Current opinion regarding indications for emergency department thoracotomy

BACKGROUND: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is a dramatic but rarely lifesaving intervention. Clinical variability regarding indications for EDT has yet to be quantified. Members of the Eastern and American Associations for the Surgery of Trauma were questioned by mail to evaluate which clinical and demographic factors influence the decision to perform EDT and whether physicians perform EDT in accordance with current practice guidelines. METHODS: A single mailing of an anonymous survey was sent to 1,124 surgeons to collect institutional and physician demographics as well as indications for EDT on the basis of variable mechanisms of trauma, duration of arrest, and signs of life (SOL). Statistical analysis included the Pearson and linear-by-linear association chi(2) tests, independent samples t test, and univariate and multivariate analyses of variance; p values of < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Completed surveys were received from 358 respondents. After 54 surveys were excluded that were incomplete, late, or from noneligible respondents, 304 surveys were analyzed. There were no significant differences in EDT indications among institutions of differing caseload volume, exposure to penetrating trauma, trauma level designation, American College of Surgeons verification status, or residency program affiliation. In addition, neither the respondent's position nor whether attendings versus residents performed the majority of EDTs influenced clinical decision-making. Performance criteria for EDT were liberal in comparison with established guidelines, especially for blunt trauma. The presence or recent loss of SOL influenced responses, but respondents varied greatly in their definition of SOL. CONCLUSION: A lack of agreement exists regarding the indications for EDT in multiple clinical scenarios as well as in defining SOL. Indications for EDT were liberal, especially for blunt trauma-related indications, and were determined by clinical parameters, not by physician or institutional factors. Our results suggest that clinical practice is at variance with Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines. We recommend that practice guidelines for EDT be established on the basis of a consensus definition of SOL to allow for a more uniform and selective approach to EDT.     

Benchmarking emergency department thoracotomy: Using trauma video review to generate procedural norms

IntroductionEmergency department thoracotomy (EDT) must be rapid and well-executed. Currently there are no defined benchmarks for EDT procedural milestones. We hypothesized that trauma video review (TVR) can be used to define the ‘normative EDT’ and generate procedural benchmarks. As a secondary aim, we hypothesized that data collected by TVR would have less missingness and bias than data collected by review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR).MethodsWe used continuously recording video to review all EDTs performed at our centre during the study period. Using skin incision as start time, we defined four procedural milestones for EDT: 1. Decompression of the right chest (tube thoracostomy, finger thoracostomy, or clamshell thoracotomy with transverse sternotomy performed in conjunction with left anterolateral thoracotomy) 2. Retractor deployment 3. Pericardiotomy 4. Aortic Cross-clamp. EDTs with any milestone time ≥ 75^th percentile of time or during which a milestone was omitted were identified as outliers. We compared rates of missingness in data collected by TVR and EMR using McNemar’s test.Results44 EDTs were included from the study period. Patients had a median age of 30 [IQR 25–44] and were predominantly African-American (95%) males (93%) with penetrating trauma (95%). From skin incision, median times in minutes to milestones were as follows: right chest decompression: 2.11 [IQR 0.68–2.83], retractor deployment 1.35 [IQR 0.96–1.85], pericardiotomy 2.35 [IQR 1.85–3.75], aortic cross-clamp 3.71 [IQR 2.83–5.77]. In total, 28/44 (64%) of EDTs were either high outliers for one or more benchmarks or had milestones that were omitted. For all milestones, rates of missingness for TVR data were lower than EMR data (p < 0.001).ConclusionsVideo review can be used to define normative times for the procedural milestones of EDT. Steps exceeding the 75^th percentile of time were common, with over half of EDTs having at least one milestone as an outlier. Data quality is higher using TVR compared to EMR collection. Future work should seek to determine if minimizing procedural technical outliers improves patient outcomes.     

Neurologic outcome after emergency room thoracotomy for trauma

The charts of 168 patients undergoing resuscitative thoracotomy for trauma in the emergency room at the San Francisco General Hospital from 1972 through 1978 were reviewed to assess factors affecting neurologic recovery after cardiac arrest. Forty-nine patients survived resuscitation and definitive operation, but 8 of them died in the first 24 hours postoperatively. Four patients in this group made some neurologic recovery (two good recoveries, two severe disabilities) but died later (12 to 44 days postoperatively) of septic complications. Thirteen nonsurvivors made no neurologic recovery before death. There were 33 long-term survivors (19.6 percent), 10 of whom were agonal or had no vital signs when first admitted to the emergency room. A persistent vegetative state developed in two patients who later died of sepsis (10 days and 14 months postoperatively). The remaining 32 patients all made good neurologic recovery that was apparent within 12 hours postoperatively. Transient amnesia was present during recovery in three patients. Wakefulness was the best prognostic sign of full neurologic recovery. In conclusion, emergency room thoracotomy can save a substantial number of moribund trauma patients who can be expected to sustain full neurologic recovery if they awaken within 12 hours.     

The use of emergency department thoracotomy for traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest

Despite the establishment of evidence-based guidelines for the resuscitation of critically injured patients who have sustained cardiopulmonary arrest, rapid decisions regarding patient salvageability in these situations remain difficult even for experienced physicians. Regardless, survival is limited after traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest. One applicable, well-described resuscitative technique is the emergency department thoracotomy-a procedure that, when applied correctly, is effective in saving small but significant numbers of critically injured patients. By understanding the indications, technical details, and predictors of survival along with the inherent risks and costs of emergency department thoracotomy, the physician is better equipped to make rapid futile versus salvageable decisions for this most severely injured subset of patients.     

Efficacy of emergency room thoracotomy in pediatric trauma

With improved rapid transportation systems, an increasing number of children may arrive at the emergency room (ER) without detectable vital signs and may undergo vigorous resuscitation, including emergency room thoracotomy, aortic cross clamping, and open cardiac massage. Of 1,287 pediatric trauma admissions between 1980 and 1985, 101 deaths were recorded. Fifty (50%) of the deaths occurred in the ER. Thirty-three of the patients were pronounced dead with obvious irreversible injuries, while 17 (34%) with suspected thoracoabdominal injuries underwent ER thoracotomy during resuscitation. None of the 17 patients had detectable vital signs upon arrival to the ER. Fifteen patients had multisystem injuries associated with blunt trauma and two with isolated penetrating injuries. Despite maximal conventional resuscitation and ER thoracotomy, none of the 17 patients survived. In this group of pediatric blunt trauma victims who appear initially salvageable, and present in the ER with no detectable vital signs, ER resuscitative thoracotomy did not influence survival. ER thoracotomy in children, therefore, should be reserved for patients presenting with penetrating thoracic injuries or blunt injuries associated with detectable vital signs and deterioration despite maximal conventional therapy.     

Analysis of occupational exposures associated with emergency department thoracotomy

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have examined the cost effectiveness of emergency department thoracotomy (EDT), provider risk has not been included in these analyses. This study examined the costs associated with provider exposure to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis from percutaneous injury during EDT. METHODS: A decision tree describing the occupational risks and costs associated with EDT was created. Exposed providers undergo initial counseling, evaluation, and HIV postexposure prophylaxis and treatment as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control. Costs are reported from a health care system perspective in year-2000 dollars. The following prevalences were assumed: HIV (7.1%), hepatitis C (18%), and provider percutaneous injury rate (10%). Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the prevalence of disease and the probability of seroconversion. RESULTS: According to the authors' model assumptions, the probability is 0.00004 for HIV and 0.0027 for chronic hepatitis C seroconversion. The total additional cost per thoracotomy associated with an exposure is dollars 1,377. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department thoracotomy is associated with important provider medical risks. Future analyses of EDT should include these factors in reports on the value of this procedure.     

Outcomes after emergency department thoracotomy for penetrating cardiac injuries: a new perspective

Previous reports have described penetrating cardiac injuries as the anatomic injury with the greatest opportunity for emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) survival. We hypothesize that actual survival rates are lower than that initially reported. A retrospective review of our EDT experience was performed. Data collected included injury mechanism and location, presence of measurable ED vital signs, initial ED cardiac rhythm, GCS, method of transportation, and survival. Logistic regression analysis identified predictors of survival. Ninety-four of 237 patients presented penetrating cardiac injuries after EDT. Eighty-nine patients (95%) were males. Measurable ED vital signs were present in 15 patients (16%). Cardiac injuries were caused by GSW in 82 patients (87%) and SW in 12 patients (13%). Fifteen patients (16%) survived EDT and were taken to the operating room, while eight patients (8%) survived their entire hospitalization. All survivors were neurologically intact. Survival rates were 5% for GSW and 33% for SW. Mechanism of injury (SW), prehospital transportation by police, higher GCS, sinus tachycardia, and measurable ED vital signs were associated with improved survival. In urban trauma centers where firearm injuries are much more common than stabbings, the presence of a penetrating cardiac injury may no longer be considered a predictor of survival after EDT.     

Survival after emergency department versus operating room thoracotomy for penetrating cardiac injuries.

The authors undertook a 6-year retrospective review to assess their experience with penetrating cardiac injuries. Special emphasis was placed on identifying patients with and without tamponade and those requiring emergency department (ED) thoracotomy. Forty-eight patients were identified. Overall survival was 64.6 per cent. Thirty-three patients had tamponade, with 20 requiring ED thoracotomy. Fifteen patients did not have tamponade and two of these needed ED thoracotomy. Five patients who had ED thoracotomy were long-term survivors (22.7%). The remaining 26 patients, 13 with tamponade and 13 without, received operating room (OR) thoracotomy and all survived. The data shows that excellent results are possible with OR thoracotomy for penetrating cardiac injuries, with or without tamponade. However, results are not as good when ED thoracotomy is necessary. This may relate to the severity of the injury, the duration of tamponade, or the inability to control cardiac bleeding during thoracotomy in the ED setting. Even though survival is low with ED thoracotomy, it is high enough to continue to support its use in the deteriorating patient with a penetrating cardiac wound.     

Validation of new trauma triage rules for trauma attending response to the emergency department

INTRODUCTION: The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma has suggested triage criteria for the immediate attendance of a trauma surgeon to an injured patient in the emergency department. This study validates the accuracy of these criteria in identifying high-risk trauma patients and assesses the impact of trauma surgeon response time. METHODS: A study group of trauma patients with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mm Hg, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 8, airway compromise managed with endotracheal intubation (ETI) or surgical airway, or gunshot wound (GSW) to the neck or torso were compared with a control group of patients meeting none of these criteria. Outcome measurements included Injury Severity Score (ISS), duration of hospitalization (length of stay [LOS]), intensive care unit (ICU) days, direct transfer to the ICU or operating room, and mortality. For the study group, trauma surgeon response times, < or = 15 minutes and > 15 minutes, were compared for age, ISS, LOS, ICU days, mortality, and direct transfer to the ICU or operating room. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test and the Yates-corrected chi(2) test (p < 0.05), with odds ratios calculated on the basis of trauma activation criteria and outcome measures. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the relation between the independent variables SBP, GCS, ETI, and GSW with direct transfer to the ICU or operating room and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 4,910 patients were identified, including 791 study group patients. The mean ISS, LOS, ICU days, and mortality were significantly higher in the study group (p < 0.01). Odds ratios of the study group for direct transfer to the ICU or operating room were 91 and 2 for ETI, 23 and 1.4 for GCS score < 8, 8 and 2.2 for GSW, and 7 and 1.6 for SBP < 90 mm Hg, respectively. The odds ratios for mortality were 39 for ETI, 104 for GCS score < 8, 12 for GSW, and 74 for SBP < 90 mm Hg. Regression analysis demonstrated that GSW, SBP < 90 mm Hg, and ETI predicted ICU admission; GSW, SBP < 90 mm Hg, and ETI predicted operative intervention; and GCS score < 8, SBP < 90 mm Hg, and ETI were associated with mortality. Trauma surgeon response times were available for 658 (83%) of the study group patients. No significant differences were found between the two response groups. CONCLUSION: Trauma patients meeting the triage criteria proposed by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma have more severe injuries, a higher mortality rate, and longer hospital and ICU stays than control patients. SBP < 90 mm Hg, ETI, and GSW are predictive of urgent operating room use and ICU admission. A significantly higher mortality rate is associated with SBP < 90 mm Hg, ETI, and GCS score < 8. Incorporating these criteria into trauma center triage rules to identify high-risk injured patients is warranted. However, trauma surgeon response time < or = 15 minutes was not associated with improved patient outcome, and optimal response time remains uncertain.