Total laparoscopic aortic surgery: transperitoneal direct approach.

OBJECTIVE: We describe the laparoscopic transperitoneal direct approach to the abdominal aorta. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: The patient is placed in the right lateral decubitus position, which allows dropping of the small bowel into right side of the abdomen. Anatomical exposure of the abdominal aorta follows the same steps as in open surgery. DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic transperitoneal direct approach allows a reproducible exposure of the abdominal aorta. This technique was useful when retrocolic and/or retrorenal approaches were not possible because of previous left nephrectomy.     

Comparison of open surgery versus retroperitoneoscopic approach to chyluria

PURPOSE: We compared the clinical effectiveness of renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection for chyluria performed by retroperitoneoscopy and by open surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three male and 4 female patients 33 to 68 years old (mean age 49) with chyluria underwent retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection. Chyluria was on the left side in 5 cases and on the right side in 2. Open renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection was performed in 4 men and 2 women 33 to 61 years old (mean age 45.8). Chyluria was on the left and right sides in 3 cases each. Mean operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital delay and operative outcome were compared in these 2 groups. RESULTS: Compared with the open surgery group results in the retroperitoneoscopic group were superior in terms of operative time (42 to 90 minutes, mean +/- SD 65.0 +/- 18.8 versus 120 to 220, mean 156.7 +/- 38.8), intraoperative blood loss (20 to 50 ml., mean 29.3 +/- 10.2 versus 60 to 250, mean 171.7 +/- 76.5), postoperative intestinal function recovery time (24 to 48 hours, mean 36.0 +/- 6.9 versus 24 to 72, mean 54.0 +/- 21.1), intraoperative and postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay (3 to 6 days, mean 4.7 +/- 0.7 versus 7 to 9 days, mean 7.8 +/- 1.0). In the open surgery group primary anastomosis was performed in 1 case due to injury to a renal artery branch during the operation. Chyluria resolved the day after surgery in the 2 groups. No obvious complications developed postoperatively. The followup of 2 to 12 months (mean 6.7 +/- 4.0) showed no recurrence of chyluria. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopic renal pedicle lymphatic disconnection completely ligates the lymphatic vessels with minimal invasion, less blood loss, rapid recovery and a good short-term outcome.     

Total laparoscopic repeat aortic surgery

We report our initial experience with total laparoscopic repeat aortic surgery between June 2002 and October 2003. There were 4 patients, 3 men and 1 woman, ages 83, 67, 49, and 61 years, respectively. First operations were performed to treat aortoiliac occlusive disease. Repeat aortic surgery was indicated to treat para-anastomotic aneurysms (n = 2) and graft occlusion (n = 2). All patients underwent total laparoscopic surgery. There were no postoperative deaths. Only 1 patient had postoperative complications that required complementary surgical treatment. All patients were alive with patent revascularization after a mean follow-up of 14, 17, 20, and 12 months, respectively.     

Total laparoscopic aortic aneurysm surgery

This paper describes our technique and results with total laparoscopic aortic aneurysm repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A transperitoneal left retrorenal access was used in all cases. Special laparoscopic clamps often in combination with balloon catheters were used to occlude the aorta and the renal arteries. Exactly the same techniques like in open surgery were used. Either a tube graft or a bifurcated graft,anastomosed with the iliac arteries or the femoral arteries, was implanted to exclude the aneurysm. Laparoscopic surgery is becoming a third way to perform aortic aneurysm repair. In contrast to EVAR it can offer to aneurysm patients the same definitive outcome which we obtain in open surgery.     

Surgical skill facilitation in videoscopic open surgery

The operating room (OR) was traditionally characterized as a closed environment, in which the view of the operative field was available to the surgeon and assistant only. In laparoscopy, integration of technology into the surgical theatre has transformed surgical procedures into minimally invasive events, with viewing of the surgical field using endoscopic cameras. Similar technical advances to the open surgical environment will allow visualization and coordination of finer surgical maneuvers on standard video monitors. The objective of this study was to develop optimal protocols for performing basic open surgical maneuvers without direct viewing of the operating field, instead watching a monitor that displays the image of the surgical field captured by an endoscopic camera. The AESOP robotic arm and Alpha Virtual Port (Computer Motion, Goleta, California) were used to hold the endoscopic camera in different positions relative to the surgeon and the operative table. The surgeons conducting the study evaluated six such different setups. Based on the average time to complete the task in each of these setups and the ease of adaptation to the new working conditions, we concluded that at least one of these setups could be translated into the OR. The advantages of integrating video image enhancement over classical open surgery (OS) are that the surgical field can be magnified to perform finer maneuvers, and to share views of the surgical field with additional clinicians and trainees.     

Skill performance in open videoscopic surgery

Introduction Application of minimally invasive surgery represents the future of modern surgical care. Previous studies by our group provided a novel way for viewing open surgery using a rigid endoscope attached to charged coupled device (CCD) camera in proximity to the surgical field using a robotic arm (AESOP) and a stabilizing fulcrum (Alpha port). Materials and methods This study is a follow-up to investigate the technical feasibility, advantages, and disadvantages of relying only on video images displayed on standard monitors in performing open surgical procedures instead of direct binocular eye vision. This study used two surgeons as participants with training in basic surgical skill and previous experience in performing an intestinal anastomosis in an ordinary fashion. The standard task consisted of anastomosing porcine intestine in two layers with digital viewing of the operative field. A total of 40 anastomoses (20 by each surgeon) were compared with 10 control performances using direct vision of the field. Results All the resulting anastomoses were accurate, well coapted, and fully patent with no leakage. Time for task performance was approximately twice as long (p < 0.05) with videoscopic vision as with direct vision. Discussion These findings suggest it is technically feasible to conduct open surgeries with visualization of the open surgical field limited to video display on standard monitors.     

Total videoscopic treatment of a type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm

We performed a total videoscopic type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient did well 10 months later. To our knowledge, a total videoscopic thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair has not been previously described.     

Minimally invasive videoscopic parathyroidectomy by lateral approach

Methods: A videoscopic parathyroidectomy was performed in 22 patients presenting with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). No patient had undergone previous neck surgery, presented with goiter or had a history of familial PHPT. Ultrasonography and Sestamibi scanning were performed preoperatively. Rapid intact parathormone assay was used during surgery. Through a 15-mm transversal skin incision on the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM), the fascia connecting the lateral portion of the strap muscles and the thyroid lobe with the carotid sheath was gently divided, far enough to visualize the prevertebral fascia. Once enough space was created, three trocars were inserted: a 12-mm trocar through the incision and two 2.5-mm trocars on the line of the anterior border of the SCM, above and below the first trocar. Carbon dioxide was insufflated to 8 mmHg. Unilateral video-assisted parathyroid exploration was then carried out using a 10-mm O° endoscope. Once the adenoma had been identified, the trocars were removed. Then, directly through the skin incision, the thyroid lobe was retracted medially and the adenoma was extracted after clipping its pedicle. Results: Among the 23 enlarged glands, 20 (80%) were correctly identified by endoscopic exploration: mean weight 843 mg (100 mg to 5 g). The exploration was unilateral in 17 patients but bilateral in 5. Mean time of unilateral endoscopic exploration was 84 min (40–130 min). Morbidity was represented by two superficial hematomas. All 22 patients were biochemically cured, follow-up ranging from 3 months to 14 months. Conclusions: This preliminary study demonstrates that minimally invasive videoscopic parathyroidectomy by lateral approach is a feasible surgical procedure. Received: 24 November 1998 Accepted: 3 March 1999     

Robot-assisted versus standard videoscopic aortic replacement. A comparative study in pigs.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the infrarenal aorta for aneurysms is routinely performed through laparotomy. A less invasive videoscopic approach has not gained wide acceptance due to technical difficulties. Robotic systems could potentially improve imaging of the operative field and surgeon's dexterity during videoscopic surgery and therefore might facilitate the performance of this procedure. The aim of this animal study was to compare the safety and efficacy of a robot-assisted videoscopic aortic replacement to the standard videoscopic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 10 female pigs, the infrarenal aorta was partially replaced by a 10 mm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) interposition graft through a videoscopic retroperitoneal approach, using the da Vinci robot system (robot group). Ten other pigs were operated on in a similar fashion, using standard videoscopic instruments (control group). Relevant procedure times, blood loss and complications were registered. Efficacy of the anastomoses was evaluated by measuring patency and blood loss after removing the clamps. Furthermore, circumference and number of stitches were evaluated at autopsy. RESULTS: The procedure, suturing and clamping times were significantly shorter in the robot group and blood loss was less. In the control group, the inferior vena cava was injured in one pig. In two cases in the control group, haemostasis could not be established after clamp removal. At autopsy, all anastomoses in the robot group were adequate. In the control group, a stitch crossing the aortic lumen was found in two distal anastomoses and a large distance (>3 mm) between two stitches was encountered at least once in 12/20 suture lines. All 20 grafts were patent. No anastomotic narrowing was encountered. The number of stitches used for proximal and distal anastomosis was higher in the robot group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the superiority of robot-assisted videoscopic aortic replacement over standard videoscopic techniques in an animal model.     

Retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgery

The retroperitoneal approach has been recently advocated as an alternate approach to abdominal aortic surgery rather than the traditional transperitoneal approach. A comparative analysis of these two approaches was undertaken to clarify the differences. From June 1984 through June 1986, 172 patients underwent elective infrarenal abdominal aortic surgery on the Vascular Surgery Service at Eastern Virginia Medical School. One hundred nineteen were operated through a transperitoneal approach, and 53 through a retroperitoneal approach. The two groups were similar relative to age, sex, indications, risk factors and operations performed. The groups were then analyzed relative to operating time, blood transfusion, fluid replacement, ileus, morbidity, length of hospital stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and mortality. Significant differences were found: retroperitoneal patients had shorter operating time, shorter ileus, fewer cardiac complications, and shorter hospitalization than transperitoneal patients. This retrospective evaluation supports the conclusion that the retroperitoneal approach to abdominal aortic surgery is safe and beneficial in most patients. The retroperitoneal approach should therefore be given consideration in routine aortic surgery.     

Minimal access surgery for hydatid cyst disease: laparoscopic,thoracoscopic, and retroperitoneoscopic approach

Surgery has remained the mainstay for the treatment of hydatid cyst. The rapid development of laparoscopic techniques has encouraged surgeons to replicate principles of conventional hydatid surgery using a minimally invasive approach. Several reports have confirmed the feasibility of laparoscopic hepatic hydatid surgery. We report the use of a laparoscopic approach for cysts located in the liver, lung, and retroperitoneum. Fifteen patients with hydatid cysts, including one patient with a recurrent cyst, of various organs, including the liver, lung, and retroperitoneum, were operated on laparoscopically. Sixteen hydatid cysts were drained in a total of 15 patients. The mean operative time was 84 +/- 6 minutes (60-125 minutes). The mean duration of the hospital stay was 2.3 days (1-6 days). The mean cyst diameter was 9.2 cm (6.4-13.5 cm). No conversions to open surgery were required. One complication, a trocar-induced bowel perforation, occurred, and there was no mortality. During 3 to 44 months (mean, 27 months) of follow-up, no recurrences developed. Minimal access surgery is a safe, effective, and viable option for the management of selected patients with hydatid cysts in various locations, such as the liver, lung, and retroperitoneum.     

Quantitative approach to aortic valve-sparing surgery

Our goal was to understand why it is difficult to achieve reliable valve competence after aortic valve-sparing surgery, and to propose quantitative data aimed at improving the outcome of the procedure. Valve-sparing procedures were performed in patients with dilated aortic roots and aortic regurgitation, and reproduced in physical models to explore what should be the restored dimensions of the aortic root and leaflets for valve sparing to be successful. In parallel, a three-dimensional geometric model of the aortic valve was tested to evaluate its capability to predict the annulus diameter, sinotubular junction diameter, valve height, and leaflet free-edge length and height in competent spared valves. Valve sparing resulted in more or less severe residual regurgitation in all the patients considered. Successful valve-sparing was achieved in vitro by making further changes to the annulus diameter, the leaflet free-edge length and/or graft size. The changes needed were effectively predicted by the geometric model. Tabulated valve dimensions allowing restoration of competence were generated for convenient use by surgeons. A quantitative approach to aortic valve sparing is proposed, putting emphasis on the functional characteristics of the restored valve geometry.     

Left retroperitoneal approach for aortic surgery

Twenty-eight consecutive patients underwent surgery of the abdominal aorta by the left retroperitoneal approach. There were 11 suprarenal, 12 juxtarenal, three complicated infrarenal aneurysms and two occlusive aortoiliac disease (considered to be at high risk) undergoing surgical repair. Twenty-one underwent a tube graft repair whilst seven had a bifurcation graft. There were five deaths in this series; four of which occurred in the initial 12 patients. In our initial experience using the left retroperitoneal approach the overall mortality rate was 17%, though this reduced to 6% for the latter half of the study. The retroperitoneal approach allows access to the supracoeliac aorta without the need for thoracotomy and this approach should be considered for all aortoiliac reconstructive surgery.The transabdominal route to the abdominal aorta remains the most commonly used approach. However, the left retroperitoneal approach offers advantages in high-risk patients and suprarenal and juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). This is our initial experience of 28 patients undergoing surgical repair of the abdominal aorta via the left retroperitoneal approach.     

Total aortic arch replacement through the L-incision approach

BACKGROUND: Even though the median sternotomy is the standard approach for surgery involving the aortic arch, access to the site of distal anastomosis is problematic when the aortic pathology involves the distal arch. We recently developed an "L-incision" approach (a combination of a left anterior thoracotomy and upper half median sternotomy) for total arch replacement. METHODS: We reviewed our surgical technique and operative results for 11 patients who underwent total aortic arch replacement through the L-incision between July 1999 and July 2000. With a patient in a left anterolateral position, a left anterior thoracotomy was performed through the fourth to sixth intercostal space. An upper half median sternotomy followed. Operative exposure was enhanced with spring retractors. The proximal anastomosis (between the four branched graft and ascending aorta) was accomplished first. Upon completion of the proximal anastomosis, the heart was reperfused from one branch of the graft. The three arch vessels were subsequently reconstructed under deep hypothermia and retrograde cerebral perfusion. Antegrade cerebral perfusion was accomplished through the graft as the distal anastomosis (between the graft and descending thoracic aorta) was performed. RESULTS: No early operative deaths were observed. One patient sustained a permanent neurologic deficit. A transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy lasting 1 month occurred in 1 patient. No patient required reoperations for bleeding, nor did any patient develop a postoperative phrenic nerve palsy, aspiration pneumonia, or renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The L-incision allows extensive replacement of the aortic arch and is associated with a low incidence of postoperative bleeding and respiratory insufficiency.     

Abdominal aortic surgery and the left renal vein

The existence of variations in the anatomy of the left renal vein is an important consideration for the surgeon undertaking resection or reconstruction of the abdominal aorta. These variations are not uncommon and an awareness of them is essential in preventing troublesome operative complications.Sacrifice of the left renal vein may occasionally be necessary, and if care is taken to ligate the vein on the vena caval side of the adrenal and spermatic veins and to preserve these veins, serious damage to the kidney is unlikely although not impossible.     

Total aortic arch replacement for thoracic aneurysm involving an isolated left vertebral artery.

We conducted 4 total aortic arch replacements in patients with an isolated left vertebral artery. In all 4, surgery was done using 4-branched arch grafts with moderately hypothermic selective cerebral perfusion and systemic circulatory arrest. All reconstructed isolated left vertebral arteries anastomosed to the native left subclavian artery or to the graft branch for this artery showed good patency. None of our patients had cerebral complications and all were discharged in good condition.     

The retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgery associated with horseshoe kidney.

The horseshoe kidney is a rare anomaly that can significantly complicate aortic surgery. A bulky isthmus, abnormalities of renal anatomy, and a variable blood supply associated with a horseshoe kidney can pose technical difficulties in terms of aortic reconstruction. The left retroperitoneal approach affords an excellent exposure of the abdominal aorta in patients with a horseshoe kidney without dividing the renal isthmus and avoids the risk of injury to a ureter in an anomalous location. This is a case report of a patient with a horseshoe kidney who underwent a successful repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm by a left retroperitoneal approach.