Correction: Efficient removal of cobalt from aqueous solution using β-cyclodextrin modified graphene oxide

Correction for ‘Efficient removal of cobalt from aqueous solution using β-cyclodextrin modified graphene oxide’ by Wencheng Song et al., RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 9514–9521.

The authors regret that Fig. 1 and ​and33 were incorrect in the original article. The SEM images of both GO and β-CD, and the Raman spectra of both, were confused with other samples. The correct versions of Fig. 1 and ​and33 are presented below.Open in a separate windowFig. 1SEM images of (a) GO and (b) β-CD-GO.Open in a separate windowFig. 2Raman spectra of GO and β-CD-GO.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: Green-synthesised cerium oxide nanostructures (CeO2-NS) show excellent biocompatibility for phyto-cultures as compared to silver nanostructures (Ag-NS)

Correction for ‘Green-synthesised cerium oxide nanostructures (CeO₂-NS) show excellent biocompatibility for phyto-cultures as compared to silver nanostructures (Ag-NS)’ by Qaisar Maqbool, RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 56575–56585, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra12082f.

The author regrets that Fig. 4 and ​and55 of the original article did not appropriately represent the findings.Open in a separate windowFig. 4Comparative TGA analysis of CeO₂-NS and Ag-NS.Open in a separate windowFig. 5FTIR spectrum of CeO₂-NS and Ag-NS.The correct version of Fig. 4 is shown below. In addition, the associated text on page 56578 “Experimental findings show total mass loss…” should be changed to “Experimental findings show total mass loss of 57.53% by CeO₂-NS and 61.12% by Ag-NS.” Fig. 5 of the original article shows only the plot of selected data points. In order to provide clarity to readers, it should be replaced with the following original FTIR plots (complete scan).The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: An indenocarbazole-based host material for solution processable green phosphorescent organic light emitting diodes

Correction for ‘An indenocarbazole-based host material for solution processable green phosphorescent organic light emitting diodes’ by Eun Young Park et al., RSC Adv., 2021, 11, 29115–29123. DOI: 10.1039/D1RA04855D.

The authors regret that an incorrect version of Fig. 1 was included in the original article. The correct version of Fig. 1 is presented below.Open in a separate windowFig. 1HOMO, LUMO distributions and energy level of PCIC predicted through DFT and TD-DFT calculations.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: A novel biocompatible,simvastatin-loaded,bone-targeting lipid nanocarrier for treating osteoporosis more effectively

Correction for ‘A novel biocompatible, simvastatin-loaded, bone-targeting lipid nanocarrier for treating osteoporosis more effectively’ by Shan Tao et al., RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 20445–20459, DOI: 10.1039/D0RA00685H.

The authors regret that incorrect versions of Fig. 7, ​,99 and ​and1010 were included in the original article. The correct versions of Fig. 7, ​,99 and ​and1010 are presented below.Open in a separate windowFig. 7Histological analysis of organs from all experimental groups. H&E staining of heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, indicating the carrier has good biocompatibility. Scale bar = 50 μm.Open in a separate windowFig. 9Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity (arrows) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) assay results (arrowheads) of bone tissue sections. Scale bar = 50 μm. The ALP activity is much more high in SIM/LNPs and SIM/ASP₆-LNPs groups, while the TRAP activity is the opposite.Open in a separate windowFig. 10Histological assessment of bone formation in all experimental groups. (A) HE staining of femur bone. Scale bar = 50 μm. Histology of bone in the all experimental groups shows all ovariectomized groups had a higher amount of adipose tissue than Sham group. The trabecular bone is much more prominent in SIM/LNPs and SIM/ASP₆-LNPs groups. (B) Immunohistochemical staining for BMP-2 in typical newly-formed bone tissue (red arrows) and immunohistochemical staining for the osteogenic markers osteopontin (OPN, arrows) and osteocalcin (OCN, arrowheads). Scale bar = 50 μm. The BMP-2, OPN, OCN are much more prominent in SIM/LNPs and SIM/ASP₆-LNPs groups.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: Synthesis and characterization of AFe2O4 (A: Ni,Co, Mg)–silica nanocomposites and their application for the removal of dibenzothiophene (DBT) by an adsorption process: kinetics,isotherms and experimental design

Correction for ‘Synthesis and characterization of AFe₂O₄ (A: Ni, Co, Mg)–silica nanocomposites and their application for the removal of dibenzothiophene (DBT) by an adsorption process: kinetics, isotherms and experimental design’ by Fahimeh Vafaee et al., RSC Adv., 2021, 11, 22661–22676, https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA02780H.

The authors regret an error in Fig. 4 where a section of the XRD for 4(a) and (b) is identical.Open in a separate windowFig. 4(a) The XRD pattern of sample 3 after adsorption of DBT. (b) The XRD pattern of sample 3 before adsorption of DBT.The authors have repeated the experiment and provided new data for Fig. 4. An independent expert has viewed the new data and has concluded that it is consistent with the discussions and conclusions presented. The correct Fig. 4 is shown below:The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: Chrysomycins A–C,antileukemic naphthocoumarins from Streptomyces sporoverrucosus

Correction for ‘Chrysomycins A–C, antileukemic naphthocoumarins from Streptomyces sporoverrucosus’ by Shreyans K. Jain et al., RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 21046–21053, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra42884b.

The authors regret that incorrect versions of Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 were included in the original article. The correct versions of Fig. 6 and ​and77 are presented below.Open in a separate windowFig. 6Influence of compounds 1–3 on the nuclear morphology of human leukaemia HL-60 cells. The cells were treated with 1, 3 and 5 μM concentrations of these compounds for 24 h and stained with Hoechst 33258 for 40 min. The altered nuclear morphology and apoptotic bodies indicated by white arrows are seen in treated cells while the nuclei of the untreated cells were round and intact.Open in a separate windowFig. 7Phase contrast microscopy of compound-treated leukaemia HL-60 cells. Cells were treated with compounds 1–3 at 1, 3 and 5 μM for 24 h and visualized using a phase contrast microscope (Olympus1X72). The morphology of treated cells altered in a concentration-dependent manner, while the untreated cells remained healthy.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: A p-type multi-wall carbon nanotube/Te nanorod composite with enhanced thermoelectric performance

Correction for ‘A p-type multi-wall carbon nanotube/Te nanorod composite with enhanced thermoelectric performance’ by Dabin Park et al., RSC Adv., 2018, 8, 8739–8746.

The authors regret that an incorrect version of Fig. 8 was included in the original article. The correct version of Fig. 8 is presented below.Open in a separate windowFig. 1FE-SEM images of MWCNT/Te nanorod composites with various MWCNT contents (a) 1 wt%, (b) 3 wt%, and (c) 5 wt%.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: Facile one-pot synthesis of silver nanoparticles encapsulated in natural polymeric urushiol for marine antifouling

Correction for ‘Facile one-pot synthesis of silver nanoparticles encapsulated in natural polymeric urushiol for marine antifouling’ by Lu Zheng et al., RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 13936–13943, DOI: 10.1039/D0RA02205E.

The authors regret that an incorrect version of Fig. 2 was included in the original article. The correct version of Fig. 2 is presented below.Open in a separate windowFig. 2TEM images of PUL/AgNPs (a–d); EDS of AgNPs (e); UV-vis spectra of AgNPs (f); FT-IR spectra of urushiol (U); PUL/AgNPs (g); XRD image of AgNPs (h).The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: Bio-conjugation of graphene quantum dots for targeting imaging

Correction for ‘Bio-conjugation of graphene quantum dots for targeting imaging’ by Fei Jia et al., RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 53532–53536.

The authors regret that the versions of Fig. 2 and ​and44 displayed in the original article were incorrect. The loading dye in Fig. 2c should be the artificial marker for molecular weight analysis. The original Fig. 4 did not support the EGFR binding due to the cell endocytosis, and the result has been revised with an improved data set. The correct versions of Fig. 2 and ​and44 are shown below.Open in a separate windowFig. 2(a) The sucrose DGU gradient used for purifying the conjugates. (b) The desired SA@GQDs positions in the DGU column. (c) PL image of the DGU column after ultracentrifuge. (d) Bolt 4–12% Bis–Tris gel electrophoresis analysis of SA@GQDs, anti-mouse@GQDs and Erbitux@GQDs, respectively. The loading dye with confirmed molecule weight was tested as references. (e) The cell viability of conjugate Erbitux@GQDs (SCC cell).Open in a separate windowFig. 4(a) SCC cell imaging by Erbitux@GQDs which is binding to the EGFR receptor of SCC cell membrane. (b) The bright field, and PL picture at different channels. After merging the PL picture of Dapi and GFP channels, the successful staining of membrane and nucleus was observed. The quantum yield of GQDs is much lower than Dapi, and we have to tune the contrast/brightness to reach the same quality between Dapi and GQDs. The emission of Dapi also has some signal in GQDs channel, and we have re-draw the data to get rid of the Dapi signal.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: A novel G·G·T non-conventional intramolecular triplex formed by the double repeat sequence of Chlamydomonas telomeric DNA

Correction for ‘A novel G·G·T non-conventional intramolecular triplex formed by the double repeat sequence of Chlamydomonas telomeric DNA’ by Aparna Bansal et al., RSC Adv., 2022, 12, 15918–15924, https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA00861K.

The authors regret that an incorrect version of Fig. 6 was included in the original article. The correct version of Fig. 6 is presented below.Open in a separate windowFig. 6Proposed model of the non-conventional triplex comprising G·G·T triplets formed by Chlm2.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: Preparation of glycerol monostearate from glycerol carbonate and stearic acid

Correction for ‘Preparation of glycerol monostearate from glycerol carbonate and stearic acid’ by Li Han et al., RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 34137–34145.

The authors regret that Fig. 6 in the original article was incorrect. The caption referred to ¹³C NMR spectra, whereas the figure itself was an expanded version of the ¹H NMR shown in Fig. 5. The correct version of Fig. 6 is presented below.Open in a separate windowFig. 6 ¹³C NMR spectra of GMS.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: Structure evolution,amorphization and nucleation studies of carbon-lean to -rich SiBCN powder blends prepared by mechanical alloying

Correction for ‘Structure evolution, amorphization and nucleation studies of carbon-lean to -rich SiBCN powder blends prepared by mechanical alloying’ by Daxin Li et al., RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 48255–48271.

The authors regret that Fig. 13 was displayed incorrectly in the original article. Due to a data processing error, partially repetitive data was displayed for the entry for 10 h. The correct version of Fig. 13 is shown below.Open in a separate windowFig. 13Solid-state ²⁹Si NMR spectra of carbon-lean C2 (a) and carbon-rich C9 (b) powder blends subjected to different hours of milling.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: Chemoselective and one-pot synthesis of novel coumarin-based cyclopenta[c]pyrans via base-mediated reaction of α,β-unsaturated coumarins and β-ketodinitriles

Correction for ‘Chemoselective and one-pot synthesis of novel coumarin-based cyclopenta[c]pyrans via base-mediated reaction of α,β-unsaturated coumarins and β-ketodinitriles’ by Behnaz Farajpour et al., RSC Adv., 2022, 12, 7262–7267, DOI: 10.1039/D2RA00594H.

The authors regret that an incorrect version of Fig. 4 was included in the original article. The correct version of Fig. 4 is presented below. The CCDC number was also incorrectly cited for this same compound (compound 3d) and should instead be cited as 1970237.Open in a separate windowFig. 1ORTEP diagram of 3d (CCDC 1970237).The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: Privileged substructures for anti-sickling activity via cheminformatic analysis

Correction for ‘Privileged substructures for anti-sickling activity via cheminformatic analysis’ by Chuleeporn Phanus-umporn et al., RSC Adv., 2018, 8, 5920–5935.

Errors were present in the published version of Fig. 2; the correct version is shown below:Open in a separate windowFig. 2Workflow of CSAR modeling for investigating anti-sickling activity.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.     

Correction: Variation in surface properties,metabolic capping,and antibacterial activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles: comparison of bio-fabrication potential in phytohormone-regulated cell cultures and naturally grown plants

Correction for ‘Variation in surface properties, metabolic capping, and antibacterial activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles: comparison of bio-fabrication potential in phytohormone-regulated cell cultures and naturally grown plants’ by Tariq Khan et al., RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 38831–38840, DOI: 10.1039/D0RA08419K.

The authors regret that an incorrect version of Fig. 7 was included in the original article. The correct version of Fig. 7 is presented below.Open in a separate windowFig. 7Venn diagram for the comparative analysis of compounds detected through LC-MS/MS.The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.