循环热灌注化疗联合替吉奥及热疗治疗老年胃癌癌性腹水的疗效观察

目的观察循环热灌注化疗联合口服替吉奥化疗及内生场热疗治疗老年胃癌合并腹腔积液的临床疗效及其不良反应。方法选择42例合并恶性腹腔积液老年胃癌患者,随机分为腹腔灌注联合替吉奥及热疗组(观察组)和替吉奥联合热疗组(对照组),两组均给予替吉奥口服化疗以及每3 d一次的内生场热疗,观察组另予以每3周一次的顺铂循环热灌注化疗。治疗2个疗程后评价疗效与不良反应。结果观察组及对照组总原发肿瘤的有效率为57. 1%及42. 9%,腹水控制率分别为81. 0%及47. 6%,腹水肿瘤细胞转阴率分别为81. 0%及38. 1%。两组患者治疗过程中不良反应发生率无明显差异,且均无严重不良反应,未发生治疗相关性死亡。结论循环热灌注化疗联合口服替吉奥全身化疗及内生场热疗治疗合并腹腔积液晚期胃癌疗效好,安全性高,可作为合并腹腔积液晚期胃癌可选的治疗方法。     

甘露聚糖肽联合顺铂治疗恶性胸腔积液的临床疗效

目的 观察甘露聚糖肽联合顺铂治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效.方法 选择93例住院肺癌合并恶性胸腔积液患者,分别给予胸腔内注射甘露聚糖肽联合顺铂,与单用甘露聚糖肽、顺铂,每周1次,连续注射2～3周.结果 甘露聚糖肽联合顺铂组治疗有效率87.5％,单用甘露聚糖肽组有效率58.1％,单用顺铂组有效率56.7％ (P ＜0.05).结论 甘露聚糖肽联用顺铂治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效优于单用甘露聚糖肽及单用顺铂组.     

热疗联合替吉奥治疗老年晚期胃癌的临床疗效

目的:评价替吉奥胶囊(S-1)联合热疗治疗老年晚期胃癌的临床疗效及不良反应,旨在为65岁以上的老年晚期胃癌患者寻找有效、不良反应轻的治疗方式.方法:选择2010-02/2012-09的石河子大学医学院第一附属医院的老年胃癌晚期患者(年龄≥65岁)90例,采用随机对照研究将90例患者随机分为3组.A组给予替吉奥胶囊单药化疗,B组给予替吉奥联合热疗,C组给予卡培他滨联合热疗,治疗时间超过两周期,观察近期、远期疗效以及不良反应,进行统计学分析.结果:A、B、C组临床获益率分别是50%、80%,70%,B组较A组临床获益率高(P0.05),与C组差异无统计学意义(P0.05).远期疗效评价:B组、C组中位无进展生存时间(6.6、5.8 m o)较A组(3.8 m o)有所延长(P0.05).替吉奥较卡培他滨化疗不良反应轻,主要是乏力、腹泻、手足综合症反应较轻,差异有统计学意义(P0.05).结论:替吉奥联合热疗或卡培他滨联合化疗治疗老年晚期胃癌比替吉奥单药疗效好,替吉奥联合热疗与卡培他滨联合热疗疗效无差异,但替吉奥较卡培他滨不良反应轻,老年患者耐受性好.     

甘露聚糖肽联合卡铂胸腔内灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液疗效观察

目的观察甘露聚糖肽联合卡铂胸腔内灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液的疗效,安全性和耐受性。方法 29例恶性胸腔积液患者随机分为两组,A组16例和B组13例。A组于胸腔内灌注卡铂,400 mg,每周1次。B组同时灌注卡铂和甘露聚糖肽,卡铂的剂量同A组,甘露聚糖肽的剂量为60 mg,每周1次。结果 A组CR 2例（12.5%）,PR 4例（25%）,有效率为37.5%。B组CR 5例（38.5%）,PR 6例（46.2%）,有效率（RR）为84.7%。B组有效率高于A组,差异有统计学意义。全组患者生活质量改善20例,KPS评分改善率达69%。所有患者耐受性好,无治疗相关死亡,主要的毒性反应为胃肠道反应和骨髓抑制。结论甘露聚糖肽联合卡铂胸腔内灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液疗效肯定,临床安全性好,不良反应发生低,能改善生活质量,值得临床推广。     

运用固本攻毒法治疗晚期胃癌90例

目的:评价运用固本攻毒法联合替吉奥+顺铂方案化疗治疗晚期胃癌的近期疗效及安全性.方法:随机纳入符合试验标准的胃癌患者90例.对照组给予替吉奥+顺铂方案:替吉奥25mg/m~2,bid,po,d1-21;顺铂75 mg/m~2静脉滴注,d1;28 d/周期.治疗组行替吉奥+顺铂方案化疗联合固本攻毒法治疗;两组均在第二周期完成后评价两组患者近期疗效评价及不良反应发生率改善情况.结果:(1)近期疗效方面:对照组患者部分缓解6例(13.33%),稳定10例(22.22%),进展29例(64.44%),总体疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)35.56%;治疗组患者部分缓解9例(20.00%),稳定17例(22.22%),进展19例(42.22%),DCR为57.78%;两组近期临床疗效差异有统计学意义(P0.05);(2)安全性方面:与对照组比较,治疗组血常规异常、恶心和呕吐的发生率明显降低(P0.05).结论:运用固本攻毒法联合替吉奥+顺铂方案治疗晚期胃癌,近期疗效增加,化疗不良反应发生率降低,从而达到增效减毒之目的.     

替吉奥胶囊联合奥沙利铂加与不加紫杉醇治疗晚期胃癌的疗效对比

目的对比替吉奥胶囊联合奥沙利铂加与不加紫杉醇治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效。方法选取2012年5月—2013年5月我院收治的晚期胃癌患者88例,将其随机分为对照组和观察组,各44例。对照组给予替吉奥胶囊+奥沙利铂化疗方案,观察组给予替吉奥胶囊+奥沙利铂+紫杉醇化疗方案,比较两组患者的临床疗效和毒副作用。结果两组总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);观察组临床受益率为88.6%(39/44),高于对照组的70.5%(31/44)(P0.05);观察组周围神经毒性发生率、脱发发生率低于对照组(P0.01)。结论替吉奥胶囊联合奥沙利铂加紫杉醇较不加紫杉醇治疗晚期胃癌疗效好,且毒副作用发生率低,安全性较高。     

替吉奥与多西他赛联合顺铂治疗老年晚期胃癌的疗效比较

目的比较替吉奥与多西他赛联合顺铂治疗老年晚期胃癌的疗效和不良反应。方法将138例老年胃癌患者按性别、年龄、病理类型、癌细胞转移等指标进行筛选编号,分成两个组,每组69例,其中,体力状况较好的患者采用替吉奥与多西他赛联合顺铂治疗(称为联合治疗组),另一组采用替吉奥联合顺铂治疗(称为常规治疗组)。比较两组患者的疗效和不良反应。结果常规治疗组和联合治疗组的有效治疗率分别为44.93%和47.83%,有效控制率分别为78.26%和79.71%,两组间比较差异无统计学意义(χ~2=0.047,P=0.623;χ~2=0.038,P=0.617)。联合治疗组患者的白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、腹泻、恶心呕吐、口腔黏膜炎、色素沉着和周围神经毒性等不良反应的发生率明显高于常规治疗组(均P<0.05)。结论替吉奥与多西他赛联合顺铂治疗老年晚期胃癌有效率较高,不良反应发生率较高但可控制。     

恩度静滴联合顺铂腹腔灌注治疗恶性腹腔积液28例效果观察

目的观察恩度静滴联合顺铂腹腔灌注治疗恶性腹腔积液的效果及安全性。方法将同期收治的晚期消化道肿瘤并恶性腹腔积液患者随机分为观察组28例和对照组26例,两组均予顺铂腹腔灌注,在此基础上观察组予恩度静滴。2个疗程后观察两组疗效、中位生存期、卡氏评分、免疫功能指标变化及不良反应发生情况。结果观察组有效率、中位生存期、卡氏评分改善率及免疫功能指标均显著优于对照组（P〈0．05、0．01）,且不良反应率未显著增加。结论恩度静滴联合顺铂腹腔灌注治疗恶性腹腔积液可提高抗癌疗效、改善患者生活质量、延长生存期、增强免疫功能,且安全性高。     

热灌注顺铂治疗晚期卵巢癌恶性腹腔积液的临床疗效

目的 探讨热疗联合顺铂对人卵巢癌细胞的毒性增效作用及治疗卵巢癌恶性腹腔积液的疗效.方法 MTT法研究常温及42℃不同作用时间下温热联合顺铂对卵巢癌细胞敏感株SKOV3的生长抑制作用,流式细胞术检测细胞凋亡.观察腹腔热灌注顺铂治疗36例晚期卵巢癌腹腔积液的疗效及不良反应.结果 42℃热疗显著增强顺铂对卵巢癌细胞敏感株SKOV3的生长抑制,42℃热疗60min联合顺铂化疗显著增加SKOV3细胞凋亡率.热灌注顺铂治疗卵巢癌腹腔积液的有效率为61.1％(22/36),不良反应轻微.结论 热疗能显著增强顺铂的卵巢癌细胞毒性作用,热灌注顺铂是晚期老年卵巢癌患者安全有效的治疗方法.     

闭式引流合用甘露聚糖肽与顺铂治疗癌性胸腔积液

目的观察胸腔穿刺置深静脉导管引流合用甘露聚糖肽联用顺铂与单用顺铂治疗癌性胸腔积液的疗效和毒副反应。方法癌性胸腔积液住院患者60例,分为治疗、对照两组,各30例。用一次性中心静脉导管行胸腔穿刺置管引流胸液,分别经引流管胸腔内注入甘露聚糖肽、顺铂与单用顺铂治疗。结果治疗组有效率83.3%,明显优于对照组的53.3%,P〈0.05。结论胸腔穿刺置深静脉引流合用灌注甘露聚糖肽联用顺铂治疗癌性胸腔积液的疗效优于单用顺铂治疗。     

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated by noncurative resection: a multivariate analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The relationship between prognostic factors and survival time after noncurative gastric resection in patients with advanced gastric cancer was examined by a retrospective review of data on 364 patients. METHODOLOGY: There were 168 patients without metastasis to the liver or peritoneum (group A), 127 with peritoneal metastasis and no liver metastasis (group B), 50 with liver metastasis and no peritoneal metastasis (group C) and 19 with synchronous liver and peritoneal metastases (group D). Patients were primarily treated with the following 3 drugs: the fluorinated pyrimidines, cisplatin, and mitomycin C. RESULTS: Patients in group D had a very poor prognosis as compared with the other groups. Multivariate analysis using the Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for sex, age, and other covariants indicated that lymph node metastasis, lymph node dissection, and fluorinated pyrimidines for group A, cisplatin for group B, and lymph node dissection for group C were independent prognostic factors. An analysis of patients excluding cases who died within 30 days after surgery revealed that lymph node dissection for group A, lymph node dissection and cisplatin for group B, and lymph node dissection for group C were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment protocol specific for the residual disease may improve the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated by noncurative resection.     

重组人血管内皮抑制素联合顺铂腹腔热灌注化疗对肝胆胰恶性肿瘤腹腔积液的疗效观察

目的探讨对肝胆胰恶性肿瘤腹腔积液患者采用重组人血管内皮抑制素联合顺铂腹腔热灌注化疗(hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, HIPEC)的效果和安全性。方法将70例肝胆胰恶性肿瘤腹腔积液患者分成对照组和观察组,对照组给予顺铂行HIPEC,观察组加用重组人血管内皮抑制素行HIPEC;观察两组的肿瘤、细胞免疫和肝功能指标的变化,以及疗效和化疗毒副反应。结果 3周后两组的AFP、CEA、CA125和CD8;水平低于治疗前,CD4;和CD4;/CD8;水平升高,观察组的改善幅度高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组的ALT和TBA水平低于治疗前,ALB和Fg水平升高(P<0.05);组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组的ORR和DCR高于对照组(P<0.05);毒副反应率组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对肝胆胰恶性肿瘤腹腔积液患者采用重组人血管内皮抑制素联合顺铂行HIPEC,能控制肿瘤发展,提高细胞免疫功能,改善肝功能和疾病预后,安全性较高。     

Combined S-1 and cisplatin preoperative chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer: report of five cases

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A high response rate with acceptable toxicities is required in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Five cases (3 stage IV, 2 stage IIIb) of advanced gastric cancer were successfully treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of a combination of S-1 and cisplatin. METHODOLOGY: All 5 patients were men younger than age 60, with no severe complications. S-1 was administered orally (80 mg/m2/day) twice daily for 21 consecutive days, and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) was infused over 2 hours on day 8 with hydration. This schedule was repeated every 5 weeks. After each cycle, the clinical response evaluation was performed with endoscopy, barium meal, and spiral CT scan. Surgery was carried out about 3 weeks after chemotherapy. RESULTS: All patients were responders (100%) after one or two cycles. However, there was no patient with either complete response, or down-staging. Toxicities, according to the WHO criteria, were very mild and none required treatment. Postoperatively one patient died of aspiration pneumonia unrelated to the chemotherapy. The others were discharged within 3 weeks after operation without complications. CONCLUSIONS: S-1 plus cisplatin seems safe and effective as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients.     

胸腔灌注洛铂与顺铂治疗肺癌性胸腔积液的疗效和护理

目的观察胸腔灌注洛铂(LBP)与顺铂(DDP)治疗肺癌性胸腔积液的疗效、毒副反应及护理。方法 60例确诊为肺癌性胸腔积液的患者,经胸腔置管引流术排尽积液后,随机分为LBP组和DDP组,每组30例。胸腔内灌注治疗,比较各组的疗效、患者的生活质量和毒副反应。结果 LBP组有效率为86.7%,DDP组有效率为63.3%(P0.05)。LBP组消化道不良反应发生率为20.0%,DDP组消化道不良反应发生率为46.7%(P0.05)。LBP组的Kamofsky评分较DDP组有显著提高(P0.05)。结论 LBP胸腔灌注治疗肺癌性胸腔积液疗效肯定,良好的护理是治疗成功的关键。     

射频热疗联合胸腔内注射药物治疗老年人恶性胸腔积液的临床研究

目的观察胸腔深部射频热疗联合胸腔内注射榄香烯加顺铂治疗老年人恶性胸腔积液的疗效和不良反应。方法确诊为肿瘤所致的恶性胸腔积液的老年患者75例,≥60岁,随机分为两组。采用中心静脉置管进行胸腔引流术尽可能排爆胸水,A组38例,平均年龄（70．3±2.4）岁,患者给予胸腔内注射榄香烯300mg联合顺铂30mg,每周1次。然后进行患侧胸腔深部射频热疗;B组37例,平均年龄（69．5±2．6）岁患者只给予胸腔内注射榄香烯300mg联合顺铂30mg,每周1次。结果两组总有效率,即完全缓解率＋部分缓解率为：A组86．84％,B组62．16％,两组差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,A组与B组生活质量好转率分别为81.58％和62．16％（P〈0.05）。结论胸腔深部射频热疗联合榄香烯加顺铂治疗老年恶性胸水有较好效果,毒副作用小,是安全有效的方法。     

Addition of docetaxel to S-1 without platinum prolongs survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomized study (START)

Purpose

Cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil has been globally accepted as a standard regimen for the treatment for advanced gastric cancer. However, cisplatin has several disadvantages, including renal toxicity and the need for admission. S-1 plus cisplatin has become a standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer in East Asia. This phase III study was designed to evaluate the potential benefits of adding docetaxel to S-1 without a platinum compound in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel plus S-1 or S-1 alone. The docetaxel plus S-1 group received docetaxel on day 1 and oral S-1 on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle. The S-1 alone group received oral S-1 on days 1–28 of a 42-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival.

Results

Of the 639 patients enrolled, 635 were eligible for analysis. The median overall survival was 12.5 months in the docetaxel plus S-1 group and 10.8 months in the S-1 alone group (p = 0.032). The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months in the docetaxel plus S-1 group and 4.2 months in the S-1 alone group (p = 0.001). As for adverse events, neutropenia was more frequent in the docetaxel plus S-1 group, but remained manageable.

Conclusion

As first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, docetaxel plus S-1 significantly improves median overall and progression-free survival as compared with S-1 alone. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00287768).     

Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction associated with S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy for highly advanced gastric cancer with paraaortic lymph node metastases: report of a case

A 56-year-old man who was diagnosed with gastric cancer with multiple paraaortic lymph node metastases was treated with S-1 plus cisplatin. The spleen gradually enlarged during the therapeutic courses. After the 6th course of therapy, the primary gastric lesion and paraaortic lymphadenopathies disappeared. He underwent a curative resection, including a distal gastrectomy with regional and paraaortic lymph node dissections. Irregularly distributed congestion of the liver was noted during the surgery. Histological examinations revealed residual cancer cells in 3 regional lymph nodes and no cancer cells in the primary site and paraaortic lymph nodes. Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) was also confirmed histologically. This is the first report of a case with SOS after S-1 plus cisplatin therapy. S-1 plus cisplatin therapy can cause SOS, although it is a promising preoperative chemotherapy for highly advanced gastric cancer.