Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in the hemodialysis unit.

An enzyme immunoassay was used to detect antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in 261 patients and 69 staff members of a hemodialysis unit. The prevalence of anti-HCV was 46.7% in patients and 2.9% in staff members (p less than 0.001). The prevalence of anti-HCV increased significantly with increasing duration of hemodialysis (p less than 0.001), but was not related to age, sex, history of blood transfusion, status of hepatitis B or hepatitis A virus infection, or serum ALT. Patients with hepatitis episode increased with increasing duration of hemodialysis and showed a significantly higher prevalence of anti-HCV than those without (63.1 vs. 34.7%, p less than 0.001). The prevalence of anti-HCV in patients with hepatitis also increased with increasing duration of hemodialysis (p = 0.05). Thus, HCV appears to be the major cause of hepatitis in hemodialysis patients. Besides strict infection control measures, further studies are needed to determine the mode of HCV infection and its prevention in the hemodialysis unit.     

Prevalence of antibodies against hepatitis C virus in a dialysis unit.

Anti-HCV was tested in 77 uremic patients, 48 on hemodialysis (HD), 29 on CAPD, by immunoenzymatic 1st and 2nd generation assays (ELISA I, II) and 4-antigen (4-RIBA) immublotting. The investigation was extended to the staff (n = 29) and to HCV-positive patients' families (n = 30). The prevalence using 2nd generation tests was double (21%) that in 1st generation tests (11%). A greater incidence in the HD than in the CAPD group (23 vs. 17%) and a highly significative correlation to dialytic age were observed. No one among the sanitary personnel and only 2 family members were found HCV positive, suggesting a low infectivity via the parenteral inevident route. Extracorporeal circulation and particularly the exposure time to the treatment seem to be the main risk factors.     

Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients.

Due to frequent parenteral contact with blood transfusions hemodialysis patients are prone to acquire hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. To determine the role of HCV infection we investigated the prevalence of antibodies to HCV in 188 hemodialysis patients. The prevalence of antibodies to HCV was 7.4%. As compared to anti-HCV-negative patients, anti-HCV-positive patients had slightly elevated transaminases which were independent of the presence of markers for hepatitis B virus infection. We conclude that HCV infection is common among dialysis patients.     

Prevalence,incidence, and risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients

1. Download high-res image (432KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Prevalence of hepatitis C virus genotypes in a Spanish liver transplant unit

INTRODUCTION: Among the at least six major identified genotypes of HCV, genotype 1b, the one associated with a poorer prognosis, is the most prevalent in Spain. We aimed to compare the distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in our liver transplant unit with that of the other HCV patients at our institution (n = 413) in order to assess whether genotype 1b is more prevalent among patients with more severe liver disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eight patients of mean age 56 years included 81 (75%) OLT recipients and 27 (25%) with HCV cirrhosis. Determination of HCV genotypes was made with the Inno-LiPA HCV III. RESULTS: The overall distribution of genotypes was: 1b, 93 patients (86.1%); 1a; eight patients (7.4%); 3, four patients (3.7%); 4; two patients (1.9%), and 2; one patient (0.9%). The distribution was similar among patients with cirrhosis and OLT. Genotype 1b patients were older. Eleven (78.6%) of 14 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma had genotype 1b. In the control group the distribution was: 1b, 287 patients (69.5%); 1a, 54 patients (12.1%); 3, 41 patients (9.9%); 4, 20 patients (4.8%), and genotype 2, 11 patients (2.7%). This differences in the distribution of genotypes between our population and the control group was statistically significant (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Genotype 1b, the most prevalent genotype in our liver transplant unit, included older patients in whom hepatocellular carcinoma was common, perhaps due to their higher prevalence of cirrhosis.     

Occult hepatitis C virus infection among hemodialysis patients

Occult hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (i.e., detectable HCV-RNA in the liver or peripheral blood mononuclear cells) in the absence of both serum HCV-RNA and anti-HCV antibodies has not been investigated in hemodialysis patients. In this study, real-time PCR and in situ hybridization was used to test for the presence of genomic and antigenomic HCV-RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 109 hemodialysis patients with abnormal levels of liver enzymes. Occult HCV infection, determined by the presence of genomic HCV-RNA, was found in 45% of the patients; 53% of these patients had ongoing HCV replication, indicated by the presence of antigenomic HCV-RNA. Patients with occult HCV infection had spent a significantly longer time on hemodialysis and had significantly higher mean alanine aminotransferase levels during the 6 mo before study entry. Logistic regression analysis revealed that mortality was associated with age >60 yr (odds ratio 3.30; 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 10.33) and the presence of occult HCV infection (odds ratio 3.84; 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 11.43). In conclusion, the prevalence of occult HCV infection is high among hemodialysis patients with persistently abnormal values of liver enzymes of unknown cause. The clinical significance of occult HCV infection in these patients requires further study.     

Prevalence of occult hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections in Turkish hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Although their exact prevalence is not known, HBV and HCV viral infections and occult viral hepatitis are frequent in these patients. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occult HBV and HCV infections in maintenance hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty-eight end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis (100 male, mean age 49+/-29 [16-80] years, and mean duration of hemodialysis 98+/-66 [12-228] months) were enrolled in this study. Serological markers for HBV and HCV were determined with immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) by using commercial diagnostic kits (Access and BioRad, Beckman-Coulter). HCV-RNA (Cobas Amplicor HCV kit) and HBV-DNA (Artus GmbH HBV kit) were determined quantitatively by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Among the patients screened, 25 (13.3%) had HBV infection alone and 38 (20.2%) had HCV infection alone, while seven (3.7%) had dual infection of both viruses. Serological markers for occult hepatitis B and occult hepatitis C were positive in five (2.7%) and nine (4.8%) of the patients, respectively. Isolated anti-HBc was positive in 12 (6.4%) of all patients, three (7.9%) of the patients with anti-HCV and two (40%) of the patients with occult hepatitis B. Isolated anti-HBc positivity was more frequent in patients with occult hepatitis B than in those without (40% [2/5] vs. 5.5% [10/183], p=0.002). None of the patients with HCV had occult hepatitis B. CONCLUSIONS: Both occult and non-occult forms of HCV infection are more prevalent than HBV infection in hemodialysis patients. Especially the patients with isolated anti-HBc positivity should be tested for probable occult hepatitis B infection.     

Prevalence of hepatitis C virus antibodies in hemodialysis patients in the area of Milan.

We studied the seroprevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV Ab) in a cohort of 229 chronic hemodialysis patients followed by 6 Dialysis Units in the Milan area. HCV Ab was present in 51 (22.3%) of 229 examined patients. Previous blood transfusions and surgery did not clearly influence HCV seroconversion, whereas duration of dialysis treatment seems to be strictly related to HCV Ab positivity.     

Incidence and risk factors of hepatitis C virus infection in a haemodialysis unit

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis viruses have become one of the main infectious problems in patients on maintenance haemodialysis. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the incidence of de novo hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a haemodialysis unit and to identify factors currently involved in HCV transmission to haemodialysis patients. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen anti-HCV negative and HCV-RNA negative patients who started long-term haemodialysis were followed for a mean period of 36 months (range 18- 56). Liver tests and anti-HCV were performed at 6-month intervals. Factors that might be implicated in HCV transmission, such as blood transfusions, sexual habits, surgery and other invasive procedures, were recorded. HCV markers were re-examined in transfused blood and the HCV genotype was investigated in seroconverters to anti-HCV and in patients with previous HCV infection who were treated in the vicinity of those who seroconverted. RESULTS: Eight patients (7%) seroconverted to anti-HCV and seven of them became HCV-RNA positive. HCV markers, including HCV-RNA, were negative in the blood transfused to seroconverters. No differences between seroconverters and non- seroconverters. No differences found in other risk factors not directly related to haemodialysis. The investigation of HCV genotype suggested that HCV transmission was not restricted to patients treated in the vicinity of previously HCV infected patients. Occasional failure to observe strict measures of asepsis was detected in the haemodialysis unit and this was the only factor that might be incriminating. CONCLUSIONS: HCV acquisition in patients on haemodialysis is currently not related to blood transfusion, and nosocomial transmission within the haemodialysis unit seems to be the main mechanism of HCV infection. Extremely careful observation of preventive measures seems essential to eradicate HCV transmission in haemodialysis units.      

Epidemiology of hepatitis C in a population of hemodialysis patients.

A search for antibodies against hepatitis C virus (HCV) was performed in 185 patients on chronic hemodialysis by means of 1st and 2nd generation ELISA tests. Immunoblot assays were performed on positive sera. This study shows a 38% prevalence of HCV-positive patients in our dialysis population according to the 2nd generation ELISA test which shows a higher specificity and sensitivity when compared to the 1st generation one (38 vs. 20%). A correlation was found between the prevalence of HCV-positive patients and how long they had been on dialysis and how many blood transfusions they had received.     

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in hemodialysis patients

The prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in patients who are on chronic hemodialysis due to end-stage renal failure is investigated and compared with the incidence in the healthy population. Stool specimens of 74 adult hemodialysis patients treated on an outpatient basis and 50 healthy individuals are examined for Cryptosporidium oocysts by using the modified acid-fast method. While 20.27% (15/74) of patients in the dialysis group had Cryptosporidium oocysts in their stools, none (0/50) of the controls had such an infection (p < 0.001). Ten of 15 patients who had Cryptosporidium oocysts in their stool specimens were asymptomatic and the remaining 5 had diarrhea. Four of these 5 diarrheic patients had Cryptosporidium oocysts in their stools and 1 had both Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia trophozoites. Since hemodialysis patients with chronic renal failure are candidates for renal transplantation, general preventive measures against infection must be taken and these patients must be screened for their carrier state before transplantation.     

维持性血液透析患者感染乙型和丙型肝炎的分析

目的为了评价血液透析（血透）患者乙型和丙型肝炎（HBV、HCV）感染状态及对临床情况和肝功能的影响。方法对62例血透患者应用ELISA法和RT-PCR法检测抗-HCV和HCVRNA，采用斑点杂交法和固相放免法检测HBV标志，并检测肝功能和血浆蛋白电泳。结果62例患者中，抗-HCVIgM阳性27例（43．6％），抗-HCVIgG阳性29例（46．8％），HCVRNA阳性34例（54．8％），三项任一项阳性37例（59．7％），5例（8．1％）HBsAg阳性，其中HBeAg和HBVDNA阳性3例。结论向透患者中HCV感染严重，临床情况及预后差，检测血浆蛋白和电泳较肝功能酶学能更好地作为肝炎诊断和反映病情的指标。     

Prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis B infection among hemodialysis patients in Tabriz: a multicenter report

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important issue in hemodialysis. Risk factors and local prevalence varies between different regions. The current study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of HBV infection and its associated risk factors among hemodialysis patients from five hemodialysis centers in Tabriz, a Northwestern Iranian city. Hepatitis B serologic markers were evaluated in chronic hemodialysis patients. Patients (n = 412) were divided into two groups: Group 1--patients with positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and Group 2--patients with negative HBsAg. The median age was 54.9 years (range, 13-90 years). Thirteen patients (3.2%) were found to be positive for HBsAg. Among the studied factors, the history of war injury was significantly associated with the risk of HBV infection (P = 0.023). In conclusion, our study shows that the risk of HBV infection among Tabrizian hemodialysis patients is a factor of dialysis-independent parameters.     

Elevation of blood thioredoxin in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND: Thioredoxin (TRX) is a stress-inducible thiol-containing protein, which has been shown to be an indicator of oxidative stress in a variety of diseases. The association between oxidative stress and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, however, remains unknown in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: We measured serum TRX levels in 85 hemodialysis patients positive for anti-HCV antibodies (age, 60 +/- 1 years old; hemodialysis duration, 17 +/- 1 years; M/F = 57/28) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and examined whether blood TRX may be associated with HCV-related hepatic injury. RESULTS: Serum TRX was significantly higher in hemodialysis patients with HCV infection (112.3 +/- 3.7 ng/mL, N = 85) than in those without HCV infection (69.7 +/- 3.3 ng/mL, N = 59) (age, 69 +/- 2 years old; hemodialysis duration, 6 +/- 1 years; M/F = 32/27, P < 0.01) or normal subjects (28.0 +/- 5.4 ng/mL, N = 9). TRX was significantly correlated with time on hemodialysis (r = 0.27, P = 0.01) in HCV-positive patients, while it was associated with the patient's age in HCV-negative patients (r = 0.42, P < 0.01). Blood TRX was significantly correlated with asparate aminotransferase in patients with HCV infection (r = 0.34, P < 0.01) and without HCV infection (r = 0.46, P < 0.01). However, serum TRX was not associated with blood alanine aminotransferase, a relatively specific marker of hepatic cellular damage, in HCV-infected hemodialysis patients. A significant relationship was found between serum ferritin and TRX (r = 0.25, P = 0.02) and malondialdehyde (MDA) values (r = 0.25, P = 002) in HCV-positive patients. Serum TRX was also higher in the patients receiving weekly iron supplement with HCV infection (135.3 +/- 10.2 ng/mL vs. 110.2 +/- 3.9 ng/mL, P = 0.06) and without HCV infection (91.8 +/- 12.1 ng/mL vs. 65.2 +/- 2.7 ng/mL, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: There was a greater increase in serum TRX in hemodialysis patients with HCV viremia than without HCV viremia. However, there may not be an association between serum TRX and HCV-related hepatic injury. TRX increased with serum ferritin in HCV-infected patients and further increased by iron infusion. These findings indicate that HCV infection and iron loading may aggravate oxidative stress in dialysis patients.     

Hepatitis G virus infection in hemodialysis patients and its relationship with hepatitis C virus infection

Our aim was to study the characteristics of hepatitis G virus (HGV) infection in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We evaluated 108 patients from two different units (A: 67 patients; B: 41 patients). HGV RNA and HCV RNA were detected by PCR. Nineteen patients (17.6%) were HGV RNA positive (20.9% in unit A and 12.2% in unit B (NS)). HCV RNA was positive in 19 patients (17.6%) (28.4% in unit A and 0 in unit B (p < 0.01)). Eight patients were HGV RNA and HCV RNA positive (group I), 11 HGV RNA positive (group II), 11 HCV RNA positive (group III), and 78 negative for both viruses (group IV). Time on HD was 51.3 +/- 37.0 months for group I, 36.0 +/- 27.9 months for group II, 63.5 +/- 40.2 months for group III, and 26.4 +/- 27.1 months for group IV (p < 0.01 for I and III). Seven patients (87.5%) from group I, 9 (81.8%) from group II, 10 (90.9%) from group III, and 44 (56.4%) from group IV had a history of transfusion (p < 0.03 for I, II and III). Two patients (25%) from group I, none from group II, 5 (45.4%) from group III, and 6 (7.7%) from group IV had chronic ALAT elevation (p < 0.01 for I and III). We conclude that HGV infection was frequent in our HD patients, related to transfusions and independent of HCV prevalence, and that HGV infection itself was not a cause of ALAT elevation suggesting chronic hepatitis.     

Development of porphyria cutanea tarda in a hemodialysis patient after reactivation of hepatitis C virus infection

Cases of porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT) are occasionally reported in hemodialysis patients. Recently, hepatitis C virus has been recognized as a precipitating factor of PCT. The activity of the liver disease may be critical for the appearance of PCT. In this regard, liver disease reactivation after treatment with interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) is a well-known phenomenon. We report the case of a hemodialysis patient who developed PCT coincidentally with reactivation of liver disease, immediately after treatment with IFN-alpha. Therefore, in the present case, reactivation of hepatitis after IFN-alpha withdrawal could be the triggering factor. The occurrence of a bout of PCT should be considered as a possible complication at the end of IFN-alpha therapy, if reactivation of the disease exists.