Altered intragraft immune responses and improved renal function in MHC class II-deficient mouse kidney allografts

BACKGROUND: During renal allograft rejection, expression of MHC class II antigens is up-regulated on the parenchymal cells of the kidney. This up-regulation of MHC class II proteins may stimulate the intragraft alloimmune response by promoting their recognition by recipient CD4+ T cells. In previous studies, absence of donor MHC class II antigens did not affect skin graft survival, but resulted in prolonged survival of cardiac allografts. METHODS: To further explore the role of MHC class II antigens in kidney graft rejection, we performed vascularized kidney transplants using donor kidneys from A(beta)b-deficient mice that lack MHC class II expression. RESULTS: At 4 weeks after transplant, GFR was substantially depressed in control allografts (2.18+/-0.46 ml/min/kg) compared to nonrejecting isografts (7.98+/-1.62 ml/min/kg; P<0.01), but significantly higher in class II- allografts (4.38+/-0.60 ml/min/kg; P<0.05). Despite the improvement in renal function, class II- allograft demonstrated histologic features of acute rejection, not unlike control allografts. However, morphometric analysis at 1 week after transplantation demonstrated significantly fewer CD4+ T cells infiltrating class II- allografts (12.8+/-1.2 cells/mm2) compared to controls (25.5+/-2.6 cells/mm2; P=0.0007). Finally, the intragraft profile of cytokines was altered in class II- allografts, with significantly reduced expression of Th2 cytokine mRNA compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: These results support a role of MHC class II antigens in the kidney regulating immune cells within the graft. Further, effector pathways triggered by class II antigens promote renal injury during rejection.     

Lack of correlation between the induction of donor class I and class II major histocompatibility complex antigens and graft rejection

The induction of donor major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens on nonrejected and rejected rat renal allografts was compared at various times after transplantation in two strain combinations, DA-to-PVG and LEW-to-DA. Graft rejection was prevented by preoperative donor-specific blood transfusion (DST). Quantitative absorption analysis and immunohistology were performed using monoclonal antibodies specific for donor class I and class II MHC antigens. A significant increase in the expression of donor MHC antigens, both class I and class II, was demonstrated on nonrejected as well as rejected kidneys after transplantation. A kinetic analysis showed that induction of donor class I antigens was accelerated on the nonrejected grafts, and by day 5 the nonrejected kidneys showed increased expression of class I antigen when compared with the rejected grafts (a 37- vs. a 25-fold increase in expression). Increased expression of donor class I antigens persisted on the nonrejected grafts and was still detectable on long-term-surviving kidneys, 50 days after transplantation. The magnitude of class II antigen induction was similar on both rejected and nonrejected grafts (8-fold by 5 days after transplantation). Immunohistology demonstrated that class I and class II antigens were induced on identical structures in the kidney in both situations. In particular the vessel endothelia, which do not express class II antigens in normal kidney, become strongly positive in both rejected and nonrejected grafts 5 days after transplantation. Although renal allograft rejection is completely suppressed in rats given a single donor-specific blood transfusion before transplantation, graft survival cannot be explained by the lack of induction of donor MHC antigens. Donor MHC antigens are induced on these nonrejected kidney grafts, and therefore they could act as target molecules for the effector cells that mediate graft destruction. Thus the induction of donor MHC antigens on tissue allografts should not be considered as indicative of a rejection response resulting in graft destruction.     

Induction of Cardiac Allograft Tolerance Across a Full MHC Barrier in Miniature Swine by Donor Kidney Cotransplantation

We have previously shown that tolerance of kidney allografts across a full major histocompatibility complex (MHC) barrier can be induced in miniature swine by a 12‐day course of high‐dose tacrolimus. However, that treatment did not prolong survival of heart allografts across the same barrier. We have now tested the effect of cotransplanting an allogeneic heart and kidney from the same MHC‐mismatched donor using the same treatment regimen. Heart allografts (n = 3) or heart plus kidney allografts (n = 5) were transplanted into MHC‐mismatched recipients treated with high‐dose tacrolimus for 12 days. As expected, all isolated heart allografts rejected by postoperative day 40. In contrast, heart and kidney allografts survived for >200 days with no evidence of rejection on serial cardiac biopsies. Heart/kidney recipients lost donor‐specific responsiveness in cell‐mediated lympholysis and mixed‐lymphocyte reaction assays, were free of alloantibody and exhibited prolonged survival of donor, but not third‐party skin grafts. Late (>100 days) removal of the kidney allografts did not cause acute rejection of the heart allografts (n = 2) and did not abrogate donor‐specific unresponsiveness in vitro. While kidney‐induced cardiac allograft tolerance (KICAT) has previously been demonstrated across a Class I disparity, these data demonstrate that this phenomenon can also be observed across the more clinically relevant full MHC mismatch. Elucidating the renal element(s) responsible for KICAT could provide mechanistic information relevant to the induction of tolerance in recipients of isolated heart allografts as well as other tolerance‐resistant organs.     

Donor and recipient contributions of ICAM-1 and P-selectin in parenchymal rejection and graft arteriosclerosis: insights from double knockout mice.

BACKGROUND: Mice with target gene deletions were used in an immunosuppressed, heterotopic mouse cardiac transplant model to investigate the effects of simultaneous deficiencies of ICAM-1 and P-selectin on late cardiac rejection. METHODS: To determine the contribution of donor sources of ICAM-1 and P-selectin, ICAM-1/P-selectin gene deficient (I/P -/-) (n = 7) or wild type (n = 6) donor hearts were placed into CBA recipients. To study recipient sources of ICAM-1 and P-selectin, wild type donor hearts were placed into I/P -/- (n = 7) or wild type (n = 13) recipients. Recipients received a 30-day course of anti-CD4/8 mAb. RESULTS: I/P -/- donor allografts had prolonged survival (52-57 days) compared with wild type allografts (49-51 days). I/P -/- donor allografts underwent parenchymal rejection with mononuclear cell infiltration and developed alpha-smooth muscle actin positive vascular thickening (30 +/- 7% luminal occlusion, n = 78 vessels). Wild type allografts had parenchymal rejection with vascular medial necrosis and an absence of arteriosclerotic thickening (10 +/- 8%, n = 75, p = 0.008). Using the reverse combination, allografts from I/P -/- or wild type recipients had similar graft survival (50-57 days), comparable but variable degrees of parenchymal rejection, and comparable vascular occlusion (22 +/- 15% vs 28 +/- 19%, p = 0.442). CONCLUSION: We have shown that donor and recipient sources of ICAM-1 and P-selectin may have independent roles in leukocyte trafficking to the graft. Simultaneous interruption of donor ICAM-1 and P-selectin delays onset of parenchymal rejection. However, donor I/P deficiency permits arteriosclerotic development, perhaps by attenuating the alloimmune injury. In contrast, recipient deficiency alone does not altergraft outcomes suggesting that the donor is the critical site of ICAM-1 and P-selectin.     

Successful induction of long-term specific tolerance to fully allogeneic renal allografts in miniature swine.

Major histocompatibility complex class II matching is of overwhelming importance for achieving tolerance to kidney transplants (KTX) in miniature swine. When class II antigens are matched, long-term specific tolerance across complete MHC class I antigen barriers can uniformly be induced by a 12-day perioperative course of cyclosporine. This same regimen is ineffective in fully MHC-mismatched combinations. We hypothesized that initial induction of tolerance to kidney donor class II antigens by bone marrow transplantation might allow tolerance to be induced to a subsequent fully allogeneic KTX in combination with CsA therapy. We report here the results of such fully allogeneic KTX performed in 4 recipients of prior single-haplotype class II-mismatched BMT. All animals received KTX from donors class II matched to the BMT donor and received a 12-day course of intravenous CsA (10 mg/kg/day). All four animals have maintained normal serum creatinine values (less than 2.0 mg/dl) for greater than 200 days posttransplant. Specific hyporesponsiveness to both BMT and KTX donor-type MHC antigens was found in mixed lymphocyte culture and cell-mediated lympholysis assays. Compared with third-party grafts, significantly prolonged survival of BMT donor-specific (P = 0.031) and KTX donor-specific (P = 0.031) skin grafts was observed. These results demonstrate that induction of tolerance to class II antigens by BMT allows a short course of CsA to induce specific tolerance to fully allogeneic renal allografts.     

The failure of skin grafting to break tolerance to class I-disparate renal allografts in miniature swine despite inducing marked antidonor cellular immunity.

Long-term specific tolerance to one haplotype class I plus minor antigen disparate renal allografts develops without exogenous immunosuppression in approximately 35% of miniature swine (n = 128). Previous studies have suggested that this phenomenon is related to limited class I-specific helper T cell activity as evidenced by the failure of antibody class switching in vivo and the ability of exogenous interleukin 2 to elicit antidonor responses in vitro. To determine whether tolerance could be broken by inducing antidonor reactivity with donor antigen and a source of T cell help, multiple skin grafts bearing donor class I plus third-party class II antigens were placed on tolerant animals. Skin grafts were placed at least 3 months after the kidney transplant, at which time all recipients had normal renal function as measured by blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine. First-set rejection of skin grafts by SLAad and SLAdd hosts occurred in 11.8 +/- 1.1 days (mean +/- SEM, n = 6) and in 9.3 +/- 0.9 days (n = 4), respectively. Coincident with skin rejection, most animals developed a transient rise in BUN to 62 +/- 11 mg/dl (n = 10) and a similar rise in Cr to 4.9 +/- 1.2 mg/dl (n = 10), with normal levels returning in all animals within two weeks. Subsequent skin grafts with the same disparity did not undergo second-set rejection and did not induce BUN or Cr elevations. Prior to skin grafting, animals showed no antidonor activity in mixed lymphocyte reaction or cell-mediated lymphocytotoxicity assays. After two skin grafts, all animals developed donor-specific CML and secondary MLR responses, and additional skin grafts amplified this cellular immunity. Development of marked antidonor immunity without a break in tolerance suggested that either graft adaptation or local suppression might be involved in maintaining tolerance to class I MHC antigens. In preliminary studies, an immunized SLAad animal and an immunized SLAdd animal were retransplanted with kidneys MHC matched to their first allografts. In both cases, the second graft was accepted permanently without immunosuppression, suggesting that graft adaptation is not necessary for the maintenance of tolerance to renal allografts in miniature swine.     

Survival following liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patient and graft survival following transplantation with non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) hepatic allografts is equivalent to heart-beating-donor (HBD) allografts. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: With the growing disparity between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation and a limited supply of cadaveric organs, there is renewed interest in the use of hepatic allografts from NHBDs. Limited outcome data addressing this issue exist. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of graft and patient survival among adult recipients of NHBD hepatic allografts compared with recipients of HBD livers between 1993 and 2001 using the United Network of Organ Sharing database. RESULTS: NHBD (N = 144) graft survival was significantly shorter than HBD grafts (N = 26856). One- and 3-year graft survival was 70.2% and 63.3% for NHBD recipients versus 80.4% and 72.1% (P = 0.003 and P = 0.012) for HBD recipients. Recipients of an NHBD graft had a greater incidence of primary nonfunction (11.8 vs. 6.4%, P = 0.008) and retransplantation (13.9% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.04) compared with HBD recipients. Prolonged cold ischemic time and recipient life support were predictors of early graft failure among recipients of NHBD livers. Although differences in patient survival following NHBD versus HBD transplant did not meet statistical significance, a strong trend was evident that likely has relevant clinical implications. CONCLUSIONS: Graft and patient survival is inferior among recipients of NHBD livers. NHBD donors remain an important source of hepatic grafts; however, judicious use is warranted, including minimization of cold ischemia and use in stable recipients.     

Solitary renal allografts from pediatric cadaver donors less than 2 years of age transplanted into adult recipients

BACKGROUND: Transplantation of solitary pediatric renal allografts from donors 2 years of age or younger into adult recipients is controversial. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2001, 15 solitary renal allografts from pediatric donors 2 years of age or younger were transplanted into adult recipients. Thirty-three en bloc renal allografts transplanted between 1994 and 2001 were used for comparison. En bloc kidneys were considered for separation if they measured greater than or equal to 6 cm in length. Renal function (creatinine clearance [CrCl]) was estimated using the Cockroft-Gault formula. RESULTS: Two-year graft survival for the solitary and en bloc groups were 93% and 77%, respectively (P =0.405). Five grafts were lost because of arterial thrombosis (four en bloc and one solitary). Ureteral complications occurred in three grafts in the en bloc group. One-year postoperative CrCl of the surviving solitary (n=14) and en bloc (n=26) grafts were 51.4+/-26.2 mL/min and 55.1+/-27.5 mL/min (P >0.05), respectively. Donor weight and kidney length were greater in the solitary group (14.3+/-3.5 kg and 6.3+/-0.4 cm, respectively) compared with the en bloc group (10.8+/-2.6 kg and 5.9+/-0.3 cm, respectively) (P =0.001 and P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Separation of en bloc pairs into solitary allografts can be considered when the graft measures greater than or equal to 6 cm in length and donor weight is greater than or equal to 14 kg. The transplantation of solitary pediatric kidneys into adult recipients is successful, and the majority of pediatric en bloc allografts can be separated before transplantation.     

Impact of donor age on survival and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation using HCV+ allografts.

Studies have suggested that the use of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive (HCV+) donor allografts has no impact on survival. However, no studies have examined the effect that HCV+ donor histology has upon recipient and graft survival. We evaluated the clinical outcome and impact of histological features in HCV patients transplanted using HCV+ livers. We reviewed all patients transplanted for HCV at our institution from 1988 to 2004; 39 received HCV+ allografts and 580 received HCV-negative (HCV-) allografts. Survival curves compared graft and patient survival. Each HCV+ allograft was stringently matched to a control of HCV- graft recipients. No significant difference in survival was noted between recipients of HCV+ livers and controls. Patients receiving HCV+ allografts from older donors (age > or =50 yr) had higher rates of graft failure (hazard ratio, 2.74) and death rates (hazard ratio, 2.63) compared to HCV- allograft recipients receiving similarly-aged older donor livers. Matched case-control analysis revealed that recipients of HCV+ allografts had more severe fibrosis post-liver transplantation than recipients of HCV- livers (P = 0.008). More advanced fibrosis was observed in HCV+ grafts from older donors compared to HCV+ grafts from younger donors (P = 0.012). In conclusion, recipients of HCV+ grafts from older donors have higher rates of death and graft failure, and develop more extensive fibrosis than HCV- graft recipients from older donors. Recipients of HCV+ grafts, regardless of donor age, develop more advanced liver fibrosis than recipients of HCV- grafts.     

Wisconsin and Celsior solutions in renal preservation: a comparative preliminary study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Celsior (C) solution for flushing and cold storage of cadaveric renal allografts. Among 177 cadaveric renal allografts harvested and transplanted in our unit, 138 were preserved with the University of Wisconsin (W) solution and 39 with the C solution. The mean age of the recipients was 48.1 +/- 13.5 years, including 107 men and 70 women. The immunosuppressive regimens were tacrolimus-based (n = 118) or cyclosporine-based (n = 59). Grafts perfused with W solution were obtained from older donors than those perfused with C solution (42.3 +/- 16.9 vs 38.1 +/- 12.5 years; P = .017) and had been transplanted to older recipients (49.5 +/- 14.4 vs 43.3 +/- 13.0 years; P = .017). The prevalence of delayed graft function (DGF) was similar in the 2 groups (39.1% in the W group vs 23.7% in the C group; P = .097), as well as the incidence of primary nonfunction grafts (5.8% vs 2.7%; P = .427). The serum creatinine value at 1 month was significantly higher among grafts preserved with W versus solution (1.9 +/- 0.9 vs 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dL; P = .000) as well as at 12 months (1.63 +/- 0.5 vs 1.35 +/- 0.4 mg/dL; P = .003). There were no differences in graft survival at 12 months (97% C group vs 88% W group; P = .069). Our results showed that C solution was equivalent to W solution with respect to DGF and primary function of kidneys. The differences in renal function may have been due to differences in donor and recipient ages.     

Experimental pancreatic allotransplantation in large animals. The role of donor kidney and cyclosporine in modifying rejection

Experiments were carried out in outbred dogs and pigs to evaluate the relative immunogenicity of pancreatic islets and segmental pancreas grafts, and whether these could be ameliorated by transplanting a kidney simultaneously from the same donor animal. Various immunosuppressive regimens were also studied. Pancreatic islet allografts never normalized blood glucose in totally pancreatectomized recipients despite the use of cyclosporine (CsA) in high doses (40 mg/kg/day) and the simultaneous transplantation of a kidney from the same donor. These grafts which never "took" contrast sharply with the experience of pancreatic islet autografts prepared in the same way and inoculated into the spleen, which in all nine instances normalized blood glucose in pancreatectomized recipients. Segmental transplants were performed in swine with duct drainage into the jejunum. Totally pancreatectomized pigs died at 7.8 +/- 1.0 days. In recipients suppressed with low-dose azathioprine (Az) and prednisone (Pred) pancreas grafts alone were rejected in 12.9 +/- 10 days. Synchronous pancreas and kidney transplants treated similarly extended the mean survival of pancreatic grafts to 20 +/- 10 days--which, however, was not significant (P less than 0.1 greater than 0.05). Mean survival time of pancreatic grafts in recipients receiving CsA at 20 mg/kg/day and prednisone 1 mg/kg/day was 14 +/- 6.3 days. The combination of CsA 20 mg/kg/day, Az 2 mg/kg/day, and Pred 1 mg/kg/day prolonged the mean survival time to 39.8 +/- 22 days. These results allow us to conclude that: crude preparations of islet tissue invariably capable of normalizing blood sugar at day 4 when used as autografts failed to "take" despite the existence of alternative sources of antigen present in a well vascularized kidney from the same donor, and despite very high dosages of CsA; triple immunosuppressive therapy had synergistic effects on pancreatic allograft survival; and simultaneous transplantation of kidney and pancreas had little effect on survival times of the pancreas or the kidney.     

Postoperative administration of donor B cells induces rat kidney allograft acceptance: lack of association with Th2 cytokine expression in long-term accepted grafts

BACKGROUND: Although donor leukocytes are only thought to prolong survival when administered before transplantation, recent evidence shows that they are effective at transplantation. This study aims to identify the leukocyte subset that is most active in prolonging kidney allograft survival and examine the cytokine expression in long-term acceptance. METHODS: PVG rat kidneys were transplanted to completely MHC class I and class II-mismatched DA recipients. Donor B cells or T cells, purified by negative selection, were injected i.v. at the time of transplantation. Expression of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-10, interferon (IFN)-gamma, and transforming growth factor-beta mRNA was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Immunohistochemical analysis and terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) staining was used to identify infiltrating cells and apoptotic cells, respectively, in sections of kidney allografts. RESULTS: Median kidney graft survival time (MST) of B cell-treated animals (n=5) was >300 days, compared with 7 days in untreated animals (n=7) (P=0.003), whereas animals treated with the same number of T cells (n=6) had a MST of 17 days (P=0.1 vs. untreated, P=0.03 vs. B cell-treated). Examination of the long-term (>300 days) accepted grafts from B cell-treated recipients showed little evidence of kidney damage but a moderate perivascular infiltrate consisting of T and B cells. This infiltrate seemed to be quiescent because there was no detectable expression of IL-2 receptors or of apoptotic cells. It produced little or no cytokine mRNA, because expression in the long-term accepted grafts was similar to levels in normal kidneys or syngeneic transplants. There was a marked increase of cytokine mRNA early after transplantation in both leukocyte-treated and untreated grafts, with more rapid appearance of IFN-gamma and IL-10 in leukocyte-treated grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Donor B cells efficiently induce long-term acceptance of transplanted kidneys in a fully MHC-mismatched rat model when administered at transplantation, by a mechanism that seems to be independent of Th2 cytokine expression within the long-term accepted graft.     

Renal transplant survival from older donors: a single center experience

HYPOTHESIS: Despite the observation that kidney transplantations from older donors have an increased risk of failure, the percentage of kidney donors 55 years and older has increased. We explored the risk of allograft failure in a single transplantation center with older (55-79 years) vs younger (18-54 years) donors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort review with a mean follow-up of 32 months. SETTING: Academic transplant center. PATIENTS: Consecutive recipients (n = 324) of renal transplants from adult donors. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into 4 groups based on donor status (living or deceased) and donor age (< or =54 or > or =55 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Allograft survival and function, incidence of acute rejection. RESULTS: Recipients of older donor kidneys were significantly older (53.6 vs 43.6 years, P<.001). Seven allografts (12.7%) failed from 55 transplants from donors 55 years and older, compared with 41 allografts (15.2%) from 269 younger donors (P =.63). Renal function was superior following renal transplantation using younger donors (P =.004). However, renal function was acceptable in all groups, with a mean +/- SD serum creatinine level of 1.7 +/- 0.4 mg/dL (150 +/- 35 micro mol/L) among recipients of older donor kidneys. Allograft survival at 1, 2, and 3 years, censored for death with allograft function, did not differ when comparing older vs younger donors. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients receiving allografts from older donors do well. Older donor kidneys provide suitable renal function for many patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation.     

Immunologic consequences of combined pancreas-spleen transplantation in the rat

A rat model of combined pancreas-spleen transplantation (PST) was used in order to characterize the immunologic consequences of PST when compared to pancreas transplantation (PT) alone. Weakly MHC disparate Fischer (F344) PST grafts survived significantly longer in LEW recipients than did F344 PT grafts (17.6 +/- 3.4 vs 12.1 +/- 1.0 days, respectively, P less than 0.001). However, graft versus host disease (GVHD) occurred regularly in the PST recipients. Similarly, in haploidentical LBN to LEW donor-recipient pairs, PST graft survival was also modestly but significantly increased over that of the PT controls (10.6 +/- 1.0 vs 8.5 +/- 0.8 days, respectively, P less than 0.001). Conversely, in the ACI to LEW combination where MCH differences are very strong, PST graft survival was not longer than PT controls (7.5 +/- 0.8 vs 7.0 +/- 0.6 days, respectively, P greater than 0.2). GVHD was not observed in either of the latter two experiments. Short-term immunosuppression with cyclosporine further improved the outcome in LEW recipients of F344 grafts by inducing long-term graft survivals in approximately one-fourth of the PST recipients. Host splenectomy did not improve graft survival in PST recipients but did increase the risk of GVHD in LEW recipients of F344 PST grafts. Graft irradiation prior to transplantation with 500 rad not only abrogated the GVHD potential of the F344 PST graft but also eliminated the graft survival prolonging effect of the donor spleen. Donor spleen cells injected at the time of PT in F344 to LEW transplants resulted in graft prolongation not different from spleen intact PST recipients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-term outcomes of single paediatric vs. ideal adult renal allograft transplants in adult recipients

AIM: To compare the outcomes of single paediatric vs. adult kidneys transplanted into adult recipients. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre review of 38 single cadaver kidney transplants from donors less than five yr of age to wait-listed patients of low body mass index (BMI). Survival of grafts and quality of renal function were compared with 121 similarly low BMI recipients of grafts from donors 18-45 yr of age that were transplanted during the same period. Immunosuppression consisted of sirolimus, minimal-dose cyclosporine and prednisone. The mean age of the paediatric vs. adult donors was 2.8+/-1.0 and 31.1+/-9.2 yr, respectively (p<0.01) and of the recipients, 42.0+/-12.4 and 45.7+/-14.8 yr, respectively (p=NS). The mean BMI of paediatric vs. adult donor kidney recipients was 21.8+/-2.9 and 22.4+/-2.0 kg/m2 (p=NS). Sixty-six per cent of paediatric donor recipients were women compared with 44% of adult donor recipients (p=0.03). RESULTS: Death censored actuarial graft survivals at one and five yr for recipients of paediatric vs. adult donor grafts were 93 and 84% compared with 93 and 85% (p=NS). There were no graft losses because of technical complications in the paediatric kidney donor group. At one and five yr post-transplantation, the mean estimated creatinine clearances of the paediatric donor graft recipients were 52.9+/-19.6 and 54.0+/-17.8 mL/min, respectively, compared with 56.4+/-19.8 and 49.1+/-21.7 mL/min for recipients of adult donor grafts at the same times (p=NS). CONCLUSION: Transplantation of single paediatric donor kidneys into low BMI adult recipients provided equivalent outcomes to those of grafts from adult donors between the ages of 18 and 45 yr.     

The effect of thymectomy on tolerance induction and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in a miniature swine heart/kidney transplantation model.

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated that MHC class I disparate hearts transplanted into miniature swine treated with a short course of cyclosporine developed florid cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and were rejected within 55 days. However, when a donor-specific kidney is cotransplanted with the heart allograft, recipients become tolerant to donor antigen and accept both allografts long-term without the development of CAV. In the present study, we have investigated the role of the host thymus in the induction of tolerance and prevention of CAV in heart/kidney recipients. METHODS: Total thymectomies were performed in six animals (postoperative day [POD]-21), which on day 0 received either an isolated MHC class I disparate heart allograft (n=3) or combined class I disparate heart and kidney allografts (n=3), followed in both cases by a 12-day course of cyclosporine (POD 0-11). Graft survival and the development of CAV in these thymectomized recipients were compared to the same parameters in non-thymectomized, cyclosporine-treated recipients bearing either class I disparate heart allografts (n=5) or heart and kidney allografts (n=4). RESULTS: In the group of animals bearing isolated class I disparate heart allografts, the thymectomized recipients rejected their allografts earlier (POD 8, 22, 27) than the non-thymectomized recipients (POD 33,35,45,47,55). The donor hearts in both the thymectomized and non-thymectomized animals developed florid CAV. In the group of animals bearing combined class I disparate heart and kidney allografts, the nonthymectomized recipients accepted both donor organs long term with no evidence of CAV. In contrast, none of the thymectomized heart/kidney recipients survived >100 days, and they all developed the intimal proliferation of CAV. CONCLUSION: Thymic-dependent mechanisms are necessary for the induction of acquired tolerance and prevention of CAV in porcine heart/kidney recipients.     

Donor-specific antigen and cyclosporine in rat islet allografts

Combination therapy with one dose of 3 M KCl extracted donor-soluble antigen (Ag) and a short course of cyclosporine (CsA) has proven to prolong the survival of kidney allografts by enhancing specific T-suppressor populations. This regimen is tested in rat islet allografts in this study (Lewis to ACI). A 3-day perioperative course of 10 mg/kg/day CsA on Days -1, 0, and 1 did not prolong graft survival (MST = 10.7 +/- 2.5 days vs 9.4 +/- 1.2 days in controls). When this course of CsA therapy was combined with a single dose of donor antigen on Day -1, the survival time was prolonged slightly but significantly (MST = 14.0 +/- 5.8 days). Three cycles of a 3-day course of CsA therapy at 7-day intervals, a total of nine doses of 10 mg/kg/day CsA, were effective in delaying rejection of islet allografts (MST = 26.4 +/- 30.3). Moreover, combined therapy with donor antigen and three cycles of a 3-day course of CsA prolonged the survival of islet allografts (MST = 57.7 +/- 51.4 days) with 50% of recipients still normoglycemic at 60 days after transplantation. These findings indicate that the combination therapy of donor antigen with a short course of CsA has a powerful effect to prevent the rejection of islet allografts, as shown in kidney allografts, in rats.     

Orthotopic liver allografts in the rat. The influence of strain combination on the fate of the graft

This report describes the fate of orthotopic liver allografts performed in 22 donor/recipient strain combinations. Of these, 2 were major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-congenic, 18 were fully allogeneic, and 2 were non-RT1 incompatible combinations considered to differ only in minor transplantation antigens. The fate of fully allogeneic liver grafts was strictly dependent on the donor/recipient strain combination, and survival times fell into three nonoverlapping groups corresponding to acute rejection (8-21 days), delayed rejection (28-63 days), and prolonged survival (greater than 100 days). Serial levels of recipient serum enzymes also fell into groups corresponding to the fate of the graft. In 7 fully allogeneic donor/recipient combinations, liver grafts showed very prolonged survival. In five combinations they were rejected almost as quickly as kidney or heart grafts. In the two MHC congenic combinations, liver grafts survived for prolonged periods. In the non-RT1-incompatible combinations, unexpectedly, PVG livers were rejected by AUG recipients. MHC-incompatible liver grafts of a given strain survived for long periods or were rejected (in acute or delayed fashion) depending on the recipient strain. This behavior is unique to liver amongst commonly transplanted vascularized organs, and the fate of the graft clearly indicates strain-dependent levels of recipient responsiveness to defined transplantation antigens. Independent evidence supporting this conclusion is discussed. Apparently anomalous results of liver grafting in certain strain combinations are briefly considered.     

Superiority of pediatric en bloc renal allografts over living donor kidneys: a long-term functional study

BACKGROUND: Growing waiting list for kidney transplantation in the United States makes it imperative to expand donor pool to use of pediatric kidneys. Because en bloc pediatric kidneys double nephron numbers, it would be interesting to learn how they fare compared to living donor kidneys long term. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on all 72 pediatric en bloc and 75 live adult donor kidney recipients transplanted between January 1990 and December 2001. Long term graft function was assessed with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. RESULTS: Pediatric donor was 16.9 +/- 11.2 months old and weighed 10.7 +/- 3.8 kg. Nine en bloc kidneys thrombosed at a mean of 4.2 days posttransplantation. Proteinuria was detected later posttransplantation in en bloc group (45.6 +/- 33.6 months vs. 23.4 +/- 16.3 months, P = 0.002). Pediatric en bloc recipients had significantly higher GFR up to 8 years posttransplantation. One-year graft survival was significantly better in live donor group (93.3% vs. 81.9%, P = 0.041) but five-year graft survival rates were similar (86.7% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.125). One-year and five-year patient survival rates were similar between en bloc and live donor groups (97.3% vs. 98.6%, P = 0.585 and 94.6% vs. 93.0%, P = 0.688, respectively). CONCLUSION: Early postoperative graft thrombosis remain a challenge with pediatric en bloc renal transplants, but once the allografts survive early postoperative course, they provide better long-term function than living donor kidney transplants. In order to alleviate burden on waiting list, pediatric en bloc kidneys should be transplanted more often when available.     

Intrathymic immunomodulation in sensitized rat recipients of cardiac allografts: requirements for allorecognition pathways.

BACKGROUND: Intrathymic injection of alloantigen in the form of donor cells, soluble major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, or MHC allopeptides induces donor-specific tolerance in a variety of acute allograft rejection models. We have previously shown that a single intrathymic injection of donor spleen cells into pre-sensitized rats abrogates accelerated (circa 24-hour) rejection and prolongs the survival of cardiac allografts to about 7 days. The present study was designed to investigate the mechanisms by which intrathymic administration of donor cells modifies the course of accelerated rejection. METHODS: Lewis RT1(1) (LEW) rats sensitized by transplantation with Wistar-Furth RT1(u) (WF) skin grafts received WF cardiac allografts 7 days later-a classic model of accelerated rejection. At the time of skin challenge, however, certain animals received intrathymic cell suspensions (either allogeneic or syngeneic) or donor-derived class I and/or class II MHC peptides. RESULTS: Control animals (sensitized by skin grafts but receiving no other treatment) rejected cardiac allografts within 24 hours. Intrathymic injection of WF splenocytes at the time of skin transplantation abrogated rejection at 24 hours and prolonged cardiac allograft survival to 6.6+/-0.6 days (p<0.001), whereas intrathymic administration of syngeneic (LEW) or allogeneic third party Brown Norway RT1(n) cells was ineffective in this regard. Intrathymic injection of gamma-irradiated donor cells marginally extended cardiac allograft survival to 3.0+/-0.9 days (p< 0.001), but the grafts were still rejected in an accelerated fashion. Intrathymic injection of donor-derived class I and/or class II MHC allopeptides at the same time period also failed to prolong cardiac allograft survival beyond 3 days. In the group receiving unmodified donor cells, elevated immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) allo-antibodies were found at the time of cardiac transplantation; this pattern was not observed with any other treatment. CONCLUSION: The superiority of non-modified donor spleen cells over gamma-irradiated donor cells or donor specific allopeptides in modifying the course of accelerated cardiac rejection suggests that direct allorecognition is the dominant pathway initiating rejection in sensitized transplant recipients. Marked alterations in the antidonor IgM and IgG responses are associated with successful abrogation of accelerated rejection by thymic immunomodulatory mechanisms.