小切口加腱皮减张缝合法治疗闭合性跟腱断裂22例

目的 探讨急性闭合性跟腱断裂一种新的治疗方法。方法 从1994年～2001年8月，采用小切口加腱皮减rner-Lindholm疗效评定标准，优19例(86．4％)，良3例(13．6％)，优良率达100％。结论 小切口加腱皮减张缝合法治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂，能有效分散断端张力，有效保护断端血供，创伤小，伤口无异物反应，再断裂及感染机会少，功能恢复快，是治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂的较好方法。     

小切口Kessler缝合法治疗新鲜闭合性跟腱断裂

目的 探讨应用小切口Kessler缝合法治疗新鲜闭合性跟腱断裂的临床疗效.方法2005年1月至2007年12月共收治37例新鲜闭合性跟腱断裂患者,男22例,女15例;年龄21～59岁,平均41.3岁.跟腱断裂部位:止点断裂8例,断端距止点<1.5 cm 5例,体部断裂20例,断端距止点3～6 cm 4例.37例患者均于伤后7 d内(平均4.6 d)采用小切口Kessler缝合法治疗,术后早期进行功能锻炼.根据Arner-Lindholm评分标准评定疗效.结果 37例患者术后获18～36个月(平均27个月)随访.术后无切口表浅或深部感染、皮缘坏死等并发症发生,无跟腱再断裂.术后疗效根据Arner-Lindholm评分标准评定:优30例,良7例,优良率为100%.结论应用小切口暴露方法修复新鲜跟腱断裂并结合早期功能锻炼可获得满意的临床疗效.     

腱束编织缝合结合Bunnell法治疗闭合性跟腱断裂

[目的]观察腱束编织缝合结合Bunnell法治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂的临床疗效。[方法]2013年5月~2016年3月,采用腱束分组编织缝合法结合Bunnell缝合法治疗急性跟腱断裂24例,术后观察皮肤切口并发症及功能恢复情况。[结果]所有患者均获得12~36个月随访,平均(27.88±6.52)个月。1例患者出现局限皮肤浅层坏死,经换药后痊愈,其余患者均Ⅰ期愈合。1例术后4周因意外伤致跟腱不全撕裂,经保守治疗后痊愈,其余患者均未出现跟腱再断裂。所有患者均未出现医源性神经损伤、下肢深静脉血栓等并发症。术后返回工作岗位的时间为9~15周,平均(11.83±2.16)周。术后1年美国足踝外科协会(American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society,AOFAS)踝-后足功能评分86~100分,平均(94.42±3.75)分。[结论]采用腱束编织缝合结合Bunnell法治疗闭合性跟腱断裂操作相对简单,修复效果可靠,切口并发症少,适用于有运动需求的中青年人。     

小切口微创技术治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂

目的:探讨采用小切口行微创缝合治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂的临床效果。方法:2012年4月至2013年10月,对14例14足急性闭合性跟腱断裂的患者采用小切口微创技术修复跟腱,其中男9例,女5例;年龄25～49岁,平均30.5岁;受伤至手术时间1～13 d,平均8 d.在跟腱断裂处正中偏内侧行1.5～2.0 cm小切口,用卵圆钳导入缝针,微创缝合修复跟腱断裂。术后常规康复锻炼。结果:14例中2例创口局部持续渗出,经换药好转,其余均Ⅰ期愈合。所有患者获随访,时间6～24个月,平均11个月。美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)踝与后足评分92.71±6.58(82～100分).结论:小切口微创修复急性闭合性跟腱断裂损伤小,并发症少,恢复快,操作简单,适合在基层医院开展。     

改良小切口双津下缝合法治疗急性跟腱断裂

目的探讨改良小切口双津下缝合法治疗急性跟腱断裂的临床疗效。方法采用改良小切口双津下缝合法治疗27例急性跟腱断裂患者。记录手术相关指标、住院天数和术后并发症发生情况。术后3、6个月采用Arner-Lindholm跟腱功能和AOFAS踝-后足功能评分评价疗效。结果患者在术后3、6个月均获得随访。切口均一期愈合,术后均无二次断裂、切口感染及腓肠神经损伤发生。Arner-Lindholm跟腱功能评分优良率:术后3个月为74. 1%(20/27),术后6个月为92. 6%(25/27)。AOFAS踝-后足评分:术前1 d为28～46(32. 2±12. 5)分,术后3个月为75～94(84. 2±8. 4)分,术后6个月为92～100(95. 2±5. 1)分。结论改良小切口双津下缝合法修复急性跟腱断裂可减少术后切口皮缘坏死和跟腱粘连的发生,踝关节活动恢复好,创伤小,康复快,临床疗效满意。     

导针引导微创缝合治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂

目的探讨应用硬膜外穿刺导针引导,微创小切口缝合急性闭合性跟腱断裂的手术疗效。方法急性跟腱断裂病人29例,根据治疗方式不同分为导针引导微创小切口缝合组16例,传统开放缝合组13例。病人于伤后5小时～5天内行跟腱手术修补,术后行个性化长腿及短腿石膏固定,功能锻炼1～2个月;所有病人随访至少1年;比较病人手术时间,术后并发症(切口感染,腓肠神经损伤,跟腱再断裂)和术前、术后1年美国矫形足踝协会评分(AOFAS)及跟腱完全断裂评分(ATRS)。结果传统开放缝合组手术时间为(48.91±12.56)分钟,微创组(41.78±9.56)分钟,两者比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);两组均未出现术后腓肠神经损伤及跟腱再断裂情况,传统组在随访期间出现3例皮肤感染坏死/延迟愈合;截至随访结束,两组病人术前术后AOFAS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),但两组间术后AOFAS及ATRS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论经导针引导下微创治疗跟腱断裂手术时间略长,但与常规手术比较,能有效避免术后并发症。     

应用双津下缝合法修复跟腱断裂疗效分析

目的探讨采用0号可吸收普迪思圈套线(PDS-Ⅱ线)双津下缝合法修复跟腱断裂的临床疗效。方法 2005年1月-2008年12月,收治36例跟腱断裂患者。男29例,女7例;年龄21～50岁,平均36岁。运动损伤25例,摔伤4例,锐器割伤6例,其他伤1例。新鲜闭合损伤22例,新鲜开放损伤6例,伤后至入院时间1～10 d,平均6 d;陈旧性闭合损伤8例,伤后至入院时间43～63 d,平均51 d。提踵试验及Thopmson征均呈阳性。患者均采用0号可吸收PDS-Ⅱ线双津下缝合法修复。术后于踝跖屈30°位短腿石膏固定6周后,开始功能锻炼。结果术后2例陈旧性跟腱断裂患者切口愈合不良,经对症治疗后切口愈合;其余切口均Ⅰ期愈合。患者均获随访,随访时间12～24个月,平均15个月。随访期间均未发生跟腱再次断裂及反射性交感神经营养不良。患者踝关节活动度与健侧相比,7例无减少,16例减少1～10°,12例减少10～20°,1例减少25°。根据Termann跟腱损伤临床评价标准,评分为74～96分,平均90分;获优24例,良11例,可1例,优良率为97.2%。结论双津下缝合法手术操作简便,缝线在腱内无横行交叉,修复断裂跟腱后对其血运影响小。PDS-Ⅱ线可提供高强度张力,并可完全吸收,不易发生局部粘连。采用该方法修复跟腱断裂术后并发症发生率较低,可获得较好疗效。     

钢丝Bunnel缝合法治疗跟腱断裂

跟腱断裂是临床较常见的一种运动性损伤。我院自1998年6月～2003年6月采用钢丝Bunnel缝合法治疗急性跟腱断裂18例20侧，效果良好，报告如下。     

带孔钢针微创Bunnell缝合治疗新鲜闭合性跟腱断裂

[目的]探讨应用带孔钢针微创Bunnell缝合法治疗新鲜跟腱断裂的临床疗效.[方法]回顾性分析2007年1月～ 2010年12月采用带孔钢针微创Bunnell缝合法(微创组)52例及传统切开手术(切开组)31例并获得随访的新鲜跟腱断裂患者资料.观察两组手术时间、术中出血量、切口愈合时间、切口并发症、跟腱再断裂、优良率、末次随访AOFOS评分等指标.[结果]所有患者随访12 ～ 16个月,平均13.6个月.两组跟腱再断裂、优良率、末次随访AOFOS评分组间比较无显著性意义(P＞0.05).微创组手术时间、切口愈合时间均短于单侧组(P＜0.05),微创组术中出血量、切口并发症均少于单侧组(P＜0.05).[结论]应用带孔钢针微创Bunnell缝合法治疗新鲜跟腱断裂与传统手术方法效果相似,但前者具有手术时间短、创伤小、切口并发症少等优点.     

小切口辅助经皮缝合系统修复急性闭合跟腱断裂并发症

目的：分析小切口辅助经皮修复急性跟腱断裂术后并发症的原因、处置及预防对策。方法 ：回顾性研究2008年8月至2019年11月采用小切口辅助经皮跟腱缝合系统（micro incision percutaneous Achilles tendon suture system,MIPAS）治疗的急性闭合性跟腱断裂患者279例,其中男269例,女10例;右侧96例,左侧183例;年龄18～64(36.9±11.4)岁;伤后至手术时间0.5～7(2.7±0.9) d。收集记录术后18个月内切口相关情况、再断裂、腓肠神经损伤、静脉血栓、跟腱粘连、局部疼痛和踝关节僵硬,以及相应处置措施和并发症转归,总结分析原因和预防策略。结果：所有患者未出现切口浅表及深部感染,未出现症状性跟腱粘连和踝关节僵硬。发生迟发性线结反应2例（0.7%）,再断裂5例（1.8%）,腓肠神经损伤3例（1.1%）,穿刺点皮肤内陷21例（7.5%）,症状性静脉血栓2例（0.7%）,一过性内踝后方疼痛45例（16.1%）。经个体化处理,功能良好,美国足踝外科协会（American Orthopaedic Foot&Ankle ...     

Comparison between tenocutaneous suture and Kessler suture techniques in treating acute closed Achilles tendon rupture

BackgroundTo compare the effectiveness of tenocutaneous suture and conventional Kessler suture techniques in treating acute closed Achilles tendon rupture.MethodsA total of 33 patients with acute closed Achilles tendon rupture who were admitted to our hospital from February 1998 to December 2008 underwent repair with either a tenocutaneous suture or Kessler suture technique. All patients were followed up for 1–5 years (mean, 3 years).ResultsAccording to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle–hindfoot scale, the excellence rate was 91% in the Kessler suture group and 98% in the tenocutaneous suture group, with a significant difference between groups.ConclusionOur tenocutaneous suture technique is an effective method for treating Achilles tendon rupture. It has certain advantages compared with the conventional incision method and is worthy of wide clinical application.     

微创腱皮缝合治疗急性跟腱断裂的生物力学评价

目的评价微创腱皮缝合技术治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂的生物学特性。方法采用微创腱皮缝合和常规Kessler缝合两种方法治疗日本大耳白兔急性闭合性跟腱断裂,取生长14周时的大耳白兔跟腱标本和健侧正常跟腱各5条,分为3组,做生物力学检验。通过对不同分组跟腱的最大载荷、应变值、强度、拉伸刚度、吸收能量和比能以及应力和应变的关系的检测,并做统计学分析。结果通过检测和结果统计分析,3组的生物力学性能均有一定的差异,微创腱皮缝合技术的生物力学特性接近于正常组（P〉0.05）,并且比对照组的力学性能好（P〈0.05）。结论微创腱皮缝合技术具有良好的愈合强度,优于常规直接开放手术方法。     

Rates of complications in Achilles tendon rupture repair using absorbable and nonabsorbable suture material; A systematic review

BackgroundThe impact of suture type on tensile strength, re-rupture rates and infection risk in Achilles tendon rupture repair is not been well established. The aim of this review is to evaluate existing literature on the associated risk of postoperative infection with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials in Achilles tendon rupture repair.MethodsA systematic review of search databases PubMed; Google Scholar; and OVID Medline was made to identify studies related to complications associated with Achilles tendon rupture repair. PRISMA guidelines were utilised for this review. Meta-analysis was used to compare rupture rates and infections following rupture repair.Results12 studies with a total of 460 patients, 230 in both nonabsorbable and absorbable suture groups were included for analysis. Risk of wound complications was significantly higher in patients with non-absorbable sutures (p < 0.001).ConclusionNonabsorbable braided sutures is associated with the highest risk of postoperative wound complications following Achilles tendon rupture repair.     

Achilles tendon rupture

Whereas Achilles tendon rupture is usually treated operatively in central Europe, conservative treatment is felt to be indicated in Britain, North America and the Scandinavian countries. In a prospective randomized trial we compared conservative functional treatment and operative functional treatment with a newly developed boot. Forty-four patients (19 with operative, 25 with conservative treatment) were entered in the study. The initial evaluation included dynamic ultrasonography and MRI in a neutral position and at 20 degrees of plantar flexion to determine the amount of tendon diastasis. Follow-up clinical examination and ultrasonography revealed, no significant differences between the two groups. After 25 months all patients in both groups had complete healing with no rerupture. Functional treatment allows an earlier return to work and earlier resumption of active sport. We observed stable tendon healing, optimal functional results, and a high level of patient satisfaction. Primary functional treatment does not appear to be inferior to operative functional treatment when no more than 5 mm tendon diastasis is observed on the initial ultrasonography in the neutral position.     

Achilles tendon rupture

The treatment of acute of Achilles tendon rupture experienced a dynamic development in the last ten years. Decisive for this development was the application of MRI and above all the ultrasonography in the diagnostics of the pathological changes and injuries of tendons. The question of rupture morphology as well as different courses of healing could be now evaluated objectively. These advances led consequently to new modalities in treatment concepts and rehabilitation protocols. The decisive input for improvements of the outcome results and particularly the shortening of the rehabilitation period came with introduction of the early functional treatment in contrast to immobilizing plaster treatment. In a prospective randomized study (1987-1989) at the Trauma Dept. of the Hannover Medical School could show no statistical differences comparing functional non-operative with functional operative therapy with a special therapy boot (Variostabil/Adidas). The crucial criteria for therapy selection results from the sonographically measured position of the tendon stumps in plantar flexion (20 degrees). With complete adaptation of the tendons' ends surgical treatment does not achieve better results than non-operative functional treatment in term of tendon healing and functional outcome. Regarding the current therapeutic standards each method has is advantages and disadvantages. Both, the operative and non-operative functional treatment enable a stable tendon healing with a low risk of re-rupture (1-2%). Meanwhile there is consensus for early functional after-treatment of the operated Achilles' tendons. There seems to be a trend towards non-operative functional treatment in cases of adequate sonographical findings, or to minimal invasive surgical techniques.     

不剥离骨膜法肋骨钉内固定治疗多发肋骨骨折的随机对照研究

目的 分别运用Achillon吻合器和改良Kessler缝合法治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂,随访比较患者的临床效果和功能恢复情况.方法从2009年3月至2012年2月,随机采用 Achillon吻合器微创修复与改良Kessler缝合法治疗49例急性闭合性跟腱断裂.其中Achillon 微创修复28例,改良Kessler法缝合21例.两组均无需行拇长屈肌或腓肠肌延长术.本研究平均随访21个月,分别在术后1周、第6个月、第12个月、随访结束期4个时间段,对两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、切口长度、踝关节运动范围、美国足踝外科协会（AOFAS）踝-后足疗效评分进行评价.结果在术后1周内,Achillon组发生1例神经损伤,改良Kessler组发生2例创口浅表感染,1例延迟愈合.两组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义（P=0.41）.在第6月,Achillon组AOFAS评分要优于改良Kessler组,第12月时两组无明显差异.术后两组踝关节运动范围,差异无统计学意义.截止随访结束时,所有患者均恢复到受伤前运动水平.结论两种缝合方法均能取得良好的疗效,相比改良Kessler缝合法,采用Achillon吻合器具有切口小、住院时间短、功能恢复快、术后美观等优点.