Tumour eosinophilia combined with an immunohistochemistry panel is useful in the differentiation of type B3 thymoma from thymic carcinoma

It is sometimes difficult to differentiate between type B3 thymoma from thymic carcinoma histologically. Given the rarity of these tumours, studies have been limited. A series of 66 thymic neoplasms were reviewed and classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) scheme. We performed a tissue microarray analysis of surgically resected thymic tumour specimens including 12 thymic carcinomas, 17 type B3 thymomas and 37 thymomas of other types. Percentage and staining intensity of immunohistochemical markers were recorded. Tumour eosinophilia was recorded positive if at least one eosinophilic cell identified. Positive staining of the following markers significantly differentiated type B3 thymoma from thymic carcinoma: cytokeratin 5/6 (15 vs. 3), Mesothelin (0 vs. 5), cytoplasmic androgen receptor (10 vs. 0), CD57 (9 vs. 0), CD5 (0 vs. 7), TdT (lymphocytic) (14 vs. 1), CD1a (lymphocytic) (14 vs. 2), CD117 (1 vs. 9), MOC31 (2 vs. 6), p21 (2 vs. 8), cytoplasmic Survivin (0 vs. 4), and tumour eosinophilia (1 vs. 11). Combining two or three markers was able to differentiate these two tumours with area under the curve percentage of at least 92%. Tumour eosinophilia combined with a panel of immunohistochemistry could differentiate type B3 thymoma from thymic carcinoma.     

Recurrent genetic aberrations in thymoma and thymic carcinoma

Apart from single reported aberrant karyotypes, genetic alterations in thymic epithelial neoplasms have not been investigated so far. In this study, 12 World Health Organization classification type A thymomas (medullary thymomas), 16 type B3 thymomas (well-differentiated thymic carcinomas), and nine type C thymomas, all of them primary thymic squamous cell carcinomas, were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization. With the exception of one single case, type A thymomas did not reveal chromosomal gains or losses in comparative genomic hybridization. In contrast, all type B3 thymomas showed chromosomal imbalances, with gain of 1q, loss of chromosome 6, and loss of 13q occurring in 11 (69%), six (38%), and five (31%) of 16 cases, respectively. In primary thymic squamous cell carcinoma, the most frequent chromosomal losses were observed for 16q (six of nine cases, 67%), 6 (4 of 9, 44%), and 3p and 17p (three of nine each, 33%), whereas recurrent gains of chromosomal material were gains of 1q (5 of 9, 56%), 17q, and 18 (three of nine each, 33%). This study shows that the distinct histological thymoma types A and B3 exhibit distinct genetic phenotypes, whereas type B3 thymoma and primary thymic squamous cell carcinoma partially share genetic aberrations. In addition to the possible tumorigenic role, the deletion in type B3 thymoma of chromosome 6, harboring the HLA locus, might play a role in the pathogenesis of paraneoplastic autoimmunity characteristic of thymoma.     

Thymoma with loss of keratin expression (and giant cells): a potential diagnostic pitfall

Due to its profound therapeutic consequences, the distinction between thymoma and T-lymphoblastic lymphoma in needle biopsies is one of the most challenging in mediastinal pathology. One essential diagnostic criterion favouring thymoma is the demonstration of increased numbers of keratin-positive epithelial cells by immunohistochemistry. Loss of keratin expression in neoplastic epithelial cells could lead to detrimental misdiagnoses. We here describe a series of 14 thymic epithelial tumours (11 type B2 and B3 thymomas, 3 thymic carcinomas) with loss of expression of one or more keratins. Cases were analysed for expression of various keratins and desmosomal proteins by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence and compared with 45 unselected type B thymomas and 24 thymic carcinomas arranged in a multitissue histological array. All 14 cases showed highly reduced expression of at least one keratin, three cases were completely negative for all keratins studied. Of the 14 cases, 13 showed strong nuclear expression of p63. Expression of desmosomal proteins was preserved, suggesting intact cell contact structures. Loss of expression of broad-spectrum-keratins and K19 was observed in 3 and 5 % of unselected thymomas and in 30 and 60 % of thymic carcinomas. A proportion of keratin-depleted thymomas contained giant cells, reminiscent of thymic nurse cells. Loss of keratin expression in type B2 and B3 thymomas is an important diagnostic pitfall in the differential diagnosis with T-lymphoblastic lymphoma and can be expected in 5 % of cases. A panel of epithelial markers including p63 is warranted to ensure correct diagnosis of keratin-negative mediastinal tumours.     

CD20在胸腺瘤中的表达及其临床病理意义

目的 探讨CD20在胸腺瘤中的表达及其临床和病理学意义.方法 对179例手术切除的胸腺肿瘤病例,按照2004年的WHO分类标准并结合临床病理资料,重新进行病理组织学分类,并选取其中资料完整的102例肿瘤组织,运用免疫组织化学EnVision法分别标记CD20、CKpan、末端脱氧核苷酸转移酶、CD3、CD5、CD43、CD99、S-100蛋白.其中重点观察肿瘤性上皮细胞及背景淋巴细胞的CD20表达特征,其他指标用以标记细胞.同时将所有病例按是否伴有重症肌无力分为两组,对结果进行统计学分析.结果 102例胸腺瘤中,A型7例、AB型32例、B1型17例、B2型15例、B3型17例,胸腺癌14例,CD20表达于肿瘤性上皮细胞,在A、AB、B1、B2、B3型胸腺瘤和胸腺癌中的阳性率分别为3/7、84.4%(27/32)、1/17、2/15、0/17、0/14.肿瘤的背景淋巴细胞的阳性率分别为3/7、18.8%(6/32)、14/17、11/15、11/17、6/14.伴重症肌无力组(40例)肿瘤内淋巴细胞的CD20阳性表达率为67.5%(22/40),不伴重症肌无力组(62例)阳性表达率为35.5%(22/62),CD20阳性的B淋巴细胞主要分布于伴重症肌无力组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 A型、AB型和极少数的B1、B2型胸腺瘤的上皮细胞均具有表达CD20蛋白的特征,这类上皮细胞属于肿瘤性上皮;而B3型胸腺瘤及胸腺癌的肿瘤性上皮细胞缺乏表达CD20蛋白的特征.胸腺瘤伴重症肌无力者,肿瘤内B淋巴细胞增生,数量明显多于不伴重症肌无力者.AB型胸腺瘤并非A型与B型胸腺瘤的单纯混合,可能属于不同的细胞起源而表现出不同的组织形态和免疫表型.     

Value of p63 and cytokeratin 5/6 as immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis of poorly differentiated and undifferentiated carcinomas.

To facilitate the differential diagnosis of poorly differentiated metastatic carcinomas of unknown primary site, we evaluated p63 and cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 as immunohistochemical markers for squamous cell carcinomas. The study cases were as follows: squamous cell carcinoma of the lungs, head/neck, esophagus, cervix uteri, or anal canal, 73; non-squamous cell carcinomas of various primary sites, 141; and urothelial carcinoma, 20. We also tested 14 malignant mesotheliomas. Immunoreactivity for p63 was as follows: squamous cell carcinomas, 59 (81%); urothelial carcinoma, 14 (70%), most often with diffuse staining patterns; non-squamous cell carcinomas, 20 (14.2%), resulting in a specificity of 0.86 of p63 for squamous cell carcinomas. Coexpression of p63 and CK5/6 had a sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity of 0.96 for squamous cell carcinomas. Increasing the minimal criterion of positive immunostaining for both markers to more than 50% of immunoreactive tumor cells resulted in a specificity of 0.99, although the sensitivity diminished to 0.66. All malignant mesotheliomas were negative for p63. Our data suggest that positive immunostaining for both p63 and CK5/6 in poorly differentiated metastatic carcinomas is highly predictive of a primary tumor of squamous epithelial origin.     

Adenoid squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity

Because immunohistochemical features of adenoid squamous cell carcinoma (AdSCC) of the oral cavity is unclear, the author reports herein AdSCC in the gingival with an emphasis on immunohistochemical features. A 73-year-old woman presented with a left lower gingival tumor. The tumor was mildly elevated tumor measuring 1.5 x 1.5 x 0.5 cm. Dentist's diagnosis was granulation tissue, and a biopsy was taken. The biopsy showed proliferation of carcinoma cells arranged in cords, and squamous and tubular differentiations were noted in places. The biopsy diagnosis was adenosquamous carcinoma. Tumor excision with resection of mandibular bone was performed. The resected tissue showed a mixture and squamous cell carcinoma and tubular formation. Gradual merges between the two and acantholytic features of the squamous cell carcinoma element were seen. Both components were free from mucins. Both components were positive for pancytokeratins (AE1/3, CAM5.2) +++, cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 +, CK34βE12 ++, CK7 +, CK14 +++, CEA +, CA19-9 +, CA125 +, p53 +++, p63 +++, KIT + and MUC1 ++. Both components were negative for CK8, CK18, CK19, CK20, EMA, vimentin, TTF-1, desmin, myoglobin, S100 protein, melanosome, smooth muscle actin, CD34, CDX2, CD10, chromogranin, synaptophysin, NSE, CD56, lysozyme, CD68, MDM2, PDGFRA, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6. Since both components were positive for squmaous cell carcinoma markers (CD5/6, CK34βE12, and p63) and adenocarcinoma markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA125, MUC1), this case of AdSCC appears an intermediate form between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. The margins were negative. No metastasis was found by imaging techniques. The patient is now free from tumor and is followed up carefully.     

Primary thymic epithelial tumours of the pleura mimicking malignant mesothelioma

AIMS: To illustrate the macroscopic, light microscopic and immunophenotypic similarities that exist between primary pleural thymic epithelial tumours and diffuse malignant mesothelioma. To investigate the expression of the mesothelial markers, cytokeratin (CK) 5/6, calretinin and thrombomodulin in a series of mediastinal thymic epithelial tumours. METHODS AND RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, 64 diffuse pleural tumours of non-mesothelial histogenesis were identified in the files of referrals to the South Wales regional thoracic centre (Llandough Hospital, Cardiff). Of these, five pleural tumours were diagnosed as primary pleural thymic epithelial neoplasms. From the files of the Mesopath group, Caen, three additional cases of thymic epithelial tumours with pleural involvement were identified. The study group comprised eight cases (four males, four females) with median age at presentation of 56 years (range 19-75 years). In one case there was a history of asbestos exposure. Macroscopically, seven tumours formed diffuse pleural masses. No mediastinal abnormality or intraparenchymal lesions were seen in five cases. By light microscopy, seven thymic epithelial neoplasms showed a lobulated architecture, one appeared extensively cystic. The tumours were of varied morphological subtypes: one medullary (WHO Type A), two mixed (WHO Type AB), three predominantly cortical (WHO Type B1) and two cortical (WHO Type B1). The subtypes morphologically mimicked sarcomatoid, biphasic, lymphohistiocytoid variant and epithelioid mesothelioma. The pleural thymic epithelial tumours showed immunoreactivity with broad spectrum cytokeratin AE1/AE3 (8/8; 100%), CK5/6 (8/8; 100%), and 1/8 (13%) expressed thrombomodulin. Calretinin showed variable nuclear and cytoplasmic expression in all cases, but equivocally in the thymic epithelial cell component. In 7/8 (88%) the thymic epithelial cells exhibited focal aberrant expression of CD20. Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) showed focal expression in the perivascular and organoid areas in 6/8 (75%) cases. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CD34 were uniformly negative. In 4/8 (50%) cases the lymphoid cell component was of immature phenotype expressing CD99, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) and lymphoid precursors had a high proliferation fraction with Ki67. In the series of 20 primary mediastinal thymic epithelial tumours tested, mesothelial marker expression revealed CK5/6 (20/20), thrombomodulin (3/20; 15%) and calretinin (0/20; 0%). Varying amounts of calretinin-positive stromal cells were present. CONCLUSION: Primary pleural thymic epithelial tumours are rare but may mimic malignant mesothelioma by forming diffuse serosal-based masses. In addition, both tumours may show morphological diversity (with epithelial, spindled and mixed components present). An awareness that thymic epithelial tumours may variably express the mesothelial markers CK5/6, calretinin and thrombomodulin prevents misdiagnosis. In the distinction from malignant mesothelioma a lobulated architecture and organoid features favour a thymic epithelial neoplasm. The presence of aberrant CD20 expression in a cytokeratin-positive epithelial neoplasm and/or the presence of an immature lymphoid population (by demonstration of CD1a, CD2, CD99 and TdT) indicates a thymic epithelial neoplasm. In contrast, nuclear calretinin expression favours malignant mesothelioma.     

Immunohistochemical localization of Mcl-1 and bcl-2 proteins in thymic epithelial tumours

Mcl-1 protein is a new member of the bcl-2 protein family. It is believed to be a blocker of apoptosis but might be different from bcl-2 in the control of apoptosis. Using immunostaining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections, we investigated the expression of Mcl-1 in 42 thymic epithelial tumours: three medullary thymomas, five mixed thymomas, seven cortical thymomas, eight well-differentiated thymic carcinomas, 14 squamous cell carcinomas, four lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas and one undifferentiated carcinoma. bcl-2 immunocytochemical localization was also performed for comparison. High-grade thymic carcinomas, especially squamous cell carcinomas, revealed more intense Mcl-1 immunoreactivity as compared to other subtypes ( P < 0.001). In cases that co-expressed Mcl-1 and bcl-2, the less differentiated cells had more intense expression of bcl-2, while the more differentiated cells displayed stronger Mcl-1 immunoreactivity. The differential expression of Mcl-1 and bcl-2 in neoplastic cells provides evidence that these proteins may play different roles in the processes of programmed cell death in thymic neoplasms. The finding that thymic carcinomas have stronger immunoreactivity for Mcl-1 indicates that this protein could be a useful marker to differentiate aggressive thymic epithelial tumours from indolent ones.     

Expression of p63 in thymomas and normal thymus

The p63 gene, a member of the p53 family, is an epithelial marker expressed in embryonic ectoderm, breast myoepithelium, prostate, oral epithelium, epidermis, and urothelium. The DeltaN-p63 isoforms of p63, which are believed to behave as oncogenes, are expressed in squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and transitional cell carcinoma. Only a few authors have looked for p63 expression in thymomas and normal thymus. We, therefore, thought of undergoing such a search by taking advantage of our archival material. We studied 66 cases of thymoma (1 type A, 8 type AB, 12 type B1, 19 type B2, 12 type B3, and 14 type C/thymic carcinoma) and 10 specimens of normal human thymus arranged in tissue microarrays. All thymomas (including thymic carcinomas) were positive for p63 regardless of type. Most of the epithelial cells of the normal thymus were also positive for this marker.     

Immunohistochemical demonstration of H antigen, peanut agglutinin receptor, and Saphora japonica receptor expression in infant thymuses and thymic neoplasias.

Ten infant thymuses and 13 primary thymic tumors obtained from archived paraffin-embedded tissue were examined for the presence of tissue blood group O antigen (H), peanut agglutinin receptor antigen (PNA-r), Saphora japonica agglutinin receptor antigen (SJA-r), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin (CK), and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). In the thymuses studied, Hassall's corpuscles contained abundant immunoreactive CK, PNA-r, and H antigens, whereas CEA, SJA-r, and EMA were present focally in Hassall's corpuscles. Immunoreactive CK, PNA-r, and CEA were demonstrated focally in the subcapsular region, cortical nurse cells, and subcapsular-perivascular monocytic cells, respectively. PNA-r was present in all 12 epithelial type tumors, including all eight thymomas. CEA was present in nine tumors, including six thymomas. Six thymomas contained H antigen and SJA-r; five continued CK and EMA. SJA-r and EMA were also present in one carcinoid tumor of thymic origin. In epithelial thymomas, the antigens stained nests of epithelial cells resembling the pattern of staining in Hassall's corpuscles. Membrane staining of spindle cells of both spindle cell and epithelial thymomas was less intense than staining of epithelial type cells.     

肾细胞癌的临床病理与免疫表型研究

目的 研究肾细胞癌的临床病理特征、预后及免疫表型特点.方法 复习114例肾细胞癌的临床病理资料、HE切片,按2004年WHO肾肿瘤分类标准重新分类、随访并进行免疫组织化学染色.结果 114例.肾细胞癌包括5个类型,肾透明细胞癌77例(67.5%)、乳头状肾癌11例(9.6%)、肾嫌色细胞癌14例(12.3%)、Xp11.2易位_/TFE3基因融合相关性肾癌10例(8.8%)、未能分类肾肿瘤2例(1.8%).免疫组织化学结果,肾透明细胞癌主要表达CK(93.5%,72/77)、CD10(93.5%,72/77)、波形蛋白(75.3%,58/77),乳头状肾癌主要表达α-甲酰基辅酶A消旋酶(AMACR,11/11),肾嫌色细胞癌主要表达CD117(11/14),Xp11.2易位/TFE3基因融合相关性肾癌TFE3、AMACR、CD10和CK的阳性率分别为10/10、10/10、9/10和7/10.结论 肾癌是一组形态学上各有特征的异质性肿瘤,在形态学基础上,CD10、波形蛋白、CD117、AMACR、CK7、TFE3有助于亚型的诊断.     

Squamous cell carcinomas. An immunohistochemical study of cytokeratins and involucrin in primary and metastatic tumours

The expression of cytokeratins (CK) 1, 4, 5/6, 8, 13, 18, 19 and 20 and involucrin in 42 cases of squamous cell carcinomas from various locations was examined. The tumours expressed CK5/6 in 55%, CK8 in 76%, CK13 in 43% and CK19 in 95% of cases. The CK5/6-positive primary tumours were from uterine cervix, head and neck, lung, skin, oesophagus is and urinary bladder, and the CK13-positive primary tumours were from uterine cervix, lung and vulva. Metastatic squamous cell carcinomas from head and neck more frequently expressed CK5/6 and 13, 7/7 (100%) and 6/7 (86%) compared with 3/5 (60%) and 0/5 (0%) in the primary squamous cell carcinomas. Few cases were CK1, CK4 and CK18 immunoreactive, CK20 immunoreactivity was not observed. Involucrin was expressed in 71% of tumours, and most of the involucrin-positive cells were located at the central parts of tumour cell clusters except for one case in which the peripheral cells around tumour cell clusters were positive. Thus, expression of the so-called simple epithelial markers CK8 and CK19 occurs in the majority of squamous cell carcinomas. The absence of CK20 immunoreactivity may be helpful in differential diagnosis.     

Can renal oncocytoma be differentiated from its renal mimics? The utility of anti-mitochondrial,caveolin 1, CD63 and cytokeratin 14 antibodies in the differential diagnosis

Among the epithelial renal tumours with eosinophilic cytoplasm, the main differential diagnostic problem arises between renal oncocytomas (ROs) and eosinophilic variants of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). We investigated the possible role of anti-mitochondrial (AMA), anti-caveolin 1 (CAV1), anti-CD63 (CD63) and anti-cytokeratin 14 (CK14) antibodies in the differential diagnosis of eosinophilic epithelial tumours and applied the Muller and Mowry modification of Hale's colloidal iron stain (HCI). Thirty-five ROs and 77 eosinophilic RCCs (27 chromophobe, 28 clear cell and 22 papillary RCCs) were included in this study. Apical and/or polar CD63 immunostaining (94%) and diffuse AMA (91%) and CAV1 (88%) immunostainings were the characteristics of ROs, whereas diffuse CD63 immunostaining (96%) and diffuse-peripheral AMA (96%) and CAV1 (92%) immunostainings were characteristic immunohistochemical features of eosinophilic chromophobe RCCs. We showed CK14 antibody not to be useful in the differential diagnosis of the eosinophilic epithelial renal tumours. The staining localisations with AMA, CAV1 and CD63 antibodies were significantly different between tumour groups. AMA had 96% sensitivity and 94% specificity, whereas CAV1 had 92% sensitivity and 97% specificity in diagnosing chromophobe RCCs. With HCI staining, ROs, showing apical and/or polar staining, could be differentiated from chromophobe RCCs, showing diffuse cytoplasmic staining. HCI had fairly low (69%) sensitivity and 100% specificity, whereas CD63 had 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity to diagnose ROs. We recommend using CD63 as the best marker of choice for distinguishing ROs from eosinophilic chromophobe RCCs when standard diagnostic criteria are not helpful.     

TDT (-), KIT (+), CD34 (+), CD99 (+) precursor T lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma

Although the definition of precursor T lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) is based only on histopathology, most cases cannot be diagnosed only by HE sections. Since 95% of T-LBL expresses TdT and TdT is expressed only in lymphoblasts, immunohistochemical demonstration of TdT is mandatory for the diagnosis of TLBL. However, little is known about the expression of other precursor cell molecules. A 58-year-old woman with myelodysplastic syndrome (RAEB) became overt acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). She was treated twice with allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from her son. Nine months later, imaging modalities detected a soft tissue tumor around the left ileal bone. A biopsy was performed. Histologically, the tumor cells were malignant polymorphic lymphoid cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and inconspicuous nucleoli. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are positive for CD45, CD45RO, CD34, KIT (CD117), CD99 (MIC-2), p53, CD10, PDGFRA, and Ki67 (labeling=60%). They were negative for pancytokeratin AE1/3, pancytokeratin CAM5.2, TdT, CD3, CD20, CD79α, CD43, CD56, CD57, CD30, bcl-2, κ-chain, λ-chain, cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK20, synaptophysin, chromogranin, smooth muscle actin, p63, MPO, CD68, lysozyme, and ASD esterase. Although TdT was negative, other precursor cell markers (KIT, CD34, and CD99) were positive and the lymphoid cells showed T-cell lineage, the diagnosis was T-LBL. The patient died of lymphoma/ leukemia 11 months after the diagnosis. The author stress that TdT, KIT, CD34 and CD99 should be included in panels of precursor T-cell neoplasms. In addition, the author think that KIT, CD34 and CD99 are helpful for the diagnosis of T-LBL in cases negative for TdT. Further, it is unique that this case was not myeloid sarcoma but precursor T-cell neoplasm, and that T-LBL develops during AML.