Risk factors for colorectal adenomas among immediate family members of patients with colorectal cancer in Taiwan: a case-control study

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of colorectal cancer or adenoma among first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer is significantly high. However, a well defined screening and surveillance consensus has not been developed for these families in Taiwan. We conducted this study to evaluate the colorectal adenoma prevalence pattern in screened immediate family members in Taiwan, and to derive implications for future screening programs. METHODS: A total of 234 immediate family members (aged 51.6 +/- 21.5 yr) of 186 patients with colorectal cancer were offered a colonoscopy. Each relative examined was then paired with two control subjects for age, sex, and symptoms. The prevalence of colorectal adenomas was then compared using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The estimated risk of developing adenomas among immediate family members of patients with colorectal cancer was significantly increased (OR = 2.33; 95% CI, 1.43-3.78; p < 0.001). This trend was more striking for men (OR = 2.46; 95% CI, 1.40-4.31; p = 0.001). Immediate family members were at an increased risk for high-risk adenomas (> or = 1.0 cm, with a villous component, and/or with severe dysplasia) (OR = 4.5; 95% CI, 1.91-10.60; p = 0.002), and developed adenomas at an earlier age than did controls. Individuals with index cancer relatives diagnosed at < 50 yr of age or male relatives posed a higher risk of developing colorectal adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of colorectal adenoma in persons with a colorectal cancer family history in Taiwan is similar to that reported in Western countries. This high-risk population should be offered a screening colonoscopy beginning at 40 yr of age.     

Colonoscopic screening of persons with suspected risk factors for colon cancer. I. Family history

A family history of colorectal cancer is believed to place persons at increased risk for development of the disease. It is unclear, however, how "strong" a family history must be to increase this risk or to make colonoscopic screening appropriate. We performed initial colonoscopy in 154 asymptomatic subjects whose only suspected risk factor was one or two first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer; 48 of these subjects also had affected second- and third-degree relatives. We found 45 adenomas in 28 subjects (18%). One subject had a 3-cm villous adenoma. In 6 subjects, the most advanced findings were tubular adenomas 5-9 mm in diameter; in 21 subjects, we found only tubular adenomas that were 2-4 mm in diameter. The prevalence of adenomas increased significantly with age of subjects (p less than 0.01). Although the overall prevalence of colorectal neoplasms in our group was no greater than might be expected in the general population, subjects with two first-degree relatives tended to have more diminutive adenomas than those with one such relative. Our findings suggest that colonoscopy is not an appropriate first step in screening persons with one affected first-degree relative. For those with more complex family histories, more data are needed--particularly on the prevalence of advanced neoplasms--to determine whether a screening technique that is less costly and less invasive than colonoscopy may be adequate.     

First-degree relatives of patients with advanced colorectal adenomas have an increased prevalence of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The risk of colorectal cancer in relatives of patients with adenomatous colonic polyps is not well defined. This study assessed whether finding colonic neoplasia during screening colonoscopy was related to the family history of colorectal cancer among the participants' parents and siblings. METHODS: Self-reported family history of colorectal cancer was recorded for all participants in a screening colonoscopy study. The size and location of all polyps were recorded before their removal and histologic examination. Participants were grouped according to the most advanced lesion detected. RESULTS: Three thousand one hundred twenty-one patients underwent complete colonoscopic examination. Subjects with adenomas were more likely to have a family history of colorectal cancer than were subjects without polyps (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.70). The finding of a small (<1 cm) tubular adenoma as the most advanced lesion was associated with only a modest increase in the OR of colorectal cancer in family members (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.99-1.61), but the presence of an advanced adenoma was associated with a higher OR (OR, 1.62;5% CI, 1.16-2.26). Younger age of adenoma diagnosis was not related to a higher prevalence of a family history of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Relatives patients with advanced colorectal adenomas have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Individuals with advanced colorectal adenomas should be counseled about the increased risk of colorectal cancer among their relatives.     

Risk of colorectal adenomas in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer: some implications for screening programmes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Most colorectal cancers (CRC) arise in colorectal adenomas. A case-control study was conducted to see whether a family history of CRC is associated with a higher prevalence of colorectal adenomas. SUBJECTS: Subjects were drawn from all patients who underwent colonoscopy at the Royal Brisbane Hospital between 1980-1982 and 1985, and included 141 cases with colorectal adenomas diagnosed at colonoscopy and 882 controls who were free of polyps at colonoscopy. METHODS: The prevalence of family history of CRC was compared between patients with adenomas and negative colonoscopy controls. RESULTS: Overall, patients with one first degree relative with CRC were at no greater risk for adenomas at colonoscopy than patients with no family history (odds ratio (OR) = 0.8, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.4, 1.5). Patients with two or more affected first degree relatives had a more than doubled risk for adenomas (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 0.5, 8.2), and were also more likely to carry moderately or severely dysplastic adenomas (OR = 14.1, 95% CI = 2.0, 62.9). CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that some families, in addition to those with familial adenomatous polyposis, have an increased susceptibility to develop colorectal adenomas, and that adenomas in such families may have a greater tendency to undergo malignant transformation.     

Variables associated with the risk of colorectal adenomas in asymptomatic patients with a family history of colorectal cancer.

The results of screening individuals referred to the Family Cancer Clinic at St Mark's Hospital from 1986 are presented. Colonoscopy was performed in 644 asymptomatic individuals (from 436 families) with a family history of colorectal cancer. Sixty nine (15.8%) of the families fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria for the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndromes (HNPCC). Seven cases of colorectal cancer were diagnosed at an average age of 49 years; six at Dukes's stage A and one at stage C, four in subjects from Amsterdam criteria families. One hundred and forty four (22.4%) subjects had one or more adenomas. The prevalence of adenomas in the subjects from Amsterdam criteria families was 34 of 127 (26.8%) compared with 110 of 517 (21.3%) in those from other families; the age and sex adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.76 (p = 0.02). Factors influencing the prevalence of adenomas in screened individuals were evaluated. Multivariate analysis showed that independent variables significantly related to the risk of adenomas were: age (p < 0.0001), sex (p = 0.0002), and the number of generations (> or = 2 v 1) of relatives affected by either colorectal cancer or adenomas (p = 0.0006). The latter variable was more highly predictive of the probability of finding an adenoma at colonoscopy than a family history of two generations with cancer only (p = 0.056). The OR of having colorectal adenomas increased with age, by about twofold for each decade, and was twice as high in men than women, and in subjects with two or more generations relative to those with one generation affected by colorectal cancer or adenomas. Six of seven patients with cancer and 46 of 144 (31.9%) with adenomas had lesions proximal to the splenic flexure only. The proportion of individuals with proximal adenomas only was 47.1% in Amsterdam criteria families and 27.3% in the others (p=0.03). These findings support the view that colonoscopy rather than sigmoidoscopy is the method of choice for screening high risk groups.     

New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE: The fear that colorectal adenomas were missed on initial colonoscopy or that new adenomas have developed is often a rationale for repeating a colonoscopic examination. The aim of this study was to delineate risk factors associated with recurrence of colorectal adenomas after an initial baseline screening colonoscopy. METHODS: The study population comprised 875 subjects who underwent a baseline screening colonoscopy followed by a second examination 1-5 yr later. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the influence of potential risk factors on the occurrence or recurrence of colorectal adenomas, the strength of the influence being expressed as an OR with a 95% CI. RESULTS: Colorectal adenomas were detected in 484 of all patients (55%) at baseline colonoscopy. Within a 1- to 5-yr time interval, 181 patients (37%) had recurrent adenomas (adenomas were removed during the first colonoscopy) and 73 patients (19%) had newly developed adenomas (adenomas were absent on the first colonoscopy). The occurrence of adenomas at baseline screening colonoscopy was the only factor associated with an increased risk for the recurrence of adenomas at follow-up (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.77-3.55). Recurrence was associated with multiple baseline adenomas (4.45, 2.98-6.64) and baseline adenomas larger than 1 cm (2.62, 1.99-3.11). Recurrence was not associated with histology type or family history of colorectal cancer. There was a significant trend for adenomas to recur in the same proximal or distal segment as the baseline adenomas (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Colon adenomas tend to recur with greater frequency if the adenomas removed at baseline were either large or multiple. Although patients with large adenomas or multiple adenomas at baseline screening colonoscopy are at a 2.6- to 4.5-fold risk for recurrence of adenomas, the rate of de novo adenoma formation in patients without baseline adenomas may be large enough to warrant repeat colonoscopy at some time in the future. The exact timing of the follow-up colonoscopy needs to be determined.     

Daily soluble aspirin and prevention of colorectal adenoma recurrence: one-year results of the APACC trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Epidemiologic and experimental studies have suggested that aspirin intake reduces the risk for colorectal carcinogenesis. However, the available data are not sufficient to serve as the basis for firm recommendations. METHODS: We randomly assigned 272 patients with a history of colorectal adenomas (at least one more than 5 mm in diameter, or more than 3) to daily lysine acetylsalicylate (160 or 300 mg/day) or placebo for 4 years. The primary end points were adenoma recurrence after 1 and 4 years. These results are those of the year 1 colonoscopy. RESULTS: Among the 238 patients who completed the year 1 colonoscopy, at least one adenoma was observed in 38 patients of the 126 (30%) in the aspirin group and in 46 of the 112 (41%) in the placebo group; relative risk was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.04; P = 0.08). At least one adenoma of more than 5 mm diameter was observed in 13 patients (10%) in the aspirin group and 26 (23%) in the placebo group (P = 0.01). The corresponding numbers for adenomas more than 10 mm in diameter were one (1%) and 7 (6%) (P = 0.05). Stepwise regression showed that independent factors associated with lower adenoma recurrence are aspirin treatment (adenoma >5 mm, P = 0.01), absence of personal history of adenoma before the entry colonoscopy (P = 0.01), and initial adenomatous polyp burden less than 10 mm (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Daily soluble aspirin is associated with a reduction in the risk for recurrent adenomas found at colonoscopy 1 year after starting treatment.     

Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The prevalence of advanced histology in small polyps has become a crucial issue in optimizing colorectal cancer screening strategies, especially in view of the advent of computed tomography colonography. We evaluated the prevalence of advanced histology in small and diminutive adenomas to clarify their clinical importance in terms of malignant potential. METHODS: Data were reviewed retrospectively from 3291 colonoscopies performed on asymptomatic patients found to have an adenoma on screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy a few weeks before the colonoscopy or who had a family history of colorectal cancer. All polyps were excised endoscopically and sent for pathology testing. Specimens with advanced histology were confirmed by a second reading. RESULTS: Of the 3291 colonoscopies performed, 1235 colonoscopies yielded a total of 1933 small or diminutive adenomatous polyps. Advanced histology including carcinoma was found in 10.1% of small (5-10 mm) adenomas and in 1.7% of diminutive adenomas (< or = 4 mm). Carcinoma was found in .9% of small adenomas, and 0% of diminutive adenomas. Of the 107 patients found to have polyps 2-10 mm with advanced histology, 100 (93%) were referred for colonoscopy because of an adenoma found on a recent screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy. Seven patients underwent colonoscopy for a positive family history of colon cancer; all 7 had a single affected first-degree relative older than age 50. CONCLUSIONS: Adenomas 5-10 mm in size harbor pathologically significant histology, and the need for removal of these lesions must be addressed to optimize colorectal cancer prevention.     

Sporadic duodenal adenoma and the association with colorectal neoplasia: a case-control study

OBJECTIVES: Sporadic duodenal adenomas are an uncommon finding. It is not clear whether patients with sporadic duodenal adenoma have a greater risk for colorectal neoplasia and should undergo colonoscopy. The aims of the present study were to estimate the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in patients with sporadic duodenal adenoma, and to compare colorectal neoplasia rates in patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas versus those without them.
METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted to identify sporadic duodenal adenoma patients using the databases of two academic and one regional hospital in the Netherlands. Colonoscopic findings in the sporadic duodenal adenoma patients were compared with those of a control group of patients who underwent both gastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy. Furthermore, the frequency of colorectal cancer in the sporadic duodenal adenoma patients was compared with the population incidence of colorectal cancer.
RESULTS: During the period 1991–2006, 102 patients in total with sporadic duodenal adenomas were identified. Colonoscopy was performed in 49 patients (48%), and colorectal neoplasia was present in 21 of these patients (43%). There was a significantly higher rate of both colorectal neoplasia (43% vs 17%, odds ratio [OR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7–7.4) and advanced colorectal adenoma (18% vs 3%, OR 7.8, 95% CI 2.1–29.4) in the patients with sporadic duodenal adenoma compared to that in the control group. Also, the incidence of colorectal cancer was higher in sporadic duodenal adenoma patients compared to that in the population ( P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with sporadic duodenal adenomas appear to be at a significantly higher risk of colorectal neoplasia, and therefore should undergo colonoscopy.     

A Scoring System for the Strength of a Family History of Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND Family history of colorectal cancer is associated with an increased risk for the disease, although there are many combinations of family history that are hard to correlate with risk status. A scoring system for family history of colorectal cancer was designed to make risk more readily quantifiable.METHODS A colonoscopy database was used to test the following points system: each first-degree relative with colorectal cancer = 3 points; each second-degree relative with colorectal cancer = 1 point. Families with one or more first-degree relative affected under 50 years of age = an extra 3 points. Families with one or more second-degree relative affected under 50 years of age = an extra 1 point. Families with multiple relatives on the same side of the family = an extra 3 points (first-degree relatives), 1 point (second-degree relatives), or 2 points (first-degree and second-degree relatives). Points were added and categories defined as follows: low risk, 1 to 4 points; medium risk, 5 to 7 points; high risk, 8 to 10 points; very high risk, >10 points. A control group of average-risk patients having screening colonoscopy was used. Categories were compared in number of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps, and cancers.RESULTS The records of 992 patients were used to test the system. Mean adenomas per patient per group were 0.4 for controls, 1.0 for low risk, 1.0 for medium risk, 1.7 for high risk, and 1.7 for very high risk. Cancers per group were 2 of 196 for controls, 8 of 513 for low risk, 3 of 171 for medium risk, 3 of 84 for high risk, and 1 of 28 for very high risk. The score categories were combined to produce revised risk levels of low (score 1 to 7) and high (>7). Average adenomas per patient in the revised categories were 0.4 (control), 1.0 (low risk), and 1.7 (high risk). The odds ratio of having one to two adenomas was 1.73 (1.19–2.50, 95% confidence limits) in the low-risk group and 2.39 (1.41–4.01) in the high-risk group. Odds ratios for having three or more adenomas were 5.70 (2.44–13.32) in the low-risk group and 10.35 (3.97–26.97) in the high-risk group.CONCLUSION In the two-category system proposed here of quantifying familial risk of colorectal cancer, patients having less than 8 points were at low risk and those with 8 or more were at high risk. Surveillance and chemoprevention protocols can be designed through use of these risk categories. A scoring system for family history of colorectal cancer can make risk assessment easier and facilitate both collaborative studies and patient triage into appropriate screening programs.Reprints are not available.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Dallas, Texas, May 8 to 13, 2004.     

Colonic Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Persons with Negative Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Influence of Age, Gender, and Family History

Six hundred twenty-one asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests (ages 50–75 yr), including 496 with no known risk factors for colorectal cancer and 125 with a single first-degree relative with a history of colonic neoplasia developed after age 40, underwent screening colonoscopy. Three Dukes A cancers were detected in average-risk persons. The overall prevalence of adenomatous polyps was 27%. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that increasing age and male gender were both strong predictors of colonic neoplasia ( p < 0.001). A positive family history of a single first-degree relative with colorectal cancer was not associated with an increased prevalence of colonic neoplasia ( p = 0.29), although an effect may be present if the relative was <60 yr at diagnosis. Overall 16% of males and 7% of women > 60 yr had at least one adenoma that was large (>1 cm in size), villous or tubulovillous, or had grade 3 dysplasia. We conclude that the prevalence of colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests is substantial, particularly in elderly males. A family history of a single first-degree relative diagnosed at age >60 yr with colorectal cancer is not associated with an increased prevalence of colonic adenomas.     

Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Outcomes of colon surveillance after colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy are uncertain. We conducted a prospective study to measure incidence of advanced neoplasia in patients within 5.5 years of screening colonoscopy. METHODS: Three thousand one hundred twenty-one asymptomatic subjects, age 50 to 75 years, had screening colonoscopy between 1994 and 1997 in the Department of Veterans Affairs. One thousand one hundred seventy-one subjects with neoplasia and 501 neoplasia-free controls were assigned to colonoscopic surveillance over 5 years. Cohorts were defined by baseline findings. Relative risks for advanced neoplasia within 5.5 years were calculated. Advanced neoplasia was defined as tubular adenoma greater than > or =10 mm, adenoma with villous histology, adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, or invasive cancer. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-five (76.4%) patients with neoplasia and 298 subjects (59.5%) without neoplasia at baseline had colonoscopy within 5.5 years; 2.4% of patients with no neoplasia had interval advanced neoplasia. The relative risk in patients with baseline neoplasia was 1.92 (95% CI: 0.83-4.42) with 1 or 2 tubular adenomas <10 mm, 5.01 (95% CI: 2.10-11.96) with 3 or more tubular adenomas <10 mm, 6.40 (95% CI: 2.74-14.94) with tubular adenoma > or =10 mm, 6.05 (95% CI: 2.48-14.71) for villous adenoma, and 6.87 (95% CI: 2.61-18.07) for adenoma with high-grade dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong association between results of baseline screening colonoscopy and rate of serious incident lesions during 5.5 years of surveillance. Patients with 1 or 2 tubular adenomas less than 10 mm represent a low-risk group compared with other patients with colon neoplasia.     

Flat adenomas in the National Polyp Study: is there increased risk for high-grade dysplasia initially or during surveillance?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The flat adenoma may be a more aggressive pathway in colorectal carcinogenesis. Sessile adenomas from the National Polyp Study cohort were reclassified histopathologically as flat or polypoid and compared with initial and surveillance pathology. METHODS: A total of 933 sessile adenomas detected during 1980-1990 were reclassified as follows: (1) adenoma thickness (AT): < or =1.3 mm, and (2) adenoma ratio (AR): adenoma thickness <2x normal mucosa thickness. Logistic regression was used to assess whether flat adenomas had an effect on risk for high-grade dysplasia initially, and a Cox proportional hazards model assessed the risk for advanced adenomas at surveillance. RESULTS: The analysis encompassed 8401 person-years of follow-up evaluation. AT and AR measures of adenoma flatness were 95% concordant. By the AT measure, flat adenomas (n = 474) represented 27% of all baseline adenomas. Flat adenomas were found to be no more likely to exhibit high-grade dysplasia than sessile (polypoid) or pedunculated adenomas, the odds ratio for high-grade dysplasia was 1.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-5.47; P = 0.23) for sessile (polypoid) vs. flat adenomas and 1.78 (95% CI, 0.63-5.02; P = 0.28) for pedunculated vs. flat adenomas adjusted for size, villous component, and location, and corrected for correlation of risk within an individual patient. Patients with flat adenomas at initial colonoscopy were not at greater risk for advanced adenomas at surveillance compared with those with polypoid adenomas only, the odds ratio was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.4-1.42; P = .39), adjusted for multiplicity, age, and family history of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Flat adenomas identified in the National Polyp Study cohort at baseline were not associated with a higher risk for high-grade dysplasia initially, or for advanced adenomas at surveillance.     

Excessive alcohol consumption favours high risk polyp or colorectal cancer occurrence among patients with adenomas: a case control study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Excessive alcohol consumption is a risk factor for developing colorectal adenomas. This study aimed to investigate the influence of excessive alcohol consumption on the occurrence of high risk polyps (adenoma > or = 10 mm, villous component, high grade dysplasia) or colorectal cancer among patients with at least one colonic adenoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three groups of patients with at least one colorectal adenoma were included in a case control study: 401 heavy drinkers (group HD, mean daily alcohol intake 117 (SD 4) g/day for a mean duration of 22 (SD 0.6) years), aged 57 (0.5) years (78% men); 152 patients suffering from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), aged 61 (0.9) years (57% male); and 108 patients with a family history (FH) of colorectal adenoma or cancer, aged 55 (1) years (64% male). Exclusion criteria were: anaemia, haematochezia, personal history of colorectal adenoma or cancer, and for groups HD and IBS a family history of colorectal adenoma and/or cancer. Relative risks were estimated by the odds ratio (OR) using a logistic regression model and were expressed with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: After age and sex adjustment, the likelihood of having an adenoma > or = 10 mm was higher in group HD than in the IBS group (OR 1.8, 95% CI (1.2-2.7)) and the likelihood of having high risk adenomas or cancer was higher in group HD compared with the IBS group (OR 1.6, 95% CI (1.2-2.1)) and the FH group although this was not significant (OR 1.6, 95% CI (0.97-2.6) (p=0.081); 90% CI (1.03-2.4)). After age and sex adjustment, the likelihood of having an adenoma with high grade dysplasia or cancer was higher in group HD than in the IBS group (OR 1.7, 95% CI (1.02-2.8)) or group FH, although this was not significant (OR 3.7, 95% CI (0.98-15) (p=0.076); 90% CI (1.10-12.47)). CONCLUSION: In patients with at least one colorectal adenoma, excessive alcohol consumption increases the likelihood of developing high risk adenomas or colorectal cancer.     

A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial colorectal cancer risk

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify published studies quantifying familial colorectal cancer (CRC) risks in first-degree relatives of CRC and colorectal adenoma (CRA) cases and, through a meta-analysis, obtain more precise estimates of familial risk according to the nature of the family history and type of neoplasm. METHODS: Twenty-seven case-control and cohort studies were identified, which reported risks of CRC in relatives of CRC cases and nine, which reported the risk of CRC in relatives of CRA cases. Pooled estimates of risk for various categories of family history were obtained by calculating the weighted average of the log relative risk estimates from studies. RESULTS: The pooled estimates of relative risk were as follows: a first-degree relative with CRC 2.25 (95% CI = 2.00-2.53), colon 2.42 (95% CI = 2.20-2.65), and rectal 1.89 (95% CI = 1.62-2.21) cancer; parent with CRC 2.26 (95% CI = 1.87-2.72); sibling with CRC 2.57 (95% CI = 2.19-3.02); more than one relative with CRC 4.25 (95% CI = 3.01-6.08); relative diagnosed with CRC before age 45, 3.87 (95% CI = 2.40-6.22); and a relative with CRA 1.99 (95% CI = 1.55-2.55). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with a family history of CRC and CRA have a significantly elevated risk of developing CRC compared with those without such a history. Risks are greatest for relatives of patients diagnosed young, those with two or more affected relatives, and relatives of patients with colonic cancers.     

Relationship of visceral adipose tissue to recurrence of adenomatous polyps

OBJECTIVES:   Insulin is a growth factor for colorectal cancer. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is strongly associated with insulin levels, and insulin and visceral obesity have been associated in cohort studies with colorectal cancer. The aim of this investigation was to determine whether VAT is associated with recurrence of adenomatous polyps, the precursor to colorectal cancer.
METHODS:   As an ancillary study to the Polyp Prevention Trial, a randomized clinical trial that evaluated the effect of a low-fat, high-fiber, high vegetable and fruit diet on adenomatous polyp recurrence, subjects at one clinical center underwent measurement of VAT with a single-slice CT scan through the L4–L5 interspace. The scan was performed around the time of the subject's year 4 colonoscopy that determined adenoma recurrence.
RESULTS:   Of 119 subjects, 44 of 84 men (52%) and 16 of 35 women (46%) had a recurrent adenoma ( p = 0.51). Body mass index (BMI) and weight at baseline and at year 4 colonoscopy were unrelated to adenoma recurrence. In a multivariate model including visceral fat quartile, remote history of polyps, gender, age, and randomization group, only remote history of polyps was statistically significantly associated with recurrent adenoma with a relative risk of 4.6 (95% CI 1.7, 12.4, p = 0.001). There was no consistent monotonic trend of increased or decreased risk of recurrence as one ascended quartiles of adipose tissue for visceral, subcutaneous, or total abdominal fat.
CONCLUSION:   In this study, no association between visceral adipose tissue and adenomatous polyp recurrence was observed. Further study and exploration of the role of VAT in adenoma progression is required.     

Prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in smokers

OBJECTIVES: Smoking has been linked with colorectal neoplasia. Previous colonoscopy screening studies have omitted smoking and have examined only gender, age, and family history. Our aim was to use a screening population to measure the prevalence of neoplasia in smokers, the anatomic location of these lesions, and the strength of this association relative to other risk factors. METHODS: Data collected from the charts of 1988 screening colonoscopy patients included colonic findings, histology, risk factors for colorectal neoplasia, and smoking pattern. Current smokers were defined as those who had smoked more than 10 pack-years and were currently smoking or who had quit within the past 10 yr. Our outcomes were any adenomatous lesion and significant colonic neoplasia, which included adenocarcinoma, high grade dysplasia, villous tissue, large (>1 cm) adenomas, and multiple (more than two) adenomas. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that current smokers were more likely to have any adenomatous lesion (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.42-2.51; p < 0.001) as well as significant neoplasia (OR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.56-3.27; p < 0.001) than those who had never smoked. The increased risk for smokers was predominantly for left-sided neoplasia. The risk for significant neoplasia was greater for smokers than for patients with a family history of colorectal cancer (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 0.75-1.92; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking is a significant risk factor for colorectal neoplasia in a screening population, especially for significant left-sided lesions. In our sample population, smoking posed a greater risk than family history of colorectal cancer.     

Impact of a Family History of Colorectal Cancer on the Prevalence of Advanced Adenomas of the Rectosigmoid Colon at Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in 3147 Asymptomatic Patients

Flexible sigmoidoscopy is advised as a screening test for colorectal cancer for persons with a family history of late-onset colorectal cancer. The expected outcome for this approach is not well established. We designed a large, prospective study of an unselected population to assess the impact of a family history of one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer on the prevalence of advanced adenomas at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. We evaluated 8121 patients referred for flexible sigmoidoscopy between 1997 and 1999 and 3147 patients met the inclusion criteria. The 3147 patients were divided into 210 with a family history of colorectal cancer and 2937 without a family history and analyzed for differences in the prevalence of advanced adenomas. Of the 210 with a family history, 3 had an advanced adenoma of the rectosigmoid colon (1.4%) Of the 2937 without a family history, 52 had an advanced adenoma of the rectosigmoid colon (1.8%), including 2 cancers. These differences were not significant. In conclusion, a family history of colorectal cancer had no impact on the prevalence of advanced adenomas in asymptomatic patients at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. The prevalence rates for advanced adenomas and carcinomas of the rectosigmoid colon were low.     

Sporadic duodenal adenoma is associated with colorectal neoplasia

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the association between colorectal neoplasia and sporadic duodenal adenoma. METHODS: A retrospective case control study was conducted using the databases of two major teaching hospitals in Western Australia. The frequency of colorectal neoplasia in patients with sporadic duodenal adenomas was compared with that in a control group of patients presenting for endoscopies. The frequency of colorectal cancer in duodenal adenoma patients was also compared with the population incidence. RESULTS: Of 56 sporadic duodenal adenoma patients, 34 (61%) had been colonoscoped. When comparing the findings between patients with sporadic duodenal adenoma and an endoscoped control group, all colorectal neoplasias were significantly more common in the duodenal adenoma group (56% v 33%; odds ratio (OR) 2.4 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.1-5.4)). Although finding either advanced colorectal adenoma or cancer was also more common in duodenal adenoma patients (38% v 19%; OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.0-5.2)), as was finding colorectal cancer alone (21% v 8%; OR 3.0 (95% CI 1.0-9.1)), the results were not statistically significant. However, the incidence of colorectal cancer was much greater in duodenal adenoma patients than in the population (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sporadic duodenal adenoma has a clinically important association with colorectal neoplasia. Thus patients with duodenal adenomas should undergo colonoscopy to detect colorectal neoplasia.     

Prevalence and risk of colorectal adenoma in asymptomatic Koreans aged 40–49 years undergoing screening colonoscopy

Background and Aim: Colorectal cancer screening is recommended for average‐risk persons beginning at age 50. However, information about the incidence and risk factors of precursor adenoma in preceding decades is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors of colorectal adenoma in persons aged 40–49 years and to compare the data with those aged 30–39 years and 50–59 years. Methods: A cross‐sectional study of 5254 asymptomatic subjects who underwent screening colonoscopy was conducted. Data were stratified by age into three groups: 608 aged 30–39 years, 1930 aged 40–49 years, and 2716 aged 50–59 years. Results: Prevalence of overall adenomas was 10.4% in the 30–39 years age group, 22.2% in the 40–49 years age group, and 32.8% in the 50–59 years age group. Advanced adenoma was found in 0.7% of the 30–39 years age group, 2.7% of the 40–49 years age group, and 4.1% of the 50–59 years age group. In the 40–49 years age group, male sex and current smoking habits showed associations with low‐risk adenoma after multiple adjustments. Moreover, male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–3.23), current smoking (OR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.06–3.50), and family history of colorectal cancer (OR = 2.54, 95%CI: 1.16–5.56) were independent predictors of advanced adenoma in this age group. Conclusions: Prevalence of adenoma in subjects aged 40–49 years was higher than in previous studies. Male sex and current smoking habits along with a family history of colorectal cancer were associated with advanced adenoma in this age group.