to the female recipients. In patients with severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia, the fertilization and pregnancy rates were 79 and 25 %. In patients with obstructive azoospermia, for whom epididymal spermatozoa were used, these were 75 and 28%, and in the non-obstructive group for which testicular spermatozoa were used for injection, they were 69 and 21% respectively. These rates were not significantly different in the three groups (P = 0.85 and P = 0.14 respectively), suggesting that spermatozoa from the ejaculates and epididymal or testicular biopsies are able to fertilize equally by using ICSI. Live birth per embryo transfer was significantly reduced in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia compared to the other two groups. The high abortion rate (50%) in the group in which testicular spermatozoa were used raises doubts about the developmental competence of such embryos.      

Testicular sperm retrieval and cryopreservation prior to initiating ovarian stimulation as the first line approach in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.

The potency for fertilization and successful implantation was compared between fresh and cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa obtained from the same patient with non-obstructive azoospermia. Spermatozoa cryopreserved at the outset were also evaluated. Non-obstructive azoospermic men (n = 55) underwent testicular sperm extraction (TESE); mature spermatozoa were found in 33 (60%) of them. Of 57 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in 25 patients, 15 used fresh spermatozoa (14 patients, group 1), 24 used the excess spermatozoa cryopreserved after 'fresh' ICSI (11 couples who did not conceive in the 'fresh' cycle, group 2) and 18 cycles used cryopreserved spermatozoa at the outset (11 other patients, group 3). Fertilization, cleavage, embryo quality, implantation and take home baby rates were not significantly different in groups 1 and 2, and 6/14 couples ultimately had healthy babies (42.8% cumulative take home baby rate per TESE). In group 3, neither the fertilization rate, embryo development, pregnancy nor implantation rates per embryo transfer were significantly different from groups 1 and 2. The cumulative delivery and ongoing pregnancy rate in this group was 36. 4%. Cryopreservation did not impair the availability of motile spermatozoa for ICSI. When immotile spermatozoa were injected, however, fertilization rate decreased dramatically. Since criteria for predicting the presence of spermatozoa in the testicular tissue of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia are inadequate, it is suggested that TESE be performed prior to initiating ovarian stimulation.