Radiotherapeutic management of brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The management of brain metastases is a significant health care problem. An estimated 20-40% of cancer patients will develop metastatic cancer to the brain during the course of their illness. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized trials on adult cancer patients with single or multiple brain metastases from cancer of any histology was conducted. Eligible studies investigated external beam radiotherapy or radiosurgery in one of the study arms. Outcomes of interest included survival, intracranial progression-free duration, response of brain metastases to therapy, quality of life, symptom control, neurological function, and toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-seven trials were included in this systematic review of the evidence. Pooled results from three randomized trials of surgical excision combined with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) showed no improvement in overall survival as compared to WBRT alone in patients with single brain metastasis. One randomized study of postoperative WBRT following excision of a single brain metastasis versus surgery alone detected a significant reduction in intracranial tumour recurrence rates but no corresponding difference in overall survival. Nine trials of altered dose-fractionation schedules compared to a standard control fractionation schedule (3000 cGy in 10 fractions) of WBRT showed no difference in probability of survival at 6 months. The addition of radiosensitizers, as assessed in five trials, did not confer additional benefit to WBRT in terms of overall survival or the frequency of brain metastases response. Three trials examined the use of WBRT and radiosurgery boost versus WBRT alone in selected patients with brain metastases. Overall survival did not improve for patients with multiple brain metastases. However, one trial reported an improvement in survival for patients with single brain metastasis treated with WBRT and radiosurgery boost. One older randomized trial examined the use of WBRT versus supportive care alone (using oral prednisone). Results were not conclusive. CONCLUSION: For patients with a single brain metastasis, good performance status, and minimal or no evidence of extracranial disease, surgical excision and postoperative WBRT improves survival (as compared to WBRT alone). There may be a small survival advantage associated with the use of radiosurgery boost and WBRT as compared to WBRT alone in selected patients with a single brain metastasis. There is no difference in overall survival or in neurologic function improvement with the use of altered whole brain dose-fractionation schedules as compared to standard fractionation schedules (3000 cGy in 10 fractions or 2000 cGy in 5 fractions). There is no survival benefit associated with the use of radiosurgery boost and WBRT versus WBRT alone in patients with multiple brain metastases. Currently, neither chemotherapy nor radiosensitizers show a clear benefit in the objective parameters of survival and progression-free survival. For patients with poor performance status and active extracranial disease, steroids and supportive care are an option.     

Whole-brain radiotherapy and tumor bed radiosurgery following resection of solitary brain metastases

A standard approach to solitary brain metastases is resection followed by whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Despite WBRT, the tumor bed remains a common site of failure. We reviewed outcomes following adjuvant WBRT with tumor bed radiosurgery (SRS). We retrospectively identified patients having undergone neurosurgical resection of a single brain metastasis followed by adjuvant WBRT and tumor bed SRS. SRS dose selection was independent of target volume (10 Gy peripheral dose). Outcomes were calculated actuarially. Patients were censured for local control at the time of last imaging. From 2005 to 2008, 27 patients were treated with WBRT and tumor bed SRS. Median age was 58.7 years, median KPS 80%. The primary malignancy was non-small cell lung cancer in 70%. Median follow-up was 9.7 months. Following the combination of surgery, WBRT and SRS the median overall survival was 17.6 months. Actuarial 2-year local control was 94%. The SRS boost was well tolerated with one patient (4%) requiring reoperation for symptomatic radiation necrosis 16 months post treatment. Radiosurgery can be safely added to WBRT as an adjuvant treatment following resection of a single brain metastasis. In our retrospective series, this combination treatment produced a high rate of local control.     

Radiotherapeutic and surgical management for newly diagnosed brain metastasis(es): An American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guideline

PurposeTo systematically review the evidence for the radiotherapeutic and surgical management of patients newly diagnosed with intraparenchymal brain metastases.Methods and MaterialsKey clinical questions to be addressed in this evidence-based Guideline were identified. Fully published randomized controlled trials dealing with the management of newly diagnosed intraparenchymal brain metastases were searched systematically and reviewed. The U.S. Preventative Services Task Force levels of evidence were used to classify various options of management.ResultsThe choice of management in patients with newly diagnosed single or multiple brain metastases depends on estimated prognosis and the aims of treatment (survival, local treated lesion control, distant brain control, neurocognitive preservation).Single brain metastasis and good prognosis (expected survival 3 months or more): For a single brain metastasis larger than 3 to 4 cm and amenable to safe complete resection, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and surgery (level 1) should be considered. Another alternative is surgery and radiosurgery/radiation boost to the resection cavity (level 3). For single metastasis less than 3 to 4 cm, radiosurgery alone or WBRT and radiosurgery or WBRT and surgery (all based on level 1 evidence) should be considered. Another alternative is surgery and radiosurgery or radiation boost to the resection cavity (level 3). For single brain metastasis (less than 3 to 4 cm) that is not resectable or incompletely resected, WBRT and radiosurgery, or radiosurgery alone should be considered (level 1). For nonresectable single brain metastasis (larger than 3 to 4 cm), WBRT should be considered (level 3).Multiple brain metastases and good prognosis (expected survival 3 months or more): For selected patients with multiple brain metastases (all less than 3 to 4 cm), radiosurgery alone, WBRT and radiosurgery, or WBRT alone should be considered, based on level 1 evidence. Safe resection of a brain metastasis or metastases causing significant mass effect and postoperative WBRT may also be considered (level 3).Patients with poor prognosis (expected survival less than 3 months): Patients with either single or multiple brain metastases with poor prognosis should be considered for palliative care with or without WBRT (level 3).It should be recognized, however, that there are limitations in the ability of physicians to accurately predict patient survival. Prognostic systems such as recursive partitioning analysis, and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment may be helpful.ConclusionsRadiotherapeutic intervention (WBRT or radiosurgery) is associated with improved brain control. In selected patients with single brain metastasis, radiosurgery or surgery has been found to improve survival and locally treated metastasis control (compared with WBRT alone).     

Fractionated Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases in 43 Patients with Breast Carcinoma

About 15% of metastatic breast carcinoma patients are diagnosed with brain metastases. Historically, the majority are treated with palliative external whole-brain radiation with a median survival of 4 months. We examined stereotactic radiosurgery's effect on treatment outcome in such patients. Four hundred and fifty four consecutive patients with brain metastases were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery at Staten Island University Hospital, NY, between 1991 and 1999. The medical records of 60 women with histologically confirmed breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-three patients (71%) received fractionated radiosurgery (4×600cGy) and form the core of this report. Sixty five percentage had been previously unsuccessfully treated by whole-brain radiation or had recurrence after craniotomy. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. The median age at diagnosis of brain metastases was 52 years, with median interval of 49 months following the diagnosis of tumor primary. Median survival from brain diagnosis reached 13.6 months. Overall median survival from radiosurgery treatment was 7.5 months. Fifteen patients with one or two brain lesions survived a median of 11.5 months. For the fractionated cohort of patients 1- and 2-year actuarial survival was 28.2% and 12.8%, respectively. Three patients are alive at 32, 34 and 64 months, respectively. We conclude that fractionated radiosurgery improves survival of patients with brain metastases from breast cancer, especially those with small lesions, good functional status and no other metastatic disease. These patients should be encouraged to consider radiosurgery, possibly before WBRT. Considering our 7.5 months overall survival including patients with multiple metastases, and patients with progressive brain metastases despite extensive standard therapy and often systemic disease, these results suggest that radiosurgery could benefit breast cancer patients with brain metastases and extend life.     

Stereotactic radiosurgical boost following radiotherapy in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma: impact on local control

PURPOSE: Treatment of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma using external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone results in significant local recurrence. Although intracavitary brachytherapy can be used as a component of management, it may be inadequate if there is extension of disease to the skull base. To improve local control, stereotactic radiosurgery was used to boost the primary tumor site following fractionated radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-three consecutive patients were treated with radiosurgery following radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma from 10/92 to 5/98. All patients had biopsy confirmation of disease prior to radiation therapy; Stage III disease (1 patient), Stage IV disease (22 patients). Fifteen patients received cisplatinum-based chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy. Radiosurgery was delivered using a frame-based LINAC as a boost (range 7 to 15 Gy, median 12 Gy) following fractionated radiation therapy (range 64.8 to 70 Gy, median 66 Gy). RESULTS: All 23 patients (100%) receiving radiosurgery as a boost following fractionated radiation therapy are locally controlled at a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 2 to 64 months). There have been no complications of treatment caused by radiosurgery. However, eight patients (35%) have subsequently developed regional or distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic radiosurgical boost following fractionated EBRT provides excellent local control in advanced stage nasopharynx cancer and should be considered for all patients with this disease. The treatment is safe and effective and may be combined with cisplatinum-based chemotherapy.     

Excellent Outcomes with Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases in ALK and EGFR Driven Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

Patients with brain metastases (BMs) arising from EGFR-mutated and anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK)-rearranged NSCLC have a favorable prognosis compared with patients with non–oncogene-addicted NSCLC, emphasizing the importance of minimizing toxicities such as the cognitive sequelae of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Although radiosurgery without WBRT is the preferred strategy for one to three BMs, this paradigm remains controversial for patients with multiple BMs.

Radiotherapy and radiosurgical management of brain metastases

Out of the various cancer treatment modalities available, radiotherapy is the most commonly used for managing metastatic disease in the brain. Until recent years, this was almost exclusively limited to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Radiosurgery has emerged as a powerful technique for controlling small to moderate-sized brain metastases (<4 cm in diameter). Tumor control rates with radiosurgery are superior to those with WBRT and appear to equal or surpass those with surgery plus WBRT in most studies. The choice among various radiation management strategies (radiosurgery alone, radiosurgery plus WBRT, or surgery followed by radiotherapy) should be based on the size and location of the brain metastases, the functional and neurologic status of the patient, the type of tumor, the tumor imaging characteristics, and the patient’s concerns about the risks and side effects of the proposed treatment.     

Brain metastases

Opinion statement Brain metastases are an increasingly common complication in patients with systemic cancer. The optimal treatment for each patient depends on careful evaluation of several factors: the location, size, and number of brain metastases; the patient's age, general condition, and neurologic status; and the extent of systemic cancer to name a few. For patients with a single brain metastasis and limited systemic disease, the standard treatment is surgical resection followed by whole brain radiation therapy. In patients with a small, single metastasis, stereotactic radiosurgery is probably comparable to surgery. Patients with several metastases (up to three) and controlled systemic disease can be treated with whole-brain radiation and stereotactic radiosurgery. Patients with multiple metastases (more than three) are generally treated with whole-brain radiation alone. Radiosurgery is effective in treating patients with a limited number of recurrent brain metastases and stable systemic diseases. Surgery may have a role in patients with a large symptomatic recurrent lesion producing mass effect. Reirradiation and chemotherapy may have a limited role in patients with multiple recurrent metastases.     

The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based review of the role of radiosurgery for brain metastases

PURPOSE: To systematically review the evidence for the use of stereotactic radiosurgery in adult patients with brain metastases. METHODS: Key clinical questions to be addressed in this evidence-based review were identified. Outcomes considered were overall survival, quality of life or symptom control, brain tumor control or response and toxicity. MEDLINE (1990-2004 June Week 2), CANCERLIT (1990-2003), CINAHL (1990-2004 June Week 2), EMBASE (1990-2004 Week 25), and the Cochrane library (2004 issue 2) databases were searched using OVID. In addition, the Physician Data Query clinical trials database, the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (1997-2004), ASTRO (1997-2004), and the European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) (1997-2003) were searched. Data from the literature search were reviewed and tabulated. This process included an assessment of the level of evidence. RESULTS: For patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases, managed with whole-brain radiotherapy alone vs. whole-brain radiotherapy and radiosurgery boost, there were three randomized controlled trials, zero prospective studies, and seven retrospective series (which satisfied inclusion criteria). For patients with up to three (<4 cm) newly diagnosed brain metastases (and in one study up to four brain metastases), radiosurgery boost with whole-brain radiotherapy significantly improves local brain control rates as compared with whole-brain radiotherapy alone (Level I-III evidence). In one large randomized trial, survival benefit with whole-brain radiotherapy was observed in patients with single brain metastasis. In this trial, an overall increased ability to taper down on steroid dose and an improvement in Karnofsky performance status was seen in patients who were treated with radiosurgery boost as compared with patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy alone. However, Level I evidence regarding overall quality of life outcomes using a validated instrument has not been reported. All randomized trials showed improved local control with the addition of radiosurgery to whole-brain radiotherapy. For patients with multiple brain metastases, there is no overall survival benefit with the use of radiosurgery boost to whole-brain radiotherapy (Level I-III evidence). Radiosurgery boost is associated with a small risk of early or late toxicity. In patients treated with radiosurgery alone (withholding whole-brain radiotherapy) as initial treatment, there were 2 randomized trials, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 16 retrospective series. There is Level I to Level III evidence that the use of radiosurgery alone does not alter survival as compared to the use of whole-brain radiotherapy. However, there is Level I to Level III evidence that omission of whole-brain radiotherapy results in poorer intracranial disease control, both local and distant (defined as remaining brain, outside the radiosurgery field). Quality of life outcomes have not been adequately reported. Radiosurgery is associated with a small risk of early or late toxicity. Radiosurgery as salvage for patients with brain metastases was reported in zero randomized trials, one prospective study, and seven retrospective series. CONCLUSIONS: Based on Level I-III evidence, for selected patients with small (up to 4 cm) brain metastases (up to three in number and four in one randomized trial), the addition of radiosurgery boost to whole-brain radiotherapy improves brain control as compared with whole-brain radiotherapy alone. In patients with a single brain metastasis, radiosurgery boost with whole-brain radiotherapy improves survival. There is a small risk of toxicity associated with radiosurgery boost as compared with whole-brain radiotherapy alone. In selected patients treated with radiosurgery alone for newly diagnosed brain metastases, overall survival is not altered. However, local and distant brain control is significantly poorer with omission of upfront whole-brain radiotherapy (Level I-III evidence). Whether neurocognition or quality of life outcomes are different between initial radiosurgery alone vs. whole-brain radiotherapy (with or without radiosurgery boost) is unknown, because this has not been adequately tested. There was no statistically significant difference in overall toxicity between those treated with radiosurgery alone vs. whole-brain radiotherapy and radiosurgery boost based on an interim report from one randomized study. There is insufficient evidence as to the clinical benefit/risks radiosurgery used in the setting of recurrent or progressive brain metastases, although radiographic responses are well-documented.     

Radiation therapy for brain metastases from breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies that metastasize to the brain. Radiation therapy plays a central role in the management of brain metastases. METHODS: The medical records of 36 patients with brain metastases from breast cancer who underwent whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) at Kyoto University Hospital between 1993 and 2001 were reviewed. The treatment outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The median age at the time of diagnosis of brain metastases was 52 years. Only 4 patients (11%) had a single metastasis, while the others had multiple metastases. Uncontrolled extracranial metastases were present in 26 patients at the time of diagnosis of brain metastases. All patients received WBRT at a median dose of 31 Gy. Eight patients received conventional external-beam boost irradiation, and 2 received boost stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The overall median survival time was 7.9 months. Uncontrolled extracranial metastases except for bone metastases and old age were significantly associated with a poor survival rate. Twenty-six patients (82%) showed initial response, but 15 developed CNS failure, including 9 patients whose tumor recurred at the original site, 4 patients who developed tumors elsewhere in the brain and 3 patients who exhibited meningeal spread. The median duration of intracranial failure was 5.0 months. Whole-brain dose, and total tumor dose did not affect intracranial control. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy yielded a high initial response, but the duration of effect was limited with external beam irradiation alone. New treatment strategies such as adding SRS need to be studied further.     

The role of radiosurgery in the management of malignant brain tumors

Opinion statement Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides the means for creating lesions in deep-seated areas of the brain inaccessible to invasive surgery, using single high doses of focused ionizing radiation, administered using stereotactic guidance. It is a surgical technique designed to produce a specific radiobiological effect within a sharply defined target region in a single treatment session. Its technical application requires a stereotactic coordinate system, highly accurate patient repositioning (usually fixed), and multiple convergent beams of photon radiation. SRS appears to provide no benefit in the upfront treatment of newly diagnosed malignant gliomas but may be used to effectively palliate small well-demarcated volumes of recurrent disease. For selected patients with brain metastases treated with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), the addition of SRS improves median survival. In selected patients with brain metastases, it is also rational to withhold WBRT in favor of radiosurgery alone, with WBRT reserved for salvage without a decrease in median survival time.     

Guidelines for the initial management of metastatic brain tumors: role of surgery, radiosurgery, and radiation therapy

Brain metastases are an increasingly important determinant of survival and quality of life in patients with cancer. Current approaches to the management of brain metastases are driven by prognostic factors, including the Karnofsky Performance Status, tumor histology, number of metastases, patient age, and status of systemic disease. Most brain metastases are treated with radiosurgery, computer-assisted surgery, or whole brain radiation therapy. Remarkable advances in computer-assisted neuronavigation have made neurosurgical removal of metastases safer, even in eloquent areas of the brain. Computerization also enhances the efficacy and safety of conformal radiosurgery planning using various modern stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) technologies, including newer frameless-based systems. Controversial issues include whether to defer whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients undergoing SRS or image-guided surgery and when to use SRS "boost" in a patient undergoing WBRT. The determination of how best to apply these treatments for individual patients cannot be standardized to a single paradigm, but data from well-controlled studies help physicians make informed decisions about the benefits and risks of each approach.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with multiple brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Multiple brain metastases are a common health problem, frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer. The prognosis, even after treatment with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), is poor with average expected survivals less than 6 months. Retrospective series of stereotactic radiosurgery have shown local control and survival benefits in case series of patients with solitary brain metastases. We hypothesized that radiosurgery plus WBRT would provide improved local brain tumor control over WBRT alone in patients with two to four brain metastases. METHODS: Patients with two to four brain metastases (all < or =25 mm diameter and known primary tumor type) were randomized to initial brain tumor management with WBRT alone (30 Gy in 12 fractions) or WBRT plus radiosurgery. Extent of extracranial cancer, tumor diameters on MRI scan, and functional status were recorded before and after initial care. RESULTS: The study was stopped at an interim evaluation at 60% accrual. Twenty-seven patients were randomized (14 to WBRT alone and 13 to WBRT plus radiosurgery). The groups were well matched to age, sex, tumor type, number of tumors, and extent of extracranial disease. The rate of local failure at 1 year was 100% after WBRT alone but only 8% in patients who had boost radiosurgery. The median time to local failure was 6 months after WBRT alone (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-8.5) in comparison to 36 months (95% CI, 15.6-57) after WBRT plus radiosurgery (p = 0.0005). The median time to any brain failure was improved in the radiosurgery group (p = 0.002). Tumor control did not depend on histology (p = 0.85), number of initial brain metastases (p = 0.25), or extent of extracranial disease (p = 0.26). Patients who received WBRT alone lived a median of 7.5 months, while those who received WBRT plus radiosurgery lived 11 months (p = 0.22). Survival did not depend on histology or number of tumors, but was related to extent of extracranial disease (p = 0.02). There was no neurologic or systemic morbidity related to stereotactic radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: Combined WBRT and radiosurgery for patients with two to four brain metastases significantly improves control of brain disease. WBRT alone does not provide lasting and effective care for most patients.     

Surgical management of single and multiple brain metastases: results of a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Advancement in diagnosis and treatment of various cancer entities led to an increasing incidence of brain metastases in the last decades. Surgical excision of single and multiple brain metastases is one of the central treatment options beside radiotherapy, radiosurgery and chemotherapy. To evaluate the benefit of surgery with/without whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in single brain metastases and the influence of image guidance for brain metastases resection, 104 patients were retrospectively evaluated for post-operative outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1994 and December 1999 150 patients were surgically treated for brain metastases at the Department of Neurosurgery at the Technical University of Dresden. Outcome could be evaluated in 104 patients with respect to special treatment strategies and survival time (69 patients with single and 35 patients with multiple lesions). RESULTS: Most metastases originated from primary lung and breast tumours. Karnofsky performance score improved on average by 10 after surgery. The extent of the extracerebral tumour burden was the main influence on survival time. Patients' age below 70 years was combined with prolonged survival time (median survival time, MST: 4.5 months vs. 7 months). Patients with solitary cerebral metastasis had a MST of 16 months, whereas patients with singular lesions had a MST of 7 and 4 months, depending on the extent of the extracerebral tumour growth. Additional post-operative WBRT with 30 Gy was combined with an increase in MST in patients with single brain metastasis (surgery + WBRT: MST 13 months; surgery only: MST 8 months). In addition, the rate of recurrent cerebral tumour growth was distinctly higher in the non-WBRT group. Neuronavigation did not significantly improve post-operative survival time. In 80% of patients extracerebral tumour growth limited patients' survival. CONCLUSION: Surgery is an initial treatment option in patients with single and multiple brain metastases especially with large tumours (> 3 cm). Post-operative WBRT seems to prolong survival time in patients with single brain metastasis by decreasing local and distant tumour recurrence. Neuronavigational devices permit a targeted approach. Multiple processes can be extirpated in one session without prolonging the hospitalisation time for the patient. However, neuronavigational devices cannot assure complete tumour resection.     

The role of whole brain radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery on brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE: We reviewed our experience with patients who have undergone stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases secondary to renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Analysis was performed to determine the survival, local control, distant brain failure (DBF), and then to define which tumors may not require upfront whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-nine patients with 66 tumors underwent SRS from 1991 to 1998. Median follow-up from time of brain metastases diagnoses relative to each tumor was 12.5 months and 6.8 months from the time of SRS. Median SRS dose was 1,800 cGy to the 60% isodose line. Three patients had undergone SRS for previously treated tumors. RESULTS: Median survival time from diagnosis was 10.0 months. Overall survival was not affected by age, addition of WBRT, number of lesions, tumor volume, or the presence of systemic disease. Of the 23 patients with follow-up neuroimaging, 4 of 47 (9%) tumors recurred. The addition of WBRT did not improve local control. Of the 13 patients who presented with a single lesion, 3 went on to develop DBF (23%), while 6 of the 10 patients who presented with multiple metastases developed DBF (60%). CONCLUSION: Patients with brain metastases secondary to RCC treated by SRS alone have excellent local control. The decision of whether or not to add WBRT to SRS should depend on whether the patient has a high likelihood of developing DBF. Our study suggests that patients who present with multiple brain lesions may be more likely to benefit from the addition of WBRT because they appear to be more than twice as likely to develop DBF as compared to patients with a single lesion.     

Management of brain metastases: the indispensable role of surgery

Brain metastases are the most common neurological complication of systemic cancer and carry a very poor prognosis. The management of patients with brain metastases has become more important recently because of the increased incidence of these tumors and the prolonged patient survival times that have accompanied increased control of systemic cancer. In this article, we review the current perspectives on surgical treatment of brain metastases in terms of patient selection criteria, intraoperative adjuncts, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as a postoperative adjuvant, reoperation for tumor recurrence, and resection of multiple and single metastases. Achieving the best outcome in treatment of brain metastasis requires the judicious and complementary use of surgical resection along with modalities such as whole-brain radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery.     

Whole Brain Radiotherapy Combined with Stereotactic Radiosurgery versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery Alone for Brain Metastases

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) combined with streotactic radiosurgery versus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone for patients with brain metastases. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study that evaluated the results of 46 patients treated for brain metastases at Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Radiation Oncology Department, between January 2012 and January 2015. Twenty-four patients were treated with WBRT+SRS while 22 patients were treated with only SRS. Results: Time to local recurrence was 9.7 months in the WBRT+SRS arm and 8.3 months in SRS arm, the difference not being statistically significant (p= 0.7). Local recurrence rate was higher in the SRS alone arm but again without significance (p=0,06). Conclusions: In selected patient group with limited number (one to four) of brain metastases SRS alone can be considered as a treatment option and WBRT may be omitted in the initial treatment.     

Stereotactic radiosurgical treatment in 103 patients for 153 cerebral melanoma metastases

PURPOSE: To report on the outcome of patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred three patients with 153 intracranial melanoma metastases consecutively underwent Linac-based SRS between November 1991 and October 2001. The Kaplan-Meier method, univariate comparisons with log-rank test, and multivariate analyses with classification and regression tree models were performed. Calculations were based on last imaging date rather than the date of the last visit. RESULTS: Median age was 51 years (range, 18-93 years). Median Karnofsky performance status was 90. Sixty-one patients (59%) had single brain metastasis at presentation. Treatment sequence was SRS alone (61 patients), SRS + whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (12 patients), and salvage SRS after WBRT (30 patients). The median tumor volume was 1.9 cm(3) (range, 0.06-22.3 cm(3)). The median SRS minimum peripheral dose and isodose was 18 Gy (range, 10-24 Gy) and 85% (range, 60%-100%), respectively. The median follow-up was 6 months for all patients and 13 months (range, 2-46 months) for patients alive at the time of analysis. The 1-year local control (LC) for all patients treated with SRS was 49%. Among the patients treated with initial SRS alone, the 1-year LC was better for patients with tumors < or =2 cm(3) than with tumors >2 cm(3): 75.2% vs. 42.3% (p < 0.05). The 1-year distant brain metastasis-free survival incidence was 14.7% for the 73 patients receiving either initial SRS alone or SRS +WBRT. The initial number of brain lesions (single vs. multiple) was the only factor with a significant effect on distant brain metastasis-free survival at 1 year: 23.5% for single metastases and 0% for multiple lesions (p < 0.05). The 1-year overall survival was 25.2%. Stratification by Score Index for Radiosurgery (SIR) revealed a significant effect on survival, which was 29% at 1 year for SIR >6 and 10% for SIR <==6 (relative hazard ratio, 2.1; p < 0.05) in classification and regression-tree multivariate analysis involving age, Karnofsky performance status, primary tumor control, tumor volume, SRS dose, SIR (>6 vs. < or =6), and systemic disease status. CONCLUSIONS: Initial SRS alone was an effective treatment modality for smaller cerebral melanoma metastases, achieving a 75% incidence of 1-year LC for < or =2 cm(3) single brain metastases and should be considered in patients with SIR >6. The role of WBRT in melanoma brain metastases cannot be addressed, owing to retrospective bias toward administering this treatment to patients with more aggressive disease. A prospective study is needed to assess the role of WBRT in patients with melanoma brain metastasis.     

Adjuvant treatment of brain metastases

With an incidence of 15/10(5) in the general population, brain metastases constitute a serious, debilitating complication in cancer patients. The majority of those patients suffer from more than one metastasis, but up to 30% to 40% present with a solitary lesion. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) extends median survival from 1 to 2 months for treatment with steroids only, to 4 to 6 months in most series. However, long-term survival (>1-2 years) is observed in up to 10% of patients with favorable prognostic factors, such as solitary lesions, good Karnofsky performance status, and absence of extracranial disease. For those patients, individually optimized treatment is worthwhile. For good-prognosis patients with controlled extracranial disease, surgery in combination with postoperative WBRT should be considered, especially when fast relief of symptoms is mandated. For surgically inaccessible solitary lesions below a size threshold of approximately 30 ccm, stereotactic radiosurgery (RS), although never compared to surgery in a randomized fashion, seems to yield comparable results and is the treatment of choice for more than one lesion in appropriately selected patients. Nevertheless, a number of questions concerning the optimal treatment regimens for brain metastases remain. These mainly concern the radiation dose, need for a combination of RS and WBRT, relative timing of different treatment modalities, and maximum number of brain metastases that can reasonably be treated with RS when long-term progression-free survival is the goal. However, RS is definitely an excellent option for salvage and palliation in patients with short life expectancy, as it is simultaneously noninvasive and cost-effective, with short hospitalization times.     

脑转移瘤的立体定向放射治疗

单纯立体定向放射外科能取得全脑放疗联合立体定向外科治疗相同的生存率,对于局部控制来说,结果有冲突。全脑放疗较局部治疗（立体定向放射外科和手术）减少颅内新发病灶。单纯立体定向放射外科组颅内治疗病灶外以及颅内总体复发率均增加,而且联合全脑放疗不增加认知功能损伤。对于1-3个脑转移瘤患者,单纯立体定向放射外科生存好于单纯全脑放疗。全脑放疗联合立体定向外科治疗较全脑放疗能改善局部控制,并在不增加并发症的基础上改善KPS评分。对于单发脑转移灶,联合治疗有生存获益。但2个及2个以上的脑转移灶是否有生存优势,尚有争论。对于多发脑转移瘤、KPS〈70分的患者联合治疗能改善生存。全脑放疗联合立体定向外科治疗和手术联合全脑放射治疗两组无生存差异。