Gastrointestinal stromal tumors – Summary of mutational status of the primary/secondary KIT/PDGFRA mutations,BRAF mutations and SDH defects

The most important findings revealing pathogenesis, molecular characteristics, genotyping and targeted therapy of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are activated oncogenic mutations in KIT and PDGFRA genes. Imatinib mesylate (IM), which inhibits both KIT and PDGFRA receptors, significantly improved treatment of advanced (metastatic, recurrent, and/or inoperable) GISTs. However, in a significant number of patients the treatment fails due to the primary or secondary resistance to targeted therapy. Most common cause of secondary resistance is a presence of secondary mutations. Approximately 15% of adult patients with GISTs are negative for mutations in KIT or PDGFRA genes. These so-called wild-type GISTs appear to be characterized by other oncogenetic drivers, including mutations in BRAF, RAS, NF1 genes, and subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) complex.In the present study we investigated 261 tumour specimens from 239 patients with GIST. Primary mutations were detected in 82 % tumor specimens. 66 of them were in KIT, and 16 % in PDGFRA genes. Remaining 18 % were KIT/PDGFRA wild-type. Secondary KIT mutations were detected in 10 from 133 (7 %) patients treated with IM. We examined secondary KIT mutations in exons 13 and 17 and secondary PDGFRA mutation in exon 18 in sixteen progressive tumors and/or metastasis (from overall 22 samples). We identified BRAF V600E point mutation in 4 % of KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GIST patients. Moreover, we analysed SDH complex mutations in 4 younger patients (15, 33, 37, and 45 years old) from 44 patients without KIT, PDGFRA, and BRAF mutations. Two patients (a 37-year old man, and a 33-year old woman) had defects of the SDH complex.Our findings of mutational status of the primary and secondary KIT/PDGFRA mutations in patients with GIST confirm mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance, and also intralesional and interlesional heterogeneity of secondary mutations within and between progressive lesions. Moreover, detection of V600E BRAF mutation and defects of SDH complex in KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs confirm their activation and allow for a selection of targeted therapy.     

Myxoid epithelioid gastrointestinal stromal tumor harboring an unreported PDGFRA mutation: report of a case and review of the literature

Activating mutations of platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) are detected in a significant proportion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), in addition to the more frequent mutation in c-kit. GISTs with PDGFRA mutations have been found to have several characteristic morphological features, sometimes allowing to discriminate them from GISTs with c-kit mutations. Among these, epithelioid morphology in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating mast cells are powerful predictors of PDGFRA mutations. Although myxoid stroma by itself is not so much a reliable predictor of PDGFRA mutation, myxoid stroma in conjunction with epithelioid morphology in tumor cells is a powerful predictor of mutations in this gene. GISTs showing either weak or negative immunoreactivity for c-kit and epithelioid cells with myxoid stroma are called myxoid epithelioid GISTs, which typically show PDGFRA mutation. Herein, we presented a case of a 59-year-old woman with myxoid epithelioid GIST of the stomach. A unique finding in this case was eosinophil infiltration, probably more numerous than mast cells; mast cell infiltration is known to be usually found in myxoid epithelioid GIST. The existence of a similar mechanism in eosinophil and mast cell recruitment via tumor-producing stem cell factor is speculated. Mutational analyses revealed a PDGFRA exon 18 mutation: D842_H845del, D846N. Combined deletion and substitution mutation has been reported in rare instances, but to the best of our knowledge, D846N has not been documented.     

Value of epithelioid morphology and PDGFRA immunostaining pattern for prediction of PDGFRA mutated genotype in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)

Aims: Genotyping is a prerequisite for tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in high risk and malignant GIST. About 10% of GISTs are wild-type for KIT but carry PDGFRA mutations. Applying the traditional approach, mutation analysis of these cases is associated with higher costs if all hotspots regions in KIT (exon 9, 11, 13, 17) are performed at first. Our aim was to evaluate the predictive value of a combined histomorphological-immunohistochemical pattern analysis of PDGFRA-mutated GISTs to efficiently direct KIT and PDGFRA mutation analysis. Methods: The histomorphology and PDGFRA immunostaining pattern was studied in a test cohort of 26 PDGFRA mutants. This was then validated on a cohort of 94 surgically resected GISTs with mutations in KIT (n=72), PDGFRA (n=15) or with wild-type status (n=7) on a tissue microarray. The histological subtype (spindled, epithelioid, mixed), PDGFRA staining pattern (paranuclear dot-like/Golgi, cytoplasmic and/or membranous), and extent of staining were determined without knowledge of the genotype. The combination of histomorphology and immunophenotype were used to classify tumors either as PDGFRA- or non-PDGFRA phenotype. Results: PDGFRA-mutated GISTs were significantly more often epithelioid (p<0.001) and had a higher PDGFRA expression, compared to KIT-mutants (p<0.001). Paranuclear PDGFRA immunostaining was almost exclusively observed in PDGFRA mutants (p<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of this combined histological-immunohistochemical approach to predict the PDGFRA-genotype was 100% and 99%, respectively (p=6x10^-16). Conclusion: A combination of histomorphology and PDGFRA immunostaining is a reliable predictor of PDGFRA genotype in GIST. This approach allows direct selection of the “gene/exons of relevance” to be analyzed and may help to reduce costs and work load and shorten processing time of GIST genotyping by mutation analysis.     

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in children and young adults: a clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 22 Korean cases

Studies on gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in young patients are limited due to their rarity, and none have been conducted in Asian populations. GISTs from patients under the age of 30 were retrospectively reviewed and were analyzed for clinicopathologic features, immunohistochemistry for SDHB (succinate dehydrogenase subunit B), and mutations for exon 9, 11, 13, and 17 of KIT gene and exon 12, 14, and 18 of PDGFRA gene. We found two pediatric (<18 years old) and 20 young adult (18–30 years old) GIST cases. Pediatric GISTs occurred in two girls, both as solitary masses with epithelioid histology in the stomach. Both GISTs were wild type for KIT and PDGFRA genes, were negative for SDHB, and there was no recurrence during follow‐up. Of the 20 GISTs in young adults, 12 (60%) were from extra‐gastric locations (six duodenum, five jejunum, and one esophagus), and 16 (80%) showed a spindle cell morphology. Mutations of KIT or PDGFRA genes were identified in 14 (78%) of the 18 cases. One patient with multiple gastric GISTs with perigastric lymph node metastases at presentation developed multiple distant metastases and died of the disease 7.3 years after diagnosis. Of the 19 R0‐resected young adult patients, one patient with small intestinal GIST harboring KIT exon 11 deletion mutation developed recurrence and showed partial responses for imatinib. In summary, compared with pediatric GIST cases, young adult GISTs are heterogeneous and share the characteristics of both pediatric and adult GISTs. When a mesenchymal tumor is clinically suspected in the small intestine of young adults, a GIST should be included in the differential diagnoses. Further mutation studies and extensive treatments are recommended for these cases.     

Comparative Ultrastructural Analysis and KIT/PDGFRA Genotype in 125 Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

GISTs are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the digestive tract and are thought to originate from or differentiate toward the interstitial cell of Cajal lineage. Almost all GISTs express KIT protein and the majority show activating mutations in either KIT or PDGFRA proto-oncogenes. Ultrastructurally, these tumors have been shown to have either a smooth muscle, neuronal, dual, or null phenotype. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between ultrastructural features and genotype in a large series of 125 histologically confirmed and CD117 positive GISTs. PCR analysis for the presence of KIT exon 9, 11, 13, and 17 and PDGFRA exon 12 and 18 mutations was performed. There were 62 (50%) tumors located in the stomach and 45 (36%) in the small bowel. Overall, KIT mutations were detected in 93 (75%) patients: 86 (69%) in exon 11, and 7 (6%) in exon 9. A PDGFRA mutation was detected in 7 (6%) cases and 25 (19%) cases had no mutation. Ultrastructurally, skeinoid fibers were seen in 55 (44%) cases and were more common in small bowel than stomach GISTs, and occurred in only in 1 of 16 patients with an ITD (KIT) exon 11 or PDGFRA mutation. Focal actin microfilaments were identified in 82 (65%) cases and did not correlate with location or mutation type. Rare neurosecretory-type granules (NS-G) were seen in 34 (27%) of cases, but were seen in most of the cells in only 5 (4%) cases. GISTs showing both NS-G and microtubules were associated with KIT exon 11 genotype and spindle cell morphology. PDGFRA mutated cases were associated with gastric location, predominantly epithelioid morphology and lacked NS-G.     

High density DNA array analysis reveals distinct genomic profiles in a subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) generally harbor activating mutations in KIT or platelet‐derived growth facter receptor (PDGFRA). Mutations in these receptor tyrosine kinases lead to dysregulation of downstream signaling pathways that contribute to GIST pathogenesis. GISTs with KIT or PDGFRA mutations also undergo secondary cytogenetic alterations that may indicate the involvement of additional genes important in tumor progression. Approximately 10–15% of adult and 85% of pediatric GISTs do not have mutations in KIT or in PDGFRA. Most mutant adult GISTs display large‐scale genomic alterations, but little is known about the mutation‐negative tumors. Using genome‐wide DNA arrays, we investigated genomic imbalances in a set of 31 GISTs, including 10 KIT/PDGFRA mutation‐negative tumors from nine adults and one pediatric case and 21 mutant tumors. Although all 21 mutant GISTs exhibited multiple copy number aberrations, notably losses, eight of the 10 KIT/PDGFRA mutation‐negative GISTs exhibited few or no genomic alterations. One KIT/PDGFRA mutation‐negative tumor exhibiting numerous genomic changes was found to harbor an alternate activating mutation, in the serine‐threonine kinase BRAF. The only other mutation‐negative GIST with significant chromosomal imbalances was a recurrent metastatic tumor found to harbor a homozygous deletion in chromosome arm 9p. Similar findings in several KIT‐mutant GISTs identified a minimal overlapping region of deletion of ～0.28 Mbp in 9p21.3 that includes only the CDKN2A/2B genes, which encode inhibitors of cell‐cycle kinases. These results suggest that GISTs without activating kinase mutations, whether pediatric or adult, generally exhibit a much lower level of cytogenetic progression than that observed in mutant GISTs. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

BRAF mutations in KIT/PDGFRA positive gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs): Is their frequency underestimated?

BRAF V600E mutations in GISTs are considered to be one of the mutational events in KIT/PDGFRA negative or positive GISTs, respectively. BRAF mutated GISTs usually do not respond to imatinib treatment, even more GISTs with imatinib sensitive KIT mutation. However, they are almost phenotypically and morphologically identical with KIT/PDGFRA positive GISTs. In general, due to the small number of BRAF mutations in GIST and because of the rarity of concomitant BRAF/KIT or BRAF/PDGFRA mutations, their frequency may be depreciated. The aim of this study was BRAF mutation detection in KIT/PDGFRA positive GISTs and their verification by other molecular methods. We applied the sensitive droplet digital PCR on 35 randomly selected KIT/PDGFRA positive GISTs to detect V600E mutations. We have established two criteria for the evaluation of samples: false positive rate (FPR) based on the negative controls; Limit of Detection (LoD) based on the serial dilution of positive control from RKO cell line harboring heterozygous V600E mutation in constant wild-type DNA background. Results from ddPCR were verified by other molecular methods: allele-specific PCR, dideoxysequencing, competitive allele-specific TaqMan PCR (castPCR). FPR was determined as 5 (∼4.4) positive droplets, and LoD was assessed to 3.4293 copies/μL what is the method sensitivity of 0.0162 %.We identified eight KIT/PDGFRA positive patients with concomitant V600E mutation. The five of them were in coexistence with KIT mutation and three with PDGFRA mutation. We also included the liver metastasis, but data from primary tumour were not available. We achieved the very high sensitivity of the ddPCR method for detecting BRAF mutation in GISTs to have importance from the point of view of therapy.     

KIT mutation in a naïve succinate dehydrogenase‐deficient gastric GIST

Up to 85% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) harbor mutually exclusive mutations in the KIT or the PDGFRA gene. Among others, known as wild type GIST, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)‐deficient tumors develop due to genetic or epigenetic alterations in any of four SDH genes. Herein, we present a unique case of SDH‐deficient GIST with an unusual heterogeneous SDHA and SDHB staining pattern and mutations detected in the SDHA and KIT gene. A 50‐year‐old patient presented with a 5 cm large gastric tumor with a multinodular/plexiform growth pattern, mixed epithelioid and spindle cell morphology, and focal pronounced nuclear atypia with hyperchromasia and high mitotic activity. Immunohistochemically, CD117 and DOG‐1 were positive. SDHB and SDHA stains showed loss of expression in some of the nodules, whereas others presented with an unusually weak patchy positivity. Molecular analysis revealed a point mutation in exon 5 of the SDHA gene and a mutation in exon 11 of the KIT gene. We hypothesize that based on the allele frequency of SDHA and KIT mutations the tumor is best regarded as SDH‐deficient GIST in which the SDHA mutation represents the most likely driver mutation. The identified KIT mutation raises the distinct possibility that the KIT mutation is a secondary event reflecting clonal evolution. This is the first case of a treatment naïve GIST harboring a somatic SDHA and a KIT mutation, challenging the dogma that oncogenic mutations in treatment naïve GIST are mutually exclusive.     

Mitotic recombination as evidence of alternative pathogenesis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1

Background

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a neurocutaneous disorder resulting in the growth of a variety of tumours, and is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumours that commonly harbour oncogenic mutations in KIT or PDGFRA and are thought to arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC; the pacemaker cells of the gut).

Aim

To characterise two patients with NF1 and GISTs.

Methods

Two patients were genotyped for germline mutations in NF1. GISTs from both patients were genotyped for somatic mutations in KIT and PDGFRA. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of NF1 in one GIST was assessed by genotyping seven microsatellite markers spanning 2.39 Mb of the NF1 locus in the tumour and in genomic DNA. The known germline mutation in NF1 was confirmed in GIST DNA by sequencing. The copy number of the mutated NF1 allele was determined by multiplex ligand‐dependent probe amplification.

Results

GISTs from both patients were of wild type for mutations in KIT and PDGFRA. In the GIST with adequate DNA, all seven markers were informative and showed LOH at the NF1 locus; sequencing of NF1 from that GIST showed no wild‐type sequence, suggesting that it was lost in the tumour. Multiplex ligand‐dependent probe amplification analysis showed that two copies of all NF1 exons were present.

Conclusions

This is the first evidence of mitotic recombination resulting in a reduction to homozygosity of a germline NF1 mutation in an NF1‐associated GIST. We hypothesise that the LOH of NF1 and lack of KIT and PDGFRA mutations are evidence of an alternative pathogenesis in NF1‐associated GISTs.     

High expression of the RNA-binding protein RBPMS2 in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and are often associated with KIT or PDGFRA gene mutations. GIST cells might arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) or from a mesenchymal precursor that is common to ICCs and smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Here, we analyzed the mRNA and protein expression of RNA-Binding Protein with Multiple Splicing-2 (RBPMS2), an early marker of gastrointestinal SMC precursors, in human GISTs (n = 23) by in situ hybridization, quantitative RT-PCR analysis and immunohistochemistry. The mean RBPMS2 mRNA level in GISTs was 42-fold higher than in control gastrointestinal samples (p < 0.001). RBPMS2 expression was not correlated with KIT and PDGFRA expression levels, but was higher in GISTs harboring KIT mutations than in tumors with wild type KIT and PDGFRA or in GISTs with PDGFRA mutations that were characterized by the lowest RBPMS2 levels. Moreover, RBPMS2 levels were 64-fold higher in GIST samples with high risk of aggressive behavior than in adult control gastrointestinal samples and 6.2-fold higher in high risk than in low risk GIST specimens. RBPMS2 protein level was high in 87% of the studied GISTs independently of their histological classification. Finally, by inhibiting the KIT signaling pathway in GIST882 cells, we show that RBPMS2 expression is independent of KIT activation. In conclusion, RBPMS2 is up-regulated in GISTs compared to normal adult gastrointestinal tissues, indicating that RBPMS2 might represent a new diagnostic marker for GISTs and a potential target for cancer therapy.     

Epithelioid variant of gastrointestinal stromal tumor harboring PDGFRA mutation and MLH1 gene alteration: A case report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most important and common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, especially in the stomach. GISTs are usually driven by activating mutations in either KIT or PDGFRA genes. It is known that activating gene mutations predicts, to a certain extent, not only the morphology of the tumor cells but also a response to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Here, we present a case of an epithelioid variant of GIST harboring PDGFRA and MLH1 gene alterations in the stomach of a 55‐year‐old Japanese woman. The tumor of 98 mm with multiple cysts showed exophytic growth from the gastric fundus. Histopathologically, it consisted of scattered medium‐sized epithelioid tumor cells in a loose myxoid background. Based on c‐kit and DOG‐1 immunoreactivity and a PDGFRA mutation (p.Trp559_Arg560del), the tumor was diagnosed as an epithelioid variant GIST. Interestingly, it had a gene alteration (p.Met524Ile) in the MLH1 gene of unknown pathogenicity. It was assigned to Group 3a (low risk for malignant behavior). After surgery, the patient has been on imatinib therapy and disease‐free for 10 months.     

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors with exon 8 c-kit gene mutation might occur at extragastric sites and have metastasis-prone nature

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the human gut. Most sporadic GISTs have somatic gain-of-function mutations of the c-kit gene. The mutations are frequently found at exon 11, sometimes at exon 9 and rarely at exon 13 or 17. Recently, exon 8 c-kit gene mutations were reported in very minor proportion of sporadic GISTs. We also found 3 GISTs with exon 8 c-kit gene mutations in approximately 1,000 sporadic GISTs examined. In the present report, we showed the clinicopathological data of those GISTs. One case had a deletion of codon 419 of aspartate, and 2 cases had a substitution of 3 amino acids of codon 417 to codon 419 to tyrosine. The former was the same mutation recently reported in 2 GIST cases, but the latter has not been reported in any GISTs. All three cases occurred at extragastric sites and two of three showed distant metastasis. Since the remaining case was regarded as high risk for recurrence, imatinib adjuvant treatment has been done without evidence of metastasis. Our results confirmed the idea that exon 8 mutations are minor but actually existing abnormalities in sporadic GISTs, and suggested that such GISTs have a feature of extragastric development and a metastasis-prone nature. Since the exon 8 mutations appeared to be really sensitive to imatinib as shown in the present case study, accurate genotyping including exon 8 of the c-kit gene is necessary in GISTs to predict response to imatinib in both the unresectable/metastatic and adjuvant settings.     

Novel oncogene and tumor suppressor mutations in KIT and PDGFRA wild type gastrointestinal stromal tumors revealed by next generation sequencing

Among gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of 10–15% are negative for KIT and PDGFRA, and most of these cases are SDH deficient. Recent studies have provided data on additional molecular alterations such as KRAS in KIT mutant GISTs. We aimed to assess the frequency and spectrum of somatic mutations in common oncogenes as well as copy number variations in GISTs negative for KIT and PDGFRA mutations. GISTs with wild type KIT/PDGFRA were tested via next generation sequencing for somatic mutations in 341 genes. SDHB immunohistochemistry to evaluate for SDH deficiency was also performed. Of 267 GISTs tested for KIT and PDGFRA mutations, 15 were wild type, of which eight cases had material available for further testing. All eight cases had loss of SDHB expression and had various molecular alterations involving ARID1A, TP53, and other genes. One case had a KRAS G12V (c.35G>T) mutation in both the primary gastric tumor and a post‐imatinib recurrence. This tumor had anaplastic features and was resistant to multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors, ultimately resulting in cancer‐related mortality within 2 years of diagnosis. In conclusion, KRAS mutations occur in rare GISTs with wild type KIT and PDGFRA. These tumors may display immunohistochemical positivity for KIT and primary resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Obesity related methylation changes in DNA of peripheral blood leukocytes

Background

Oncogenic point mutations in KIT or PDGFRA are recognized as the primary events responsible for the pathogenesis of most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but additional genomic alterations are frequent and presumably required for tumor progression. The relative contribution of such alterations for the biology and clinical behavior of GIST, however, remains elusive.

Methods

In the present study, somatic mutations in KIT and PDGFRA were evaluated by direct sequencing analysis in a consecutive series of 80 GIST patients. For a subset of 29 tumors, comparative genomic hybridization was additionally used to screen for chromosome copy number aberrations. Genotype and genomic findings were cross-tabulated and compared with available clinical and follow-up data.

Results

We report an overall mutation frequency of 87.5%, with 76.25% of the tumors showing alterations in KIT and 11.25% in PDGFRA. Secondary KIT mutations were additionally found in two of four samples obtained after imatinib treatment. Chromosomal imbalances were detected in 25 out of 29 tumors (86%), namely losses at 14q (88% of abnormal cases), 22q (44%), 1p (44%), and 15q (36%), and gains at 1q (16%) and 12q (20%). In addition to clinico-pathological high-risk groups, patients with KIT mutations, genomic complexity, genomic gains and deletions at either 1p or 22q showed a significantly shorter disease-free survival. Furthermore, genomic complexity was the best predictor of disease progression in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

In addition to KIT/PDGFRA mutational status, our findings indicate that secondary chromosomal changes contribute significantly to tumor development and progression of GIST and that genomic complexity carries independent prognostic value that complements clinico-pathological and genotype information.     

Loss of DOG-1 expression associated with shift from spindled to epithelioid morphology in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors with KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α mutations

Most gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) display spindle cell morphology and coexpress CD117 (KIT), DOG-1, and CD34. Secondary loss of DOG-1 has not been reported. We present two gastric GISTs which showed loss of DOG-1 in the epithelioid component but retained its expression in the minor spindle cell component. Patients were a 67-year-old man and an 80-year-old woman with 4.8-cm and 3.5-cm gastric GISTs harboring mutations in KIT exon 11 (c.1729_1758dup30; p.P577_R586dup) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) exon 18 (c.2527_2538del12; p.I843_D846del), respectively. Both were predominantly epithelioid with a minor microscopic spindle cell component (3-12 mm). The spindle cell component was CD117⁺CD34⁺DOG-1⁺ in both cases. The epithelioid component in case 1 was CD117⁺CD34⁺DOG-1^?. In case 2, the epithelioid component strongly expressed PDGFRA (dot-like) but lost CD117, CD34, and DOG-1. These cases confirm the immunophenotypic heterogeneity as secondary events in GIST. Loss of DOG-1 in KIT-negative PDGFRA mutants should not preclude diagnosis.     

Morphological features useful in the differential diagnosis between undifferentiated carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Undifferentiated (sarcomatoid) carcinomas may closely mimic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) due to possible histological and immunohistochemical overlap between these two entities. To avoid unnecessary employment of a wide spectrum of immunohistochemical stainings and molecular genetics and thus decrease costs, finding simple morphological features to target further investigation of such neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract would be helpful.Five cases classified as undifferentiated (sarcomatoid) carcinomas with a definite proof of the diagnosis, i. e. the presence of a differentiated carcinomatous component, were retrieved from archives of several institutions. For comparison, 84 cases of GIST mutated in KIT or PDGFRA genes served as the control group. Hematoxylin and eosin stained slides were evaluated for the presence of patterns which might discriminate between sarcomatoid carcinoma and GIST.Lymphatic invasion and entrapment of fat tissue strongly favor the diagnosis of undifferentiated carcinoma, as it was found in all or almost all cases of undifferentiated carcinoma, but in no GIST. Alternation of low- and high- grade areas, formation of angiosarcomatous-like spaces, and the presence of yolk sac-like areas were also detected in all cases of undifferentiated carcinoma, but only in 1.2%, 2.4% and 7.2% of the GISTs, respectively. Furthermore, DOG1 was negative in all cases of undifferentiated carcinoma.According to this study, the presence of the histological findings listed above should prompt extensive tumor sampling in order to find a differentiated carcinomatous component. However, due to the small number of cases of undifferentiated carcinoma available for the study, a larger multi-institutional study is warranted.     

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the digestive organs: a histopathologic study of 31 cases in a single Japanese institute

The author herein reports histopathologic features of 31 surgical cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the digestive organs. The 31 cases of GIST were diagnosed in our pathology laboratory. They consisted of 24 cases of gastric GIST, 1 case of hepatic GIST, 1 case of small intestinal GIST, 4 cases of colon GIST, and 1 case of rectal GIST. The age of the patients ranged from 56 year to 84 years with a mean of 71 years. Male to female ratio was 21:10. The presenting symptoms were gastrointestinal bleeding in 13 cases, abdominal pain and discomfort in 13 cases, and asymptomatic in 5 cases. Endoscopy and imaging modalities including US, CT and MRI were useful to detect the tumors in all cases, and biopsies confirmed the GIST diagnosis in 21 cases. The size of GIST ranged from 1 cm to 12 cm with a mean of 4.3 cm. Grossly, 23 cases were submucosal tumors, 6 serosa-side tumors, 1 solid tumor in the liver, and 1 rectal polyp. Histologically, 28 cases were of spindle cell type and 3 of epithelioid type. According to mitotic counts and tumor size, the malignant risk was very low in 4 cases, low in 14 cases, intermediate in 9 cases, and high in 4 cases. Immunohistochemically, all cases were positive for KIT and vimentin, 30 cases for CD34, and 4 cases for α-smooth muscle actin. None were positive for desmin and S100 protein. Ki-67 labeling ranged from 2% to 18%. P53 protein was negative in all cases. PDGFRA was positive in 20 cases among 24 cases examined. Genetic analysis using PCR-direct sequencing method was performed in 5 GISTs; all the 5 GISTs showed point mutations or deletions in KIT gene, but did not in PDGFRA gene. The 5 cases of GIST were positive for PDGFRA protein, suggesting that PDGFRA overexpression is not associated with PDGFRA gene mutations. Four of the 31 cases showed metastases. The chemotherapy was imatinib mesylate in 6 cases, and none in 25 cases. Four cases of high risk died of GIST, and 27 cases are alive now without tumors.     

Neurofibromatosis 1 Presenting with Multiple Duodenal Gists Associated with a Somatostatin-Producing D Cell Neoplasm

The co-existence of a duodenal somatostatin-producing D cell neoplasm and multiple duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) in a 61-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type 1 is reported. Histologically, the D cell neoplasm showed a glandular pattern with psammoma bodies and was metastatic to regional lymph nodes and liver at the time of surgery. Tumour cells were monomorph and showed intense and diffuse immunoreactivity for somatostatin, focal positivity for calcitonin, while were negative for other gastroenteropancreatic hormones including insulin, glucagon, pancreatic polypeptide, serotonin and gastrin. Four submucosal and subserosal GISTs, ranging from 5 to 15 mm in diameter, were composed of uniform spindle-shaped cells lacking mitoses and contained numerous skeinoid fibres. The tumours were positive for CD117, DOG1, vimentin and CD34 and did not have KIT or PDGFRA mutations. The clinical and pathological importance of this unusual association is discussed.