Filling Sensations after Restorative Proctocolectomy

Objective : in order to improve insights in rectal filling sensation, we studied pouch filling sensations after ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) before and after re-establishment of bowel continuity.

Methods : anal manometry and a pouch filling sensation test were performed before as well as 1 and 6 weeks after closure of the loop ileostomy in 17 patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy with stapled (8 patients) or manual pouch-anal anastomosis (9 patients). The results were compared with those of 12 control subjects. Results : before ileostomy closure, pouch pressure necessary for inducing the respective sensation thresholds was higher than in controls; the difference was significant for constant and urge sensation. The volumes for urge and maximum tolerable sensation level were significantly lower, with reduced pouch compliance. After stoma closure, pressure and volume thresholds at all sensation levels became completely comparable with control data. No relevant differences were observed between stapled and manual ileal pouch-anal anastomoses.

Conclusions : all levels of filling sensation levels are preserved after restorative proctocolectomy and their parameters are comparable with those of normal rectal filling sensation. Diversion of an ileal J pouch results in resetting of filling sensation thresholds towards lower volume and higher pressure values, but all sensation thresholds normalize within 6 weeks after stoma closure. These data document that neither the rectum, nor the mucosa of the anorectal junction and upper part of the anal canal are involved in filling and urge sensation.     

Differences in ano‐neorectal physiology of ileoanal and coloanal reconstructions for restorative proctectomy

Objective Restorative proctectomy with straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) and restorative proctocolectomy with ilealpouch‐anal anastomosis (IPAA) are options for maintaining bowel integrity after rectal resection. The aim of this study was to compare clinical function and anorectal physiology in patients treated with CAA and IPAA. Method Three‐dimensional vector‐manometry and neorectal volumetry were performed in straight CAA [53 patients (34 male)] and IPAA [61 patients (39 male)] for ulcerative colitis. Function was assessed using a 14 day incontinence diary. Results Function was similar in both groups, but neorectal compliance and threshold volumes for sensation, urge and maximum tolerated volume (MTV) were significantly higher after IPAA than after CAA. Mean pressure, vector volume and sphincter symmetry at rest were significant determinants of continence in both groups but squeeze pressure did not correlate significantly with function in either group. Threshold volume, MTV, and compliance were significantly correlated with frequency of defecation in patients with IPAA but not with CAA. Conclusion A strong consistent resting anal sphincter pressure is one determinant of continence after both IPAA and CAA. Squeeze pressures do not influence the functional result. In IPAA but not CAA, the neorectum has a reservoir function which correlates with the postoperative frequency of defaecation.     

Volvulus of ileal S-pouch: A rare complication of ileal pouch anal anastomoses

INTRODUCTION

Ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) after total proctocolectomy is a frequently performed surgery for medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Volvulus of the ileal pouch as a complication of IPAA is extremely rare. We present a case of volvulus of S-type ileal pouch.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 28 year old male, with history of total proctocolectomy with IPAA for severe UC in 2009 presented with signs of bowel obstruction. Emergency laparotomy was done and a volvulus of the S-type ileal pouch was derotated and pouchpexy done.

DISCUSSION

The IPAA has a wide spectrum of complications, with obstruction of proximal small bowel occurring frequently. Volvulus of the ileal pouch is extremely rare with only 3 reported cases. Early diagnosis and intervention is important to salvage the pouch. Computed tomography (CT) may aid the diagnosis in stable patients.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of ileal pouch volvulus although rare, should be kept in mind when dealing with patients complaining of recurrent obstruction following IPAA.     

Long-term outcome 10 years or more after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis

Purpose  

The aim of this study was to assess quality of life (QOL) in a long-term follow-up of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) 10 years and more after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) to correlate these results with pouch function and to assess the long-term pouch failure rate.     

Preservation of continence after ileoanal anastomosis by the coordination of ileal pouch and anal canal motor activity.

Nocturnal incontinence may occur after ileoanal anastomosis and may be related to loss of an effective anal canal pressure barrier during sleep; how pressure and contractions in the proximal bowel influence this barrier is unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between anal canal pressure and contractions and contractile activity of the pouch in continent subjects after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and of the rectum in normal controls. A fully ambulatory system for 24-hour pressure recording was used. A flexible transducer catheter was introduced endoscopically so that sensors were at 2, 3, 8, 12, 16, and 24 cm from the anal orifice in 12 healthy controls (7 men, 5 women, mean age: 35 years) and 7 fully continent IPAA patients (4 men, 3 women, mean age: 34 years) more than 12 months postoperatively. Twenty-four hour spontaneous motor activity was stored in a 2.5 megabyte (MB) digital portable recorder. Mean anal canal pressure was calculated, and rectal motor complexes and ileal pouch large pressure waves were characterized. During sleep, resting anal canal pressures were similar in the two groups (72 +/- 12 mm Hg in controls versus 66 +/- 9 mm Hg in IPAA patients [mean +/- standard deviation (SD)], p = NS), but anal canal pressure showed cyclic relaxations (periodicity: 95 +/- 11 min in controls, 54 +/- 18 min in IPAA patients, p less than 0.05), during which the mean pressure trough was 15 +/- 4 mm Hg in controls and 14 +/- 5 mm Hg in IPAA patients (p = NS). In the control patients, during sleep, a mean of six rectal motor complexes were identified (range: 3 to 9). In patients with IPAA, during sleep, a mean of eight large pressure waves per hour were identified (range: 2 to 20). Importantly, in both controls and patients, rectal motor complexes or large pressure waves were always accompanied by rapid return of anal canal pressure from trough to basal values and increased contractile activity. We concluded that, in healthy patients and in continent patients after IPAA, motor activity of the rectum and of the ileal pouch was associated with changes in pressure and contractile activity of the anal canal so that rectal- and neorectal-anal canal pressure gradient, and, in turn, fecal continence were preserved.     

Langzeitergebnisse der Kontinenzfunktion nach ileoanaler Pouch-Anlage

An important aim of proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is to maintain anal continence. Anal sphincter disruption during IPAA is felt to play an important role in loss of continence, which is described in up to 30% of the treated patients in the early postoperative period. Although sphincter function recovers gradually after surgery, some patients stay incontinent. In our investigation of possible parameters involved in preservation of continence after this operative procedure, we focused on changes in anal manometry. We compared these findings with the functional results obtained by questioning the patients and physical examination. Anal manometry was performed with a low-compliance hydraulic perfusion system. All patients underwent a J-pouch procedure with a short rectal cuff for ileoanal reconstruction. We examined 25 patients, 13 underwent operation for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, 12 because of adenomatous polyposis. In the colitis and polyposis group, 28% of the patients reported events of soiling. Three patients (12%) were incontinent. The remaining 15 patients were completely continent. The median time after operation was 58 months, ranging from 12 to 96 months. Comparing the results of anal manometry with standard values of ten age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers, it was found that there was a significant increase in the threshold of balloon awareness and urge to defecate. These sensations were sometimes elicited by pouch contractions. Median pouch- compliance was also clearly elevated in comparison to rectal compliance (P<0.005). Inhibitory reflexes during balloon inflation could not be evoked in any of the patients. Comparing continent with incontinent patients there were significant differences in balloon awareness, urge to defecate, and stool frequency (P<0.01,P<0.01 andP<0.001, respectively). But in contrast to other publications, we could not find significant differences in anal sphincter length, resting and squeezing, anal canal pressure. Pouch compliance was lowered in incontinent patients and negatively correlated with stool frequency (P<0.001,r=?0.82). In conclusion, our study indicates that anal sphincter resting pressure alone is not a crucial factor in continence preservation in the long-term after total proctocolectomy and IPAA. Poor pouch- compliance and concomitant higher stool frequencies seem to be related to incontinence in this patient group.     

腹腔镜下全结直肠切除、回肠储袋肛管吻合术治疗溃疡性结肠炎38例临床疗效分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜下行全结直肠切除、回肠储袋肛管吻合术（IPAA）治疗溃疡性结肠炎（UC）的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析南京军区南京总医院普通外科2014年1月至2015年9月行腹腔镜下IPAA治疗的38例UC病人的术中和术后临床资料,探讨该术式的技术要点及治疗效果。结果 38例病人均成功实施 IPAA,34例病人实施腹腔镜下二期手术,4例病人实施三期手术,其中2例在第二期时中转开腹。22例为激素或挽救治疗失败的重症UC病人。手术中位时间为340（210～470）min。术后1例病人发生储袋肛管吻合口瘘,1例发生储袋顶端瘘,均经保守治疗治愈。术后3个月时随访病人平均排便次数为（4.75 ± 1.24）次/d,克利夫兰总体生活质量评价（CGQL）为0.85 ± 0.08。结论 采用腹腔镜技术行IPAA治疗UC安全可行,术后病人排便功能及生活质量满意。部分重度活动期UC病人也可实施二期手术。     

��ǻ����ȫ��ֱ���г����س������ع��Ǻ������������Խ᳦��38���ٴ���Ч����

??Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: An analysis of clinical outcomes in 38 patients GONG Jian-feng, WEI Yao, GU Li-li, et al. Department of General Surgery, the General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command of PLA, Nanjing 210002, China
Corresponding author: ZHU Wei-ming, E-mail: juwiming@126.com
Abstract Objective To investigate the feasibility and outcome of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods The clinical data of 38 patients undergoing laparoscopic IPAA in Department of General Surgery, the General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command of PLA from January 2014 to September 2015 were analyzed retrospectively, and technical notes were summarized. Results Laparoscopic IPAA was performed in 34 patients with two-stage surgery , 4 patients with three-stage surgery, and 2 patients had conversion. Twenty-two patients had acute severe UC with intravenous steroid or salvage therapy failure. Median operation time was 340 (210—470) min. Two fistulas occurred after surgery, one at pouch-anal anastomosis and one at the tip of the pouch. Both were successfully treated non-operatively. Defecation frequency 3 months after surgery was 4.75 ± 1.24 times per day. The mean Cleveland Global Quality of Life was 0.85 ± 0.08. Conclusion Laparoscopic IPAA for UC is safe and feasible, and postoperative defecation and quality of life are satisfactory. A two-stage surgery is suitable for selected patients with acute severe UC.     

全大肠切除回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的远期疗效评价

目的　探讨全大肠切除回肠贮袋肛管吻合术治疗溃疡性结肠炎 (UC)和家族性腺瘤性息肉病 (FAP)的远期疗效。方法　 1985～ 2 0 0 2年间共对 6 1例患者行全结肠直肠切除回肠贮袋肛管吻合术 ,其中UC 2 5例、FAP 34例、其他 2例 ,应用S袋 2 5例、S J袋 13例、J袋 17例以及W袋 6例 ,术后随诊 1～ 18年、平均 8年 ,比较分析术后控便功能及并发症。结果　全部患者存活。并发症发生率为 16 % ( 10 / 6 1) ,其中UC患者 ( 2 4 % ,6 / 2 5 )高于FAP患者 ( 12 % ,4 / 34) ,W袋高于其他各袋 ,手法吻合 ( 2 0 % ,8/ 4 1)高于吻合器吻合 ( 10 % ,2 / 2 0 ) ,但差异均无显著性 (P >0 0 5 )。术后 2 4h大便次数平均为 4 2次。日间 84 % ( 4 3/ 5 1)、夜间 75 % ( 38/ 5 1)的患者排便能自控 ,6 % ( 3/ 5 1)的患者有明显的大便失禁。大部分患者对目前的生活质量表示满意。结论　全大肠切除回肠贮袋肛管吻合术治疗可维持UC与FAP患者肛管自控功能和可接受的大便次数 ,术后并发症较少 ,是较为理想的手术方式     

Early first episode of pouchitis after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for pediatric ulcerative colitis is a risk factor for development of chronic pouchitis

BackgroundThe predictive factors for chronic pouchitis after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) in pediatric-onset ulcerative colitis (UC) remain unclear. This study evaluated the predictive factors for chronic pouchitis after IPAA in patients with pediatric UC.MethodsThe data from 52 patients with pediatric-onset UC who underwent IPAA in Mie University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The endoscopy surveillance was performed yearly or at the timing of the symptom. Chronic pouchitis was defined as antibiotic-dependent/-refractory and relapsing cases. Potential predictors of chronic pouchitis were analyzed.ResultsDuring the first 5 years after IPAA, pouchitis was identified in 32.7%. Of these patients, 12 (70.6%) developed chronic pouchitis. The predictor of chronic pouchitis was a preoperative history of immunomodulator use before IPAA (p = 0.04). Life table analysis revealed that patients with chronic pouchitis tended to develop pouchitis earlier after IPAA than did patients without chronic pouchitis (p = 0.012). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the occurrence of pouchitis within 15 months after IPAA surgery predicted the development of chronic pouchitis (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 80%).ConclusionIn pediatric patients with UC, the predictive factors for chronic pouchitis are immunomodulator use and early occurrence of the first episode of pouchitis within 15 months after IPAA.Level of evidenceIII     

The correlation between quality of life and functional outcome in ulcerative colitis patients after proctocolectomy ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcome and quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing proctocolectomy ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA), to assess the correlation between functional outcome and QOL, and to identify factors influencing functional outcome and QOL in these patients. Background IPAA is now considered the procedure of choice for ulcerative colitis. Functional outcome and QOL are important factors in evaluating operative outcome. Methods All patients with UC who had undergone IPAA at our institute during the period 1990–2001 were included. QOL and functional outcome were evaluated by mailed questionnaires. QOL was scored using the Short Form 36 (SF‐36). Global Assessment of Function Scale was used to evaluate functional outcome. Results Data were obtained in 77 of 99 patients (78%), with the median age of 38 years. Median follow up time was 4.25 years. The QOL in patients after pelvic pouch procedure was excellent, with scores equal to published norms for the Israeli general population in most scales. Functional outcome and QOL scores correlated strongly (r > 0.5; P < 0.0001) in all dimensions. Older age was associated with lower scores in both functional outcome and QOL scales (P < 0.0001). Conclusions This study demonstrates a strong association between functional outcome and QOL in patients after IPAA. These patients, however, have a QOL that is comparable with the general population. Age at time of surgery strongly influences both functional outcome and QOL. This finding has to be taken into consideration in pre‐operative counseling.     

直肠手术各种储袋的应用与评价

结肠储袋能改善低位直肠切除保肛术后早期控制排粪功能障碍,但其对患者术后远期（2年以上）控制排粪功能方面不具有优势。同时,随着时间的延长,排空障碍的发生率将逐渐提高,很多患者出现排粪困难,需要长期应用栓剂和灌肠。而储袋的制作延长了手术时间,增加了治疗费用。所以,低位直肠切除术后结肠储袋的价值正在遭受质疑,它的应用也变得越来越少。在溃疡性结肠炎（UC）和家族性腺瘤性息肉病（FAP）行全结肠切除术后,如果行回肠储袋肛管吻合（IPAA）,可通过增加新建直肠的容积并改变肠管的生理学动力,使排粪次数减少;且术后短期和长期控制排粪功能更好,生活质量更高。所以,IPAA是手术治疗UC和FAP的首选。     

Early ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis in children: Similar outcome to delayed pouch construction despite higher comorbidity

BackgroundChildren with ulcerative colitis (UC) may undergo a staged approach for restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). Previous studies in adults suggest a decreased morbidity with delayed pouch creation, but pediatric studies are limited. We compared outcomes for delayed versus early pouch construction in children.MethodsPatients with UC undergoing IPAA were selected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database from 2012 to 2018. Patients were categorized as early (2-stage) or delayed (3-stage) pouch construction based on Current Procedural Terminology codes. Our primary outcome was any adverse event. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to assess the relationship between timing of pouch creation and adverse events.ResultsWe identified 371 children who underwent IPAA: 157 (42.3%) had early pouch creation and 214 (57.6%) had a delayed pouch. Those with an early pouch creation were more likely to have exposure to immunosuppressants (11% vs. 5%, p = 0.017) and steroids (30% vs. 10%, p < 0.001) at the time of surgery. After controlling for patient characteristics, there were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups.ConclusionsChildren undergoing early pouch creation have increased exposure to steroids and immune suppressants; nevertheless, no differences in adverse events were identified.Level of evidenceII     

Prevalence and risk factors for adenomas in the ileal pouch and the afferent loop after restorative proctocolectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

Background

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the treatment of choice in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) to prevent the risk of colorectal cancer. However, it currently is recognized that adenomas may develop in the ileal pouch. The risk of adenoma occurring in the afferent ileal loop above the pouch is less clearly identified. This study aimed to evaluate the difference in prevalence of adenomas between the ileal pouch and the afferent ileum after IPAA in FAP.

Methods

The study analyzed 442 endoscopies performed between 2003 and 2008 for 139 FAP patients. The patients had undergone an IPAA in 118 cases, an ileorectal anastomosis in 13 cases, or an ileostomy in 8 cases.

Results

Among the 118 IPAA patients, 57 (48.3 %) had pouch adenomas a median of 15 years after surgery. The risk factors for pouch adenomas were delay since pouch construction [odds ratio (OR), 1.11; p = 0.016] and presence of advanced duodenal adenomas (OR, 4.35; p = 0.011). Seven patients had pouch adenomas with high-grade dysplasia. Only nine patients had afferent ileal loop adenomas (6.5 %). The only significant risk factor for ileal adenomas was the presence of pouch adenomas (OR, 2.16; p = 0.007).

Conclusion

After restorative proctocolectomy in FAP, adenoma recurrence is frequent in the pouch, with a higher risk for patients with advanced duodenal adenomas and an increasing risk over time, whereas adenomas are rarely found in the afferent ileal loop. This finding may help to propose redo ileal pouch anal anastomosis if required.     

Postoperative defecatory function of an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after a restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: evaluation using fecoflowmetry

An ileal pouch is usually reconstructed as an alternative to a neorectum after a total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the real defecatory function of an ileal pouch is uncertain. This study was designed to analyze the functional and clinical outcomes after a proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for UC using fecoflowmetry (FFM). Sixteen patients who underwent IPAA for UC between 1990 and 2005 were studied. They were evaluated by FFM, together with Kelly's clinical score (KCS), and anorectal manometric assessments were also performed. FFM showed that the fecoflow pattern (FFP) of 14 patients (87%) was the block type and of 2 patients (13%) was the segmental type. The clinical score and tolerance volume showed no improvement 1 year or more after IPAA. However, the value of the maximum fecal stream flow rate (Fmax) improved with time. FFM shows that the defecatory function improved after IPAA, and it may therefore contribute to a good long-term outcome after the surgery.     

Pathological subgroups may predict complications but not late failure after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for indeterminate colitis

Introduction Ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis (IPAA) for indeterminate colitis (IndC) may lead to an increased risk of perineal complications and pouch loss. This study evaluated pathological subgroups of IndC to identify a predictor of increased complication rates after IPAA for IndC. Patients and methods Of 171 IPAAs with a postoperative diagnosis of IndC, IndC was confirmed in 115 of the 140 specimens available for re‐examination. These were divided into IndC favouring ulcerative colitis (Group I; n = 99), ‘true’ IndC (Group II; n = 8), and IndC favouring Crohn's (Group III; n = 8). 61 presented with fulminant colitis. Patients in Group I were subdivided into having (A) deep ulcers (B) transmural lymphoid aggregates (C) skip lesions (D) terminal ileal inflammation and/or (E) a caecal patch. Outcome was determined by chart analysis, and compared to 231 randomly selected patients with IPAA for ulcerative colitis (UC) matched for age, gender, and follow‐up. Results Only patients with evidence of deep ulceration (Group IA) had a significant increase in the incidence of Crohn's disease (4.3%vs. 0.43%, P = 0.04), complex perianal fistulae (4.3%vs. 0.43%, P = 0.04), and pelvic abscess (12.9%vs. 2.2%, P < 0.001). No pathological subgroup of IndC patients had a significantly different rate of pouch failure or pouch loss. Conclusions Pathological stratification may predict those more likely to develop Crohn's disease or other complications, but not pouch failure. On this basis, we feel that patients with IndC should not be precluded from having IPAA surgery.     

Do preoperative factors predict subsequent diagnosis of Crohn’s disease after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for ulcerative or indeterminate colitis?

Aim The aim of this study was to determine preoperative clinical factors associated with subsequent diagnosis revision to Crohn’s disease (CD) following total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) or indeterminate colitis (IC) patients. Method Presumed UC and IC patients undergoing IPAA from a large single‐institution prospective database with change of diagnosis to CD were identified and compared with patients without diagnosis change. Results A total of 2814 patients (47% male, median age 37 years) with presumed UC (85%) or IC (15%) underwent primary IPAA. At a median follow up of 9.6 years, 184 (7%) had the diagnosis revised to CD from histopathological examination of the colectomy specimen immediately in 97 (53%) or at a median interval of 36 months in 87 (47%). CD and UC/IC patients had had a similar operative technique, length of stay and 30‐day morbidity. The postoperative CD diagnosis was associated with a preoperative diagnosis of IC (P < 0.0001) and perianal fistula (P = 0.002). Patients with a delayed diagnosis of CD were associated with a 3‐stage procedure (P < 0.0001, OR = 2.8) (95% CI = 1.8–4.4), colonic stricture (P = 0.04, OR = 2.9 [95% CI = 1.1–7.4]), perianal fistula (P = 0.02, OR = 2.9 [95% CI = 1.2–7.2]), oral ulceration (P = 0.009, OR = 3.8 [95% CI = 1.2–9.6]) and younger age (P < 0.0001, OR = 0.048 [95% CI = 0.011–0.19]). Conclusion A few patients having IPAA for presumed UC/IC were subsequently diagnosed to have CD which was associated with perianal fistula and the diagnosis of postoperative preoperative IC. The delayed diagnosis of CD was associated with a three‐stage procedure, colorectal stricture, anal fissure, mouth ulceration and younger age.     

Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the literature of ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) regarding complications and functional outcome, to provide audit data for individual surgeons and units to assess their own performance against and also to serve as reference standard for the assessment of novel alternatives. BACKGROUND: IPAA is the standard restorative procedure for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This operation is, however, associated with distinct rates of failure, complications and fecal incontinence. METHODS: A meta-analysis on pooled incidences of complications of IPAA was conducted. Medline search and cross-reference search identified studies on IPAA (n > or = 50). Two authors independently performed the data extraction on study characteristics, diagnosis, type of operation, pouch-related complications, pouch failure and functional results. In case of disagreement consensus was reached by joint review of the study. Estimates of pouch-related complications, pouch failure and functional results are described as pooled percentages with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: The initial search based on 1,206 abstracts yielded 43 studies eligible for further analysis. Indications for IPAA were UC in 87.5%, FAP in 8.9% and other diagnoses in 3.6%. The median follow-up was 36.7 months. Pouch failure was 6.8%, increasing to 8.5% in case of follow-up of more than 60 months. Pelvic sepsis occurred in 9.5%. Severe, mild and urge fecal incontinence were reported in 3.7, 17, and 7.3%, respectively. No effect of experience, duration of follow-up and type of surgical technique on the incidence of pouch failure and pelvic sepsis was demonstrable. CONCLUSIONS: Current techniques for restorative surgery after proctocolectomy are associated with non-negligible complication rates and leave room for improvement and continuation of development of alternative procedures.     

Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis

This study was conducted to determine whether stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis (IACA) preserving the anal transitional zone (ATZ) or hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with mucosectomy (IPAA) is more beneficial in achieving disease eradication and better postoperative function. IACA was performed in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 10 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), 15 of whom were examined proctoscopically. IPAA was performed in 4 patients with UC and 8 patients with FAP. The mean maximum resting pressure (MRP) was 55 mmHg in the IACA group and 34 mmHg in the IPAA group (P < 0.01). The anorectal inhibitory reflex was positive in 18 patients (90%) from the IACA group and 5 (42%) from the IPAA group (P < 0.05). The pre- and postoperative MRPs were 61 mmHg and 55 mmHg, respectively, in the IACA group vs 63 mmHg and 34 mmHg, respectively, in the IPAA group (P < 0.01). Whereas 16 (80%) of the 20 IACA patients could discriminate feces from gas, only 4 (33%) of the 12 IPAA patients could (P < 0.05). The mean observation period was 2.3 years, the mean length of the columnar cuff was 2.8 cm, and no case of dysplasia or adenoma was seen. Postoperative function is more favorable following IACA than following IPAA, both physiologically and symptomatically. However, long-term surveillance of the residual mucosa is necessary before making a final recommendation. Received: April 20, 1999 / Accepted: January 7, 2000     

Chemoradiotherapy followed by restorative proctocolectomy with partial intersphincteric resection for advanced rectal cancer associated with ulcerative colitis: report of a case

The role of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is uncertain for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), when advanced lower rectal cancer is diagnosed. We report what to our knowledge is the first documented case of successful preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by IPAA with partial intersphincteric resection of advanced rectal cancer associated with UC. A 59-year-old woman with a 24-year history of extensive UC was found to have advanced rectal cancer located 2 cm from the anal verge. She underwent preoperative conventional chemoradiotherapy followed by restorative proctocolectomy with total mesorectal excision. The procedure included intersphincteric resection of one quadrant and construction of an IPAA with diverting ileostomy. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the ileostomy was closed 6 months after the initial surgery. The patient was doing well with good pouch function and no evidence of recurrent disease 1 year after her initial surgery.