Effect of antiepileptic drugs on spontaneous seizures in epileptic rats

The present study investigated whether spontaneously seizing animals are a valid model for evaluating antiepileptic compounds in the treatment of human epilepsy. We examined whether clinically effective antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), including carbamazepine (CBZ), valproic acid (VPA), ethosuximide (ESM), lamotrigine (LTG), or vigabatrin (VGB) suppress spontaneous seizures in a rat model of human temporal lobe epilepsy, in which epilepsy is triggered by status epilepticus induced by electrical stimulation of the amygdala. Eight adult male rats with newly diagnosed epilepsy and focal onset seizures were included in the study. Baseline seizure frequency was determined by continuous video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring during a 7 days baseline period. This was followed by a 2-3 days titration period, a 5-7 days treatment period, and a 2-3 days wash-out period. During the 5-7 days treatment period, animals were treated successively with CBZ (120 mg/kg/day), VPA (600 mg/kg/day), ESM (400 mg/kg/day), LTG (20 mg/kg/day), and VGB (250 mg/kg/day). VPA, LTG, and VGB were the most efficient of the compounds investigated, decreasing the mean seizure frequency by 83, 84, and 60%, respectively. In the VPA group, the percentage of rats with a greater than 50% decrease in seizure frequency was 100%, in the LTG group 88%, in the VGB group 83%, in the CBZ group 29%, and in the ESM group 38%. During the 7 day treatment period, 20% of the VPA-treated animals and 14% of the CBZ-treated animals became seizure-free. These findings indicate that rats with focal onset spontaneous seizures respond to the same AEDs as patients with focal onset seizures. Like in humans, the response to AEDs can vary substantially between animals. These observations support the idea that spontaneously seizing animals are a useful tool for testing novel compounds for the treatment of human epilepsy.     

Effect of vigabatrin addition on carbamazepine blood serum levels in patients with epilepsy

Because vigabatrin (VGB) is not metabolized by liver enzymes and does not bind with serum proteins, there is little theoretical chance of it interacting with other antiepileptic drugs. However, our observations have shown that if VGB is added to carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy, some patients respond with adverse, toxic symptoms suggesting possible carbamazepine-vigabatrin interaction. This article presents the results of a study of 66 epileptic patients (27 women and 39 men), age 10-66 years (mean, 28.2 years), with focal seizure onset with or without secondary generalization. In these patients, in addition to CBZ therapy with an average dose of 16.7 mg/kg per day (8.6-26.8), VGB, average dose 31.1 mg/kg per day (7.1-57.9), was added. CBZ concentration was measured twice: prior to VGB introduction and 5-12 weeks after the final dose of VGB was reached. In our study 69.7% of patients responded to VGB addition with a significant increase (by at least 10%) in CBZ concentration. A correlation between the value of the increase and the initial level of CBZ prior to VGB addition was found also. Correlational analysis (Pearson's r) revealed a negative correlation between CBZ concentration and increased concentration after VGB addition (r = -0.47, df = 64, P < 0.001). This negative correlation means that if the initial CBZ level is lower, its concentration value after VGB addition is higher.     

The effect on vision of associated treatments in patients taking vigabatrin: carbamazepine versus valproate

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect on visual function of a concomitant antiepileptic drug (AED) in patients treated with vigabatrin (VGB). METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive patients with a history of partial seizures currently treated with VGB with either carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproate (VPA) were examined with automated kinetic perimetry, static perimetry, electrooculogram (EOG), and electroretinogram (ERG). An original device based on kinetic perimetry was developed to quantify the area of perception for each isopter. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were finally included. The results showed a significant difference in patients treated with VGB-VPA compared with patients treated with VGB-CBZ concerning the mean defect of static perimetry and the peripheral and midperipheral isopter (III 4e and III 1a Goldmann equivalent, respectively) in kinetic perimetry. EOG and ERG results did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The visual impairment due to visual field constriction was more important in patients treated with VGB and VPA compared with patients treated with VGB and CBZ. The origin of this difference between the two associations could not be related to any particular retinal electrophysiologic abnormality.     

A quantitative study of daytime sleepiness induced by carbamazepine and add-on vigabatrin in epileptic patients

Introduction – The clinical relevance of daytime sleepiness associated with carbamazepine (CBZ) and vigabatrin (VGB) was objectively assessed by the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) and nocturnal sleep recordings. Material and methods – Twenty-six patients with partial epilepsy and mean monthly seizure frequency of 4, aged 18 to 48 years, receiving chronic monotherapy with CBZ and subsequent VGB addition for 2 months (14 patients), were compared with a group of healthy subjects. Subjective daytime sleepiness was complained by 13 patients on CBZ monotherapy and 9 patients during VGB add-on treatment. Results – No differences in nocturnal sleep parameters, but significantly shorter daytime sleep latencies at the MSLT, were detected in CBZ-treated patients as compared with healthy controls. Addition of VGB therapy did not further enhance objective daytime sleepiness. Conclusion – Some sleepiness occurs in chronically CBZ-treated epileptic patients, which can be objectively measured by the MSLT, but it is not aggravated by add-on VGB.     

Carbamazepine enhances discriminative memory in a rat model of epilepsy

PURPOSE: Seizures and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the main causes for cognitive impairment in persons with epilepsy. It is still a matter of debate whether carbamazepine (CBZ) improves cognition because of its own psychotropic effects or because it is more effective to treat temporal epilepsy. Our objective was to analyze the performance of CBZ-treated or nontreated pilocarpine epileptic rats in an object-recognition test. METHODS: Twelve chronic pilocarpine-induced epileptic rats were treated with CBZ, 40 mg/kg, or saline, t.i.d. for 8 days. Twenty-one nonepileptic controls were treated with CBZ or saline. On day 8 of treatment, all rats were tested with an object-recognition paradigm. RESULTS: No locomotor impairment was detected in chronic epilepsy or CBZ treatment, as exploration during training was not affected. Exploratory behaviors during the choice session were not decreased in rats treated with CBZ; therefore CBZ does not compromise procedural memory. Epileptic rats showed a nonsignificant change in the discrimination performance, and prolonged treatment with CBZ in epileptic rats induced a significant increase in object discrimination during the choice session. CONCLUSIONS: Even though pilocarpine-induced epileptic animals do not show compromised performance in the spontaneous object-recognition test, prolonged CBZ treatment has a positive effect on a simple object-discrimination task. These results may be associated with the psychotropic effects of CBZ.     

Vigabatrin visual toxicity: evolution and dose dependence

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence and prognosis of visual field defects (VFDs) in epilepsy patients with and without vigabatrin (VGB) treatment; to investigate the possible relationship between VFDs and cumulative VGB dose, and to characterise the evolution of VFDs. METHODS: A cohort of 155 presurgical candidates who had undergone full-field Goldmann perimetry (GP) was studied, 99 (64%) of whom had been treated with VGB. All GPs were reevaluated in 1998 by one experienced examiner, blinded to medication. Duration of treatment and total VGB dose were related to perimetric results. RESULTS: Twenty-five (16%) of the 155 patients had VFDs: Nineteen (19%) of the 99 VGB-treated patients, and six (11%) of the 56 patients unexposed to VGB. VGB-treated patients with VFDs had been treated significantly longer than those without VFDs. Cumulative VGB dose could be calculated for 84 patients. The prevalence of VFDs increased significantly with increasing total VGB-dose, from 4% in the 51 patients who had been exposed to 相似文献   

Effects of chronic use of carbamazepine and valproate on cognitive processes

We investigated effects on cognitive processes of chronic use of carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA) in a group of young patients with epilepsy. Scores on various neuropsychological tests were obtained from patients treated with two monotherapy regimens, one involving CBZ and one involving VPA. In general, the cognitive profile of the two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was the same, except for some attention and memory aspects on which the VPA subjects scored better and for some motor tests which the CBZ group performed faster. The latter finding is in accord with results of studies reporting an increase in motor speed induced by CBZ. Furthermore, the observed impairments caused by both CBZ and VPA were relatively mild as compared with those caused by traditional AEDs such as phenytoin (PHT) and phenobarbital (PB).     

Lack of Interaction of Gabapentin with Carbamazepine or Valproate

Summary: Gabapentin (GBP) studies were conducted in patients with epilepsy receiving carbamazepine (CBZ, n= 12) or valproate (VPA, n = 14) monotherapy. The effects of GBP coadministration on steady-state CBZ or VPA concentrations and of these antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on GBP pharmacokinetics were investigated. GBP (400 mg) was coadministered every 8 h for 3% days with CBZ or for 5 1/3 days with VPA. GBP was well tolerated. Mean steady-state plasma CBZ/CBZ-10, ll-epoxide (CBZ-E) and serum VPA concentrations before, during, and after GBP administration were not significantly different. Mean steady-state GBP pharmacokinetic parameters during CBZ or VPA coadministration were similar to steady-state parameters reported in healthy subjects. Thus, no pharmacokinetic interaction exists between CBZ or VPA and GBP. No dosage adjustment is necessary when GBP and CBZ or VPA are coadministered.     

Color vision and macular recovery time in epileptic adolescents treated with valproate and carbamazepine

Visual dysfunction has been reported in patients diagnosed with epilepsy. Some of these visual disturbances may be attributable to either the disease process, or the anticonvulsant therapy prescribed to control the seizures. The aims of our study were to evaluate whether color vision and macular function are impaired in epileptic adolescents, to study if the monotherapy with valproic acid (VPA) and carbamazepine (CBZ) can affect color vision and macular function and to determine the possible relationship between color vision, retinal function and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) dosage and their serum concentrations. We examined 45 (16 male and 29 female, mean age ± SD, 15.71 ± 2.01 years) Caucasian epileptic patients suffering from various types of cryptogenic epilepsy before the beginning of therapy and after 1 year of VPA or CBZ monotherapy and 40 sex‐ and age‐matched healthy controls. Color vision was assessed by Farnsworth Munsell (FM) 100‐hue test and total error score (TES) was evaluated. This test consists of colored caps: the testee has to arrange the caps according to their colors macular function was assessed by nyctometry evaluating initial recovery time (IRT) and summation method (SM). This test evaluates visual acuity after a period of intense illumination of macula. Analysis of variance was used to evaluate the difference between controls and patients; moreover, Pearson's correlation test have been performed. Before the beginning of therapy, there were no differences in color vision and macular function between controls and epileptic patients. After 1 year, the patients, treated with VPA or CBZ, showed a deficit in FM 100‐hue test. At nyctometry, all patients showed no significant variation of macular function between baseline evaluation and second evaluation at end of the follow‐up. Our study demonstrates that, in our group of epileptic patients, epilepsy per se does not affect color vision and retinal function. In contrast, after 1 years of therapy with VPA and CBZ these patients showed a deficit in FM 100‐hue test although nyctometry evaluation continued to be normal allowing to exclude an impairment in macular function. Further investigations are required to determine the pathophysiological alteration(s) that are at the basis of color perception defects.     

Vigabatrin

The new antiepileptic drugs introduced over the last decade provide a welcome increase in the therapeutic options available for the 25% of children with epilepsy who remain refractory to traditional therapy.¹ In the mid 1980s, vigabatrin (VGB) was the first of these to be made available in clinical practice. In 1997, the visual field deficits reported in association with VGB prompted a review of its place in the management of epilepsy. We provide an overview of the uses of VGB and a discussion of the difficulties which currently affect our clinical practice.     

Pregabalin drug interaction studies: lack of effect on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine, and valproate in patients with partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: Pregabalin (PGB) is an alpha2-delta ligand with demonstrated efficacy in epilepsy, neuropathic pain, and anxiety disorders. PGB is highly efficacious as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: Given its efficacy as adjunctive therapy, the potential for interaction of PGB with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was assessed in patients with partial epilepsy in open-label, multiple-dose studies. Patients received PGB, 600 mg/day (200 mg q8h) for 7 days, in combination with their individualized maintenance monotherapy with valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), lamotrigine (LTG), or carbamazepine (CBZ). RESULTS: Trough steady-state concentrations of CBZ (and its epoxide metabolite), PHT, LTG, and VPA were unaffected by concomitant PGB administration. Likewise, PGB steady-state pharmacokinetic parameter values were similar among patients receiving CBZ, PHT, LTG, or VPA and, in general, were similar to those observed historically in healthy subjects receiving PGB alone. The PGB-AED combinations were generally well tolerated. PGB may be added to VPA, LTG, PHT, or CBZ therapy without concern for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.     

The effect of vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl GABA) on cerebral blood flow and metabolism.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of vigabatrin (VGB; gamma-vinyl gamma-aminobutyric acid [GABA]), a selective irreversible GABA-transaminase inhibitor, on cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (CMRGlc) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) measured with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET and 15O water PET. BACKGROUND: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) reduce CMRGlc to varying degrees. Phenobarbital causes a mean decrease of 30 to 40%. Phenytoin, carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproate (VPA) cause milder reductions in CMRGlc. The combination of VPA with CBZ results in a greater decrease than either drug alone. The effect of novel AEDs on both CBF and CMRGlc has not been studied extensively. METHODS: Fourteen patients with refractory complex partial seizures on CBZ monotherapy for 4 weeks were included in the study. All patients had baseline 18F-FDG and 15O water PET studies followed by double-blind randomization to placebo (PLC) or VGB while on continuous CBZ treatment. PET scans were repeated after an interval of 2 months on target dose of VGB (50 mg/kg) or PLC. Quantitative PET data analysis was performed using a region of interest template. Significance was tested with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in age, duration of epilepsy, or CBZ levels was observed in the two patient groups. VGB reduced global CMRGlc by 8.1+/-6.5% and global CBF by 13.1+/-10.4%. The change in CMRGlc was different in patients taking VGB compared with those on PLC (p < 0.04). VGB patients showed regional decreases in both CMRGlc and CBF, particularly in temporal lobes. CSF total GABA increased in the VGB patient group (1.48+/-1.06 versus 4.03+/-4.19 nm/mL). The increase differed from the PLC group (p < 0.03). We found a strong relation between decreased total CSF GABA and increased CMRGlc in the VGB patient group (R2 = 0.82, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Vigabatrin (VGB) causes mild reductions in both cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (CMRGlc) in contrast to other drugs such as barbiturates, which are direct agonists at the gamma-aminobutyric acid-benzodiazepine receptor complex. Conventional AEDs depress CBF and CMRGlc to a greater degree than does VGB. The relatively mild reduction could be due to pre- as well as postsynaptic effects or a use-dependent mechanism.     

Visual Function is Stable in Patients Who Continue Long-Term Vigabatrin Therapy: Implications for Clinical Decision Making

PURPOSE: Vigabatrin (VGB) has been shown to cause visual field constriction and other forms of mild visual dysfunction. We determined the safety of continuing VGB therapy in patients who had received prolonged treatment (>2 years) with the drug by serially monitoring changes in visual function over a 1-year period of continued therapy. We also followed up patients who discontinued VGB to see whether alternative therapies are effective. METHODS: Fifteen of 17 patients who continued VGB therapy had visual-function testing (visual acuity, color vision, kinetic and static perimetry) every 3 months for 1 year. Eighteen patients who discontinued VGB were given alternative antiepileptic drugs (AEDs); their seizure responses were measured after > or =3 months of treatment. RESULTS: Patients continuing VGB showed no worsening of visual acuity, color vision, or visual-field constriction beyond that measured in the initial test. Many patients who discontinued VGB had good seizure control with either newer or previously unsuccessful AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who have an excellent response to VGB and only mild visual changes, continued therapy may be safe with close visual monitoring. Patients who do not have a significant reduction in seizures or who experience considerable visual dysfunction with VGB may respond well to alternative therapies.     

Vigabatrin as add-on therapy for adult complex partial seizures: a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study. The Canadian Vigabatrin Study Group.

Vigabatrin (VGB) is a novel antiepileptic drug effective as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures. In this study, the efficacy and tolerability of VGB as adjunctive therapy were evaluated in patients with refractory epilepsy. Adult patients with a definite diagnosis of complex partial seizures and/or partial seizures secondarily generalized were recruited from 10 Canadian centres. Patients were randomized to receive either active medication or placebo in a double- blind fashion and entered a 36-week titration and maintenance phase with regularly scheduled visits. Both efficacy parameters and safety assessments were monitored. Clinical laboratory, evoked potential studies, MRI, and neuropsychological tests were also performed. Forty-eight percent of VGB-treated patients vs. 26 percent of placebo-treated patients had a 50 percent or greater reduction in the frequency of complex partial seizures and partial seizures secondarily generalized. Vigabatrin was well tolerated by the majority of patients. Minor neurological side effects were observed in a number of patients in both treatment groups. No serious systemic toxicity was observed. No changes in evoked potential studies or MRI findings were noted. Vigabatrin was found to be an effective and well-tolerated antiepileptic drug when used as adjunctive therapy in patients with difficult to control complex partial seizures and for partial seizures secondarily generalized. Vigabatrin is a selective irreversible inhibitor of the GABA- degradating enzyme GABA transaminase and has shown efficacy in a number of clinical trials in patients with difficult to control partial seizures. Vigabatrin has been found most effective against complex partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures in both adults and children. Vigabatrin has also been shown to reduce infantile spasms secondary to various aetiologies and is most effective in spasms associated with tuberous sclerosis. The aim of this study was to further extend the clinical experience with VGB as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult patients with difficult to control complex partial seizures and/or partial seizures secondarily generalized. In addition to the assessments of efficacy and tolerability to VGB, neuropsychological evaluations were also carried out.     

Influence of D-Cycloserine on the Anticonvulsant Activity of Phenytoin and Carbamazepine Against Electroconvulsions in Mice

Summary: Purpose: D-Cycloserine (DCS) is a high-efficacy partial agonist at the strychnine-insensitive glycine modulatory site within the N-methyl+-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor/ionophore complex. Previous studies demonstrated that DCS exhibits anticonvulsant activity in a variety of experimental epilepsy models. In this study, we determined the influence of DCS in subprotective doses on the anticonvulsant action of phenytoin (PHT) and carbamazepine (CBZ) in mice. Methods: Two electroconvulsive tests were used, i.e., determination of seizure threshold and maximal electro-shock seizures. Antiepileptic drug-induced motor and long-term memory deficits were quantified by using the chimney test and the passive-avoidance test, respectively. In addition, plasma levels of PHT and CBZ were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay to exclude any pharmacokinetic interactions. Results: DCS, when used alone in doses of 80 and 160 mg/kg, significantly increased the threshold for electro-convulsive seizures. DCS in a wide range of doses (1.25–40 mg/kg) was combined with either PHT or CBZ and tested in electroconvulsive tests. DCS, at doses of 2.5 and 10 mg/kg, was the most effective in potentiating the threshold-increasing action of PHT; higher doses of DCS (20 and 40 mg/kg) were required to achieve a similar effect of CBZ. In maximal electroshock-induced seizures, DCS (10 mg/kg) augmented the protective action of PHT, but was ineffective at a dose of 40 mg/kg with CBZ. DCS did not potentiate the neurotoxicity produced by PHT and CBZ in the chimney test. Both PHT and CBZ induced impairments of long-term memory; PHT-induced memory adverse effects were counteracted by DCS (10 mg/kg). There was no such effect on CBZ-induced memory impairment, and a worsening influence was observed. Any pharmacokinetic interactions were excluded by measuring total and free plasma levels of both antiepileptic drugs. Conclusion: Our results suggest that combining DCS with PHT and CBZ may be beneficial in treating epileptic seizures.     

Captopril potentiates the anticonvulsant activity of carbamazepine and lamotrigine in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model

Some studies suggest a higher risk of hypertension in people with epilepsy. Captopril, a potent and selective angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, is a well known antihypertensive drug. Besides the peripheral renin–angiotensin system (RAS), ACE inhibitors are also suggested to affect the brain RAS which might participate in the regulation of seizure susceptibility. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of captopril on the protective action of numerous antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine [CBZ], phenytoin [PHT], valproate [VPA], phenobarbital [PB], oxcarbazepine [OXC], lamotrigine [LTG] and topiramate [TPM]) against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. This study was accompanied by an evaluation of adverse effects of combined treatment with captopril and antiepileptic drugs in the passive avoidance task and chimney test. Captopril (25 and 50 mg/kg i.p.) did not influence the threshold for electroconvulsions. Among the tested antiepileptics, captopril (25 and 50 mg/kg i.p.) potentiated the antiseizure action of CBZ, decreasing its ED₅₀ value from 12.1 to 8.9 and 8.7 mg/kg, respectively. Moreover, captopril (50 mg/kg i.p.) enhanced the anticonvulsant activity of LTG. ED₅₀ value for LTG was lowered from 5.1 to 3.5 mg/kg. The observed interactions between captopril and CBZ or LTG were pharmacodynamic in nature as captopril did not alter plasma and total brain concentrations of these antiepileptics. The combinations of captopril with antiepileptic drugs did not lead to retention deficits in the passive avoidance task or motor impairment in the chimney test. Based on the current preclinical data, it is suggested that captopril may positively interact with CBZ and LTG in epileptic patients. The combinations of captopril with the remaining antiepileptics (PHT, VPA, PB, OXC and TPM) seem neutral.     

Capillary microscopy and hemorheology in children during antiepileptic monotherapy with carbamazepine and valproate

The interactions of epilepsy and antiepileptic therapy an one hand and cardiovascular system on the other hand are multiple and complex. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) cause alterations of serum lipids and of the fatty acid composition of the membranes. Homocystein, known to induce vascular endothelial damage was found to be elevated in patients on valproate (VPA) and carbamazepine (CBZ) therapy. Marked coronary artherosclerosis and myocardial infarction may already occur in children treated with CBZ. Community based studies corroborated a higher incidence of myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular diseases hypercholesterinemia, left ventricle hypertrophy and stroke in patients with epilepsy. In this context, we wanted to elevate changes of microcirculation related to AEDs commonly prescribed such as VPA and CBZ. Capillary microscopy is a non-invasive technique for measuring the velocity of red blood cells and for determining nutritional blood flow in the capillaries of the skin. It can easily be performed in children. The aim of this study was to look for possible effects an antiepileptic monotherapy with carbamazepine or valproate has on the peripheral microcirculation in epileptic children. We were able to examine 14 children with CBZ and 24 children with VPA, recruited in our neuropediatric Unit. The results were compared to normative values, determined in former analyses of 207 healthy children. We found significant differences in capillary density, tortuous index of the capillaries, capillary diameter and flow rate of erythrocytes for both antiepileptic drugs. Additionally, there were changes in plasma viscosity and the aggregation of erythrocytes. These microcapillary effects could be of special interest in the relationship of a long-term antiepileptic therapy and the development of vascular diseases. We suggest that the influence of AEDs on microcirculation should also be considered in further studies on cardiovascular changes in patients with antiepileptic long-term medication.     

Anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine on spontaneous seizures in rats with kainate-induced epilepsy: comparison of intraperitoneal injections with drug-in-food protocols

PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the effectiveness of intraperitoneal (IP) injections and oral administration of carbamazepine (CBZ) in food on the frequency of spontaneous motor seizures in rats with kainate-induced epilepsy. The purpose was to develop a convenient drug-in-food approach for continuous, long-term administration of potential antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: Single IP injections of CBZ (10-100 mg/kg) were compared to vehicle injections via six AED-versus-vehicle tests using a repeated-measures, crossover protocol. Similar protocols were used with CBZ-containing or control food pellets. RESULTS: CBZ significantly reduced motor seizure frequency at 30 and 100 mg/kg after single IP injections, and these doses completely blocked motor seizures during a 6-h postdrug epoch in 25% and 70% of the animals, respectively. Single administrations of 30 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg CBZ in food also significantly reduced motor seizures, and blocked seizures in 33% and 89% of the rats, respectively. CBZ administered in food three times per day (100 mg/kg x3 CBZ in food) continuously blocked nearly all motor seizures over a 5-day period, and completely suppressed motor seizures in 50% of the animals tested. CONCLUSIONS: CBZ strongly suppresses spontaneous motor seizures, and single doses of CBZ in food are as effective as IP injections in rats with kainate-induced epilepsy. CBZ administered regularly in food continuously blocks nearly all motor seizures, and may provide a relatively simple method to test AEDs in chronic models of epilepsy.     

Pre- rather than co-application of vigabatrin increases the efficacy of tiagabine in hippocampal slices

PURPOSE: The antiepileptic drug vigabatrin (VGB) increases intracellular availability of the inhibitory transmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) by inhibition of GABA-transaminase. A blockade of the GABA uptake is the main mechanism of action of tiagabine (TGB). Based on this, the two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can be speculated to act synergistically so that their combined antiepileptic efficacy is supraadditive. METHODS: To test this, experiments were performed on hippocampal slices of guinea-pigs. As an epilepsy model, epileptiform field potentials (EFPs) were induced by omission of Mg2+ from the bath solution and recorded in stratum pyramidale of the CA3 region. VGB (7.5 microM) and TGB (0.75 microM) were added to the superfusate. RESULTS: VGB, given alone, failed to decrease the repetition rate of EFPs. Similarly, TGB applied alone only transiently led to a nonsignificant reduction of the EFP frequency. Combining VGB and TGB, their suppressive efficacy increased, yielding a significant reduction of EFP frequency, which, however, again did not persist. Pretreatment of the preparations with VGB for 2 h, followed by additional application of TGB, or TGB alone, drastically and persistently potentiated the effects. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that VGB and TGB show favorable pharmacodynamic interactions, provided VGB is allowed to block intracellular GABA degradation before GABA uptake block by TGB.     

Carbamazepine and Lamotrigine in Healthy Volunteers: Relevance to Early Tolerance and Clinical Trial Dosage

Summary: This study was conducted to examine the effects of acute doses of lamotrigine (LTG) and carbamazepine (CBZ) in healthy subjects and determine whether the low tendency to impairment with LTG observed in animals applied to humans. Twelve healthy men participated in a placebo-controlled, balanced, doubleblind comparison of the drugs on a series of psychomotor, autonomic, sensory, and subjective variables. Variables were analyzed by analysis of variance, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Adaptive tracking and body sway were impaired by CBZ 600 mg. CBZ 400 and 600 mg impaired smooth pursuit eye movements and also reduced mean peak saccadic velocity. No differences from placebo occurred after LTG. CBZ 600 mg increased heart rate (HR), but no drug-related changes were noted in pupil size, salivary secretion, visual near point, or subjective effects. During the controlled study, mean plasma CBZ concentrations at 2 and 6.5 h after the 600-mg dose were 5.28 and 5.36 μg/ml; after LTG 300 mg, they were 3.16 and 3.00 μg/ml. Increased CBZ saliva concentrations were significantly associated (p < 0.01) with impaired adaptive tracking, smooth and saccadic eye movements, and increased HR, and plasma concentrations were associated with impaired eye movements and body sway.