A randomized trial of prolonged high dose of interferon plus ribavirin for hepatitis C patients nonresponders to interferon alone

Retreatment of chronic hepatitis C patients nonresponders to interferon (IFN) alone with the standard dose of IFN [3 million units (MU) thrice weekly (TIW)] plus ribavirin for 24 weeks has yielded low sustained virological response (SVR), averaging 8%. The aim of the present, open-labelled, randomized study was to evaluate the efficacy of IFN induction therapy followed by prolonged high dose of IFN plus ribavirin in nonresponders. One hundred and fifty-one patients were randomized to receive 5 MU daily of IFN alfa-2b (group 1, n = 73) or 5 MU TIW of IFN alfa 2b (group 2, n = 78) for 4 weeks followed by IFN (5 MU TIW) plus ribavirin (1000/1200 mg/daily) for 48 weeks in both groups. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the sustained virological response (SVR) at 24-week follow-up was 33 and 23% for group 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.17). The overall SVR was 52 and 18% in patients with genotype 2/3 and 1/4, respectively. Among genotype 1/4 patients the SVR was 29 and 11% for age younger or older than 40 years. Compared with genotype 2/3 patients, the risk (95% confidence interval) of nonresponse to retreatment was 3.0-fold (1.17-8.0) in younger genotype 1/4 patients and 8.4-fold (3.0-23.29) in older genotype 1/4 patients. In conclusion these results suggest that retreatment with a reinforced regimen should be focused in nonresponder genotype 2/3 patients and younger genotype 1/4 patients, who are most likely to benefit. Induction therapy does not improve SVR.     

Efficacy of prolonged interferon therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C with HCV-genotype 1b and high virus load

Background: In patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-genotype 1b and a high virus load, of more than 1 Meq/ml by the DNA probe assay, the clearance of HCV-RNA was achieved in only 10% with a 6-month interferon (IFN) course. We therefore assessed the efficacy of prolonged IFN therapy in patients with HCV-genotype 1b and a high virus load. Methods: A total of 51 patients with HCV genotype 1b who were given 6 million units (MU) of natural IFN-α daily for 8 weeks followed by three-times-weekly treatment with natural IFN-α for 16 weeks, were enrolled in this trial. These 51 patients were randomly assigned to one of two schedule groups at the time of termination of the first IFN therapy. The 48-week-group patients (n = 25) were given 6 MU of natural IFN-α by intramuscular injection three times weekly for 24 weeks, beginning within a week after the termination of the first IFN therapy. The 72-week-group patients (n = 26) were given 6 MU of IFN-α by intramuscular injection three times a week for 48 weeks, beginning within a week after the termination of the first IFN therapy. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated 24 and 30 months after the initiation of the first IFN treatment. A virological response (VR) to IFN therapy was defined as the normalization of serum alanime amino transferase (ALT) level (ALT ≲ 50 IU) and HCV-RNA negativity at the two time points. Biochemical response (BR) was defined as the normalization of serum ALT, but positivity for HCV-RNA, assessed by commercial Amplicor HCV qualitative assays, at the two time points. Results: The efficacy of IFN treatment was assessed in relation to the IFN administration schedule by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and per-protocol analysis. With respect to the IFN regimen, VR occurred in 16.6% (4/24) of the patients in the 48-week-group with additional IFN and in 20% (5/25) in the 72-week-group with additional IFN by ITT analysis. The BR rate was 33.3% (8/24) in the 48-week group and 48% (12/25) in the 72-week group. Conclusions: We found that prolonged IFN therapy could be a worthwhile treatment strategy for patients with HCV genotype 1b and a high serum virus load. Received: March 15, 2002 / Accepted: July 26, 2002 Reprint requests to: Y. Arase Editorial on page 204     

Response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C due to genotype 4

SUMMARY: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1 and 4 respond less well to pegylated interferon (pegIFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) therapy. For this reason most studies merge these two genotypes when assessing virological response. However, in most trials the HCV genotype 4 population is rather small, and conclusions are mainly derived from what occurs in HCV-1 patients. All HCV-4 patients coinfected with HIV who received pegIFN plus RBV in two different multicentre studies, PRESCO and ROMANCE, conducted respectively in Spain and Italy, were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline plasma HCV-RNA, proportion of patients with HCV-RNA <10 IU / mL at week 4 (rapid virological response), and HCV-RNA declines >2 logs at week 12 (early virological response, EVR) were all assessed as predictors of sustained virological response (SVR). Overall, 75 patients (60 men) were evaluated. Median age was 40 years and median CD4 count 598 cells / mm(3); 49% had plasma HIV-RNA <50 copies / mL; 71% had elevated liver enzymes and 31% had advanced liver fibrosis (Metavir F3-F4). Median serum HCV-RNA was 5.7 log IU / mL. Rapid virological response was attained by 10 (20%) patients and EVR by 26 (42%). Using intention-to-treat and on-treatment (OT) analyses, SVR was achieved by 21 / 75 (28%) and 21 / 62 (34%) of HCV-4 patients, respectively. In the multivariate analysis (OT), baseline HCV-RNA (OR 0.09 for every log increment; 95% CI: 0.01-0.7) and EVR (OR: 7.08; 95% CI: 1.8-27.2) were significantly and independently associated with SVR. This is the largest series of HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C due to HCV-4 treated with pegIFN plus RBV examined so far and the results show that HCV-4 behaves similarly to HCV-1. Therefore, these patients should be considered as difficult to treat population. Baseline serum HCV-RNA and EVR are the best predictors of SVR in HCV-4 / HIV-coinfected patients.     

Consensus interferon and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C and failure of previous interferon-alpha therapy.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of consensus interferon (CIFN), a synthetic IFN with optimised in vitro activity, was assessed in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients who had failed the pretreatment with interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) and ribavirin. METHODS: One hundred and three patients after non-response (n=69) or relapse (n=34) to IFNalpha+/-ribavirin were randomly assigned to high-dose induction (CIFN 27-->9 microg daily for 24 weeks, 9 microg t.i.w. for 24 weeks) or low-dose treatment (CIFN 18 microg t.i.w. for 12 weeks, 9 microg t.i.w. for 36 weeks); each with ribavirin 800 mg/day. Follow-up was 24 weeks. RESULTS: Non-responder patients treated with high-dose induction had higher early virological response rates (63% vs. 39%, P<0.05). This initial positive effect was lost during the last 24 weeks of treatment yielding sustained virological response (SVR) rates of 26% in both groups. Relapse patients revealed SVR in 70% and 38% in groups A and B (NS). Treatment was well tolerated with side effect-related preterm discontinuations in 8% and 5%. CONCLUSIONS: CIFN and ribavirin treatment induced considerable SVR rates in patients with non-response or relapse to IFNalpha+/-ribavirin. Viral elimination rates might be further increased by continuous daily administration of CIFN and weight-adjusted ribavirin dosing.     

Effect of lactoferrin in patients with chronic hepatitis C: combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin

OBJECTIVES: Lactoferrin has been reported to inhibit hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in cultured human hepatocytes and HCV viremia in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of combined triple therapy of lactoferrin, interferon and ribavirin in patients with CHC. METHODS: A total of 111 Japanese patients with CHC were randomly assigned to a lactoferrin group (n = 50) and a control group (n = 61). The lactoferrin group was treated with lactoferrin for 8 weeks and then with lactoferrin, interferon and ribavirin for 24 weeks; the control group was treated with interferon and ribavirin for 24 weeks. Serum anti-lactoferrin antibody, clinical and laboratory measurement were determined. RESULTS: The mean HCV RNA titer significantly decreased at the end of lactoferrin monotherapy. Sustained virological response to therapy was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the lactoferrin responder group (55%) than in the control group (18%). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the decrease in HCV RNA titer by lactoferrin monotherapy contributes to the effectiveness of the combined therapy of interferon and ribavirin in patients with CHC. Lactoferrin is a potential useful adjunct treatment for patients with CHC.     

Adequate timing of ribavirin reduction in patients with hemolysis during combination therapy of interferon and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C

Background Hemolytic anemia is one of the major adverse events of the combination therapy of interferon and ribavirin. Because of ribavirin-related hemolytic anemia, dose reduction is a common event in this therapy. In this clinical retrospective cohort study we have examined the suitable timing of ribavirin reduction in patients with hemolysis during combination therapy.Methods Thirty-seven of 160 patients who had HCV-genotype 1b, had high virus load, and received 24-week combination therapy developed anemia with hemoglobin level <10g/dl or anemia-related signs during therapy. After that, these 37 patients were reduced one tablet of ribavirin (200mg) per day. After reduction of ribavirin, 27 of 37 patients could continue combination therapy for a total of 24 weeks (group A). However, 10 of 37 patients with reduction of ribavirin could not continue combination therapy because their <8.5g/dl hemoglobin values decreased to or anemia-related severe side effects occurred (group B). We assessed the final efficacy and safety after reduction of ribavirin in groups A and B.Results A sustained virological response (SVR) was 29.6% (8/27) in group A and 10% (1/10) in group B, respectively. A 34.4% (12/27) of SVR + biological response in group A was higher than 10% (1/10) in group B (P = 0.051), with slight significance. With respect to hemoglobin level at the time of ribavirin reduction, a rate of continuation of therapy in patients with 10g/dl hemoglobin was higher than that in patients with <10g/dl (P = 0.036).Conclusions Reduction of ribavirin at hemoglobin level 10g/dl is suitable in terms of efficacy and side effects.     

Twenty-four weeks of interferon alpha-2b in combination with ribavirin for Japanese hepatitis C patients: sufficient treatment period for patients with genotype 2 but not for patients with genotype 1.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA titer and HCV genotype are two major determinants of the outcome of interferon (IFN) monotherapy. To clarify the usefulness of combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin in Japanese hepatitis C patients, we treated patients with a relatively high dose of IFN in combination with ribavirin for 24 weeks and examined the effects in relation to the viral parameters. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-five patients were enrolled in the study. The patients received either 6 or 10 million units (MU) of interferon alpha-2b every day for 2 weeks and then three times a week for 22 weeks with a daily dose of either 600 or 800 mg of ribavirin. The treatment response and safety of this treatment were examined. RESULTS: The sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 26.8% in genotype 1 and 76.5% in genotype 2 (P < 0.001), and 36.1% with the 6 MU group and 45.8% with the 10 MU group (P = 0.09). Multivariate analysis indicated that SVR was associated with genotype 2, HCV RNA <500 kilointernational unit/ml (kIU/ml), and HCV RNA undetectability at week 8 of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our current study showed that a 24-week course of IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy was effective with respect to virologic response in Japanese hepatitis C patients, particularly in patients with HCV genotype 2.     

Comparison of low-dose pegylated interferon versus standard high-dose pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C with genotype 3: an Indian experience

Background and Aims: In chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with genotype 3, therapy with pegylated interferon (peg‐IFN) alfa‐2b in a dose of 1.5 μg/kg/week and ribavirin (800–1000 mg/day) is recommended for 24 weeks. Reduced doses of peg‐IFN may increase compliance and decrease cost and adverse events. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of two different regimens of peg‐IFN alfa‐2b, in combination with ribavirin, in genotype 3 patients. Methods: A total of 103 liver biopsy–proven chronic HCV patients with genotype 3, having alanine aminotransferase levels >1.2 × ULN and positive HCV‐RNA were randomized into two groups: group I (n = 76; age, 43.1 ± 11.4 years; male/female, 67/9) received peg‐IFN 1.0 μg/kg/week + ribavirin 10.6 mg/kg/day, while group II (n = 27; age, 37.3 ± 11.6 years; male/female, 21/6) received peg‐IFN 1.5 μg/kg/week + ribavirin 10.6 mg/kg/day. Patients in both groups were treated for 24 weeks. End of treatment viral response (ETVR) and sustained viral response (SVR) after a 6‐month follow‐up period were assessed. Results: In both groups I and II, one patient was lost to follow‐up, while one patient in group II withdrew due to side‐effects. ETVR was seen in 72/76 (94.7%) of patients in the low dose group and 24/27 (88.9%) of patients in the high dose group (P = 0.375). SVR was seen in 60/76 (78.9%) of patients in the low dose group and 25/27 (92.6%) of patients in the high dose group (P = 0.145). Age (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.263; P = 0.008) and fibrosis (correlation coefficient, 0.263; P = 0.008) showed a significant correlation with the SVR. Conclusion: In patients with genotype 3, peg‐IFN at 1.0 μg/kg/week with ribavirin is as effective as peg‐IFN at 1.5 μg/kg/week with ribavirin.     

Chronic hepatitis C genotype 6 responds better to pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy than genotype 1

Background and Aims: Chronic hepatitis C genotype 6 is common in Hong Kong, especially among i.v. drug abusers. Responses of these patients to combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment were inconsistent and the numbers of patients involved in previous studies were small. We performed a retrospective study to compare the therapeutic responses of this regimen in patients infected with genotype 6 and genotype 1. Methods: Seventy patients with either genotype 6 or genotype 1 were recruited. Both groups received 800–1200 mg of ribavirin daily plus either 180 mg of pegylated α‐interferon‐2a or 1.5 mg/kg pegylated α‐interferon‐2b weekly for 48 weeks. Their responses to treatments were compared. Results: The early virological response to combination therapy of patients with genotype 6 was significantly better than that of genotype 1 (88.6% vs 74.3%, P = 0.03). Significant difference was also identified in the end of treatment response of the two genotypes (60% vs 81.4% for genotype 1 and 6, respectively; P = 0.005). The sustained virological response (SVR) to treatment in patients with genotype 6 was also significantly superior to that of patients with genotype 1 (75.7% vs 57.1%, P = 0.02). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age of 55 years or less, genotypes of hepatitis C virus, liver biopsy staging and baseline hepatitis C virus RNA of 200 000 IU/mL or less were independent predictors for better SVR in this cohort. Conclusion: Patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 6 respond better to pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination treatment than patients with genotype 1.     

A multicenter survey of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan

Aim: This study aimed to clarify the factors associated the efficacy of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C who had failed to respond to previous treatment. Methods: One hundred and forty‐three patients who had previously shown relapse (n = 79), non‐response (n = 34) or intolerance (n = 30) to PEG IFN plus ribavirin were re‐treated with PEG IFN plus ribavirin. Results: Twenty‐five patients with intolerance to previous treatment completed re‐treatment and the sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 55% and 80% for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 2, respectively. On re‐treatment of the 113 patients who completed the previous treatment, the SVR rates were 48% and 63% for genotype 1 and 2, respectively. Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level on re‐treatment were associated with SVR in genotype 1 (P < 0.001). Patients with the interleukin‐28B major genotype responded significantly better and earlier to re‐treatment, but the difference in the SVR rate did not reach a significant level between the major and minor genotypes (P = 0.09). Extended treatment of 72 weeks raised the SVR rate among the patients who attained complete early virological response but not rapid virological response with re‐treatment (72 weeks, 73%, 16/22, vs 48 weeks, 38%, 5/13, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level have predictive values for a favorable response of PEG IFN plus ribavirin re‐treatment for HCV genotype 1 patients. Re‐treatment for 72 weeks may lead to clinical improvement for genotype 1 patients with complete early virological response and without rapid virological response on re‐treatment.     

Optimal dose of peginterferon and ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C

Summary.  Chronic hepatitis C affects 170 million people worldwide, including up to 4 million people in the United States. The current standard of care therapy with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) while highly successful in patients with genotype 2 and 3 infection, allows for sustained virologic response in 42–46% of treatment-naïve genotype 1 patients, comprising about 70% of cases of chronic hepatitis C in the USA. While awaiting approval of Specifically Targeted Antiviral Therapy for HCV (STAT-C) agents, which will require the completion of additional clinical trials, it is important to optimize the dose and duration of currently available treatment modalities, namely PEG-IFN and RBV, for treatment of CHC. Results of several recent trials evaluating optimal dosing of RBV and higher than standard dosing of PEG-IFN in treatment-naïve genotype 1 patients, as well as data from retreatment trials with "induction" doses of PEG-IFN or high-dose RBV in prior non-responders to IFN-based therapy will be reviewed here. The possibility of shorter duration of therapy for genotype 2 and 3 patients based on recent publications and presentations will be discussed as well.     

High-dose interferon alpha-2b induction therapy in combination with ribavirin for Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b with a high baseline viral load

Background Although pegylated interferon (IFN) is now used in many countries as a standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C, the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of high-dose interferon alpha-2b induction with ribavirin are not fully evaluated, especially in Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b with a high viral load.Methods Patients (n = 83) received daily, high-dose induction therapy of interferon alpha-2b (6 million units [MU] once daily for 2 weeks), followed by 6MU three times weekly for 22 weeks. Oral ribavirin (800 or 600mg/day) was given daily for 24 weeks, and then the patients were followed up for 24 weeks.Results Of the 83 patients, 67 (81%) had a biochemical response (BR), and 37 (45%) achieved a sustained BR (SBR). Virologic response (VR; undetectable serum HCV RNA level by polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) was noted in 55 (66%) patients, and sustained VR (SVR) in 16 (19%) patients. Baseline viral load did not influence treatment outcome. There was no significant difference in treatment outcome among treatment-naÏve patients, relapsers, and nonresponders to previous IFN monotherapy. Multivariate analyses identified serum ribavirin concentrations at week 8 of therapy (odds ratio [OR], 23.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84–61.1; P = 0.015) and negativity for serum HCV RNA at week 8 (OR, 22.5; CI, 1.76–57.5; P = 0.017, respectively) as two significant and independent predictors of SVR.Conclusions The efficacy of 24-week combination therapy of high-dose IFN alpha-2b induction and ribavirin deserves attention in HCV genotype 1b patients with a high viral load, especially in nonresponders to previous IFN monotherapy and patients with a very high viral load.     

Triple therapy of initial high-dose interferon with ribavirin and amantadine for patients with chronic hepatitis C

Aims: We previously reported the potential effect of combination therapy of an initial high‐dose interferon (IFN) and amantadine on the eradication of HCV‐RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The additive effects of amantadine on interferon and ribavirin combination therapy remain controversial. In this study we investigated the efficacy of initial high‐dose IFN with ribavirin and amantadine on the virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C with a high viral load of genotype 1b. Methods: Twenty‐two patients with high viral loads of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients were administered IFN‐beta for four weeks and then IFN‐alpha2b for 22 weeks with daily oral administration of ribavirin and amantadine. Results: A sustained virological response (SVR) was shown in 31.8% (seven of 22 patients). With the naïve patients, the SVR rate was 21.4% (three of 14 patients). In patients who could not eradicate HCV‐RNA by previous IFN monotherapy, the SVR rate was 50% (four of eight patients). Conclusion: Triple therapy with an initial high dose of IFN with ribavirin and amantadine may be effective, especially for chronic hepatitis C IFN‐retreatment patients with a high viral load of genotype 1b.     

Peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Saudi patients commonly infected with genotype 4.

AIM: Comparing the efficacy of peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin with interferon alpha -2b plus ribavirin in Saudi patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) commonly infected with genotype 4. METHODS: A total of 96 patients with chronic HCV infection were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Forty-eight patients received once weekly 100 microg of peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin given orally 800 mg/day (peginterferon group). Another 48 patients received thrice weekly 3 million units of interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin 800 mg/day (interferon group). At the end of treatment (48 weeks) and sustained (72 weeks) biochemical and virologic responses were determined. RESULTS: In the peginterferon group, 70.8% (34/48) patients attained both biochemical and virologic responses at the end of the treatment as against 52.1% (25/48) patients in the interferon group. (P=0.09 for both). Similarly, sustained biochemical and virologic responses in the peginterferon group were attained in 52.1% (25/48) and 43.8% (21/48) patients as against 43.8% (21/48) and 29.2% (14/48) patients in the interferon group, respectively (P=0.54 and 0.20, respectively). The sustained virologic response rates in patients with genotype 4 were 42.9% (12/28) in the peginterferon group and 32.3% (10/31) in the interferon group (P=0.43). Patients in peginterferon group had higher, although statistically not significant adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Saudi patients with chronic HCV attained a higher, although statistically not significant sustained virologic response with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin compared with interferon plus ribavirin.     

Pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C in patients with congenital bleeding disorders: a single-centre experience

Summary. Chronic hepatitis C is a major comorbidity in patients with haemophilia. Although the current state‐of‐the‐art therapy consists of pegylated interferon (PegIFN) and ribavirin, there are no reports of the efficacy of this combination in the haemophilia population. The aim of this study was to assess the response and side‐effects of PegIFN and ribavirin in patients with inherited bleeding disorders. Patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated with PegIFN alpha‐2b (1.5 μg kg⁻¹ week⁻¹) and ribavirin (800–1200 mg day⁻¹) for 24 (genotype 2 and 3) or 48 weeks (genotype 1) and followed for an additional 24 weeks. In total, 56 patients were enrolled: 31 (55%) had genotype 1, 12 (21%) genotype 2, and 13 (23%) genotype 3. Ten patients (18%) were HIV co‐infected and seven (13%) had been previously treated with IFN‐α with or without ribavirin. The overall response was 55%. In HIV‐negative and treatment‐naïve patients, the sustained virological response was 70%. Successful treatment was associated with genotypes 2 and 3, absence of HIV, absence of previous IFN treatment, and decrease of hepatitis C virus load at weeks 4 and 12. Although many side‐effects occurred, only a minority (11%) discontinued therapy for this reason. Dose reduction of PegIFN was required in 28% and of ribavirin in 35% of patients. Overall, 22% of patients developed a depression requiring antidepressant drugs and one patient developed psychosis. In conclusion, PegIFN and ribavirin is effective in patients with inherited bleeding disorders. Treatment is safe, but severe side‐effects may occur and warrant close monitoring during therapy.     

Partial splenic embolization prior to combination therapy of interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients with thrombocytopenia

Aim: A low platelet count leads to dose reduction of interferon (IFN) and is associated with failure to achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C patients. However, partial splenic embolization (PSE) is effective for treating thrombocytopenia resulting from hypersplenism. Methods: We compared the clinical features of 10 patients receiving PSE prior to the combination therapy of IFN and ribavirin (RBV) (PSE group) with those of 10 non‐receiving PSE patients (non‐PSE group). Results: In all 10 patients, PSE was successfully performed without serious adverse events. After PSE, leukocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts significantly increased. The period from PSE to the initiation of the combination therapy was 15 (7–21) days. In the PSE group, two of six patients (33%) infected with genotype 1, and all four patients infected with genotype 2, achieved SVR. In the non‐PSE group, only three patients infected with genotype 2 achieved SVR. Two patients in the PSE group and one in the non‐PSE group discontinued the combination therapy. Three patients of the PSE group and five of the non‐PSE group reduced the dose of pegylated IFN‐α‐2b because of thrombocytopenia. In the PSE group, platelet counts during the combination therapy fell to baseline levels; however, they did not fall to lower levels than baseline levels. In the non‐PSE group, platelet counts 1 month after the initiation of the therapy were lower than baseline levels. Conclusion: The increase of platelet counts after PSE may allow the safe use of IFN and RBV and improve the SVR rate in chronic hepatitis C patients with thrombocytopenia.     

Treatment of hepatitis C with interferon and ribavirin

Hepatitis C is a worldwide problem that frequently results in end-stage liver disease and its complications. Treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been rather ineffective but several recent studies have clarified the role of interferon and ribavirin therapy. In line with therapeutic progress in HIV infection, hepatitis C is now entering the era of multidrug antiviral therapy. Ribavirin is an orally active synthetic guanosine analogue with theoretical antiviral and immunomodulatory actions. In this review we have evaluated the role of interferon and ribavirin in treatment-naive patients, relapsers and non-responders. In naive patients the combination results in improved end-of-treatment and sustained response rates, with an overall 41% sustained virological response rate in patients treated for 48 weeks. Therapeutic benefit also extends to the traditionally difficult to treat patients (genotype 1, high vital load and advanced fibrosis). The addition of ribavirin to interferon has also resulted in an increased toxicity profile, which has made therapy more difficult for both the patient and managing physician. However, the significant improvement in response rates for all patients makes combination therapy the most appropriate choice as the first-line therapy for suitable patients with chronic viral hepatitis C. Appropriate management with interferon and ribavirin includes assessing the patient's HCV genotype to determine the optimal duration of therapy, assessing therapeutic efficacy by measuring HCV-RNA at 24 weeks and monitoring for the additional ribavirin side-effects.     

A randomized trial of induction doses of interferon alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine for treatment of nonresponder patients with chronic hepatitis C

Background Efficacy and safety of interferon induction therapy alone or in combination with ribavirin or ribavirin plus amantadine were evaluated in chronic hepatitis C patients who were nonresponders to primary antiviral treatment. Methods The study was designed to have 225 HCV nonresponder patients, but at an interim analysis the response rate difference between groups was lower than expected and the enrollment was stopped when 75 patients had been randomized to receive interferon-α2a (group A, n = 26), interferon-α2a plus 15 mg/kg per day of ribavirin (group B, n = 24), or interferon-α2a plus ribavirin plus 200 mg/day of amantadine hydrochloride (group C, n = 25). Treatment duration was 48 weeks. The dose of interferon was 6 MU/day for 4 weeks followed by 3 MU/day for the remaining 44 weeks. Results On intention-to-treat, the sustained virological response at 24 weeks of follow-up was 11.5% in group A, 12.5% in group B, and 12% in group C. Therapy was discontinued because of adverse effects in three patients in group A (11.5%), three in group B (12.5%), and two in group C (8%). Conclusions Nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C may achieve a sustained virological response rate of approximately 12% if retreated with interferon induction treatment followed by administration of a daily dose. The addition of ribavirin or amantadine did not seem to improve the response rates.     

Hepatic iron accumulation is associated with disease progression and resistance to interferon/ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver iron accumulation in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) has received increasing attention in recent years. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and severity of liver iron deposition in CHC, to assess its relationship with clinical, biochemical and histological characteristics, and to study its influence on the response to interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy. METHODS: We studied liver biopsy specimens from 103 hepatitis C virus (HCV) and 34 hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected patients and total iron score (TIS) was measured. Seventy patients infected with HCV genotype 1b were treated with IFN/ribavirin for 24 weeks. RESULTS: CHC patients had a significantly higher TIS than chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients (7.03 +/- 5.34 vs 4.41 +/- 4.49, P = 0.0056). TIS was significantly correlated with alcohol intake (P = 0.0213, r = 0.290), transaminase level (P = 0.0126, r = 0.247), platelet count (P = 0.0002, r = -0.369), histological grading (P = 0.0121, r = 0.248) and staging (P = 0.0003, r = 0.356) in CHC patients. Pretreatment TIS was significantly higher in non-sustained virological responders (SVR) than in SVR to IFN/ribavirin treatment (TIS = 7.69 +/- 5.76 vs 4.39 +/- 3.27, P = 0.0310). Multiple regression analysis showed that TIS was the only independent variable associated with resistance to IFN/ribavirin (P = 0.0277). CONCLUSIONS: Liver iron deposition was common in CHC compared to CHB and was associated with liver disease progression. Increased hepatic iron stores in CHC were related to resistance to IFN/ribavirin treatment.     

Orally administered Kampo medicine,Juzen-taiho-to,ameliorates anemia during interferon plus ribavirin therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Background Interferon plus ribavirin (IFN/Rib) therapy is currently standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Hemolytic anemia, however, is a serious side effect of this treatment, requiring reductions in or complete withdrawal of ribavirin.Methods We retrospectively investigated the effect of the Kampo medicine Juzen-taiho-to (TJ-48), which contains bone marrow-stimulating compounds, on anemia in 67 patients with chronic hepatitis C, who received IFN/Rib therapy.Results The reduction in hemoglobin levels was significantly ameliorated in TJ-48-treated patients (P < 0.05). Consequently, only 13% (4/32) of TJ-48-treated patients received altered doses of ribavirin, while the ribavirin dose had to be reduced or withdrawn in 43% (15/35) of patients in the absence of TJ-48 administration (P < 0.001).Conclusions These results indicate the possibility that oral administration of TJ-48 supports IFN/Rib therapy without necessitating ribavirin reduction or withdrawal.