Bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of lisinopril tablets by in vitro comparative dissolution test and in vivo bioequivalence test

The bioequivalence of a test formulation (Nanopril, "test") and a reference formulation ("reference") of lisinopril (CAS 83915-83-7) was demonstrated by in vivo and in vitro tests. The in vivo bioequivalence study in 26 healthy volunteers was designed as a single dose, randomized, double-blind trial with a 2-week washout period between the doses. Prior to the in vivo study, an in vitro comparative dissolution test was performed by the paddle method following the bioequivalence guidance of the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). By the results of the dissolution test it was demonstrated from the similar and rapidly dissolving patterns of the two lisinopril tablets that the two formulations were pharmaceutically equivalent. However, the in vivo bioequivalence study was required to fully evaluate the bioequivalence of the two drug products. In the in vivo bioequivalence study, the plasma samples drawn from the volunteers were analyzed utilizing a sensitive LC-MS-MS analysis method and the bioequivalence between the two drug products was assessed by statistical analysis of the log transformed mean ratios of Cmax,AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity). The mean maximum concentration (Cmax) of the test and reference were found to be 60.41 +/- 20.07 ng/mL and 61.11 +/- 19.36 ng/mL, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (C.I.) of Cmax were in the range from 0.91 to 1.08. As for the AUC(0-t) and the AUC(0-infinity), test values were 792.73 +/- 273.41 ng x mL(-1) x h, 862.74 +/- 303.81 ng x mL(-1) x h and the reference values were 841.66 +/- 286.07 ng . mL(-1) x h, 906.97 +/- 318.72 ng x mL(-1) x h, respectively. The 90% C. I. of AUC(0-t) were 0.86 to 1.01 and of AUC(0-infinity), 0.87 to 1.02 and thus were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the FDA. In addition to the 90% C.I. of the pharmaceutical parameters, a two-way ANOVA showed no significant difference between the two formulations. Based upon these statistical analyses, it was concluded that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference.     

Bioequivalence of two oral formulations of triflusal capsules in healthy volunteers

Triflusal (CAS 322-79-2) is an antiplatelet agent related to salicylates used in several European and Latin American countries in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the bioequivalence of triflusal derived from two preparations using both parent drug and metabolite pharmacokinetic data. The bioavailabolity was measured in 24 healthy male Caucasian volunteers following a single oral dose (600 mg) of the test or reference products in the fasting state. Blood samples were collected for 120 h. Plasma concentrations of triflusal and its metabolite 3-hydroxy-4-trifluoromethylbenzoic acid (HTB) were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV and fluorescence detection, respectively. The non-compartmental method was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Log-transformed Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity were tested for bioequivalence using ANOVA and Schuirmann's two-one sided t-test. Tmax was analyzed by nonparametric pharmacokinetic parameters of triflusal and HTB derived from the two formulations were nearly consistent with previous observations. Triflusal parameters derived from the test and reference drug were as follows: Cmax (16.85 +/- 11.41 vs 14.48 +/- 7.22 mg/l), AUC0-t (18.43 +/- 10.91 vs 16.22 +/- 7.58 mg/l per hour), Tmax (1 range 0.25-2h vs 0.875 range 0.25-1.5 h), and t(1/2) (0.49 +/- 00.27 vs 0.76 +/- 0.64). HTB parameters after test and reference formulation administration were as follows: Cmax (68.13 +/- 23.05 vs 65.51 +/- 19.44 mg/l), AUC0-t (2748.18 +/- 971.91 vs 2877.97 +/- 881.2 h x mg/l), AUC0-infinity (3350.15 +/- 1182.62 vs 3372.49 +/- 1110.35 h x mg/l), Tmax (2 range 1-10 h vs 2 range 0.75-12 h), and t(1/2) (42.19 +/- 7.82 vs 43.13 +/- 6.56 h). 90% of confidence intervals for the test/reference ratio of Cmax AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity derived from both triflusal and HTB were found within the range of 80%-125% acceptable for bioequivalence. No significant difference was found between the Tmax values for triflusal and HTB. It was concluded that the two preparations are bioequivalent and may be prescribed interchangeably.     

Bioavailability and selected pharmacokinetic parameters of clindamycin hydrochloride after administration of a new 600 mg tablet formulation.

The study was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of clindamycin after administration of two oral clindamycin HCl formulations. A new tablet preparation containing 600 mg clindamycin (Clinda-saar 600, test) was compared to a marketed capsule containing 300 mg clindamycin (Sobelin 300, reference). Both preparations revealed comparable in vitro dissolution profiles with high batch conformity and homogeneity. Twenty healthy male volunteers received single doses of 600 mg clindamycin (test: 1 tablet, reference: 2 capsules) in an open, randomized, two-period crossover design. Blood samples were drawn up to 14 h p.a. and clindamycin plasma concentrations were measured using a sensitive and specific HPLC-UV method. Pharmacokinetic characteristics were similar for both preparations, arithmetic mean values (standard deviation) were computed as: AUC(0-infinity) 12.2 (4.2) and 13.1 (4.6) microg x h/ml, Cmax 3.1 (0.8) and 3.4 (0.8) microg/ml, t(max) 0.83 (0.24) and 0.85 (0.34) h, t(1/2) 2.3 (0.4) and 2.3 (0.6) h for test and reference, respectively. Mean relative bioavailability (point estimate) was 93% for AUC and 91% for Cmax. 90% confidence intervals for AUC and Cmax were within the predefined bioequivalence acceptance limits. Bioequivalence of test and reference preparations could be demonstrated. Single doses of 600 mg clindamycin orally were well tolerated without relevant differences between both preparations.     

Pharmacokinetics and comparative bioavailability of two terbinafine hydrochloride formulations after single-dose administration in Chinese healthy subjects

The bioavailability of a new terbinafine (CAS 91161-71-6) preparation was compared with a commercially available original preparation (reference) of the drug in 19 Chinese healthy male volunteers. The study was performed in an open, randomized, single blind two-sequence, two-period crossover design. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 250 mg terbinafine as a test or reference formulation with a 7-day washout period between the two preparations. The plasma concentrations of terbinafine were analyzed by a sensitive liquid chromatography-ultraviolet spectrometry method. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC(0-t) AUC(0-infinity), C(max), t1/2, and T(max). The values of AUC(0-t) demonstrated nearly identical bioavailability of terbinafine from the examined formulations. The AUC(0.48) of terbinafine was 5982.85 +/- 2449.17 and 6761.63 +/- 3140.33 ng x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of terbinafine was 1656.25 +/- 623.18 ng/ml for the test and 1552.07 +/- 660.35 ng/ml for the reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for C(max) and the area under the plasma concentration time curve for terbinafine. The 90% confidence limits calculated for C(max) and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) of terbinafine were within the bioequivalence range (80%-125% for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation of terbinafine.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of two digoxin formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese male volunteers

The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability/bioequivalence of two formulations of digoxin (CAS 20830-75-5) were assessed in this paper. The study was conducted in 20 healthy Chinese male volunteers according to an open, randomized, single-blind, 2-way crossover study design with a wash-out phase of 14 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 72 h post-dose and digoxin plasma concentrations were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS) method. Based on the plasma concentration-time data of each individual during two periods, pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity and t1/2, were calculated by applying noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic data for test and reference formulations were analyzed statistically to evaluate bioequivalence of the two formulations. After oral administration, the values of Cmax Tmax, t1/2, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity for test and reference formulations were 2.61 +/- 0.98 and 2.68 +/- 1.09 ng/ mL, 1.0 +/- 0.4 and 1.0 +/- 0.4 h, 27.94 +/- 3.14 and 27.56 +/- 3.86 h, 28.57 +/- 4.99 and 28.77 +/- 6.53 ng x h/mL, 33.44 +/- 4.85 and 33.63 +/- 7.57 ng x h/mL, respectively. Both primary target parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau, were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Relative bioavailabilities were 102.5 +/- 19.2% for AUC0-infinity, 102.0 +/- 19.3% for AUC0-tau. Bioequivalence between test and reference formulations was demonstrated for both parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau. The 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%, which means that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation of digoxin.     

Bioequivalence study of two oral formulations of cefadroxil in healthy volunteers

Two different cefadroxil (CAS 50370-12-2) formulations were evaluated for their relative bioavailability in 24 healthy volunteers who received a single 500 mg oral dose of each preparation. An open, randomized clinical trial designed as a two-period crossover study with a 7-day washout period between doses was employed. Plasma samples for assessments of their cefadroxil concentration by HPLC-UV were obtained over 8 h after administration. Values of 48.94 +/- 10.18 pg x h/ml for test, and 48.51 +/- 9.02 microg x h/ml for the reference preparation AUC(0-t) demonstrate a nearly identical extend of drug absorption. Maximum plasma concentration Cmax of 16.04 +/- 4.94 microg/ml and 16.01 + 4.02 microg/ml achieved for the test and reference preparations did not differ significantly. The parametric 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the mean of the difference (test-reference) between log-transformed values of the two formulations were 96.80% to 104.51% and 92.01% to 107.00% for AUC(0-t) and Cmax, respectively. Since for both AUC(0-t) or Cmax the 90% CI values are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, the test product is bioequivalent to the reference product for both the rate and extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of doxycycline capsules in healthy male subjects

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of doxycycline (CAS 564-25-0) from two different doxycycline hyclate (CAS 24390-14-5) capsules (Monodoks 100 mg capsule as test preparation and 100 mg capsule of the originator product as reference preparation) in 24 healthy male subjects. The study was conducted according to an open-label, randomised two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 16 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 72 h post-dose, and doxycycline plasma concentrations were determined with a validated HPLC method with UV-detection. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 1,715.1 ng/ml (test) and 1,613.3 ng/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of 28,586.5 ng x h/ml (test) and 29,047.5 ng x h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median tmax was 1.88 h (test) and 2.00 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t1/2) of 16.49 h (test) and 16.75 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 92.39 %-103.53% (AUC(0-infinity)) and 98.45%-111.74% (Cmax). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80 0%-125%.     

Comparative bioavailability study of two ibuprofen preparations after oral administration in healthy volunteers

The bioavailability of a new ibuprofen (2-(p-isobutylphenyl)propionic acid, CAS 15687-27-1) preparation was compared with a reference preparation of the drug in 23 healthy male volunteers, aged between 19 and 27. A single dose of 400 mg was given orally in the fasted state, using a randomized two-way crossover study. A washout period of two weeks separated both treatment periods. Ibuprofen plasma levels were determined by means of a validated HPLC method (UV detector). Values of 154.48 +/- 53.27 microg x h/ml (95 % confidence interval CI: 133.50-177.03) for the test, and 140.86 +/- 44.82 microg x h/ml (95% CI: 122.53-159.16) for the reference preparation AUC(0-infinity) demonstrate a nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum plasma concentrations Cmax of 39.53 +/- 7.11 microg/ml (95 % CI: 35.97-41.78) and 37.71 +/- 8.67 microg/ml (95% CI: 33.37-40.46) achieved for the test and reference preparations did not differ significantly. AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax ratios (90% CI) were within the 80-125% interval required for bioequivalence as stipulated in the current international regulations of the European Agency for the Evalution of Medicinal Products and the Food and Drug Administration. Therefore it is concluded that the new ibuprofen preparation is therapeutically equivalent to the reference preparation for both, the extent and the rate of absorption, after single dose administration in healthy volunteers.     

A simple high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of acyclovir in human plasma and application to a pharmacokinetic study

A rapid, simple and sensitive reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method has been developed for the measurement of acyclovir (CAS 59277-89-3) concentrations in human plasma and its use in bioavailability studies is evaluated. The method was linear in the concentration range of 0.05-4.0 microg/ml. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.05 microg/ml in 0.5 ml plasma sample. The intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations across three validation runs over the entire concentration range were less than 8.2%. This method was successfully applied for the evaluation of pharmacokinetic profiles of acyclovir capsule in 19 healthy volunteers. The main pharmacokinetic parameters obtained were: AUC(o-t) 6.50 +/- 1.47 and 7.13 +/- 1.44 microg x h/ml, AUC(0-infinity) 6.77 +/- 1.48 and 7.41 +/- 1.49 microg x h/ml, C(max) 2.27 +/- 0.57 and 2.27 +/- 0.62 microg/ml, t(1/2) 2.96 +/- 0.41 and 2.88 +/- 0.33 h, t(max) 0.8 +/- 0.3 and 1.0 +/- 0.5 h for test and reference formulations, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for C(max) and the area under the plasma concentration--time curve for acyclovir. 90% confidence limits calculated for C(max) and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) of acyclovir were included in the bioequivalence range (0.8-1.25 for AUC).     

Comparative bioavailability study of doxycycline hyclate (equivalent to 100 mg doxycycline) capsules (doxycin vs vibramycin) for bioequivalence evaluation in healthy adult volunteers

This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new capsule formulation of doxycycline (100 mg), doxycin, relative to the reference product, vibramycin (100 mg) capsules. The bioavailability was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single dose (100 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours on 2 treatment days. The treatment periods were separated by a 2-week washout period. A randomized, balanced 2-way cross-over design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 48 hours. Plasma concentrations of doxycycline were analyzed by a sensitive and validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for doxycycline were determined using standard noncompartmental methods. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, K(el), t(1/2) and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80-125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis of the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 95.98-109.56%, 92.21 to 107.66%, 93.90-112.56%, and 96.0 to 106.91% respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) by the Schuirmann's two 1-sided t-tests. Therefore, the 2 formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Bioequivalence study of two losartan formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new losartan preparation (2-butyl-4-chloro-1-[p-(o-1H-tetrazol-5-ylphenyl)benzyl]imidazole-5-methanol monopotassium salt, CAS 114798-26-4) was compared with the reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers, aged between 19 and 32. The open, randomized, single-blind two-sequence, two-period crossover study design was performed. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 100 mg losartan as a test or reference formulation. The plasma concentrations of losartan and its active metabolite were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-36h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. Values of AUC0-infinity demonstrate nearly identical bioavailability of losartan from the examined formulations. The AUC0-infinity of losartan was 2019.92+/-1002.90 and 2028.58+/-837.45 ng x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The AUC0-infinity of the metabolite was 10851.52+/-4438.66 and 11041.18 +/-5015.81 ng x h/ml for test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of losartan was 745.94+/-419.75 ng/ml for the test and 745.74+/-329.99 ng/ml for the reference product and the Cmax of the metabolite was 1805.77+/-765.39 and 1606.22 +/-977.22 ng/ml for the test and reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for both losartan and its active metabolite. 90 % confidence limits calculated for Cmax and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of losartan and its metabolite were included in the bioequivalence range (0.8-1.25 for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for losartan and its main active metabolite.     

Study on bioavailability difference between clopidogrel bisulfate form I and form II using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

The bioavailability of clopidogrel bisulfate (CAS 135046-48-9) form I was compared with that of clopidogrel bisulfate form II in 12 male Sprague-Dawley rats. The rats, randomly divided into two groups, received a single oral dose of 8 mg/kg clopidogrel (CP) bisulfate form I and form II, respectively, under fasting condition. The plasma concentrations of CP and its inactive carboxylic acid metabolite (CAS 144457-28-3, IM) were simultaneously determined by a sensitive, specific LC-MS/MS method. The pharmacokinetic parameters included C(max), T(max), t1/2, AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity). The AUC(0-infinity) of CP was 13.78 +/- 0.67 and 11.46 +/- 1.98 ng/ mL x h for CP form I and form II, respectively. The AUC(0-infinity) of IM was 33.08 +/- 5.76 and 21.67 +/- 8.95 microg/mL x h for CP form I and form II, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of CP was 3.81 +/- 0.54 ng/mL for CP form I and 3.18 +/- 0.31 ng/mL for CP form II, the C(max) of IM was 3.42 +/- 0.41 and 2.08 +/- 0.68 microg/ mL for the CP form I and form II, respectively. There was an obvious difference between form I and form II for C(max) and the area under the plasma concentration time curve for both CP and IM after a t-test. This study shows that CP form I has better bioavailability in rats than CP form II.     

Pharmacokinetics of huperzine A in dogs following single intravenous and oral administrations

The pharmacokinetics of huperzine A in dogs after single intravenous and oral administrations was investigated. Concentrations of huperzine A were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-compartmental methods. After single intravenous administration, the Cmax, T1/2, AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity, CL, Vd and Vss were 5.55 +/- 1.61 microg/L, 5.02 +/- 0.31 h, 16.04 +/- 5.24, 16.49 +/- 5.29 microgh/L, 0.66 +/- 0.19 L/h/kg, 4.76 +/- 1.46, and 3.93 +/- 1.54 L/kg, respectively. After single oral administration, the Cmax, Tmax, T1/2, AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity and oral bioavailability were 2.60 +/- 0.60 microg/L, 1.25 +/- 0.50 h, 5.71 +/- 2.25 h, 12.90 +/- 3.19, 13.78 +/- 3.24 microgh/L, and 94.4 +/- 36.5%, respectively. In conclusion, huperzine A had a rapid and nearly complete oral absorption and was extensively distributed into tissues after drug administration in dogs.     

LC-MS/MS法研究氢溴酸东莨菪碱口腔速崩微囊片在比格犬体内的药代动力学

研究氢溴酸东莨菪碱口腔速崩微囊片在比格犬体内的药代动力学和生物等效性。液相色谱分离采用C18柱(100 mm×3.0 mm,3.5μm),甲醇-2 mmol.L-1甲酸铵溶液(25∶75)为流动相;质谱检测采用ESI离子源,正离子MRM方式检测。将6只比格犬随机分成2组,分别单剂量灌服氢溴酸东莨菪碱口腔速崩微囊片(受试制剂)和氢溴酸东莨菪碱普通片(参比制剂)0.6 mg,定时采集血样,测定比格犬体内的血药浓度并计算药代动力学参数。受试制剂和参比制剂的Cmax分别为(8.16±0.67)、(3.54±0.64)ng.mL-1;t1/2分别为(2.83±0.45)、(3.85±0.82)h;tmax分别为(1.25±0.27)、(0.42±0.09)h;AUC0-12 h分别为(25.06±3.75)、(9.59±1.02)h.ng.mL-1;AUC0-∞分别为(26.30±3.92)、(10.80±1.45)h.ng.mL-1;MRT0-12 h分别为(3.38±0.34)、(3.86±0.26)h;MRT0-∞分别为(3.98±0.63)、(5.37±1.00)h。受试制剂和参比制剂在AUC和吸收速率方面具有...     

Comparative bioavailability study of two cefixime formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new cefixime ((6R,7R)-7-[(Z)-2-(2-amino-4-thiazolyl)-2-(carboxymethoxyimino) acetamido]-8-oxo-3-vinyl-5-thia-1-azabicyclo-[4,2,0]-oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid, CAS 79350-37-1) tablet preparation (Loprax) was compared with that of a reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers. The trial was designed as an open, randomized, single-blind, two-sequence, two-period crossover study. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 400 mg cefixime tablet as a test or reference formulation on 2 treatment days. The treatment periods were separated by a one-week washout period. The plasma concentrations of the drug were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-24h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. The mean AUC0-infinity of cefixime was 45008.7 +/- 10989.9 and 45221.3 +/- 2155.7 n x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of cefixime was on average 4746.9 +/- 1284 ng/ml for the test and 4726.3 +/- 1206.9 ng/ml for the reference product. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for test and reference tablets. The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis for the mean test/reference ratios of Cmax, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-24h of cefixime were in the bioequivalence range (94%-112%). Therefore, the two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Effect of a high-fat meal on thalidomide pharmacokinetics and the relative bioavailability of oral formulations in healthy men and women

The effect of food on the oral pharmacokinetics of thalidomide and the relative bioavailability of two oral thalidomide formulations were determined in an open label, single dose, randomized, three-way crossover study. Five male and eight female healthy volunteers received a single oral dose of 200 mg Celgene thalidomide capsules under fasted and non-fasted conditions, and a single dose of 200 mg tablets of Serral thalidomide under fasted conditions. The high-fat meal resulted in a 0.5-1.5 h absorption lag time, an increased mean C(max), a decreased mean AUC and a delay in mean T(max). The Serral tablet formulation resulted in a lower mean C(max), and slower terminal decline in plasma thalidomide concentrations compared with both Celgene treatments. Mean C(max) concentrations were 1.99+/-0.41 microg/mL (range 1.28-2.76) within 4.00+/-1.13 h (2-5) for the Celgene formulation fasted, 2.17+/-0.51 microg/mL (1.43-3.01) within 6.08+/-2.33 h (3-12) for the Celgene formulation with food, and 1. 05+/-0.31 microg/mL (0.62-1.65) within 6.23+/-1.88 h (5-10) for the Serral formulation fasted. Mean terminal half-lives were 13.50+/-6. 77 h for the Serral product, compared with 5.80+/-1.72 h and 5. 09+/-1.03 h for Celgene fasted and fed, respectively. Celgene's formulation exhibited slightly greater bioavailability than Serral's formulation, with mean ratios of 122% and 110% for Ln-transformed AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity), respectively. The mean C(max) for the Celgene formulation was approximately two times greater than Serral's. Food delayed the onset of absorption of by 0.5-1.5 h, but had little effect on the extent of absorption from the Celgene capsule. Under fasted conditions, the Celgene thalidomide resulted in a two-fold greater C(max) and 10% greater AUC(0-infinity) than the Serral formulation.     

Bioequivalence study of two brands of enalapril tablets after single oral administration to healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of 2 enalapril tablet formulations in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. METHODS: An open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-period, crossover trial with a 1-week washout period in 24 healthy volunteers. The 2 enalapril 20 mg tablet formulations used were Antiprex (Elpen, Greece) as test and Renitec (Vianex, Greece) as reference preparation. Serial blood samples were collected at 19 points for 36 h. Plasma samples were analyzed for enalaprilat, the pharmacologically active metabolite of enalapril, by a validated GC/MS assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters, such as AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-t), C(max) T(max), t1/2 and MRT were calculated from plasma concentrations for both formulations. Statistical comparisons (ANOVA and 90% confidence intervals) of AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-t) and C(max) data were evaluated after logarithmic transformation, and differences of T(max) were tested non-parametrically. RESULTS: The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean values of the test/reference ratios were 88.0 - 117.6% (point estimate: 101.8%) for AUC(0-infinity), 88.7 - 118.9% (point estimate: 102.7%) for AUC(0-t), and 91.0% - 123.4% (point estimate: 106.0%) for C(max) No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 preparations for T(max) t1/2 and MRT values. CONCLUSIONS: From the results of the present study, it is concluded that the test and reference tablet formulations of enalapril are bioequivalent for both the extent and the rate of absorption and therefore the 2 products can be considered to be interchangeable in clinical practice.     

Bioequivalence study of two amoxicillin formulations

A randomized single-dose crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy male volunteers to compare the bioavailability of two amoxicillin (CAS 26787-78-0) formulations, Glomox tablet (test) and a commercially available original preparation, amoxicillin capsule (reference). One thousand milligram of each formulation were administered after an overnight fast with a washout period of three days. Sixteen blood samples were collected over 10 h, amoxicillin concentrations in deproteinized serum were determined by a high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay, and pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by the standard non-compartmental method. Mean +/- SD maximum concentration (Cmax), time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax), area under the curve (AUC0-->t and AUC0-->infinity), and elimination half-life (t1/2) were 13.30 +/- 4.52 and 12.99 +/- 3.56 microg/ml, 1.92 +/- 0.76 and 2.02 +/- 0.62 h, 42.50 +/- 13.62 and 42.24 +/- 12.35 microg x h/ml, 46.31 +/- 13.23 and 46.08 +/- 12.14 microg x h/ml, and 1.54 +/- 0.39 and 1.48 +/- 0.48 h for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The parametric 90 % confidence intervals of the mean of the difference (test-reference) between log-transformed values of the two formulations were 92.61% to 109.50%, 92.83% to 109.12%, and 93.11% to 109.41% for AUC0-->t, AUC0-->infinity, and Cmax, respectively. The results indicate that the two formulations can be considered equivalent with regard to the rate and extent of absorption under fasting conditions.     

Bioavailability study of drotaverine from capsule and tablet preparations in healthy volunteers

The bioavailability of drotaverine (CAS 14009-24-6) was investigated after oral administration of a drotaverine capsule preparation (20 mg Droxa mite) and compared to that of a reference tablet preparation. The preparations were investigated in 23 healthy volunteers, aged between 20 and 27 years, according to a randomised two-way, cross-over design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of drotaverine plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 30 h following drug administration. A washout period of two weeks separated both treatment periods. Drotaverine plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated HPLC method (UV detector, imipramine HCl salt as an internal standard). The limit of detection was 6 ng/ml. Values of 1593.92 +/- 949.70 ng x h/l (95% confidence interval (CI): 1183.20-2004.60) for the test and 1705.48 +/- 737.78 ng x h/l (95% CI: 1386.40-2024.50) for the reference preparation AUC(0-infinity) demonstrate a nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum concentrations--Cmax of 121.89 +/- 37.03 ng/ml (95% CI: 104.05-139.80) and 121.85 +/- 37.97 ng/ml (95% CI: 107.09-135.74) and time to reach maximum plasma concentration--Tmax of 1.29 +/- 0.42 h (95% CI: 1.11-1.48) and 1.14 +/- 0.34 h (95% CI: 0.99-1.29) achieved for the test and reference preparations did not differ significantly. The relative bioavailability (AUC(0-infinity) ratio test/reference) and Cmax ratio test/reference were 103.15% (90% CI: 81.68-124.60) and 103.74% (90% CI: 94.10-113.38), respectively. AUC was calculated using two different methods. There were no significant differences between the obtained values. Since the 90% CI for both, AUC and Cmax ratios were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the European Agency for the Evalution of Medicinal Products (CPMP) and the Food and Drug Administration, it is concluded that the new drotaverine capsule formulation is therapeutically equivalent to the conventional formulation for both, the extent and the rate of absorption after single dose administration in healthy volunteers.     

Comparative bioavailability study of two preparations of letrozole in healthy subjects

The bioavailability of a new letrozole (CAS 112809-51-5) preparation was compared with the reference preparation of the drug in 25 healthy volunteers, aged between 18 and 33. A single dose of 2.5 mg was given orally in the fasted state, using a randomized two-way, cross-over protocol. A washout period of two weeks separated both treatment periods. Blood samples were obtained at regular time intervals, until 312 h after drug administration. After solid phase extraction (SPE) letrozole plasma levels were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography that was validated before the start of the study (UV detector, fluoroletrozole as an internal standard). The limit of quantification was 1.4 nmol/ml. The following pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated from letrozole plasma concentrations: AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-t), Cmax, tmax, F(rel), MRT, t(1/2), k(el). The confidence intervals for the statistical calculations of AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, tmax were 95 % and AUC(0-t), MRT, t(1/2), k(el) were tested by means of the unpaired t-tests procedure and after logarithmic transformation for overall significant differences using analysis of variance--three-way ANOVA. The AUC(0-infinity) ratio test/reference and the 90 % confidence interval were 99.52 %, and 94.05-107.31%, respectively. The Cmax ratio test/reference and the 90 % confidence interval were 89.18 %, and 84.48-98.60%, respectively. AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax ratios (90 % CI) were within the 80-125 % interval required for bioequivalence as stipulated in the current international regulations of the European Agency for the Evalution of Medicinal Products and the Food and Drug Administration. Therefore it is concluded that the new letrozole preparation is therapeutically equivalent to the reference preparation for both the extent and the rate of absorption after single dose administration in healthy volunteers.