Inhibition of C6 glioma cell proliferation by anandamide, 1-arachidonoylglycerol,and by a water soluble phosphate ester of anandamide: variability in response and involvement of arachidonic acid

It has previously been shown that the endocannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) inhibit the proliferation of C6 glioma cells in a manner that can be prevented by a combination of capsazepine (Caps) and cannabinoid (CB) receptor antagonists. It is not clear whether the effect of 2-AG is due to the compound itself, due to the rearrangement to form 1-arachidonoylglycerol (1-AG) or due to a metabolite. Here, it was found that the effects of 2-AG can be mimicked with 1-AG, both in terms of its potency and sensitivity to antagonism by Caps and CB receptor antagonists. In order to determine whether the effect of Caps could be ascribed to actions upon vanilloid receptors, the effect of a more selective vanilloid receptor antagonist, SB366791 was investigated. This compound inhibited capsaicin-induced Ca(2+) influx into rVR1-HEK293 cells with a pK(B) value of 6.8+/-0.3. The combination of SB366791 and CB receptor antagonists reduced the antiproliferative effect of 1-AG, confirming a vanilloid receptor component in its action. 1-AG, however, showed no direct effect on Ca(2+) influx into rVR1-HEK293 cells indicative of an indirect effect upon vanilloid receptors. Identification of the mechanism involved was hampered by a large inter-experimental variation in the sensitivity of the cells to the antiproliferative effects of 1-AG. A variation was also seen with anandamide, which was not a solubility issue, since its water soluble phosphate ester showed the same variability. In contrast, the sensitivity to methanandamide, which was not sensitive to antagonism by the combination of Caps and CB receptor antagonists, but has similar physicochemical properties to anandamide, did not vary between experiments. This variation greatly reduces the utility of these cells as a model system for the study of the antiproliferative effects of anandamide. Nevertheless, it was possible to conclude that the antiproliferative effects of anandamide were not solely mediated by either its hydrolysis to produce arachidonic acid or its CB receptor-mediated activation of phospholipase A(2) since palmitoyltrifluoromethyl ketone did not prevent the response to anandamide. The same result was seen with the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor palmitoylethylamide. Increasing intracellular arachidonic acid by administration of arachidonic acid methyl ester did not affect cell proliferation, and the modest antiproliferative effect of umbelliferyl arachidonate was not prevented by a combination of Caps and CB receptor antagonists.     

Cannabinoid receptor mediated inhibition of excitatory synaptic transmission in the rat hippocampal slice is developmentally regulated

The cannabinoid (CB) receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (500 nM) had no effect on the first of a pair of population spikes evoked in the CA1 region of hippocampal slices prepared from young adult (4 - 6 weeks old) rats, despite powerfully reducing paired-pulse depression. In contrast WIN55,212-2 caused a substantial depression of the single population spike (reduced to 43% control) and the field EPSP (reduced to 72% of control) recorded in slices prepared from neonatal (10 - 13 days old) rats. This effect was stereoselective and blocked by the CB(1) receptor antagonist AM281 (500 nM). The results indicate that activation of CB(1) receptors inhibits excitatory synaptic transmission in neonatal, but not adult rat hippocampus. This developmental regulation of CB(1) receptor mediated control of excitatory transmission may help explain some, but not all, of the previous discrepancies in the literature.     

Effects of the endogeneous cannabinoid, anandamide, on neuronal activity in rat hippocampal slices.

1. The arachidonic acid derivative arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide) is an endogeneous ligand of cannabinoid receptors that induces pharmacological actions similar to those of cannabinoids such as delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). We examined whether anandamide can influence excessive neuronal activity by investigating stimulation-induced population spikes and epileptiform activity in rat hippocampal slices. For this purpose, the effects of anandamide were compared with those of the synthetic cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 and its inactive S(-)-enantiomer WIN 55,212-3. 2. Both anandamide (1 and 10 microM) and WIN 55,212-2 (0.1 and 1 microM) decreased the amplitude of the postsynaptic population spike and the slope of the field excitatory postsynaptic potential (field e.p.s.p.) without affecting the presynaptic fibre spike of the afferents. At a concentration of 1 microM, WIN 55,212-2 completely suppressed the postsynaptic spike, whereas the S(-)-enantiomer WIN 55,212-3 produced only a slight depression. The CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716 blocked the inhibition evoked by the cannabinoids. SR 141716 had a slight facilitatory effect on neuronal excitability by itself. 3. Anandamide shifted the input-output curve of the postsynaptic spike and the field e.p.s.p. to the right and increased the magnitude of paired-pulse facilitation indicating a presynaptic mechanism of action. 4. Anandamide and WIN 55,212-2, but not WIN 55,212-3, attenuated both stimulus-triggered epileptiform activity in CA1 elicited by omission of Mg2+ and spontaneously occurring epileptiform activity in CA3 elicited by omission of Mg2+ and elevation of K+ to 8 mM. The antiepileptiform effect of these cannabinoids was blocked by SR 141716. 5. In conclusion, cannabinoid receptors of the CB1 type as well as their endogeneous ligand, anandamide, are involved in the control of neuronal excitability, thus reducing excitatory neurotransmission at a presynaptic site, a mechanism which might be involved in the prevention of excessive excitability leading to epileptiform activity.     

Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol-induced desensitization of cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of synaptic transmission between hippocampal neurons in culture

Prolonged exposure to cannabinoids results in desensitization of cannabinoid receptors. Here, we compared the desensitization produced by the partial agonist, Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to that produced by the full agonist Win55,212-2 on cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of glutamatergic synaptic transmission. Synaptic activity between rat hippocampal neurons was determined from network-driven increases in the intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca²⁺]_i spikes). To assess the effects of prolonged treatment, cultures were incubated with cannabinoids, washed in 0.5% fatty-acid-free bovine serum albumin to ensure the removal of the lipophilic drug and then tested for inhibition of [Ca²⁺]_i spiking by Win55,212-2. In control experiments, 0.1 μM Win55,212-2 inhibited [Ca²⁺]_i spiking by 93 ± 5%. Win55,212-2 produced significantly less inhibition of [Ca²⁺]_i spiking following 18–24 h treatment with 1 μM THC (48 ± 5%) or treatment with 1 μM Win55,212-2 (29 ± 6%). Thus, THC produced significantly less functional desensitization than Win55,212-2. The desensitization produced by THC was maximal at 0.3 μM, remained stable between 1 and 7 days of preincubation and shifted the EC₅₀ of acute inhibition by Win55,212-2 from 27 to 251 nM. Differences in the long-term effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on synaptic transmission may prove important for evaluating their therapeutic and abuse potential.     

Evaluation of the role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes and cannabinoid system in the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats

Male Wistar rats were trained to discriminate (−)-nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) from saline under a two-lever, fixed-ratio 10 schedule of water reinforcement. During test sessions the following drugs were coadministered with saline (substitution studies) or nicotine (0.025–0.4 mg/kg; combination studies): the ₄β₂ nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE), the non-selective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist mecamylamine, the ₇ nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA), the ₄β₂ nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype agonist 5-iodo-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine (5-IA), the cannabinoid CB₁ receptor antagonist/partial agonist rimonabant, the cannabinoid CB₂ receptor antagonist N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo-[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl]5-(4-chloro-3-methyl-phenyl)-1-(4-methybenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR 144528), the cannabinoid CB_1/2 receptor agonists (−)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxy-propyl)cyclohexanol (CP 55,940) or R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]-pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)-methanone mesylate (WIN 55,212-2), the endogenous cannabinoid agonist and non-competitive ₇ nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist anandamide, the anandamide uptake and fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetraenamide (AM-404), the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor cyclohexylcarbamic acid 3′-carbamoyl-biphenyl-3-yl ester (URB 597), AM-404 + anandamide or URB 597 + anandamide. 5-IA (0.01 mg/kg) fully substituted for nicotine, while other drugs were inactive. In combination studies, DHβE and mecamylamine dose-dependently attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and the full substitution of 5-IA, while MLA, rimonabant, SR 144528, CP 55,940, WIN 55,212-2, and URB 597 did not alter the nicotine cue. Pretreatment with AM-404 + anandamide or URB 597 + anandamide weakly enhanced nicotine-lever responding. Our pharmacological analyses demonstrates that the expression of nicotine discrimination is under the control of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes composed of ₄β₂ (but not of ₇) subunits. Furthermore, we excluded the involvement of either cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptors or increases in the endocannabinoid tone in the nicotine discrimination.     

Pharmacological separation of cannabinoid sensitive receptors on hippocampal excitatory and inhibitory fibers

Our earlier studies demonstrated that in the hippocampus, cannabinoids suppress inhibitory synaptic transmission via CB(1) cannabinoid receptors, whereas a novel cannabinoid-sensitive receptor modulates excitatory synapses (Katona, I. et al., Journal of Neuroscience 19 (1999) 4544; Hájos, N. et al., European Journal of Neuroscience 12 (2000) 3239; Hájos, N. et al., Neuroscience 106 (2001) 1). The novel receptor does not correspond to CB(2), since this receptor type is not expressed in the brain (Munro, S. et al., Nature 365 (1993) 61). Recent binding experiments revealed that the synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 binds with lower affinity to brain membranes of CB(1) receptor-knockout mice indicating that pharmacological differences exist between these two types of cannabinoid receptors in the hippocampus (Breivogel et al., Molecular Pharmacology 60 (2001) 155). To analyze this difference in detail, we first determined the EC(50) values of WIN 55,212-2 for excitatory and inhibitory transmission in rat hippocampal slices using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. The estimated EC(50) value for inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSC) evoked by electrical stimulation in CA1 pyramidal cells was 0.24 microM, whereas for excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSC) it was 2.01 microM, respectively. The cannabinoid antagonist, AM251, blocked the WIN 55,212-2-induced inhibition of evoked IPSCs, but not of EPSCs, providing evidence for its selectivity for CB(1). We then tested the hypothesis of whether the cannabinoid effect on hippocampal excitatory neurotransmission is mediated via receptors with an affinity for vanilloid ligands. Co-application of the vanilloid receptor antagonist capsazepine (10 microM) with cannabinoids (WIN55,212-2 or CP55,940) prevented the reduction of EPSCs, but not of IPSCs. The amplitude of evoked EPSCs was also suppressed by superfusion of the vanilloid receptor agonist capsaicin (10 microM), an effect which could also be antagonized by capsazepine. In contrast, capsaicin did not change the amplitude of evoked IPSCs.These results demonstrate that WIN 55,212-2 is an order of magnitude more potent in reducing GABAergic currents via CB(1) than in inhibiting glutamatergic transmission via the new CB receptor. The sensitivity of the new CB receptor (and EPSCs) to vanilloid ligands, but not to the cannabinoid antagonist AM251, represents another pharmacological tool to distinguish the two receptors, since CB(1) (and its effect on IPSCs) is not modulated by vanilloids, but is antagonized by AM251.     

Arachidonic acid release and prostaglandin F(2alpha) formation induced by anandamide and capsaicin in PC12 cells

Anandamide, an endogenous agonist of cannabinoid receptors, activates various signal transduction pathways. Anandamide also activates vanilloid VR(1) receptor, which was a nonselective cation channel with high Ca(2+) permeability and had sensitivity to capsaicin, a pungent principle in hot pepper. The effects of anandamide and capsaicin on arachidonic acid metabolism in neuronal cells have not been well established. We examined the effects of anandamide and capsaicin on arachidonic acid release in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells. Both agents stimulated [3H]arachidonic acid release in a concentration-dependent manner from the prelabeled PC12 cells even in the absence of extracellular CaCl(2). The effect of anandamide was neither mimicked by an agonist nor inhibited by an antagonist for cannabinoid receptors. The effects of anandamide and capsaicin were inhibited by phospholipase A(2) inhibitors, but not by an antagonist for vanilloid VR(1) receptor. In PC12 cells preincubated with anandamide or capsaicin, [3H]arachidonic acid release was marked and both agents were no more effective. Co-addition of anandamide or capsaicin synergistically enhanced [3H]arachidonic acid release by mastoparan in the absence of CaCl(2). Anandamide stimulated prostaglandin F(2alpha) formation. These findings suggest that anandamide and capsaicin stimulated arachidonic acid metabolism in cannabinoid receptors- and vanilloid VR(1) receptor-independent manner in PC12 cells. The possible mechanisms are also discussed.     

Anandamide and methanandamide induce both vanilloid VR1- and cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated changes in heart rate and blood pressure in anaesthetized rats

In anaesthetized rats activation of vanilloid receptors on sensory vagal nerves elicits rapid bradycardia and hypotension (Bezold-Jarisch reflex). Recent in vitro experiments revealed that the endogenous cannabinoid ligand anandamide acts as an agonist at the vanilloid VRI receptors. The present study was aimed at examining whether vanilloid VR1 receptors are involved in the cardiovascular effects of anandamide in the anaesthetized rat. Intravenous injection of anandamide, its stable analogue methanandamide and the vanilloid receptor agonist capsaicin produced a dose-dependent immediate and short-lasting decrease in heart rate and blood pressure with the following rank order of potencies: capsaicin > methanandamide > anandamide. This bradycardia was dose-dependently diminished by the selective vanilloid receptor antagonist capsazepine (0.3-3 micromol/kg) and the nonselective inhibitor of these receptors, ruthenium red (1-10 micromol/kg). Both antagonists reduced or tended to reduce the hypotension stimulated by the agonists. Following this bradycardia and hypotension (presumably evoked by the Bezold-Jarisch reflex; phase I), capsaicin, anandamide and methanandamide led to a brief vasopressor effect (phase II). Subsequently both anandamides, but not capsaicin, induced a more prolonged decrease in blood pressure (phase III). Capsazepine and ruthenium red (at doses up to 3 tmol/kg and 10 micromol/kg, respectively) failed to affect these changes in blood pressure. The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716 at 3 micromol/kg abolished the prolonged decrease in blood pressure (phase III) induced by anandamide and methanandamide, but had no effect on the reflex bradycardia and hypotension (phase I) and on the subsequent vasopressor effect (phase II) evoked by capsaicin, anandamide and methanandamide. In conclusion, the endogenous cannabinoid receptor agonist anandamide and its stable analogue methanandamide induce reflex bradycardia and hypotension (phase I) by activating the vanilloid VRI receptor. Whereas the mechanism underlying the brief vasopressor effect (phase II) is unknown, the prolonged hypotension (phase III) results from stimulation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor.     

Evidence for a modulatory role of cannabinoids on the excitatory NANC neurotransmission in mouse colon.

It is well accepted that endogenous cannabinoids and CB1 receptors are involved in the regulation of smooth muscle contractility and intestinal motility, through a mechanism mainly related to reduction of acetylcholine release from cholinergic nerve endings. Because, few data exist on a possible modulatory action of the cannabinoid agents on the non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of cannabinoid drugs on the NANC responses elicited by electrical field stimulation (EFS) in the circular muscle of mouse proximal colon. Colonic contractions were monitored as changes in endoluminal pressure. In NANC conditions, EFS evoked TTX-sensitive responses, characterized by a relaxation, nitrergic in origin, followed by a contraction. The EFS-evoked contraction was significantly reduced by SR48968, NK2 receptor antagonist, and abolished by co-administration of SR48968 and SR140333, NK1 receptor antagonist, suggesting that it was due to release of tachykinins. The cannabinoid receptor synthetic agonist, WIN55,212-2, the putative endogenous ligand, anandamide, the selective CB1 receptor agonist ACEA, but not the selective CB2 receptor agonist JWH-015, produced a concentration-dependent reduction of the NANC contractile responses, without affecting the NANC relaxation. ACEA or anandamide did not modify the contractions induced by exogenous [beta-Ala(8)]-NKA(4-10), agonist of NK2 receptors. The selective antagonist of CB1 receptors, SR141716A, per se failed to affect the EFS-evoked responses, but antagonized the inhibitory effects of WIN55,212-2, anandamide and ACEA on NANC contractile responses. AM630, CB2 receptor antagonist, did not modify the inhibitory effects of WIN55,212-2 or anandamide. URB597, inhibitor of the fatty acid amide hydrolase, enzyme which catalyze the hydrolysis of anandamide, was without any effect on the NANC evoked responses. We conclude that the activation of prejunctional CB1 receptors produces inhibition of NANC contractile responses in mouse colonic preparations. However, endogenous ligands do not seem to modulate tonically the NANC transmission in mouse colon.     

Hypolocomotor effects in rats of capsaicin and two long chain capsaicin homologues

Capsaicin and its analogue N-arachidonoyl-vanillyl-amine (arvanil) are agonists of vanilloid VR₁ receptors, and suppress spontaneous activity in mice through an unknown mechanism. Here, we tested in rats the effect on motor behavior of: (1) capsaicin; (2) N-linoleoyl-vanillyl-amine (livanil) and N--linolenoyl-vanillyl-amine (linvanil), which, unlike arvanil, have very little affinity for cannabinoid CB₁ receptors; and (3) the endocannabinoid anandamide (N-arachidonoyl-ethanolamine), which is a full agonist at both cannabinoid CB₁ and vanilloid VR₁ receptors. All compounds, administered i.p., dose-dependently (0.1–10 mg/kg) inhibited ambulation and stereotypic behavior and increased inactivity in the open field test. The rank of potency observed in vivo (livanil>capsaicin>linvanil>anandamide) bore little resemblance with the relative potencies in a functional assay for rat vanilloid VR₁ receptors (livanil=linvanil>capsaicin>anandamide) and even less with the relative affinities in rat CB₁ receptor binding assays (anandamide>livanil>linvanil>capsaicin). The vanilloid VR₁ receptor antagonist capsazepine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) blocked the effect of capsaicin but not of livanil or anandamide, whereas the CB₁ receptor antagonist (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide.HCl (SR141716A, 3 mg/kg, i.p.) antagonized the actions of the CB₁ receptor agonist Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol, but not of livanil, anandamide or capsaicin. Anandamide occluded the effects of livanil on locomotion, possibly suggestive of a common mechanism of action for the two compounds. Finally, stimulation with capsaicin of cells expressing rat vanilloid VR₁ receptors led to anandamide formation. These data suggest that motor behavior can be suppressed by the activation of: (1) vanilloid receptors, possibly via the intermediacy of anandamide; or (2) capsazepine- and SR141716A-insensitive sites of action for anandamide, livanil and linvanil, possibly the same that were previously suggested to mediate arvanil hypokinetic effects in mice.     

Vasorelaxant effect of Win 55,212-2 in rat aorta: new mechanisms involved

R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(moroholinyl)methyl] pyrrolo [1,2,3-de]-1,4benzoxazinyl]-1(1-naphthalenyl) methanone mesylate (Win 55,212-2) is a synthetic cannabinoid classically classified as a potent CB(1) and CB(2) agonist with high stereoselectivity and a slight preference for CB(2) cannabinoid receptors. Its vascular actions are not always explained by its binding to these cannabinoid receptors and new targets are being proposed. The aim of this study was to further assess the vascular actions of Win 55,212-2. Isometric tension changes in response to a cumulative concentration-response curve of Win 55,212-2 (10(-9) M-10(-4) M) were recorded in aortic rings from male Wistar rats. The involvement of the endothelium, cannabinoid receptors, vanilloid receptors, and the release of calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) was tested. Win 55,212-2 caused a concentration-dependent vasorelaxation in rat aorta. This vascular effect was significantly inhibited by endothelial denudation, inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis, a CB(1) receptor antagonist, a transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 antagonist, capsaicin desensibilization, and a CGRP receptor antagonist (P<0.001). CB(2) and non-CB(1)/non-CB(2) receptor antagonists only caused a slight inhibitory effect in vasorelaxation to Win 55,212-2. The present findings indicate that endothelium and nitric oxide-dependent vasorelaxation induced by Win 55,212-2 mainly involves vanilloid receptors while CB(1), CB(2) and nonCB(1)/nonCB(2) cannabinoid receptors have a minor participation in its vascular effect.     

The cannabinoid receptor agonists,anandamide and WIN 55,212-2, do not directly affect mu opioid receptors expressed in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Xenopus</Emphasis> oocytes

A functional link between the cannabinoid and opioid receptor pathways has been proposed based on data showing that cannabinoid effects can be blocked by opioid receptor antagonists and that cannabinoids can bind to opioid receptors. To explore this link in more detail at the receptor level, we tested the hypothesis that cannabinoids directly activate or modulate mu opioid receptor function. The G-protein coupled mu opioid receptor, MOR-1, and its effector, the G-protein activated potassium channel, GIRK2 (Kir3.2), were expressed together in Xenopus oocytes and potassium currents measured using the two-electrode voltage clamp technique. The specific mu receptor agonist DAMGO activated potassium currents in oocytes expressing the mu receptor that were fully inhibited by the mu receptor antagonist, naloxone. The endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide, and the synthetic cannabinoid, WIN 55,212-2, had no direct effects on potassium currents in the oocytes expressing the mu receptor. The cannabinoids also had no effect on the magnitude of the potassium currents activated by DAMGO or on the desensitization kinetics of MOR-1 in the continued presence of DAMGO. Both WIN 55,212-2 and anandamide activated cannabinoid CB1 receptors when co-expressed with GIRK2 in the oocytes. We conclude that neither anandamide nor WIN 55,212-2 directly activate or modulate mu opioid receptor function in oocytes and that interactions of cannabinoids with mu opioid receptors are likely to be indirect.     

Characterization of the anandamide induced depolarization of guinea-pig isolated vagus nerve

1. There is considerable interest in elucidating potential endogenously derived agonists of the vanilloid receptor and the role of anandamide in this regard has received considerable attention. In the present study, we have used an electrophysiological technique to investigate the mechanism of activation of vanilloid receptors in an isolated vagal preparation. 2. Both capsaicin and anandamide depolarized de-sheathed whole vagal nerve preparations that was antagonized by the VR1 antagonist, capsazepine (P<0.05) whilst this response was unaltered by the cannabinoid (CB1) selective antagonist SR141716A or the CB2 selective antagonist, SR144528, thereby ruling out a role for cannabinoid receptors in this response. 3. The PKC activator, phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) augmented depolarization to both anandamide and capsaicin and this response was significantly inhibited with the PKC inhibitor, bisindolylmaleimide (BIM) (P<0.05). 4. The role of lipoxygenase products in the depolarization to anandamide was investigated in the presence of the lipoxygenase inhibitor, 5,8,11-Eicosatriynoic acid (ETI). Depolarization to anandamide and arachidonic acid was significantly inhibited in the presence of ET1 (P<0.05). However, in the absence of calcium depolarization to anandamide was not inhibited by ETI. 5. Using confocal microscopy we have demonstrated the presence of vanilloid receptors on both neuropeptide containing nerves and nerves that did not stain for sensory neuropeptides. 6. These results demonstrate that anandamide evokes depolarization of guinea-pig vagus nerve, following activation of vanilloid receptors, a component of which involves the generation of lipoxygenase products. Furthermore, these receptors are distributed in both neuropeptide and non-neuropeptide containing nerves.     

R+-methanandamide inhibits tracheal response to endogenously released acetylcholine via capsazepine-sensitive receptors

The effects of cannabinoid drugs on the cholinergic response evoked by electrical field stimulation (0.2 ms pulse width, 20 V amplitude, 10 Hz, 7.5 s train duration) in guinea-pig tracheal preparations were investigated. The stable analogue of the endocannabinoid anandamide, R(+)-methanandamide (10(-7)-10(-4) M), produced a dose-dependent inhibition (up to 27+/-5% of control) of electrical field stimulation-mediated atropine-sensitive response. This effect was not blocked by the selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3 carboxamide hydrochloride (SR 141716A; 10(-6) M), and was not reproduced with the cannabinoid CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo [1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate) (WIN 55,212-2; 10(-8)-10(-5) M) or the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor selective agonist 1-propyl-2-methyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH-015; 10(-8)-10(-5) M); it was, on the contrary, antagonized by the vanilloid antagonist 2-[2-(4-chlorophenyl)ethyl-amino-thiocarbonyl]-7,8-dihydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-2 benzazepine (capsazepine; 10(-6) M). At the postjunctional level, neither R(+)-methanandamide nor WIN 55,212-2 nor JWH-015 did affect tracheal contractions induced by exogenous acetylcholine (10(-6) M). An inhibitory vanilloid receptor-mediated effect on the cholinergic response evoked by electrical stimulation was confirmed with the vanilloid agonist capsaicin, at doses (3-6 x 10(-8) M) which poorly influenced the basal smooth muscle tone of trachea. In conclusion, our data indicate that in guinea-pig trachea (a) neither CB(1) nor CB(2) cannabinoid receptor-mediated modulation of acetylcholine release occurs; (b) vanilloid VR1-like receptors appear involved in R(+)-methanandamide inhibitory activity on the cholinergic response to electrical field stimulation.     

Effect of anandamide on nonadrenergic noncholinergic-mediated relaxation of rat corpus cavernosum

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide on the nonadrenergic noncholinergic (NANC) relaxant responses to electrical field stimulation in isolated rat corpus cavernosum. The corporal strips were mounted under tension in a standard oxygenated organ bath with guanethidine sulfate (5 microM) and atropine (1 microM) (to produce adrenergic and cholinergic blockade). The strips were precontracted with phenylephrine hydrochloride (7.5 microM) and electrical field stimulation was applied at different frequencies to obtain NANC-mediated relaxation. The expression of CB1, CB2 and vanilloid receptor proteins within the rat corpus cavernosum was evaluated using western blot analysis. The results showed that the relaxant responses to electrical stimulation were significantly enhanced in the presence of anandamide at 1 and 3 microM. The potentiating effect of anandamide (1 microM) on relaxation responses was significantly attenuated by either the selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM251; 1 microM) or the vanilloid receptor antagonist capsazepine (3 microM), but not by the selective cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist 6-iodo-2-methyl-1-[2-(4-morpholinyl) ethyl]-1H-indol-3-yl (4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (AM630; 1 microM). Neither of these antagonists had influence on relaxation responses. Indomethacin (20 microM) had no effect on NANC-mediated relaxation in the presence or absence of anandamide (1 microM). Preincubation with Nw-Nitro-L-Arginine Methyl Ester (L-NAME; 1 microM) significantly inhibited the relaxation responses in the presence or absence of 1 microM anandamide. Although at 30 nM, L-NAME did not cause a significant inhibition of relaxant responses individually, it significantly inhibited the potentiating effect of anandamide (1 microM) on relaxation responses. Anandamide (1 microM) had no influence on concentration-dependent relaxant responses to sodium nitroprusside (10 nM-1 mM), a nitric oxide (NO) donor. The western blotting of corporal tissues demonstrated the existence of both vanilloid and CB1 receptors in corporal strips. In conclusion, our results showed that anandamide has a potentiating effect on NANC-mediated relaxation of rat corpus cavernosum through both CB1 and vanilloid receptors and the NO-mediated component of the NANC relaxant responses to electrical stimulation is involved in this enhancement.     

Possible mechanisms of cannabinoid-induced antinociception in the spinal cord.

Anandamide is an endogenous ligand at both the inhibitory cannabinoid CB(1) receptor and the excitatory vanilloid receptor 1 (VR1). The CB(1) receptor and vanilloid VR1 receptor are expressed in about 50% and 40% of dorsal root ganglion neurons, respectively. While all vanilloid VR1 receptor-expressing cells belong to the calcitonin gene-related peptide-containing and isolectin B4-binding sub-populations of nociceptive primary sensory neurons, about 80% of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor-expressing cells belong to those sub-populations. Furthermore, all vanilloid VR1 receptor-expressing cells co-express the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor. In agreement with these findings, neonatal capsaicin treatment that induces degeneration of capsaicin-sensitive, vanilloid VR1 receptor-expressing, thin, unmyelinated, nociceptive primary afferent fibres significantly reduced the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor immunostaining in the superficial spinal dorsal horn. Synthetic cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists, which do not have affinity at the vanilloid VR1 receptor, and low concentrations of anandamide both reduce the frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents and electrical stimulation-evoked or capsaicin-induced excitatory postsynaptic currents in substantia gelatinosa cells in the spinal cord without any effect on their amplitude. These effects are blocked by selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonists. Furthermore, the paired-pulse ratio is increased while the postsynaptic response of substantia gelatinosa neurons induced by alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxasole-propionic acid (AMPA) in the presence of tetrodotoxin is unchanged following cannabinoid CB(1) receptor activation. These results strongly suggest that the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor is expressed presynaptically and that the activation of these receptors by synthetic cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists or low concentration of anandamide results in inhibition of transmitter release from nociceptive primary sensory neurons. High concentrations of anandamide, on the other hand, increase the frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents recorded from substantia gelatinosa neurons. This increase is blocked by ruthenium red, suggesting that this effect is mediated through the vanilloid VR1 receptor. Thus, anandamide at high concentrations can activate the VR1 and produce an opposite, excitatory effect to its inhibitory action produced at low concentrations through cannabinoid CB(1) receptor activation. This "dual", concentration-dependent effect of anandamide could be an important presynaptic modulatory mechanism in the spinal nociceptive system.     

Contractile response to a cannabimimetic eicosanoid, 2-arachidonoylglycerol,of longitudinal smooth muscle from the guinea-pig distal colon in vitro

The effect of 2-arachidonoylglycerol, a cannabimimetic eicosanoid, was studied on mucosa-free longitudinal muscle strips isolated from the guinea-pig distal colon. In the presence of indomethacin (3 microM) and N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (100 microM), 2-arachidonoylglycerol (10 nM-10 microM) produced concentration-dependent and tetrodotoxin (1 microM)-sensitive contractions of the longitudinal muscle strips. The contractions were markedly attenuated in the presence of atropine (0.2 microM), and partially by hexamethonium (100 microM) pretreatment. The response to 2-arachidonoylglycerol was mimicked with N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide, 0.1-30 microM), another cannabimimetic eicosanoid, but the cannabinoid CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist, R-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3,-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone (WIN55,212-2) (0.1-10 microM), and the vanilloid receptor agonist, (all Z)-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenamide (AM 404) (10-30 microM), were without effect. The cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist, N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-l-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyrazole-caroxamide (SR141716A) (1 microM), the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist, [N-[1S]-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo [2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-l-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR144528) (1 microM), and the vanilloid receptor antagonist, capsazepine (10 microM), did not shift the concentration-response curve for 2-arachidonoylglycerol to the right. The contractile action of 2-arachidonoylglycerol was also partially attenuated in the presence of nordihydroguaiaretic acid (10 microM), a lipoxygenase inhibitor. These results indicate that 2-arachidonoylglycerol produces contraction of longitudinal muscle of the guinea-pig distal colon via mainly stimulation of myenteric cholinergic neurones, and that neither cannabinoid CB(1)/CB(2) receptors nor vanilloid receptors contributed to the response. The present results suggest the possibility that lipoxygenase metabolites may also contribute, at least in part, to the contractile action of 2-arachidonoylglycerol.     

CB<Subscript>1</Subscript>- and CB<Subscript>2</Subscript>-cannabinoid receptor-independent lipolysis induced by WIN 55,212-2 in male rat adipocytes

The expression of genes encoding the cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptors and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and the lipolytic activity of cannabinoid agonists were investigated in rat adipose tissue.RT-PCR studies indicated that the genes encoding CB₁ and CB₂ receptors and FAAH are not expressed in epididymal adipocytes. In functional studies, the non-selective cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 concentration-dependently (0.01–30 µM) induced glycerol release above baseline (E _max 96.1±6.2% of isoprenaline-induced lipolytic response). The selective CB₂ agonist JWH-015 (0.01–30 µM) had no lipolytic activity while the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol and the stable anandamide derivative, R(+)-methanandamide had, only a weak lipolytic effect at the highest concentrations employed (10 and 30 µM). The concentration/response relationship for WIN 55,212-2-mediated lipolytic activity, mimicked by the S(–)-enantiomer WIN 55,212-3, was shifted significantly to the right by the CB₁ antagonist AM 251 only at 10 µM, but was not modified by the -adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol (1 µM). The protein kinase inhibitor H-89, but not the two adenylyl cyclase inhibitors (±)N ⁶-R-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA, 1 µM, a selective A₁ adenosine receptor agonist) or SQ 22,536 (50 µM) significantly reduced the glycerol efflux induced by WIN 55,212-2.Our data suggest that the cannabinoid drug WIN 55,212-2 may exert lipolytic activity in male rat adipocytes via an intracellular mechanism, not activated by CB₁ or CB₂ receptor stimulation, significantly reversed by H-89 but not clearly linked to stimulation of adenylyl cyclase.     

Inhibitory effects of cannabinoid receptor ligands on electrically-evoked responses in rat isolated tracheal ring segments.

We have examined the possible existence of cannabinoid receptors in the isolated rat tracheal ring segments by studying the effects of some cannabinoid receptor ligands on electrically-induced contractions. Anandamide (10(-8)-3 x 10(-5)m), an endogenous ligand for cannabinoid receptors, and WIN 55,212-2 (10(-9)-3 x 10(-5)m), a moderately selective CB(2)agonist, inhibited electrically evoked contractions of the rat tracheal ring segments in a concentration-related manner. Addition of phentolamine (10(-6)m) to Krebs Henseleit solution to block alpha(2)-adrenoceptors did not affect anandamide-induced inhibition of the electrically evoked contractions. The EC(25)(-log m) values were 5.25+/-0.2 and 5.8+/-0. 4 for anandamide and WIN 55,212-2, respectively. The maximal inhibition produced by the highest concentration of the agonists used was 51.4+/-5.8% for anandamide and 35.1+/-19.5% for WIN 55, 212-2. WIN 55,212-3 also produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of the electrically evoked contractions. The maximal inhibition produced by WIN 55,212-3 was 15.8+/-2.4. The inhibitory effects of anandamide and WIN 55,212-2 were not attenuated by SR141716A (10(-6)m), a selective CB(1)receptor antagonist. Anandamide (10(-8)-3 x 10(-5)m) did not relax rat tracheal ring segments pre-contracted with carbachol (10(-6)m). These results suggest that anandamide and WIN 55,212-2 produce pre-junctional inhibitory effects in the rat trachea and that these effects were likely mediated through cannabinoid CB(2)receptors. These effects were probably non-cannabinoid receptor-mediated considering the high concentrations of the agents required to produce inhibitory responses and the effectiveness of WIN 55,212-3.     

Mechanisms of anandamide-induced vasorelaxation in rat isolated coronary arteries

1. The cannabinoid arachidonyl ethanolamide (anandamide) caused concentration-dependent relaxation of 5-HT-precontracted, myograph-mounted, segments of rat left anterior descending coronary artery. 2. This relaxation was endothelium-independent, unaffected by the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor, arachidonyl trifluoromethyl ketone (10 microM), and mimicked by the non-hydrolysable anandamide derivative, methanandamide. 3. Relaxations to anandamide were attenuated by the cannabinoid receptor antagonist, SR 141716A (3 microM), but unaffected by AM 251 (1 microM) and AM 630 (1 microM), more selective antagonists of cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors respectively. Palmitoylethanolamide, a selective CB(2) receptor agonist, did not relax precontracted coronary arteries. 4. Anandamide relaxations were not affected by inhibition of sensory nerve transmission with capsaicin (10 microM) or blockade of vanilloid VR1 receptors with capsazepine (5 microM). Nevertheless capsaicin relaxed coronary arteries in a concentration-dependent and capsazepine-sensitive manner, confirming functional sensory nerves were present. In contrast, capsazepine and capsaicin did inhibit anandamide relaxations in methoxamine-precontracted rat small mesenteric arteries. 5. Relaxations to anandamide were inhibited by TEA (1 mM) or iberiotoxin (50 nM), blockers of large conductance, Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels (BK(Ca)). Gap junction inhibition with 18alpha-glycyrrhetinic acid (100 microM) did not affect anandamide relaxations. 6. This study shows anandamide relaxes the rat coronary artery by a novel mechanism. Anandamide-induced relaxations do not involve the endothelium, degradation into active metabolites, or activation of cannabinoid CB(1) or CB(2) receptors, but may involve activation of BK(Ca). Vanilloid receptor activation also has no role in the effects of anandamide in coronary arteries, even though functional sensory nerves are present.